Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

Replay – Freedom is the Cure: Unpacking & Defeating the Medical Tactics of a World Takeover

https://doctors4covidethics.org/video-replays-d4ce-symposium-iv-session-i/

Video Replays: D4CE Symposium IV – Session I

D4CE presented the fourth symposium on June 11, 2022. Leading experts from the various field presented their studies and expressed their opinions freely and honestly.

Program Overview with Taylor Hudak

SESSION 1 : mRNA Vaccines – A Serious Threat to Mankind With Polly Tommey and Michael Palmer

Sucharit Bhakdi: The fundamental mechanism of damage is simple and universal

Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, MD, professor emeritus of microbiology and immunology, explains the key mechanisms of vaccine damage to tissues and blood vessels. The mRNA vaccine is taken up into the cells, particularly those which line the blood vessels. The cells express the spike protein, causing them to be attacked and destroyed by the immune system. The resulting vascular damage triggers blot clots. Dr. Bhakdi makes it clear that this disease mechanism is not limited to COVID vaccines alone but must be expected with any and all future mRNA vaccines.

Michael Palmer: Summary of the evidence – irrefutable proof of causality

Dr. Michael Palmer, MD, summarizes the evidence from autopsies which was produced by pathologist Prof. Arne Burkhardt and colleagues, and which substantiates the damage mechanism outlined by Dr. Bhakdi in his preceding talk: the mRNA vaccine is taken up into our body cells, which express the spike protein and are then attacked and destroyed by our own immune system. The observed mechanism of immune attack appears to be completely general and must be expected to apply to future mRNA vaccines against infections other than COVID as well.

Alexandra Latypova: Pfizer’s and Moderna’s preclinical vaccine trials – evidence of scientific and regulatory fraud

Sasha Latypova, who is an expert in drug development, explains how the manufacturers of the COVID mRNA vaccines, Pfizer and Moderna, skipped essential preclinical safety studies, and how the FDA let them get away with it, failing in its duty to protect the public from these unsafe medicines. The FDA remains dysfunctional as of today, and it cannot be trusted with protecting the public from harm caused by any future vaccines or other medicines.

Her article on Pfizer and Moderna’s fraud is available here:

https://doctors4covidethics.org/did-pfizer-perform-adequate-safety-testing-for-its-covid-19-mrna-vaccine-in-preclinical-studies-evidence-of-scientific-and-regulatory-fraud/

Thomas Binder: A clinical perspective and synopsis

Dr. Thomas Binder discusses the toxicity of the mRNA vaccines from a clinical and epidemiological perspective. He presents the evidence to show that the “vaccines” are unnecessary, negatively effective, and unsafe. He emphasizes that not only the emergency use authorisation of the mRNA injections against SARS-CoV-2 must be suspended immediately, but also that no other mRNA injections may be approved, because even if a not toxic antigen is chosen, the toxicity of the Lipid Nano Particles, the modified RNA and the auto immune like reaction against the cells, who are coerced to produce and then present this foreign protein on their surface, will be the same. He also touches on the question of how to approach the clinical treatment of vaccine injury. He ends with another call to action to his fellow doctors.

Renate Holzeisen AND Mary Holland WITH Polly Tommey: legal actions against mRNA vaccine approvals

CHD’s Polly Tommey and lawyers Mary Holland (President of CHD) and Renate Holzeisen (European Human Rights Lawyer, Italy) discuss current legal actions against the COVID-19 vaccination approval procedures and planned action against mRNA technology itself at European courts. The increasing success rate of cases challenging COVID-related regulations and mandates across the globe indicate that judges – just as any human being – start experiencing and recognising the devastating impact of vaccinations unlawfully pushed through neglecting procedural evaluations and requirements.

Mary Holland and Brian Hooker with Polly Tommey: mRNA effects on fertility and sterility

Mary Holland (Lawyer and President of CHD) and Brian Hooker (biomedical scientist, Ph.D., CHD, U.S.) join Polly Tommey from CHD.TV to discuss historical precedents of vaccine-induced sterility. One example is the HPV vaccine. Another example is the covert sterilization campaign in Kenya, which is the subject of a recent CHD movie, Infertility: A Diabolical Agenda. In this experimental tetanus vaccination program, many Kenya women were injected with a tetanus vaccine containing the human pregnancy hormone beta-HCG. 

The discussion then turns to the high number of adverse event reports related to the menstrual cycle and pregnancy in VEARS, indicating the harmful effects of the COVID mRNA vaccines on fertility. While we do not yet know the exact magnitude of this problem, it must be taken seriously and addressed openly. However, the WHO and other health authorities continue to ignore the issues, proving that they are not trustworthy with our health and the future of Humanity.

Follow us on
Rumble Channel:

Doctors For Covid Ethics Rumble Channel

BitChute Channel:

D4CE BitChute Channel

PeerTube Channel:

Doctors For Covid Ethics PeerTube Channel

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Study Shows Pfizer & Moderna Shots More Likely to Cause Serious Injury Than Reduce Risk of COVID-Related Hospitalization

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4125239

Serious Adverse Events of Special Interest Following mRNA Vaccination in Randomized Trial

 23 Jun 2022

Abstract

Introduction: In 2020, prior to COVID-19 vaccine rollout, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations and Brighton Collaboration created a priority list, endorsed by the World Health Organization, of potential adverse events relevant to COVID-19 vaccines. We leveraged the Brighton Collaboration list to evaluate serious adverse events of special interest observed in phase III randomized trials of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

Methods: Secondary analysis of serious adverse events reported in the placebo-controlled, phase III randomized clinical trials of Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (NCT04368728 and NCT04470427), focusing analysis on potential adverse events of special interest identified by the Brighton Collaboration.

Results: Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were associated with an increased risk of serious adverse events of special interest, with an absolute risk increase of 10.1 and 15.1 per 10,000 vaccinated over placebo baselines of 17.6 and 42.2 (95% CI -0.4 to 20.6 and -3.6 to 33.8), respectively. Combined, the mRNA vaccines were associated with an absolute risk increase of serious adverse events of special interest of 12.5 per 10,000 (95% CI 2.1 to 22.9). The excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest surpassed the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group in both Pfizer and Moderna trials (2.3 and 6.4 per 10,000 participants, respectively).

Discussion: The excess risk of serious adverse events found in our study points to the need for formal harm-benefit analyses, particularly those that are stratified according to risk of serious COVID-19 outcomes such as hospitalization or death.

Note: Funding Information: This study had no funding support.

_______________

**Comment**

Sadly, this won’t matter.  The FDA is simply rubber-stamping these injections despite logic, sound reason, science and reality.

For more:

Category:

Activism, research, vaccines, Viruses

FDA Waives Clinical Trials for Boosters Ensuring a Perpetual Pandemic. Policy of Shots First, Questions Later, Is Not Informed Consent

Yes, you read that right.  No trials.  I mean, why bother?  Science is now simply done by press release.

**UPDATE  July, 2022**

Now we learn that the WHO is helping the FDA through “Future Framework” skip further COVID shot clinical trials and that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is the biggest voluntary contributor to the WHO, so Gates is likely directing the play.

Important points:

  • Moderna, Pfizer and Novavax are developing reformulated COVID-19 shots to target the original Omicron strain (BA.1) which has been replaced by newer variants.
  • They know that the FDA is not going to look at health outcomes so they are going to great lengths to jack up the antibody response.
  • Pfizer tested a double-strength dose (60 mcg of mRNA instead of 30 mcg) even though they had previously ruled out a higher dose because of safety concerns. So the antibody levels are through the roof.
  • VRBPAC admitted that there are no known correlates of protection (antibody levels do not tell you who will be immune) so antibody measures are medically meaningless.
  • Turbo charging the immune response may also turbo charge adverse events. But the “Future Framework” allows pharmaceutical companies to skip clinical trials altogether.
  • The FDA is not looking out for worst case scenarios.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/fda-future-framework-covid-vaccines

FDA Panel Votes to Waive Clinical Trials for New COVID Boosters

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s vaccine advisory panel voted 19 to 2 on Tuesday to add an Omicron component to COVID-19 boosters this fall, over objections by panel members and despite a lack of data.
fda future framework covid vaccines feature

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) vaccine advisory panel on Tuesday voted 19 to 2 to recommend new COVID-19 booster shots that include the Omicron variant this fall.

The FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) did not issue guidance on whether additional data would be needed to recommend an updated composition of the primary-series vaccines authorized for emergency use in the U.S., or whether it would be appropriate to continue to use a primary-series vaccine as a booster.

It is the first time VRBPAC has suggested vaccine makers modify their vaccines to target a different variant, according to CNBC, which also reported the FDA will likely accept the committee’s recommendation.

If so, the FDA would be authorizing a vaccine change without requiring additional data showing a bivalent vaccine — containing both the original 2019 Wuhan variant and one of the Omicron variants — is safe and effective for those age groups that are already authorized to receive a booster dose.

(See link for article)

__________________

**Comment*

Even Dr. Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center and professor of pediatrics in the Division of Infectious Diseases at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, and Dr. Hank Bernstein, professor of pediatrics at Zucker School of Medicine broke from the panel to vote against the initiative.

You know it’s bad when Offit finally puts his food down.  He’s as pro-vaccine as you can get.

Two other little flies in the ointment are that by the time a subsequent booster is approved, it will contain outdated strains, as well as the fact they admit there’s no established correlate of protection, and that while antibody data is important so are the T-cells, which they simply don’t understand yet and which are “difficult to study.”

But problems & unknowns be damned and full-steam ahead!

Dr. Nass brings up yet another sticky point: the fact they will likely keep the current version and add another — which might double the amount of mRNA.  Nobody seems to know.

Dr. Brian Hooker states this FDA action will:

“increase the harm to the U.S. public to unprecedented levels, as this action will further circumvent necessary clinical trials even beyond the slapdash testing of COVID-19 vaccines under Emergency Use Authorization.”

“This adds to a foundation of lies used to authorize the original COVID-19 vaccines without anywhere near proper testing.”

Dr. Dustin Bryce, with Interest of Justice, said the FDA, CDC WHO are:

“usurping Congress’ definition of a vaccine — which is any substance designed for the prevention of one or more disease.”

“FDA actually classifies mRNA as gene therapy, which they say is to treat or cure an existing disease by modifying your genes.” “Gene therapies are still being studied and are experimental at this time.”

Bryce went on to state that gene therapy, unlike a vaccine, is so inherently unsafe the FDA requires 15 years of research to follow up on safety due to known risks of antibody-dependent enhancement, alteration of DNA and delayed adverse effects, such as cancer.

Bryce states we require due process, forbid the FDA from authorizing the proposed changes and demand that EUA is promptly revoked due to unreasonable risks in gene therapy products as evidenced by the large numbers of adverse events reports.  He also states COVID-19 vaccines fail to meet the requirements of EUA because not a single mRNA vaccine has been found to be effective for the prevention or treatment of an existing disease.

Some other sticky points:

“A thousand peer-reviewed studies question the safety of COVID-19 vaccines. Doesn’t anyone see the safety signals? Is there anyone here who will stand up?” he asked. “Some of you know this, you need to stand up and you need to help us.”

Another important quote:

“We have shown correlations between vaccination and all-cause mortality. FDA says VAERS is under- and misreported. A FOIA disclosure reveals that CDC has not conducted safety signal analyses, which we have provided to FDA. Neurologic adverse events are finally being acknowledged [but there are] still no cancer studies.”

“A Stanford study in [the journal] Cell showed vaccine message and antigen persisting for at least eight weeks. Does spike accumulate? Is this why myocarditis rates after boosting match or best primary series rates for some ages?

“Does spike persistence contribute to immune suppression, imprinting and negative efficacy? What is the toxicity of multiple doses? How will sameness of the manufacturing process be defined? Are the guidelines talking about monovalents or bivalents?” ~ Dr. David Wiseman, research scientist with a background in pharmacy, pharmacology and experimental pathology

____________________

**Comment**

Well this way they won’t have to deny and/or ignore those who pick apart the science, because now there simply isn’t any to pick apart.

BTW: the mantra the ‘powers that be’ continue to regurgitate is that these injections keep you from a severe case of COVID.  Now, a another study decimates this notion.

____________________

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/a-perpetual-pandemic-is-on-the-way

A Perpetual Pandemic is On the Way Thanks to Planned New COVID-19 Vaccines and FDA’s Insanity

FDA will allow Moderna & Pfizer to update the variants targeted by their mRNA injections and require no new studies. What’s even more insane? Their “updates” will ensure a Perpetual Pandemic.

James Lyons-Weiler

 

Did you know that in their insane new framework, US FDA will allow them to change variants w/no new science?

Also – the new vaccines will include mRNA encoding the original, extinct Wuhan-1 spike protein – ensuring a forever pandemic.

(See link for article)

For more: 

https://standforhealthfreedom.com/federal/public-comment/

The FDA’s policy of shots first, questions later, does not allow for informed consent

On June 28, 2022, FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) met to vote on COVID strain replacement in the shots. Stand for Health Freedom was selected to make oral public comment at the meeting. We took this opportunity to remind the federal government of American’s fundamental right to informed consent in medical decisions. This right does not disappear when a pandemic is declared. Listen and read below for full text of the comment made, with references.

Go here to listen to 3 Min. statement:  https://odysee.com/FDA_SHF_comment:56ddc5ccee578dd3558613d87fcff614a5405207?src=embed

Written prepared statement:

Thank you for this opportunity to comment. My name is Valerie Borek, I am Policy Analyst for Stand for Health Freedom, a national grassroots organization of over a half million Americans who are advocates for informed consent and no medical mandates.

Americans have a Constitutional right to informed consent. I urge you to uphold your mission to ensure safety and efficacy of COVID shots before voting on strain replacement without FDA-reviewed clinical trials.

Informed consent requires disclosure of risks, benefits, and alternatives, in terms a patient or guardian can understand – they must be able to ask questions and get answers from providers who have the information they need to answer those questions.

The FDA claims Americans aren’t entitled to informed consent for EUA products, but this is not true. Health professionals have a duty to their patients, including informed consent. EUA products are not fully approved by the FDA and are therefore experimental, requiring informed consent under US law.

In one of the first US Supreme Court Cases addressing COVID policy the Court affirmed that, quote, “We don’t cut the Constitution loose in a pandemic.” Chief Justice Roberts wrote, “As more medical and scientific evidence becomes available…courts should expect policies that more carefully account for constitutional rights.”[i] End quote.

Over the last two years the FDA has lowered their standards. Using antibody response instead of effectiveness when you do “not have the clinical data that we’d all love to have,” to quote Dr. Rubin in the April VRBPAC meeting[ii], is not legally, medically, or scientifically sound. Regarding waning immunity and boosters, Dr. Weir admitted, quote, “there’s just an awful lot we don’t know.” Dr. Meissner asked why SARS-CoV-2 mutates more than other viruses, and was told the spike protein in the shots is “driving the rate of evolution,” in other words, the shots made the mutations–yet the FDA has not investigated this. In CDC’s ACIP meeting on June 23, members asked about the difference between the Pfizer and Moderna formulations for our babies and toddlers, but no one could answer. This is not informed consent.

The FDA has not explored known potential risks, which is required for an EUA, and therefore cannot legally authorize any shots. The FDA is ignoring massive safety signals from VAERS, and reports of injury or death from shots, made in advisory committee meetings, in congressional hearings, and in the federal register. The shots were rushed at “Warp Speed,” with expedited FDA review, and clinical trials are ongoing through 2024. There is no long-term safety data for this novel mRNA technology.

The FDA has not addressed data fraud allegations made by Dr. Peter Doshi[iii], or Pfizer employee Brook Jackson[iv], nor has it answered US lawmaker concerns about authorization of shots for babies and toddlers. Studies were unblinded, confusing data, and eliminating controls. VRBPAC and ACIP members continually say they need more information about natural immunity and safety. How can the FDA tell parents or doctors that benefits outweigh the risks when you do not know the risks?

Even less is known about strain replacements for COVID shots. Americans need this missing data to make informed medical decisions. The more trustworthy your data, the more confidence Americans can have in your advice.

It is illegal for the FDA to authorize COVID shots without adequate safety or efficacy data. The FDA’s policy of shots first, questions later, does not allow for informed consent. On behalf of Stand for Health Freedom, I thank you for your time.

The advisory panel voted 19-2 to update the COVID boosters with the omicron strain genetic sequence. Check out the this Toby Rogers interview on CHD’s “Good Morning CHD” for a detailed recap of the meeting.

Take Action

Step One: Tell your governor to protect your family’s constitutional rights by standing up to federal overreach through public health agencies. The people can overrule the FDA and CDC!​

Take Action

Step Two: We can stop medical tyranny by voting people into office who will stand for health freedom! To have good candidates on the ballot in November, we must vote now in the primaries. Check out where your candidates stand using our Vote for Health Freedom Guide for your state! Go to our Vote for Health Freedom page, or Text the letters VHF to 52886, to learn about candidates in your area!

Go to Vote for Health Freedom

Step Three: If you appreciate the work we are doing here, please support us. We are 100% donor funded, by health freedom loving advocates like you.

Donate

References & Sources

[i] Roman Catholic 591 US ___2020, Dissenting opinion.

[ii] https://www.fda.gov/media/158030/download

[iii] https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/01/04/peter-doshi-pfizer-and-modernas-95-effective-vaccines-we-need-more-details-and-the-raw-data/

[iv] https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Fauci Gets COVID Yet Again After Taking Paxlovid, Proving the Drug that Cost Taxpayers $10.6 Billion is Worthless

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/fauci-covid-rebound-pfizer-paxlovid-taxpayers

Fauci Gets COVID Again After Taking Pfizer’s Treatment — the Drug That Cost Taxpayers $10.5 Billion

Dr. Anthony Fauci said Tuesday he is experiencing a rebound of COVID-19 symptoms after taking Paxlovid, Pfizer’s COVID-19 antiviral pill. Taxpayers are on the hook for $10.5 billion worth of the experimental treatment, under a deal the White House cut with Pfizer.

Excerpts:
Fauci tested positive for COVID-19 on June 15, despite being quadruple-vaccinated, initially experiencing “mild symptoms,” according to the NIAID.
Summary:
  • Due to his age he was put on a five day treatment of the expensive and rushed to market drug Paxlovid, which experts admit has a track record of causing a rebound of COVID, yet the CDC illogically continues to recommend it. Despite all common sense, logic, and science, the CDC will never in 1,000 years promote HCQ or ivermectin, vitamin C & D, and other effective, safe, cheap medications/supplements, just like they will never promote extended antibiotics for Lyme/MSIDS
  • Despite testing negative (as if that means anything) for three days in a row, Fauci reverted back to positive on the fourth day after treatment
  • His rebound felt worse than the first time he had COVID
  • Please know that while Biden’s “Test to Treat” initiative which supposedly allows Americans who test positive for COVID at a pharmacy to obtain “free” antiviral pills on the spot, these “free” pills have cost the U.S. taxpayer $10.6 BILLION.  
  • Dr. David Gortler, pharmacologist, pharmacist, FDA and healthcare policy oversight fellow and FDA reform advocate at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, questions why the government continues to invest in Paxlovid given it’s lack of performance.  He then rips the Pfizer study to shreds:
    • While Pfizer claims the drug reduces hospitalization and death by nearly 90% in people with mild to moderate infections, nearly everyone who gets the existing COVID mutation will have mild or moderate disease. 
    • Pfizer limited its study to people who were unvaccinated and who faced the greatest risk from the virus
    • An updated more recent analysis from 1,153 patients (out of a possible 2,246) showed a non-significant 51% relative risk reduction.
    • Gortler wants to know why Biden gambled every tax dollar on ONE single drug from ONE single drugmaker, Pfizer, “…when they could have spent almost nothing and promoted the established safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin with an established, superior outcome.”

Please see this powerful FLCCC graphic comparing Paxlovid vs ivermectin.

Pfizer stands to make $54 billion in sales in 2022 from its vaccine and Paxlovid, The Defender reported in March.

Category:

Activism, Treatment, vaccines, Viruses

Case Report: Multifocal Necrotizing Encephalitis and Myocarditis after COVID Shot

https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202206.0308/v1

A Case Report: Multifocal Necrotizing Encephalitis and Myocarditis after BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccination against Covid-19

Michael Mörz
Version 1 : Received: 21 June 2022 / Approved: 22 June 2022 / Online: 22 June 2022 (07:53:57 CEST)

How to cite: Mörz, M. A Case Report: Multifocal Necrotizing Encephalitis and Myocarditis after BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccination against Covid-19. Preprints 2022, 2022060308 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202206.0308.v1). Mörz, M. A Case Report: Multifocal Necrotizing Encephalitis and Myocarditis after BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccination against Covid-19. Preprints 2022, 2022060308 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202206.0308.v1).

Abstract

The current report represents a case of a 77-year-old man with Parkinson’s disease who died three weeks after receiving his third COVID-19 vaccination in January 2022. The patient was first vaccinated in May 2021 with the ChAdOx1 nCov- 19 vector vaccine, followed by two more doses with the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in July and December 2021. The family of the deceased requested an autopsy due to the ambivalent clinical features noted before death. The underlying illness (Parkinson’s disease) was confirmed by autopsy. However, no sign of a florid COVID-19 was discovered. Meanwhile, the immunohistochemical staining of the brain and heart revealed previously undiagnosed conditions. The brain, in distinctive, revealed multifocal necrotizing encephalitis with massive inflammatory lymphocyte infiltrates. In addition, the heart showed signs of serious myocarditis. Finally, immunohistochemical staining revealed that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein was evident in the tissues investigated. Based on these immunohistochemical findings, it appears that the inflammatory changes in the patient’s brain tissues are most likely the result of immunological processes. Concurrently, the absence of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid-protein was evidenced, indicating that the detected spike-protein is unrelated to a SARS-CoV-2 infection. If such an infection was the cause of the spike protein, the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein would also be detectable. As a consequence, the confirmed presence of the spike protein had to be attributed to the previous vaccination with the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine that the deceased patient had received.
___________________
**Comment**
Finally autopsies are being done, despite Fauci telling everyone NOT do autopsies.
This case report is important for  the following reasons:
  1. there is Lyme-associated Parkinsonism
  2. necrotizing encephalitis is also related to tick-borne infections, both viral and bacterial
  3. Inflammation is common with tick-borne illness
  4. Myocarditis is also associated with tick-borne illness
  5. Finding the spike protein in the tissues investigated puts to rest the fact it goes systemically into the body, and not only the injected arm.  This was admitted by a vaccine researcher over a year ago but is still denied/ignored by ‘the powers that be’
    1. It accumulates in ovaries, the liver, spleen, bone marrow, and adrenal glands
    2. It can bind to receptors that are on our platelets & the cells that line our blood vessels
    3. It can cause platelets to clump, leading to clotting, or bleeding which explains the many reports of heart issues after these injections
    4. It crosses the blood, brain barrier and can cause neurological damage
  6. Not having the nucleocapsid-protein ruled COVID infection out, leaving the only reason for the presence of the toxic protein to be due to the injection which led directly to this man’s death

Category:

Heart Issues, research, vaccines, Viruses