Weaponized Ticks/Human Experiments/The Lyme Disease Truth with Kris Newby
With Chris Mathieu
Forbidden Knowledge News
The censorship mentioned is very real. I was just kicked off LinkedIn. It’s going to be harder to find information that does not follow the accepted narrative spun out by our public ‘authorities’ and main stream media whom have severe conflicts of interest.
We are indebted to all of Newby’s work. She is behind the documentaries “Under Our Skin”and “Emergence” which accurately portray what Lyme/MSIDS patients experience. I diagnosed myself and my husband by watching these.
Lastly, here’s a short piece of Willy Burgdorfer shortly before he died where he candidly explains Lyme/MSIDS is far from a simple illness and is nearly impossible to find.
Newly obtained emails offer glimpses into how a narrative of certainty developed about the natural origins of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, while key scientific questions remained. The internal discussions and an early draft of a scientists’ letter show experts discussing gaps in knowledge and unanswered questions about lab origin, even as some sought to tamp down on “fringe” theories about the possibility the virus came from a lab.
The final letter published Feb. 6 did not mention binding sites or the possibility of a laboratory origin.
A few weeks later, the NASEM presidents’ letter appeared as an authoritative source for an influential scientists’ statement published in The Lancet that conveyed far more certainty about the origins of SARS-CoV-2. USRTK previously reported that EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak drafted that statement, which asserted that “scientists from multiple countries…overwhelmingly conclude that this coronavirus originated in wildlife.” This position, the statement notes, is “further supported by a letter from the presidents of the US National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine.”
No less than three out of four reappearances of SARS have been attributed to safety breaches.
Considering the potential for a massively lethal pandemic, I believe it’s safe to say that BSL 3 and 4 laboratories pose a very real and serious existential threat to humanity.
U.S. biowarfare programs employ some 13,000 scientists,40 all of whom are hard at work creating ever-deadlier pathogens, while the public is simply told to trust that these pathogens will never be released, either involuntarily or voluntarily.
With sufficient evidence, certain researchers and public health authorities could face life behind bars for their involvement, which is the penalty for bioterrorism under the Anti-Terrorism Act. All things considered, there’s virtually no benefit to gain-of-function research, but plenty of risk.
Radiation From Wireless Devices May Cause Breast Cancer, New Study Shows
A meta-analysis of eight studies reveals that exposure to radiation from cell phones, iPads and laptops significantly increases the risk of breast cancer, especially for women over 50.
A new meta-analysis study reveals that exposure to radiation from wireless devices such as cell phones, iPads and laptops significantly increases the risk of breast cancer.
The meta-analysis study (a statistical analysis that combines the results of multiple scientific studies) examined eight studies that were published between 1996-2015. The highest risk was found in women over 50.
There are many studies that can provide a causal mechanism. For example, it has been shown that exposure to radio frequency (RF) radiation (the radiation emitted from wireless devices) may cause a decrease in melatonin production, and studies have demonstrated that reduced melatonin levels may lead to breast cancer.
Dr. John West, a breast cancer specialist, has published case studies which provide clinical support to these findings. West published some of these cases in a 2013 paper, “Multifocal Breast Cancer in Young Women with Prolonged Contact between Their Breasts and Their Cellular Phones.” These cases reveal breast cancer in women under 40 even though breast cancer is rare in women that young when there is no family history or genetic predisposition.
Four cases of women ages 21 to 39 show multifocal invasive breast cancer. The spread of the tumors and the fact that all of these women reported carrying their smartphones in their bra suggests a possible association with exposure to radiation from cell phones.
West recently joined the advisory board of Physicians for Safe Technology, an organization of physicians and health professionals whose mission is to provide trusted leadership in promoting safer use of technology.
Other doctors report similar findings. In a video posted by Kevin Kunze, producer of the movie “Mobilize,” Dr. Robert Nagourney presents the case of one of his patients, Donna, a young healthy athletic woman who kept her cell phone in her bra and developed breast cancer. The spread of the tumors in her breast resembles the shape of the cell phone.
A 10-year study by the U.S. government found clear evidence that cell phones cause cancer. The study was conducted by the National Toxicology Program(NTP), the U.S. expert agency on toxins, and it was the biggest study of its kind. The results were confirmed by another major study by a leading scientific body, the Ramazzini Institute.
Nevertheless, the Federal Communication Commission (FCC), which is entrusted with regulating the impact of wireless technology on health, dismissed the results of the study and refused to review its 1996 guidelines that deny adverse health effects of wireless technology. In February 2020, Children’s Health Defense filed a lawsuit against the FCC challenging the FCC’s decision not to review the guidelines. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit will hear oral arguments in the case on Jan. 25, 2021.
Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. CHD is implementing many strategies, including legal, in an effort to defend the health of our children and obtain justice for those already injured. Your support is essential to CHD’s successful mission.
FDA-approved pain medicines are dangerous, but the government is systematically attacking safer, non-addictive natural treatments. Action Alert!
A recent study in Switzerland found that acetaminophen poisoning increased by 40% following the approval of 1,000mg doses. This is just the latest data to indicate the public health problems caused by this commonly used pain drug, which is the active ingredient in Tylenol.
Despite the dangers of FDA-approved pain drugs, the federal government aggressively attacks and censors natural pain medicines like homeopathic treatments, CBD, medical foods, and supplements. This needless suffering must end.
We’ve written for years about the dangers of acetaminophen. It is the most commonly prescribed class of drugs despite causing50 percent of all liver failure in the US. According to the FDA’s adverse event database, acetaminophen has caused more than 100,000 adverse events and more than 78,000 serious adverse events, including 24,000 deaths. It has also been linked to asthma and hearing loss.
Now consider the federal government’s approach to natural pain medicines. The FDA essentially banned all injectable homeopathic medicines, which includes Traumeel, a prescription-only homeopathic medicine for pain with an extremely robust safety profile.
Previously, the FDA went after Limbrel, a medical food for the treatment of osteoarthritis. In a letter to Primus, the FDA stated that 194 adverse event reports for Limbrel were received between 2007 and 2017—about 20 a year.
Then, of course, there’s CBD. The federal government’s approach to CBD right now is frankly a mess, and we’ve sifted through the details in previous coverage. In short, hemp and its derivatives have been legalized at the federal level, but FDA laws still apply to products containing hemp, such as supplements, lotions, cosmetics, etc. Since 2018, the FDA has been trying to figure out how it will treat these products. Recall, too, that the agency has approved a CBD drug, and according to FDA rules, this means that CBD cannot legally be sold as a supplement.
We ultimately don’t know how the FDA will treat CBD supplements. If history provides any clues, the FDA will protect the drug-approval process and ban CBD supplements. To add to the confusion, Congress is directing the FDA to release an interim policy (called a policy of enforcement discretion) explaining how it will treat CBD products in the marketplace as the agency develops its final regulatory framework. Will the FDA release an interim policy that allows CBD supplements for the time being before banning them outright when a final policy is released? We just don’t know, but we should assume that the FDA will not do the right thing, especially when Big Pharma profits are at stake.
It is unconscionable, but unsurprising, that the FDA would reduce access to safe, non-addictive alternatives to dangerous opioid drugs that killed 30,000 people in 2018 alone. We’ve also seen basic information on natural health censored to protect drug industry profits during the COVID-19 pandemic. This cronyism has to stop.
Action Alert! Write to Congress and the FDA, telling them to issue a policy of enforcement discretion that protects consumer access to hemp-derived CBD supplements at therapeutic levels and full-spectrum hemp oil. Please send your message immediately. By sending this message, you will also be supporting our petition to ungag doctors so that they can share with patients the benefits of supplements and natural treatments for COVID.
____________________
**Comment**
Our government shuts down anything that competes with its own lucrative products.
This blog post is part of our People to Highlight Series during our 2020 Year-End Appeal. Each week we’ll be spotlighting a GLA community member who has helped to advance our mission. To support GLA during our year-end appeal, donate here.
FIGHTING BACK: MY HEALING JOURNEY
by Bill Beesmer
When I was four years old, my dad died, leaving behind sixteen children for my mother to raise alone. We lived in a small house with no indoor plumbing. I do not know how my mother, who was pregnant when our father died, found the strength and resources to raise, feed, and clothe all of us. I refuse to allow a poorly diagnosed case of Lyme disease to take me out without a fight. I owe that to my mother, myself, and every person who has been impacted by this disease. I am honored to share my story.
In 2013 during the July Fourth weekend, two significant events occurred. I turned seventy years old, and I also found an engorged tick on my bathroom floor. I live alone and I do not have pets, so I assume the tick had been on me as I had just spent days doing yard work. The next business day, I took the tick and myself to my general practitioner (GP). I had no sign of a rash or an entry location, so doxycycline was not prescribed, and the tick was not sent to a lab for testing. In hindsight, these were huge mistakes. I did not know any better and neither did my GP.
Within a few weeks, I developed excruciating pain in my lower back and buttocks requiring a rescue squad trip to the emergency room. This happened twice, and I was never tested for Lyme, even though I told the doctors about the tick. Shortly after that, I developed pain and weakness on my right side from my ribs to my toes. Within five weeks, my right side atrophied, and I lost 40 pounds. The back pain never abated or lessened. I was in constant agony. Finally, my GP sent me to a neurosurgeon who ordered an MRI of my thoracic spine, a CAT scan, and an EMG. The neurologist that performed the EMG wrote in his report that I had experienced diabetic neuropathy. Having been a type II diabetic for over 50 years, this did not make sense to me. Later, a neurologist and an infectious disease doctor refuted this, agreeing it was tick-borne disease related.
My deterioration continued, and In February of 2014, I had my severely swollen right knee aspirated by an orthopedic surgeon. Knowing about the tick encounter, the surgeon had my knee fluid tested. Tests were positive for Lyme. That is how and when I learned I had Lyme disease.
In the following months and years, I saw many doctors, including a neurologist, an infectious disease doctor at Mass General Hospital in Boston, and two “Lyme-literate” doctors. The infectious disease doctor ordered a spinal tap, and my spinal fluid tested positive for Lyme disease. My treatment was a PICC line placed in my right arm to receive 28 consecutive days of Rocephin infusions. My last infusion was in February 2020.
Since July 2013, I have spent more than $30,000 on out-of-pocket medical expenses. This includes supplements, blood tests, and doctor visits not covered by insurance, primarily because Lyme-literate doctors do not accept insurance. It stings to have to write a check for Lyme diagnosis and treatment. This is happening to hundreds of thousands (maybe millions) of people tolerating Lyme and other co-infections with limited resources. This disease needs to be covered by insurance.
I first learned of Global Lyme Alliance (GLA) when searching online for a dynamic Lyme organization. I reviewed several Lyme groups’ history and financial statements. I was looking for a trustworthy nonprofit organization where I could confidently donate to Lyme research. After examining GLA’s financial statements and speaking with key staff members, GLA rose to the top of my list very quickly.
Global Lyme Alliance has been helpful to me in many ways. The staff has always responded promptly to my many questions, often directing me to research sites, articles and informing me of medical advances. A few years ago, GLA invited me to a Lyme research summit for donors. The presenters were doctors, scientists, and clinical researchers from hospitals and medical schools throughout the United States. I was impressed to learn that GLA grants had funded much of their work due to donations made possible by GLA donors like me. The summit was a fantastic experience. Lyme had taken so much from me, and I needed to know people were fighting back.
Given the rampant spread of Lyme disease and co-infections with no current cure, I decided to get involved and do more. When I was asked to become a GLA Lyme Education Ambassador, it was the icing on the cake. I have learned so much about Lyme disease and the advances being made. To this day, I often call GLA staff with questions or for guidance. They are always there to help.
Bill speaking at Onteora High School in Boiceville, NY
I am honored to help educate people in my area, the beautiful Hudson Valley, and raise Lyme disease awareness. I disburse GLA posters and flyers, I speak at social clubs and schools, and wherever I can find an audience. The pandemic has curtailed all that, so we have had to find creative ways to raise funds for these programs and much-needed research. I want to thank my family and friends, who helped me generate over $75,000 while fundraising for GLA in 2019.
I am sure that you know somebody who has experienced the devastating impact of Lyme disease and how helpless they felt. Look at what my mom was capable of when it seemed like there was no help in sight. She taught me how to fight for what was right, which is exactly what I am doing. I ask you to join forces with me and GLA to make meaningful progress on Lyme patients’ behalf. It is never too late to help. Your contribution will make a difference. Thank you for stepping up.
