Archive for the ‘Activism’ Category

Fauci Knew in 2020 Research He Backed May Have Led to COVID, FOIA Shows

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/tucker-carlson-fauci-committed-perjury-might-be-under-criminal-investigation-already

Tucker Carlson: Fauci committed perjury, might be under criminal investigation already

The Fox News host cited emails obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request indicating the president’s chief medical adviser knew in early 2020 that research he backed may have led to the creation of COVID-19.
Thu Jun 3, 2021 
Featured Image

June 3, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – Tucker Carlson slammed Dr. Anthony Fauci, chief medical adviser to the president, on Wednesday, saying Fauci lied under oath and may be under criminal investigation based on recently released emails. 

Earlier this week, The Washington Post and Buzzfeed News published a trove of emails to and from Dr. Fauci obtained through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The messages show that Fauci knew in early 2020 that COVID-19 may have been engineered and appeared to express fears about research he supported that may have led to the creation of the virus.

“The utter fraudulence of Tony Fauci is obvious now, and it’s widely acknowledged,” Tucker Carlson said. “But it was not always obvious. In March of last year, we interviewed Fauci on this show. We treated him with respect. We took his answers seriously.”

“It soon became clear that Tony Fauci was just another sleazy federal bureaucrat — deeply political and often dishonest,” Carlson continued.

“More shocking, we then learned that Fauci himself was implicated in the very pandemic he’d been charged with fighting,” he said, apparently referring to “gain-of-function” experiments at a laboratory in Wuhan, China funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), which Dr. Fauci has led for decades. The NIAID is a division of the National Institutes of Health.

The new emails “show that from the beginning, Fauci was worried the public might conclude that COVID originated at the Wuhan Institute of Virology,” Carlson said. “Why was Fauci be concerned that Americans would conclude that? Possibly because Tony Fauci knew perfectly well he’d funded gain-of-function experiments at that same laboratory.”

“The emails prove Fauci lied about this under oath,” he concluded, pointing to an email from Kristian Andersen, a professor with the Scripps Research Institute who informed Fauci last January that the virus may well be man-made.  (See link for article)

_________________________

**UPDATE**

This email from Dr. Peter Daszak, researcher and President of the EcoHealth Alliance, a group that has extensive ties to the Wuhan lab gain of function research, thanks Fauci for dismissing the lab-leaked theory, despite many researchers saying it looked engineered.

According to this, a February 2020 email between Dr. Anthony Fauci and former Obama health and human services (HHS) secretary Sylvia Burwell, the nation’s top infectious disease expert said that store-bought face masks weren’t very effective in protecting one against COVID-19.  He turns out to have been correct, as several analyses – including the CDC’s own data – have shown that mask mandates (and double masking) have virtually no effect on virus spread, sentiment echoed by top epidemiologists.  Yet, the entire nation was told to wear masks.

ICAN just posted 3,000 emails sent by Fauci from early Feb. 2020 through May 2020.  These emails contain his comments on masks, therapeutics, vaccines, ventilators and other topics.  ICAN painstakingly sifted through these and give these highlights.

Read Fauci’s emails here and see a news story about it here.
  • February 5-6, 2020 (000239) – Fauci asked to recommend names for WHO group with the broad mission to “look at the origins and evolution of 2019n-CoV.”  Fauci responds by seeking to reframe the mission in a manner that would only look for natural and not lab made origin. 
 
  • February 7, 2020 (000189) – Fauci sent an internal NIAID communication reflecting that it was unlikely that the SARS-CoV-2 virus originated in a wet market. 
 
  • February 16, 2020 (000447) – Fauci tells CBS reporter that if the mortality turns out to be 0.2% to 0.4%, then SARS-CoV-2 should be treated like a severe seasonal flu.  But when the case fatality rate was later revised to between 0.2% and 0.4% by the CDC, Fauci continued to act as if the virus was something far more dangerous.
 
  • February 17, 2020 (000422) – Fauci receives communication from a Chinese citizen that is part of an international student program in the United States stating that, based on his contacts back in Wuhan, including correspondence from a nurse working in a Wuhan hospital, there is far more spread of the virus and far more deaths than China is admitting.
 
  • February 21, 2020 (000300) – Fauci asks a Deputy Director at NIAID to “Please handle” an email received by a group of doctors and scientists, including a virologist, that opined that “we think there is a possibility that the virus was released from a lab in wuhan (sic).”
 
  • February 23, 2020 (000257) – Fauci states “Transmission is definitely by respiratory droplet” and that “Children have very low rate of infection.” 
 
  • February 22, 2020 (000274-277) – Fauci confirms that “The vast majority of people outside of China do not need to wear a mask.  A mask is more appropriate for someone who is infected than for people trying to protect against infection.”
 
  • February 27, 2020 (000649) – Fauci tells Morgan Fairchild to tell her followers to be ready for “social distancing, teleworking, temporary closure of schools, etc.”
 
  • February 28, 2020 (001054) – Fauci, while uncertain what animal may have served as the intermediary jump from bats to humans for SARS-CoV-2, keeps repeating the narrative that it was a jump from bats through some natural non-lab means that was the origin of the virus.
 
  • February 28, 2020 (001059) – Fauci giving personal update to Mark Zuckerberg regarding developing a COVID-19 vaccine including telling Zuckerberg that “We may need help with resources” and that if there is a delay in the development timeline he just told Zuckerberg about, “I will contact you.”
 
  • March 1, 2020 (000922) – CBS’s Chief Medical Correspondent, seeking to please Fauci, emails Fauci a link to his segment which he appears to repeat what Fauci has told him, including that face masks “may give some partial protection by catching droplets containing virus but the virus is so tiny the virus can go right through it or around it” and describing the origin of the virus as “jumping from animals to people.”  Fauci responds with “Outstanding!!” apparently pleased that CBS pushed Fauci’s narrative that the virus was a natural jump from bats to humans.
 
  • March 1, 2020 (000937) – Despite media reports, Fauci makes it crystal clear he was not being muzzled by the White House.
 
  • March 16, 2020 (001554) – Fauci is asked “Given the relative safety of all but the elderly and those whose immune systems are compromised, and that they are far fewer than the rest of the population, why not quarantine only them?” and responds by stating “Stay tuned.”
 
  • March 17, 2020 (001537) – The next day, it does not appear Fauci intends to change his tune of pushing everyone, even healthy people with low risk of the virus, to give up all civil liberties and remain prisoners in their home, as reflecting in an email exchange between Fauci and Mark Zuckerberg, in which they share mobile numbers and plan to coordinate efforts to get people to comply with Fauci’s messaging, including social distancing for everyone, but the details of their plan are not included in the email exchange.
 
  • March 31, 2020 (001816) – Fauci receives a summary from his agency of the studies regarding how effective masks are to preventing the virus and the conclusion is as follows: “Bottom line: generally there were not differences in ILI/URI/or flu rates when masks were used.” 
 
  • April 2, 2020 (001778) – Fauci and Bill Gates have phone call where they agreed to a “collaborative” and “synergistic approach to COVID-19 on the part of NIAID/NIH, BARDS and the BMGF (Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation).”  It is concerning that one private person, Bill Gates, and his organization, BMGF, can exert that much behind-the-scenes influence on decisions that will impact the civil rights of all Americans during the pandemic.
 
  • April 8, 2020 (002351-2352) – Fauci, rejects most requests for calls, but accepts without any questions a request to arrange a call with the CEO of a Lilly, a major pharmaceutical company.
 
  • April 11, 2020 (002263-2264) – While Fauci claimed to have little time for anything else, Fauci confirmed the continued filming of “a film that will celebrate the importance of your [Fauci’s] life, science and public health” including filming during his “drive to NIH … once or twice a week,” “capture your working/appropriate conversations,” and “work on the Task Force.”
 
  • April 12, 2020 (002229) – Fauci writes “Many tests that have been used thus far are not accurate and ARE MISLEADING.”
 
  • April 16, 2020 (002142) – Fauci advises that even in the health care setting the mask policy should remain “voluntary.”
 
  • April 20, 2020 (002548-2549) – A Washington Post reporter contacts Katie Miller at NIAID for copies of article that Fauci stated are proof that the virus originated by natural means rather than being developed in a lab.  Instead of letting Katie Miller or someone on his staff respond, Fauci, who stated he gets 1,000 or 2,000 emails per day and only has time to respond to a tiny number of these emails, personally responds to the Washington Post reporter (who did not even write to Fauci) with the copies of the studies.
 
  • April 22, 2020 (002471-2472) – The National Academy of Science representative confirming to Dr. Francis Collins, head of NIH, that “WHO, Gates Foundation and European Commission have been leading and planning” the “global coordinating effort to accelerate vaccines, diagnostics and therapeutics” and that “there will be an announcement on the global structure with will [sic] involve Gates, WHO etc.” and Fauci explains in an email that “we have Gates reps on our ACTIV (Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines) working groups.”  Why is an unelected individual with his own private interests getting this incredible level of influence over decisions that will affect the freedoms and liberties of everyday Americans?
 
  • April 27, 2020 (002910) – Fauci appears to dismiss potential live saving treatment.  Fauci receives a report from the Chief, Section of Viral Pathogenesis at NIAID, Dr. Paolo Lussa, that “they treated a first group of five patients with potent anti-aggregant therapy (Tirofiban/Aggrastat) and apparently in all of them the p02 started to rise within less than 2 hours, they got off the ventilator and went on to full recovery.”  In response to this incredible news, Fauci merely writes “Thanks, Paolo.”  Apart from pushing Remdesivir, made by Gilead, a company with which Fauci has deep and long-standing connections, Fauci’s response to Dr. Lussa accords with his otherwise singular focus on developing and pushing a vaccine.
 
  • May 1, 2020 (002838) – While pushing one narrative regarding ventilators publicly, Fauci writes in a private email that “You are correct in that there is a more recent tendency to use ventilators only as a very last resort since oxygenation rather than ventilation appears to be key to recovery

Harvard Medical School Lyme Disease Survey

https://hms.az1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_eKeMMApsqAnfuPY  Survey Here

iu-115

TAKE OUR LYME DISEASE PATIENT EXPERIENCE SURVEY! 

The Lyme Disease Education Initiative at Harvard Medical School would like to hear your Lyme disease story. Survey participants will answer questions about their experience with Lyme disease and about the types of information that could help others with Lyme disease to navigate their illness and improve their quality of life. We will use the survey results to help shape educational materials for Lyme disease patients and the general public.

If you are an adult living in the US who has been diagnosed with Lyme disease by a medical professional, you may be able to help. Answer the screening questions below to see if you qualify.

COVID “Vaccine” Less Than 1% Effective?

https://thehighwire.com/videos/covid-vaccine-less-than-1-effective/  8 Min. Video Here

POSTED: May 28, 2021

COVID “VACCINE” LESS THAN 1% EFFECTIVE?!

When it comes to Covid vaccines, what does “95% effective” really mean? Dr. Jim Meehan breaks down Relative Risk vs. Absolute Risk, and how Big Pharma manipulates the data on the absolute effectiveness of these failed vaccines, which leads the media and public into a false sense of security.

For more:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2&v=Jkwn5I8tLmE&feature=emb_logo  Video Approx. 32 Min

Dr. Ron Brown, April 2021

ABSOLUTE VERSUS RELATIVE RISK REDUCTION 

CORRECTION: THE FOLLOWING GRAPHIC REPLACES THE GRAPHIC IN THE VIDEO AT 5:44. Image: https://www.mdpi.com/medicina/medicin… Dr. Ron Brown of Waterloo University talks about his Cambridge and Medicina Paper. We discuss relative risk reduction and absolute risk reduction measures in the evaluation of clinical trial data. Dr. Ron Brown discusses the danger of outcome reporting bias and the misleading conclusions and violations of informed consent from outcome reporting bias in COVID-19 mRNA vaccine clinical trials.

Articles Referenced: https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/57/3/199 https://www.cambridge.org/core/servic…

Based on data reported by the manufacturer for Pfzier/BioNTech vaccine BNT162b2:

  • relative risk reduction: 95.1%; 95% CI, 90.0% to 97.6%; p = 0.016;
  • absolute risk reduction: 0.7%; 95% CI, 0.59% to 0.83%; p < 0.000.

For the Moderna vaccine mRNA-1273:

  • relative risk reduction: 94.1%; 95% CI, 89.1% to 96.8%; p = 0.004
  • absolute risk reduction, 1.1%; 95% CI, 0.97% to 1.32%; p < 0.000

Unreported absolute risk reduction measures of 0.7% and 1.1% for the Pfzier/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines, respectively, are very much lower than the reported relative risk reduction measures. Reporting absolute risk reduction measures is essential to prevent outcome reporting bias in evaluation of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy. View Full-Text

Peter Doshi, associate editor of The BMJ, pointed out that while Pfizer claims its vaccine is 95% effective, this is the relative risk reduction.

THE ABSOLUTE RISK REDUCTION — WHICH IS FAR MORE RELEVANT FOR PUBLIC HEALTH MEASURES — IS ACTUALLY LESS THAN 1%!

Remember what our corrupt public health officials told us?

These shots don’t do diddly but have the potential to kill or maim you.

But, the band plays on…..

Tick Time Bomb: Why Experts Predict High Tick Activity in 2021

https://www.prevention.com/health/a36558703/tick-time-bomb-summer-2021/

Experts Predict Summer 2021 Will Be a ‘Tick Time Bomb’—Here’s How to Stay Safe

“We are already seeing more ticks this season than last year.”
ticks

RBKOMARGETTY IMAGES
  • Experts predict summer 2021 will be a “tick time bomb.”
  • Due to a mild winter, most parts of the country are already seeing more ticks this season than last year, as the tiny insects thrive in humidity.
  • Here’s how to protect yourself from tick bites, which can lead to various illnesses including Lyme disease.

Every summer, we hear the same warning: It’s going to be a bad year for ticks. But entomologists (a.k.a. insect experts) say that 2021 could live up to that message. In fact, The Weather Channel even referred to this year as a “tick time bomb.”

Robert Lockwood, associate certified entomologist for Ehrlich Pest Control, says experts are already noticing a thriving tick population in 2021. “Due to the mild winters and climate change, we are already seeing more ticks this season than last year,” he says.

Why does a wet winter matter? Ticks thrive in humidity. As a result, “regions that experienced wetter and warmer winters will have higher tick populations this spring and summer,” says Ben Hottel, Ph.D., technical services manager for Orkin.  (See link for article)

_____________________

For more:

  • https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/11/07/ticks-on-the-move-due-to-migrating-birds-and-photoperiod-not-climate-change/
    • Climate-change researchers overlooked and did not take into account established populations of I. scapularis found in the late 1960’s in the upper Midwest, as well as at Manitoba in 1991, in their climate change model maps. The faulty climate change maps are devoid of any ticks in those areas – yet experience shows otherwise.
    • Climate change models overlook the fact that deer ticks were established in northwestern Ontario, southern Manitoba and were already in central Canada prior to 1970. What they predict to happen in the future has already happened in Canada. Their oversight caused a skewed rate of tick expansion and a miscalculation of northward projected movement.
    • Warmer winters are in fact lethal to I. scapularis(black-legged) ticks. In fact, overwinter survival dropped to 33% when the snow melted. This has been substantiated by other researchers as well.
    • The climate change model actually reflects migratory flight not warmer futuristic temperatures.
    • What is important to tick expansion is photoperiod, which is innate and can not be altered by climate.  Black-legged ticks require 14 hours of daylight to molt. If ticks can’t molt, they can’t move on to their next life-cycle.

      “The hypothesis that I. scapularis ticks will expand further north in the Prairie Provinces because of climate change is not only unscientific, but deceiving.”  John Scott, Independent tick researcher

More on tick prevention:

COVID Doctor: Big-Gov/Big-Pharma Suppression of Ivermectin Cost 500,000 Lives

**UPDATE Aug. 21, 2021**

Due to denial, suppression, and censorship of ivermectin by mainstream medicine, our corrupt public health ‘authorities’, and bought-out media, people are now forced to self-treat with ivermectin using animal medicine, causing a surge in poisonings.  (This type of thing happens in Lyme-land as well for the same reasons)

https://thenewamerican.com/covid-doctor-big-gov-big-pharma-suppression-of-ivermectin-cost-500000-lives/?

COVID Doctor: Big-Gov/Big-Pharma Suppression of Ivermectin Cost 500,000 Lives

COVID Doctor: Big-Gov/Big-Pharma Suppression of Ivermectin Cost 500,000 Lives
Photo: RapidEye/iStock/Getty Images Plus

Last month, renowned physician Dr. Peter McCullough lamented that thousands of lives have been lost because the medical establishment has refused to create an “official treatment protocol” for COVID-19. Now another doctor is expressing similar sentiments, saying the World Health Organization (WHO) has purposely suppressed data on drug ivermectin’s effectiveness at treating the disease because the health authority is in Big Pharma’s pocket.

It’s a trespass that has cost a half million lives, contends critical-care physician Dr. Pierre Kory — and he calls the act “criminal.” As the World Tribune reports:

In a recent Zoom call, Dr. Pierre Kory of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance outlined numerous details showing the World Health Organization (WHO) knowingly suppressed data on the effectiveness of ivermectin against the virus in order to benefit the vaccine interests of Big Pharma.

“It’s criminal,” Kory said. “It’s literally criminal.” The drug “could have saved half a million lives this year if it had been approved.”

The WHO, Kory contends, is simply taking part in the tactics of a time-worn “Disinformation Playbook.” The term was coined by the Union of Concerned Scientists 50 years ago to describe the strategies corporations have developed over decades to “attack science when it goes against their financial interests.”

According to the Tribune, this disinformation strategy has five parts:

1. The Fake – Conduct counterfeit science and try to pass it off as legitimate research.

2. The Blitz – Harass scientists who speak out with results reviews inconvenient for industry.

3. The Diversion – Manufacture uncertainty about science where little or none exists.

4. The Screen – Buy credibility through alliances with academia or professional societies.

5. The Fix – Manipulate government officials or processes to influence policy inappropriately.

“In the full Zoom call, since removed by YouTube but available on Bitchute , Kory describes how the five tactics have been deployed against the scientific findings on ivermectin,” the Tribune continues. “One example is the corruption of leading medical journals, whose editors refuse to allow ivermectin studies to advance to peer review. The most egregious institutional participant, however, is the WHO.”  (See link for article)

_______________________
**Comment**
 
Please read this important article in full.  If you have the time, also watch the videos. The monkeys are rolling out of the barrel one by one and this information must be shared widely because it’s truly a wide-spread problem which doesn’t only concern the issue of COVID.
 
This article also explains why Lyme/MSIDS patients have suffered for over 40 years. The same exact 5 parts deployed in the disinformation playbook have been and are currently being used for tick-borne illness (TBIs).  
Dr. Kory states 500,000 lives could have been saved and Dr. McCullough states 85% of the lives lost could have been saved.
The question begging to be asked is: I wonder how many lives could have been saved of those with tick-borne illness if they were allowed appropriate anti-microbial treatment that treated ALL the pathogens for the duration of time needed?

Interestingly, the article mentions USSR’s Lysenkoism, and that the problem is worsened “when there’s an unhealthy nexus between science and state.”  These same words have been uttered by microbiologist Sin Hang Lee due to the fact the CDC has suppressed  direct testing methods for Lyme disease.  He also filed a “Stay of Action” against the Pfizer COVID “vaccine,” due to the faulty PCR tests used in the trials.

Lee is far from alone.  Lyme advocate Carl Tuttle recently gave ample evidence that the CDC is lying to the public about Lyme disease.

If a silver lining exists to the COVID ‘pandemic’ it’s that blatant corruption is finally being acknowledged and exposed. Perhaps this awareness will help suffering patients understand the need to seek specialists that have separated themselves from this corrupt paradigm and truly desire to help patients.

For a great read from New York Times best-selling author and journalist Michael Capuzzo who detailed the manner in which Ivermectin came to be used to treat COVID-19, and simultaneously subjected to global censorship despite its incredibly high success rate at treating the virus:  https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/The-Drug-that-Cracked-Covid-by-Michael-Capuzzo.pdf

Ivermectin is “what the world desperately needs now,” according to Dr. Pierre Kory, one of the founding members of the FLCCC. But although the desperate need is present, governing health bodies apparently seem intent on ensuring that the drug is not known, Capuzzo reveals. 

For more:  https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/prominent-physicians-scientists-believe-u.s-doctors-group-deserves-nobel-prize-for-finding-most-powerful-covid-19-killer-known-to-science