Wisconsin sees ticks active months ahead of schedule
By Margaret Faust | Wisconsin Public Radio
March 16, 2024
Adult ticks, approximately half of whom are infected with the bacteria that causes Lyme disease, are ready to feed earlier than usual this year.
The Wisconsin Department of Health Services and the Midwest Center of Excellence for Vector-Borne Diseases at the University of Wisconsin-Madison started to look for ticks in February, almost two months ahead of schedule.
Experts said the results were not unexpected given the unseasonably warm weather. The arachnids become active when temperatures are above 40 degrees and there is a lack of snow cover.
Lyric Bartholomay is a professor in the department of pathobiological sciences at UW-Madison. She recently spoke with WPR’s “The Morning Show” about the early start to tick season.
“It is sort of upsetting, right? Because it’s just so early,” Bartholomay said. (See link for article)
Independent research has shown the climate has nothing to do with tick and disease proliferation. In fact, warm winters are lethaltoI. scapularis (black-legged) ticks.Overwinter survival dropped to 33% when the snow melted. This has been substantiated by other researchers as well. Scott & Scott, 2018, ticks and climate change, JVSM
Firebrand Blaze Media superstar, Sara Gonzales has been outspoken about the dangers of routine childhood vaccination. She is young, tough, and has strong maternal instincts to protect her children. This is the perfect introduction for Wakefield’s Protocol 7.
Dr. Andrew Wakefield is a retired British gastroenterological surgeon who made the seminal observation that the combined measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine may be related to ileal-lymphoid nodular hyperplasia and autism in twelve initial cases. Wakefield’s 1998 Lancet paper was retracted 12 years later without violations of the COPE guidelines and his medical career was systematically dismantled by the British General Medical Council.
Dr. Wakefield since has moved to the United States and has become a prolific documentary and full feature film producer. He was interviewed by Sara Gonzales about his most recent film Protocol 7. (Go to top link for article and 22 minute interview)
The film is set to have a premiere screening in New York City at the Look Dine-in Cinema on May 31 before opening at The Laemmle Royal in Los Angeles on June 14 with a a week-long engagement. There will also be a mid-week GATHR powered theatrical “people’s premiere” on May 29, which is “a one day nation-wide event open to the public hosted by community ambassadors.” After that, showtimes in more United States and Canadian cities will follow.
Wakefield states the film script was written years ago but they sat on it waiting for the court case to be resolved. Over time documents were unsealed and he states the actual fraud was much, much worse than what is presented in the film. Due to this, he highly doubts Merck will come after him. Segments of the interview were unfortunately cut out for not complying with YouTube’s standards, which is blatant censorship.
About a week ago, the World Health Organization released a shocking projection. Specifically, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (which is a sub-agency of the WHO) they released a report which projected a 77 percent increase in the number of cancer cases (worldwide) by the year 2050.
In terms of why this is happening (why the global incidence of cancers is expected to go from 20 million per year to 35 million)—the WHO offered a few explanations:
“The rapidly growing global cancer burden reflects both population aging and growth, as well as changes to people’s exposure to risk factors, several of which are associated with socioeconomic development. Tobacco, alcohol and obesity are key factors behind the increasing incidence of cancer, with air pollution still a key driver of environmental risk factors.”
Although, notice that amidst the WHO explanation on what is causing this massive spike in cancers, there’s something not mentioned.
Something that billions of people took (or, were forced to take) over the past 3 years. And while at the moment, most online fact-checkers are dutifully saying that there is definitely no connection between the vaccines and cancers, well… the reality is that the vaccines have only been on the market for about 3 years now. And so, the long term of effects of them (the 5, 10, 15 year effects) are definitely unknown—despite what anyone might say.
However, fear not: because the CDC is now tracking those who are unvaccinated, in order to see what their health outcomes are compared to those who are vaccinated. Sort of like… a control group.
_________________
**UPDATE**
Within this video Japan’s most senior oncologist, Professor Fukushima, who is an author of the following paper condemns mRNA ‘vaccines’ as “evil practices of science.”
Therefore this vaccine was from the beginning based on misconception, misconduct, and evil practices of science, totally defective, founded on misconceptions, leading to a totally false production, a false product, I believe. ~ Prof. Fukushima
The study examines age-adjusted mortality rates (AMRs) for various types of cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic, specifically looking at changes following the administration of the third dose of mRNA-lipid Nanoparticle injections.
The authors reported a distinct temporal pattern in cancer mortality rates.
In 2020, there was no noticeable increase in cancer mortality, indicating that the initial phase of the pandemic did not significantly affect cancer death rates. However, following the rollout of the first and second doses of the COVID-19 vaccine in 2021, an increase in excess mortality for some cancer types was observed. This trend became more pronounced in 2022, after the administration of the third vaccine dose, where significant excess mortality was noted across all cancers, with particular increases in ovarian, leukemia, prostate, lip/oral/pharyngeal, pancreatic, and breast cancers. (See link for article)
Vaxxed Couples Begin ‘Dropping Dead’ from ‘Dual Turbo Cancer’
Hunter Fielding
Doctors have issued an emergency alert after seeing a sharp increase in Covid mRNA vaccinated couples dying simultaneously shortly after a “dual turbo cancer diagnosis.”
The couple were all vaccinated at the same time and were later diagnosed with deadly cancers together.
Many doctors are warning that while their patients seem relatively healthy when they are diagnosed with cancer, most are dead within a week.
They warn that the rapid onset of the turbo cancers means the suffers are virtually “dropping dead.” (See link for article & pictures of couples dead from cancer)
The author points out that approximately 70% of the world has received at least one dose of the COVID ‘vaccine.’ Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines can cause very aggressive cancers called “Turbo Cancer”.
Ethical Skeptic on X has put out new data today (April 4, 2024) showing that Cancer mortality in the United States has hit a new record high after being fairly flat over the past year. This is a very concerning development.
According to Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, 1 in 3 people will get cancer. He seems quite certain about this. (See link for article)
Turbo Cancer Deaths Surge in Vaxxed 15 to 44-Year-Olds
Frank Bergman
An alarming new study has revealed a dramatic surge in Covid mRNA vaccinated young people dying from turbo cancers.
According to a new study, official government data shows a shocking spike in turbo cancer deaths in young people aged 15- to 44 years old since 2021.
In the last three years, doctors have been reporting skyrocketing cases of deadly turbo cancers.
People who have been vaccinated with Covid mRNA injections have been suffering from a high incidence of these fast-developing cancers.
Some doctors are reporting that cancers are so rapidly developing that their patients are dying within a week of being diagnosed.
An analysis of U.K. government data shows an unprecedented increase in cancer deaths among 15- to 44-year-olds who were vaccinated with COVID-19 vaccines, according to a new report by data analyst Edward Dowd. (See link for article)
________________
With cancer rates soaring, the powers that be ‘TPTB,’ are predictably blaming anything but the ‘vaccine’ (#ABV) including ‘accelerated aging.’
Accelerated aging — when someone’s biological age is greater than their chronological age — could increase the risk of cancer tumors.
That’s according to new research presented this week at the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Annual Meeting in San Diego, California.
“Historically, both cancer and aging have been viewed primarily as concerns for older populations,” Ruiyi Tian, MPH, a graduate student at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis and one of the study researchers, told Fox News Digital. (See link for article)
_____________
**Comment**
A new peer-reviewed study has concluded that 1 in 4 who got the COVID gene therapy shot will die early. Nearly 30% of the total sample in the study found themselves in the hospital with some form of cardiac complication after getting the shots.
But true to form, ‘public health’ is sticking with the ‘nothing to see here’ mantra.
For anyone paying attention to the WHO Pandemic Treaty, it changes by the hour. With that in mind, the latest is the revelation is that it could all be a ruse to divert attention away from the real culprit: government officials right here in the U.S. who plan to abuse our rights during any proclaimed ‘pandemic.’
The Pandemic Treaty of today is much, much different than the one proposed over a year ago. This appears to be intentional in that the earlier versions may have been the red herring to throw everyone off from focusing their efforts where it matters most. Go here for reasons why the WHO should be abolishednot reformed.
Several articles on the proposed amendments to the WHO’s international health regulations have appeared here on Brownstone, such as this excellent introduction. Consequently, there is no need to repeat this information in a similar format. What I would like to do instead is to pursue the question, what the implications would be for people worldwide if this organisation were to be successful in getting the representatives of member countries to accept the proposed amendments. More specifically, what are the likely consequences in terms of the concept and practice of totalitarianism?
To understand this, one has to get to grips with the mode of rule called totalitarian government, of course, but I doubt whether most people have an adequate grasp of full-fledged totalitarian rule, despite recently experiencing it to a certain degree under ‘pandemic’ conditions. Should the amendments proposed by the WHO be accepted in May, the citizens of the world would be subjected to unadulterated totalitarianism, however, so it is worthwhile exploring the full implications of this ‘anonymous’ mode of governance here.
This is done in the hope that, if representatives of the people – which is what they are supposed to be – in legislative bodies around the world were to read this article, as well as others related to the same topic, they would think twice before supporting a motion or bill which would, in effect, grant the WHO the right to usurp the sovereignty of member nations. The recent developments in the state of Louisiana in the US, which amount to the rejection of the WHO’s authority, should be an inspiration to other states and countries to follow its example. This is the way to beat the WHO’s mendacious ‘pandemic treaty.’
On her website, called Freedom Research, Dr Meryl Nass has described the WHO’s notion of ‘pandemic preparedness’ as a ‘scam/boondoggle/Trojan horse,’ which aims (among other things) to transfer billions of taxpayer dollars to the WHO as well as other industries, in order to vindicate censorship in the name of ‘public health,’ and perhaps most importantly, to transfer sovereignty regarding decision-making for ‘public health’ globally to the Director-General of the WHO (which means that legally, member countries would lose their sovereignty).
In addition, she highlights the fact that the WHO intends to use the idea of ‘One Health’ to subsume all living beings, ecosystems, as well as climate change under its own ‘authority;’ further, to acquire more pathogens for wide distribution, in this way exacerbating the possibility of pandemics while obscuring their origin, and in the event of such pandemics occurring, justifying the development of more (mandatory) ‘vaccines’ and the mandating of vaccine passports (and of lockdowns) globally, thus increasing control (the key term here) over populations. Should its attempt at a global power grab succeed, the WHO would have the authority to impose any ‘medical’ programme it deems necessary for ‘world health,’ regardless of their efficacy and side-effects (including death).
In the preceding paragraph I italicised the word ‘control’ as a key term. What should be added to it is the term ‘total’ – that is, ‘total control.’ This is the gist of totalitarian rule, and it should therefore be easy to see that what the WHO (together with the WEF and the UN) strives for is total or complete control of all people’s lives. (See link for article)
Important excerpt:
In a nutshell, it means that this unelected organisation would have the authority to proclaim lockdowns and ‘medical (or health) emergencies,’ as well as mandatory ‘vaccinations’ at the whim of the WHO’s Director-General, reducing the freedom to traverse space freely to ironclad spatial confinement in one fell swoop. This is what ‘total terror’ would mean.It is my fervent hope that something can still be done to avert this imminent nightmare.
Top WHO Official Testifies: Vaccine Passports Were a Scam to Push Fake Covid Shots
Frank Bergman
Article Excerpts:
A top official with the World Health Organization (WHO) has admitted during an explosive testimony that the vaccine passports pushed by the agency were just a scam to advance the global vaccination agenda.
Additionally, Dr. Hanna Nohynek testified that the WHO knew that Covid mRNA shots were ineffective but still pushed for the general public to be pressured into taking the experimental injections.
Nohynek is the WHO’s chair of the Strategic Group of Experts on Immunization and serves as the chief physician at the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare.
Nohynek testified in court that she advised the WHO and her government that vaccine passports were not needed.
As Slay News has previously reported, the EU has collaborated with the World Economic Forum (WEF) to modify the system to run as a “digital ID” instead.
These policies sought only to vaccinate as many members of the general public as possible, regardless of the risks.
Malhotra notes that this mass vaccination agenda undermined informed patient consent and evidence-based medical practice. (See link for article)
It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see what could happen if Section 702 is allowed to continue. Journalists, scientists, doctors, and anyone who speaks against the government narrative can be spied on. We all saw this happen during COVID when government worked with social media companies to censor those who disagreed with ‘public health’ dictates and paid media and to promote an experimental gene therapy. Often, these censoring media companies have direct investments with Big Pharma.
Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act was enacted to make it easier for the government to address foreign terrorist threats. Targeting Americans is prohibited but intelligence agencies have used Section 702 to spy on hundreds of thousands of Americans every year. And this week it’s looking to get a lot worse.
Buried in the Section 702 re-authorization bill passed by the House on Friday is the biggest expansion of domestic surveillance since the Patriot Act.
Under current law, the government can compel “electronic communications service providers” that have direct access to communications to assist the NSA in conducting Section 702 surveillance. Companies like Verizon and Google must turn over the communications of targets, which officially must be foreigners overseas, but this has been abused to spy on Americans.
By changing the definition of “electronic communications surveillance provider,” an amendment offered by House intel committee leaders and passed by the House vastly expands the universe of entities that can be compelled to assist the NSA.
If the bill becomes law, any company or individual that provides any service whatsoever may be forced to assist in NSA surveillance, as long as they have access to equipment on which communications are transmitted or stored. (See link for article)
______________
SUMMARY:
hotels, libraries and coffee stops were excluded but the vast majority of businesses remain fair game such as barbershops, laundromats, fitness centers, hardware stores, commercial landlords that rent office space, and any small business that offers wifi to customers via routers
service providers who come into our homes such as house cleaners, plumbers, and IT service providers could also be forced to serve as surrogate spies, required to give the NSA direct access
all of these potential rats would be under gag order and would face penalties if they told anyone
the NSA would be on the ‘honor system’ to retain only communications of approved foreign targets, however, they have repeatedly broken this trust.
the Senate is scheduled to vote on the bill this week.
Section 702 expires on April 19, the the Biden admin. obtained a FISA Court approval to continue this surveillance until April of 2025.
Call your Senators and tell them to block this invasive bill.
Rep. Massie states in order to get people to agree with this extreme government overreach is to give them frightening hypotheticals. Regarding the fear of search warrants delays, Massie states something called ‘exigent circumstances’ already exists where a search warrant can be bypassed due to an imminent threat.
Madison Area Lyme Support Group 