Author Archive

More Government Corruption: Litigation Reveals NO Reason To Recommend 6 COVID Boosters

https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/article/biden-admin-admits-no-evidence-behind-6-covid-booster-shots-a-year-recommendation

Biden Admin Concedes No Evidence Behind Recommendation for 6 COVID Booster Shots a Year

August 7, 2023

President Joe Biden’s administration concedes that there is no scientific evidence to support an apparent recommendation to receive as many as six COVID-19 booster shots in a year.

After Health Secretary Xavier Becerra, a Biden appointee, wrote in a social media post on Nov. 29, 2022, that people should get vaccinated “if it’s been over 2 months since your last dose,” the Functional Government Initiative (FGI) filed a Freedom of Information Act request for documents supporting the statements.

The watchdog organization then sued after the administration didn’t comply with timelines laid out in the law.  (See link for article)

_______________

SUMMARY:

  • Despite 1,263 pages being reviewed, not a SINGLE record supported Becerra’s irresponsible booster recommendation.
  • Becerra, a lawyer by trade, lacks a background in health yet is the secretary of HHS, a position normally held by a doctor.
  • Biden himself is guilty of misinformation by stating “if you are vaccinated you are not going to be hospitalized, or go to the ICU, or die.”  Unfortunately, the ‘vaccinated’ have done all three. On a similar point, Dr. Wenstrup (R-Ohio) gives Walensky far too much credit as she too has been guilty of ‘misinformation’ over and over again, of distorting research, and of coining the phrase, “pandemic of the unvaccinated” when in fact it was just the opposite.  It’s also important to note that the shots caused disease enhancement.
  • Virtually nothing we were told was true, but has been described as “stupid,” certainly looked stupid, and has caused bad news all around.
  • Despite any evidence whatsoever, Vice President Kamala Harris is also on record claiming that a single shot would protect people from COVID-19 for an entire year. 
  • Despite the devastation and ineffectiveness of the shots and in a seemingly parallel world, CDC’s new director, Dr. Mandy Cohen, said the agency is poised to recommend annual COVID shots similarly to the flu.
The government is all about clamping down on ‘misinformation,’  but it should pull the log out of its own eye.

Never forget this:

 

Or the inhumane treatment of the unvaccinated.

For more:

FDA Admits Guidance on Ivermectin Was Illegal But Invokes ‘Sovereign Immunity’

This lawsuit was filed over a year ago but FDA attorney Ashley Cheung Honold is now on record stating two cringe-worthy things that medical freedom hinges upon:

  1. The FDA never prohibited the “off-label” use of ivermectin for COVID.
  2. The FDA is held accountable by the political process,’ therefore, ‘it’s not the role of the courts to fact-check the FDA’s scientific statements.’
Houston, we have numerous problems.

This reminds me of the recent Australian Senate hearings where COVID injection manufacturers insist that people were not forced to take the experimental gene therapy injections developed by the U.S. Military as “prototypes” and “counter-measures,” which are made up of more than 99% graphene, and that are linked to more adverse reactions and death than any other vaccine in the history of VAERS.

I guess it all depends upon your definition of “forced” and “mandated.”
Medical freedom was completely abandoned during COVID and should concern Lyme/MSIDS patients greatly.

In March, Dr. Pierre Kory delivered some powerful blows in a Federalist article about how dangerous it is to allow a single government agency so much power, giving it virtually the ability to control all of medicine without oversight.  Professional medical groups are completely guilty of this corruption of power as well and need to be put in check as they have come after Lyme/MSIDS doctors for decades creating an environment where doctors are too afraid to treat patients.  Doctors also feared and were coerced into complacency during COVID as well except the following who were severely persecuted for speaking out:

http://

FDA in Court For Ivermectin Statements

Aug. 11, 2023

In this court case FDA says and I quote,

“FDA was not regulating the off-label use of drugs. These statements are not regulations they have no legal consequences they don’t prohibit doctors from prescribing Ivermectin to treat COVID or for any other purpose. Quite to the contrary there are three instances I’d like to point the court to in the record that show that FDA explicitly recognizes that doctors do have the authority to prescribe ivermectin to treat COVID.”

https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/bombshell-fda-admits-guidance-on?

BOMBSHELL: FDA Admits Guidance on Ivermectin was Illegal, Invokes ‘Sovereign Immunity’ for Misleading Statements (& Crimes Against Humanity)

This Substack has chronicled the illegal war on PSYOP-19 early treatment therapies by the very perpetrators of the “pandemic,” and their associated criminal mandates. It is no surprise that the most vilified early treatment repurposed drug Ivermectin has also been by far the most effective:

PetMectin: Pharmaceutical Grade Pure Ivermectin

PetMectin: Pharmaceutical Grade Pure Ivermectin

Ivermectin is perhaps the single best treatment not just for PSYOP-19, but for the spike protein damage that is induced by the slow kill bioweapon injections. Since the rollout of the “pandemic,” ivermectin was savaged by the quisling MSM, the various illegitimate Federal government agencies and their CDC, WHO, UN, WEF, Rockefeller and Gates “nonprofit”…

The reason that the captured FDA along with their partners-in-crime the CDC, WHO, UN, WEF, CFR, DoD, Pentagon, CIA, the illegitimate Federal government, Rockefeller and Gates “nonprofits,” et al. have targeted Ivermectin is threefold: it is exceptionally effective as an early C-19 treatment, mass administration would have resulted in plummeting global (turbo) cancer rates, and this wonder drug attenuates and reverses the slow kill bioweapon DEATHVAX™ damage.

A landmark lawsuit filed against the FDA by doctors Mary Talley Bowden, Paul Marik, and Robert Apter was heard in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals yesterday. Part of this lawsuit against the FDA was specific to fraudulent and illicit claims made by the agency against Ivermectin.  (See link for article)

__________________

SUMMARY:

  • The lawyer insists the FDA did not prevent doctors from prescribing ivermectin off-label and is invoking “Sovereign Immunity.”
  • The lawyer says that even if FDA statements were misleading, the agency is not responsible for doctors losing their jobs.
  • In the most disturbing admission, he states the FDA is ‘held accountable by the political process,’ so it’s not the role of the courts to fact-check the FDA’s scientific statements.
  • This lawsuit implicates and exposes the FDA for actual crimes which mainstream media won’t touch with a 10-foot pole.
  • This tells you everything you need to know:

  • Not only is ivermectin effective against COVID, worms, and other viruses, it is highly effective at preventing and treating cancer.  No wonder it had to be eliminated.
  • Since ivermectin and fenbendazole are off-patent and they are now generic, cheap drugs, you will be hard-pressed to find much info about them.  There’s just no money to be made, and therefore no incentive to educate the public about them.
  • This website has posted information on two of the three doctors that filed this lawsuit.  Dr. Paul Marik has been an outspoken advocate for the use of ivermectin and has saved lives with it.  Dr. Bowden normally an ENT, out of necessity, has become the emergency room, a primary care physician (PCP), and has kept thousands out of the hospital with early treatment. She speaks at 6:30 in this video, “COVID -19 a Second Opinion,” which is highly recommended viewing to educate yourself on the shenanigans played in hospitals to keep people from appropriate treatment.

Living Well When You Don’t Feel Well: Overcoming Lyme Disease & Illness

http://  Approx. 18 Min

Living Well When You Don’t Feel Well

Overcoming Lyme Disease & Illness

Joe Trunzo PhD Professor of Psychology

Dr. Trunzo highlights a different way of thinking and coping with diseases (and life), specifically Lyme disease. 

He earned his undergraduate degree in 1993 from Marywood University in Scranton PA and completed his graduate work in 2000 at Drexel University in Philadelphia, PA. He completed his pre-doctoral internship at the University of Vermont and his post-doctoral fellowship at the Centers for Behavioral & Preventive Medicine at Brown University Medical School in Providence, RI. He is a Professor of Psychology and Chair of the Department of Applied Psychology at Bryant University. He is also a licensed, practicing clinical psychologist with expertise in the psychological management of chronic medical illnesses such as cancer and Lyme disease, as well as the treatment of mood and anxiety disorders, especially obsessive compulsive disorder. He serves on several professional committees and belongs to a number of professional organizations. In his spare time, he enjoys being with his family, live music, running, and mountain climbing.

This talk was given at a TEDx event using the TED conference format but independently organized by a local community. Learn more at https://www.ted.com/tedx

_______________

**Comment**

A very sane and logical talk on the Lyme/MSIDS controversy involving three camps of thought, which then moves on into how to develop a mindset that focuses on living the best life you can while sick.  Dr. Trunzo utilizes the mindfulness based, values-oriented behavioral therapy called ACT (Acceptance & Commitment Therapy) to help patients.

He states that by not accepting what patients are feeling and going through, they can trap themselves and create more problems.  I must throw in a personal note here: one of the most helpful things I was ever told early on by another patient who reached the other side was:

“Don’t be depressed about feeling depressed.”

This may be laughingly simple; however, I found that I needed to give myself permission to feel depressed.  Knowing, understanding and accepting the fact I was going to feel miserable and have some really rotten days (or months!) helped me tremendously.  Being chronically/persistently infected with multiple pathogens that work symbiotically and that are in your brain and virtually every organ of your body wreaking havoc, not only affects you physically but emotionally and spiritually.  Add in the fact that mainstream medicine denies this fact entirely and that your friends and family may choose to believe you are a hypochondriac rather than an extremely ill person who needs help, because after-all you “look fine” – and you can become very depressed and isolated indeed, which doesn’t help the healing process at all!

Obviously, the goal here is not to remain sick, but to achieve wellness and health; however, with Lyme/MSIDS that may take years to accomplish, and even then there is a very real potential that facets of your health may never return to the way they were before you became infected.  As with all things in Lymeland, everyone’s journey is unique to them and no two cases look alike.

For more:

First Case Report of Pancreatitis in Lyme Disease

https://researchopenworld.com/first-case-report-of-pancreatitis-in-lyme-disease/

First Case Report of Pancreatitis in Lyme Disease

Publication history

Received: November 14, 2019
Accepted: November 21, 2019
Published: November 25, 2019

Citation

A Baisse, S Parreau, A Abdeh, N Pichon (2019) First Case Report of Pancreatitis in Lyme disease. Internal Med Res Open J Volume 4 (2): 1–2. DOI: 10.31038/IMROJ.2019423

Short Abstract

We report a case of Lyme disease, revealed by pancreatic damage in a 49-year-old man without any medical history. The Lyme disease was revealed by repeated abdominal pain for 4 weeks, a skin lesion of quadricipital region, biological and radiological results showing pancreatic abnormalities.

Case Report

A 49-year-old man, non-alcoholic forest worker, with no past medical history, consulted to the Emergency Department for fever and persistent abdominal pain for a week. The biological results including, C – reactive protein (CRP), lipase, hepatic assessment were normal as well as contrast-enhanced abdominal Computed Tomography (CT). On the day after, the evolution was favorable under symptomatic treatment including nefopam and paracetamol and the patient was discharged from the hospital. One week later, the patient was admitted to the Emergency Department with an identical symptomatology. A posterior quadricipital peeling skin lesion, appeared two weeks earlier according to the patient, was observed (Figure 1a.) A gastroscopy, a colonoscopy, other abdominal CT and biological tests were performed. An inflammation biomarker elevation was observed (CRP: 180 mg/L and hyperleukocytosis: 13.3 G/L) without other biological abnormalities (lipase: 48 UI/L, ALAT: 48 UI/L). The endoscopic examinations and abdominal CT were normal. The patient was discharged from the hospital without any treatment. Half a month later, the patient was admitted to the Emergency Department for the third time and recurrence of the abdominal pain. The clinical examination found a hemodynamic stability, an abdominal pain of the left hypochondrium associated with a cutaneous ulcerative and non-progressive skin lesion in the same region as previously mentioned (Figure 1b.). The biological assessment found a very mild inflammatory syndrome (CRP 86 mg/L, Procalcitonin < 0.2 ng/mL, leukocytes 9.5 G/L), a high lipase level at 1714 IU/L without hepatocellular abnormalities. The third abdominal CT revealed an aspect of pancreatic necrosis with a pseudocyst (6 cm) at the tail of the pancreas, in contact with the splenic hile and the posterior wall of the stomach (Figure 1c.). The patient was hospitalized in Intensive Care Department with the diagnosis of pancreatitis.

On admission, the work-ups looking for the usual causes of pancreatitis (alcohol, gallstones, medications induced, hypercalcemia, traumatic, chemical exposures, hereditary diseases, infections) were negative. Regarding the skin patient’s lesion and anamnesis, the diagnosis of Lyme disease was evoked. His Lyme serology was strongly IgM positive and confirmed by Western Blot. He was treated with ceftriaxone associated with effective analgesic therapy. The clinical and biological course was uneventful and the patient was discharged from the hospital after 3 weeks. The relationship between Lyme disease and acute pancreatitis was strongly suspected.

Discussion

Lyme disease is an endemic zoonosis, transmitted to humans by a tick bite causing a multisystemic impairment due to a Gram-negative bacillus, Borrellia burgdorferi [1]. The disease schematically includes two phases and a polymorphism in clinical manifestations: a primary phase with chronical migrans erythema and articular signs (80% of cases), a secondary phase of heterogeneous and lymphatic dissemination, inaugurated by flu-like symptoms and associating neurological, cardiac or articular signs that could become chronic [2]. Each of these attacks could be inaugural or/and isolated [3]. Concerning the anamnesis, only 30% of patients remember a tick bite [4].

The heterogeneity of presentation in Lyme disease includes the serodiagnosis as a central investigation for confirmation [5]. Hepatic impairment due to Lyme disease, including hepatitis and hepatomegaly, is inconsistent, commonly found in early stage but often asymptomatic and with plasmatic manifestations [6]. A moderate hypertransaminasemia (2 to 3 N) could be noted, predominating on the ALAT. This hepatic biologic involvement is present in 27 to 66% of cases [7]. This can be explained by a systemic, lymphatic migration of the incriminated bacteria and a secondary hepatic sequestration [8]. To our knowledge, this physiopathological evolution to explain liver disorders has never been described for pancreas but is probably similar.

Regarding the treatment of Lyme disease, the cycline are recommended for the uncomplicated forms. An antibiotic treatment with cephalosporins could be considered for cardiac, neurological or complicated cases [2]. The evolution is favorable in 85% of patients, including hepatic acute injuries [9].

In our case, the skin lesion associated with a supposed tick bite, the anamnesis, the absence of other cause of pancreatitis, the favorable evolution under antibiotic treatment and especially the strong positivity of the serology are in favor of a Borrelia burgdoferi infection.

Conclusion

The authors report the first case of pancreatitis revealing a Lyme disease. Clinical, biological and evolutionary findings support the responsibility of Lyme disease in the pathogenesis of our pancreatitis case.  (See link for article and pictures)

_________________

**Comment**

How many patients have had this or similar issues but didn’t have the rash, had negative serology and didn’t fit the other arbitrary standards that mainstream medicine has imposed that thousands of other patients don’t fit?  God only knows.

Pandemic Preparedness & The Road to International Fascism

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajes.12531?

Pandemic preparedness and the road to international fascism

First published: 30 July 2023

Abstract

The World Health Organization’s broad definition of health embraces physical, mental and social well-being. Expressed in its 1946 constitution alongside concepts of community participation and national sovereignty, it reflected an understanding of a world emerging from centuries of colonialist oppression and the public health industry’s shameful facilitation of fascism. Health policy would be people-centered, closely tied to human rights and self-determination. The COVID-19 response has demonstrated how these ideals have been undone. Decades of increasing funding within public-private partnerships have corroded the basis of global public health. The COVID-19 response, intended for a virus that overwhelmingly targeted the elderly, ignored norms of epidemic management and human rights to institute a regime of suppression, censorship, and coercion reminiscent of the power systems and governance that were previously condemned. Without pausing to examine the costs, the public health industry is developing international instruments and processes that will entrench these destructive practices in international law. Public health, presented as a series of health emergencies, is being used once again to facilitate a fascist approach to societal management. The beneficiaries will be the corporations and investors whom the COVID-19 response served well. Human rights and individual freedom, as under previous fascist regimes, will lose. The public health industry must urgently awaken to the changing world in which it works, if it is to adopt a role in saving public health rather than contributing to its degradation.

For more: