Author Archive

Redfield Breaks Silence on Long COVID, Cancer, ‘Vaccines,’ and Chronic Lyme

https://www.change.org/p/the-us-senate-calling-for-a-congressional-investigation-of-the-cdc-idsa-and-aldf/u/34045161?

Dr. Redfield Breaks His Silence — Long COVID, Cancer & Vaccines [And Chronic Lyme]

Carl Tuttle
Hudson, NH, United States
Nov 8, 2025

So it looks like Redfield is now a Scientific Advisor for TechImmune, LLC.

That vaccine money grab through patent royalties or advisory roles is just too lucrative to pass up.

From the TechImmune website: https://techimmune.com/

“TechImmune, LLC has been awarded a business (SBIR) grant from the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIH) to develop a Universal Vaccine Against Multiple Coronavirus Variants of Concern.  Additional grants are pending.”
 
Scientific Advisor
Dr. Redfield is the former Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and a distinguished public health leader with decades of experience in medicine and research. He played a key role as a contributor to Operation Warp Speed, helping accelerate the development of life-saving vaccines  [Huh???] during the COVID-19 pandemic. Today, he continues to advance the field through his active involvement in Long COVID clinical research.

Please see my email to Dr Redfield following his interview from the Dana Parish Podcast.

(Picture of Redfield was found here)

———- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: “rrredfieldmd@gmail.com” <rrredfieldmd@gmail.com>
Cc: dana@danaparish.com, sephillips18@gmail.com, skottilil@ihv.umaryland.edu
Date: 11/06/2025 10:39 AM EST
Subject: The Dana Parish Podcast; Dr. Redfield Breaks His Silence — Long COVID, Cancer & Vaccines [And Chronic Lyme]

The Dana Parish Podcast

Dr. Redfield Breaks His Silence — Long COVID, Cancer & Vaccines [And Chronic Lyme]
http://

Excerpt: 

Dana Parish: “Why are we still suffering like this… it is known at the upper echelons of Public Health that Lyme is chronic.”

Dr. Redfield: “Cause people can’t get a simple diagnostic test to prove it.”

Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland
725 West Lombard St, Room N560
Baltimore, MD 21201

Dr. Redfield,

You are mistaken. The real reason why “we are still suffering” is outlined in the correspondence below addressed to Adrian Duncan, Group Vice President of WebMD referencing their latest CME offering for Lyme disease. Google’s Gemini AI describes it as: intent to deceive for financial gain.

Carl Tuttle
Independent Researcher
Hudson, NH USA

Cc: Shyamasundaran Kottilil, MBBS, PhD
Institute of Human Virology, Director, Clinical Care & Research; Chief, Infectious Diseases; Professor of Medicine

Email sent to Adrian Duncan, Group Vice President WebMD:

#1 ——— Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: aduncan@webmd.net
Cc: cme@medscape.net, caitlin@medlitera.com, naseem@medlitera.com, michelle@medlitera.com
Date: 10/24/2025 12:42 PM EDT
Subject: Medscape Now! Understanding the Latest Evidence and Best Practices for Interprofessional Care of Post-Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome

Medscape Now! Understanding the Latest Evidence and Best Practices for Interprofessional Care of Post-Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome
https://www.medscape.org/viewarticle/medscape-now-understanding-latest-evidence-and-best-2025a1000rrr
CME Author: Naseem Bazargan, MPH     Developed with AI assistance.

Excerpt:

State of the Evidence

“To date, our understanding of the pathophysiology of Lyme IACI remains limited,[4] with little to no evidence supporting chronic Borrelia infection as the underlying cause.”

Adrian Duncan, Group Vice President
Global Head of Education & Medical Affairs

Dear Mr. Duncan,

In reference to the Medscape article written by Naseem Bazargan, I asked Google’s Gemini AI the following questions:

The latest Medscape CME education claiming to be developed with AI assistance, appears to have omitted the following references:

2018 Middelveen study; “Persistent Borrelia Infection in Patients with Ongoing Symptoms of Lyme Disease” identifying twelve patients who were culture positive after antibiotic treatment. Some of these patients had taken as many as eleven different types of antibiotics. Also missing is the NIH funded Embers studies of persistent Bb infection in monkeys and mice. And the Sapi study: “The Long-Term Persistence of Borrelia burgdorferi Antigens and DNA in the Tissues of a Patient with Lyme Disease”  Here is the positive culture report from the CDC at Fort Collins Colorado and the chronic Lyme autopsy results from the patient in the Sapi study: Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. The destructive nature of Borrelia is evident in the patient’s liver (nutmeg liver), kidneys, heart, lungs and brain. The patient died after the insurer refused additional IV antibiotic therapy.

Additional reference from 1990: “Chronic neurologic manifestations of Lyme disease” Dr. Allen Steere

In fact, there appears to be 700 references identifying persistent infection. 
 
Question: So, is AI participating in the collusion to suppress evidence of antibiotic resistance or chronic Lyme disease? And what about the other 700 references identifying persistent infection?

Mr. Duncan…  I will spare you the lengthy discourse and get right to the point.

Questions to AI:

1. Does a chronic relapsing seronegative disease fit the vaccine model?

AI Response:

A chronic, relapsing, seronegative disease does not fit the traditional vaccine model, which is primarily designed to prevent initial infections. The characteristics you describe present significant scientific and commercial challenges for vaccine developers.

2. Since you agreed that a chronic, relapsing, seronegative disease does not fit the traditional vaccine model this in and of itself would be the motivation to conceal any and all evidence of persistent infection wouldn’t you agree? This so-called debate is not a debate at all and deserves a criminal investigation. Who would be a suitable candidate to approach for a legal case?

AI Response: Allegations of medical fraud are typically handled as civil matters, but they can become criminal if there is evidence of gross negligence, recklessness, or intent to deceive, especially for financial gain.

Mr. Duncan,

Thirty-four years ago Dr. Allen Steere identified chronic Lyme disease which should have set off a red flag prompting an immediate search for better antimicrobials but then did a 180° as he became principal investigator (PI) of the Phase 3 clinical trial for the first Lyme disease vaccine. So all the eggs were put into the vaccine basket while a campaign was orchestrated to discredit the sick and disabled patient population along with the courageous clinicians attempting to help these patients. Apparently, a chronic relapsing seronegative disease did not fit the business model of patent royalties, vaccine development and pharmaceutical profits. This set the stage for long-term treatment denial and unimaginable pain and suffering around the world. It has been ongoing for over three decades now and the latest CME from Medscape is propagating this travesty.

Lyme disease has been grossly mishandled by our public health officials for the sake of a vaccine. A false public health narrative was enforced and any clinician who did not follow that narrative risked losing their license to practice medicine as seen in the documentary: Under our Skin. (please watch the 5min trailer)

I want to make this crystal clear; suppressing evidence of antibiotic resistance is not collaboration, it is collusion. Will you turn a blind eye to the facts/evidence I have presented?

A response to this inquiry is requested.
Respectfully submitted,

Carl Tuttle
Independent Researcher
Hudson, NH USA

Additional references:
 
Evidence Of Persistence Of Lyme Disease In Humans
https://www.lymedisease.org/lyme-basics/resources/evidence-of-persistence-lyme-disease-in-humans/

[View chart here]

#2 ———- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>To: aduncan@webmd.netCc: cme@medscape.net, caitlin@medlitera.com, naseem@medlitera.com, michelle@medlitera.comDate: 10/28/2025 9:28 AM EDT
Subject: Re: Medscape Now! Understanding the Latest Evidence and Best Practices for Interprofessional Care of Post-Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome

Dear Mr. Duncan,

In 2016 Dr. Paul Auwaerter, past president of the Infectious Diseases Society of America coauthored a study revealing the persister form of Borrelia burgdorferi resistant to antibiotics.

Here is a timeline of events:

2015

Standard antibiotic treatment for Lyme disease does not kill persistent Borrelia bacteria.
http://droopyyoupi.blogspot.com/2015/08/standart-antibiotic-treatment-for-lyme.html

Excerpt:

-What has tuberculosis and Borrelia burgdorferi in common? In the late stage of the disease occurs persistent (tolerant) bacteria, which essentially means that the bacteria lasts and lasts and lasts. They protect themselves against antibiotics and are difficult to treat.

– Both Borrelia burgdorferi and tuberculosis is relatively easy to cure in the early stages, even with the use of one antibiotic. In the late stage it is impossible to cure the disease with the same type of treatment in the acute phase, said Dr. Ying Zhang when he visited the year NorVect conference.

-Dr. Ying Zhang is a professor at the Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
-Two days after NorVect conference, published Dr. Ying Zhang’s latest research Identification of new compounds with high activity against stationary phase Borrelia burgdorferi from the NCI compound collection.

2016

A Drug Combination Screen Identifies Drugs Active against Amoxicillin-Induced Round Bodies of In Vitro Borrelia burgdorferi Persisters from an FDA Drug Library Jie Feng 1, Wanliang Shi 1, Shuo Zhang 1, David Sullivan 1, Paul G Auwaerter 2, Ying Zhang 1
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27242757/

Abstract

Under experimental stress conditions such as starvation or antibiotic exposure, Borrelia burgdorferi can develop round body forms, which are a type of persister bacteria that appear resistant in vitro to customary first-line antibiotics for Lyme disease. To identify more effective drugs with activity against the round body form of B. burgdorferi, we established a round body persister model induced by exposure to amoxicillin (50 μg/ml) and then screened the Food and Drug Administration drug library consisting of 1581 drug compounds and also 22 drug combinations using the SYBR Green I/propidium iodide viability assay. We identified 23 drug candidates that have higher activity against the round bodies of B. burgdorferi than either amoxicillin or doxycycline.

2022

Nitroxoline Drug Combinations Are More Active Than Lyme Antibiotic Combination and Can Eradicate Stationary-Phase Borrelia burgdorferi
Alvarez-Manzo, Hector S.1; Zhang, Yumin1; Zhang, Ying2,✉
https://journals.lww.com/imd/fulltext/2022/09000/nitroxoline_drug_combinations_are_more_active_than.7.aspx

Abstract

Lyme disease (LD), caused by Borrelia burgdorferi, is the most common vector-borne disease in the United States and Europe. Despite the standard 2–4 weeks’ antibiotic treatment, approximately 10%–20% of patients will develop posttreatment LD syndrome, a condition that is poorly understood. One of the probable causes is thought to be the presence of B. burgdorferi persister forms that are not effectively killed by the current LD antibiotics. In this study, we evaluated nitroxoline, an antibiotic used to treat urinary tract infections, for its activity against a stationary-phase culture enriched with persister forms of B. burgdorferi. Nitroxoline was found to be more active than doxycycline and equally active as cefuroxime (standard LD antibiotics) against B. burgdorferi. Importantly, the nitroxoline two-drug combinations nitroxoline + cefuroxime and nitroxoline + clarithromycin, as well as the nitroxoline three-drug combination nitroxoline + cefuroxime + clarithromycin, were as effective as the persister drug daptomycin-based positive control three-drug combination cefuroxime + doxycycline + daptomycin, completely eradicating stationary-phase B. burgdorferi in the drug-exposure experiments and preventing regrowth in the subculture study. Future studies should evaluate these promising drug combinations in a persistent LD mouse model.

Dr. Redfield… This is the missing research that should have been conducted early in the discovery phase of the disease but as we now know, all the eggs were put into the vaccine basket while a campaign was orchestrated to discredit the sick and disabled patient population along with the courageous clinicians attempting to help these patients. What has been deceitfully established here in the US is wreaking havoc globally. Example: Lyme disease: Australians ‘being treated worse than a dog riddled with mange’, Senator John Madigan says
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-01-11/lyme-disease-treatment-in-australia-criticised-by-john-madigan/7080708

This research is being suppressed as the disabled Lyme patient population around the globe remain sick indefinitely. (Three decades and counting)

Guideline signatory Dr. Raymond Dattwyler owns 24 patents for Lyme disease that include diagnostic testing and vaccines both live bacteria and oral and endorses the categorical assertion that chronic Lyme disease does not exist yet his patent for novel chimeric nucleic acids and protein antigens which could serve as a basis for a vaccine or for improved immunodiagnostic reagents for Lyme disease, issuing almost contemporaneously with the 2006 IDSA Lyme Disease Guidelines seems to say exactly the opposite:

“Currently, Lyme Disease is treated with a range of antibiotics, e.g. tetracycline, penicillin and cephalosporins. However, such treatment is not always successful in clearing the infection. Treatment is often delayed due to improper diagnosis with the deleterious effect that the infection proceeds to a chronic condition, where treatment with antibiotics is often not useful. One of the factors contributing to delayed treatment is the lack of effective diagnostic tools.” (Dattwyler, et.al. United States Patent 7,179,448)

Please take a moment if you will to review the following inquiry addressed to doctor Dattwyler who has set the stage for long-term treatment denial. It should be noted that there was no response.

———- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: Raymond_Dattwyler@nymc.edu
Cc: npjvaccines@nature.com, abarrett@utmb.edu, R.W.Titball@exeter.ac.uk, mgomesso@uthsc.eduDate: 01/06/2023 2:46 PM EST
Subject: The year that shaped the outcome of the OspA vaccine for human Lyme disease

npj Vaccines Jan 2022 

The year that shaped the outcome of the OspA vaccine for human Lyme disease
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41541-022-00429-5 Raymond J. Dattwyler & Maria Gomes-Solecki

Department of Microbiology and Immunology
New York Medical College
Valhalla, NY
Raymond J. Dattwyler, Corresponding Author

Dear Dr. Dattwyler,

I read your manuscript with great interest as you call attention to a treatment-resistant Lyme arthritis with “no evidence of DNA” found in the joints of patients after antibiotic treatment.

For some strange reason however, I could not find the following 1995 publication within your paper identifying treatment-resistant neuroborreliosis:

European Neurology 1995

Seronegative Chronic Relapsing Neuroborreliosis
https://www.karger.com/Article/Abstract/117104
Lawrence C., Lipton R.B., Lowy F.D., Coyle P.K.d
 
Abstract

We report an unusual patient with evidence of Borrelia burgdorferi infection who experienced repeated neurologic relapses despite aggressive antibiotic therapy. Each course of therapy was associated with a Jarisch-Herxheimer-like reaction. Although the patient never had detectable free antibodies to B. burgdorferi in serum or spinal fluid, the CSF was positive on multiple occasions for complexed anti-B. burgdorferi antibodies, B. burgdorferi nucleic acids and free antigen.

In fact, Dr. Dattwyler there seems to be a great deal of “treatment-resistant” evidence published in multiple journals over the past three decades:

Peer Reviewed Evidence of Persistence of Lyme Disease Spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi and Tick-Borne Diseases (700 References)
https://www.dropbox.com/s/n09sk90eo6xz7ua/700%20articles%20LYME%20EvidenceofPersistence-V2.pdf?dl=0

So that brings me to the reason for this email…

Question:

Does a chronic relapsing seronegative disease fit the vaccine model? If not, would that, in and of itself, be the hidden reason for denying chronic (treatment-resistant) Lyme disease for almost three decades?  In other words, patent royalties and pharmaceutical profits over lifesaving care?

A response to this inquiry is requested.
Carl Tuttle
Hudson, NH

Cc: Alan D.T. Barrett, PhD Editor-in-Chief
Rick Titball, PhD, DSc, Deputy Editor

 
Letter to the Editor of the BMJ published June 2020
https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1041/rr-1

Dr. Redfield… We have been dealing with an antibiotic resistant/tolerant super-bug. Post Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome (PTLDS) is simply a fabricated medical condition disguising treatment failure. A chronic relapsing seronegative disease DOES NOT fit the vaccine model because you cannot prove vaccine efficacy in a disease where we don’t know who has or does not have the infection! So, deny the chronically infected by suppressing all evidence of antibiotic resistance, claim that the infection is easily treated because newer curative treatment for all stages of disease would give the public an excuse not to take the vaccine, reject all direct-detection methods that prove chronic infection and voila! move forward with patent royalties, vaccine development and pharmaceutical profits. The federal watchdog is no more. People suffering and dying and for what? Lyme for Profit.

The CDC has propagated this false Lyme disease narrative for decades and to this day refuses to recognize the disabling stage of the disease exposed in the documentaries Under our Skin and The Quiet Epidemic.

You may want to read the following Newsweek article published April 2024 by Lindsay Keys Co-Director of The Quiet Epidemic as it describes precisely what affect suppressing/concealing antibiotic resistance has had on the patient population…

Lyme Disease Is Quietly Debilitating Millions of Americans and Future Generations | Opinion
https://www.newsweek.com/lyme-disease-quietly-debilitating-millions-americans-future-generations-opinion-1885764

Excerpt: 

Lyme costs the U.S. an estimated $1 billion annually. Chronic Lyme patients are going bankrupt, suffering from job loss, and experiencing high rates of suicide. The history of Lyme has been plagued with controversy—a National Institutes of Health (NIH) official once referred to patients as “Lyme loonies.” Given the widespread suffering and economic burden, we were shocked to discover Lyme diagnostics and treatments have not advanced since the 1990s. Due to a lack of research, the mainstream medical community resorts to telling people it’s in their heads.

Carl Tuttle
Independent Researcher
Hudson, NH USA

Category:

Activism, Lyme, research, Testing, Treatment, vaccines, Viruses

BREAKING: 86% of PCR-Positive ‘COVID Cases’ Not Real Infections & 1st Peer Reviewed Evidence Shows COVID Shots Based on Faulty Statistics

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-86-of-pcr-positive-covid?

BREAKING: 86% of PCR-Positive “COVID Cases” Were Not Real Infections

New study finds that during the early pandemic period, only 14% of PCR “COVID cases” were real — proving that lockdowns and vaccine mandates were built on a fraudulent testing illusion.

Nov 07, 2025

ByNicolas Hulscher, MPH

A bombshell peer-reviewed study out of Germany just dismantled the scientific foundation used to justify lockdowns, social distancing, and vaccine mandates.

Researchers analyzed data from the Akkreditierte Labore in der Medizin (ALM) — a nationwide consortium of authority-accredited medical laboratories that performed roughly 90% of all SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests in Germany between 2020 and 2023.

When researchers compared the ALM’s week-by-week PCR positivity rates with the same labs’ IgG antibody testing data — essentially measuring who truly developed infection-induced immunity — they discovered something staggering:

Only about 14% of those who tested PCR-positive during the early pandemic period (2020–mid-2021) actually developed antibodies — meaning most early “cases” were never real infections.

Even under the most conservative assumptions — correcting for possible overrepresentation of IgG-positive individuals in the sample — the true infection fraction fell to roughly 10%, implying that nearly 90% of PCR positives were false or non-infectious detections, often just residual RNA fragments amplified at CT thresholds of 35–45.

What This Means

  • Mass PCR testing grossly inflated case numbers worldwide. Every nation that used similar CT thresholds likely overcounted “infections” by an order of magnitude.
  • Lockdowns and mandates were built on a false metric. The German “7-day incidence” used to trigger restrictions was statistically meaningless — and identical logic applied in the U.S., U.K., and elsewhere. In America, the entire “15 Days to Slow the Spread” campaign was predicated on the same inflated PCR scam.
  • Authorities suppressed representative serology data. Germany’s RKI and Ministry of Health had access to these ALM antibody results but never disclosed them — despite their policy relevance.
  • Rewriting pandemic history. If only 10–14% of reported PCR “cases” during the first year reflected true infections, then the infection-fatality rate, transmission models, and emergency declarations were all built on sand. By the end of 2020—months before vaccination began—roughly one-quarter of Germany’s population already carried natural antibodies. In other words, while authorities were declaring an uncontrolled crisis, herd-level immunity was already taking shape. By late 2021, nearly the entire population was IgG-positive. The evidence shows that pandemic policy was driven not by infection reality, but by a diagnostic illusion.

PCR technology and testing thresholds were standardized across WHO member states.
That means the same distortion likely occurred everywhere — a systemic diagnostic inflation that may be the single greatest fraud in public health history.

These tactics were likely used to amplify fear in order to boost compliance with lockdowns and experimental gene-based “vaccines.” This was demonstrated by Gao et al, who found that public fear of COVID-19 (PFC) was positively associated with the number of COVID-19 vaccinations at county-level: “as PFC increases from 0 to 300, the predicted vaccination number increases from 10,000 to 230,000.”

This is in line with fraudulent attempts to artificially increase COVID-19 death counts. Basoulis et al found that 45.3% of “COVID-19 deaths” in Greece were not actually due to COVID-19:

BREAKING — Nearly Half of “COVID-19 Deaths” Were Not Due to COVID-19, New Study Finds

BREAKING — Nearly Half of “COVID-19 Deaths” Were Not Due to COVID-19, New Study Finds

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
·
Apr 21
Read full story

In the end, most of the population did encounter the manufactured virus and develop antibodies—but the PCR data that justified global lockdowns, fear, and vaccine mandates were a complete fraud. Accountability is warranted.

https://panagispolykretis.substack.com/p/this-paper-will-shock-the-world-unveiling

This paper will SHOCK the world: Unveiling hidden biases that inflated COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness and safety

How misclassification of early post-vaccination deaths distorts mortality rates and public health assessments

Panagis Polykretis
Nov 03, 2025

Today, together with Dr. Marco Alessandria, Dr. Giovanni Trambusti, Dr. Giovanni M. Malatesta, and Dr. Alberto Donzelli, we published an crucial peer-reviewed scientific study titled “Classification bias and impact of COVID-19 vaccination on all-cause mortality: the case of the Italian Region Emilia-Romagna” [1]. In this study, we provide the first peer-reviewed evidence, based on real-world data, demonstrating how certain statistical methods have led to an overestimation of the effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 vaccines. This paper will shock the world, because it proves that all scientific studies conducted so far that are affected by this bias should be reassessed.

We addressed a critical bias that can substantially distort real-world evaluations of vaccine effectiveness and safety, known as the “case-counting window bias”. This bias, theorized by Fung et al. [2], occurs because individuals are classified as “unvaccinated” during the first 14 days after receiving the vaccine (the period believed necessary for the immune response to develop fully). As a result, any adverse events, including deaths during this time, are incorrectly attributed to the unvaccinated group, artificially inflating its mortality rate, while simultaneously underestimating mortality among vaccinated individuals.

By analyzing detailed daily data on all-cause mortality and vaccine administration in the Emilia-Romagna region (Italy), obtained through a FOIA request by lawyer Lorenzo Melacarne (in accordance with the art. 5, comma 2 of the Italian Legislative Decree No. 33/2013), we found a clear temporal coincidence between vaccination campaigns and spikes in deaths among those incorrectly classified as unvaccinated during this critical window (Figure 1).

Figure 1. The chart illustrates the daily mortality rate per 100,000 individuals (age group 70-79), comparing those vaccinated (represented by the solid red line) with those unvaccinated (shown by the solid green line). Additionally, it shows the cumulative number of vaccinations administered with at least one dose (indicated by the red dotted line) [taken from Alessandria et al., 2025].

Our statistical analysis demonstrated significant differences in mortality between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups, during the critical 14-day post-vaccination window when misclassification occurs. Importantly, these mortality differences cannot be explained solely by COVID-19 deaths, which accounted for only about 9% of all deaths in Italy in 2021. Even after excluding COVID-19-related deaths, the disparity between groups remained significant, indicating systematic misclassification rather than true vaccine benefit. We also observed that the difference diminished with age, likely reflecting the increased comorbidity burden in older individuals that influences overall mortality risk (for more detailed information, please see the article, which is published in open access format and freely available to everyone).

Our findings suggest a harvesting effect, whereby vulnerable individuals succumb shortly after vaccination, but their deaths are wrongly counted among the unvaccinated. This misclassification masks potential serious vaccine-related adverse events occurring shortly post-vaccination, such as severe allergic reactions, cardiovascular events, or autoimmune responses.  (See link for article)

_______________

**Comment**

I will reiterate: it’s all based on a sham.

And to be bloody clear: governments worldwide claim vaccines are safe and effective but can not produce the gold standard double-blind placebo-controlled trials good science relies on as proof.

Go here for this ‘must see’ clip of Del Bigtree stating:

“We’re injecting our kids with aborted fetal DNA, chopped-up organs from 3-month-old babies—76 in one study—admitted by vaccine chief Stanley Plotkin himself.

Monkey kidneys, hamster cells, cancer lines, mercury, formaldehyde… it’s a cauldron of horrors even Shakespeare couldn’t imagine.

And the worst part?

They admit: ‘We never studied this. We don’t know what it does.’

This isn’t science—it’s a witch cult.”
  • Dr. Suzanne Humphries who was raked over the coals for even daring to question the ‘vaccine’ religion states:

“Vaccination Introduced Animal Infections into Humanity.”  Source

Wakefield also directed the documentary “Protocol 7,” which exposes real-life events of an actively litigated case in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals against Merck for fraudulent activity behind the MMR vaccine.   The vaccine fails to protect against measles, destroys natural immunity, and the CDC admits as many as 94% of children who contracted mumps were vaccinated.  Go here for a scientists rebuttal to the Danish MMR vaccine cohort study.

The Merck case was managed to largely avoid public scrutiny, despite its outcome being very much in the public interest. The film script was written years ago but they sat on it waiting for the court case to be resolved.

The case documents were sealed until recently. They are now being unsealed, albeit in a piecemeal manner. Available documents, including complaints, expert opinions, deposition testimony etc can be found here, which shows the actual fraud was much, much worse than what is presented in the film.

CDC scientist William Thompson admitted scientists purposely destroyed data.
“The omitted data suggested that African-American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism.”  Dr. William Thompson
“Decisions were made regarding the findings of the report that the data was collected and I believe that the final study protocol was not followed.”  Dr. William Thompson  Source
Thompson ONLY came forth with this AFTER he was secretly recorded by Dr. Brian Hooker, a father of a vaccine injured child.
Thompson handed over documents about this case to Congressman Bill Posey.
Within the video Posey speaks before Congress about how not only did the authors of the study withheld vital information, they destroyed evidence.  Source

Category:

Testing, vaccines, Viruses

ACTION: Breaking the Chains on Foods That Heal

https://anh-usa.org/action-alert-breaking-the-chains-on-foods-that-heal/

Breaking the Chains on Foods That Heal

By The ANH TeamOn 
Breaking the Chains on Foods That Heal

ANH-USA has released a ground-breaking Strategic Roadmap and Action Plan exposing how outdated FDA rules are blocking access to medical foods—science-based nutrition therapies that could help millions of Americans prevent, manage, and even reverse chronic disease. Our Action Plan shows how we’re going to fix it. It’s time to educate Congress: sign our Action Alert now!

THE TOPLINE

  • America is facing a chronic disease crisis, yet FDA rules restrict access to medical foods—nutrition-based therapies designed to meet the special dietary needs of people with diagnosed health conditions.
  • By treating these foods like drugs, FDA policy has stifled innovation, discouraged research, and cut off patients from affordable, safe, and effective nutrition-based care.
  • ANH-USA’s roadmap lays out how to modernize medical food policy, broaden access, and bring the “food is medicine” vision to life.

A Healthcare System That’s Failing Us

Despite spending over 16% of our GDP on healthcare—more than any other country—the United States ranks a shocking 80th in healthy life expectancy, projected to fall even further by 2050. Today, 133 million Americans live with at least one chronic disease, and 42% have two or more.

How can a nation that spends so much on health be so sick? Because we’ve built a healthcare system that waits for people to get sick—and then treats them with drugs that are expensive, dangerous, and do not address the root cause of illness in the first place.

There’s a better way.

>>>Download ANH-USA Strategic Roadmap and Action Plan, Medical Foods: Unlocking Access and Value

The Untapped Power of Medical Foods

Medical foods (MFs) are specially formulated products that provide targeted nutrition for people whose dietary needs cannot be met by regular foods alone. They’re used in hospitals every day, often in the form of shakes, powders, or enteral (feeding tube) formulas for patients recovering from surgery, living with metabolic disorders, or managing chronic disease.

Medical foods can help underserved populations reduce age-related disease and chronic conditions like diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and arthritis, improving health while reducing healthcare costs. They’re safe, effective, and far less expensive than many branded drugs.

So why don’t more Americans have access to them?

The Problem: A System Rigged Against Nutrition

Medical foods are trapped inside an outdated legal framework. In 1988, Congress created the medical food category in the Orphan Drug Act—a law meant to encourage the development of drugs for rare diseases.

Current rules say medical foods can only be used under a doctor’s supervision—even though most physicians receive very little training in nutrition. Meanwhile, qualified nutrition professionals like Certified Nutrition Specialists and Registered Dietitians are shut out from helping patients access these lifesaving foods.

The FDA’s interpretation of the law is so narrow that medical foods are completely shut out from addressing common chronic conditions like diabetes, heart disease, and metabolic syndrome, even though nutrition is central to their management. In its guidance document, for example, the FDA states, “There are no distinctive nutritional requirements associated with the management of [diabetes],” so medical foods cannot target diabetes.

Making matters worse, medical foods are often denied insurance reimbursement because FDA policy has left their prescription status in limbo. This is critical: our healthcare system mostly runs on insurance reimbursement. But because of the FDA’s restrictive rules, medical foods are left out of that system. As a result, most doctors and patients don’t even know these products exist—and when they do ask for them, insurance almost always refuses to cover the cost. By effectively hiding a whole category of safe, affordable nutrition-based treatments, the system blocks competition and discourages companies from investing in this promising area of medical science.

>>>Download ANH-USA Strategic Roadmap and Action Plan, Medical Foods: Unlocking Access and Value

In short: the FDA has put medical foods in handcuffs for decades while we’ve been seeing increasing rates of chronic disease that are nutrition and lifestyle related. This is crony medicine at its finest: shut out natural, nutrition-based interventions in favor of pharmaceutical monopolies over disease treatment.

Our Solution: A Roadmap for Reform

ANH-USA’s Strategic Roadmap and Action Plan offers a clear, actionable plan to fix this broken system. We’re calling for a modern framework that empowers innovation and restores nutrition to its rightful place in medicine.

Key recommendations include:

  • Modernize the definition. Update the statutory language so medical foods can address common chronic diseases, not just rare ones.
  • Expand access and supervision. Allow qualified nutrition professionals—not just doctors—to oversee medical food use.
  • Clarify prescription status and enable reimbursement. Give medical foods a clear path to coverage through Medicare, Medicaid, the Veterans Administration, and private insurers.
  • Replace regulatory intimidation with guidance. End the warning-letter culture and provide transparent, science-based rules for innovation.
  • Educate healthcare professionals. Integrate medical nutrition training into medical, nursing, dietetic, and pharmacy schools nationwide.

These changes would unleash innovation, bring competition and lower prices, and expand patient access to safe, proven, food-based therapies.

Why It Matters

Medical foods won’t replace drugs—but they can reduce the need for them. By addressing the nutritional roots of disease, medical foods can help people stay healthier, longer, while saving billions in healthcare costs.

It’s time to bring “food as medicine” from rhetoric to reality.

Action Alert!

(Go to top link to take action)

For more:

The importance of nutrition with Lyme/MSIDS:

The power of fasting:

Category:

Activism, diet and nutrition, Lyme

Tenenbaum Cancer Protocol

I continue to marvel at the many silver linings of the disastrous COVID era. One such silver lining is the plethora of information not only about successful cancer treatments but the truth about the very nature of it. Since a recent paper shows that chemotherapy the current poison treatment of choice that oncologists get a direct cut from, has a 97.9% failure rate in the U.S. over five years, these treatments are just in time as the American Cancer Society Projects diagnoses to exceed 2 MILLION in 2025.

Due to the fact ‘the powers that be’ have proven to be unbelievably corrupt hooligans, people have begun to realize that they in fact have a brain they can use for themselves!  

This awakening has brought many to the conclusion they can research, learn, and experiment just as well as those in a fraudulent, indoctrinated medical machine for profit which spews out mostly corrupt people with a few letters after his or her name.  (There are always rare exceptions and thank God for them!)

The world has already been regaled with the success of the Joe Tippen’s Protocol, Dr. Marik’s success, Dr. Makis’ success, Mel Gibson’s testimony of 3 friends healed of stage four cancer, a major review paper showing high dose IV vitamin C (75-100g, 2-3X week for 6-8 cycles) as a promising anti-cancer agent, and entire websites dedicated to high level guidance based on research for the layman who is interested in cancer treatments.  (COVID mania also exposed the ‘good guy’ doctors who were and continue to be tenaciously persecuted for daring to think for themselves)

Now we have the astounding success of Guy Tenenbaum, a 71 year old with stage 4 prostate cancer who was given a death sentence by all the doctors he consulted with, and who realized he had to rescue himself.  He studied the Metabolic Theory of Cancer, the work of Dr. Otto Warburg and Dr. Wilhelm Brunings [06:41], and discovered the key, autophagy, related to the work of Dr. Yoshinori Ohsumi [06:54]. Many studies built on Ohsumi’s foundational work and applied it to cancer. Autophagy, the lysosomal clean-up of cellular debris, is controlled by the mTOR pathway and is turned on by fasting.  Fasting can also enhance chemotherapy and radiation effectiveness and dramatically lessen its toxicity.  Tenenbaum wrote “My Battle Against Cancer – Survivor Protocol,” “Beat Cancer to Cure From Cancer,” and co-authored “Can We Heal From Cancer? Guy and Fred Did it…..and Here’s How.”

It appears the medical machine refuses to apply previously done work to current diseases because there isn’t any money or power in it. 
You think NIAID will give grants for that?  Think again.

Guy Tenenbaum’s Cancer Protocol

  • Fast for 42 days, consuming nothing but water and occasional coffee or tea
  • Take 1,000mg of aged garlic (scientists believe it’s responsible for 30% of his recovery). Go here for research on how aged garlic:
    • reduced stomach cancer by 52% due to reducing IGF-1, activating autophagy, suppressing a master switch controlling inflammation & cancer stem cell survival, and enhancing Natural Killer Cells by up to 300%.
    • even 17 years after stopping it, subjects still had a 34% lower cancer mortality
    • has an anti-aging effect, slows heart disease progression, improves brain health, and beats EGCG and curcumin due to its bioavailability, clinical results, and track record.
    • causes blood levels peak within hours but clinical benefits usually appear:
      • 2-4 weeks – improved blood pressure and inflammation markers
      • 3 months – max cardiovascular benefits
      • 6-12 months – cancer prevention and longevity benefits

Tenenbaum continues to take aged garlic now with meals for better absorption. After his drastic self- experiment his PSA dropped from 58 to 0.1 and scans showed his bone metastases were healing.  Six years later, he remains cancer-free.  

It’s important to note that aged garlic is quite different from regular garlic or even odorless garlic due to the proprietary aging process which converts harsh compounds into gentle, beneficial ones, which have no odor and cause no irritation.  It would require 10-20 cloves of raw garlic a day to achieve 1,000mg.  I must add as a personal side note that I actually took 16 cloves of crushed garlic daily, broken down into 4 doses when I first got Lyme/MSIDS, based on the advice of a Master Herbalist.  I did it for 2 weeks and it nearly killed me.  First, I smelled like I came straight out of Shanghai (the kids banned me from the car), and second my stomach revolted toward the end.  It was just too harsh.  I will state it made me herx initially, so it gave some benefit.

Due to Tenenbaum’s success, there are now two clinical trials now in the works testing prolonged fasting and fasting-mimicking diets in prostate cancer patients.

The following tables are helpful comparing autophagy effectiveness:

Source

This seminal work has shown there there appears to be an autophagy threshold for cancer suppression, growth factor starvation, insulin suppression, Warburg effect reversal, and sustained immune activation, which the 42 day fast meets but the 16 hour intermittent fast doesn’t.

This analysis demonstrates that dose-response matters dramatically in fasting-induced autophagy:

  • Mild fasting (16h): 20-30% tumor growth slowing ✓ (good)

  • Extended fasting (5-7d cycles): 10-25% remission rates ✓ (better)

  • Prolonged fasting (42d continuous): 100% remission rate ✓ (transformational)

Milder Ways to Induce Autophagy for the average Joe

Let’s say you don’t have cancer but you want to incorporate helpful aspects of Tennenbaum’s protocol in a more sustainable manner for prevention or other issues? 

Regarding clearing of spike proteins from those who got the COVID shots, as well as curing Dr. Marik’s Type II Diabetes:

“Autophagy can be upregulated by fasting and calorie restriction [2], especially if protein is reduced [3]. Autophagy in many instances does not require the complete cessation of food intake (protocols are available at https://COVID19criticalcare.com/treatment-protocols/, accessed on 15 April 2023). Sharply decreasing protein intake can upregulate autophagy pathways [4], and this can be accomplished while still eating, which makes this more approachable as a protocol. Regular fasting was also associated with better outcomes from acute COVID-19 [5].  Source

For Average Risk Individuals

Daily: 16:8 Time-Restricted Eating

  • Fast 16 hours (e.g., 8pm – 12pm)

  • Eat 8 hours (12pm – 8pm)

Quarterly: 4-5 Day Fasting-Mimicking Diet

  • Every 3 months (4x per year)

  • 1,100 cal day 1; 500 cal/day days 2-5

Expected Results:

  • ✅ Cancer risk reduction: 40-60%

  • ✅ Sustainability: Excellent (85-95%)

  • ✅ Evidence level: Strong (multiple human RCTs)

For High-Risk Individuals (Family History, Genetic Risk)

Daily: 18:6 Time-Restricted Eating

  • Fast 18 hours (6pm – 12pm)

  • Eat 6 hours (12pm – 6pm)

Monthly: 48-72 Hour Water Fast

  • Once per month

  • Water, tea, coffee only

Quarterly: 4-5 Day FMD

  • Every 2-3 months

Expected Results:

    • ✅ Cancer risk reduction: 50-70%

    • ✅ Sustainability: Good-Excellent (70-85%)

    • ✅ Evidence level: Very Strong

Optimal Combined Protocol (50-70% Prevention)

DAILY FOUNDATION:

  • ✅ 16:8 Time-Restricted Eating (minimum)

  • ✅ 18:6 TRE for high-risk individuals

  • ✅ Eating window: 12pm – 6pm or 10am – 6pm

  • ✅ Black coffee, tea, water allowed during fast

QUARTERLY INTENSIVE:

  • ✅ Fasting-Mimicking Diet 4 times per year

  • ✅ Day 1: 1,100 calories (plant-based)

  • ✅ Days 2-5: 500 calories/day

  • ✅ ProLon kit or DIY version

  • ✅ Schedule: Jan, April, July, October

OPTIONAL MONTHLY BOOST (High Risk):

  • ✅ 48-72 hour water fast once per month

  • ✅ Or extend one FMD to 7 days

SYNERGISTIC ADDITIONS:

  • ✅ Aged Garlic Extract 2.4g/day

  • ✅ Green tea 3+ cups/day (especially lung cancer prevention)

  • ✅ Curcumin 500mg BID with piperine

  • ✅ Whole food, plant-based diet during eating windows

Go here for source and all research studies.

Repurposed Drugs for Cancer

By Paul E. Marik, MD, FCCM, FCCP and Justus R. Hope, MD

https://imahealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/approach-to-repurposed-drugs-for-cancer.pdf

We can be extremely thankful that COVID produced some amazingly unexpected benefits in how cancer and many other disease processes is being treated.

I’ll bet the medical machine didn’t predict their tyranny would promote invention!

For more:

Category:

Activism, Cancer, diet and nutrition, Herbs, Inflammation, Prevention, research, Supplements, Treatment

The Pfizer Job

Before reading the following unbelievably detailed analysis that took the author and his team over 3 years to complete, it’s important to note that ‘the powers that be’ aren’t getting the memo. Bill Gates recently had two meetings at the White House with President Trump and not only wants to inject cows and start putting scary additives into their food to supposedly reduce methane, but he’s funding a new micro-needle patch implant that installs both mRNA and quantum-dot markings into the body. Dr. Jessica Rose has broken it all down here.  Suffice it to say that it’s even worse than the mRNA shots.  In Rose’s words:

[It] involves taking the N1-modified mRNA-LNP technology (Pfizer/Moderna idea) to the next level of crazy, in my opinion.

And, Moderna has just unveiled a new mRNA shot called ‘mNEXSPIKE’ which translated in Latin means ‘violent death, or ‘death spear.’  You seriously can’t make this up.

Does anyone else out there get the distinct impression they want us dead?

https://www.arkmedic.info/p/the-pfizer-job?

The Pfizer Job

How Pfizer carried out the biggest pharma trial heist ever – and the regulators swallowed it hook, line and sinker.

Dr Ah Kahn Syed
Oct 12, 2025
Remember this?

Article Excerpts:

“Pfizer’s vaccine is more than 90% effective”.

Headlines repeated around the world and more importantly by the regulators FDA, TGA, EMA and MHRA.

Just to reiterate – this was about COVID infection. No claims on severity, hospitalisation or death were made by Pfizer.

Given that most of the vaccinated population actually “got COVID” – many of them multiple times, that sounds impossible, right?

That’s because it was.

Yet the trial itself showed 95% reduction in the risk of infection and was published in the infamous New England Journal of Medicine (the same journal that published the fraudulent Surgisphere study) on the 10th December 2020.

….we are going to show that the whole study was a sham and that there never was a benefit – at all, never mind “95% reduction in infection.”  (See link for article)

________________

**Comment**

I’m eternally grateful that researchers and doctors are now onto the prolific research fraud that has been taking place.  Of course, this fraud has been going on in Lymeland for over 40 years, but now it’s on display for the entire world to see.  Yet another silver lining that came out of COVID mania.

SUMMARY:

  • One of the main Pfizer hustles was mandating all PCR swabs for the trial be sent to their own lab in New York as part of the case definition.  Which means that Pfizer decided whether a swab was positive or negative – the only test that mattered.
  • We only know this is due to a FOIA by attorney Aaron Siri.  Pfizer and the FDA tried to withhold this intel for 75 years.
  • Another hustle concerns dates.  The cut off for the trial was Nov. 14, 2020.  The VRBPAC meeting was on Dec. 10, 2020, the same day the trial was published.  The VRBPAC assessment document for the Pfizer submission was written on Dec. 7, 2020, just two weeks after the submission – having to assess 44,000 participants.  The approval was made on the basis of 47 days of follow-up for most patients, but was also made in ONE DAY, because of the VRBPAC meeting on Dec. 20, 2020 – with EUA declared on Dec. 11, 2020.  Certainly a miracle.
  • The dates demonstrate that all of this was impossible, which implies it was a pre-agreed approval based upon Pfizer showing data that there were less infections in the ‘vaccinated’ group based on a test they controlled – not on clinical symptoms.
  • Evidently, Doran Fink of the FDA presented in the VRBPAC meeting despite having no clinical data and no experience in handling large data sets.  Unblinding in the trial was not allowed to happen until after Nov. 14, 2020, yet somehow Pfizer knew what was in which arm before that date.  Interestingly, Fink was then given a job at Moderna and now is at GSK, demonstrating clearly the revolving door between the FDA and Big Pharma.
  • Even more miraculously Pfizer, the WEF, and mainstream media already knew by the 9th of November that the ‘vaccine’ had ‘worked’ despite the fact the data cut off was Nov. 14.
  • Susan K Wollersheim’s ability to give the statistical presentation for VRBPAC on a 44,000 participant clinical trial is legendary as she has never published a clinical research study7.  
  • There is no way Fink and Wollersheim did the analysis as they don’t have the skill set and they didn’t have the time necessary to do it.
  • The good doctor who authored this article, Dr Ah Kahn Syed, states that it took him and a handful of people with the skillset required 3 years to sift through over 2 MILLION pages of FDA documents to just write this article.
  • Moderna achieved a similar EUA approval only 7 days later due to a similar hustle.
  • The third hustle: they stopped accumulating cases (in the “vaccinated group” only) for a specified time period in order to make the cut.
  • A tactic they probably used, since they solely controlled testing, was to change the Cycle threshold on the machine recording the tests.  A Ct of over 40 will pick up a bunch of false positives and a low Ct of less than 16 will only pick up real cases with a high viral load.  They didn’t know the ‘sweet spot,’ so they had to change Ct as they went along.  The field that should have recorded the Ct on the machine is conveniently missing.
  • Pfizer knew which tests were from the ‘vaccinated’ or the placebo group because they had the blood tests from every person in the study at their lab. Castruita showed in 2023 that even after 4 weeks there was enough circulating RNA (or DNA) from the COVID-19 vaccines to be able to perform genomic sequencing13.  While unlocking the database would create audit flags, they could easily identify who got what without raising audit flags, so they could then adjust the Ct up or down depending upon the number of positive tests they needed.
  • The author proves that if you correct for the fact that, if you’re vaccinated, you have 2.3x less chance of showing N-antibody on a test, the infection rate of the ‘vaccinated’ and of the placebo group is identical.  There was no 95% reduction in infection in the ‘vaccinated’ group at all.  It was a scam.
  • The author also shows from The FDA’s review that there were over 1100 more fevers and over 2000 more reports of chills in the ‘vaccinated’ group.

Sadly, all of this should have been done before ‘Operation Warp-speed,’ but let this be a solid reminder to not take ANYTHING until you are fully convinced it truly works and is safe.  In short, do not believe anything the medical machine for profit says.  Before you take anything they recommend, wait until independent research has been done.

There are probably many, many people who are now living with a lot of regret.

Category:

Activism, Testing, vaccines, Viruses