Author Archive

FBI Pressured U.S. Customs to Ditch Plan to Question Key Fauci Aide on Return Trip From Wuhan

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/fbi-pressured-us-customs-ditch-plan-question-key-fauci-aide-wuhan/?

FBI Pressured U.S. Customs to Ditch Plan to Question Key Fauci Aide on Return Trip From Wuhan

The FBI intervened to prevent U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents from questioning “virus hunter” Peter Daszak, Ph.D., on a return trip from Wuhan, China, according to documents released this week by Sen. Rand Paul. Three days before Daszak was scheduled to arrive in New York, a CBP Joint Terrorism Task Force liaison wrote, “Please be advised FBI New York requested we do not stop the subject.”

by Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.

July 23, 2026

This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website.

fbi website and peter daszak

The FBI intervened to prevent U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents from questioning “virus hunter” Peter Daszak, Ph.D., on a return trip from Wuhan, China, according to documents released this week by Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.).

The documents show that in February 2021, Daszak, a key aide to Dr. Anthony Fauci and then-president of the EcoHealth Alliance, traveled to Wuhan as part of a World Health Organization (WHO) investigation into the origins of COVID-19.

CBP planned to stop and question Daszak on his return to the U.S. that month. But in an email dated Feb. 2, 2021 — three days before Daszak was scheduled to arrive in New York — a CBP Joint Terrorism Task Force liaison wrote, “Please be advised FBI New York requested we do not stop the subject.”

The CBP Tactical Terrorism Response Team was prepared to question Daszak about the business he conducted in China, his contacts at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and whether he collected or was carrying any samples of viruses or other pathogens.

One document states that CBP viewed Daszak as “an extremely high person of interest” due to his longstanding ties with the Wuhan laboratory.

A Jan. 11, 2021, CBP email flagged Daszak’s participation in the WHO’s team investigating the pandemic’s origins in Wuhan as a potential “conflict of interest.”

A Feb. 2, 2021, email noted that much of the funding Daszak was receiving was “put toward gain of function research.”

Notably, a U.S. Department of Homeland Security email contained within the documents, which provided background information on Daszak’s research activity, referenced an article The Defender published in January 2021.

Paul released the documents as part of his ongoing congressional investigation into the origins of COVID-19. In a post on X earlier this week, he said the documents challenge the narrative that a lab leak was implausible.

“The American people can finally judge the evidence for themselves,” Paul wrote.

https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?dnt=false&embedId=twitter-widget-0&features=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%3D%3D&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=2080050254020313160&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fchildrenshealthdefense.org%2Fdefender%2Ffbi-pressured-us-customs-ditch-plan-question-key-fauci-aide-wuhan%2F&sessionId=f9ddbe0e048db7a5735305a17202bf484e642a97&siteScreenName=ChildrensHD&theme=light&widgetsVersion=6a3ad42b224df%3A1778106238597&width=550px

Speaking to The National Desk on Tuesday, Paul said the documents showed that figures in the federal government “wanted to protect” the narrative that COVID-19 originated in, and escaped from, a lab, so they “used whatever means necessary to do it.”

“It’s no surprise that they would use the law enforcement enterprise to achieve that,” Paul said.

Jeffrey Tucker, president and founder of the Brownstone Institute, said the documents confirm the “worst versions of what we’ve suspected” and provide “more empirical evidence than ever” of a concerted effort by figures in the federal government to conceal a lab leak in Wuhan.

“There was a high-level plan to protect the virus creators as part of a longer-term scheme to deploy both pathogens and countermeasures, likely for the purpose of political manipulation, as incredible as that sounds,” Tucker said.

NIH asked Daszak to bring SARS-CoV-2 specimen to the U.S.

The documents contained evidence that the National Institutes of Health (NIH) asked Daszak to obtain the original type specimen of SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19, and bring it to the U.S.

According to those who believe COVID-19 leaked from a lab, the virus was likely produced through gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab, and later escaped.

Gain-of-function research increases the virulence or transmissibility of viruses and is often used in vaccine development.

Fox News reported that Daszak and EcoHealth Alliance had collaborated with the Wuhan lab for over 15 years, including with the lab’s lead researcher, Shi Zhengli, Ph.D., widely known as the “bat lady.”

Daszak was also principal investigator on NIH grants that funded bat coronavirus research at the Wuhan lab.

The documents were released just days before Fauci is set to testify before the U.S. Congress on July 29, as part of Paul’s investigation.

The document release also came a month after two NIH researchers with ties to Daszak and EcoHealth Alliance were arrested and charged with smuggling mpox samples into the U.S.

Documents Paul released last month revealed that Fauci received a U.S. intelligence report in August 2021 suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 was developed in Chinese and U.S. labs as a bat vaccine, that it later leaked from the Wuhan lab and that it contained characteristics that would make it resistant to mRNA vaccines.

In May, a CIA whistleblower testified before Congress that Fauci led a multi-agency cover-up of COVID-19’s origins and that “Dr. Fauci’s role in the cover-up was intentional.”

In 2024, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) suspended all funding for EcoHealth Alliance after finding the organization failed to monitor risky coronavirus experiments.

Last year, Daszak became president of Nature.Health.Global — a nonprofit organization that performs research on public health and pandemic prevention. The group employs Dr. David Morens, a former top aide to Fauci.

In April, a federal grand jury indicted Morens on charges related to conspiracy to hide federal records on COVID-19’s origins.

This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Please consider subscribing to The Defender or donating to Children’s Health Defense.

Related articles in The Defender

For more:

Category:

Activism, Viruses

Self-Reported Observations of Unusual White Fibrous Structures in Embalmed Corpses: Multi-Year Survey Results

https://ijirms.in/index.php/ijirms/article/view/2201

Self-Reported Observations of Unusual White Fibrous Structures in Embalmed Corpses: Multi-Year Survey Results from Embalmers in Five Countries, 2022–2025

Thomas F. Haviland*·Laura Kasner·Daniel SantiagoiD

DOI:10.23958/ijirms/vol11-i07/2201· Pages: 204 – 208· Vol. 11, No. 07, (2026)· Published: July 1, 2026

PDFCitationShare

Views: 22,752 PDF downloads: 6,044

Abstract

Background: Beginning in 2020–2021, embalmers in multiple countries reported observing large, tough, rubbery white or off-white fibrous structures in the veins and arteries of embalmed corpses, which they described as distinct from classic postmortem clots.

Methods: We conducted four annual cross-sectional surveys (2022–2025) of active embalmers in the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand using SurveyMonkey. A dual distribution strategy (professional associations and direct emails to funeral homes) was used. Core questions assessed observation of unusual white fibrous structures and estimated percentage of corpses affected.

Results: Across 808 total responses, the proportion of embalmers reporting observation of these structures ranged from 66% to 83%. Weighted average prevalence in affected corpses ranged from 19% to 27%. The 2022 survey showed a marked increase in first observations beginning in 2020 and accelerating in 2021.

Conclusions: Multiple years of surveys document consistent self-reported observations by experienced embalmers of unusual white fibrous structures in a substantial fraction of corpses, with a clear increase noted around 2020–2021. These findings constitute a potential safety signal that warrants independent investigation by forensic pathologists and biomedical researchers to characterize the structures and determine their etiology.

(Click on top link for full article and pictures)

New White Fibrous Clots Publication

Dr. John Campbell

July 23, 2026

________________

**Comment**

For the ‘science’ skeptics out there, this is what research looks like when no ‘external’ funding or grants are received. Hence the use of SurveyMonkey.

Researchers know that when they study a topic that doesn’t fit the narrative, they are entirely on their own. No large NIH grants should be expected because our government is completely in bed with Big Pharma, who literally couldn’t care less if you live or die.

Lymeland has been in this lovely parallel universe for nigh on 40 years. Any research that moves the needle forward at all is independently funded and since research has become so incredibly expensive, cheap tools like SurveyMonkey are utilized.

In the case of Lyme/MSIDS, it is often called “Big Data,’ and relies on patient surveys. If you haven’t done it already, make sure to fill out the MyLymeData Project which allows patients to pool their health information through a secure website. “Big data” projects use advanced technology to gather and analyze huge amounts of patient data, which can assist researchers in studying disease patterns and answering important questions such as why do some people recover from Lyme disease, while others remain ill?

For more on the clots found in the COVID injected:

Category:

Activism, Heart Issues, Inflammation, research, vaccines

Old Molecule, New Evidence: Chlorine Dioxide Shows Promise in 3 Veterinary Cases

https://imahealth.substack.com/p/old-molecule-new-evidence-chlorine?

Old Molecule, New Evidence: Chlorine Dioxide Shows Promise in Three Veterinary Cases

Three animals with limited options improved after treatment with chlorine dioxide. A new case series in the Journal of Independent Medicine documents what happened.

Independent Medical Alliance

May 27, 2026

The FDA calls chlorine dioxide “a dangerous bleach.” Millions of people drink low doses of it every day in treated tap water. And clinicians and veterinarians have been quietly using it for years to treat conditions that conventional medicine couldn’t resolve.

A new case series in the Journal of Independent Medicine puts clinical outcomes on the record for the first time in veterinary medicine.

Teresa Carr, a veterinarian with 30 years of clinical experience, and Mitchell Liester, MD, an adjoint assistant professor in the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Colorado School of Medicine, documented what happened when they used chlorine dioxide protocols on three animals that had run out of conventional options. A dog with suspected liver cancer. A cat with an infection that wouldn’t respond to antibiotics. A dog with a large, painful mammary tumor. All three improved.

“I began independently researching alternative therapies for patients with more complex conditions.” — Teresa Carr

📖 Read and Download the Full Paper

Chlorine Dioxide as an Adjunctive Treatment in Three Veterinary Cases: A Case Series (JIM Vol. 2, No. 3, 2026) — Authors: Teresa Carr and Mitchell Liester

What Chlorine Dioxide Is

Chlorine dioxide is a selective oxidant first synthesized in 1811. This is not the stuff you accidentally gulped at the swimming pool as a kid. It is a distinct molecule with a different mechanism of action: it selectively oxidizes specific amino acids in microbial proteins, disrupting their function and replication. That gives it broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity against bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites.

“Chlorine dioxide was synthesized over 200 years ago, but was primarily used as a water treatment agent. It also has broad spectrum antimicrobial activity against bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites.” — Mitchell Liester

Regulatory agencies have approved it for water treatment, food safety, and medical equipment sterilization. The antimicrobial properties are not in dispute. What’s been missing is formal clinical investigation.

The human data that does exist is promising. Studies have documented improved glucose control, reduced inflammation, enhanced wound healing, and activity against antibiotic-resistant pathogens. A case series showed complete resolution of treatment-refractory diabetic foot ulcers, with one patient achieving sustained medication-free glycemic control for three years.

The Safety Question

The FDA labeled chlorine dioxide “a dangerous bleach” during the COVID pandemic and pursued criminal enforcement against people promoting its use. Carr and Liester argue that label was based on high-dose misuse, not on the low-dose therapeutic protocols practitioners are actually using.

“The FDA during the COVID pandemic labeled chlorine dioxide a dangerous bleach. Now, this was based on very high doses being misused, not on the low doses that have been demonstrated to be safe.” — Mitchell Liester

The safety data at low doses tells a different story:

  • The EPA established a no-observed-adverse-effect level of 3 mg/kg/day for oral chlorine dioxide
  • Phase I and II clinical trials for ALS confirmed that IV sodium chlorite at doses up to 3.2 mg/kg/day was safe and well-tolerated, with no serious adverse events
  • Millions of people consume low-dose chlorine dioxide daily in municipal drinking water
  • In these three veterinary cases, no adverse effects across enema, oral, and intratumoral routes over treatment periods ranging from 10 days to 8 months

Calling this compound “a dangerous bleach” while millions drink it daily is, as the authors put it, like labeling chemotherapy a poison based solely on high-dose toxicity.

Why the Evidence Stays Thin

If the safety data is there and practitioners are already using it, why does the evidence base remain so limited?

The answer is structural. Chlorine dioxide cannot be patented. That means no pharmaceutical company has a financial incentive to fund the controlled trials that regulators require for approval. Regulators prohibit its therapeutic use because those trials don’t exist. And the prohibition makes it harder for researchers to generate the data that would justify lifting it.

“This compound is not patentable, and therefore it’s unlikely that pharmaceutical companies will want to fund further research.” — Mitchell Liester

(See top link for article and video)

________________

For more:

Category:

Lyme, Malaria, research, Treatment

Graphene: The Wonder Material They’re Deploying Inside You

https://falkentheater.substack.com/p/graphene-the-wonder-material-theyre?

GRAPHENE: THE WONDER MATERIAL THEY’RE DEPLOYING INSIDE YOU

THE BRAIN IS THE BATTLEFIELD — Article Series : Article 1 of 7

Falken

Mar 07, 2026

What Is Graphene – The 'Wonder Material' Changing Technology but is it harmful? – Waatea News: Māori Radio Station

THE BRAIN IS THE BATTLEFIELD — Article Series : Article 1 of 7

Published as part of the investigative series synthesizing the documented research dossier ‘Homo Chimericus’ (January 2024) — cross-referenced with peer-reviewed literature, EU Commission records, and publicly available institutional documentation.

INTRODUCTION: The Story You Were Told

The story most people know goes like this: graphene is a revolutionary material — a single layer of carbon atoms arranged in a hexagonal lattice, first isolated in 2004 at the University of Manchester by Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov, who promptly won the 2010 Nobel Prize in Physics for their work. It is the thinnest material ever discovered, yet stronger than steel. It conducts electricity and heat with extraordinary efficiency. It is transparent, flexible, and in theory endlessly useful.

That story is true. But it is also, profoundly and deliberately, incomplete.

What the popular narrative carefully omits is the second, parallel chapter of graphene’s development: the massive, multi-billion-euro program to develop graphene specifically as a biological interface material — to introduce it into the human body, embed it in living tissue, and use it as the foundational substrate of a digital-biological control architecture.

This first article of the series examines graphene’s material properties with precision — not to celebrate them, but to explain exactly why this material was selected for this specific purpose, and what it actually does once it is inside you.

PART 1: What Graphene Actually Is — The Science

The Carbon Lattice

Graphene is a two-dimensional allotrope of carbon — a single layer of carbon atoms arranged in a repeating hexagonal pattern, sometimes described as molecular ‘chicken-wire’. At one atom thick, it occupies essentially no physical space in the third dimension. It is the flattest material in existence.

From this minimal structure emerge extraordinary physical properties. Graphene’s electron mobility — the ease with which electrical charge moves through it — reaches approximately 200,000 cm²/V·s at room temperature, far exceeding copper or silicon. Its thermal conductivity reaches 5,000 W/m·K — more than ten times that of copper. Its tensile strength is approximately 130 GPa, making it roughly 200 times stronger than structural steel.

These properties, separately, would already be remarkable. Together, in a material that is biocompatible, flexible, and manufacturable, they become transformative — and, in the wrong hands, something more concerning.

The Graphene Family

Research institutions working on biological graphene deployment draw on a family of related materials, each with distinct properties:

  • Graphene Oxide (GO) — graphene chemically modified with oxygen functional groups. Water-dispersible, and therefore injectable in aqueous solutions. Extensively documented in biomedical delivery research.
  • Reduced Graphene Oxide (rGO) — GO with most oxygen groups removed. More electrically conductive. Used in neural electrode and biosensor applications.
  • Carbon Nanotubes (CNTs) — rolled graphene sheets forming cylindrical structures. Extraordinary tensile strength and electrical conductivity. Can penetrate cell membranes.
  • Graphene Quantum Dots (GQDs) — graphene fragments at nanoscale (sub-10 nm). Highly fluorescent, demonstrably taken up by neurons, and capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier.
  • Graphene Nanoribbons (GNRs) — narrow strips of graphene specifically used as plasmonic nano-antennas resonating in the Terahertz frequency band — the exact band designated for 6G wireless communications.

◆ KEY TECHNICAL POINT:

A graphene nanoribbon of 1 micrometer length and 10–100 nanometer width functions as a plasmonic antenna resonating in the Terahertz band (0.1–10 THz). This is not incidental. It is the structural backbone connecting graphene-based biological materials to 6G telecommunications infrastructure — a convergence explored in depth in Article 2.

PART 2: Graphene in Biological Systems

Blood-Brain Barrier Penetration

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is among the body’s most critical protective filters — a specialized network of endothelial cells that tightly regulates what can pass from the bloodstream into the brain. Most pharmaceutical drugs cannot cross it. Graphene quantum dots, in specific size ranges, can — a fact documented in peer-reviewed animal studies and multiple review papers in journals including ACS Nano and Nature Nanotechnology.

Once inside the brain, graphene materials interact directly with neurons. Research published in Nature Communications documented that graphene substrates in contact with neurons modulate synaptic transmission — altering the frequency and amplitude of neural firing. The mechanism involves graphene’s ability to alter the potassium ion environment at the neuron-material interface, which directly governs electrochemical signaling. (See link for article)

________________

**Comment**

This website has posted material on graphene due to the fact a group of scientists and researchers sued the FDA under a FOIA to force the release of hundreds of thousands of documents related to the licensing of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID shot. This forced the FDA to reveal the Pfizer COVID shots contain graphene and multiple researchers have shown they are in fact 99% graphene. The article points out that it is also in the following items: ( I highly recommend covidproject which has shown graphene in various applications, including micro-tech in all types of injectables via dark field microscopy)

If graphene is accumulating in the body due to multiple exposure over years, the threshold for achieving functional nano-network density in tissue is lower than a single, identifiable event.

According to Dr. Bryan Ardis, both bee pollen (glucose oxidase, GOD) and apple pectin draw both graphene and aluminum out of the body.

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines

Vaccines NOT Tested Against True Inert Placebo: All 3 Vaccine Technologies Are Fundamentally Unsafe

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/dr-pierre-kory-it-is-a-myth-that?

Dr. Pierre Kory: “It is a Myth That Vaccines Are Safe and Necessary…If I Had Young Children Today, They Would Not Receive a Single Vaccine.”

“…97% of SIDS deaths occur within 7 days of vaccination.”

Lioness of Judah Ministry

Jul 21, 2026

Source: Dr. Dawn Michael

Dr. Pierre Kory, MD: “It is a myth that vaccines are safe and necessary.”

“If I had young children today, they would not receive a single vaccine.” Dr. Kory explains that Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) peaks at 2, 4, and 6 months of age — exactly when infants receive multiple routine vaccinations.

He states that the government refuses to perform true placebo-controlled safety trials on vaccines. Unlike other pharmaceuticals, which undergo 2–6 years of rigorous safety testing before FDA/CDC approval, vaccines have never been subjected to the same long-term, robust safety standards.

In clinical trials, safety monitoring for adverse reactions was extremely short:

Hepatitis B vaccine: Tested on only 147 infants/children and monitored for just 5 days before approval.

Hepatitis A vaccine: Monitored for 14 days.

Meningococcal (meningitis) vaccine: Monitored for 7 days.

Prevnar (pneumococcal) vaccine: Monitored for 7 days.

MMR vaccine: Followed for 42 days.

RSV vaccine: Monitored for 30 days.

DTaP / Tdap vaccines: Monitored for 14 days.

Gardasil (HPV) vaccine: Monitored for 14 days.

Crucially, no childhood vaccine has ever been tested against a true inert saline placebo. Trial “placebos” have instead used aluminum adjuvants or other vaccines:

Gardasil trial → placebo was Hepatitis A vaccine + aluminum adjuvant

Hepatitis A trial → placebo was Hepatitis B vaccine

Influenza trial → placebo was the other flu strain vaccine

Meningitis trial → placebo was DTaP

Pertussis trial → placebo was Tetanus + Diphtheria

Polio trial → placebo was diluted polio vaccine

Vaxelis (6-in-1) trial → placebo was DTaP + Polio + Hib + Hep B

Hepatitis B trial → placebo was aluminum adjuvant alone

Dr. Kory notes that countries with the most vaccines on their infant schedules have the highest infant mortality rates.

The United States gives more infant vaccines than any other industrialized nation — and has the highest infant mortality rate among them.

He further states that 97% of SIDS deaths occur within 7 days of vaccination.

(Click on top link for video with Dr. Kory)

_________________

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/urgent-warning-from-bret-weinstein

URGENT WARNING from Bret Weinstein: ALL 3 Vaccine Technologies Are Fundamentally UNSAFE. NONE Are Safe.

The era of “safe and effective” blanket claims is over. Every vaccine technology has built-in mechanisms that harm you.

Lioness of Judah Ministry

Jul 15, 2026

Source: Valerie Anne Smith

Bret Weinstein: Every single vaccine carries severe, built-in dangers:

  1. Live Attenuated Vaccines: They can cause long-term immune compromise. Your body’s natural defenses get damaged over time.
  2. Inactivated Vaccines: They leave lingering toxins behind in your system. These don’t just disappear.
  3. mRNA Vaccines: Your own cells are turned into factories that keep producing spike protein — with all its toxic effects — long after the shot.

Weinstein’s direct conclusion: “None are fundamentally safe. They all have severe downsides.”

This isn’t theory.

This is the reality of how these technologies actually work inside the human body.

The era of “safe and effective” blanket claims is over.

Every vaccine technology has built-in mechanisms that harm you. Do your own research. Protect yourself and your family.

(Click on top link for video with Dr. Weinstein)

For more:

Category:

Activism, research, vaccines