https://ijirms.in/index.php/ijirms/article/view/2201

Self-Reported Observations of Unusual White Fibrous Structures in Embalmed Corpses: Multi-Year Survey Results from Embalmers in Five Countries, 2022–2025

Thomas F. Haviland*·Laura Kasner·Daniel SantiagoiD

DOI:10.23958/ijirms/vol11-i07/2201· Pages: 204 – 208· Vol. 11, No. 07, (2026)· Published: July 1, 2026

PDFCitationShare

Views: 22,752 PDF downloads: 6,044

Abstract

Background: Beginning in 2020–2021, embalmers in multiple countries reported observing large, tough, rubbery white or off-white fibrous structures in the veins and arteries of embalmed corpses, which they described as distinct from classic postmortem clots.

Methods: We conducted four annual cross-sectional surveys (2022–2025) of active embalmers in the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand using SurveyMonkey. A dual distribution strategy (professional associations and direct emails to funeral homes) was used. Core questions assessed observation of unusual white fibrous structures and estimated percentage of corpses affected.

Results: Across 808 total responses, the proportion of embalmers reporting observation of these structures ranged from 66% to 83%. Weighted average prevalence in affected corpses ranged from 19% to 27%. The 2022 survey showed a marked increase in first observations beginning in 2020 and accelerating in 2021.

Conclusions: Multiple years of surveys document consistent self-reported observations by experienced embalmers of unusual white fibrous structures in a substantial fraction of corpses, with a clear increase noted around 2020–2021. These findings constitute a potential safety signal that warrants independent investigation by forensic pathologists and biomedical researchers to characterize the structures and determine their etiology.

(Click on top link for full article and pictures)

New White Fibrous Clots Publication

Dr. John Campbell

July 23, 2026

________________

**Comment**

For the ‘science’ skeptics out there, this is what research looks like when no ‘external’ funding or grants are received. Hence the use of SurveyMonkey.

Researchers know that when they study a topic that doesn’t fit the narrative, they are entirely on their own. No large NIH grants should be expected because our government is completely in bed with Big Pharma, who literally couldn’t care less if you live or die.

Lymeland has been in this lovely parallel universe for nigh on 40 years. Any research that moves the needle forward at all is independently funded and since research has become so incredibly expensive, cheap tools like SurveyMonkey are utilized.

In the case of Lyme/MSIDS, it is often called “Big Data,’ and relies on patient surveys. If you haven’t done it already, make sure to fill out the MyLymeData Project which allows patients to pool their health information through a secure website. “Big data” projects use advanced technology to gather and analyze huge amounts of patient data, which can assist researchers in studying disease patterns and answering important questions such as why do some people recover from Lyme disease, while others remain ill?

For more on the clots found in the COVID injected: