This lawsuit was filed over a year ago but FDA attorney Ashley Cheung Honold is now on record stating two cringe-worthy things that medical freedom hinges upon:

  1. The FDA never prohibited the “off-label” use of ivermectin for COVID.
  2. The FDA is held accountable by the political process,’ therefore, ‘it’s not the role of the courts to fact-check the FDA’s scientific statements.’
Houston, we have numerous problems.

This reminds me of the recent Australian Senate hearings where COVID injection manufacturers insist that people were not forced to take the experimental gene therapy injections developed by the U.S. Military as “prototypes” and “counter-measures,” which are made up of more than 99% graphene, and that are linked to more adverse reactions and death than any other vaccine in the history of VAERS.

I guess it all depends upon your definition of “forced” and “mandated.”
Medical freedom was completely abandoned during COVID and should concern Lyme/MSIDS patients greatly.

In March, Dr. Pierre Kory delivered some powerful blows in a Federalist article about how dangerous it is to allow a single government agency so much power, giving it virtually the ability to control all of medicine without oversight.  Professional medical groups are completely guilty of this corruption of power as well and need to be put in check as they have come after Lyme/MSIDS doctors for decades creating an environment where doctors are too afraid to treat patients.  Doctors also feared and were coerced into complacency during COVID as well except the following who were severely persecuted for speaking out:

http://

FDA in Court For Ivermectin Statements

Aug. 11, 2023

In this court case FDA says and I quote,

“FDA was not regulating the off-label use of drugs. These statements are not regulations they have no legal consequences they don’t prohibit doctors from prescribing Ivermectin to treat COVID or for any other purpose. Quite to the contrary there are three instances I’d like to point the court to in the record that show that FDA explicitly recognizes that doctors do have the authority to prescribe ivermectin to treat COVID.”

https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/bombshell-fda-admits-guidance-on?

BOMBSHELL: FDA Admits Guidance on Ivermectin was Illegal, Invokes ‘Sovereign Immunity’ for Misleading Statements (& Crimes Against Humanity)

This Substack has chronicled the illegal war on PSYOP-19 early treatment therapies by the very perpetrators of the “pandemic,” and their associated criminal mandates. It is no surprise that the most vilified early treatment repurposed drug Ivermectin has also been by far the most effective:

PetMectin: Pharmaceutical Grade Pure Ivermectin

PetMectin: Pharmaceutical Grade Pure Ivermectin

Ivermectin is perhaps the single best treatment not just for PSYOP-19, but for the spike protein damage that is induced by the slow kill bioweapon injections. Since the rollout of the “pandemic,” ivermectin was savaged by the quisling MSM, the various illegitimate Federal government agencies and their CDC, WHO, UN, WEF, Rockefeller and Gates “nonprofit”…

The reason that the captured FDA along with their partners-in-crime the CDC, WHO, UN, WEF, CFR, DoD, Pentagon, CIA, the illegitimate Federal government, Rockefeller and Gates “nonprofits,” et al. have targeted Ivermectin is threefold: it is exceptionally effective as an early C-19 treatment, mass administration would have resulted in plummeting global (turbo) cancer rates, and this wonder drug attenuates and reverses the slow kill bioweapon DEATHVAX™ damage.

A landmark lawsuit filed against the FDA by doctors Mary Talley Bowden, Paul Marik, and Robert Apter was heard in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals yesterday. Part of this lawsuit against the FDA was specific to fraudulent and illicit claims made by the agency against Ivermectin.  (See link for article)

__________________

SUMMARY:

  • The lawyer insists the FDA did not prevent doctors from prescribing ivermectin off-label and is invoking “Sovereign Immunity.”
  • The lawyer says that even if FDA statements were misleading, the agency is not responsible for doctors losing their jobs.
  • In the most disturbing admission, he states the FDA is ‘held accountable by the political process,’ so it’s not the role of the courts to fact-check the FDA’s scientific statements.
  • This lawsuit implicates and exposes the FDA for actual crimes which mainstream media won’t touch with a 10-foot pole.
  • This tells you everything you need to know:

  • Not only is ivermectin effective against COVID, worms, and other viruses, it is highly effective at preventing and treating cancer.  No wonder it had to be eliminated.
  • Since ivermectin and fenbendazole are off-patent and they are now generic, cheap drugs, you will be hard-pressed to find much info about them.  There’s just no money to be made, and therefore no incentive to educate the public about them.
  • This website has posted information on two of the three doctors that filed this lawsuit.  Dr. Paul Marik has been an outspoken advocate for the use of ivermectin and has saved lives with it.  Dr. Bowden normally an ENT, out of necessity, has become the emergency room, a primary care physician (PCP), and has kept thousands out of the hospital with early treatment. She speaks at 6:30 in this video, “COVID -19 a Second Opinion,” which is highly recommended viewing to educate yourself on the shenanigans played in hospitals to keep people from appropriate treatment.