How long might immunity to the coronavirus last? Years, maybe even decades, according to a new study — the most hopeful answer yet to a question that has shadowed plans for widespread vaccination.
Eight months after infection, most people who have recovered still have enough immune cells to fend off the virus and prevent illness, the new data show. A slow rate of decline in the short term suggests, happily, that these cells may persist in the body for a very, very long time to come.
The research, published online, has not been peer-reviewed nor published in a scientific journal. But it is the most comprehensive and long-ranging study of immune memory to the coronavirus to date. (See link for article)
____________________
**Comment**
While it’s true this study has not been peer-reviewed or published in a bought-out scientific journal, it completely aligns with other findings and what has occurred historically for viruses.
survivors of SARS carry certain important immune cells 17 years after recovering
a study at the University of Washington show “memory” cells persist for at least 3 months after infection
a Yale immunologist is not surprised by the long-lasting response because “that’s what is supposed to happen.” Akiko Iwasaki
another immunologist stated that typically people get infected a second time but that the immune system recognizes it and resolves it so quickly you remain asymptomatic and not infectious, and that “sterilizing immunity” is rare and not the norm
the new study by Sette et al., the first to chart the immune response in such detail, looked at antibodies, B cells, and two types of T cells – to better understand the whole immune response over time
an author of the study frequently cited suggesting fading immunity admits that reinfections with the coronavirus are rare
while immunity duration is difficult to predict studies so far show even small numbers of antibodies or T & B cells may be enough and that study participants have been making “robust amounts”
emerging evidence on reinfections with common cold coronaviruses are a result of viral genetic variations and may not be relevant to COVID-19
These results along with successful COVID treatments reveal once again that an experimental, fast-tracked, adverse reaction riddled vaccine isn’t needed.
A contagion of hatred and hysteria: Oxford epidemiologist PROFESSOR SUNETRA GUPTA tells how she has been intimidated and shamed for backing shielding instead of lockdown
(See link for article)Important excerpts from Professor Sunetra Gupta:
I was utterly unprepared for the onslaught of insults, personal criticism, intimidation and threats that met our proposal. The level of vitriol and hostility, not just from members of the public online but from journalists and academics, has horrified me.
Covid-19 is not a political phenomenon. It is a public health issue — indeed, it is one so serious that the response to it has already led to a humanitarian crisis. So I have been aghast to see a political rift open up, with outright abuse meted out to those who, like me, question the orthodoxy.
At the heart of our proposal is the recognition that mass lockdowns cause enormous damage.We are already seeing how current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health.
I was also deeply concerned that lockdowns only delay the inevitable spread of the virus. Indeed, we believe that a better way forward would be to target protective measures at specific vulnerable groups, such as the elderly in care homes.
This pandemic is an international crisis. To shut down the discussion with abuse and smears — that is truly dangerous.
Yet of all the criticisms flung at us, the one I find most upsetting is the accusation that we are indulging in ‘policy-based evidence-making’ — in other words, drumming up facts to fit our ideological agenda.
According to Wikipedia, for instance, the Great Barrington Declaration was funded by a Right-wing think-tank with links to climate-change deniers.
It should be obvious to anyone that writing a short proposal and posting it on a website requires no great financing. But let me spell it out, since, apparently, I have to: I did not accept payment to co-author the Great Barrington Declaration.
But rest assured. Whatever they throw at us, it won’t do anything to sway me — or my colleagues — from the principles that sit behind what we wrote.
Professor Sunetra Gupta is an infectious disease epidemiologist and a professor of theoretical epidemiology at the Department of Zoology, University of Oxford. Her fee for this article has been donated to The Childhood Trust, a charity which fights to alleviate the impact of child poverty.
____________________
**Comment**
The AMA/CDC/FDA with a complicit media is quite adept at smear campaigns. They bully anyone who defies their narrative or attempts to compete with their lucrative products. This happens continually to Lyme doctors and alternative health providers:
DURHAM, N.C. – Nov. 10, 2020 – PRLog — Galaxy Diagnostics, Inc., the science leader in sample enrichment powered testing solutions for elusive flea and tick-borne pathogens, today announced the launch of the Nanotrap® Urine Test for Lyme Borreliosis. This urine-based Lyme antigen test provides the most sensitive direct detection of Borrelia burgdorferi infection at all stages of the disease. The test provides advantages antibody testing does not, namely:
Identifies positive cases missed by CDC-recommended Two-Tiered Testing (TTT)
Reduces concern for false positive results via direct detection of OspA proteins
Uses easy-to-collect urine sample
The revolutionary test greatly increases the likelihood of Lyme disease confirmation via innovative Nanotrap® technology developed by Ceres Nanosciences. Nanotrap® particles capture and concentrate low abundance Outer surface protein A (OspA) in urine samples confirmed by a highly sensitive Western blot.
Published data shows that the Nanotrap Urine Test is very effective for confirmation of early stage Lyme borreliosis in patients with EM rashes (24/24). Galaxy validation data (unpublished) shows that the Nanotrap® Urine Test will often confirm active infection in patients with negative TTT results. Further research is needed to confirm clinical utility for other presentations of Lyme borreliosis, including Lyme arthritis, Lyme carditis, and neuroborreliosis.
“The addition of the Nanotrap® test aligns with our mission to bring the most scientifically advanced sample enrichment technologies and diagnostic advances to the forefront of flea and tick borne disease”, said Galaxy CEO Amanda Elam. “Lyme disease is the fastest growing tick-borne illness in the United States. We are committed to improving the standard of care around detection of these elusive, low abundance pathogens to ensure better patient care for millions globally.”
Galaxy advocates for a new standard of care in Lyme Borreliosis testing and recommends a combination diagnostic protocol with Nanotrap® Urine test to confirm active infection and the CDC recommended TTT to detect the presence of antibodies.
You can order here and learn more at galaxydx.com.
About Galaxy Diagnostics
Galaxy Diagnostics is a privately held medical laboratory located in Research Triangle Park offering the only testing solutions powered by revolutionary sample enrichment technologies for elusive flea and tick borne pathogens. The company’s mission is to “Go Beyond” the limits of conventional detection by driving scientific innovation, creating new clinical knowledge through research and publication, and providing medical education and excellent customer support to healthcare providers, veterinarians, patients, and research customers in this important area of emerging infectious disease.
About Ceres Nanosciences
Ceres Nanosciences is a privately held company, located in Northern Virginia, focused on incorporating its novel Nanotrap® particle technology into a range of diagnostic products and workflows. The Nanotrap® particle technology can improve diagnostic testing by capturing, concentrating, and preserving low abundance analytes from biological samples. The Nanotrap® particle technology was developed with support from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation,Schmidt Futures, the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA), and the Commonwealth of Virginia.
According to Dr. Shor, this “urine-based antigentest,” based on the OspA protein, is 100% sensitive for acute cases with EM rash(24/24 patients with EM rash tested positive). Please remember that while appearing successful for acute Lyme, this is a small study group. Also, having the EM rash is DIAGNOSTIC for Lyme – i.e. no testing even required.
It is far less effective for those who are chronically infected. It was positive for 42% out of 100 chronically ill patients.
I believe I heard Dr. Klinghardt recommend rolfing (deep tissue massage) before taking this test to force the organisms out in the blood where they can be excreted and picked up on this urine test.
Diagnosing people early is critical as doctors, despite knowing this complex illness can become very severe and more difficult to treat if left untreated, continue to take a ‘wait and see’ approach. They continue to rely upon faulty testing that misses anywhere from 70-86% of cases, and often wait for test results before treating – dooming thousands of patients to a life-time of suffering. This test will hopefully help these early cases; however, it will not be as effective for the chronically infected – nor help with those who are coinfected.
Diagnosing tick-borne illness has always been a clinical diagnosis.
Time for doctors to become educated instead of lazily relying upon faulty testing.
Novel Rickettsia Species Infecting Dogs, United States
James M. Wilson, Edward B. Breitschwerdt, Nicholas B. Juhasz, Henry S. Marr, Joao Felipe de Brito Galvão, Carmela L. Pratt, and Barbara A. Qurollo
Abstract
In 2018 and 2019, spotted fever was suspected in 3 dogs in 3 US states. The dogs had fever and hematological abnormalities; blood samples were Rickettsia seroreactive. Identical Rickettsia DNA sequences were amplified from the samples. Multilocus phylogenetic analysis showed the dogs were infected with a novel Rickettsia species related to human Rickettsia pathogens.
____________________
Important quote from study:
The cases were geographically distributed among 4 states; the dogs resided in Illinois, Oklahoma, and Tennessee, but the dog from Illinois had traveled to a tick-infested area of Arkansas. The tick species were not identified, but ticks common to these states include Amblyomma americanum, Dermacentor variabilis, and Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato, all of which are known to transmit Rickettsia (3). Haemophysalis longicornis, an invasive tick species recently confirmed in the United States, including in Tennessee and Arkansas, should be considered a potential vector for Rickettsia spp. (9,10).
Based on serologic cross-reactivity, presence of ompA, and phylogenetic tree analysis, the new Rickettsia sp. is an SFG Rickettsia, phylogenetically related to human pathogenic R. heilongjiangensis and R. massiliae, with only 95% identity to each (11,12). Thus, we report a previously unknown and unique Rickettsia sp. with clinical significance for dogs and potentially humans.
Because this novel Rickettsia cross-reacts with R. rickettsia on IFA, it could be underdiagnosed and more geographically widespread. Studies aimed at identifying the tick vector, potential animal reservoirs, and prevalence are ongoing. These 3 canine rickettsioses cases underscore the value of dogs as sentinels for emerging tickborne pathogens (13,14)
Call it the divine rule of masks. You shall not utter a negative word about them. You shall never question their effectiveness, even when they’ve failed to work for six months. You shall never be caught without the idol on your face – even on the face of your two-year-old, for that matter. You shall worship the cloth until the bitter end.
It doesn’t take a scientist to see that masks don’t work. The experience of unprecedented universal mask-wearing for months – even in places that had few COVID cases to begin with but then skyrocketed after mask use – demonstrates that the idea of wearing a mask to block a respiratory virus is sheer lunacy. Yet one group of researchers tried to cherry-pick data from a selected counties to show that cases dropped after the mask mandate, without any regard for the fact that each wave only lasts for about 6-8 weeks in a given area before dissipating – regardless of what actions are taken by the local population. Then it comes back a few times until everyone has been exposed to the virus. (See link for article)
____________________
**Comment**
According to the article, the counties studied had already experienced viral peak before the mask mandate and were destined to drop without doing anything – as viruses always do, until the next potential wave.
Researchers were forced to withdraw their study due to increased rates of infection – because THE MASKS DIDN’T WORK.
The authors promise to publish an update but Horowitz points out the obvious – the fact there were multiple waves shows the natural trajectory of viruses – there’s no need for an update. Viruses will ‘burn through the population regardless of what we put on our faces.’ Truer words were never spoken.
Horowitz points to the military to prove this point as there is 100% compliance of:
double-layered masks at ALL times indoors and outdoors except while eating or sleeping
social distancing of 6 feet on an island where they were not allowed to leave campus
being denied access to things that could provide surface transmission
routinely washing hands
most instruction and exercises outdoors
sleeping in double-occupancy rooms with daily cleaning of sinks
sanitizing bathrooms after each use with bleach wipes
cleaning dining hall with bleach after each platoon had eaten
supervising all movement of recruits, implementing unidirectional flow – with designated entry and exit points to minimize contact
undergoing daily temperature and symptom screening
enforcing quarantine measures by the same 6 instructors
Yet, despite hundreds if not thousands of cadets living like the ‘boy in the bubble,’ none of this worked, just as it failed to work with Army recruits at Fort Benning:
Firstly, it was wrong to claim that this virus was novel.
Secondly, It was even more wrong to claim that the population would not already have some immunity against this virus.
Thirdly, it was the crowning of stupidity to claim that someone could have Covid-19 without any symptoms at all or even to pass the disease along without showing any symptoms whatsoever.
Telling quote:
It’s about control and idolatry. Except this form of idolatry requires more faith in cloth diapers than the men of cloth have in God.
Madison Area Lyme Support Group 