https://www.galaxydx.com/difference-between-bartonella-and-lyme-disease/

Bartonella vs. Borrelia: Key Differences You Should Know

https://academic.oup.com/jme/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jme/tjz191/5607361

Minimal Duration of Tick Attachment Sufficient for Transmission of Infectious Rickettsia rickettsii (Rickettsiales: Rickettsiaceae) by Its Primary Vector Dermacentor variabilis(Acari: Ixodidae): Duration of Rickettsial Reactivation in the Vector Revisited

Journal of Medical Entomology, tjz191, https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjz191
Published:
05 November 2019

Abstract

It has been reported that starving ticks do not transmit spotted fever group Rickettsia immediately upon attachment because pathogenic bacteria exist in a dormant, uninfectious state and require time for ‘reactivation’ before transmission to a susceptible host. To clarify the length of reactivation period, we exposed guinea pigs to bites of Rickettsia rickettsii-infected Dermacentor variabilis (Say) and allowed ticks to remain attached for predetermined time periods from 0 to 48 h. Following removal of attached ticks, salivary glands were immediately tested by PCR, while guinea pigs were observed for 10–12 d post-exposure. Guinea pigs in a control group were subcutaneously inoculated with salivary glands from unfed D. variabilis from the same cohort. In a parallel experiment, skin at the location of tick bite was also excised at the time of tick removal to ascertain dissemination of pathogen from the inoculation site. Animals in every exposure group developed clinical and pathological signs of infection. The severity of rickettsial infection in animals increased with the length of tick attachment, but even attachments for less than 8 h resulted in clinically identifiable infection in some guinea pigs. Guinea pigs inoculated with salivary glands from unfed ticks also became severely ill.Results of our study indicate that R. rickettsii residing in salivary glands of unfed questing ticks does not necessarily require a period of reactivation to precede the salivary transmission and ticks can transmit infectious Rickettsia virtually as soon as they attach to the host.

________________

**Comment**

For far too long authorities have told us that there’s something called a “grace period,” in which ticks supposedly delay transmitting pathogens to us and that a period of 24-48 hours is required before we can become infected.

There is only one study which they base that information upon, and there’s never been a study on the minimum time for transmission.

This study blows the “grace period” theory out of the water and proves what we all know to happen in reality. People can become infected in mere hours upon attachment. It also proves another point as well: that some ticks have the pathogens already in their salivary glands making transmission times even shorter.

How many have been sent home with a false sense of security after a doctor, going by information authorities have proliferated, told them they can’t be infected because the tick wasn’t attached for a long enough period of time?  Thousands?
Please spread the word. There shouldn’t be any more patients falling through the cracks.

For more on transmission times:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/04/14/transmission-time-for-lymemsids-infection/

Microbiologist Holly Ahern on what’s currently wrong with diagnostics and treatment:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/12/06/ahern-flawed-lyme-policies-diagnostics-and-treatment/

0-11

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6812694/

Published online 2019 Aug 21. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5456
PMCID: PMC6812694
PMID: 31656708

Isolated Axillary Lymphadenitis Due to Bartonella Infection in an Immunocompromised Patient

Monitoring Editor: Alexander Muacevic and John R Adler

Abstract

Bartonella henselae is a relatively uncommon pathogen that can present as a serious disease in immunocompromised patients. We present a case of a 76-year-old man with stable chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who presented to the emergency department (ED) with an onset of right axillary lymphadenitis after recovering from a recent cat bite on the ipsilateral finger. Doppler ultrasound demonstrated an irregular, circumscribed 5cm x 4cm, hypoechoic mass with mild vascular flow consistent with an enlarged abnormal lymph node. The patient was diagnosed with cat scratch disease and discharged on oral antibiotics with spontaneous drainage of the purulent materials in subsequent outpatient oncology visits. This case highlights the classic presentation of this rare disease in an immunocompromised patient with feline contact. Early antibiotics should be considered for at-risk and immunocompromised patients due to low sensitivity and specificity for Bartonella serologic tests. CLL can also present with similar progressive lymphadenopathy with severe systemic symptoms and extranodal involvement that requires emergent oncologic interventions and diagnostic vigilance.

________________

**Comment**

Bartonella is NOT rare.

In this article, Dr. Mozayeni talks about Bartonella being one of the major co-infections of Lyme disease. It’s even more prevalent than Lyme, as there are many more ways to contract the disease (eg. flees, cats). In a study, that Dr. Breitschwerdt and Mozayeni published in The Journal of Emerging Diseases, about 60% of Lyme patients tested positive for Bartonella:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2016/01/03/bartonella-treatment/  If you want to know the likelihood of infection, please see the checklist within the article. Print it out and check how many symptoms you have. Take this with you to your doctor appointment and discuss the likelihood.

I’m glad this research article points out that testing is poor. This is true of each and every test for tick borne illness. This requires an educated and experienced practitioner to discover what patients are infected with.  If you have tick borne illness, save your time and money and get to an ILADS trained doctor.

In my experience, I’ve found Bartonella to be harder to deal with than Lyme disease.

 

http://outbreaknewstoday.com/lyme-disease-the-major-players-the-disagreements-and-the-idsa-draft-guidelines

Lyme disease: The major players, the disagreements and the IDSA draft guidelines

August 29, 2019
Lyme disease. So much we seem not to know, in many different areas.

Draft guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of Lyme disease were recently issued by the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA)–two really big, contentious issues.

And of course there are the disagreements of how the various organizations view these Lyme topics–I’ve often termed this the establishment vs. the advocates.

My guest today took a look at this in a recent two-part series in Forbes entitled “Lyme Wars”.

Joining me is the author and infectious disease physician, Judy Stone, MD.

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

___________________

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/08/04/the-lyme-wars-major-organizations-arent-playing-nicely-together/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/08/07/the-lyme-wars-part-2-which-way-should-we-treat/  I disagree with the author on numerous points and present them in this link.

Dr. Masters fought to get Lyme recognized in the South. It took decades for it to happen yet patients are still denied testing and treatment:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/10/06/remembering-dr-masters-the-rebel-for-lyme-patients-who-took-on-the-cdc-single-handedly/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/04/22/its-just-crazy-why-is-lyme-disease-treatment-so-difficult-to-find-in-mississippi/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2016/09/24/arkansas-kids-denied-lyme-treatment/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/10/24/no-lyme-in-oklahoma-yeah-right/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/05/31/no-lyme-in-the-south-guess-again/

We need more researchers and doctors who are willing to go against ancient dogma which has ruled Lyme-land for 40 years.
How many more have to suffer and die before Lyme/MSIDS is finally recognized as the true pandemic it is?