Approx. 1 Hour 15 Min.

Morgellons NOT Associated With Fungus

May 17, 2020

Interview with microbiologist Marianne Middleveen.

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/02/24/classification-staging-of-morgellons-disease-lessons-from-syphilis/

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/redfield-and-birx-can-they-be-trusted-with-covid/?

MAY 05, 2020

Redfield and Birx: Can they be trusted with COVID?

By Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Chairman, Children’s Health Defense

U.S. military documents show that, in 1992, the CDC’s current Director Robert Redfield and his then-assistant, Deborah Birx—both Army medical officers—knowingly falsified scientific data published in the New England Journal of Medicine fraudulently claiming that an HIV vaccine they helped develop was effective. They knew the vaccine was worthless.

Redfield now runs the agency charged with mandating COVID vaccines. Birx, a life-long protégé to both Redfield and Anthony Fauci, served on the board of Bill Gates’ Global Fund. Redfield, Birx and Fauci lead the White House coronavirus task force.

A subsequent Air Force tribunal on Scientific Fraud and Misconduct agreed that Redfield’s misleading or, possibly, deceptive information seriously threatens his credibility as a researcher …

 

In 1992, two military investigators charged Redfield and Birx with engaging in “a systematic pattern of data manipulation, inappropriate statistical analyses and misleading data presentation in an apparent attempt to promote the usefulness of the GP160 AIDS vaccine.” A subsequent Air Force tribunal on Scientific Fraud and Misconduct agreed that Redfield’s “misleading or, possibly, deceptive” information “seriously threatens his credibility as a researcher and has the potential to negatively impact AIDS research funding for military institutions as a whole. His allegedly unethical behavior creates false hope and could result in premature deployment of the vaccine.”

The tribunal recommended investigation by a “fully independent outside investigative body.” Dr. Redfield confessed to D.O.D. interrogators and to the tribunal, that his analyses were faulty and deceptive. He agreed to publicly correct them. Afterward, he continued making his false claims at three subsequent international HIV conferences, and perjured himself in testimony before Congress, swearing that his vaccine cured HIV.

Their gambit worked. Based upon his testimony, Congress appropriated $20 million to the military to support Redfield and Birx’s research project. Public Citizen complained in a 1994 letter to the Congressional Committee’s Henry Waxman that the money caused the Army to kill the investigation and “whitewash” Redfield’s crimes. The fraud propelled Birx and Redfield into stellar careers as health officials.

CHD Note: Documents obtained via Tom Paine.

© [May 5, 2020] Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

________________

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/04/10/dod-leak-birx-cdc-director-investigated-for-scientific-fraud-misconduct/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/12/shedding-light-on-the-dishonorable-record-of-dr-fauci-a-real-mengele/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/08/time-to-fire-dr-fauci-and-dr-tam/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/21/how-could-the-cdc-make-that-mistake/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/20/cdc-crimes-possible-sherman-provisions-clayton-acts-violated/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/04/02/coronavirus-if-they-lied-then-why-wouldnt-they-lie-now/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/04/03/cdc-centers-for-damaged-credibility/

 

https://globallymealliance.org/what-a-difference-a-year-makes/

by Jennifer Crystal

When I was little, my grandmother used to sing the Dinah Washington song, “What a difference a day makes, twenty-four little hours…” Later, memories of her singing those lyrics carried me through some of my toughest days of tick-borne illness. They remind me even today that I just need to get through the next hour, the next minute, because things could be better tomorrow.

Sometimes they were better. A Herxheimer reaction might settle, a solid night’s sleep might lower my emotional temperature, or my actual fever might go down. And sometimes, the tomorrows weren’t much better. When I first started intravenous antibiotics, I felt horrible for six weeks before noticing any improvement. Often the next day was worse than the last. I learned that while I could coach myself to survive each minute or second, I had to wait longer to really live again and even longer to thrive, which was my desire. For that type of progress, it was better to chart my improvement over months, if not years. Check here for an overview of some of my long-term recovery strategies.

Birthdays are always a nice time to reflect on the year passed, and this has been especially true since I’ve been sick with chronic Lyme, two tick-borne co-infections—babesia, ehrlichia—and Epstein-Barr virus. A lot can happen in a year, both good and bad. We never know what joys or sorrows await us. Lyme patients don’t know how they’ll respond to treatment or how long it will take them to feel better. For many, though, they can see real progress—with dips and valleys—over a year or more.

I was thinking back to my 29th birthday recently, when I was in the midst of a relapse. Sick and exhausted, I wondered if I could endure further treatment. I struggled with my self-esteem. Frankly, there didn’t seem to be much to celebrate.

But flash forward a year to my 30th birthday party. I worea pretty pink dress. I was surrounded by friends and family. I was smiling, my cheeks glowing, with much to celebrate: a return to remission, to independent living and the resumption of freelance work. However, improvement over that year was by no means linear. I had many bad days, sometimes weeks. But when I considered the headway I made between my 29th and 30th birthdays, all I could think was, “What a difference a year makes.”

When I blew out the candles that year, I wished for continued health, for my life to keep blossoming—and it did. A couple years later, I moved to Boston and started graduate school. In the decade since, I’ve written two books and forged a teaching career. I have gotten back on my skis. I have also wrestled brief flare-ups of my illnesses, grieved the death of loved ones and mourned the loss of love. Those have been my low points, but when I see how many gains I’ve made over the last decade—and how much my stamina has improved—I want to pinch myself. I can hardly believe it.

As I blew out my candles last year, I never could have imagined the world would be in the midst of a global pandemic by my next birthday. But I also couldn’t have imagined all of the good things that have happened to me this year, including landing a literary agent, surviving COVID-19 despite my underlying health conditions. And thus, I hold onto hope—for me, for you, for the Lyme community, for our world.

When I blow out my birthday candles this week I’ll wish for a healthier year for all of us. I hope that by this time next year, I’ll be able to celebrate that wish coming true.


jennifer crystal_2

Opinions expressed by contributors are their own.

Jennifer Crystal is a writer and educator in Boston. Her memoir about her medical journey is forthcoming. Contact her at lymewarriorjennifercrystal@gmail.com.

 

 

Well, that made my day!  I love to see patients improve. If you are having a rough day, month, or year – hang tight.  It will get better in time.  

https://waow.com/2020/04/30/more-ticks-risk-of-lyme-disease-in-wisconsin/ (News Video Here)

More ticks, risk of Lyme disease in Wisconsin

WAUSAU, Wis. (WAOW) — A mild winter combined with a larger population of deer in Wisconsin this year could mean more ticks to look out for.

Experts at the Tick-Borne Illness Center of Excellence in Woodruff treat people from across the country, but they say Northern Wisconsin stands out.

“It is a highly prevalent area for wood tick diseases and deer tick diseases,” said center manager Kathy McCaughan.

This year, experts say they’re seeing the impact of a mild winter.

“The ticks really don’t go away in the winter they just go underneath the leaves and the snow kind of insulates them and the first tick that we had reported here was the beginning of March already,” said Clinic Program Director Connie Campbell.

Combine that with a higher deer population and more people outside, there could be a higher risk of spreading lyme disease.

“Now with COVID, everyone is out and about a little bit trying to get fresh air, just kinda be vigilant,” said Campbell. “You wear light-colored clothing so that you can spot them really easily, deet helps but you don’t spray it on your skin you spray it on your clothes.”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention also says to tuck your pants into your socks when you’re going out and perform a tick check when you get back home.

You can learn more about Lyme disease on the State’s Health Department Website.

You can also download an app from UW-Madison to track ticks and learn about removal/prevention.

__________________

**Comment**

We really have no idea why there are more ticks. Blaming the weather isn’t prudent considering ticks are ecoadaptive and survive about anything but fire. Research shows it’s migrating birds and photoperiod (light required for ticks to molt) that propagates ticks and the diseases they carry: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/11/07/ticks-on-the-move-due-to-migrating-birds-and-photoperiod-not-climate-change/ (research conducted by an independent researcher)

But this doesn’t fit the climate change narrative that keeps being pushed upon us. Right now, climate change is a popular topic so if researchers want grant money they put that moniker in their work so they obtain money.  Even if it’s untrue.

Please see:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/06/17/ontario-public-health-officials-called-out-on-shoddy-biased-research-utilizing-an-erroneous-climate-change-model-to-program-a-futuristic-tick-problem/

This is just another example of how finances dictate the science being done.  Sad but true.

“For blacklegged ticks, climate change is an apocryphal issue.” -John Scott

https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2020/05/cdc-and-states-are-misreporting-covid-19-test-data-pennsylvania-georgia-texas/

GETTY / THE ATLANTIC
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is conflating the results of two different types of coronavirus tests, distorting several important metrics and providing the country with an inaccurate picture of the state of the pandemic.We’ve learned that the CDC is making, at best, a debilitating mistake: combining test results that diagnose current coronavirus infections with test results that measure whether someone has ever had the virus.The upshot is that the government’s disease-fighting agency is overstating the country’s ability to test people who are sick with COVID-19. The agency confirmed to The Atlantic on Wednesday that it is mixing the results of viral and antibody tests, even though the two tests reveal different information and are used for different reasons. (See link for article)
___________________
**Comment**
Important quote:

This is not merely a technical error. States have set quantitative guidelines for reopening their economies based on these flawed data points.

And there you have it for anyone who still cares.  

The important take-away from this article is that the CDC is up to its usual bag of tricks.  It just changed language on its website from stating that only viral tests are used in its figures to omitting all reference to the type of tests being used, but states:

“These data are compiled from a number of sources,” the new version read. The text strongly implied that both types of tests were included in the count, but did not explicitly say so.

The CDC loves to change parameters for its own purposes. 

The article then goes on to show the reason for this change in language. The data had become more favorable showing about 1.5 million positive test results.  After the CDC language change, the positive rate plummeted to 52,429. 

The language change also concerns Ashish Jha, the K. T. Li Professor of Global Health at Harvard and the director of the Harvard Global Health Institute, because antibody tests typically have a lower percent-positive rate than viral tests. Blending the two types of tests will dramatically drive the positive rate down – it also makes them both “uninterpretable.”

Why would the CDC purposely want to drive the positive rate down?

Could it be to propel the “viral mania” and fear seen in everyone’s eyes?  Could it be used to support the continuing draconian measures and the push for an unsafe vaccine which is riddled with problems but can track everyone’s movements?

The article also states that places where the rate of new infections aren’t falling are among the states blending the two types of testing.
Keep that fact in mind when you look at the maps reporting case counts.

But wait!  The fun doesn’t end. The CDC also quietly changed MORE wording on its website overnight.  It changed its fear-mongering about how the virus spreads to admitting that it doesn’t appear to spread easily from surfaces, objects, or animals.  https://bgr.com/2020/05/20/coronavirus-spread-cdc-says-transmission-from-surfaces-is-unlikely/

What’s sad is the damage is done and most will never hear this update.

A great explanation of the two tests is given in the first article as well as the comparison of viral testing that’s used to understand how many people are getting infected, vs. antibody testing which looks back at the overall picture.

But this is all assuming the tests are accurate in the first place, which they are not.

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/18/coronavirus-covid-19-antibody-tests-do-you-really-want-one-think-hard-about-it-maybe-not/

  • The most common COVID-19 test, the nasal swab test, has an accuracy rate as low as 70%.
  • Regarding antibody testing,  a report by more than 50 scientists found that only three out of 14 antibody tests gave consistently reliable results, andeven the best had flaws.
  • Accuracy data only become available in a database after the FDA connects real-work experiences, but after “approval” has already been given. In other words, you are the Guinea Pig providing the “real world data.” 
  • 95% of the data comes from manufacturers while only 5% come from doctors and patients.  See the problem?
  • WHO and CDC use PCR tests. False negatives can occur up to 30% of the time. Please see:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/07/was-the-covid-19-test-meant-to-detect-a-virus/  The creator of the PCR states it was NEVER meant to diagnose patients but was created for manufacturing and research purposes. See also:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/03/16/does-the-coronavirus-exist/ David Crowe explains the PCR test. Let’s just say there’s a lot of room for error.

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/20/cdc-crimes-possible-sherman-provisions-clayton-acts-violated/  Put an end to CDC/NIH corruption and write your authorities.