I’m a big believer in silver linings and in counting your blessings.  COVID, horrific as it was, unlocked many silver linings: it’s easier for people to work from home, many have discovered homeschooling isn’t so difficult after all, the rise of telehealth, many have now discovered that science has been hijacked and that it’s more important than ever to ‘believe but verify,’ and of course the plethora of life-changing information on home remedies such as chlorine dioxide and DMSO.  The following article is one such example.

https://onedaymd.substack.com/p/dmso-unlocking-pain-relief-healing?

DMSO: Unlocking Pain Relief, Healing, Cancer, and More (2025)

In This Article:

  1. Introduction
  2. What is DMSO
  3. DMSO and Cancer
  4. DMSO and Tissue Healing
  5. DMSO and Musculoskeletal Injuries
  6. DMSO and Sports Injuries
  7. DMSO’s Diverse Benefits (Summary)
  8. DMSO Dosage in Humans
  9. DMSO Side Effects and Safety
  10. Find DMSO Providers
  11. Conclusion

Introduction

In 2022, Erica Eyres, a vigorous fifty-six-year-old aerobics instructor who had struggled to breathe, was given “absolutely devastating” news: She might need a lung transplant. She had never smoked, ran cross-country track in high school, and was a personal trainer for years, but, by 2024, a transplant assessment was arranged. (1)

“I decided that I will make that decision,” she said, “only if it’s the last resort, and I’m on my deathbed.”

A few months before her consultation, however, Eyres, then fifty-eight, made an appointment with a new primary care doctor for routine prescription refills. She was about to be introduced, literally and figuratively, to a new kind of medicine. It would change everything.

Dr. James Miller, a former surgeon, liked to get to know his patients, so he asked Eyres for her history. She told him of her diagnosis, thirty years prior, with a serious but manageable case of scleroderma. In 2020, however, this auto-immune disorder, which can affect skin and organs, showed exactly what it could do.

Exhausted and tethered to an oxygen tank, Eyres spent months on her couch. She took medications that had awful side effects. Her lungs were “loaded with ground glass opacities in the lower lobes,” she said, which CT scans confirm. Eyres was diagnosed in 2021 with interstitial lung disease and pulmonary arterial hypertension. Her work in physical fitness was over.

When Eyres finished her history, she got two surprises. Miller agreed it was likely that the covid shots had made her condition, he later told me, “massively worse.” He then listened to her lungs to see how bad they sounded. “Don’t rush that,” he said of the transplant, a sure sign of a doctor who believed in other options.

Eyres was ecstatic. Miller, she said, was the “first doctor that actually hears me.” Miller then offered Eyres help in the form of three easy-to-find supplements for her vaccine injury: nattokinase, bromelain, and turmeric. She soon felt better.

It was on her second visit, a month later, that Miller suggested Eyres smear a gel supplement over her chest and lung area called DMSO to help her condition. This time, Eyres “kinda gave the eye roll,” she told me.

She was in for the biggest surprise yet.

Erica’s Turning Point

In December 2023, seven months before she saw Dr. Miller, Eyres’ second CT scan results were again ominous. They read in part, “Re-demonstrated diffuse centrilobular ground glass nodularity in the lungs, slightly more pronounced in the lower lobes … Expiratory images demonstrate air trapping throughout both lungs.” (Ground glass nodules, common in late-stage covid, are abnormal spots on the lungs. Air trapping is the inability to fully exhale, leading to shortness of breath.)

The diagnosis was given as interstitial lung disease or ILD.

In November 2024, Eyres went for another CT scan in preparation for a lung transplant consultation. She had been using DMSO for five months at that point, mostly topically and in the previous month, orally. The scan found, “No evidence of interstitial lung disease. No air-trapping.”

The subsequent transplant consultation was swift: The pulmonologist looked at her CT results and told her she was stable, she said. “Nothing more we need to do,” he said.

“We head over to the transplant center and the doctor comes in and sits down and tells me, ‘You do not have ILD, your lungs on CT scan are clear!!!!’” Eyres wrote in an email to me.

“Nobody can understand or explain this,” she wrote. “All I can say is, where did the ground glass go? It was there and now it’s not. DMSO.”

She had made her appointment with Miller only because her standing primary care doctor was not available. “BEST thing I ever did!!!!” she wrote. (1)  (See link for article)

_______________

**Comment**

‘Must read’ article.  It exemplifies how DMSO can do so many things and no Lyme/MSIDS patient should be without it.

Readers of this website know about DMSO, how it works, and the many things it helps, but I love the testimonials of successful usage as well as the list of DMSO doctors.

For more:

https://prod.cdn.everyaction.com

Environmental Health Trust is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization.

We depend on generous donations from our community.  

Join Our Newsletter | Healthy Tech at Home Project | Wildlife and Wireless

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/new-study-high-wireless-emf-exposure?

NEW STUDY: High Wireless EMF Exposure More Than Triples Risk of Neurodevelopmental Delays in Infants

First-ever infant cohort study using direct home RF-EMF measurements finds major increases in motor, problem-solving, and social deficits — even at everyday Wi-Fi and cell tower levels.

A major new study titled, Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Field Emissions and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Infants: A Prospective Cohort Study, has delivered one of the clearest warnings yet about the effects of everyday wireless radiation on babies.

Unlike past research based on phone-use surveys, this team directly measured radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) inside homes — from sources like cell towers, Wi-Fi routers, cordless phones, and Bluetooth devices — and tracked real brain and motor development in infants over their first year.

The result? Higher in-home radiation was strongly linked to delays in fine motor skills, problem-solving ability, and social development — even after accounting for birth weight, maternal age, and income level.

What They Measured

Scientists went into homes with a professional spectrum analyzer, measuring total RF-EMF from all sources in the living environment — not just cell towers.

This included:

  • Wi-Fi routers (often running 24/7)

  • Cordless phones and their base stations

  • Bluetooth devices like speakers, earbuds, and baby monitors

  • Nearby cell towers

  • Smart TVs, tablets, and smart home hubs

(See link for article & video)

_______________

**Comment**

The study showed that everyday wireless radiation in the home at levels most would consider ‘normal’ may harm brain development with babies as they faced nearly 2-4 times the odds of developmental delays.

For more:

https://danielcameronmd.com/lymeseek-lyme-blood-test/

New Lyme Blood Test Outperforms Standard Testing

Lyme Science Blog

Aug26

New Lyme Blood Test LymeSeek Promises Earlier, More Accurate Diagnosis

Lyme disease is one of the few infections where patients are often diagnosed too late — not because they waited, but because testing could not detect the infection until later stages – if at all.

A new Lyme blood test called LymeSeek could change that. It aims to revolutionize Lyme diagnostics by delivering significantly higher accuracy, especially in early disease detection — where current tests often fall short.

Holly Ahern, MS, MT, Chief Scientific Officer at Aces Diagnostics, discusses LymeSeek. For more information, visit https://www.acesdiagnostics.com/lymeseek

According to data presented at the 2025 Association for Diagnostics and Laboratory Medicine meeting, LymeSeek demonstrated over 90% sensitivity and specificity in detecting Lyme disease across all phases of illness — from early localized to post-treatment.

That’s a significant improvement over standard two-tier testing, which often misses early cases when treatment matters most. Reliable testing is particularly important since an estimated 30% of patients never develop the classic bull’s-eye rash, which most practitioners rely on for diagnosing the disease.


Why Current Lyme Testing Often Fails

Current Lyme disease tests miss many infections — especially early ones — mainly because of how they work and what they’re looking for.

They don’t detect the bacteria itself

  • Most current tests (like the CDC-recommended two-tier testing) look for antibodies your immune system makes against Borrelia burgdorferi. However, it can take several days to weeks for antibodies to develop. That means serologic testing can produce false negatives — especially in the first 2–4 weeks after infection. This is one of the biggest frustrations for providers treating patients in Lyme endemic areas. Many patients never test positive

The CDC’s recommended two-tier system is rigid and outdated

  • Patients are initially given an ELISA test. If positive or equivocal, they then receive the Western blot. If either of these test results are negative, the patient supposedly doesn’t have Lyme disease – even when they might.

  • This system was designed decades ago mainly for surveillance, not for highly sensitive early diagnosis.

Borrelia’s biology makes testing tricky

  • The bacteria changes the proteins it expresses at different stages of infection, meaning antibody targets aren’t consistent.

  • It can hide in tissues and reduce exposure to the immune system (immune evasion), which delays or blunts antibody production.

Strain and species variation

  • U.S. tests focus mainly on B. burgdorferi sensu stricto. If someone is infected with another species like: B. mayonii, B. garinii, or B. afzelii, testing may not detect those antigens, leading to a false negative result.

Past infection vs. active infection confusion

  • Once antibodies form, they can persist for months to years after treatment. Therefore, testing cannot distinguish whether an infection is new, ongoing, or old. A patient may have an old infection that has resolved and doesn’t require treatment.

What Makes This New Lyme Blood Test Different?

The new Lyme blood test uses a multiplexed antigen assay—testing for 10 different immune responses at once. Then, a machine learning algorithm interprets the results. This approach improves both sensitivity and specificity, especially in early disease when antibodies are still forming.

In head-to-head comparison:

  1. In early disease (0–72 hours after EM rash), LymeSeek detected 100% of cases vs. just 37% with standard testing.

  2. In post-treatment Lyme (6+ months after infection), LymeSeek identified 97% of cases vs. 46% with standard tests.

That means better detection without waiting for seroconversion, and better confirmation of past infection when patients present with persistent symptoms.


Will This Test Change Lyme Disease Care?

It could—eventually.

This new Lyme blood test may help:

  1. Identify early Lyme before antibodies form

  2. Confirm cases when no rash is present

  3. Support diagnosis in patients with ongoing symptoms after treatment


Is the New Lyme Blood Test Available Now?

🚫 It is not yet FDA-approved or available for patient ordering through clinics or commercial labs.

ACES Diagnostics is currently working with the FDA on clinical trial pathways. The test has received a De Novo classification, meaning it’s being evaluated as a novel diagnostic tool—not just compared to current testing.

If approved, LymeSeek could be a game-changer for early Lyme detection and for patients with post-treatment symptoms who need better answers.


Final Thoughts

A new test can’t fix every challenge that comes with Lyme disease. But it could mean getting answers sooner, missing fewer cases, and giving doctors more confidence in diagnosing.


Links

  1. Clinical Testing and Diagnosis for Lyme Disease

  2. LymeSeek: Blood test with 90% accuracy

  3. Why I Treat Babesia Even if the Tests Are Negative

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/bulletin-fourteenyear-fugitive-from?

BULLETIN: Fourteen‑Year Fugitive from Justice Poul Thorsen Arrested in Germany for Defrauding the US Government: What This Means for the Vaccine/Autism Question

Resources. As always, we present the facts without speculation. Background and facts you can use.

Poul Thorsen, a Danish physician and researcher prominently involved in vaccine‑autism epidemiology, was indicted in 2011 in the U.S. for allegedly misappropriating more than $1 million in CDC grant funds. For over a decade he was a fugitive who face, name and charges were openly displayed on the US OIG Most wanted. Breitbart News has reported Thorsen was arrested in June under INTERPOL red notice.

This POPULAR RATIONALISM BULLETIN article reconstructs Thorsen’s academic contributions, the criticisms of his methodological work, the legal findings, and the implications for public policy and scientific trust. It places legal culpability in the context of scientific reliability/implications for other Danish studies, identifies where those studies he co‑authored have been called out for design weaknesses or uncorrected biases, and outlines what must be done to restore clarity.  (See link for timeline and article)

For More:

The following study never underwent peer review and was never published, because the authors — staunch vaccine supporters — told ICAN attorney Aaron Siri they were concerned about losing their jobs or reputations because their findings contradicted the official public health narrative and vaccine policy.  Lois Lamerato, Ph.D., who had worked on the study told Siri she and her coauthor both thought the study was well done and worthy of publication.  But the “higher-ups” at Henry Ford Health, to whom she was required to send a copy before submission, did not want to submit it. Lamerato also said she was worried the study, if published, would make doctors feel uncomfortable.

Go here for a 2 min video summing it all up.

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-henry-ford-vaxxed-vs-unvaxxed?

BREAKING: Henry Ford Vaxxed vs. Unvaxxed Study Found Vaccinated Kids Had 453% More Neurodevelopmental Disorders — 57% Rendered Chronically Ill

The largest vaccinated vs. unvaccinated birth cohort study in U.S. history (n=18,468) tracked children for 10 years — and revealed staggering increases in chronic disease among the vaccinated.

Today, attorney Aaron Siri testified before the U.S. Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations during the hearing titled:

“How the Corruption of Science has Impacted Public Perception and Policies Regarding Vaccines.”

In his sworn testimony, Siri revealed the results of a long-hidden study from the Henry Ford Health System in Detroit, MI.

This is the largest vaccinated vs. unvaccinated birth cohort study ever conducted in the United States (n=18,468). Children were tracked from birth over a 10-year period. The data were drawn directly from electronic medical records — the gold standard for real-world health outcomes.

The study’s official title: “Impact of Childhood Vaccination on Short- and Long-Term Chronic Health Outcomes in Children: A Birth Cohort Study.”

The measures and outcomes cited below come directly from the testimony of Aaron Siri, who presented these findings under oath in the U.S. Senate. Unfortunately, the study is not yet publicly available. (See link for video and key findings)

______________

KEY FINDINGS

Compared to unvaccinated children, those who received one or more vaccines had dramatically higher rates of chronic illness:

  • 329% more asthma
  • 203% more atopic disease
  • 496% more autoimmune disease
  • 453% more neurodevelopmental disorders
    • including 228% more developmental delays
    • and 347% more speech disorders
Siri testified that all of these findings were statistically significant.

Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) and Del Bigtree have dedicated an entire documentary film to it, aptly titled “An Inconvenient Study,” to be released October 3, 2025.

On X, President Trump posted an old video of renowned geneticist and the Director of genetics at Maryland Medical Library, Dr. Mark Geier, about how POISONOUS Thimerosal in vaccines is.

The video captions:

“They’re ALL poison. Every. Single. One.”

This comes JUST before RDK Jr is set to release his autism report, and the newly dropped evidence that proves Fauci ordered staff to delete emails after reading them.
Finally, the FDA is conducting an ‘Intense Investigation’ of Child deaths following the COVID clot shot.

http://  Approx. 12 Min

Vaccinated People At Risk For Chronic Illness

Sept. 8, 2025

The Economic Times

For more: