https://iladef.org/herbs-for-bartonella-and-babesia/?

The International Lyme and Associated Diseases Society (ILADS) is a nonprofit, international, multidisciplinary medical society dedicated to the diagnosis and treatment of Lyme and other complex inflammatory diseases. With these educational blog posts from experts and members of our board, ILADS aims to promote awareness and understanding of health and wellness, especially as it relates to complex inflammatory diseases, so that we can all learn and grow together. If you have any questions or want more information, you can email us at contact@ilads.org. 

Disclaimer: Every patient is an individual with unique characteristics. This blog article is not medical advice. It does not constitute a physician-patient relationship. It is for educational purposes only. Do not try out what is in this article without medical advice, working with your licensed physician and licensed healthcare providers

For people grappling with chronic Lyme disease, Bartonella and Babesia are increasingly in the spotlight. These stealthy microbes are often linked to some of the most debilitating symptoms, yet there’s a puzzling twist: they rarely cause severe acute illness in otherwise healthy individuals. This paradox may hold the key to understanding why traditional antibiotics often fall short—and why herbs, with their complex and synergistic properties, might offer a more promising path to lasting relief.

Babesia

Babesia is a protozoan. It shares characteristics with Plasmodium, the protozoa that cause malaria, but its potential to make people acutely ill is much lower. Instead of mosquitoes, it’s spread primarily by ticks. The most common species of Babesia are Babesia microti, Babesia divergins, and Babesia duncani, but about a dozen species have been associated with human illness.

Like Plasmodium, Babesia invades erythrocytes (red blood cells). Symptoms associated with an acute infection of Babesia, however, tend to be mild and may not appear at all: About 1 in 4 cases are asymptomatic. Symptomatic cases in immunocompetent (healthy) individuals generally resolve without treatment. Significant acute illness is mostly isolated to immunocompromised individuals and those lacking a spleen. Because most cases resolve without treatment, only about 2,000 cases are reported in the U.S. each year.

Bartonella

Bartonella is a slow-growing, gram-negative bacterium. The most common species include Bartonella quintana (trench fever) and Bartonella henselae (cat scratch fever), but a variety of Bartonella species infect humans; in fact, every mammalian species on earth (including whales!) harbors some species of Bartonella. Bartonella is spread primarily by insect and other arthropod vectors, including fleas, lice, and ticks.

Bartonella is a facultative intracellular bacterium, meaning it can live either inside or outside cells. It has a preference for invading endothelial cells lining small blood vessels. Like a tiger waiting for prey, this places the bacteria at an ideal location to invade and scavenge nutrients from erythrocytes.

As with Babesia, symptoms of acute infection with Bartonella are generally mild, and asymptomatic infections are not uncommon. Most infections in immunocompetent individuals resolve without treatment and go unreported.

A Balanced Relationship is a Natural State

Their main survival strategy is persistence, not aggression. (This is true of Borrelia and all the Lyme coinfections as well). Overwhelming a host with infection doesn’t work in the microbes’ favor. An equilibrium in which the host isn’t severely affected but the microbes can persist offers a stable environment for the microbes and — importantly — allows ongoing opportunities to spread to new hosts.

Of course, the host’s immune system would rather not have them there at all and makes every effort to root them out. The microbes, however, match that effort with sophisticated moves that allow them to persist. It’s a chess game that’s been going on between hosts and microbes for millions of years. In the end, a balanced host-microbe relationship is a natural outcome.

Mechanisms of Persistence

A key strategy used by all the Lyme microbes is invading and surviving inside cells. The internal environment of a living cell offers isolation from both the immune system and antibiotics. Different microbes invade different cells. Babesia and Bartonella have a preference for invading erythrocytes (red blood cells).

Another key strategy is the ability to slow their growth or even go dormant. Slowed growth or dormancy (quiescence) allows microbes to remain inside a cell without affecting the cell’s functions or alerting the immune system that the cell has been compromised.

Babesia parasites are cleared primarily by macrophages in the spleen (which is why not having a spleen is a big risk factor for severe acute illness). When red blood cells become swollen with parasites, the swollen red blood cells become trapped and then eliminated. By slowing their growth rate, red blood cells infected with parasites don’t swell, which allows infected red blood cells to pass through the spleen undetected.

Persistence of Babesia for greater than two years has been documented in asymptomatic individuals. Transmission of Babesia by blood transfusion is a leading risk to the blood supply in the United States, suggesting that individuals harboring Babesia asymptomatically are not uncommon.

The same strategy is used by Bartonella. It has been documented that the bacteria can achieve a slow enough growth rate to survive undetected for the lifespan of infected erythrocytes. In addition to lodging within erythrocytes, these bacteria may exist within lymphocytes and other cells in the body. Numerous studies have documented an asymptomatic carrier state for Bartonella in healthy individuals.

That isn’t to say that Babesia and Bartonella aren’t pathogens. They most certainly are. But they wait until they have the advantage. And they can wait — quietly residing inside cells — for a long time.

And it isn’t just Babesia and Bartonella. All the Lyme microbes use intracellular persistence as a strategy, though each microbe goes about it in a different way and has preference for different cell types. Together they form a silent reservoir of pathogens hiding out in blood and tissues — all waiting for an opportunity.

Reaching the Boiling Point

That opportunity comes if the host’s health is compromised. 

Sometimes it’s a sudden event — like a severe trauma or infection with a more virulent microbe, such as SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) — that tips the balance. But more often it’s multiple factors adding up over time: years of eating a poor diet, inadequate sleep, chronic exposure to toxic substances, or a sedentary lifestyle. All of those factors may weaken cells.

Once infected cells are weakened by stress, the microbes are free to grow unchecked. Unchecked microbes destroy cells. The types of symptoms that result correspond to the types of cells that are damaged.

Destruction of erythrocytes by Babesia results in symptoms including anemia, headache, muscle and joint aches, air hunger, an enlarged spleen and liver, brain fog, jaundice, bruising, petechiae, and dark urine.

Invasion of endothelial cells (cells that line blood vessels) by Bartonella bacteria can cause constriction of blood flow, which can result in symptoms including bone pain, pain in the soles of feet, endocarditis, and liver or spleen enlargement. Damage to red blood cells can result in anemia. Entry into the central nervous system can cause a range of neurological symptoms.

Babesia and Bartonella, of course, don’t account for all the symptoms that occur with chronic Lyme disease. Compromised host status allows the unchecked growth of not only Babesia and Bartonella but also Borrelia and any other pathogens that might be lurking in the host’s blood and tissues. Because different microbes invade and damage different cells in the body, a wide range of symptoms is possible.

It’s like a pot boiling over on the stove. Increased microbial activity compounds stress on the host, which unleashes greater microbe activity. It becomes a vicious cycle with cellular destruction caused by a frenzy of unleashed microbes throughout tissues.

Where Treatments Fall Short

Whereas, antibiotics might seem like the logical solution, antibiotics only kill active microbes, but have minimal impact on the total reservoir of slow-growing or dormant intracellular microbes in tissues. As soon as the antibiotics are discontinued, new microbes emerge and the patient relapses.

What’s more, antibiotics don’t restore the body’s ability to contain the microbes. In fact, prolonged use of antibiotics further compromise this ability by:

  • Disrupting normal flora in the gut and skin, which are a key part of the body’s natural defenses
  • Generating antibiotic-resistant pathogens, which has become a major health hazard worldwide
  • Being toxic to cells and mitochondria in the body

Winning the battle requires long-term suppression of microbe activity — without causing further stress to the body. In other words, you have to counter the microbes with the same strategy they use — with persistence instead of aggression.

The best suited option to achieve that goal is herbal therapy.

The Herbal Advantage

Herbs are plants. Like all living organisms, plants must maintain defenses against invasive microorganisms. They accomplish that task with a sophisticated defense system made up of hundreds of chemical substances known as phytochemicals.

It’s not a random collection of chemicals, however. The plant phytochemical defense system functions somewhat like an immune system. It’s selective for a wide range of pathogenic bacteria, viruses, protozoa, fungi, and parasites — but doesn’t adversely affect normal flora.

This gives herbs a distinct advantage over synthetic antibiotics. The regular use of herbs actually balances the microbiome of the gut and skin, instead of disrupting it. Though well recognized, this phenomenon has been documented by science.

The advantages don’t stop there.

Antimicrobial resistance occurs most rapidly with the use of synthetic antibiotics. This creates antibiotic-resistant “superbugs.” In contrast, the same type of resistance doesn’t occur to herbs. In a world where antibiotic-resistant pathogens have become a major problem, herbs may be our best hope.

Instead of being toxic to cells (like antibiotics and many therapies), the phytochemical defense provided by herbs protects cells throughout the body from a wide range of stress factors by neutralizing free radicals, harmful radiation and toxic substances. This provides a high level of protection to cells.

Herbs are plants that humans have selectively consumed for hundreds or even thousands of years as both food and medicines. Not surprisingly, the most commonly used herbs have a very low potential for toxicity.

While all herbs provide broad-spectrum antimicrobial properties, some herbs are more potent than others — and many of these herbs have found their way to treatment of chronic Lyme disease.

People have been using herbal therapy to treat chronic Lyme disease with good results for over two decades. Their stories and accounts, posted on the internet and social media, provide strong support for herbal therapy as a viable option for overcoming chronic Lyme disease.

The popularity of herbs for Lyme disease caught the attention of researchers at Johns Hopkins University. In a study published in 2020, a dozen herbs commonly used for treatment of chronic Lyme disease were evaluated for activity against Borrelia burgdorferi. Of the twelve, seven herbal extracts were found to have greater activity against both motile and cyst (dormant) forms of the bacteria than commonly used antibiotics.

The list included

  • Cryptolepis sanguinolenta
  • Juglans nigra (Black walnut)
  • Polygonum cuspidatum (Japanese knotweed)
  • Artemisia annua (Sweet wormwood)
  • Uncaria tomentosa (Cat’s claw)
  • Cistus incanus
  • Scutellaria baicalensis (Chinese skullcap)

In the same year, two other studies were published using some of these same herbs against Babesia and Bartonella.  In one study published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, Cryptolepis sanguinolenta, Artemisia annua, Scutellaria baicalensis, Alchornea cordifolia, and Polygonum cuspidatum were found to have good in vitro inhibitory activity against Babesia duncani in the hamster erythrocyte model.

In a second study done at Cold Springs Harbor Laboratory, Cryptolepis sanguinolenta,  Juglans nigra, and Polygonum cuspidatum were able to eradicate all stationary phase Bartonella henselae cells within 7 days.

The fact that several of the herbs — Polygonum cuspidatum (Japanese knotweed), Scutellaria baicalensis (Chinese skullcap), and Cryptolepis sanguinolenta — had good activity against more than one of the microbes shows the wide range of activity found in herbs. When herbs with strong broad-spectrum antimicrobial properties are combined with immunomodulating and adaptogenic herbs and medicinal mushrooms, the results can be phenomenal.

Rebuilding the Body Back Better

The low potential for toxicity associated with these herbs allows you to do something that isn’t possible or practical with most chronic Lyme therapies — never let up. Herbal therapy can be continued until all symptoms are resolved, even if that takes years. Instead of being in a perpetual war, however, you can think of it as rebuilding your body from the ground up.

Learn more about Dr. Rawls’ approach to treating chronic illness with herbal therapy on RawlsMD.

References

An X, Bao Q, Di S, et al. The interaction between the gut Microbiota and herbal medicines. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;118:109252.

Akel T, Mobarakai N. Hematologic manifestations of babesiosis. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2017;16(1):6.

Bloch EM, Kumar S, Krause PJ. Persistence of Babesia microti Infection in Humans. Pathogens. 2019;8(3):102.

Bush JC, Robveille C, Maggi RG, Breitschwerdt EB. Neurobartonelloses: emerging from obscurity!. Parasit Vectors. 2024;17(1):416.

Cheslock MA, Embers ME. Human Bartonellosis: An Underappreciated Public Health Problem?. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2019;4(2):69.

Deng H, Pang Q, Zhao B, Vayssier-Taussat M. Molecular Mechanisms of Bartonella and Mammalian Erythrocyte Interactions: A Review. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2018;8:431.

Eicher SC, Dehio C. Bartonella entry mechanisms into mammalian host cells. Cell Microbiol. 2012;14(8):1166-1173.

Feng J et al. Evaluation of Natural and Botanical Medicines for Activity Against Growing and Non-growing Forms of B. burgdorferi. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Feb 21;7:6.

Goc A, Niedzwiecki A, Rath M. In vitro evaluation of antibacterial activity of phytochemicals and micronutrients against Borrelia burgdorferi and Borrelia garinii. J Appl Microbiol. 2015;119(6):1561-1572.

Goc A, Rath M. The anti-borreliae efficacy of phytochemicals and micronutrients: an update. Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2016;3(3-4):75-82.

Jalovecka M, Sojka D, Ascencio M, Schnittger L. Babesia Life Cycle – When Phylogeny Meets Biology. Trends Parasitol. 2019;35(5):356-368.

Jin X, Gou Y, Xin Y, et al. Advancements in understanding the molecular and immune mechanisms of Bartonella pathogenicity. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1196700.

Ma X, Leone J, Schweig S, Zhang Y. Botanical Medicines with Activity against Stationary Phase Bartonella henselae. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.

Scherler A, Jacquier N, Greub G. Chlamydiales, Anaplasma and Bartonella: persistence and immune escape of intracellular bacteria. Microbes Infect. 2018;20(7-8):416-423.

Vannier EG, Diuk-Wasser MA, Ben Mamoun C, Krause PJ. Babesiosis. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2015;29(2):357-370.

Xi Y, Li X, Liu L, et al. Sneaky tactics: Ingenious immune evasion mechanisms of Bartonella. Virulence. 2024;15(1):2322961.

Zhang Y, Alvarez-Manzo H, Leone J, Schweig S, Zhang Y. Botanical Medicines Cryptolepis sanguinolenta, Artemisia annua, Scutellaria baicalensis, Polygonum cuspidatum, and Alchornea cordifolia Demonstrate Inhibitory Activity Against Babesia duncani. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:624745.

_______________

**Comment**

Please keep in mind this is one doctor’s opinion who just happens to make money off the very thing he promotes, so there’s a definite conflict of interest.

Also, since treating over a long period of time is often required, keep an open mind, and be willing to experiment.  It is common knowledge that people respond quite differently to treatment.  Wisdom and finesse is required for this journey.  Your best bet is to see an experienced Lyme literate doctor.

Personally, I can say I’ve used nearly everything out there – and some things definitely worked better than others, but again, what worked for me may not work for you.  Also, it’s important to understand dosages, pulsing, and cycling of treatments as these issues can make all the difference.

For more:

https://worldcouncilforhealth.substack.com/p/the-silent-tsunami-is-your-wifi-contributing?

The ‘Silent Tsunami’: Is Your WiFi Contributing to the Rise of Superbugs?

Olle Johansson: Bacteria exposed to mobile phones and WiFi radiation become resistant to antibiotics

What if the wireless tech that powers your everyday life—your phone, WiFi, and even baby monitors—was silently fueling the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria?

In this article Olle Johansson, Ph.D, delivers a chilling wake-up call: our love for convenience and progress might be helping bacteria outsmart the very antibiotics designed to save us.

The World Health Organization already calls antibiotic resistance the “silent tsunami”—a threat so severe it surpasses even the Covid-19 pandemic in its potential devastation. But Johansson takes it a step further, presenting evidence that electromagnetic radiation from devices like cell phones and WiFi may be accelerating bacterial resistance. Could our tech obsession be creating a perfect storm for superbugs to thrive? If left unchecked, this invisible threat could make once-minor infections untreatable and life-threatening. It’s time to hit pause on our wireless world—for the sake of life itself.


Stop! In the Name of Life!

Bacteria Exposed to Mobile Phones and WiFi Radiation Become Resistant to Antibiotics

Article Excerpts:

Occurrence of new, antibiotic-resistant, high-risk bacterial clones

A short time ago, in November 2024, I read that a multi-resistant strain of the Escherichia coli (E. coli) bacteria has taken hold in Europe. According to a new study, the occurrence of new, more resistant forms of a high-risk clone has increased sharply in recent years, including also in my own country, Sweden. Traditionally, E. coli bacteria are spread via water, food and contact with infected humans, the latter especially in hospitals where a lot of antibiotics are used.

By mapping the genetic mass of the E. coli bacteria, the European infection control
agency, The European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), in collaboration with, among others, the Swedish Public Health Agency, has been able to show how the resistant bacteria that carry ESBL-CARBA (Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase with Carbapenemase Activity, a substance found in some bacteria that makes them resistant to certain antibiotics) has spread within and between European countries. The study was recently published in the journal Eurosurveillance (Kohlenberg et al. 2024).

”The study gives further evidence of the serious increase in multi-resistant bacteria that risks reducing the possibility of treating severe bacterial infections in the future. Urgent measures are required to counter the spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in Sweden and globally”, says Vilhelm Müller, investigator at the Swedish Public Health Agency.

Infections difficult to treat now will become very difficult, or even impossible, to treat in the near future … and that will also include ordinary, everyday ones!

Resistant bacteria a global health threat

The World Health Organization (WHO) classifies carbapenem-resistant bacteria as a global health threat and of the highest priority for research and development of new treatment methods. The ECDC study emphasizes the importance of continuing to develop and improve the conditions for reducing the spread of multi-resistant bacteria.

Antibiotic resistance, cell phone and WiFi radiations, and bacterial communication using microwaves

Surprisingly enough, nothing is – however – mentioned about the very recent results of several international research units like that of Taheri et al. (2017, see here), who have demonstrated that the exposure to 900 MHz GSM mobile phone radiation and 2.4 GHz radiofrequency radiation emitted from common Wi-Fi routers made Listeria monocytogenes and Escherichia coli bacteria resistant to different antibiotics. These findings naturally have direct implications for the management of serious infectious diseases (cf. above), and may potentially lead to a future collapse of the global human population.

Another very important study is the US DARPA-funded one (Rao et al. 2022) which has found that bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus, biofilms communicate using frequencies that are in the range used by Wi-Fi and 5G C-band. The experiment found that notable radiation is observed in the 3-4 GHz band coming from the Staphylococcus aureus biofilms.

Radiation from three identical biofilm samples was monitored and recorded over 70 days. Two distinct frequency bands, namely the 3.18 GHz and the 3.45 GHz bands, were identified as potential “communication bands”. Furthermore, long-term and short-term cycles of the total radiation intensity within the band were observed over the course of the experiment.

So this recent study indicates that bacterial cells in biofilms may use electromagnetic signals to communicate which are of the similar type as our own cell phone and WiFi signals! Biofilms are one of the most ubiquitous forms of biological systems on earth, and are commonly associated with infectious diseases. They are also responsible for contamination of medical devices and implants, deterioration of water quality, and microbial-induced corrosion.

This work confirms the presence of electromagnetic radiation within bacterial communities, which is a key requirement to demonstrate electromagnetic signalling among bacterial cells. The insight could lead to breakthroughs in demystifying how cells communicate as well as the advancement of important technologies in biology and communication systems. But, much more importantly, this is a very firm and strong warning to mankind to stop playing with biology here on Earth – we may have to very profoundly regret it.

Soil bacteria are also affected by radiation from mobile phone towers

It must also be noted that Sharma Antim Bala and coworkers (2018) have demonstrated the impact of the radiations transmitted by mobile tower base stations on microbial diversity in soil and antibiotic resistance patterns. Soil samples were taken from near four different base stations located in Dausa City, India, while control samples were taken far from any base stations.

A statistically significant greater antibiotic resistance was observed in microbes present in the soil near base stations compared to the control, using nalidixic acid and cefixime as antimicrobial agents (p<0.05). The authors stated that ”our findings suggest that mobile tower radiation can significantly alter the vital systems in microbes and turn them multidrug-resistant, which is the most important current threat to public health”.

The functional impairment electrohypersensitivity, food, bacteria, and artificial radiation

Finally, it should be noted that people with severe electrohypersensitivity have noticed a direct relationship between the severity of their functional impairment and sugar ingested (not white sugar, but sugary food), and as a result, heightened levels of electromagnetic field sensitivity. Such a direct relationship to their diet/internal bad gut load just from one day of cheating on a diet can result in a massively overwhelming and irritating increase of the electromagnetic field sensitivity during the next day.

So the impact on gut bacteria (E. coli; Candida albicans?) by diet perhaps may trigger attacks of electrohypersensitivity?

(See link for article)

_________________

For more:

https://gingerbreggin.substack.com/p/weather-manipulation-damaging-our?

Weather manipulation: Damaging our health, our economies, and our world

Any effective military will invest whatever it can to predict, manage, and manipulate weather systems.

Article Excerpts:

Growing Concern About Abuses of Weather Control in the US

Many concerns have arisen that Earth’s weather is being manipulated in ways harmful to the citizenry and the economy. The hurricane that hit the Hawaiian Island of Maui and the accompanying firestorm that devastated the town of Lahaina in 2023 with grave loss of life and destruction of the community appeared very suspicious. Hurricane Helene and then Milton chewed up Florida and demolished Southeastern Appalachia communities in North Carolina and Eastern Tennessee. Have behaved in unusual ways and produced unusual and shockingly high amounts of damage and loss of life. Many citizens have questioned what aspects of the storms may have been “enhanced” or manipulated. The lack of official assistance being provided to survivors of these devastating events has understandably increased suspicion.

The federal government has done nothing to alleviate citizen concerns; instead, it has encouraged censorship through social media. The usual claims of conspiracy theory have been lobbed against anyone raising these questions, but as it turns out, citizens are asking very good questions.

Government Censorship

The federal government censors and curtails information and public discussion on subjects like weather manipulation. For a good review of the state of government censorship in the world today, listen to the Joe Rogan interview with Mike Benz that aired this month. The federal government funds, coordinates, and gives orders to its own branches and federal agencies and to non-government organizations (NGOs), nonprofits, universities, and others to censor and eliminate free speech. There are literally hundreds of thousands of hired individuals manipulating the truth as hired guns through traditional news outlets, social media, university outlets, book publishers, and scientific journals.

Weather Modification, Inc.

The absurdity of these government denials was recently highlighted by a photo of a plane on TikTok with a large corporate logo across its fuselage that said, “Weather Modification, International.” The Weather Modification International website was surprisingly empty, but when I checked the web archive for earlier versions, I found that their website started being stripped of data in early 2020. The 2019 archive offered a more robust introduction to the company. Turns out, Weather Modification Inc. has been operating since its founding in 1961 by two farmers/pilots. As of 2019, the company had grown to almost 40 aircraft and 100 personnel. Here is a screenshot of the 2019 “Who We Are” web page.

Weather Modification, Incorporated has been in business since 1961.

The client list for the United States included the US Department of Defense (DOD), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and its National Hurricane Center, the Naval Surface Warfare Center, several state cloud seeding or weather modification programs, and more. They also have a number of international government clients.

Our Guest Today, Jim Lee

Jim Lee has been gathering and sharing news regarding weather manipulation since 2012. He has gathered and published a collection of historical evidence and news about weather modification that I believe is unmatched anywhere else. His goals are to “enact changes in laws worldwide to bring transparency and accountability for weather modification and geoengineering experiments.” The interview with Jim Lee makes clear that there is nothing conspiratorial about weather modification except the government’s attempts to hide it from the public.

ICAN’s INVESTIGATION INTO GEOENGINEERING, MILITARY SPRAYING & SELF-SPREADING VACCINES

Siri & Glimstad Attorney, Catherine Ybarra, Esq., presents ICAN’s assessment of the science behind geoengineering and transmissible vaccines. Discover the lengths the research team went to, to uncover the government agencies involved in current and future weather modification, and a few surprising discoveries they made along the way.

AIRDATE: January 16, 2025

For more:

https://thehighwire.com/ark-videos/new-study-confirms-fluorides-toxic-effects/  Video Here (Approx. 6 Min)

NEW STUDY CONFIRMS FLUORIDE’S TOXIC EFFECTS

The tide may have finally turned with mainstream news on fluoride safety after a recently published study on the significant association between fluoride exposure and lower IQs in children reaffirms previous findings.

AIRDATE: January 16, 2025

Study Excerpt:

Conclusions and Relevance  This systematic review and meta-analysis found inverse associations and a dose-response association between fluoride measurements in urine and drinking water and children’s IQ across the large multicountry epidemiological literature.

For more:

It’s all here in bright purple crayon.  Fluoride must go.  It’s a toxin and it’s doing far more than lowering childrens’ IQs.

https://danielcameronmd.com/femoral-neuropathy-neurologic-symptom-lyme-disease/

Lyme disease triggers neuropathy in the legs

Man with neuropathy due to Lyme disease receiving physical therapy.

It is well-recognized that Lyme disease can cause neurologic symptoms, such as peripheral neuropathy when the infection goes untreated. Patients can experience muscle weakness and/or twitching, loss of sensation in parts of the body, numbness, tingling sensations, problems with balance and bladder control, and a feeling of dizziness or faintness. But now, new research indicates that femoral neuropathy may also be due to Lyme disease.

A case report by Lazaro and Butt, published in the International Medical Case Reports Journal, describes a 67-year-old patient with Lyme disease and femoral neuropathy.¹ This is believed to be the first reported case of isolated femoral neuropathy triggered by Lyme disease.

Femoral neuropathy, also referred to as femoral nerve dysfunction, involves a loss of movement or sensation in parts of the legs due to damage to the femoral nerve.

The patient, who lived in central New York, a region endemic for Lyme disease, developed a large erythema migrans (EM or bull’s-eye) rash on his chest, which lasted for 3 weeks, along with swelling of his left knee.

An IgG Western blot test for Lyme disease was positive, and he was treated with a 4-week course of doxycycline.

“Shortly after the completion of the doxycycline therapy, this patient began complaining of gait difficulties and frequent falls, as well as intermittent painful cramps in his right thigh.”

An electromyography (EMG) test, which measures muscle response or electrical activity when a nerve muscle is stimulated, indicated the patient had a femoral neuropathy.

READ MORE: Small fiber neuropathy in Lyme disease and COVID-19

“A year after the onset of the disease, and following an extensive course of physical therapy, this patient was able to return to his full-time work as an attendant in a local store,” writes Lazaro.

“We firmly believe that the femoral neuropathy and Lyme disease seen in this patient were causally related,” the authors conclude.

This patient’s femoral neuropathy could have developed into a multifocal neuropathy, which involves damage to 2 or more different nerve areas, if the antibiotic treatment had been delayed.

“… if not for a timely institution of antimicrobial therapy, [the femoral neuropathy] might have evolved into a more overt or disseminated infectious or parainfectious process, affecting both the peripheral and central nervous systems.”

The authors’ findings suggest that femoral neuropathy is “analogous to facial nerve palsy as a presenting symptom of Lyme disease without the overt involvement of other cranial or peripheral nerves.”

The list of peripheral neuromuscular segments affected in Lyme disease has grown to include the nerve cell bodies and their axons, all of the cranial nerves except the olfactory nerve, the nerve roots, the brachial and lumbosacral plexuses, and the peripheral nerves, either in isolation or as part of a multiple or diffuse neuropathic process.²-³

References:
  1. Lazaro RP, Butt K. Femoral mononeuropathy in Lyme disease: a case report. Int Med Case Rep J. 31 July 2019, Pages 243-247.
  2. Halperin JJ. Lyme disease and the peripheral nervous system. Muscle Nerve. 2003;28:133–147.
  3. Logigian EL. Peripheral nervous system Lyme borreliosis. Semin Neurol. 1997;17:25–29.

For more: