https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/p/the-history-and-therapeutic-mechanisms?

The History and Therapeutic Mechanisms Of Chlorine Dioxide

Chlorine dioxide was discovered over 200 years ago. It’s use has steadily expanded into many industries and therapeutic applications despite a near global regulatory blockade on clinical research.

I believe that my writings on chlorine dioxide are the most important (and the most dangerous) work I have yet done on Substack. Although several experts have written extensively on this topic previously (here, here, and here), this similar effort of mine simply results from my wish to become as knowledgeable as possible about this critically important therapeutic (there is no better way to do so than personally researching and writing about a topic).

This is the 3rd in my ongoing series of posts. In the first two I presented the political context in which chlorine dioxide has been attacked during Covid (“Trump’s Bleach Conference”) and in the 2nd post I detailed the success achieved by Bolivia’s national chlorine dioxide program against Covid.

In this post I will review its discovery, chemical properties, industrial applications, and therapeutic mechanisms. Upcoming posts will cover the history of the attacks faced by the pioneering researchers and practitioners, followed by a review of the safety studies of oral ingestion and a compilation of studies showing efficacy in a number of diseases. Be sure to subscribe so as not to miss out on these critical upcoming posts.

Ultimately, what me and my growing network of clinical and scientific experts of this therapeutic compound want to achieve, is for the FDA (and the copycat regulatory agencies worldwide) to lift its restrictions on performing clinical research trials of chlorine dioxide in human diseases. If anyone from MAHA is reading this right now (and I know some are), please add chlorine dioxide (and DMSO) to the list of therapies currently being suppressed by the FDA that need to be reversed (RFK Jr listed more than a dozen other such therapies in the below recent tweet).  

Overall, studies and treatment experiences reveal that treatment with chlorine dioxide:

  1. is broadly antimicrobial against nearly all infectious pathogens
  2. reduces inflammation
  3. prevents scarring
  4. aids in wound healing
  5. is non-toxic when orally ingested (in appropriate concentrations)
  6. reduces oral plaque
  7. treats oral atrophic candidiasis
  8. is a potent deodorizer
  9. has in-vitro anti-cancer cell effects, stimulates an in-vivo anti-cancer cell immune response and is also effective when injected intra-tumorally, or via a combination of oral, enema, and IV administration.

This combination of properties is not found in any other compound. The therapeutic uses for chlorine dioxide are endless. (See link for article as well as for the reasons it’s different than bleach)

________________

https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/p/the-safety-of-orally-ingested-chlorine?

The Safety Of Orally Ingested Chlorine Dioxide At Commonly Used Treatment Doses

Contrary to the edicts of regulatory agencies worldwide that chlorine dioxide is “bleach,” “bleach-like,” or a “poison,” numerous studies show the safety of oral ingestion at treatment doses.

Disclaimer:

Due to the history of persecutions and attacks on researchers and practitioners of chlorine dioxide as a therapy, I have to emphasize that in these posts, my intent is not to recommend treatment via oral ingestion of chlorine dioxide because;

  • It is not FDA approved for oral ingestion to treat any disease
  • It is not approved as an orally ingested therapy by any other regulatory agency in the world.
  • It is not classified as a food supplement.

Further, no chlorine dioxide formulation product on the market either meets or has been evaluated in terms of quality and safety for oral ingestion and thus do not meet Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP standards. Also, even if the over the counter products are relatively safe, it is doubtful that people know how to correctly make or store the resulting solution. For instance, it must be mixed with distilled water and be kept out of sunlight in amber glass or plastic bottles (never metal!). Further, (when exposed to sunlight there is a chance that chlorine can be produced, something that can introduce the potential for harm).

Thus, it would be illegal and irresponsible for me to recommend treatment via oral ingestion with it, despite the fact that numerous over-the-counter products for mucosal or skin applications have been allowed on the market (oral, nasal, sinus, and skin).

What is weird is that although it would be illegal for me or anyone to treat Covid with it, a law was passed in Bolivia in early Covid (over the strenuous objections of the regulatory health agencies) which allowed for the widespread manufacture and distribution of chlorine dioxide to be taken by oral ingestion by the military and universities there (albeit under controlled and standardized processes). Millions of Bolivians thus were treated with oral ingested chlorine dioxide for Covid. This effort, I believe, is the reason Bolivia’s outcomes in Covid were the best in South America, something I covered in a prior post on chlorine dioxide here.

From ChemicalSafetyFacts.org: Nearly 500 years ago, Swiss physician and chemist Paracelsus expressed the basic principle of toxicology: “All things are poison and nothing is without poison; only the dose makes a thing not a poison.” This is often condensed to: “The dose makes the poison.” It means that a substance that contains toxic properties can cause harm only if it occurs in a high enough concentration.  (See link for article)

_______________

**Comment**

Kory points out that ‘authorities’ don’t recommend oral CDS due to toxicity and danger, but they never clearly indicate either the dose or administration route for this supposed toxicity.  Since it is regularly used globally for water purification, humans routinely ingest CDS.

The EPA has registered CDS as a “pesticide” [i.e. antimicrobial] due to its ability to eliminate microorganisms such as bacteria, viruses, and parasites from surface water, thereby rendering it safe to drink(EPA, 2006)

Kory then goes through all the hoops to show the doses used in treatment protocols are far less than what has been established to produce adverse effects in chronic ingestion and nowhere near the levels used in industrial applications.  It’s also less lethal than caffeine.  He explains the differences between Mineral Miracle Solution (MMS) and Chlorine Dioxide Solution (CDS) as well as chlorine, chloride, chlorate and chlorite. Dr. Klacker mo longer recommends the two-component CD (also known as MMS) due to adverse effects like diarrhea or vomiting, more acidic pH level, and sodium chlorite which can cause secondary reactions in the stomach.  CDS (ClO2) us a gas dissolved in water which is neutral pH and does not contain chlorite salts.

There are dozens of papers extolling the benefits and safety of topical CDS for wound management and microbial control.  A guidebook also states a mouthwash with CDS managed chronic candidiasis.  Due to the organisms the make up our microbiome generating significant amounts of reactive oxygen species (ROS), we are protected from the oxidizing effects of CDS, but it is strong enough to kill pathogens.

For more:

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/the-agencies-that-betrayed-public?

The Agencies That Betrayed Public Trust

New studies confirms that those of us who reported waning and negative efficacy were right.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the entire Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) have demonstrated a shocking dereliction of duty in their handling of the COVID-19 vaccination program. These agencies set a clear standard: under the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), COVID-19 vaccines had to demonstrate at least 50% efficacy in preventing symptomatic infection to justify their use before full licensure.

That benchmark was not met. Not only did the vaccines fail to prevent infection, but their effectiveness against hospitalization and death declined rapidly. Instead of pausing, reassessing, or at the very least acknowledging their failure, these agencies doubled down, pushing new boosters with no new randomized controlled trials (RCTs), censoring dissenting scientists, and manipulating public perception to sustain a broken public health narrative.

A bombshell study published in Annals of Internal Medicine “Effectiveness of the 2023-to-2024 XBB.1.5 COVID-19 Vaccines Over Long-Term Follow-up: A Target Trial Emulation” (February 2025) has finally laid bare the truth. Over a six-month period, the real-world data from the Veterans Health Administration showed that the XBB.1.5 monovalent COVID-19 vaccine had a negative effectiveness rate of -3.26% against infection—meaning vaccinated individuals were more likely to get COVID-19 than their unvaccinated counterparts. Effectiveness against hospitalization was a mere 16.64%, and against death, only 26.61%. Worse yet, these numbers collapsed over time—by day 176 post-vaccination, protection against hospitalization and death had declined so much that any claimed benefit was effectively negligible.

The FDA’s own standard required vaccines to demonstrate at least 50% effectiveness, yet these numbers didn’t prompt any course correction. Instead, the agencies covered it up and moved the goalposts—first from stopping infection to preventing hospitalization, then from preventing hospitalization to merely reducing death, and finally to the vague and unmeasurable claim of “mitigating severe outcomes.”

This is not public health. This is scientific and medical malpractice.

(See link for article)

______________

**Comment**

Since ‘public health’ isn’t doing the science, there’s now a private $3.5 Million foundation grant for honest scientists to publish papers documenting the existence of ‘vaccines’ causing autism, which has already been confirmed by a top government expert.

If you can’t go with it, you must go around it.
Similarly to Lymeland, if you want any decent research you have to fund it and do it yourself.

Weiler also wrote,  How to Talk with People as They Wake Up from the CDC’s Mass Propaganda on Universal Vaccine Safety and the Very Definition of Science, in response to Leana Wen’s a WaPo Opinion piece on how to respond to loved ones ‘lured’ by RFK’s ‘anti-vaccine’ stance.

Excerpt from Weiler’s piece:

Instead of manipulating the public’s perception of risk, public health needs to earn trust—and that won’t happen until it stops minimizing vaccine injury and death instead of manipulating the public’s perception of risk.

Internal CDC emails, FOIA documents, and whistleblower testimony have exposed a disturbing truth: the CDC’s primary concern has not been minimizing vaccine injury and death—but rather manipulating the public’s perception of those risks.

The question isn’t whether vaccines have risks—the government’s own reporting systems confirm that they do. The real question is: why has the CDC spent decades hiding and dismissing these risks instead of acting to reduce them?

The CDC’s strategy: Control the Narrative, do not do science.

(See link for article)

Boom!  Truth bomb front and center.

This CDC strategy has ruled Lymeland for over 40 years.

________________

https://x.com/toobaffled/status/1889090641684271272?&mx=2  Video Here (Approx. 5 Min)

Powerful presentation from Dr Christine Drivdahl-Smith before the Montana House Judiciary Committee on the bill to ban the use of MRNA “vaccinations.”

“Gene based vaccines, or MRNA vaccines are the most destructive and lethal medical products that have ever been used in medical history. I am asking you to support this bill banning gene based ‘vaccines’ so we can halt continued harm, disability and death of our citizens.” ~ Dr. Christine Drivdahl-Smith

Several other States including Florida, Washington, Idaho, Texas, and Iowa are expected to follow suit.

Scientists and doctors have been screaming about the dangers and that surges in deadly cancers in the vaxxed were caused by DNA fragments in the shots, not to mention they contain at least 55 undeclared chemical elements.  Now, a peer-reviewed study shuts down years of dismissals by revealing DNA levels exceeded safety limits by 6-470 times.  

The FDA is expected to comment on the findings this month.  (Don’t expect anything)

Despite repeated warnings that align with earlier reports from independent laboratories in the United States, Canada, Australia, Germany, and France, the agency has yet to issue an alert, recall the affected batches, or explain how they were allowed to reach the market in the first place.

Warning after warning after warning  after warning has gone unheeded.

The vast amount of death and maiming don’t seem to matter either.

For More:

https://mailchi.mp/advs.ca/live-webinar-max-capacity-issue-solved?

Live DMSO Webinar 

With Amandha Vollmer
Mark Your Calendar
Date: Wednesday, February 26th, 2025
Time: 7:00 PM Eastern Time
Where: LIVE on Zoom (Invite link will be provided early next week)
Since Amandha will be hosting the event, she will ensure a larger max capacity so everyone can join the conversation. Plus, we’re excited to announce that this is just the beginning…
More Great News!
We’ll be launching a whole series of events on the natural healing power of DMSO in the near future — stay tuned for more details.
Thank you for your support and enthusiasm. We can’t wait to see you there!
The Team at DMSO.store

Good News:

The webinar recording will be available on the Yummy.Doctor website within the next week. 

For more:

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/introducing-homeopathy

Introducing Homeopathy The Film

Don’t miss the film that is so compelling, it will open people’s eyes to homeopathy. Premiering on CHD TV February 17, 2025 at 10 a.m. ET & 6 p.m. ET. Go to top link to sign up to watch!

Homeopathy is a powerful healing modality that changes lives. Until now, its voice has been silenced across the medical landscape. Introducing Homeopathy is a new professionally produced, feature-length film dedicated to bringing homeopathy into every household and healthcare system globally.

A team of award-winning producers and writers tell the story of homeopathy through interviews with some of the world’s leading homeopaths, medical practitioners, and scientists.

Together, they reveal the true power of homeopathy.

PREMIERINGFEBRUARY 17, 2025
10 a.m. ET & 6 p.m. ET

https://drlf.substack.com/p/new-review-paper-on-hydroxychloroquine?

New review paper on hydroxychloroquine by Professor Christian Perrone’s research group

I am pleased to report about the new peer-reviewed research paper published on the use of hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of COVID-19 by Professor Christian Perronne’s research group. The corresponding author is Dr. Alexis Lacout affiliated with the Surgical Medical Center of Tronquieres in Aurillac, France. This is a review paper, so no new results are presented. However it puts together a definitive compendium of the available evidence in favor of the use of hydroxychloroquine based multidrug protocols for the treatment of COVID-19. Xavier Azalbert, one of the paper’s co-authors, gave an informative interview about this work with John Davidson.

The authors review in detail the early evidence available in favor of hydroxychloroquine from China and the mechanisms of action that made it plausible that it would be an effective treatment for COVID-19. They also give a brief overview of the flawed studies that followed, which purported to discredit the use of hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 treatment. The authors then review the cardiac safety of the medication, and discuss blatantly fraudulent studies attempting to discredit hydroxychloroquine, that were subsequently retracted. The paper concludes with a review of the positive evidence in support of the prophylactic use of hydroxychloroquine to prevent symptomatic COVID-19 infection, and other studies supporting the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in preventing hospitalizations and deaths.

This paper does not cover the same ground as my shorter comment publication that was published last year in the Tasman Medical Journal, focusing on the analysis Dr. Zev Zelenko’s early data of his triple drug hydroxychloroquine-based protocol which enhanced Dr. Didier Raoult’s protocol with the addition of zinc. Also not mentioned was the early meta-analysis by Dr. Raphael Stricker in support of the prophylactic use of hydroxychloroquine based on several early studies on Indian health workers. Nevertheless, this paper stands its ground on its own, and perfectly complements my work and the work by Dr. Stricker.

Although ivermectin-based protocols, such as the one by Dr. Jackie Stone, have proven themselves to be superior, ivermectin does have some limitations, e.g. it cannot be used with pregnant women, and during 2021 the community standard of care advocated by Dr. Zelenko combined both medications. That being said, this is an important paper for educating the Neanderthals that have not yet realized that they were lied to by the powers that be about hydroxychloroquine. With the worst of the pandemic in the rearview mirror, the persecution of pioneering doctors like Dr. Didier Raoult has intensified. The guilty understand that they are wrong and are now trying to erase history. They want their sins forgotten. This must never be allowed to happen.

(See link for article)

________________

For more:

Dr. Perronne is one of the good guys.  He’s the one that said the COVID policy is ‘Completely Stupid” & ‘Unethical’.

He was then summarily fired.
A year later the French Order of Physicians exonerated him for acting in the best interest of citizens and his profession.

Oh, what a difference a year makes.