Pfizer researched and developed their COVID-19 mRNA injections independent of the Operation Warp Speed program while demanding to maintain ownership and control of their human safety data.
June 18, 2024: Yesterday, Attorney General Kris Kobach broke the news that 4 other states will be joining Kansas in suing Pfizer for willfully concealing, suppressing, and/or omitting material evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of their mRNA injections.
Per the lawsuit, the Big pharma giant conspired with individuals from Health & Human Services, the media, universities, social media platforms, and other businesses and organization in order to manipulate the American people into receiving an injection that they would have otherwise declined if Pfizer had accurately disclosed their COVID-19 mRNA clinical data and adverse events reports to the public and US government.
Why Are 5 U.S. States Suing Pfizer and NOT Moderna?
Per this 4-minute video clip, Kobach addresses the unconscionable acts that Pfizer committed and the reason why he and other state Attorneys General are suing Pfizer first, and not Moderna or J&J. (See link for article and video)
______________
**Comment**
In short, Pfizer did not participate in the Operation Warp Speed program. They remained separate to avoid government oversight and to maintain control (and secrecy) of their data reports. Our government is still guilty of conspiring with them as well as the media by coughing up $1 Billion to promote the shots. This historical lesson shows that the CIA regularly infiltrates the media, but that now it IS the media. For decades it has planted news stories.
Again, this is not informed consent. This is propaganda where people are being paid.
Kingston does a great job explaining the intricacies of contracts and how Pfizer has remained separate from government funding, etc. She questions if five states suing could spell the end of the mRNA injections. She also recommends contacting your attorney general and state prosecutor’s office to file a similar suit against Pfizer. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a similar lawsuit against Pfizer last November.
June 17 (Reuters) – The U.S. state of Kansas on Monday sued Pfizer (PFE.N), opens new tab, accusing the company of misleading the public about its COVID-19 vaccine by hiding risks while making false claims about its effectiveness.
In a lawsuit, opens new tab filed in the District Court of Thomas County, the state said the New York-based drugmaker’s alleged false statements violated the Kansas Consumer Protection Act. It is seeking unspecified money damages……
The lawsuit claims that, beginning shortly after the vaccine’s rollout in early 2021, Pfizer concealed evidence that the shot was linked to pregnancy complications, including miscarriage, as well as inflammation in and around the heart, known as myocarditis and pericarditis. (See link for article)
Our corrupt public health agencies protect this company, and it’s taken a court of law to even get Pfizer’s trial data, which should be accessible to everyone.
BREAKING Publication: COVID-19 Vaccines: A Risk Factor for Cerebral Thrombotic Syndromes
Unacceptable Hazard for Blood Clots to the Brain
JUN 19, 2024
By Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH
I have several patients who have suffered multiple strokes after COVID-19 vaccination. The Spike protein is known to circulate in blood as shown by Brogna et al in half of vaccinated patients for at least six months. Other studies have demonstrated the Spike protein directly damages the wall of the blood vessels and causes blood clots.
Rogers et al use the CDC Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System to compare rates of cerebral thrombosis among COVID-19 vaccine recipients to the large number of individuals who take an influenza vaccine annually. The vast majority of events reported to VAERS are made by doctors and other healthcare providers who have determined the vaccine is the cause of the problem. Compared to influenza vaccines given over 34 years, COVID-19 vaccines in 36 months of use had over 1000-fold increased risk of most blood clot events, and compared to all vaccines combined administered over 34 years, this risk remained at over 200-times greater with COVID-19 vaccination.
This paper did not capture the level of permanent neurologic devastation and disability suffered by these patients. I can tell you that the rates must be very high given the extensive nature of the blood clots reported. These data among others strongly support removing all COVID-19 vaccines and boosters from the market. No one should be put at risk for a serious stroke with any vaccine. (See link for article)
Anthony Fauci’s new book has granted the public more detail concerning the truly impeccable timing of Pfizer’s mRNA Covid-19 vaccine trial data rollout.
The original deal with Pfizer was negotiated by the Trump Administration during the days of Operation Warp Speed. It paid the pharma giant $19.50 a dose. The Biden Administration would eventually sign off on a deal to give Pfizer approximately$30.48 per dose, resulting in an astronomical 56+% hike from the deal negotiated by the Trump administration.
At the peak of Covid hysteria, Pfizer was bringing in almost $10 billion in net income per quarter, thanks to a 33% mRNA profit margin in the U.S. market. (See link for article).
In an interview with CNN this week, Deborah Birx suggested the imposition of a massive testing and surveillance regime to combat the possibility of a bird flu pandemic.
Birx, the former White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator, laid out her battle plan against bird flu for CNN’s Kasie Hunt.
“We should be testing every cow, weekly,” Birx declared, adding, “we could be pool testing every dairy worker.”
The good news for Birx is that she would never let the facts and scientific evidence get in the way of her ill-advised ideas. (See link for article)
____________
**Comment**
Remember, Birx previously served on the board of the Bill Gates-funded Global Fund. She and former CDC Director Robert Redfield, both Army medical officers, knowingly falsified scientific data and were charged with data manipulation and misleading data presentation. Since leaving government work she has already earned MILLIONS in the private sector particularly with Big Pharma. This should tell you everything you need to know.
A few points:
There’s no evidence that birds transmit ‘Bird flu’ to humans.
There’s no evidence for human to human transmission of ‘Bird flu’.
They now need to push the cow to human angle to create fear and to cull our food source which could create shortages.
The USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service tested meat from condemned cows. Late last month the agency announced that 95 of 96 culled cowstested negative for viral particles.
The agency also experimented with inoculating meat with high levels of the virus and then cooking it and testing for the virus. The virus was not detected in the meat patties cooked to medium or well-done, and it was “substantially inactivated” in the rare patties.
The FDA also tested retail dairy products in 17 states and noted that PCR-positive results “do not necessarily represent live virus that may be a risk to consumers,” so when they found PCR-positive samples, they further tested them through a process called “egg inoculation.” The agency found many samples with positive PCR tests, but none tested positive for the live virus.
Finland is already offering the ‘vaccine’ to select groups.
Evidence suggests that the current ‘bird flu’ in the U.S. is due to ‘gain of function’ research being done at the University of Wisconsin – Madison and in Athens, Georgia. Remember that Yoshihiro Kawaoka (WI) and Ron Fouchier (Netherlands) have been pushing the virus to infect humans and Wisconsin has already had a safety breach.
FDA Commissioner Robert Califf’s pronouncements about a potential bird flu pandemic appears suspect in light of the fact it came right before the vote on the (WHO) pandemic treaty and amendments to the IHR.
Lots of money is involved:
The federal government last month announced a new round of funding to reduce the impact of bird flu. The plan appropriated $93 million for the CDC to do virus genomic sequencing, increase monitoring of farmworkers, and improve and expand testing on a national scale for bird flu in animals, wastewater, farmworkers and meat.
The FDA also appropriated an additional $8 million to surveil and test the commercial milk supply.
Lactating dairy cows must be tested for bird flu before they can cross state lines, per an April 24 Federal Order issued by the USDA.
Federal authorities announced in May they would pay farmworkers to get tested and offer incentives to farmers to allow their dairy herds to get tested. Workers are paid $75 for giving the CDC a blood sample and nasal swab.
Government bureaucrat Dr. Anthony Fauci has abused his power since beginning his career with NIAID in 1984. He has directly influenced medicine and health policy world wide yet has never actually treated a patient since his initial four year internship and residency.
But, it’s important to remember that while he was certainly complicit and at the very least agreed to and promoted destructive decisions knowing they would yield unprecedented chaos and ruin, along with Francis Collins, Rochelle Walensky, and many, many others, the National Security Council (NSC) was OZ behind the curtain. This group advises the President on matters of national security – you know, people who advise about war and terrorism.
Ponder this fact for a moment.
War and terrorism. Not public health.
This should reframe everything in a quick hurry.
As noted by Debbie Lerman, nobody’s asking the right questions of the right people.
Regarding the anti-scientific 6ft social distancing rule, it was based on the NSC’s lockdown-until-‘vaccine’ policy, meant to keep everyone terrified and isolated until the application of the miraculous mRNA ‘countermeasures’.
On March 19, 2020 FEMA assumed the lead for the federal response to COVID which was unannounced, unprecedented, and Lerman believes to be illegal. Formerly, and by law, HHS has been designated as Lead Federal Agency for pandemic responses in every document leading up to COVID until FEMA took over, whose parent agency is the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
As noted by Lerman, Dr. McCormick in the video below, and so many others, ALL the directives given by talking heads from public health agencies was not based on actual science or public health policy.
In the most recent Circus act, I mean Congressional hearings, Representative Rich McCormick, who is a decorated veteran and ER physician who treated COVID patients from beginning to end, had much to say to Dr. Anthony Fauci about his mishandling of the ‘pandemic,’ and the fact it will have have devastating effects far into the future.
“It’s been proven that if you make it difficult for people in their lives, they lose their ideological bull-shit and they get vaccinated.” ~ Dr. Anthony Fauci
“Everything I was censored on, I was proven to be right.” ~ Dr. McCormick
It is frightening that so many doctors, politicians, and leaders walked in lock-step behind absurd edicts which not only included peddling a brand-new, never used in humans mRNA gene therapy injection, as well as dangerous, ineffective drugs, including drugs used for lethal injection to treat COVID patients by sedating them for mechanical ventilation, both of which proved to be death sentences.
Dr. Mike Yeadon recently stated that 3 years worth of midazolam was used in a matter of weeks in the UK.
Go here to listen to Dr. Jay Battacharya professor of health policy at Stanford University, co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration, and a plaintiff in Murthy v. Missouri, a landmark free speech case against the Biden Administration who states that the catastrophic response during COVID will happen again until there’s an explicit repudiation of the doctrine by ‘public health.’
“The International Health Regulations and the WHO treaty are a way to essentially institutionalize this paradigm of how to manage pandemics going forward. You can’t have a Sweden next time that bucks the agenda.” ~ Dr. Jay Battacharya
DO NOT PASS THIS BY… MAJOR COLLABORATIVE STUDY FINDS ALL RISK AND NO BENEFIT – STUDY SHOWS 100% OF MYOCARDITIS IN KIDS IS FROM COVID19 SHOTS. MEANWHILE, EFFECTIVENESS DATA SHOW NO BENEFIT TO KIDS.
Study Links COVID-19 mRNA Shots, Not Infection to Heart Failure in Children. This MASSIVE study also shows no benefit in reduction of infection.
ACTION ITEM: CONTACT THE FDA AND DEMAND THEY PREVENT ALL CHILDREN FROM GETTING THESE INJECTIONS. LET THEM KNOW – ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.
A groundbreaking study by researchers from Oxford, Leeds, Harvard, and Bristol has confirmed that myocarditis and pericarditis only appear in children and adolescents following COVID-19 vaccination, not after infection. This extensive research analyzed official government data from over 1 million English children and adolescents, comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated subjects aged 5-11 and 12-15.
Key findings include:
All cases of myocarditis and pericarditis during the study period occurred in vaccinated individuals.
Most myocarditis and pericarditis cases were recorded after the first dose of the vaccine.
Hospitalizations related to COVID-19 were extremely rare among children and adolescents.
Over 50% of children who had myocarditis following the shot required hospitalization.
Read the full study here for more detailed insights. (See link for article, study, and to contact the FDA)
_______________
Remember that Aldén et al has been highly censored but critical to understand. Reverse transcription of mRNA, inserting the foreign code into human DNA has been one of the greatest fears during the mass, indiscriminate ‘vaccination’ campaign. Go here to watch Dr. Peter McCullough discuss how getting the Pfizer or Moderna COVID-19 shot may be permanent for the vaccinated and their progeny.
Prenatal Exposure to COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 Induces Autism-Like Behaviors in Male Neonatal Rats: Insights into WNT and BDNF Signaling Perturbations
Prenatal Exposure to COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 Induces Autism-Like Behaviors in Male Neonatal Rats: Insights into WNT and BDNF Signaling Perturbations
The COVID-19 pandemic catalyzed the swift development and distribution of mRNA vaccines, including BNT162b2, to address the disease. Concerns have arisen about the potential neurodevelopmental implications of these vaccines, especially in susceptible groups such as pregnant women and their offspring. This study aimed to investigate the gene expression of WNT, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels, specific cytokines, m-TOR expression, neuropathology, and autism-related neurobehavioral outcomes in a rat model. Pregnant rats received the COVID-19 mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine during gestation. Subsequent evaluations on male and female offspring included autism-like behaviors, neuronal counts, and motor performance. Molecular techniques were applied to quantify WNT and m-TOR gene expressions, BDNF levels, and specific cytokines in brain tissue samples. The findings were then contextualized within the extant literature to identify potential mechanisms. Our findings reveal that the mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine significantly alters WNT gene expression and BDNF levels in both male and female rats, suggesting a profound impact on key neurodevelopmental pathways. Notably, male rats exhibited pronounced autism-like behaviors, characterized by a marked reduction in social interaction and repetitive patterns of behavior. Furthermore, there was a substantial decrease in neuronal counts in critical brain regions, indicating potential neurodegeneration or altered neurodevelopment. Male rats also demonstrated impaired motor performance, evidenced by reduced coordination and agility. Our research provides insights into the effects of the COVID-19 mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine on WNT gene expression, BDNF levels, and certain neurodevelopmental markers in a rat model. More extensive studies are needed to confirm these observations in humans and to explore the exact mechanisms. A comprehensive understanding of the risks and rewards of COVID-19 vaccination, especially during pregnancy, remains essential.
In a recent meta-analysis1,2 posted on preprints.org, Japanese researchers warn of potentially deadly risks to patients who receive blood from people who have taken mRNA covid injections and call for urgent action to ensure the safety of the global blood supply. According to the authors:3
… many countries around the world have reported that so-called genetic vaccines, such as those using modified mRNA encoding the spike protein and lipid nanoparticles as the drug delivery system, have resulted in post-vaccination thrombosis and subsequent cardiovascular damage, as well as a wide variety of diseases involving all organs and systems, including the nervous system …
[B]ased on these circumstances and the volume of evidence that has recently come to light, we call the attention of medical professionals to the various risks associated with blood transfusions using blood products derived from people who have suffered from long covid and from genetic vaccine recipients, including those who have received mRNA vaccines, and we make proposals regarding specific tests, testing methods, and regulations to deal with these risks.
Blood From Injected Donors May Pose Risk to Neurological Health
One particular risk addressed in this paper is the implications of blood tainted with prion-like structures found within the spike protein. Prions are misfolded proteins that can cause neurodegenerative diseases, such as Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (“CJD”) in humans, by inducing the misfolding of normal proteins in the brain.
Prion diseases are characterised by a long incubation period, followed by rapid progression and high mortality. The suggestion that the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, especially from certain variants, might contain prion-like domains raises concerns for several reasons:
Transmission risk – If spike proteins with prion-like structures can be transmitted through blood transfusions, there might be a risk of inducing prion diseases in recipients. Prion diseases are notoriously difficult to diagnose early, have no cure and are fatal, making any potential transmission through blood products a significant safety concern.
Detection and removal challenges – Current blood screening processes do not specifically test for prions, partly because prion diseases are rare and partly due to the technical challenges in detecting prions at low concentrations. If spike proteins with prion-like properties are present in the blood of covid injected people, existing blood safety protocols may not be adequate to prevent transmission.
Long-term safety concerns – Prion diseases have long latency periods, meaning that symptoms can appear years or even decades after exposure. This delay complicates efforts to trace the source of an infection back to a blood transfusion and assess the safety of blood supplies over time.
Impacts on blood supply management – Concerns about the potential risks associated with prion-like structures in spike proteins might lead to changes in donor eligibility criteria or the implementation of additional screening measures. These changes could impact the availability of blood products, which are critical for routine medical procedures.
Public confidence – Public awareness of these potential risks, even if they are theoretical or have a very low likelihood of occurring, could affect people’s willingness to donate or receive blood transfusions, thereby lowering blood donation rates and the overall trust in the safety of blood transfusions.
The authors stress the need for comprehensive studies to better understand the implications of these prion-like structures in the spike protein, not only for mRNA jab safety but also for the broader implications for public health measures like blood transfusion practices.
Other Potential Health Hazards of Contaminated Blood
Contaminated blood may also pose other serious health risks, including:
1. Reduced immune function among blood recipients – It’s been shown that the more doses of the covid “vaccine” you’ve received, the more likely you are to suffer future infections, either by SARS-CoV-2 or other viruses, due to antibody-dependent enhancement.
Blood donations from people who have received several doses of mRNA injections may not provide adequate immunity against common infections, resulting in subclinical infections and diseases in recipients.
2. Formation of blood clots and amyloid aggregates – If the immune system of a blood recipient isn’t strong enough to neutralise spike protein, blood clots and amyloid aggregates may also form.
3. Chronic inflammation – Prolonged exposure to the antigens from the covid-19 injections can trigger the generation of IgG4 antibodies, resulting in chronic inflammation and immune dysfunction.
IgG4 antibodies are often associated with chronic exposure to antigens, such as those seen in persistent infections, certain cancers, and prolonged exposure to allergens. IgG4 antibodies are also associated with a unique condition known as IgG4-Related Disease (IgG4-RD), a fibro-inflammatory condition characterised by swellings or masses in affected organs.4
Blood Transfusions and the Risk of Autoimmune Diseases
The authors also raise concerns about the potential of contaminated blood to cause autoimmune diseases in recipients. Recent research found that the RNA pseudouridylation, a process in which uracil is swapped out for synthetic methylpseudouridine, can cause frameshifting, basically a glitch in the decoding, which can trigger the production of off-target aberrant proteins.
The antibodies that develop as a result may, in turn, trigger off-target immune reactions. In addition to that, lipid nanoparticles (“LNPs”), a key component of the covid injections, have been identified as highly inflammatory and possessing more potent adjuvant activity compared to traditional vaccine adjuvants, which further increases the risk of an autoimmune response. As reported in the featured paper:5
Recent studies have shown that RNA pseudouridylation can result in frameshifting. It is not yet clear whether a portion of the pseudouridinated mRNA for the spike protein is translated into another protein of unknown function in vaccine recipients. If these proteins are also pathogenic, additional testing for such frameshift proteins may be needed in the future.
Even if a frameshift protein is not toxic, it must be foreign to the body and could cause autoimmune disease. In addition, LNPs themselves are highly inflammatory substances … LNPs have been found to have stronger adjuvant activity than the adjuvants used in conventional vaccines, and there is also concern about autoimmune diseases resulting from this aspect.
Thus, although it is not clear what the causative agent of autoimmune disease is, the large number of reported cases of autoimmune disease following genetic vaccination is extremely concerning.
The very mechanism of gene vaccines that causes one’s own cells to produce the antigens of pathogens carries the risk of inducing autoimmune diseases, which cannot be completely avoided even if mRNA pseudouridylation technology is used.
In this context, individuals with a positive blood test for spike protein may need to have interviews and additional tests for autoimmune disease indicators, such as antinuclear antibodies.
Alternatively, if the amino acid sequence of the protein resulting from the frameshift is predictable, these candidate proteins could be included in the initial mass spectrometry assay. In any case, it is particularly important to develop tests and establish medical care settings in anticipation of these situations.
Proposals for Managing Blood Collection
The authors outline several specific proposals for managing blood collection and blood products from individuals who have received genetic “vaccines.” Given the variety of blood-related abnormalities observed post-injection, the researchers argue that rigorous and precautionary measures in blood handling and transfusion practices have now become a necessity.
A key part of the proposal involves conducting thorough interviews with potential blood donors. These interviews should cover their vaccination status, number of doses received, their covid-19 infection history, and any symptoms they might be experiencing that could indicate conditions like post-vaccination syndrome (“PVS”), long covid or other complications.
The researchers also recommend deferral periods for blood collected from covid injection recipients – 48 hours for mRNA shots and six weeks for AstraZeneca DNA jab recipients. A series of tests are also proposed to ensure the safety of collected blood, including:
Mass spectrometry to measure spike protein content
PCR for detecting the presence of spike protein mRNA and DNA
Testing for markers associated with autoimmune disorders
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
Immunophenotyping
Liquid biopsies combined with proteomics to detect and quantify spike protein and its mRNA
The authors also note that policies and procedures must be constantly revised as new risks and problems with blood products derived from mRNA and DNA injection recipients are identified.
Ensuring Safety of Current Blood Products
The paper also reviews strategies to ensure the safety of blood products already collected, highlighting the complex challenges that medical institutions, regulatory bodies, and the broader healthcare ecosystem must navigate in the wake of the widespread use of mRNA injections.
The primary concern is the risk posed to patients by the use of blood products from donors who have received gene-based injections without confirming the presence or absence of spike proteins or modified mRNA. To ensure their safety, methods to quantify potential contaminants must be developed and implemented as soon as possible.
Another critical issue that must be addressed is the current lack of reliable methods to remove spike proteins or modified mRNA from blood products. The authors warn that, given the potential persistence, low solubility, heat resistance and radiation resistance of these components, current methodologies are inadequate for the job. The only solution, they say, is to discard all blood products found to contain these contaminants until effective removal techniques are established.
Researchers Call for Widespread Blood Testing
Additionally, the researchers call for widespread testing of both injected and non-injected to assess the potential transmission of spike proteins through exosomes (so-called shedding).
As noted by the authors:
… when exosomes collected from vaccine recipients were administered to mice that had not been vaccinated with the genetic vaccine, the spike protein was transmitted.
Therefore, it cannot be denied that the spike protein and its modified genes can be transmitted through exosomes. For this reason, we suggest that full testing be done initially, regardless of genetic vaccination status, and that a cohort study be conducted to quickly capture the full picture …
In addition … it cannot be ruled out that even those who have not been vaccinated with the genetic vaccine, but have had long covid, may have residual spike proteins or fibrin-derived microthrombi in their bodies, so it would be advisable to conduct the same testing and follow-up as for genetic vaccine recipients.
The presence or absence and amount of anti-nucleocapsid antibodies as well as antibody isotypes may be an indicator(s) in distinguishing whether genetic vaccination or long covid is the cause. In any case, these cohort studies are expected to help establish cutoff values for blood levels of spike protein and other substances to determine the safety of blood products.
Faksova et al. conducted a large cohort study of 99 million people using a multinational Global Vaccine Data NetworkTM (GVDN®) and found a significantly increased risk of myocarditis, pericarditis, Guillain-Barre syndrome and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in genetic vaccine recipients.
Ensuring the traceability of blood products and establishing a rigorous legal and regulatory framework to manage the myriad issues arising from the use of blood products derived from covid-injected individuals are also paramount. This includes creating systems for the registration of all potential donors, ensuring the traceability of blood products and conducting recipient outcome studies.
Call to Pause: Evaluating the Risks and Benefits of Genetic Vaccines for a Safer Future
In conclusion, the authors point out that if we continue using mRNA-LPN-based platforms to replace conventional vaccines or create new ones, then the risks to our blood and bone marrow supply will be augmented further.
“The impact of these genetic vaccines on blood products and the actual damage caused by them are unknown at present,” they write.6
Therefore, in order to avoid these risks and prevent further expansion of blood contamination and complication of the situation, we strongly request that the vaccination campaign using genetic vaccines be suspendedand that a harm-benefit assessment be carried out as early as possible, as called for by Fraiman et al.7 and Polykretis et al.8
T]he health injuries caused by genetic vaccination are already extremely serious, and it is high time that countries and relevant organisations take concrete steps together to identify the risks and to control and resolve them.
Dr. Joseph Mercola is the founder and owner of Mercola.com, a Board-Certified Family Medicine Osteopathic Physician, a Fellow of the American College of Nutrition and a New York Times bestselling author. He publishes multiple articles a day covering a wide range of topics on his website Mercola.com.
_______________
Japan Ahead of the Curve
Japan appears to be ahead of the curve not only in showing the seriousness of the mRNA injection issues, but politically as well. Recently, Kazuhiro Haraguichi, former Japanese Minister for Internal Affairs has become the first major politician to apologize to the unvaccinated for the tsunami of deaths occurring among the ‘vaccinated.’ After getting two out of three COVID shots which were from ‘lethal’ batches, he developed a rapidly progressing form of cancer. Three of his colleagues were also severely affected, but they haven’t spoken out. He states those that do are censored. He has urged people to stand united in challenging the government.
Thelibertybeacon.com reports: One of the key points in Haraguchi’s speech was his criticism of the ban on Ivermectin, a drug developed by Dr. Satoshi Omura, which he believed could have played a significant role in combating the pandemic. Haraguchi questioned the motives behind the ban, suggesting that economic interests were prioritized over public health.
Madison Area Lyme Support Group 