Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

“Vaccine” Spike Protein Enters Cell Nuclei & Suppresses DNA Repair – “Vaxxed” Immune Systems Deteriorating About 5% Per Week. They Are Dropping Like Flies

https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-11-02-science-horror-vaccine-spike-protein-enters-cell-nuclei-suppresses-dna-repair-engine-of-the-human-body-cancer-aging  Article and Video Here

SCIENCE HORROR: Vaccine spike protein enters cell nuclei, suppresses DNA repair engine of the human body, will unleash explosion of cancer, immunodeficiency, autoimmune disorders and accelerated aging

Tuesday, November 02, 2021 by:

Image: SCIENCE HORROR: Vaccine spike protein enters cell nuclei, suppresses DNA repair engine of the human body, will unleash explosion of cancer, immunodeficiency, autoimmune disorders and accelerated aging

(Natural News) This finding can only be described as a true “horror” in its implications. Stunning new research published in Viruses, part of the SARS-CoV-2 Host Cell Interactions edition of MDPI (Open Access Journals) reveals that vaccine spike proteins enter cell nuclei and wreak havoc on cells’ DNA repair mechanism, suppressing DNA repair by as much as 90%.

The research paper is entitled, “SARS–CoV–2 Spike Impairs DNA Damage Repair and Inhibits V(D)J Recombination In Vitro” and is authored by Hui Jiang and Ya-Fang Mei, at the Department of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner–Gren Institute, Stockholm University, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden, and the Department of Clinical Microbiology, Virology, Umeå University, SE-90185 Umeå, Sweden, respectively.

We have saved a copy of the research paper in a PDF document on NN servers at this URL:
https://www.naturalnews.com/files/viruses-13-02056-v2.pdf

In the conclusion of the paper, authors write, “We found that the spike protein markedly inhibited both BRCA1 and 53BP1 foci formation (Figure 3D–G). Together, these data show that the SARS–CoV–2 full–length spike protein inhibits DNA damage repair by hindering DNA repair protein recruitment.” (See link for article)

________________

http://

Spike protein inside nucleus enhancing DNA damage? – COVID-19 mRNA vaccines update 18

Nov. 12, 2021

Dr. Mikolaj Raszek, Phd from Merogenomics discusses the Swedish study and states the concern over the spike protein being able to enter the cell nucleus, a forbidden zone, is it could “modulate how we are using our genetics,” and “inhibits proper fixing of broken, damaged DNA.”

Authors of the study propose this might have been evolved in order to prevent genetic recombination required to produce antibody variety to successfully attack the virus. If true, and if this could have important implications for potential negative health outcomes and might require reconfiguration of “vaccine” design.

http://philosophers-stone.info/2021/11/01/immune-systems-of-the-vaccinated-are-deteriorating-at-around-five-percent-per-week/  Video Here

Immune systems of the vaccinated are deteriorating at around five percent per week.

Nov. 1, 2021

According to Dr. Sherry Tenpenny:

Immune systems of the vaccinated are deteriorating at around five percent per week. If this continues then 30-50 year olds will have total immune system degradation, and zero viral defense by Christmas and all doubly vaccinated people over 30 will have lost their immune systems by March next year.

https://theexpose.uk/2021/10/30/gov-reports-show-fully-vaccinated-and-children-developing-ade  Excerpt:

The eight previous Public Health England / UK Health Security Agency ‘Vaccine Surveillance’ reports on Covid-19 cases show that double vaccinated 40-79 year olds have now lost lost 50% of their immune system capability and are consistently losing a further 4-5% every week (between 3.7% and 7.9%).

Projections also now show that 30-49 year olds will have zero Covid / viral defence at best, or a form of vaccine mediated acquired immunodeficiency syndrome at worst, by the first week in January and all double vaccinated people over 30 will have completely lost that part of their immune system which deals with Covid-19 in the next 18 weeks.

Everybody over 30 will have lost 100% of their entire immune capability (certainly for Covid and most likely for viruses and certain cancers – following the evidence from Cole Diagnostics in Idaho and Dr Nathan Thompson and Dr Ralph Baric) within 18 weeks.

Within this article is a video of people passing out and even dying after the injections. Interspersed throughout the video are experts giving crucial information including:

Two separate analyses show that 50% that die, die in the first 48 hours after the shot, and that 80% die within the week.

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Another Whistleblower Promptly Fired For Showing Pfizer Falsified Data. Got Science? Are You Sure?

**UPDATE Feb. 18, 2022**

Here is the case filing of the lawsuit against Pfizer:  https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21206071-brook-jackson-lawsuit

Case 1:21-cv-00008-MJT Filed 01/08/21

Core allegations:

Making or Using False Records or Statements to Cause Claims to be Paid (31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(1)(B)) 284.

  1. “From 2020 to the present, Defendants knowingly made, used, or caused to be made or used, false records or statements that were material to false and/or fraudulent claims paid or approved by the United States DoD. These false records or statements include the clinical trial protocol Pfizer submitted to the United States and the falsified source documents and data behind Defendants’ trial results and EUA application.

  2. By creating and carrying out their fraudulent schemes, Defendants knowingly and repeatedly violated Section 3729(a)(1)(B) of the False Claims Act. 286. Defendants’ false records were material to Pfizer’s claims for payment for the vaccine at issue. The United States DoD would not have paid Pfizer if it knew that the clinical trial protocol was not complied with by Defendants, because the protocol violations call the integrity and validity of both the entire clinical trial and Pfizer’s EUA into question.

  3. Defendants’ false records also went to the very essence of the bargain the United States contracted for. DoD contracted to purchase vaccines found effective by a valid clinical trial conducted according to the protocol submitted by Pfizer. The integrity of the entire clinical trial was compromised by the trial protocol violations, false source documents, and the false data that resulted, which calls the vaccine’s EUA into question. Had the United States DoD known of Defendants’ false records, it would not have paid Pfizer. 288. Defendants’ use, or causation of use, of material false records was a foreseeable factor in the United States DoD’s loss and a consequence of Defendants’ schemes. By virtue of Defendants’ actions, the United States DoD has suffered actual damages and is entitled to recover treble damages plus a civil monetary penalty for each false and/or fraudulent claim.”

    Access: Case 1:21-cv-00008-MJT Filed 01/08/21

https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635.full

Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial

BMJ 2021; 375 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2635 (Published 02 November 2021) Cite this as: BMJ 2021;375:n2635

 
Paul D Thacker, investigative journalist
Author affiliations
Revelations of poor practices at a contract research company helping to carry out Pfizer’s pivotal covid-19 vaccine trial raise questions about data integrity and regulatory oversight. Paul D Thacker reports

In autumn 2020 Pfizer’s chairman and chief executive, Albert Bourla, released an open letter to the billions of people around the world who were investing their hopes in a safe and effective covid-19 vaccine to end the pandemic. “As I’ve said before, we are operating at the speed of science,” Bourla wrote, explaining to the public when they could expect a Pfizer vaccine to be authorised in the United States.1

But, for researchers who were testing Pfizer’s vaccine at several sites in Texas during that autumn, speed may have come at the cost of data integrity and patient safety. A regional director who was employed at the research organisation Ventavia Research Group has told The BMJ that the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in Pfizer’s pivotal phase III trial. Staff who conducted quality control checks were overwhelmed by the volume of problems they were finding. After repeatedly notifying Ventavia of these problems, the regional director, Brook Jackson, emailed a complaint to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Ventavia fired her later the same day. Jackson has provided The BMJ with dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings, and emails.

Poor laboratory management

On its website Ventavia calls itself the largest privately owned clinical research company in Texas and lists many awards it has won for its contract work.2 But Jackson has told The BMJ that, during the two weeks she was employed at Ventavia in September 2020, she repeatedly informed her superiors of poor laboratory management, patient safety concerns, and data integrity issues. Jackson was a trained clinical trial auditor who previously held a director of operations position and came to Ventavia with more than 15 years’ experience in clinical research coordination and management. Exasperated that Ventavia was not dealing with the problems, Jackson documented several matters late one night, taking photos on her mobile phone. One photo, provided to The BMJ, showed needles discarded in a plastic biohazard bag instead of a sharps container box. Another showed vaccine packaging materials with trial participants’ identification numbers written on them left out in the open, potentially unblinding participants. Ventavia executives later questioned Jackson for taking the photos.

Early and inadvertent unblinding may have occurred on a far wider scale. According to the trial’s design, unblinded staff were responsible for preparing and administering the study drug (Pfizer’s vaccine or a placebo). This was to be done to preserve the blinding of trial participants and all other site staff, including the principal investigator. However, at Ventavia, Jackson told The BMJ that drug assignment confirmation printouts were being left in participants’ charts, accessible to blinded personnel. As a corrective action taken in September, two months into trial recruitment and with around 1000 participants already enrolled, quality assurance checklists were updated with instructions for staff to remove drug assignments from charts.

In a recording of a meeting in late September2020 between Jackson and two directors a Ventavia executive can be heard explaining that the company wasn’t able to quantify the types and number of errors they were finding when examining the trial paperwork for quality control. “In my mind, it’s something new every day,” a Ventavia executive says. “We know that it’s significant.”

Ventavia was not keeping up with data entry queries, shows an email sent by ICON, the contract research organisation with which Pfizer partnered on the trial. ICON reminded Ventavia in a September 2020 email: “The expectation for this study is that all queries are addressed within 24hrs.” ICON then highlighted over 100 outstanding queries older than three days in yellow. Examples included two individuals for which “Subject has reported with Severe symptoms/reactions … Per protocol, subjects experiencing Grade 3 local reactions should be contacted. Please confirm if an UNPLANNED CONTACT was made and update the corresponding form as appropriate.” According to the trial protocol a telephone contact should have occurred “to ascertain further details and determine whether a site visit is clinically indicated.”

Worries over FDA inspection

Documents show that problems had been going on for weeks. In a list of “action items” circulated among Ventavia leaders in early August 2020, shortly after the trial began and before Jackson’s hiring, a Ventavia executive identified three site staff members with whom to “Go over e-diary issue/falsifying data, etc.” One of them was “verbally counseled for changing data and not noting late entry,” a note indicates.

At several points during the late September meeting Jackson and the Ventavia executives discussed the possibility of the FDA showing up for an inspection (box 1). “We’re going to get some kind of letter of information at least, when the FDA gets here . . . know it,” an executive stated. (See link for article)

Important excerpt:

Since Jackson reported problems with Ventavia to the FDA in September 2020, Pfizer has hired Ventavia as a research subcontractor on four other vaccine clinical trials (covid-19 vaccine in children and young adults, pregnant women, and a booster dose, as well an RSV vaccine trial; NCT04816643, NCT04754594, NCT04955626, NCT05035212). The advisory committee for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is set to discuss the covid-19 paediatric vaccine trial on 2 November.

Speaking off the record, other employees confirmed that the fired employee’s concerns were valid:
  • “Everything that you complained about was spot on.”
  • “I don’t think it was clean data. It’s a crazy mess.”
  • “I’ve never had to do what they were asking me to do, ever, It just seemed like something a little different from normal—the things that were allowed and expected.”
  • One employee with over 4-dozen clinical trials under her belt said she had never experienced such a “helter skelter” work environment.
  • Ventavia lacked enough employees to test trial participants who reported COVID-like symptoms, which is important because symptomatic COVID was the trial’s primary endpoint.  An FDA review showed that swabs were not taken from 477 people with suspected COVID.

____________________

For more on Pfizer’s corruption:

https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/shows/doctors-and-scientists-with-brian-hooker-phd  Video Here from Oct. 28, 2021

Live Every Thursday at 9:00a.m. PT, 11:00a.m. CT, 12:00p.m. ET

Got Science? Are you sure?

‘Doctors And Scientists’ With Brian Hooker, PHD.

Dr. Brian Hooker invites some of the leading voices in science and medicine to break down the studies and weigh in on the controversies so the rest of us have an opportunity to understand the science that drives public health policy and medical progress.

See previous episodes within link as well.

For more:

Category:

Activism, research, Treatment, vaccines, Viruses

PCR Proven An Unmitigated Disaster: Italy Reduces its COVID-19 Death Number by 97%. We Tried to Warn You

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/pcr-proven-an-unmitigated-disaster

PCR Proven An Unmitigated Disaster: Italy Reduces its COVID-19 Death Number by 97%. We Tried to Warn You.

The US is hellbent toward chronic worklosses of historic proportions.

James Lyons Weiler

Nov. 2, 2021

Since March, 2020, I’ve been sounding the alarm on the misuse of PCR test results as a proxy for a diagnosis of COVID-19, the disease caused by a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Based on first principles, it was clear to me then that the false positive rate of PCR conducted at high cycle threshold values would lead to far more false positive than true positive test results, leading to the lockdown that eventually happened.

OSHA is about to drop a rule that requires employees in companies with more than 100 workers to submit to a vaccination, or to tested and to mask in the workplace – and there will undoubtedly be a fourth wave when people start testing en masse.

Now, due to the realization that the “died with = died from” paradigm is dependent on the accuracy of the “with” part – which depends largely on PCR test kits. Given the use of high threshold values for “diagnosis” of COVID-19, the rates of cases and deaths have been grossly exaggerated. The evidence is so overwhelming – and coming in from all sources (except the US CDC) that Italy has revised its estimated number of deaths from COVID-19 from over 390,000 to less than 4,000 – overnight.

This means the US is poised for mayhem and chaos.

Fact checkers criticized IPAK for publishing information on the utterly flawed paradigm – and they were proven wrong.

Now, unless OSHA backs down from requiring vaccination or testing, which of course presumes:

  1. the safety of the vaccine (very much in question)
  2. that only unvaccinated persons can spread COVID-19 in the workplace (absolutely false)
  3. that routine, repeated, widespread asymptomatic testing won’t lead to a flood of chronic false positives (impossible)

The OSHA rule will lead to workloss at companies that follow their directive – and the worklosses will be of historic proportion.

Dr. Sin Hang Lee, MD points out that this is not the first time reliance on PCR test results as a proxy for medical diagnosis has led to disastrous results.

Mark Schiffman of the NCI on PCR HPV testing, which leads to >95% unnecessary colposcopic biopsies on hundreds of thousands of healthy women each year.  Lee pointed out (personal communication) this passage from Schiffman and colleague:

“Most HPV infections are benign, and over-reacting clinically to HPV positivity can cause psychological and possible iatrogenic physical (e.g., obstetrical) harm. We describe the built-in false positives in current tests, and the real harm that can result when the meaning of such false positive HPV tests is misunderstood. We suggest steps that could reduce harm being done by flawed tests and excessive clinical responses to positive HPV testing.”

We’re already poised for hyperinflation due to the harmful effects of the repeated stimulus payments based on printed money. When the economic shit hits the fan due to worklosses across the companies, well, I tried. Again, I’ve been at this since March, 2020, and others quickly followed suit. It is with no pleasure that I report to the skeptics: We tried to warn you.

I cannot convey the urgency with which we all must act to stop the OSHA rule from dropping. CALL YOUR SENATORS NOW.

_________________

**Comment**

I don’t need to tell Lyme/MSIDS patients that testing has worked in the reverse for tick-borne illness.  While false-positives are extremely high for COVID and HPV, testing for Lyme and coinfections is nearly always negative, an injustice that’s been going on for over 40 years and shows no sign of changing.  Further, the CDC has actively suppressed more accurate testing, and one researcher is suing it for using its regulatory power to block widespread application of a highly reliable direct DNA test and for channeling public funds to promote its own patented, but immature indirect metabolomics technology for Lyme disease diagnosis, a technology known to be prone to false positives.

For more on mortality:

For more on testing:

Category:

Activism, Testing, vaccines, Viruses

“We See Clotting – NOT From Virus, but From Spike From ‘Vaccine’ Itself” & CDC Finally Weighs in On Natural Immunity

https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/2/frontlinenews/we-see-clotting-not-from-virus-but-from-spike-from-vaccine-itself-aflds-medical-director-dr-ryan-cole/  Video Here (Approx. 1 Min)

‘We see clotting – not from virus, but from spike from vaccine itself’: AFLDS Medical Director Dr Ryan Cole

October 20, 2021

It doesn’t get much clearer than this.

These are not vaccines but clot shots.

__________________

https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2021/11/01/what-works-better-vaccines-or-natural-immunity/

CDC finds immunity from vaccines is more consistent than from infection, but both last at least six months

Naturally acquired immunity is at the center of a political fight over President Biden’s vaccine mandates.

It’s a question that scientists have been trying to answer since the start of the pandemic, one that is central to the rancorous political debates over coronavirus vaccine policies: How much immunity does someone have after recovering from a coronavirus infection, and how does it compare with immunity provided by vaccination?

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has weighed in for the first time in a detailed science report released with little fanfare Friday evening. Reviewing scores of research studies and its own unpublished data, the agency found that both infection-induced and vaccine-induced immunity are durable for at least six months — but that vaccines are more consistent in their protection and offer a huge boost in antibodies for people previously infected. (See link for article)

_________________

**Comment**

Did you honestly believe the CDC would ever admit in 1,000 years that natural immunity is broader, more robust, and more effective than their dangerous, experimental, ineffective, unneeded lucrative shots (that aren’t vaccines), and that history and 15 studies clearly demonstrate?  Even a former CDC director points out the complete bias against natural immunity by stating that the FDA, without presenting any data, issued a public safety statement:

“while SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests play an important role in identifying people who have been exposed to the SARS-CoV-2 virus and may have developed an adaptive immune response, antibody tests should not be used to determine immunity or protection against COVID-19.”

Huh?

So it’s fine to use inaccurate tests to inflate COVID cases and deaths, but it’s not fine to use them to prove immunity. It’s also fine to change testing perimeters for the “vaccinated,” to make it appear they are not getting infected with COVID, when “breakthough” infections are common due to vulnerability to variants.  The“vaxxed” are being damaged from the injections, and even die from COVID. People are also dying due to the ineffective “Fauci protocol,”with some stating that “hospitals are modern day killing fields.” Despite Fauci are fed up with his filibustering.

Our corrupt public health ‘authorities’ happily spend your tax-dollars on grotesque Frankenstein, and dangerous research while continuing to make up science, bully dissenters, move goal-posts, change perimeters, and definitions, and lie with statistics without any oversight, to continue their narrative.

Remember, NIH developed the spike protein, which goes systemic in the body, crosses the blood, brain barrier, and has been determined to be a dangerous toxin. Also, remember our government is a vaccine manufacturer, completely in bed with Big Pharma.  It is also worth repeating that the U.S. federal government partially owns an mRNA COVID-19 “vaccine” and soon before their rollout the U.S. federal government ensured COVID-19 mRNA vaccines would be legal by changing the definition of vaccines to include mRNA technology.  This change occurred just weeks before the first “cases” broke out in the U.S. Mandates would have been much harder to impose without this change.  Coincidence?

Epidemiologists estimate over 160 million people worldwide have recovered from COVID-19. Those who have recovered have an astonishingly low frequency of repeat infection, disease, or death. Immunity from prior infection protects – plain and simple. Regarding the injections; however, one expert states:

It’s worrisome that vaccination appears to deplete neutralizing Abs against the Spike protein gained by infection. It’s puzzling that vaccination appears also to deplete neutralizing Abs against the RBD (receptor-binding-domain) SARS-CoV-2 protein because the vaccines do not target that protein.  – James Lyons Weiler

Further, governments are bound by Pfizer’s lucrative but secret indemnification agreement for which they must:

  • acknowledge efficacy and risks are unknown
  • put up sovereign assets and military bases
  • promise to not penalize Pfizer for deliver delays
  • exempt Pfizer from all civil liability
  • pay for everything (all damages, lawsuits, losses, penalties, fines, settlements, attorney’s fees, costs and expenses)
  • not apply domestic laws to the company
  • protect Pfizer against intellectual property theft, while they are free to use anyone else’s intellectual property
  • keep everything a secret for 10 years

It’s crystal clear why our government is censoring, maligning, and denying effective treatments for COVID and pushing the need for a “shot in every arm.” They have nothing to lose (except lives) and everything to gain.  It’s also crystal clear why they downplay natural immunity, and the fact mortality from COVID is similar to the yearly flu.  These inconvenient facts would cause “vaccine” hesitancy, and they can’t have that.  Meanwhile, they completely ignore the vast devastation from lockdowns, fearmongering, and the “Fauci protocol.”

The following has billowed out (and continues to billow):

Vaccines are approved without proper safety studies, and nobody knows the effects of the cumulative effect of getting multiple vaccines. Many do not realize that Bill Gates, while pushing vaccines around the world that have caused hundreds of thousands of girls from India to be sterilized, doesn’t vaccinate his own children.

How many more whistleblowers will it take?  When will people realize we are in the biggest propaganda scheme in history?

For more:

Category:

Activism, Treatment, vaccines, Viruses

58% of Infant Deaths Reported to VAERS Occurred Within 3 Days of Vaccination, Research Shows & ‘This is Really a Giant Experiment’

58% of Infant Deaths Reported to VAERS Occurred Within 3 Days of Vaccination, Research Shows

By  Brian Hooker, Ph.D., P.E.

© [8/3/21] Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

In a new research paper published in the journal Toxicology Reports, author Neil Z. Miller found that out of a total of 2,605 infant deaths reported to VAERS between 1990 and 2019, 58% occurred within three days of vaccination, and 78% occurred within seven days of vaccination.

In a new research paper published in the journal Toxicology Reports, author Neil Z. Miller reports on the relationship between sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) death and the timing of vaccination, based on the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) database.

SIDS is defined as the sudden and unexpected death of an infant that remains unexplained after a thorough investigation. Although there are no specific symptoms associated with SIDS, an autopsy often reveals congestion and edema of the lungs and inflammatory changes in the respiratory system, according to the National Center for Health Statistics Vital Statistics of the United States 1988, Volume II, Mortality, Part A, Public Health Service, 1991.

Prior to contemporary vaccination programs, SIDS — sometimes referred to as “crib death” — was so infrequent it was not mentioned in infant mortality statistics.

After the national immunization campaigns were initiated in the U.S. in the 1960s, for the first time in history, most U.S. infants were required to receive several doses of DPT, polio, measles, mumps and rubella vaccines.

Shortly after, in 1969, medical certifiers presented a new medical term — sudden infant death syndrome.

In 1973, the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics added a new cause-of-death category — SIDS — to the World Health Organization’s International Classification of Diseases (ICD).

By 1980, SIDS had become the leading cause of postneonatal mortality (deaths of infants from 28 days to one year old) in the U.S.

As Miller points out in his article, the ICD category for vaccine-related death, or cause of death as “prophylactic inoculation and vaccination,” was eliminated when the ICD was revised in 1979 — despite the fact that this information would be useful in trying to understand the relationship between vaccination and death.

But Miller, a medical research journalist and the director of the Thinktwice Global Vaccine Institute, provides an alternative route for establishing such a correlation — by observing the temporal relationship between vaccines and reported infant deaths, including SIDS deaths, in the CDC’s VAERS database.

Miller found that out of a total of 2,605 infant deaths reported to VAERS from 1990 through 2019, the majority “clustered” in close temporal proximity to vaccination — 58% occurred within three days of vaccination, and 78% occurred within seven days of vaccination.

Miller found the excess deaths within these ranges were statistically significant (p<0.00001), meaning the chance that this result is random is less than 0.001%.

The same type of clustering was present in the 1,048 reports of infant deaths (out of the total 2,605) reported to VAERS specifically as SIDS.

According to Miller, if there were no correlation between vaccination and infant deaths, one would expect to see an even spacing of deaths within the time range reported prior to vaccination —- not a clustering of deaths as Miller found.

Miller included a comprehensive literature review in his paper refuting the “official” claim that the SIDS epidemic was curtailed by having infants sleep on their backs — as recommended by the “Back to Sleep” campaign, initiated in 1992 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.

The subsequent rate of SIDS dropped by an annual average of 8.6% between 1992 and 2001. However, the neonatal mortality rate due to “suffocation in bed” increased during that same time at an average annual rate of 11.2%.

Other similar causes of infant death also increased significantly during this period, as reported by Miller. Further, from 1999 through 2015, the U.S. SIDS rate declined 35.8%. while infant deaths due to accidental suffocation increased 183.8 %.

Miller also affirms his main results from the paper (i.e., the temporal clustering of SIDS deaths with vaccination) through the discussion of seven additional peer-reviewed studies and two confidential reports.

On average, these authors found that substantial proportions of infant deaths occurred within one day (mean = 25%), three days (mean = 49%) and seven days (mean = 71%) post-vaccination, matching the results of the present study.

Mechanistically, vaccine injury has been tied to SIDS multiple times. Matturri et al. (2014) examined 13 SIDS deaths occurring within seven days of a hexavalent vaccine.  Analysis of the brainstem and cerebellum of the deceased infants showed brain edema and congestion in all victims.

The authors hypothesized that “several compounds and immuno-potentiation adjuvants of the hexavalent vaccine might easily go beyond the blood-brain barrier, which in the first year of life is still immature and quite permeable, inducing neuronal molecular alterations in DNA, RNA and proteins of brainstem neurons regulating vital functions, with consequent fatal disorganization of respiratory control in particularly predisposed infants.”

Specifically, these authors implicated aluminum-based adjuvants in the dysregulation of respiratory control.

Scheibner and Karlsson (1991) monitored infant breathing during sleep before and after the DPT vaccination, revealing an increase in episodes where breathing nearly ceased or stopped completely. These episodes, which continued for several weeks post-vaccination, were not seen prior to vaccination.

Despite the official insistence that SIDS deaths are not caused by vaccination, as Miller points out, the National Vaccine Injury Compensation (NVICP) is set up to compensate families of individuals who are injured and/or die from vaccine administration.

Death from vaccination is compensated with $250,000 for “pain and suffering” to family members of the deceased victim. Conditions typically leading to death that are considered “table injuries” to be compensated under the NVICP include anaphylaxis and encephalopathy or encephalitis.

‘Healthy babies just don’t die for no apparent reason’

Kari Bundy, who lost her son after his four-month vaccinations, said she’s always been “flabbergasted” at the denial of the medical community of the link between SIDS and vaccines. “For me, it was too obvious to even attempt to ignore,” Bundy said.

Bundy lost her third-born child, Mason, in 2011.

“A few days after his routine four-month vaccinations, my husband and I discovered his dead body in the middle of the night, laying on his side, his body still warm,” Bundy said

Mason’s autopsy came back “unremarkable,” aside from some thymic petechiae, which is the most common gross finding in SIDS cases at autopsy.

“I was assured time and time again that he had not suffocated,” Bundy said.

When Mason died, Bundy learned if you can’t pay for a funeral, you can’t have one. So a few months after Mason’s death, she founded a nonprofit called Mason’s Cause, to provide grants to cover funeral costs for families who had experienced the loss of a child under the age of 1.

“I never wanted any parent to experience this devastating loss and not be able to bury their child,” Bundy said. She continued running the charity for just under 2 years, during which time she worked with 94 different families who experienced the death of a child under age 1.

Of those 94 infant deaths, 87 died from SIDS, or from causes “unknown.” Of the SIDS cases, 81 — or 93% — died within seven days of routine vaccinations.

“When I realized SIDS seemed to be undeniably related to vaccines, I realized I could no longer dedicate my life to running a charity that would help bury babies,” Bundy said. “That’s when I realized I wanted to save babies by speaking out about the real risks of vaccination.”

Bundy, who works for Children’s Health Defense as translations coordinator, said she’s grateful for research like Miller’s because it shows what she and all SIDS parents already knew — healthy babies don’t just die for no apparent reason.

Listen to the interview with Neil Miller, author of the study of SIDS and vaccines, on the “Right on Point” Podcast by clicking on top link.

________________

https://www.theblaze.com/news/ben-carson-covid-vaccinations-children-giant-experiment

Dr. Ben Carson blasts COVID vaccinations for children: ‘This is really a giant experiment’

Sarah Taylor, November 01, 2021
Excerpt from article:
“Plus, we don’t know what the long-term impact of these vaccines is, so this is really sort of a giant experiment,” Carson explained. “Do we want to put our children at risk, when we know that the risk of the disease to them is relatively small, but we don’t know what the future risks are? Why would we do a thing like that? It makes no sense whatsoever.” Dr. Ben Carson

For more:

Category:

Activism, research, vaccines