Dr. Aseem Malhotra, a British Cardiologist, discusses the recent American Heart Association study linking COVID-19 shots to increased heart attacks.
He shares that British authorities in the field of Cardiology confirm that this is happening, but they are afraid to go public because they will lose their research funding from the Drug Companies.
The article points out that this is not Dr. Aseem Malhotra’s first rodeo. He has been featured multiple times over the years at Health Impact News because he is one of the few doctors worldwide that is not afraid of exposing the fraud in the pharmaceutical industry, as he has exposed the false lipid theory of heart disease that claims cholesterol causes heart disease which then created a 100 billion dollar cholesterol-lowering drug business led by Pfizer.
He is calling for an immediate end to vaccine mandates.
Using the PULS cardiac test, researchers have found Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID shots dramatically increase biomarkers associated with thrombosis, cardiomyopathy and other vascular events following vaccination
Pre- and post-injection PULS tests for 566 patients were compared. On average, their PULS scores went from an 11% five-year risk for acute coronary syndrome, to a more than double, 25%, five-year risk
Those who got the injection for fear that COVID-19 might adversely affect their heart now face the grim reality that they’ve exchanged a potential risk for a more certain one
Another paper details how the mRNA shot can cause thrombocytopenia (low platelet count) through a mechanism that involves the activation of platelets by antibodies against the spike protein (anti-spike antibodies)
A mystery that remains to be solved is why only certain people with antibodies to the spike protein (anti-spike antibodies) go on to develop symptoms of platelet activation and thrombocytopenia. One hypothesis is that only a subset of the anti-spike antibodies formed after vaccination can activate platelets and cause thrombocytopenia
Excerpts from article:
In a November 21, 2021, tweet, cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra writes:1
“Extraordinary, disturbing, upsetting. We now have evidence of a plausible biological mechanism of how mRNA vaccine may be contributing to increased cardiac events. The abstract is published in the highest impact cardiology journal so we must take these findings very seriously.”
Signs and Symptoms to Watch For
ACS (Acute Coronary Syndrome) is an umbrella term that doesn’t just include heart attacks, but also a range of other conditions involving abruptly reduced blood flow to your heart. Signs and symptoms of ACS typically begin very suddenly, and include:5
Chest pain/discomfort, often described as aching, pressure, tightness or burning sensations
Pain that radiates from your chest to your shoulders, arms, upper abdomen, back, neck and/or jaw
Nausea and/or vomiting
Indigestion
Shortness of breath
Sudden heavy sweating
Lightheadedness, dizziness and/or fainting
Unusual or inexplicable fatigue
Restlessness and/or apprehensiveness
If you suspect ACS, do not drive yourself to the hospital. Call for an ambulance, as it is a true medical emergency that may need prompt medical attention. (See link for full article)
_________________
Lastly, Dr. Mercola discusses “vaccine”-induced thrombocytopenia, or low platelet count, caused by antibodies against the spike protein, resulting in depletion of platelets by activating them. Platelet activation can lead to DIC (disseminated intramuscular coagulation), exhausting the coagulation system causing the low platelets which in turn causes hemorrhaging. Dr. Hoffe states that after testing those who got the shots with a D-dimer test, at least 62% had microscopic blood clotting.
As of November, there were over four thousand cases reported to VAERS, which is notoriously low at capturing adverse events so the true numbers are much, much higher.
The fact the whistleblowers don’t want to publish their paper for fear of losing money obtained from Big Pharma should concern us all. When money replaces lives, we know we are in a bad place.
Five Studies on mRNA Vaccine Spike Protein Pathogenicity. Share With Your Doctor.
Ignore the “Fact Checker” Opinion Web Sites. Here’s a Collection of Resources on Spike Protein Pathogenicity for Your Use. Add Your Own in the Comments.
Don’t believe the opinion blog article websites that tout themselves as “Fact-Checkers” when all they do is cite so-called “experts” who offer zero evidence and only provide their subjective, and in many cases, misleading, opinions.
This is a short collection of studies that show that they SARS-CoV-2 spike protein itself pathogenic. These are just a sample. Remember: putting a spike protein into the human body by injection does not magically change its ability to cause disease: pathogenicity.
“Our in vitro V(D)J reporter assay shows that the spike protein intensely impeded V(D)J recombination.” Jiang & Mei, 2021.
“The data presented here indicate the need of a strict and thorough clinical surveillance on the future effects of the mass vaccination against the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.” Kanduc, 2021 (Lyons-Weiler, 2020 was first to conclude the Spike protein was autoreactogenic – and likely to affect the heart protein Titin.)
“Researchers created a “pseudovirus” that was surrounded by SARS-CoV-2 classic crown of spike proteins, but did not contain any actual virus. Exposure to this pseudovirus resulted in damage to the lungs and arteries of an animal model—proving that the spike protein alone was enough to cause disease. Tissue samples showed inflammation in endothelial cells lining the pulmonary artery walls.” (Salk.edu). (Lei et al., 2021)
“In conclusion, these experiments reveal that Spike-induced degradation of endothelial junctional proteins affects endothelial barrier function and is the likely cause of vascular damage observed in COVID-19 affected individuals.”(Raghavan et al, 2021). (Okamoto and Suzuki, 2017 for the importance of intact endothelial junctions.)
“We show that intravenously injected radioiodinated S1 (I-S1) readily crossed the blood–brain barrier in male mice, was taken up by brain regions and entered the parenchymal brain space. I-S1 was also taken up by the lung, spleen, kidney and liver.” (Rhea et al., 2021)
Have additional studies? Help a scientific out – drop them in the comments with a quote from the study w/their conclusions. Have a doctor? Give them a gift subscription, and I’ll keep these articles coming.
Jiang H, Mei YF. SARS-CoV-2 Spike Impairs DNA Damage Repair and Inhibits V(D)J Recombination In Vitro. Viruses. 2021 Oct 13;13(10):2056. doi: 10.3390/v13102056. PMID: 34696485; PMCID: PMC8538446. https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/10/2056
Lei Y, Zhang J, Schiavon CR, He M, Chen L, Shen H, Zhang Y, Yin Q, Cho Y, Andrade L, Shadel GS, Hepokoski M, Lei T, Wang H, Zhang J, Yuan JX, Malhotra A, Manor U, Wang S, Yuan ZY, Shyy JY. SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Impairs Endothelial Function via Downregulation of ACE 2. Circ Res. 2021 Apr 30;128(9):1323-1326. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318902. Epub 2021 Mar 31. PMID: 33784827; PMCID: PMC8091897. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8091897/pdf/res-128-1323.pdf
Raghavan S, Kenchappa DB, Leo MD. SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Induces Degradation of Junctional Proteins That Maintain Endothelial Barrier Integrity. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Jun 11;8:687783. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.687783. PMID: 34179146; PMCID: PMC8225996. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2021.687783/full
Okamoto T, Suzuki K. The Role of Gap Junction-Mediated Endothelial Cell-Cell Interaction in the Crosstalk between Inflammation and Blood Coagulation. Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Oct 27;18(11):2254. doi: 10.3390/ijms18112254. PMID: 29077057; PMCID: PMC5713224. https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/18/11/2254
Rhea EM, Logsdon AF, Hansen KM, Williams LM, Reed MJ, Baumann KK, Holden SJ, Raber J, Banks WA, Erickson MA. The S1 protein of SARS-CoV-2 crosses the blood-brain barrier in mice. Nat Neurosci. 2021 Mar;24(3):368-378. doi: 10.1038/s41593-020-00771-8. Epub 2020 Dec 16. PMID: 33328624. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-020-00771-8.pdf
For the past three decades public health officials have been propagating a false Lyme disease narrative; Lyme disease is “hard to catch and easily treated” with a 2–4-week IDSA mandated treatment protocol.
Anyone who finds this difficult to believe I suggest you read my 2017 letter to Brenda Fitzgerald, MD former director of the CDC. That letter was sent to all of Fitzgerald’s predecessors with absolutely no response whatsoever from the CDC.
You may also want to review my June 2020 letter to the editor of the BMJ which exposes evidence of persistent infection (chronic Lyme) after extensive antibiotic treatment:
I have been calling for a congressional investigation into the mishandling of Lyme disease for the past TEN years with over 97,000 signatures from this petition alone.
It would appear that history repeats itself as we have yet another false narrative with the current pandemic once again propagated by our “trusted” public health officials.
As I mention in the letter below, “the world is getting a first-hand look at what our public health officials are capable of when there is no oversight and no one is ever held accountable” -Carl Tuttle
Letter to a NH State Representative regarding HR 4980 which would restrict travel without a jab passport.
———- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: NH State Representative
Date: 11/23/2021 8:23 AM
Subject: Re: Freedom to Travel
Dear Rep ******,
Thank you for taking the time to respond to the petition!
Instead of trying to fight off one draconian measure after another isn’t it time we (our legislators) start questioning the narrative; “COVID vaccines are safe and effective”
As of Nov 12, 2021 there have been 18,853 Deaths, 30,010 Permanent Disabilities and 658 Birth Defects following vaccination as reported though the HHS Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). You can click on the following link for verification as it is updated weekly:
I would like to call attention to the following website which was created by individuals who are pro-vaccine and took the recommended vaccines for COVID-19 but after experiencing serious injury they have been left to fend for themselves: (similar to the chronic Lyme patient population)
We are a large and ever growing group of Americans who were previously healthy and have been seriously injured by the COVID vaccines (Pfizer, Moderna, J&J as well as Astra Zeneca in the clinical trial stage in the United States).
We are pro-vaccine, pro-science and were excited for the opportunity to be vaccinated and to do our part in helping to end the pandemic.
We are completely independent of any other organization.
At this point, there’s an overwhelming amount of evidence showing the COVID shots are not working. What little protection you do get clearly wanes within a handful of months, and may leave you worse off than you were before. We’re seeing data to this effect from a number of different places.
In the U.S., we can now look at Vermont. [19] At nearly 72% vaccinated, it has the highest rate of “fully vaccinated” residents in the country, according to ABC News, [20] yet COVID cases are now suddenly surging to new heights.
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data show Vermont had the 12th highest COVID case rate in the nation as of November 9, 2021.Over the previous seven days, cases had increased by 42%. It couldn’t have been due to a surge in testing, though, as the weekly average of tests administered had only increased by 9% in that time.
What’s more, during that first week of November, the hospital admission rate for patients who were fully vaccinated increased by 8%, while the admission rate for those who were not fully vaccinated actually decreased by 15%.
Data from physician assistant Deborah Conrad shows vaccinated people are nine times more likely to be hospitalized than the unvaccinated.
Keep in mind that you’re not considered “fully vaccinated” until two weeks after your second injection. If you got your second dose a week ago and end up in the hospital with COVID symptoms, you’re counted as unvaccinated. This gross manipulation of reality makes it very difficult to interpret the data, but even with this manipulation it is beyond obvious that the vaccines are failing.
Overall, the case rate in Vermont is FAR higher now than it as in the fall of 2020, when no one had gotten the “vaccine.” According to Vermont health commissioner Dr. Mark Levine, the surge is occurring primarily among unvaccinated people in their 20s and children aged 5 through 11 — a curious coincidence, seeing how the shots are just now being rolled out for 5- to 11-year-olds.
Levine blames the surge on the highly infectious delta variant, but delta has been around for months already. The first case of delta in Vermont was identified in mid-May 2021. [21] Surely, it wouldn’t have taken six months for this most-infectious of variants to make the rounds and cause an unprecedented spike?
Two clues are given by Levine, however, when he admits that a) Vermont has one of the lowest rates of natural immunity in the U.S. and b) protection is waning among those who got the COVID shot early to mid-year. Breakthrough cases among the fully vaccinated shot up 31% during the first week of November. [22]
Fully Vaxxed Are Nine Times More Likely To Be Hospitalized
Coincidentally, data from physician assistant Deborah Conrad, presented by attorney Aaron Siri [23] October 17, 2021, shows vaccinated people are nine times more likely to be hospitalized than the unvaccinated.
The key, however, was in what they counted as vaccinated. Rather than only including those who had gotten the shot two weeks or more before being hospitalized, they simply counted those who had one or more shots, regardless of when, as vaccinated. This gives us an honest accounting, finally! As explained by Siri: [24]
“A concerned Physician Assistant, Deborah Conrad, convinced her hospital to carefully track the COVID-19 vaccination status of every patient admitted to her hospital. The result is shocking.
As Ms. Conrad has detailed, her hospital serves a community in which less than 50% of the individuals were vaccinated for COVID-19 but yet, during the same time period, approximately 90% of the individuals admitted to her hospital were documented to have received this vaccine.
These patients were admitted for a variety of reasons, including but not limited to COVID-19 infections. Even more troubling is that there were many individuals who were young, many who presented with unusual or unexpected health events, and many who were admitted months after vaccination.”
Despite these troubling findings, health authorities ignored Conrad when she reached out. In mid-July 2021, Siri’s law firm also sent formal letters to the CDC, the Health and Human Services Department and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration on Conrad’s behalf, [25] and those were ignored as well.
“This again highlights the importance of never permitting government coercion and mandates when it comes to medical procedures,” Siri writes.[26]
Now, one of the most shocking details gleaned from Conrad’s data collection, which Siri failed to make clear but Steve Kirsch highlights in a recent substack post is that: [27]
“The only way you can get those numbers is if vaccinated people are 9 times more likely to be hospitalized than unvaccinated. It is mathematically impossible to get to those numbers any other way. Period. Full stop. This is known as an ‘inconvenient truth.’”
Indeed, the more data we gain access to, the worse it looks for these COVID shots. Unfortunately, those who push them seem hell-bent on ignoring any and all data that don’t support their stance.
Worse, it seems data and statistics are being intentionally manipulated by our health authorities to present a false picture of safety and effectiveness. All such tactics are indefensible at this point, and people who believe the official narrative without doing their own research do so at their own risk.
____________________________________
Rep ******… The Tuttle family’s horrifying and disabling experience with Lyme disease has given us reason to question everything our public health officials are propagating as we have seen how persistent Lyme infection has been denied for three decades. Now the world is getting a first-hand look at what our public health officials are capable of when there is no oversight and no one is ever held accountable.
COVID-19 and ‘Conspiracy Theory’: Who Decides What’s ‘Misinformation’?
The media dismisses any questioning of the lockdown measures as “conspiracy theory,” but we are the final judge of how the authorities managed the COVID-19 response.
During this time of COVID-19, the term “conspiracy theory” has been bandied about too casually by mainstream media sources. We indeed live in an “age of misinformation,” a time when it is legitimately hard to tell what exactly is true and what is not. But during this time, how do we make sense of the non-stop flood of contradictory COVID-19 information? And what do we make of alleged COVID-19 conspiracies?
Seldom do the media acknowledge that “conspiracy theory” can become weaponized, the charge becoming a means to stifle free inquiry into a topic. Who decides between valid information versus misinformation? And who decides what distinguishes a conspiracy theory from real political or financial agenda?
The mainstream media, often acting in concert with business or government, have decided it is their responsibility to be the official purveyors of news, the anointed ones to tell you what is authoritative versus what is not; and they have decided to tell you what stories constitute conspiracy theories. (See link for article)
_____________________
**Comment**
Excellent read – highly recommend.
The author states there are important questions to be asked of each author or “authority” including:
What is a ‘conspiracy?’
To conspire means to “join in a secret agreement to do an unlawful or wrongful act or an act which becomes unlawful as a result of the secret agreement.” These happen continually and the author mentions many that were investigated and exposed.
A conspiracy theory is a “theory that explains an event or set of circumstances as a result of a conspiracy.” Not a neutral label, this term can be weaponized to prevent investigation and free-speech by branding it as untrue or based on insufficient evidence, superstition, or prejudice. It functions as a form of character assassination to discredit dissenters. Power-holders weaponize the term to shape the narrative and resist opposition. BTW: Lyme/MSIDS has been widely shaped by power-holders who stifle legitimate scientific inquiry. The current narrative has been spun for over 40 years.
12 Questions to Help You Assess Claims of Conspiracy Theory
Are there any uses of logical fallacies or rhetorical devices present in defending the “official narrative”?
Ad hominem arguments: attacking the character, motives, or attributes of a person or group without attacking the substance of the logical argument.
Red herring/deflection: information that deliberately misleads or distracts
Strawman: distortion the dissenter’s position to give an impression of refuting it
Non-sequitur: stating a series of facts and then deriving a conclusion that does not follow the facts.
Cherry-picking: bringing up data which supports a particular position while ignoring contradictory data
Begging the question:presuming the conclusion to be true, instead of providing proof.
Appeal to authority: using an authority figure to claim truth without evidence for it.
Lie by omission: lying by either omitting certain facts or by failing to correct a misconception.
What are the assertions made in the article that the author assumes “every reasonable person must believe”?
One must distangle half-truths and assumptions, especially assumptions that everyone who is logical or reasonable should believe.
Who benefits from the official narrative?
It’s imperative to identify power-holders and interests to determine how they might benefit from the narrative.
How accurate is the portrayal of the alternative narrative?
One trick deployed is to make the dominate narrative appear more favorable, and also to present the most extreme alternative to stop critical thinking and discussion.
Whose interests are harmed by the alternative narrative? Some useful questions to consider:
How large in dollars is the market relevant to the dominant players’ interests?
Does the alternative narrative damage any existing revenue lines of the existing players?
Does the alternative narrative change the environment in a way that would hurt the existing players?
Does the alternative narrative damage the ability of the existing players to influence society?
How credible is the alternative narrative?
You must examine the actual arguments/data for yourself. Weaponization works by convincing you that the probability of the alternative is so low it is unreasonable.
If the official narrative were untrue, what paradigms would this invalidate?
A paradigm is useful in clarifying reality, but it can blind us to observations that lie outside the paradigm’s explanatory realm. Again, Lyme/MSIDS is a perfect example.
Is there a political or ideological agenda being served? If so, what is this agenda?
You must separate fact from opinion and be alert for ideological biases. Mainstream media now is nothing more than editorializing. Be alert for intimidation & bullying and scientism which promotes & over-glorifies science. Fauci’s statement that anyone who questions him is questioning science comes to mind – setting both himself and science up as gods who know far more than you do.
What financial interests or power agenda is served by those propagating the narrative, and how large are these incentives?
How does the narrative financially benefit or give power to those behind the narrative?
Find data on how large the financial interests are: i.e. the COVID shots have already made billions of dollars for pharmaceuticals, and so there is tremendous incentive to downplay risks and prevent inquiry into adverse events.
Is the burden of proof applied equally for both sides?
It is suspicious when one side states the other side is wrong without evidence. Carefully examine the burden of proof as well as cherry-picking data to justify the position.
What first-hand evidence do we have for both sides?
Consult the evidence and sources to determine if the logic is sound. Media will cite a source but misrepresent the meaning to further the narrative. For example, a New York Times article made a case for the flu vaccine but deliberately ignored the modest conclusions over efficacyby the Cochrane Collaboration.
How likely are “alternative paradigms” to be true?
When presented with two sides, ascertain whether the dominant paradigm explains all the observed phenomena. If it doesn’t, the alternative must be considered and weighed.
The article then goes through some common COVID-19 conspiracies immediately refuted by main-stream media:
5G networks are making people sick, not Coronavirus.
The Reuter article debunking this conspiracy uses a strawman argument by presenting the extreme position as a binary one:you either believe the deaths are from 5G or COVID-19, but not both. The discussion of 5G being responsible for COVID deaths misses the more fundamental question: Does 5G exposure have negative health effects? This is a legitimate question whose diminishment benefits the beneficiaries of 5G technology. The article assumes and uses the appeal to authorities and consensus to insist it is safe. We have every right to hold authorities to a higher safety demonstration as it affects our lives. The article digs into the other issues as well and is well worth reading.
Snopes presents a series of non-sequiturs that appear to be authoritative facts but have nothing to do with the lab-origin hypothesis’s veracity and only serve as distractions. It uses biased characterization on an interview between Dr. Joseph Mercola and lawyer Francis Boyle. Several ad hominem fallacies are used to discredit both these men. It cites a Nature study and accompanying commentary by National Institute of Health director Francis Collins in which a different virus with a spike-binding protein adaption similar to the one used by SaRs-CoV-2 was found in Pangolins. Neither debunks the lab-origin hypothesis but merely presents another theory. There are lies of omission by failing to discuss material that would influence our judgment regarding what is plausible versus not. By cherry-picking facts and arguments, it influences the reader unfairly. They simply omit the gain-of-function research funded by the NIH on bats that was being done at the lab and that safety concerns were raised in 2018. U.S. Right to Know reported that “a statement in The Lancet authored by 27 prominent public health scientists condemning ‘conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin’ was organized by employees of EcoHealth Alliance.” This seems to be a deliberate public relations scheme to draw attention away from the lab-origin hypothesis. Dr. Anthony Fauci, NIAID director, would benefit from this hypothesis as it draws attention away from his funding role of the GOF research and potential culpability in case of a lab release. Further, much evidence was given in the article connecting the military to ‘gain of function’ research demonstrating a vested interest, which was completely ignored by Snopes.
Chicago Tribune’s “No, COVID-19 vaccines don’t contain Satan’s microchips (and other scary conspiracy theories aren’t true either)”
They give strawman and weaponized arguments by presenting a series of extreme views on supposedly a minority of “anti-vaccine” groups that they mock, rather than actual concerns. Anti-vax, and anti-vaccine is using language and social pressure to create an us-versus-them mentality. “Satan’s microchip” is also weaponized language and an ad hominem fallacy to mock digital surveillance concerns over a very real Gates partnership with MIT to store vaccination records in a ‘quantum dot’ in the skin which encodes information that is stored. The novel mRNA technology that will utilize the human body’s own cells to develop the antigen has never been used in humans before and was developed faster than any other vaccine in history. This fact makes it more akin to gene therapy than a traditional vaccine. There has been no long term safety studies. Experts have admitted there are unknown risks involved including autoimmunity. “Vaccine” manufacturers themselves warn that a certain subset of people will experience some adverse effects, including flu-like symptoms like muscle aches and fever. Other organizations have sounded a loud warning that the Chicago Tribune piece ignores, as well as the question of who decides if the risk/benefit calculation is worth it? The Chicago Tribune has decided this question for the reader.
The article also gives a complete list of references at the end.
Fantastic read full of crucial information to understand.
According to the President of Botswana, where this “variant” was first discovered, all four patients had been previously “vaccinated” for COVID.
All available evidence shows that Omicron is mild, but Fauci is busy spewing a false narrative by linking the unrelated wordssevere disease with Omicron variant. He states there’s every reason to “believe” boosters would give at least some degree of cross protection against a “wide range” of variants. There’s no data, no proof – just belief. Fauci‘s advicemutatesfaster than COVID.
The world faces more lockdowns, travel restrictions, and coerced vaccinations as the WHO announces (and thousands of media stories) the sudden appearance of a new, potentially deadly strain. What’s going on? Hear from one of the world’s leading experts on the topic, and dive deep into an uncensored discussion on the BeSovereign free speech platform.
“So after they create these ‘pseudo-viruses’ in the laboratory, they then interact them in a cell culture with different antibodies and that’s how they say that it’s more or less transmissible or more or less clinically severe or even that it might be resistant to the vaccine because they say the vaccine creates a certain antibody and they see how it binds with that antibody, right, and if it binds weakly with that antibody that the vaccine is supposed to create, then they say it’s going to be more severe, right, but it has nothing to do with what actually happened in any human being or any other organism, because they have never found these things in the real world. ~ Dr. Kaufman
“Since the era of molecular biology & molecular genetics, there’s been a lot of discovery of new knowledge. What happens is that all the experiments are done now in a petri dish rather than in living organisms, and it’s just always assumed that what happens in a petri dish explains what happens in a real organism, but that’s really a false assumption. Everything needs to be validated. You can look at antibodies and you can validate it, but that research actually hasn’t been done. ~ Dr. Kaufman
In his interview with Attorney Reiner Fuellmich last July, he explained how there are no variants of COVID-19. They are all computer simulations of specific gene sequences.
We extracted about 19 minutes of that interview and it is on our Bitchute channel.
At around the 14-minute mark of this video, Dr. Martin states:
There is no such thing as an alpha, or beta, or gamma delta variant. This is a means by which what is desperately sought is a degree to which individuals can be coerced into accepting something that they would not otherwise accept.
There has not been in any of the published studies in what has been reportedly the delta variant, there has not been a population “are not” calculated, which is the actual replication rate.
What has been estimated, are computer simulations.
There has been no ability to identify any clinically altered gene sequence, which then has a clinically expressed variation.
And this is the problem all along. This is the problem going back to very beginning of what’s alleged to be a pandemic, is that we do not have any evidence that the gene sequence alteration had any clinical significance whatsoever.
There has not been a single paper, published by anyone, that has actually established that anything novel since November of 2019 has clinical distinction from anything that predates November of 2019.
The problem with the 73 patents that I described, is that those 73 patents all contain what was reported to be novel in December and January of 2019 and 2020 respectively.
So the problem is that even if we were to accept that there are idiopathic pneumonias, even if we were to accept that are are some set of pathogen induced symptoms, we do not have a single piece of published evidence that tells us that anything about the subclades Sars-CoV-2 has clinical distinction from anything that was known and published prior to November 2019 in 73 patents dating to 2008.
There is no, and I am going to repeat this, there is no evidence that the Delta variant is somehow distinct from anything else GISAID.
The fact that we are now looking for a thing does not mean it is a thing, because we are looking at fragments of things, and the fact is that if we choose any fragment, I could come up with, you know, I could come up with variant “omega” tomorrow.
And I could come up with variant “omega” and I could say I’m looking for this sub strand of either DNA or RNA, or even a protein, and I could run around the world going “Oh my gosh! Fear the omega variant!”
And the problem is, that because of the nature of the way in which we currently sequence genomes, which is actually a compositing process, is what we call in mathematics an “inter-leaving,” we don’t have any point of reference that actually know whether or not the thing we are looking at is in fact distinct from either clinical or even genomic sense.
And so we’re trapped in a world where unfortunately, if you go and look, as I have, at the papers that isolated the Delta variant, and actually ask the question, is the Delta variant anything other than the selection of a sequence in a systematic shift of an already disclosed other sequence, the answer is, it’s just an alteration in when you start and stop what you call the reading frame.
Israel Simulates COVID-19 “War Game Omega Exercise” on November 11, 2021
Two weeks before this current new variant suddenly appeared in Africa and started making the news cycle, Israel, which has been Pfizer’s human laboratory to test their COVID shots, ran a “war games” simulation to prepare for a “deadly new variant” which at the time had not yet been named. They called this future variant “Omega,” and the simulation was carried out on November 11, 2021.
Dozens of top officials took part in what Prime Minister Naftali Bennett called a COVID-19 war exercise on Thursday to gauge the country’s preparedness for the next wave of the pandemic.
“We are starting an unprecedented event here,” the prime minister said at the start of the exercise – “not only on an Israeli scale but on a global level. We are conducting a war exercise to prepare for a new variant that does not even exist yet.”
The “Omega Exercise,” as Bennett called it, was held in the format of a “war game,” the Prime Minister’s Office said. Bennett has regularly referred to the “Omega strain,” the next harmful COVID-19 variant that has not yet been discovered. A war game is a game of the mind; no physical exercises took place.
Bennett said that Israel has surfaced from the Delta wave without locking down, proving that “with proper management, the pandemic can be defeated.” (Full article – and thanks to the Robin Monotti, Dr Mike Yeadon & Cory Morningstar Telegram Channel for pointing this out.)
Africa is Chosen to be the Source of the New Variant Scam
Up until now, Africa has been an enigma to the Globalists’ narrative on the COVID-19 plandemic, as the continent has the lowest rates of COVID-19 vaccination, while also having the fewest amounts of “COVID-19 deaths.”
Since the very beginning of the covid panic, the narrative has been this: implement severe lockdowns or your population will experience a bloodbath. Morgues will be overwhelmed, the death total toll will be astounding. On the other hand, we were assured those jurisdictions that do lock down would see only a fraction of the death toll.
Then, once vaccines became available, the narrative was modified to “Get shots in arms and then covid will stop spreading. Those countries without vaccines, on the other hand, will continue to face mass casualties.”
The lockdown narrative, of course, has already been thoroughly overturned. Jurisdictions that did not lock down or adopted only weak and short lockdowns ended up with covid death tolls that were either similar to—or even better than—death tolls in countries that adopted draconian lockdowns. Lockdown advocates said locked-down countries would be overwhelmingly better off. These people were clearly wrong.
Undaunted by the increasing implausibility of the lockdown narrative, the global health bureaucrats are nonetheless doubling down on forced vaccines—as we now see in Austria—and we continue to be assured that only countries with high vaccination rates can hope to avoid disastrous covid outcomes.
Yet, the experience in sub-Saharan Africa calls both these narratives into question: Africa’s numbers have been far, far lower than the experts warned would be the case.
For example, the AP reported this week that in spite of low vaccination rates, Africa has fared better than most of the world:
[T]here is something “mysterious” going on in Africa that is puzzling scientists, said Wafaa El-Sadr, chair of global health at Columbia University. “Africa doesn’t have the vaccines and the resources to fight COVID-19 that they have in Europe and the U.S., but somehow they seem to be doing better,” she said….
Fewer than 6% of people in Africa are vaccinated. For months, the WHO has described Africa as “one of the least affected regions in the world” in its weekly pandemic reports.
Yet disaster for Africa has long been predicted for several reasons even beyond the availability of vaccines. For instance, it is known that lockdowns are especially impractical in the poorest parts of the world.
Yet disaster for Africa has long been predicted for several reasons even beyond the availability of vaccines. For instance, it is known that lockowns are especially improactical in the poorest parts of the world.
This is because populations in places with undeveloped economies can’t simply sit at home and live off savings or debt. Rather, these people must go out into the world and earn a living on a day-to-day basis. Starvation is the alternative.
Moreover, much of this work is done in the informal economy, so enforcing lockdowns becomes especially difficult.
It was also assumed covid would be especially deadly in Africa due to the fact many large households live in small housing units.
But that “conventional wisdom” flies in the face of the reality of covid in Africa, which is that there have been fewer deaths. (Full article here.)
But this new fake variant has been reportedly found in South Africa, with the supposed first detections coming from Botswana. The variant now has a name, Omicron, and while the corporate media is hyping it up and creating fear over it, the people in Africa themselves are not concerned.
The new ‘Omicron’ variant of COVID-19 was first detected in four people who were fully vaccinated, according to a public statement by the Botswana government.
The new variant, which some claim is three times more contagious, was initially discovered in Botswana before it spread across South Africa.
The news was met with global alarm, prompting financial markets to plummet and new travel bans to be put in place.
According to a public statement by the Botswana government, the new mutation was first discovered in four people who had received both doses of the COVID-19 vaccine.
The Botswana Government says that the new COVID variant (named Omicron) was first detected in four patients who were FULLY VACCINATED for COVID. https://t.co/twfaWmK2Gu
According to the report, four cases of the new variant “were reported and recorded” on November 22.
“The preliminary report revealed that all the four had been completely vaccinated for COVID-19,” according to Botswana authorities.
In a subsequent statement, the government revealed that the new variant “was detected on four foreign nationals who had entered Botswana on the 7th November 2021, on a diplomatic mission.”
Meanwhile, South Africa’s medical chief Dr. Angelique Coetzee described the panic as a “storm in a teacup,” adding that she had only seen “very very mild cases” of the variant so far. (Full article here.)
South African Health Minister, Joe Phaahla, has also stated that the corporate media is making this into more of an issue than it should be.
What are the Globalists Planning to do with this New Fake Variant?
This is not a difficult question to answer. All one has to do is turn on their TV to a corporate news broadcast, or read one of their publications, because they will all mostly say the same thing.
The Omicron variant is more transmissible, but they don’t know if it’s more dangerous yet (keeping their options open).
It originated in Africa, possible mutating in an “untreated AIDS patient” (sick people are breeding grounds for dangerous “mutations”).
“it has more than double the mutations of Delta…scientists anticipate that the virus will be more likely to infect – or reinfect – people who have immunity to earlier variants.(undermining natural immunity, selling more boosters, keeping the scarefest going).
“Scientists are concerned” that current vaccines may not be as effective against the new strain, they may need to be “tweaked” (get your boosters, and the new booster we haven’t invented yet)
“Scientists expect that recently approved antiviral drugs, such as Merck’s pill, will work as effectively against the new variant” (more on this later)
It’s already spreading around the world, and travel bans may be needed to prevent the need for another lockdown
We’re already seeing preparations for more “public health measures”, with the press breathlessly quoting “concerned” public health officials. We’re being told that a new lockdown won’t be necessary…as long as we remember to get boosted and wear masks and blah blah blah.
Generally speaking, it’s all fairly boilerplate scary nonsense. (Source.)
And of course, Big Pharma already has their “magic pills” almost ready for emergency use authorization to come in and “save the world.”
Let’s go back to the Guardian’s “Omicron” bullet points, above:
Scientists are concerned by the number of mutations and the fact some of them have already been linked to an ability to evade existing [vaccine-created] immune protection.
Scientists expect that recently approved antiviral drugs, such as Merck’s pill, [will work effectively] against the new variant
The “new variant” is already being described as potentially resistant to the vaccines, but NOT the new anti-viral medications.
Pharmaceutical giants Merck and Pfizer are both working on “Covid pills”, which as recently as three days ago, were being hyped up in the press:
US may have a ‘game changer’ new Covid pill soon, but its success will hinge on rapid testing
In the US, an emergency use authorisation can only be issued if there is no effective medication or treatment already available, so the vaccines not being proof against Omicron would be vital to rushing the pills onto the US market, at least.
If Omicron is found to be “resistant to the vaccines”, but NOT the pills, that will give governments an excuse to rush through approving the pills on an EUA, just as they did with the vaccines.
So, you bet your ass that testing is gonna be “rapid”. Super rapid. Blink-and-you’ll-miss-it rapid. Rapid to the point you’re not even sure it definitely happened. And now they have an excuse.
Really, it’s all just more of the same.
A scare before the new year. An excuse to make people believe their Christmas could be in peril. An exercise in flexing their control muscles a bit, milking even more money out of the double-jabbed and boosted crowd, now newly terrified of the Omicron variant, and a nice holiday bump to Pfizer’s ever-inflating stock price.
At this point either you can see the pattern, or you can’t. You’re free of the fear machinery, or you’re not. (Source.)
Targeting the Children
If you watched the 2-minute video above about the Israeli “war games” simulation for a “new variant” which at the time was allegedly not even known yet, you might have noticed that they are saying that children will be “more susceptible” to this variant, as they were “largely spared” from the “actual virus.”
The Israeli simulation predicted “massive hospitalizations and school closures” among children.
How could they predict that, since children have been mostly immune to COVID-19?
They predicted that because Israel, along with the U.S., just recently started injecting children between the ages of 5 and 11 with the Pfizer COVID-19 gene-altering shots, and they know full well that injuries and deaths in this age group will soon follow.
You can be sure that when reports start coming in soon about these children suffering heart disease, blood clots, and DEATHS, that they will blame it on this new fake variant.
And to make matters worse, and create even more fear, the hospitals will be overloaded and unable to care for many of these children, NOT because the “new variant” is so strong and destructive, but because they have gutted the ERs and hospitals by firing or forcing many of the staff to quit because of COVID-19 vaccine mandates.
Unfortunately for the media, Fauci, and those benefiting from lockdowns and vaccines, the scientist who identified the Omicron variant said, in fact, that it’s “extremely mild.”
Contrary to the panicmongering unleashed by western mainstream median, Barry Schoub, chairman of the Ministerial Advisory Committee on Vaccines, told Sky News on Sunday that while South Africa, which first identified the new variant, currently has 3,220 people with the coronavirus infection overall and while the variant does appear to be spreading rapidly, there’s been no real uptick in hospitalizations
“The cases that have occurred so far have all been mild cases, mild-to-moderate cases, and that’s a good sign,” said Schoub, adding that it was still early days and nothing was certain yet.
Most importantly, and running counter to the fearmongering narrative being pumped out 24/7 by the mainstream media, Schoub said that the large number of mutations found in the omicron variant appears to destabilize the virus, which might make it less “fit” than the dominant delta strain. (source)
A picture is worth 1,000 words. Losing your limb(s) due to a gene therapy injection that doesn’t stop infection or transmission and has caused more adverse reactions and death than any other vaccine in the history of VAERS is the icing on the cake.
This video shows yet another woman needing a double leg amputation after the COVID shot. And to be clear, while the video implies this is due to a “complication with COVID,” the fact she was injected with the experimental gene therapy increased the issue exponentially. The word is out that these injections cause deadly blood clots and embalmers are seeing other rubbery substances in the vasculature. Please remember, there are effectivemedications for COVID, thereby eliminating any need for this experimental shot; however, these life-saving meds are being heavily ignored, censored and banned. On the other hand, there is no treatment to reverse amputations.
A List Of People Who Had Their Leg Amputated Shortly After Receiving COVID-19 Vaccine
The COVID World post date: November 25th, 2021
As the vaccination train rolls on, tales of horrifying side effects continue to pile up. The mainstream media reports only on these cases in isolation, if at all, deliberately ignoring the wider pattern of serious blood clots directly linked to vaccination. At this point, the evidence seems deniable only when these cases are not looked at together as a group
Here is a list of people from around the world that, in just the last few weeks and months, have had their leg amputated as a result of the COVID-19 vaccine.
Dave Mears: Former Taekwondo World Champion’s Leg “Exploded” 1 Month After Receiving AstraZeneca Vaccine
Former taekwondo world champion Dave Mears had his left leg amputated just a month after receiving the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine, which caused his leg to “explode”.
Mears received the shot on March 4th and immediately developed flu-like symptoms and a sky-high temperature. A month later, he was hospitalized for a leg infection that was so bad that his leg ‘exploded’ at Peterborough City Hospital, showering blood everywhere.
Doctors had no choice but to amputate his left leg above the knee.
“There was blood everywhere. It was terrifying. I had the operation and they amputated the leg and I lost five units of blood. It was pretty serious and I was very poorly after that.”
Mears was crowned taekwondo world champion in 1984During his 21 years abroad in Thailand, Mears qualified as a professional photographer and ran a series of successful bars before COVID-19 caused his business to come crashing down.
Cicera Santos: Brazilian Woman Had Left Leg Amputated 1 Week After Receiving Pfizer Vaccine
39-year-old Cicera Santos from Brazil had to have her left leg amputated due to blood clots just a week after getting the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine.
Santos took the shot on August 25th and was hospitalized four days later with venous thrombosis in her left leg. The thrombosis was so severe that doctors had no other option but to amputate her leg below the knee.
The mother-of-two said after the amputation:
“I was affected by venous thrombosis in my left leg just a week after the vaccine.
I was a healthy person before this and I never had problems with my blood circulation.”
Jummai Nache: 47-Year-Old Medical Assistent Had Left Hand, Right Fingers and Both Legs Amputated Shortly After Receiving Second Pfizer Vaccine
Jummai Nache, a 47-year-old medical assistant from Minneapolis lost both of her legs and left hand after her Pfizer COVID-19 vaccination.
Nache got her second shot on February 1st and immediately experienced chest pains. She was hospitalized on February 13th after blood clots were found throughout her entire body. Both her legs below the knees and most of her hands had to be surgically removed or she would’ve died.
Jummai’s husband, Philip, said after her horrific injuries:
“My experience on this journey has been so difficult but I can’t imagine the excruciating pain mental, physical, and emotional that my wife is going through.”
Junmai’s case was investigated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). However, the agency could not determine whether the vaccine played a role in her condition. Junmai and her husband Philip were not satisfied with these findings.
The Nigerian couple is still fighting for justice to this day.
Goran: 50-Year-Old Construction Worker Had Leg Amputated Due To Blood Clots Three Weeks After Receiving AstraZeneca Vaccine
Viennese construction worker Goran had to have his right leg amputated due to blood clots just 3 weeks after receiving his first AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine.
Goran had developed severe pain in his leg and “spat blood once or twice a day”. By March 13th, the pain in his leg got so bad his wife called an ambulance.
The builder of more than 30 years said:
“I’ve never felt such pain in my whole life. My leg was white, blue and black.”
He had to have three surgeries in one week and was put in an induced coma. When he awoke, doctors told him that his lower leg had been amputated.
“I will never forget that pain when I woke up for the rest of my life.”
Alex Mitchell: Scottish Man Had Left Leg Amputated 2 Weeks After Receiving AstraZeneca Vaccine
56-year-old Alex Mitchell lost his leg just 2 weeks after receiving the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine on March 20th.
Mitchell, from Glasgow Scotland, was hospitalized on April 4th after collapsing at home. He had developed blood clots in his lower abdomen and in both legs which forced surgeons to remove his left leg above the knee.
“The doctors were speaking to consultants all around the world about me, because it was unheard of for someone with this level of clotting to survive.”
Despite losing his leg, Mitchell was still positive about the vaccine and did not want to ‘discourage’ others from taking the shot.
“I had the vaccine because I want things to go back to normal as soon as possible and the only way we can do this is by being vaccinated. I wouldn’t want to discourage people from having the Covid jab.
From what they know, what happened to me is rare. It’s only going to affect maybe one or two people, so don’t let it put you off.”
Harold Molle: Australian Man Had Left Leg Amputated Just Days After Receiving AstraZeneca Vaccine
Australian Harold Molle had to have his left leg amputated because of blood clots just three days after his second dose of the AstraZeneca vaccine.
Molle said about the incident:
“It was excruciating pain.
It’s going to cost me now, I’ve got to get an artificial leg and a wheelchair.”
Despite losing his leg, he too spoke positively about the vaccine.
“The vaccine worked because it saved me in the hospital because I caught COVID there, and if I didn’t have the vaccine they said I would have most probably got real sick.”
Ketsiri Kongkaew: 20-Year-Old Student Lost Her Leg After AstraZeneca Vaccine, Died 2 Months Later From Blood Thinner Complications
Thai student Ketsiri Kongkaew had to have her leg surgically removed just weeks after receiving the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine.
The 20-year-old, who had received her shot on August 13th, immediately developed a high temperature and flu-like symptoms and was hospitalized a week later for severe blood clots in her left leg which gave doctors at Krabi Hospital no other option but to surgically remove her leg.
Her grandmother, Harlia Kongkaew, said about the injury:
“She [Ketsiri] was transferred to Surat Thani Hospital for an X-ray where doctors said that there was a blockage in the artery and that she had to be sent to Krabi Hospital for emergency surgery. That’s when her left leg got amputated above the knee.
This was a result of the vaccine. She never had any diseases before this.”
The student initially seemed to recover from her operation and was put on blood thinners, which caused a brain haemorrage just two months later. Doctors performed emergency surgery but Ketsiri died after a few days.
Juan Pablo Medina: Mexican-American Actor Had Leg Amputated Due To Blood Clots Shortly After Receiving COVID-19 Vaccine
“La Casa de las Flores” actor Juan Pablo Medina had his leg amputated on August 3rd due to thrombosis. The 44-year-old actor is alleged to have gone to a deep depression after his horrific injury.
The news prompted thousands of reactions on social media with speculation about the cause of his condition. Media reported at the time that the actor’s life was at stake during the emergency surgery, and therefore his family opted for the amputation to save him.
His wife Paulina Dávila recently said that he is still in full recovery and hopes soon to publicly speak about the incident:
“When he [Juan Pablo] is ready, he will share his story and tell everyone what happened. It is not up to me.”
Jeanine Calkin: State Senator Had Leg Amputated Shortly After Receiving COVID-19 Vaccine
Senator Jeanine Calkin had to have her right leg amputated because of a blood clot that had developed shortly after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine.
Calkin, who is a senator for the state of Rhode Island, said after the amputation:
“Doctors discovered that I had an infection, which had led to blood clots. The clotting had blocked the flow of blood to my legs. The doctors determined that to save my life, they needed to amputate my right leg, which they did on Friday.”
Despite the clot developing shortly after receiving the jab, Calkin stated that she does not believe it was related to the vaccine.
Madison Area Lyme Support Group 
