Archive for the ‘Testing’ Category

PCR Madness Continues

Reliance upon PCR testing is patently insane and/or evil

Faulty PCR testing has been and continues to be used to justify government response to ‘pandemics,’ despite the fact that it’s been shown again and again to be worthless.

  • Creator of the PCR, Kary Mullis, states the test played a central role in the HIV war that lasted 22 years but represented a “laboratory artifact, a set of lab-tortured antigens around which a ‘test’ was built.”  Please see this excellent commentary on Montagnier’s claims by Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos et al.

    Nothing was proven before it was asserted. This became the norm, paving the way for the situation we are in now.    Global viral communism. 

  • This study showed that 86% of PCR-positive COVID cases were not real infections.
  • This study showed that when PCR is run at 35 cycles or higher, the false positive rate is 97%.
  • This study found patients with PCR tests at a CT above 33-34 are not contagious and can be discharged from the hospital.
  • Cycle threshold (CT) is not reported on PCR tests, making all results meaningless.
  • PCR can’t distinguish virus from harmless, dead viral fragments.
  • PCR tests are detecting host DNA, whether from birds, cows, or humans.
  • FDA package inserts from some ‘vaccines’ confirm live viruses can be shed from bodily fluids for at least 28 days after ‘vaccination’ confirmed by PCR, raising the question of what the test is detecting – vaccine virus RNA or wild virus RNA.
  • According to the PCR inventor and reality, you can get PCR to show virtually anything you want
  • A Portuguese court ruled PCR to be unreliable and unlawful to quarantine people.

Yet, here we are…..

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/who-demands-90000-influenza-and-covid?

WHO Demands 90,000 Influenza and COVID PCR Tests Per Month Worldwide, Spanning 153 Labs in 131 Countries, Including U.S. CDC

Unelected foreign group dictates how sovereign nations must commit to “enhancing influenza pandemic response.”

Jon Fleetwood

The World Health Organization (WHO) has released its overview of “pandemic influenza preparedness and response activities,” in which it reasserts its expectation that labs all over the world provide the unelected foreign body with 90,000 influenza and coronavirus PCR tests per month.

The unprecedented scale of continuous PCR testing on tens of thousands of human respiratory specimens raises serious privacy concerns and questions why the WHO is expanding reliance on a testing method whose reliability has long been contested.

A 2020 Clinical Infectious Diseases publication confirms that cultures from 97% of PCR-positive specimens are unable to grow live virus in cell culture, meaning the vast majority of PCR ‘positives’ do not correspond to detectable, infectious virus.

Moreover, BLAST genetic analysis confirms that the CDC’s influenza PCR primers and probe share widespread partial sequence homology with the human genome, raising questions about how reliably the assay distinguishes influenza virus from background human genetic material in respiratory samples.

Will the WHO again declare a pandemic based on PCR results instead of confirmed infections?

(See link for article)

_______________

**Comment**

The new FDA ‘vaccine’ chief, Dr. Vinay Prasad, said it best:

“Do Not test, do Not report cases, do Not wear face masks, do Not take the shots.”

Boom.

Category:

Activism, Testing, Viruses

After Decades of Dismissal, Chronic Lyme Disease is Now Recognized

https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/after-decades-of-dismissal-chronic-lyme-disease-is-now-getting-recognized

After Decades of Dismissal, Chronic Lyme Disease Is Now Recognized

Patients with persistent Lyme symptoms face medical limbo as federal officials and researchers debate causes, treatment, and what to call the condition.
Cara Michelle Miller
Updated:

“Like a human hockey puck”—that’s how Nikki Schultek describes a year spent ricocheting between specialists in Connecticut, each focused on one piece of her deteriorating health—bladder pain, neurological symptoms, joint pain—while missing the whole picture.

“I really don’t fault the clinicians,” she told The Epoch Times. “The training hones them to be experts in a domain.”

After her odyssey of misdiagnoses, Schultek finally received a correct diagnosis of Lyme disease. However, her experience navigating a fragmented health care system brought her to Washington on Dec. 15, where Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. convened a rare federal roundtable addressing what he called long-standing failures in how the disease is diagnosed, studied, and treated.

“Lyme disease is an example of a chronic disease that has long been dismissed, with patients receiving inadequate care,” Kennedy said at the event. “I want to announce that the gaslighting of Lyme patients is over.”

The Medical Divide

Schultek’s story echoes those of many patients whose months—or years—of fatigue, pain, neurological symptoms, and cognitive problems, after undergoing a battery of tests, are eventually traced back to that one tick bite that infected them with Lyme disease.

Persistent symptoms from Lyme disease are both difficult to diagnose and treat, in part because health agencies, mainstream medicine, researchers, and patients disagree about what is causing the debilitating constellation of symptoms.

The roundtable brought together patients, clinicians, researchers, and advocates to discuss what many describe as long-standing failures in how Lyme disease is diagnosed, studied, and treated. At stake is not just terminology, but access to care.
 
(See link for article)
_______________
 
**Comment**
 
Two things, right off the bat: 
 
  1. It’s going to take a whole lot more than an accurate test to fix this beast.
  2. A simple pronouncement from Kennedy is not going to stop the deeply entrenched gas-lighting of patients.
  3. I do blame doctors, public health, and institutions that ignore the Hippocratic Oath – a vow to ‘do no harm,’ and would rather turn patients away entirely or diagnose them with anything but Lyme/MSIDS, furthering their misery. 
The entire paradigm is set against patient health.  
The article falsely regurgitates that only 10% go on to suffer lingering symptoms, when microbiologist Holly Ahern puts it between 40-60% – a far cry from 10%. It also falsely states that 90% are successfully treated with a few weeks of antibiotics when research demonstrates again and again treatment failures in nearly every antibiotic study done.
 
The article doesn’t even sniff at coinfections. Reality paints a starkly different picture from what the article paints.  Most patients are sicker than dogs and infected with multiple pathogens which require entirely different drugs.  Nary a word on pleomorphism either (Bb’s ability to shapeshift and lie dormant to reemerge later).  
These issues are relevant as they make patients infinitely sicker and more complex.
Sorry – not feeling too excited about this.  Reading through the comments didn’t help either.  I saw plenty of the “if you are healthy you won’t get this,” and “take ivermectin,” or take Japanese knotweed.”  
 
If only it was that simple!

To comment, you are limited to 1500 words.  I left this comment:

Far more than 10% go onto suffer persisting symptoms because they don’t include those who are diagnosed and treated late – which is most of us: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/02/25/medical-stalemate-what-causes-continuing-symptoms-after-lyme-treatment/.

For a bird’s eye view of the entire sordid, complicated affair: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/09/25/why-should-we-care-about-lyme-disease-a-colorful-tale-of-government-conflicts-of-interest-probable-bioweaponization-and-pathogen-complexity/

How Lyme/MSIDS (multi systemic infectious disease syndrome – because Lyme is just the tip of the spear) has been handled is palpably insane. It’s going to take a whole lot more than an accurate test to fix this juggernaut. Doctors are afraid to diagnose let alone treat it: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/12/15/everything-about-lyme-disease-is-steeped-in-controversy-now-some-doctors-are-too-afraid-to-treat-patients/

My husband and I only achieved our health back after FIVE years of intensely nuanced and expensive treatment and then retreating for a few months after relapsing 3-4 times.
Not sure I’d even be writing this if it weren’t for this life-saving treatment.
It’s sexually and congenitally transmitted.

All my initial symptoms were gynecological. Remember, it’s a cousin to syphilis: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2024/12/18/letter-breaking-down-timeline-deception-of-lyme-disease-no-studies-have-ruled-out-sexual-transmission/

_______________

If you have the time, comment after the article here:   https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/after-decades-of-dismissal-chronic-lyme-disease-is-now-getting-recognized-5960441?

 
 

Category:

Activism, Lyme, Testing, Ticks

CDC Flu PCR Primers Match Human DNA Across the Genome

UPDATE:

BLAST analysis shows that the CDC’s measles RT-PCR forward primer, reverse primer, and fluorescent probe all have near-perfect contiguous matches to the human genome, which means the positive test is based on human genetic material rather than measles virus itself.

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/cdc-flu-pcr-primers-match-human-dna?

CDC Flu PCR Primers Match Human DNA Across the Genome: New BLAST Data

Are we detecting viruses or ourselves?

Jon Fleetwood
Dec 16, 2025

The CDC’s ‘Influenza SARS-CoV-2 (Flu SC2) Multiplex Assay’ is a real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) laboratory test used to detect influenza A, influenza B, and SARS-CoV-2 in upper or lower respiratory samples.

Mainstream health authorities use PCR tests to quantify how many infection cases there are.

Case numbers are used to declare pandemics and justify pandemic response measures like lockdowns, masking, social distancing, and vaccination campaigns.

But what if these tests aren’t detecting viruses?

What if they’re detecting human DNA?

That would mean the primary justification for pandemic declarations is built on signals that may not represent viral infection at all, but amplified fragments of the human genome—calling into question the scientific basis for case counts, emergency powers, and every downstream policy decision tied to them.

Scrutiny of the PCR test is warranted, given the high likelihood of an incoming bird flu pandemic and the international coordination documented on this website.

A new BLAST analysis of the CDC’s Influenza SARS-CoV-2 (Flu SC2) Multiplex Assay reveals that every variant of the influenza A forward primer, reverse primer (across all ambiguity resolutions), and probe independently produces dozens to over 100 significant partial matches—often perfect over 15–18 bp core segments—scattered across nearly every human chromosome, establishing widespread human genomic homology.  (See link for article)

________________

**Comment**

This is not the first person to notice this troubling issue.

The genetic sequences used in PCRs to detect suspected SARS-CoV-2 and to diagnose cases of illness and death attributed to Covid-19 are present in dozens of sequences of the human genome itself and in those of about a hundred microbes. And that includes the initiators or primers, the most extensive fragments taken at random from their supposed “genome” and even the so-called “target genes” allegedly specific to the “new coronavirus”. The test is worthless and all “positive” results obtained so far should be scientifically invalidated and communicated to those affected; and if they are deceased, to their relatives. Stephen Bustin, one of the world’s leading experts on PCR, in fact says that under certain conditions anyone can test positive!

In this report we are going to add the results of a particular research we have done from the data published on the alleged SARS-CoV-2 and on the protocols endorsed by the WHO for the use of RT-PCR as well as the data corresponding to the rest of the “human coronaviruses”. And the conclusions are extremely serious: none of the seven “human coronaviruses” have actually been isolated and all the sequences of the primers of their respective PCRs as well as those of a large number of fragments of their supposed genomes are found in different areas of the human genome and in genomes of bacteria and archaea, such as these: Shwanella marina JCM, Dialister succinatiphilus, Lactobacillus porcine, Lactobacillus manihotivorans, Leptospira sarikeiensis, Bizionia echini, Sanguibacteroides justesenil, Bacteroides massiliensis, Lacinutrix venerupis, Moraxella bovis, Leptospira saintgironsiae, Winogradskyella undariae, Acetobacterium puteale, Chryseobacterium hispanicum, Paenibacillius koleovorans, Tamiana fuccidanivorans, Fontibacillua panacisegetis, Ru bacter ruber , Skemania piniformis, Chryseobacterium shigense, Caloramator peoteoclasticus, Cellulosilyticum ruminicola, Nitrosopumilius evryensis and a long list of others.  Go here for research showing that those claiming to have isolated coronaviruses relied on ‘isolates’ of previous ‘human coronaviruses,’ as well a the sequences of covid are found in both humans and numerous microbes.

Read this informative article by Dr. Mullis, the creator of the PCR on how it was never intended to be used to diagnose people.

For more:

Category:

Activism, Testing, vaccines, Viruses

RFK Jr. To Lead Lyme Disease Roundtable Today: December 15, 2025

https://www.lymedisease.org/hhs-lyme-roundtable-dec15/

RFK Jr. to lead Lyme disease roundtable on December 15

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has announced a roundtable discussion titled Invisible Illness — Leading the Way with Lyme Disease, scheduled for December 15, from 2:00–4:30 PM Eastern Time / 11:00 AM–1:30 PM Pacific Time.

The event will be broadcast live to the public on the HHS YouTube channel:

http://
 

Lyme Disease Round Table

The session will be convened by Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., along with senior HHS leadership, Members of Congress, clinicians, researchers, innovators, and patient advocates.

The roundtable will focus on several topics, including:

  • Early detection of Lyme disease
  • Coordinated care approaches
  • Next-generation diagnostic tools
  • Federal priorities for Lyme disease and related chronic conditions

Organizers note that the conversation will highlight the roles of researchers, transparency in decision-making, and patient participation in shaping solutions.

SOURCE: US Department of Health and Human Services

For more:

 
 

Category:

Activism, Lyme, research, Testing, Treatment

Avian Flu Pandemonium: The Coming False Positive Catastrophe

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/avian-flu-pandemic-or-pandemonium?

AVIAN FLU PANDEMIC OR PANDEMONIUM?

I Tried to Warn You All About the False Positives from Non‑Quantitative RT‑PCR on SARS‑CoV‑2

No One Acted.
Now AIV H5 RT‑qPCR Is Set to Repeat the Same Catastrophe.

The Pandemaniacs Are Everywhere. Proper standards for nucleic acid testing will keep them at bay. The time to act is NOW. Tomorrow, it could be too late. I urge you to read and act.

James Lyons-Weiler, PhD
President, IPAK | Founder IPAK-EDU.org | Founder, NAATEC
Dec 01, 2025

The settings for a COVID 2.0 Pandemic of False Positives are all in place. “We must catch every case” is no excuse to misdiagnose individuals and let them cook and potentially die at home quarantined w/untreated, misdiagnosed bacterial pneumonia or other less virulent respiratory illnesses.

We could have saved millions and millions of lives if people had understood and acted in April 2020: False positives in PCR tests drove the COVID-19. We must not allow a repeat with avian flu.

In 2020, I warned—publicly, repeatedly, in articles, podcasts, and tweets, and with evidence, fighting censorship all the way—that using non‑quantitative RT‑PCR as the primary driver of pandemic policy would guarantee a tidal wave of false positives, distort epidemiology, and weaponize diagnostic noise as public fear. Those warnings were not vague or speculative; they were precise, technically grounded, peer‑reviewed, and absolutely correct.

I explained that without internal negative controls for Ct‑stratification, nested PCR confirmation, or sequencing, PCR tests would be repurposed into fear‑amplifiers rather than disease‑detectors. I warned that once governments built policy on raw PCR counts and arbitrary Ct values, no one would be able to distinguish real outbreaks from diagnostic artifacts. I said we would lose the ability to tell signal from noise, disease from contamination, and epidemiology from hysteria. I knew I was right. But too few could understand how central the diagnostic grift was the COVID-19 fear mongering.

People in high places heard the warnings. They understood them. I know, because I warned Peter Marks at US F.D.A. And others.

And he and the others who knew did nothing. Millions died after developing severe, untreated, misdiagnosed bacterial pneumonia.

That inaction helped create a world where some actors benefited from chaos—whether through political leverage, pharmaceutical opportunism, or supranational control frameworks. Call them what they are: enemies of stability who thrive when populations panic.

I warned too early. Nothing happened.

But then they came after all of our jobs. All of them. That got our attention. But cataclysmic damage was already done, including millions of deaths due to misdiagnosed and untreated bacterial pneumonia and sepsis.

We Must Call them “PANDEMANIACS”

Now, those same forces stand ready to exploit the next diagnostic mirage. Pandemaniacs are all over Twitter, Bluesky, everywhere posting one-off references to H5N1 as an inevitable next pandemic.

We must hold the line: NO PROOF OF SEQUENCE? NO DIAGNOSIS. NO CASE Count. NO NESTED CONFIRMATION. NO CURVE. NO PANDEMIC.

This is the line.
This is the standard.
This is the bright red boundary that must not be crossed again.

If sequencing is not performed, then PCR positives are NOT clinical cases, NOT epidemiological evidence, and NOT a valid basis for public‑health actions.

(See link for article)

______________

**Comment**

Spread the word and stand your ground.  

Refuse to be moved by fear tactics and those spouting a ‘follow the science’ mantra who are merely spreading and following a narrative.

Weiler rightly demands the following:

  • 100% nested RT‑PCR + Sanger sequencing of all early outbreak samples until ≥300 true positives are confirmed.
  • 2 to 20% ongoing sequencing confirmation, stratified across Ct bands (<25, 25–30, 30–35, >35), laboratories, and sample types to provide N>1000 empirical votes on SN, SP, FPR, and FDR.
  • Full disclosure of Ct distributions, LoD, assay design, primer/probe sequences, and sequencing confirmation rates.
  • Immediate audits of any laboratory with a confirmation rate <80% in any sample category.
  • Mandatory sequence deposition in open databases.
If a lab cannot meet these standards, it should not be generating case counts. Period.

Weiler points out:

A recent re‑analysis of a nationwide dataset (the German “ALM” consortium, which handled ~90% of the country’s SARS‑CoV‑2 PCR testing) found that when cumulative RT‑PCR positives were compared against later IgG seroconversion data, the scaling factor that best fit the observed antibody curves was 0.14 — meaning only ~14% of PCR-positive individuals ever developed detectable antibodies, consistent with actual infection.

Fourteen percent stopped the world, quarantined people, separated family members, foisted an unproven medical device on the populace which caused people lose their jobs for refusing it, and abandoned truly sick people.

For more:

Category:

Activism, Testing, Viruses