According to reports from both parents and doctors, it now appears this poor child who was struggling to breathe was refused breathing treatments for RSV…..
Another person who tested positive for measles died, but no additional details including comorbidities will be released. They go out of their way; however, to tell you they were unvaccinated. Have we learned nothing? The lack of transparency and dishonesty must end. The health department is counting this as a ‘measles related death,’ in spite of all of these factors.
Dr. Henry Ealy Says Texas Dept. Of Health Services Source Told Him Child Was Not Admitted For Measles And Family Has Confirmed “…The Child Did Not Die From Measles.”
The Mennonite Child Was Not Vaccinated, And Was Admitted For Multiple Life Threatening Conditions. Tested Positive On PCR, Which Is Never Diagnostic Of Infection
Here is the untold story: A child died, of multiple co-existing respiratory illnesses, in Texas, and somehow it became international news.
That tunnel system right there—hospitals to mass media—is the one to look at. How on earth, and why on earth, did this child’s death get sent out to the media, while no child who dies of a vaccine reaction ever gets reported? The answer is obvious.
Hospitals are part of the propaganda arm of Big Pharma and public health apparatus. (See link for article and an important history lesson regarding how a HIV ‘positive’ patient was used for a similar nefarious reason.)
_______________
**Comment**
Dr. Henry Ealy gives another history lesson from California in 2014 at Disneyland when a similar measles hysteria was created to set the stage for Senate bills creating ‘vaccine’ mandates. It forced a mass exodus from California. He then states that a Texas whistleblower contacted him with additional information on the untimely death of a child that is being used by the media to drum up fear.
The child was admitted to the hospital with RSV, pneumonia, and measles.
Ealy was hung up on by a DHS agent for simply asking questions, and he is calling for radical transparency and that all medical conditions are listed in cases like this.
How this case is being handled will result in children being mandated to get MMR shots to enter school and Senate bills putting politicians in charge of medical decisions rather than parents.
The Texas Health Dept. is doing the same thing the CDC does to drive up numbers:fraudulently grouping together those who are of unknown vaccine status with those who are unvaccinated.
Measles outbreaks occur every year across the U.S. despite 90.8% MMR vaccine uptake.
ICAN’s attorneys obtained documents related to the widely reported May 2023 “outbreak” of measles in Maine. As it turns out, test results from the CDC confirmed that the measles case was “consistent with vaccine strain,” meaning there was no “outbreak” and, instead, it was the vaccinethat caused the child’s rash.
In 1971, the U.S. Naval Medical Research Institute published a groundbreaking review of 2,311 scientific studies on the biological and health effects of electromagnetic fields. The findings were stark: 132 distinct biological effects, symptoms, and diseases were linked to wireless radiation exposure. The Navy’s report was a warning—a prophetic one, as it turns out. But like so many warnings about environmental and public health risks, it was ignored.
Today, we’re living in the shadow of that neglect. A new paper reveals the devastating consequences of that inaction. Announced at the Annual Conference of the American Academy of Environmental Medicine, the paper connects the dots between unheeded warnings from 50 years ago and the current epidemic of chronic disease in the United States.
The implications are staggering.
Of the 36 fastest-growing chronic diseases in the U.S., 23 were predicted by the Navy’s 1971 study. By 2015, these diseases accounted for over 549 million cases and added as much as $2 trillion in annual healthcare costs to the U.S. economy. The paper argues that this explosion in chronic illness is not a coincidence—it’s a direct result of unchecked exposure to wireless radiation. (See link for article)
It’s important to note that 5G and the digitization it provides is needed for The Great Reset, the ‘powers that be’ are thrusting upon us. They know very well the technology has deleterious effects upon all biological life forms but it’s all for ‘the greater good,’ which simply means what’s best for “Stakeholder Capitalism,” which has been described as ‘tyranny for the good of its victims.’ Touted as being inclusive, there are three firms in particular: “BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard—that together are the largest shareholder in about 80% of the companies in the S&P 500 and have accumulated unprecedented control (commonly known as a monopoly) over U.S. corporations forcing their own ‘environmental, social, and governance’ (ESG) agenda upon the American corporate sector and by extension, on all of us. It’s only good for those in power – not the average Joe.
Included in this quagmire is AWZ Venture Capital, an investment fund that invests in transformational nanotechnology that is next generation AI powered, and whose board of Directors is the who’s who of Israeli, US and UK Intelligence. This ‘transformational nanotechnology’ includes smart dust, self assembly nanotechnology, mesogen microchips, Quantum Dot biosensors – all of which are DUAL PURPOSE militarized applications for bioelectronic surveillance, remote control and torture and can be used not just for bidirectional telemetry but also remote extermination – all AI controlled.
Please see the following inquiry that will most likely go unanswered. Note that Dr. John Aucott is a coauthor of this study who often says he believes in chronic Lyme disease but only at Lyme disease events held by advocacy groups.
———- Original Message ———- From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net> To: “aghirsch@geisinger.edu” <aghirsch@geisinger.edu> Cc: “aejustice1@geisinger.edu” <aejustice1@geisinger.edu>, “cmnordberg@geisinger.edu” <cmnordberg@geisinger.edu>, “nsjosyula@geisinger.edu” <nsjosyula@geisinger.edu>, “jaucott@jhmi.edu” <jaucott@jhmi.edu>, “alison.rebman@gmail.com” <alison.rebman@gmail.com>, “bschwar1@jhu.edu” <bschwar1@jhu.edu>, “bmcinfectiousdiseases@biomedcentral.com” <bmcinfectiousdiseases@biomedcentral.com>, “irina.masalagiu@springernature.com” <irina.masalagiu@springernature.com>, “rauf.bhat@springernature.com” <rauf.bhat@springernature.com> Date: 03/01/2025 12:04 PM EST
Subject: A comparison of genome-wide association analyses of persistent symptoms after Lyme disease, fibromyalgia, and myalgic encephalomyelitis – chronic fatigue syndrome
Annemarie G. Hirsch, Anne E. Justice, Amy Poissant, Cara M. Nordberg, Navya S. Josyula, John Aucott, Alison W. Rebman & Brian S. Schwartz
To: Annemarie G. Hirsch, Corresponding Author
I read your manuscript with great interest and wanted to share a comment on your article I received from a fellow researcher who has experienced first-hand the devastation of Lyme disease. I added HTML links (references) to his statement and included my own comment. Additionally, I have a question for you and your co-authors.
Comment received:
“With respect may I say as Lyme and PTLD victim, Borrelia has the following characteristics:
Or, maybe it’s as the authors claim that PTLD is associated with:
“Our top index single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), rs77857587, is in high linkage disequilibrium with a long-range protein quantitative locus SNP, rs111774530, for the MARC2 (Mitochondrial Amidoxime Reducing Component 2) protein.”
What academic discipline would you encounter if your department acknowledged chronic Lyme disease and began focusing on finding effective antimicrobial treatments for all borrelia forms; round body, biofilm etc.?
Patients in U.S. hospitals were given COVID-19 vaccines without their knowledge or consent while under sedation.
Legal teams claim health care workers have confirmed the practice, calling it an “abominable covert act.”
A mother in the UK fights to stop a hospital from vaccinating her Down syndrome child under sedation against her will.
Medical journals propose administering vaccines during perioperative periods to boost compliance, raising ethical concerns.
Hospitals discarding medical ethics to increase vaccine uptake
In a stunning revelation that has sent shockwaves through the medical and legal communities, hospitals across the United States are being accused of covertly administering COVID-19 vaccines to patients while they are under sedation. According to attorneys representing victims, this egregious practice bypasses informed consent and violates fundamental medical ethics. The allegations, brought forward by the Freedom Counsel, a legal group defending those affected by vaccine mandates, suggest that patients undergoing routine medical procedures were injected with experimental mRNA vaccines without their knowledge—a practice one lawyer described as an “abominable covert act.”
Warner Mendenhall, founder of the Freedom Counsel, stated on social media platform X that his team has verified multiple accounts of patients being vaccinated while under anesthesia. “Were you or a family member COVID vaxxed while under sedation? We are hearing stories of this abominable covert act,” Mendenhall wrote. He added that many patients would have no way of knowing they were jabbed, as the injections were likely not documented in their medical charts.
This disturbing trend is not isolated to the U.S. In the UK, a mother is battling the National Health Service (NHS) to prevent her Down syndrome child from being vaccinated against COVID-19 while under sedation. The mother described the hospital’s plan as “tantamount to assault” and a blatant violation of human rights. (See link for article)
Blueprint for Government-Controlled Medicine Sidesteps RFK Jr.
By The ANH Team
Just as RFK Jr. gets his legs under his desk at HHS, a centralized public health agenda is gathering pace that threatens medical freedom, farmers’ rights, food security, and individual choice. Action Alert!
The CDC’s One Health Framework centralizes authority over public health decisions, potentially limiting independent research, open discussion, and medical freedom.
The rollout of One Health is part of the public health response to bird flu, mirroring the COVID-19 playbook.
The One Health approach sets the stage for greater government control, mandated health policies, and reduced medical autonomy.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), and the Department of Interior (DOI) have jointly unveiled their National One Health Framework to Address Zoonotic Diseases and Advance Public Health Preparedness in the United States. Framed as a way to address zoonotic diseases and public health challenges—like the H5N1 bird flu—the One Health approach claims to integrate human, animal, plant, and environmental health concerns into a unified strategy. In our view, this framework lays the groundwork for sweeping governmental control over medical (and veterinary) decision-making and, in the case of the bird flu, direct intervention in the nation’s food supply.
One Health: Centralized Control Disguised as Public Health
The One Health approach has been around for several years but had not become official policy until January 2025. The policy effectively consolidates power in the hands of three federal agencies led by the CDC, USDA and DOI, dictating public health responses during crises. Instead of allowing independent research, open discussion, and medical freedom, this framework ensures that a “unified federal voice” dictates the narrative and available treatment options.
Crucially, the powers-that-be appear to be deploying One Health policies primarily through the USDA and not the CDC, which comes under the jurisdiction of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). This shift away from CDC control is likely linked to Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s role as new head of HHS, and he has been vocally resistant to pharmaceutical-driven health policies. The rollout of One Health, which emerged during the COVID era under the Biden administration, is being justified by rising concerns over the bird flu situation.
COVID Redux: H5N1
H5N1 avian influenza, aka ‘bird flu’, renamed more recently (presumably because it sounds more dangerous?) as ‘highly pathogenic avian influenza’ (HPAI) is a highly transmissible viral infection that primarily affects wild birds but has spread among poultry and dairy cows in the US. There have been a handful (70) human cases so far in the US with 1 death, according to the CDC. (You can reference our earlier coverage of the bird flu hereto get more background.)
The unfolding public health response to H5N1 bird flu mirrors the tactics used during COVID-19, except this time the food supply is involved. Scientists working under the pretext of pandemic preparedness have long manipulated avian influenza viruses, increasing their ability to cross species and infect humans (sound familiar?). Pharmaceutical interventions like mRNA vaccinesare already in development using half a billion dollars of taxpayer money, ensuring that government-backed solutions are already in place if/when further outbreaks occur.
Federal agencies have used this situation to justify mass culling of poultry, purportedly to prevent further spread. Just as during COVID-19, PCR testing—known for its high false-positive rates—is being used to assess the number of infections. Inflated case numbers fuel media hysteria and the sense that there is a public health crisis. The result is artificial food shortages and price inflation.
You can see where this is going: to return to “normal,” we’re going to be told to accept mandatory vaccination of farm animals under the guise of disease prevention—no matter what the human health consequences may be of eating food that has been treated with mRNA vaccines. This crisis ultimately forces farmers and the public into compliance, making acceptance of One Health measures a prerequisite for food security.
Why This Matters
The One Health Framework is, in essence, an infrastructure for centralized medical and veterinary control. By ensuring a unified government voice, dictating public and animal health responses, and training agencies to enforce these directives, the plan undermines medical and health freedom as well as the right to informed choice. Under One Health-style frameworks, it’s not hard to imagine what the next round of lockdowns might look like, with public health authorities having learned from the mistakes of the first round during COVID.
A similar push for centralized control is evident in the World Health Organization’s (WHO) plans to exert greater influence over global health policies (see ANH International’s analysis). President Trump’s decision to withdraw from the WHO was driven by desire to resist global control, but only time will tell how the new Administration will respond to centralized, coordinated responses like One Health that develop within America’s borders. There is also the specter of how future presidents might act in relation to the WHO, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), and other United Nations’ agencies. The One Health Framework is, oddly, entirely in alignment with the global doctrines of UN agencies, and they potentially lay the foundation for international directives that override national sovereignty in health or veterinary policy.
Farmer First and Health Freedom
Outbreaks of highly contagious diseases like bird flu have already led to large-scale culling of poultry in the US, with over 35 million birds in commercial flocks being killed so far. This has caused significant distress and financial hardship for poultry farmers. The policy is part of the ‘stamping-out’ policy for avian influenza that meets World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH) standards in an effort to maintain international poultry exports. Accordingly, the USDA is using the policy to force farmers to cull their flocks when ‘HPAI’ is detected, regardless of whether or not animals are sick. Many farmers and farmers’ groups are questioning the ethical and animal welfare impacts of the ‘stamping-out’ policy.
But it’s not just farm animals that are at risk of these draconian policies. One Health envisions coordinated responses against human cases that follow the rubric that was so widely adopted—and rarely questioned—by government authorities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Rather than consolidating authority into a top-down bureaucracy, we should encourage open scientific debate rather than enforcing a unified narrative, promote individual choice in medical treatments, ensure transparency and accountability in public health decisions, and prioritize local or regional responses and health strategies over broad federal mandates.
Public health should empower individuals, not enforce compliance. The CDC’s One Health Framework moves us toward an era where governments dictate medical choices, silencing those who dare to question official recommendations.
It’s time to reject centralized medical authoritarianism and advocate for a diverse, open, and decentralized health system that encourages the dissemination of truthful health information and respects the right of individuals to make informed choices about their own bodies and well-being.
Action Alert! Write to Congress and tell them to reject the One Health framework to protect individual medical autonomy. Please send your message immediately.
Go to top link to write Congress to oppose One Health Framework.
______________
**Comment**
Sadly, a lot of Lymeland has embraced One Health, and research is nearly all earmarked with this Trojan Horse euphemism. The similarly and disastrously named PTLDS comes to mind.
Reggie Littlejohn, founder and president of Women’s Rights Without Frontiers and co-chair of the Stop Vaccine Passports Task Force, described One Health as “a very holistic-sounding approach to healthcare” that emphasizes “the interface between human health, animal health, plant health and ecological health.”
“All of that sounds very inclusive and holistic,” said Littlejohn, but “my concern is that it gives the WHO, under the pandemic treaty, the ability to intervene in any aspect of life on earth. So, if they find a health risk that involves animals or plants or even the environment, not just humans, then they can go into operation concerning that.”
“The entire One Health Scheme is based upon the patent lie and obvious disinformation that COVID-19 somehow magically leaped from some animal in the Wuhan wet-market instead of being an offensive biological warfare weapon with gain-of-function properties that leaked out of the Wuhan BSL4 [biosecurity level 4 lab].”
