Archive for the ‘Activism’ Category

U.S. Strikes Medical Fraud

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/us-strikes-medical-fraud?

U.S. STRIKES MEDICAL FRAUD

June 23, 2026 takedown announcement shakes medical fraudsters to the core

James Lyons-Weiler, PhD

Jun 24, 2026

June 23, 2026 takedown: 455 defendants, 90 licensed medical professionals, over $6.5B in alleged false claims, HHS/CMS/OIG participation, CMS suspensions/revocations, and Sec. Kennedy’s statement on HHS collaboration with law enforcement. (Department of Justice).

The Department of Justice has announced an historic national health care fraud takedown involving 455 defendants, charging 90 physicians and other licensed health care professionals, in alleged schemes totaling more than $6.5 billion in false claims.

Federal authorities reported cases across 56 federal districts and 45 states and territories, participation by 50 state Medicaid Fraud Control Units, and seizure of more than $182 million in cash, luxury vehicles, jewelry, and other assets.

The announcement describes the largest health care fraud takedown in Department history, but its significance lies in what the cases reveal about the operating environment in which modern medical fraud can scale. These were not merely clerical irregularities or disputed interpretations of billing rules. The cases described by DOJ involve alleged kickbacks, medically unnecessary services, false diagnoses, prescription-drug diversion, hospice fraud, wound-care billing schemes, Medicaid exploitation, and patient harm, including death. (See link for article)

_______________

**Comment**

Remember “trust the science?” Well here we are……not trusting science or those who tell us to ‘trust the science.’

Best quote:

“The American people do not need lectures about trust. They need institutions that earn it. On June 23, 2026, federal law enforcement and HHS gave the country a glimpse of what earned trust requires: not deference to credentials, not blind faith in systems, and not public-relations medicine, but accountability.”

For more:

Yet More Darkfield Microscopy Showing Microchip & Parasite-Like Self Assembling Nanotech in Pfizer Shots

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/microchip-like-parasite-like-and?

Microchip-Like, Parasite-Like, and ‘Self-Assembling Nanotech’ Structures Found Inside Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine: Journal ‘IJVTPR’

Researchers publish darkfield microscopy images of Pfizer jab material.

Jon Fleetwood

Jun 24, 2026

Researchers publishing in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research this month have released a study featuring darkfield microscopy images of what they describe as self-assembling “parasites,” massive ribbon-like structures, compartmentalized protocells, and a rectangular embedded structure inside Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine material, arguing that the findings are consistent with advanced synthetic biological architectures.

The publication comes as the CDC awards Pfizer more than $1.24 billion in contracts for more COVID shots.

The new paper, “From Synthetic DNA and RNA-Based Self-Assembling Nanotechnology to Sequelae of COVID-19 Shots,” was published June 19 by independent researcher Shimon D. Yanowitz and Okinawa Christian University professor Daniel Broudy.

At the center of the study are microscope images derived from Pfizer vaccine-vial contents.

According to the paper, researchers placed drops of Pfizer vial material on microscope slides and observed the contents beneath coverslips.

The authors report that unusual structures appeared and organized over time after the vial material was placed under observation.

One of the first images highlighted in the paper is what the authors describe as:

“A synthetic structure, resembling a ‘parasite’ that self-assembled on a glass-slide with some fluid from a Pfizer vial placed there and located under a coverslip.” (See link for article)

________________

For more:

Pineal Gland Calcification as a Convergnt Pathological Mechanism: From Circadian Disruption to Neurodegeneration

https://sayerji.substack.com/p/pineal-gland-calcification-as-a-convergent?

Pineal Gland Calcification as a Convergent Pathological Mechanism: From Circadian Disruption to Neurodegeneration

Sayer Ji

May 25, 2026

A Hypothesis Paper

Prepared for submission to Medical Hypotheses / Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience

Abstract

Background and Purpose

Pineal gland calcification (PGC) affects over 60% of adults globally yet is routinely classified as a benign incidental radiological finding. This paper argues that PGC represents a significant and underinvestigated convergent mechanism in age-related pathology, with downstream consequences spanning circadian dysregulation, melatonin decline, oxidative stress, amyloid-beta accumulation, and neuropsychiatric vulnerability.

Methods

We synthesize peer-reviewed evidence across five domains: (1) epidemiology of PGC prevalence; (2) biochemistry of hydroxyapatite formation and its inhibitors; (3) environmental and physiological contributors including fluoride exposure and chronic stress; (4) melatonin pathway disruption and its systemic consequences; and (5) associations between PGC and neurological disease, including Alzheimer’s disease, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and Parkinson’s disease.

Conclusions

Convergent mechanistic and epidemiological evidence supports reconceptualizing PGC as a modifiable pathological process rather than an incidental finding. Known crystallization inhibitors — magnesium, phytate, pyrophosphate, and vitamin K2 — represent plausible preventive interventions warranting prospective clinical investigation. We propose a unified three-stage mechanistic model and a research agenda for longitudinal and interventional studies. (See link for article)

CDC Quietly Admits Genomic Sequencing Can’t Prove Virus Transmission but Issues Mandatory Federal Quarantine Orders To Passengers on Cruise Ship Anyway

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/cdc-quietly-admits-genomic-sequencing?

CDC Quietly Admits Genomic Sequencing Cannot Independently Prove Virus Transmission Chains: ProPublica Report

If “[s]equencing alone cannot determine whether transmission has been continuous or sustained,” how much of modern outbreak science is proven reality—and how much is interpretation?

Jon Fleetwood

Jun 08, 2026

A new ProPublica investigation into purported measles outbreaks in Texas and Utah contains a quietly devastating admission from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) about the limits of modern genomic outbreak surveillance.

ProPublica had asked the CDC whether it had linked any of Utah’s measles cases to an international outbreak.

“Sequencing alone cannot determine whether transmission has been continuous or sustained,” the agency told ProPublica.

In plain English:

Even if two purported measles genomes appear almost identical computationally, the sequencing data itself cannot independently prove the virus spread continuously from person to person across states and over time.

That distinction is important because modern outbreak systems increasingly rely on a narrative of:

  • genomic sequencing,
  • phylogenetic “family trees,”
  • mutation tracking,
  • lineage reconstruction,
  • and computational epidemiology

to support claims that outbreaks are connected, transmission is ongoing, and diseases have become “endemic.”

These same systems were heavily used during COVID to justify lockdowns, vaccine mandates, school closures, quarantine powers, travel restrictions, and other unprecedented government response measures.

How much of modern outbreak science is proven reality—and how much is computer interpretation?

If even CDC admits these genomic systems cannot independently prove continuous real-world transmission, the public may need to reconsider how much trust should be placed in media headlines, “variant” narratives, endemicity claims, and government emergency measures built on computer sequence-based outbreak interpretation systems. (SEE link for article)

_______________

https://thevaccinereaction.org/2026/06/cdc-officials-involuntarily-quarantine-americans-after-hantavirus-outbreak-on-cruise-ship/

CDC Officials Involuntarily Quarantine Americans After Hantavirus Outbreak on Cruise Ship

by Carolyn Hendler, JD

Published June 10, 2026

CDC Officials Involuntarily Quarantine Americans After Hantavirus Outbreak on Cruise Ship

Officials at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued mandatory federal quarantine orders to 18 American citizens who had been passengers aboard the M/V Hondius, an expedition cruise ship on which there was an outbreak of the deadly Andes strain of hantavirus. None of the 18 Americans had tested positive for the respiratory virus at the time the involuntary quarantine orders were issued.1

The orders required the Americans to be sent to and remain in the federally funded National Quarantine Unit (NQU) at the University of Nebraska Medical Center in Omaha, Nebraska, through at least May 31, 2026. Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, who leads both the CDC and the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) signed the quarantine orders. Bhattacharya is a co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration, which was written to protest the government’s lockdown policies in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.2

Several passengers who had been on the cruise ship had already made arrangements with their state and local health departments to be monitored at home. However, all 18 passengers were informed at the last minute that they would not be allowed to return home and instead would be forced to stay in the NQU.3

Angela Perryman, 47, was among the 18 Americans ordered to remain in quarantine at the Nebraska facility.4 Despite federal health officials publicly stating that the passengers’ stay at NQU was entirely voluntary, when Perryman and another passenger attempted to leave, they were handed federal stay-in-place quarantine orders.5 Anyone violating the quarantine orders issued by the government would face a criminal fine or up to one year in jail.6

Perryman told NPR:

I am angry. I feel betrayed because I’m being imprisoned. It’s a nice prison. But this is a prison. Let’s be clear: I am being detained against my will.7

(See link for article)

________________

For more:

Important excerpts:

The U.S. government has been funding gain-of-function hantavirus experiments since at least 2017.

A July 2025 Pathogens publication confirms the U.S. military funded experiments aerosolizing hantavirus pathogens (making them airborne) with a 30% fatality rate.

Less than a year after the publication, the Andes hantavirus cruise ship outbreak would be declared.

Moreover, NIAID’s $70 million PROVIDENT program actively funded and operated a large-scale hantavirus preparedness initiative that engineered vaccine platforms, mapped Andes hantavirus structures in unprecedented detail, developed rapid-response countermeasure systems, and prioritized hantaviruses as future pandemic targets in the run-up to the 2026 international Andes hantavirus outbreak.

The Andes hantavirus genome was built from human blood at the infamous U.S. military biolab Fort Detrick.

Recent genetic analysis finds that hantavirus PCR test sequences—used to count cases—also match human DNA, raising concerns that the test is mistaking human genetic material for hantavirus.

The government’s hantavirus research, surveillance, genome-construction, and countermeasure infrastructure was already fully operational before the 2026 outbreak narrative emerged.

Kennedy has now invoked federal liability protections for favipiravir that is not approved anywhere in the world for hantavirus treatment and was only conditionally authorized in Japan for pandemic influenza—yet is now being positioned for use on Americans.

Preclinical animal studies have shown that favipiravir has the risk of teratogenicity and reproductive toxicity in experimental animals, including findings indicative of birth defects in mice, rats, rabbits, and monkeys, along with decreases in live fetal body weight and in the number of live fetuses.

How They Rig Clinical Trials & The Price We All Pay For It

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-they-rig-clinical-trials-leaving?

How They Rig Clinical Trials and The Price We All Pay For It

A practical guide to spotting doctored research and finding the therapies that actually help

A Midwestern Doctor

Jun 03, 2026

Story at a Glance:

  • Scientific research has provided immense benefit to society, but as its success earned it power, prestige and enormous financing, incentives shifted from advancing humanity to protecting the status quo and ensuring vast profits for the pharmaceutical industry.
  • We spend more and more on science each year, yet the problems we’ve tasked it with solving remain unsolved, even when solutions already exist. COVID-19 made this painfully clear: dozens of treatments existed for the disease, but rather than utilize them, the medical establishment treated the infection as “incurable” and used that framing to justify a series of counterproductive policies which devastated the economy and left us with a death toll well over a hundred times greater than the poorest nations that did nothing at all.
  • Central to maintaining this orthodoxy is the belief that large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) must serve as the primary arbiter of scientific truth while other viable and proven research approaches are discarded. While RCTs are sometimes immensely helpful, their data often has minimal clinical relevance to patients yet their dominance displaces all the scientific data which does.
  • Because large RCTs cost tens of millions of dollars, only a handful of parties can afford to conduct them, which means they are typically done to bring profitable products to market rather than to advance health. Worse, since so much money rides on each trial, perverse incentives always exist to doctor the results so a positive outcome is guaranteed.
  • Over the years, a robust system of ways to rig trials has emerged, with tactics that exaggerate or fabricate benefits while downplaying or erasing harms. Despite being well recognized, these tactics persist because the regulators and medical journals who depend on the status quo turn a blind eye.
  • This article provides a concise summary of how trials are routinely rigged, gives you the resources to spot this manipulation and protect yourself from it, and highlights the straightforward solutions that could bring science back to something that prioritizes advancing humanity.

How to Rig a Trial

Since the risks and benefits of a therapy are determined by it having a “statistically significant” improvement from the comparison group (e.g., those receiving placebo), trials are typically gamed by:

  • Making the placebo group do worse, so that by comparison to that artificial baseline, the treatment appears better than it is.
  • Finding ways to inflate the positive effects reported for the treatment and eliminate the negative ones.
  • Finding ways to cast the results obtained in a more positive light and creatively downplay the negative ones.
  • Sifting through the random statistical variation inherent in any large trial to identify the specific analytical permutations where a “benefit” spontaneously appears, then presenting those selected findings as the definitive result.
  • Ensuring that almost everyone only sees the curated presentation of the trial data which makes the drug look as good as possible.

(See link for article)

_________________

**Comment**

The author shows how they rig the trial design, manipulate data mid-stream, game the analysis, control what gets published, spin the presentation, and control the narrative.

Each and everyone of these tacts has been used in Lyme/MSIDS, climate, and vaccine research. It’s all gamed for a predetermined outcome which has been killing patients for decades.

For more: