The IPM Institute (Integrated Pest Management) is seeking donations of tick specimens from different regionsto examine during the Tick IPM Academy on Nov. 6 & 7, 2019. Please mail in ticks at least a week before. Below is the IPM Institute’s address where specimens you wish to donate may be sent.
This is for examination only – no pathogen reporting will occur.
The IPM Institute of North America, Inc.
ATTN: Maria Weber
211 S. Paterson Street, Suite 380
Madison, Wisconsin 53703
Thank you,
Maria Weber
Team Member, Sustainable Food Group
Office: (608) 232-1410 x 1009
Breaking News: Dr Tim Ball Defeats Michael Mann’s Climate Lawsuit!
Published on
Written by John O’Sullivan
Supreme Court of British Columbia dismisses Dr Michael Mann’s defamation lawsuit versus Canadian skeptic climatologist, Dr Tim Ball. Full legal costs are awarded to Dr Ball, the defendant in the case.
The Canadian court issued it’s final ruling in favor of the Dismissal motion that was filed in May 2019 by Dr Tim Ball’s libel lawyers.
The plaintiff Mann’s “hockey stick” graph, first published in 1998, was featured prominently in the U.N. 2001 climate report. The graph showed an “unprecedented” spike in global average temperature in the 20th Century after about 500 years of stability.
Skeptics have long claimed Mann’s graph was fraudulent.
On Friday morning (August 23, 2019) Dr Ball sent an email to WUWT revealing:
“Michael Mann’s Case Against Me Was Dismissed This Morning By The BC Supreme Court And They Awarded Me [Court] Costs.”
A more detailed public statement from the world-renowned skeptical climatologist is expected in due course.
Professor Mann is a climate professor at Penn State University. Mann filed his action on March 25, 2011 for Ball’s allegedly libelous statement that Mann “belongs in the state pen, not Penn State.” The final court ruling, in effect, vindicates Ball’s criticisms.
Previously, on Feb, 03, 2010, a self-serving and superficial academic ‘investigation‘ by Pennsylvania State University had cleared Mann of misconduct. Mann also falsely claimed the NAS found nothing untoward with his work.
But the burden of proof in a court of law is objectively higher.
Not only did the B.C. Supreme Court grant Ball’s application for dismissal of the 8-year, multi-million dollar lawsuit, it also took the additional step of awarding full legal costs to Ball.
This extraordinary outcome will likely trigger severe legal repercussions for Dr Mann in the U.S. and may prove fatal to alarmist climate science claims that modern temperatures are “unprecedented.”
According to the leftist The Guardian newspaper (Feb, 09, 2010), the wider importance of Mann’s graph over the last 20 years is massive:
“Although it was intended as an icon of global warming, the hockey stick has become something else – a symbol of the conflict between mainstream climate scientists and their critics.”
Under court rules, Mann’s legal team have up to 30 days to file an appeal. For readers interested in accessing the court website directly, use this link.
‘Hockey Stick’ Discredited by Statisticians in 2003
In 2003 a Canadian study showed the “hockey stick” curve “is primarily an artefact of poor data handling, obsolete data and incorrect calculation of principal components.” When the data was corrected it showed a warm period in the 15th Century that exceeded the warmth of the 20th Century.
So, the graph was junk science. You could put baseball scores into Mann’s Climate Model and it would create the Hockey Stick.
But the big question then became: did Mann intentionally falsify his graph from motivation to make profit and/or cause harm (i.e. commit the five elements of criminal fraud)?
No one could answer that question unless Mann surrendered his numbers. He was never going to do that voluntarily – or face severe consequences for not doing so – that is, until Dr Ball came into the picture!
Evidence in Legal Discovery and the Truth Defense
Dr Ball’s legal team adroitly pursued the ‘truth defense’ such that the case boiled down to whether Ball’s words (“belongs in the state pen, not Penn State”) after examining the key evidence (Mann’s R2 regression numbers) fairly and accurately portrayed Mann.
The aim was to compel the plaintiff (Dr. Mann) to show his math ‘working out’ to check if he knowingly and criminally misrepresented his claims by resorting to statistical fakery (see: ‘Mike’s trick‘ below).
In the pre-trial Discovery Process the parties are required to surrender the cited key evidence in reasonable fashion, that they believe proves or disproves the Claim.
Despite Ball’s best efforts over 8 years, Mann would not agree to surrender to an open court his math ‘working out’ – those arcane R2 regression numbers for his graph (see Mann’s latest obfuscating Tweet in the ‘update’ at foot of this article).
But throughout 2017 and 2018 any reasonable observer could see through such endless delays from the plaintiff – all just attritional tactics.
The Penn State professor had persistently refused to honor the binding “concessions” agreement he made to Ball which ultimately gave his legal team the coup de graceto win the case for the defendant due to Mann’s ‘Bad Faith’ (see: legal definition here).
Dr. Ball always argued that those numbers, if examined in open court, would have conclusively proved Mann was motivated to commit a criminal fraud. It was at this point legal minds could discern Ball was closing in on victory – a triumph for ‘David over Goliath.’
And Mann certainly is a science ‘Goliath.’ Ever since featuring so famously in the UN IPCC 2001 Third Assessment Report (TAR) Mann’s graph has been an iconic image cited relentlessly by environmentalists clamoring for urgent action on man-made global warming.
For the past two decades the biased mainstream media has acclaimed Mann as “a world-leading climate scientist” and last year he was heralded as their champion to help dethrone “climate denier” President Trump.
Indeed, not just a fawning MSM, but many hundreds of subsequent climate studies have relied on Mann’s findings. Mann’s reputation was such, that most climate researchers merely accepted his graph, a typical example of groupthink.
Dr Ball has long warned that if the world was permitted to see behind the secrecy they would be shocked at just how corrupt and self-serving are those ‘scientists’ at the forefront of man-made global warming propaganda.
As anyone can tell by contrasting and comparing the graphs below (Mann’s version top, Ball’s below) it is obvious there exists a massive discrepancy in the respective findings.
Above: contrast and compare Dr Mann’s dodgy graph with Dr Ball’s more reliable version (based on that of the renowned H. H. Lamb) and see how Mann fraudulently altered the proxy climate date with a ‘hockey stick’ shape to falsely show the dramatic uptick with modern temperatures rising ‘catastrophically’ to fit the fake UN IPCC doomsaying narrative.
Have Skeptics Ever Proven that Mann’s Graph was Deliberately Faked?
Answer: No. This is because Mann has always refused to release his R2 regression numbers for independent examination.
He claimed his secrecy was justified because he held “proprietary rights” over them (i.e. personally valuable intellectual work product, you see). So “valuable” to Mann was the secrecy of his metadata that losing a multi-million dollar lawsuit and his reputation was the ultimate price he was prepared to pay.
While steep, I guess, that’s preferable to serving a long federal prison stretch, right?
Before Ball’s glorious court victory, little more could be conclusively proven other than the hockey stick graph uptick stupidly (and unscientifically) relies on the proxy evidence from the tree rings of a single Yamal larch!
Mann could thus sleep safe in the knowledge that as long as statistical experts remain deprived of any conclusive proof of his intent to defraud, they could only find him guilty of incompetence.
Putting Mann’s Fraudulent Graph Under the Microscope
For an easy-viewing summary by Tim Ball please watch the video:
Mann’s goal was to make the Little Ice Age (LIA) disappear, as we explained in our previous article on this issue. The LIA was an especially cold era that ended around 1840 and since then global temperatures have gradually risen. But government ‘experts’ like Mann have sought to use statistical trickery to make such natural variation appear as ‘man-made’ warming.
Apart from playing with statistics Mann made his proxy fit the thermometer data by adding thermometer values to the proxy values known as “Mike’s trick” in the climate gate email scandal.
From the emails released during the Climategate scandal Professor Phil Jones, Britain’s top climate scientist at the University of East Anglia was shown to have written the following to his alarmist colleagues (some analysis here).
The email, sent by Prof Phil Jones of the CRU in 1999, states:
Dear Ray, Mike and Malcolm,
Once Tim’s got a diagram here we’ll send that either later today or
first thing tomorrow. I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps
to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from
1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline. Mike’s series got the annual
land and marine values while the other two got April-Sept for NH land
N of 20N. The latter two are real for 1999, while the estimate for 1999
for NH combined is +0.44C wrt 61-90. The Global estimate for 1999 with
data through Oct is +0.35C cf. 0.57 for 1998.
Thanks for the comments, Ray.
Cheers
Phil
This has the Hockey Stick Graph showing the same cooling from 1942 to 1975 as the HadCRUT3 data as posted in the IPCC 2001 AR3
In 1942 there was just 4.0Gt of emissions increasing to 17.1Gt by 1975 but since this 425% increase in CO2 emissions didn’t cause any global warming during this 33 year period; the conjecture of CO2 emissions induced (catastrophic) global warming was proven false.
Readers interested in gaining a deeper understanding of what is likely to eventually be exposed as a criminal conspiracy between Mann and other ‘elite’ researchers should see “The Hockey Stick Illusion” by Andrew Montford.
The Guardian newspaper (above) expressing doubts over ‘(Michael) Mann-made’ global warming.
Victory that Comes at Great Personal Cost
Behind the scenes, gathering the resources, mental, scientific and financial, there is an untold burden of defending these cynical SLAPP suits.
Lest readers forget, it is mostly in the service of misguided public policy, with massive funding and connivance from political operators in play, that fake scientists like Michael Mann and Andrew Weaver acquired such esteemed public positions.
They are not only despicable human beings they are a disgrace to all decent scientists.
Readers will be aware that this author has been a staunch friend and ally to Tim throughout the hardships of this protracted 8-year legal battle.
Our reputations were routinely trashed by our enemies, so it is sweet justice that the court has now given legal credence to Tim’s famous words that Michael Mann “belongs in the state pen, not Penn State,” a comical reference to the fraudulent ‘hockey stick’ graph that knowledgeable scientists knew to be fakery.
[Author Note: Being very much a party to these legal proceedings (having provided Dr Ball with the financial security of a legally-binding indemnity in the event Tim lost) it is a monumental vindication of my faith in Tim’s cause. In effect, I ‘bet the farm’ on Tim winning, as graciously reported by Jo Nova (below)]
Knowingly Fraudulent and Corrupt
During 2018, while Tim Ball’s hard work was winning “concessions” from Mann’s legal team in Canada, south of the border, (on April 20) a shameless Mann wrote in Scientific American this utter nonsense:
“Yet, in the 20 years since the original hockey stick publication, independent studies, again and again, have overwhelmingly reaffirmed our findings, including the key conclusion: recent warming is unprecedented over at least the past millennium.”
Gullible and brainwashed greens and the many self-serving politicians swallowed up this garbage.
Dr Ball Expresses Gratitude to Principia Scientific International
Speaking in this 2018 video on the gravity of what some scientists have called “The science trial of the Century,” Dr Ball revealed his gratitude to his colleagues at Principia Scientific:
Dr Tim Ball:
I know John O’Sullivan who set up the Principia site and I know I wrote a foreword and a chapter in one of the books they produced called Slaying the Sky Dragon.
John O’Sullivan comes from his anti-government [stance], very legitimately and unfortunately, it’s not until you’ve actually directly personally experienced that; challenging the government – that you realize how nasty they can get. So John knows very well how nasty these things can get – that anyone that dares to challenge the authorities.
And so, Principia was set up for that reason, and John was the one that helped me set up the PayPal so people could help me financially so, that’s my disclaimer with that.”
“John O’Sullivan is putting in above and beyond what any single skeptical soul ought to.
He’s already been a key figure helping Tim Ball in the legal fight with the UVA establishment, which has spent over a million dollars helping Michael Mann to hide emails. The case was launched by Michael Mann, but could turn out to do a huge favor to skeptics — the discovery process is a powerful tool, and we all know who has been hiding their methods, their data, and their work-related correspondence.
Tim Ball and John O’Sullivan are helping all the free citizens of the West. The burden should not be theirs alone. There are many claims for help at the moment, but that is a sign that the grand scam is coming to a head. Jo”
Two out of Two Major Court Wins By Ball Versus Junk IPCC Scientists
Dr Ball, now affirmed as a courageous champion of honest science, has assured his place in the annals of real climate science. His gift to the world was sacrificing eight of his senior years, when he could have been enjoying his retirement, to exposing key players in the biggest science fraud of all time.
People too easily forget Dr Ball has defeated in expensive legal battles not just one top UN IPCC climate scientists, but two!
This latest victory is the second this champion of climate skepticism has enjoyed in the last 18 months in this same jurisdiction – both for “defamation,” both multi-million dollar climate science claims.
We reported (February 15, 2018) on Dr Ball’s first crucial courtroom win against Dr Andrew Weaver (photo, above), another elite junk scientist (a UN IPCC Lead Author in climate modeling) and British Columbia Green Party Leader.
Pointedly, at the time, Dr Ball wanted to emphasize an extremely salient fact:
“While I savor the victory, people need to know that it was the second of three lawsuits all from the same lawyer,Roger McConchie, (photo, left) in Vancouver on behalf of members of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).”
In effect, there is more than mere coincidence that Dr Ball, a world-leading skeptical climatologist, was systematically targeted for legal retribution time and again by political groups such as the unscrupulous Climate Science Legal Defense Fund .
As a retired scientist in his 80’s, Tim was a ‘soft target’ and the stress of these lawsuits put an enormous toll on his health.
Not to be outdone, Tim has used his time wisely to write a damning book of the 30-year back story of the great climate fraud titled ‘The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science’ and I heartily recommend that interested readers buy it.
It is also not often reported that the funding in Canada for these extravagant SLAPP lawsuits is believed to be from the David Suzuki Foundation, a hot house for extreme environmental advocacy and Big Green policy promotion.
What is a ‘Strategic lawsuit against public participation’ (SLAPP Suit)?
Wikipedia offers a fair definition:
“A strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP) is a lawsuit that is intended to censor, intimidate, and silence critics by burdening them with the cost of a legal defense until they abandon their criticism or opposition.[1] Such lawsuits have been made illegal in many jurisdictions on the grounds that they impede freedom of speech.
In the typical SLAPP, the plaintiff does not normally expect to win the lawsuit. The plaintiff’s goals are accomplished if the defendant succumbs to fear, intimidation, mounting legal costs, or simple exhaustion and abandons the criticism. In some cases, repeated frivolous litigation against a defendant may raise the cost of directors and officers liability insurance for that party, interfering with an organization’s ability to operate.[2] A SLAPP may also intimidate others from participating in the debate.”
Update (August 24, 2019):
Dr Mann Has Posted On Twitter In Reply To This Article:
In short, Mann’s ugly responsive legal statement is (a) stark admission he lost fair and square, and (b) a disingenuous argument that the Dismissal was granted merely on the basis of Mann’s “delay” in not submitting his R2 numbers in timely fashion.
Well, Mikey, You Are The Plaintiff And Tim Gave You Over 8 YEARS To Get Your Case Together!
On that point, this is where readers may wish to refer to the article ‘Fatal Courtroom Act Ruins Michael ‘Hockey Stick’ Mann‘ (July 4, 2017). In it we offered analysis as to Mann’s fatal legal error. As Dr Ball explained at that time:
“Michael Mann moved for an adjournment of the trial scheduled for February 20, 2017. We had little choice because Canadian courts always grant adjournments before a trial in their belief that an out of court settlement is preferable. We agreed to an adjournment with conditions. The major one was that he [Mann] produce all documents including computer codes by February 20th, 2017. He failed to meet the deadline.”
As I explained in the article, Mann (and his crooked lawyer) had shown bad faith, thereby rendering his case liable for dismissal. I urged Tim to pursue that winning tactic and thankfully he did.
AN APPEAL
Assisting Dr Ball has been a huge honor for me and probably one of the greatest achievements of my life. But Tim only won this famous courtroom battle thanks to massive worldwide grassroots support.
We can only continue to fight these protracted lawsuits with your kind support. Please give generously to ensure we can take on more crucial cases, such as this.
[WWG1WGA]
PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX.
Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.
_________________
**Comment**
You may ask why in the world such an article appears on a website for Lyme/MSIDS patients. Please let me answer that by stating that on a near daily basis, research is crossing my desk in which the terms “Climate Change” and ticks or Lyme are in the titles despite research showing ticks are marvelously ecoadaptive and have survived for eons by seeking out leaf litter, snow, or anything that will offer protection.
One of the most common questions we get asked is: How can I save money on my treatment? This is an essential question, because being able to afford necessary medications, supplements, and herbal therapies is key to achieving successful treatment outcomes. What’s more, you shouldn’t have to choose between, say, buying groceries or paying your rent or mortgage and obtaining the tools you need to improve your health.
We understand that treating chronic Lyme disease can place an enormous financial strain on patients and their families. Although we probably can’t entirely solve this problem for you, hopefully we can offer suggestions for easing some of the financial burdens associated with an illness that often comes with a high cost.
To help you, we’ve rounded up our five best money-saving strategies so that you can focus more on healing your body and less on how you’re going to pay for your recovery.
1. Always Keep a Copy of Your Medical Records on Hand.
It’s not uncommon for chronic Lyme patients to build a team of medical professionalsto assist with healing. The types of healthcare providers on your list might include a Lyme-literate medical doctor, a general practitioner, a specialist, and a physical therapist. But the cost of working with multiple providers can quickly add up, especially if new practitioners want to have a record of your most current tests and lab results.
To avoid having to repeat tests that you or your insurance company have already paid for, ask for copies of your visits, lab reports, and other diagnostic tests. In case you switch providers or add another member to your team, you’ll have your medical history and other beneficial medical information at your disposal. This might also allow you to begin Lyme treatment faster than if you had to request your records from multiple clinics or providers and wait for those results to arrive.
To keep your medical records organized, consider storing recent documents in one place in a folder, a binder, or on your computer. Generally, medical records from within the last year will be most relevant, but if you’ve been dealing with the symptoms of Lyme disease for a while, your healthcare provider may want to take a deeper dive into your health history.
2. Stay Ahead of Your Budget.
In the world of Lyme disease and other chronic illnesses such as fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome, it can be extremely tempting to buy all sorts of products that other patients say have helped them — and there is no shortage of possibilities to choose from. Before you know it, you’ve thrown away a lot of money for mixed results without even realizing it.
Just like you would make a budget for living expenses, groceries, or car repairs, figure out the amount of money you can set aside each month for Lyme treatment, including supplements, medications, and doctor visits. Here are a few money-saving strategies that might help you stretch your budget a little further:
Go for Generic Drugs.
If you’re taking prescription medications, ask your doctor if generic drugs are a suitable alternative for your situation. The co-pays for generic medications are often significantly less than those for name-brand drugs.
Ask for Medication Samples.
If your doctor prescribes you a medication that is newer on the market, consider asking for samples of the drug before you fill the prescription. That way, you’ll be able to try it without the added expense to make sure you can tolerate it and handle any associated side effects.
Request Rates on Bulk Medication Orders.
Sometimes, you may find that buying your medications in a larger quantity — like a 60- or 90-day supply — can reduce the cost of prescription drugs. This applies to those who get medications through a compounding pharmacy, too.
Next time you fill a prescription, ask what the price is for a bulk supply. Even if the cost is just $10 or $20 cheaper, that adds up over time.
Comparison Shop for the Best Prescription Price.
Were you aware that the cost of medications can vary from one pharmacy to another? You might be surprised to learn how much money you can save by simply doing a little price shopping. Plus, the following discount coupons and programs may help to reduce the costs of pricey medications further:
GoodRx: Whether you have health insurance or not, GoodRx can be used to lower the cost of your prescription medications. The program compares drug prices across a variety of pharmacies in your area and features discount coupons, so you can see where you’ll get the best price. The GoodRx service is available to you regardless of your income.
Prescription Hope: To qualify for this program, you must meet certain income guidelines. For individuals making approximately $30,000 per year, households with a combined annual income of $50,000, or households with additional dependents making up to $100,000 per year, Prescription Hope may be able to help you access pricey medications for $50 per month for each drug. Currently, the program has access to more than 1,500 FDA-approved medications. Note that you must set up an account to begin using this service.
RxAssist: If you can’t afford to pay for your medications, RxAssist has a database of different patient assistance programs offered through pharmaceutical companies to offset the cost. To qualify, you must be uninsured, demonstrate financial hardship, or have insurance that does not cover your drug costs.
Take Advantage of Perks from Supplement Companies.
Not everyone responds well to medications, particularly when you’re dealing with persistent Lyme disease symptoms. For many people, herbal therapy offers the most cost-effective, natural solutions, and it’s not likely to carry the same sticker shock as different combinations of drug therapies, says Dr. Bill Rawls, Medical Director of RawlsMD and Vital Plan, who restored his health using herbs.
When you factor in time, energy, and money spent on tracking down treatment approaches, herbs rise to the top for their efficacy and safety for budget-conscious people. Even still, sometimes any expense can feel like a burden when your budget is tight. But there are a few tricks for getting the best prices on herbal therapies, too.
Sign up for newsletters. Periodically, herb and supplement companies will offer discounts and promotional codes for their products, especially around the holidays. If you’re on their email list, you’ll be the first to know about these deals, and you won’t miss out on the lower price.
Choose from companies who have return policies. Some companies have a money-back guarantee on their products if you’re not satisfied with your purchase. Note, however, that return policies will differ from one company to another. In some instances, you might be able to return an unopened product for a full refund as long as you do so by a specific date. In other cases, you may be able to receive a partial refund if the product has been opened or used.
Avoid shipping costs. Not all companies offer free shipping, so costs can quickly add up. To avoid a hefty price tag, look for online retailers who offer free shipping with a minimum purchase order.
Consider automatic shipping. Some companies will give you the option to subscribe to automatic shipping for your favorite products. Typically, this feature allows you to get herbs and supplements cheaper if you sign up to have the product autoshipped to you on a monthly, bimonthly, or quarterly basis. Plus, you won’t have the hassle of trying to remember when it’s time for a refill.
Sign up for rewards programs. If you’re going to spend money more than once with a certain company, you should be rewarded for your loyalty. Some companies offer free programs that allow you to earn points for doing things like making a purchase, sharing a product review, referring a friend, or “liking” them on social media. Those points are then redeemable for discounts on future purchases, free gifts, and more.
3. Make the Most of Your Doctors Appointments.
Why is it that after you leave a doctor’s appointment, your brain becomes flooded with questions you wished you had asked? Unfortunately, some healthcare providers charge for emails or phone calls once you leave the office, making correspondence with them another financial stress.
The next time you’re scheduled to see a doctor, prepare for it in advance so that you can make the most of your appointment. As questions or concerns come to mind, write them down on a notepad or in your phone. The night before your appointment, review your questions to make sure you’ve jotted down the primary areas you want to address.
The next day, be sure to take your list with you, and before your appointment ends, take a moment to look through it and clarify any remaining matters. Hopefully, this allows you to minimize potentially costly back-and-forth communications.
4. Know Your Insurance Plan.
Have you taken the time to read up on your health insurance policy, whether it’s through your employer or elsewhere? If not, now is a good time to start, so you understand the types of services, tests, procedures, or medications that could come out of your pocket.
Although many Lyme specialists, such as Lyme-literate medical doctors (LLMDs), probably won’t be in your insurance network, oftentimes you can do blood work and other testing at places that are in-network, saving you a bunch of money. (Of course, you might be able to find an in-network doctor, too!)
If your doctor is out-of-network, however, you might be able to submit your bill (known as a superbill) to your insurance for partial reimbursement, or it’s possible the amount could be applied to your out-of-network deductible. Additionally, your insurance might cover visits for several adjunct treatments like chiropractic care, physical therapy, counseling services, and even acupuncture, which can help you create a robust healthcare team to assist in your healing.
5. Talk to the Billing Department of Your Hospital or Clinic.
Recently, I went to the hospital to have some blood work done. As I was leaving the building, I walked past the billing department and decided to stop in to see if I had an outstanding balance from a previous test. As it turns out, I did, and I offered to pay my balance on the spot.
The billing assistant began tallying my total — then, she told me she could give me a 25% discount for paying in person. I was pleasantly surprised, and I asked whether this was the hospital’s standard procedure. As a matter of fact, it was. I could receive a 25% discount on any bill that I paid in person. Over time, I’ll save a bundle of money.
If you have unpaid hospital or clinic bills, it’s worth calling the billing department or visiting them in person. Although not every medical facility will offer a reduced rate, you might be able to work out an affordable payment plan with them, so you can continue treatment without worrying about how you’re going to cover the costs.
By understanding your insurance benefits, shopping around, preparing for your doctor’s appointments, and considering your treatment options, you can begin to save money slowly. Over time, the small steps you make can add up to significant healthcare savings, which can help you keep going on your road to recovery.
Dr. Rawls is a physician who overcame Lyme disease through natural herbal therapy. You can learn more about Lyme disease in Dr. Rawls’ new best selling book, Unlocking Lyme. You can also learn about Dr. Rawls’ personal journey in overcoming Lyme disease and fibromyalgia in his popular blog post, My Chronic Lyme Journey.
_________________
**Comment**
I found the following helpful:
Keep a monthly calendar where you write down your main daily symptoms. You can then take that information, notice trends, and write an executive monthly summary. We saw our LLMD every 2-3 months – for two people – and this helped me keep my head. It also keeps your appointment on task.
Don’t be afraid to look into Canadian pharmacies. I could find drugs at a fraction of the cost. Make sure you plan ahead as many take upwards of a month to obtain. Sometimes you have to purchase larger quantities as well. Try to plan this with your doctor to be most cost effective.
Check into programs run by the drug manufacturers. Some have programs for drugs at a reduced rate if you qualify.
Check out Goodrx.com. GoodRx collects prices and discounts from over 70,000 U.S. pharmacies and compares them. Print out the coupons and take to your pharmacy.
Herbal companies often have sales and specials. Try to take advantage of those. They also sometimes have deals on purchasing quantities up front, which could reduce costs for you.
Ask other patients at support group. If we put our heads together we can figure out ways to cut costs.
All sorts of nifty graphs and charts on patients taking part in the project. If you haven’t added your information yet, go here to do so: https://www.mylymedata.org/
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s approval of a new tuberculosis antibiotic this month could be a significant win not only for TB patients, but for a burgeoning nonprofit model for developing prescription drugs.
Please see link for entire article, but in essence this is important for a number of reasons:
The new drug, pretomanid, developed by the nonprofit TB Alliance, achieved a 90% success rate among patients with highly drug-resistant forms of TB who took the antibiotic as part of a three-drug, all-oral regimen over a six month period.
Some LLMD’s are using tuberculosis drugs successfully in refractory Lyme/MSIDS patients
Evidently there has been a pharmaceutical exodus from the antibiotic business due to lack of economic incentive
Pharmaceutical funding has shifted toward drugs that will yield more money such as cancer drugs, because drugs for chronic illnesses are immediately put to use and taken for long periods of time
According to some, the only sustainable model for antibiotics are nonprofits with endowments. Endowments cover basic operational costs and allow for a lengthy and tedious discovery process for antibiotics and drugs that are needed but aren’t profitable
Nonprofits; however, cut costs by having a reduced staff without laboratories, requiring them to partner with other labs, academic institutions, or research organizations as well as develop relationships with for-profit companies for toxicology, chemical combinations and dosages, and the actual manufacturing of the drugs.
incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 
