Author Archive

Fluoride on Trial

https://anh-usa.org/fluoride-on-trial/

Fluoride on Trial

Fluoride on Trial
Will the EPA be compelled by a federal court to end the dangerous fluoridation of drinking water?

THE TOPLINE

  • A federal court will decide, in a few weeks time, whether the EPA needs to stop allowing the fluoridation of water.
  • Fluoride exposure has been linked to neurological effects and a host of other bad health outcomes.
  • Fluoridation is not only dangerous for your health, it is unnecessary.

Groups suing the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) over the fluoridation of American drinking water are now awaiting a decision from a federal court after the trial ended last week. The basis of the suit was the EPA’s rejection of the groups’ Citizens Petition calling on the agency to end the addition of fluoridation chemicals into drinking water due to fluoride’s neurotoxicity. It’s high time fluoridation ceases, as numerous studies have linked fluoride exposure with lower IQ and other health problems.

Substantial evidence links elevated fluoride levels with neurological effects, especially lower IQ. Fluoride also accumulates in the body, including in the pineal gland, other endocrine organs and the skeletal systemContinued exposure is known to disrupt calcium and vitamin D metabolism and contributes to calcification in tissues and blood vessels. A National Research Council (NRC) report from 2006 concluded that the EPA’s standard for fluoride in drinking water is unsafe and should be lowered. The report highlighted damage that can be done to the teeth, bones, brain, endocrine system, thyroid, and pineal gland—all from drinking fluoride. In 2014, fluoride was added to the list of chemicals “known to cause developmental neurotoxicity in human beings” in a review published by Lancet Neurology; only 12 chemicals are on this list.

According to the Citizen’s Petition filed by the Fluoride Action Network, Organic Consumers Association, Food & Water Watch, and others, in the years since that 2006 NRC report, there have been dozens of human studies looking at fluoride’s effect on cognition, with all but a few (46 out of 54) finding statistically significant associations between fluoride and cognitive deficits; three studies since 2006 have found adverse effects on the fetal brain.

Fluoride has been added to drinking water in towns across the United States since 1945 for the purpose of improving dental health. Now, 66% of people in the US receive drinking water with added fluoride.

Even if there weren’t any safety concerns with drinking fluoride, there would still be the question of whether we need to do it in the first place. The world is different than it was 100 years ago, especially when it comes to dental health. Most of us use toothpaste, and many people use fluoridated toothpaste, making fluoride in water unnecessary. Other parts of the world that do not fluoridate their water, like Western Europe, have seen dental decay rates decline just as much as they have in the US.

Fluoride is typically delivered as sodium monofluorophosphate or sodium fluoride in dental products and as fluorosilicic acid (a by-product of fertilizer manufacturing) in municipal water. These are chemical forms that are not found in nature and as such, behave very differently in our bodies. You can read more about integrative dental health herehere, and here.

We will keep you abreast of the court’s decision as we learn more. It’s unfortunate that an agency tasked with protecting us from pollutants must be sued in an effort to force it to do the right thing in the public interest. However, we are finding, repeatedly, this is par for the course when agencies are captured by the interests they are meant to regulate.

For more:

90% of US Cheese is GMO By Pfizer & Timeline to Replace Dairy With SynBio “Milk” Proteins

https://media.mercola.com/ImageServer/Public/2024/March/PDF/gmo-cheese-pdf.pdf

Genetically Modified Ingredients in Most US Cheeses

Analysis by Ashley Armstrong

3/4/24

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • Traditionally, cheese was made with just four ingredients: milk, salt, starter culture and animal rennet
  • Rennet is used as a clotting agent to curdle the milk into cheese, separating the liquid parts of milk from the solids. It’s an essential part of the cheese making process
  • Today, there are four types of rennet used in the cheese making industry: animal rennet, vegetable rennet, microbial rennet, and a genetically modified version called FPC (fermentation-produced chymosin), made by Pfizer
  • Bioengineered chymosin (FPC) was granted Generally Regarded as Safe (GRAS) status, which exempted Pfizer from the pre-approved requirements that apply to other new food additives. This despite the fact that studies have detailed concerns about safety
  • An estimated 90% of North American cheese is made with FPC rennet, and ingredient labels do not distinguish between bioengineered rennet and the original animal-based type so consumers have no way of knowing what they’re eating

In this article let’s dive into why I believe you should only be eating cheese made with ANIMAL RENNET, and how over 90% of the cheese sold in the U.S. does not use this and instead uses a genetically modified version made by Pfizer.

Cheese History

Who doesn’t love cheese?! And for good reason — it is not only delicious but also incredibly nutritious. And despite what mainstream tells us, humans have been making and consuming this superfood for over 7,000 years.1,2,3 In fact, cheese serves an important role in human history.

Historians document that milk, dairy and fermented dairy products, like cheese, served as a nutrient-dense calorie source that was storable, allowing some of the first explorers to safely travel and expand communities, creating more demographic shifts and diverse farming communities.

Dairy provided food security, as it is a nutrient-rich superfood.

Consumption of milk and dairy products would have had many advantages for early farming populations. Milk, yogurt, and cheese are good sources of calories, protein, and fat. They provide a reliable food between harvests or during droughts, epidemics, or famines.

Milk is a relatively pathogen-free source of fluids that could be critical during times of water scarcity. Cheese provides a means of storing these nutrients to be used when milk production is low, and can be easily transported.

Furthermore, fermentation of milk into yogurt or cheese lowers lactose content and allows lactose intolerant individuals to reap the benefits, while maintain, or in some cases enhancing, other essential nutrients such as fat and calcium.”4

But cheese was traditionally made with just these four ingredients:

1.Milk

2.Salt

3.Starter culture, what’s used to make the desired cheese strain (for ex. Muenster versus Swiss)

4.Animal rennet, used as a clotting agent to curdle the milk into cheese, separating the liquid parts of milk from the solids — a very vital part of the cheese making process!

You add culture to milk and let it ferment. Then, you add rennet, which separates the milk into curds and whey. Then you press the curds and age them. And voila — cheese!

Rennet is a complex set of enzymes that are naturally produced in the stomachs of ruminant animals, like cows. The main enzyme present is chymosin, which is a protease enzyme, meaning it breaks down protein. Rennet from animals also contains other enzymes like pepsin and lipase.

So these enzymes in rennet target casein, the main protein in milk. They cause the casein molecules to divide and re-coagulate into even larger clumps, forming cheese curds. So, rennet serves as a vital part of cheesemaking since it helps curdle the milk into cheese, separating the liquid part from the solid part.

Types of Rennet

There are four types of rennet used in the cheese making industry: animal rennet, vegetable rennet, microbial rennet, and FPC (a GMO version).

1.Animal rennet — Animal rennet is the most natural and oldest form of rennet, and what was traditionally used in cheese making. There are milk-clotting enzymes naturally occurring in the stomach lining of ruminant animals. It is well known in the cheese making industry that animal rennet produces a superior flavor, likely because this rennet is a complex set of enzymes (as nature intended), rather than a single isolated enzyme derived in a lab.

Animal rennet is usually 90% chymosin enzyme and 10% pepsin enzyme. The small amount of pepsin will break down the casein protein in milk in a slightly different way compared to just chymosin alone, producing a final product with an enhanced taste.

Cheese made using animal rennet not only tastes better, but it also produces a safer and more natural final cheese product, which will be discussed in depth below.

2.Vegetable rennet — One alternative to animal rennet is vegetable rennet, which unfortunately varies a lot depending on the source, and the term “vegetable rennet” is misused a lot. True vegetable rennet is derived from plants that possess coagulation enzymes. And these plant extracts have been used as milk coagulants since ancient times. Some examples include cardoon thistle, fig tree bark, or nettles.

However, it is well known in the cheese industry that vegetable rennet can negatively impact the final texture and flavor of the cheese.5,6

“Most plant-derived [enzymes] typically exhibit low MCA/PA ratios resulting in poor cheese yield and formation of bitter substances during cheese ripening … Therefore, most of them are not suitable for cheese production.”7

Which is why most of the cheese with the label “vegetable rennet” isn’t real vegetable rennet. It’s either microbial rennet (made from mold) or FPC (the GMO version) since there is no regulation on the terms used for what rennet is used in cheese labeling.

3.Microbial rennet — Another alternative to animal rennet is “microbial rennet,” where the coagulating enzymes are produced by a specific type of mold, fungus or yeast organism grown and fermented in a lab setting (often fed soy). Yum. So while the microorganisms aren’t genetically modified, their food source likely is.

This is considered vegetarian friendly as the enzyme produced by the organism is not derived from an animal. There is again a large consensus in the cheesemaking world that cheeses made with this type of microbial rennet can lead to a final cheese product with a bitter taste. This option is commonly used in “certified organic” and “certified vegetarian” cheeses.

“Microbial [enzymes] are mainly produced by fungi and bacteria in the process of growth and metabolism. Microorganisms have the advantages of a short growth cycle, easy fermentation, and are not limited by space and region of production …

Therefore, the cost of microbial MCEs is low … However, it is found that most MCEs [microbial enzymes] have high PA and low MCA/PA ratios leading to low cheese yield and bitterness.”8

4.Genetically modified FPC — To overcome some of the shortcomings of the vegetable and microbial rennets like the potential bitter cheese taste, scientists have leveraged genetic engineering technology to create new, genetically modified species that generate these milk-curdling enzymes.

Introducing the most common alternative to animal rennet in cheese making — FPC, which stands for Fermentation-Produced Chymosin (FPC). (Chymosin referring to the enzyme that curdles milk, and is naturally present in the stomach lining of ruminant animals).

In fact, 90% of the cheese manufactured in the U.S. uses these enzymes from genetically modified organisms.9

FPC was created by the one and only Pfizer (biotech company) and is made possible by using CRISPR gene editing technology10 where the genomes of living organisms are modified. The “safety” of FPC was evaluated by a 90 day trial in rats.11

How FPC Is Made

Here’s how it is made: The rennet producing gene is taken out of the animal cell’s DNA string and then inserted into the bacteria, yeast or mold host cell’s DNA string in a process known as gene splicing (a type of recombinant DNA technology). Once inserted, the newly placed gene initiates the production of the chymosin enzyme within the host. The host culture is then cultivated and fermented.

These recombinant DNA technologies are relatively new and became popular in the 1980s when the U.S. Supreme Court by a 5-4 vote ruled that new life forms can be patented.12 So then in 1990, in another precedent-setting decision by a U.S. government office, the FDA approved the use of FPC in food. It was the first time a bioengineered product was permitted in food in the U.S. It gets better.

This bioengineered chymosin (FPC) was granted Generally Regarded as Safe (GRAS) status, which exempted Pfizer from the pre-approved requirements that apply to other new food additives.

Since Pfizer demonstrated what is often referred to as “substantial equivalence,” the FDA concluded that bioengineered chymosin was substantially equivalent to calf rennet and needed neither special labeling nor indication of its source or method of production.

In case you didn’t know, this “GRAS” label is a little hand wavy and just a big loophole. In general, federal law requires the FDA to ensure that food additives are safe and mandates a rigorous pre-market safety review process. But the loophole = GRAS.

The GRAS Loophole

Forty-three percent of food additives are designated “GRAS” and don’t get FDA oversight. Essentially, we must trust that food companies will conduct unbiased safety determinations before adding these new GRAS substances to our food.

“According to the FDC Act, food additives that are non-GRAS need approval prior to marketing. In contrast, GRAS substances do not require approval or notification to the USFDA prior to marketing.”13

Meaning the public and other regulatory agencies lack the data needed to assess the safety of some chemicals in our foods. In 2014, Former Deputy FDA Commissioner for Foods Michael Taylor commented on FDA’s failure to regulate food chemicals, saying:14 “We simply do not have the information to vouch for the safety of many of these chemicals.”

GRAS may have started out with good intentions, but it has turned out to be a giant loophole for food companies to get a free pass to use chemical additives in our food with little to no oversight. And of course, there is no other developed country in the world that has a system as archaic as GRAS for approving food additives. Okay tangent aside, back to FPC.

FPC Cheese Is Exempt From GMO Labeling

Even though the organisms that produce this FPC are genetically modified, dairy products using this technology are exempt from having to label their products as “GMO.” In fact, FPC is just listed as “microbial rennet” or “vegetable rennet” on labels. (The source of the rennet is not required to be listed). So it is a little deceiving.

The “Non-GMO” national project does not agree with this FPC technology and believes this is a high-risk ingredient. Moreover, FPC is not permitted in USDA Organic cheeses. And here is a comment from the American Cheese Society:

“FPC rennet is a genetically modified organism (GMO). According to the culture companies, 90% of North American cheese is made with FPC rennet. But ingredient labels do not distinguish between this type of microbial rennet and the original non-GMO type.

And the fact that use of FPC-type microbial rennet is not labeled a GMO leaves those who oppose GMOs in the dark when it comes to choosing cheese.”

And once again, FPC is used in 90% of the cheese made in the U.S.! These alternative rennet methods are up to 2X cheaper than using animal rennet, since it speeds up the aging process to make cheese ready for market faster, which means more profits.

They also allows cheese companies to market to vegetarians (since animal rennet, derived from the stomach of a ruminant animal, would not be allowed). But is FPC safe?

Safety Concerns of GM Enzymes

Well, again, this technology is new. So there are no long term studies evaluating the safety of eating a small amount of this genetically modified food additive every single day.15 But there are two main concerns: 1) toxicity and 2) digestive issues since these rennet alternatives can serve as an allergen.16

Toxicity Concerns

Toxicity meaning that the enzyme solution contains bio toxins from the genetically modified host (mold or fungus) that is being cultured and fermented in the lab. The producers of these enzymes claim the final FPC enzyme solution is highly purified, but some people react as though they still contain some of the allergens from the host microorganisms themselves.

In fact, traces of the genetically engineered bacteria have been found in enzymes.17 A few quotes from the literature regarding these toxicity concerns. I don’t know about you, but I have no desire to consume bio toxins from genetically modified organisms!

“Genetically modified food enzymes are currently produced from GMOs. Safety concerns have been raised regarding potential contamination of food with bacterial toxins or mycotoxins, allergens, or uncharacterized extraneous substances as impurities.”18

“Because these enzymes are purified from microbial sources, toxic substances might be present in enzyme preparations/isolates. The toxic substances are basically bacterial toxins and mycotoxins, which might cause problems/risks related to the health of consumers.

Safety legislation is also very much attentive regarding the allergenic properties of manufactured enzymes, as it is well known that enzymes are potent inhalative sensitizers.

Apart from that, numerous uncharacterized extraneous substances/ impurities of microbial/biological origin may also be present in the enzyme preparation, which is also a matter of prime concern while evaluating the safety of commercial enzyme products.”19

“While food enzyme preparations are considered unlikely to cause any acute toxicity, genotoxicity, or repeat-dose oral toxicity, it is the fermentation product(s) of microorganisms from the manufacturing process that is/are of interest due to the potential presence of secondary metabolites that may induce toxicity when ingested (eg. aflatoxins, fumonisins and/or ochratoxins).”20

So, some are concerned about continuous ingestion of these bio toxins over time, and the negative health consequences those would have over the course of years. And unfortunately, there isn’t much regulation here. “Currently, the companies themselves are responsible for the quality control of their products.”21 Gee, that’s not helpful!

Allergens and Digestive Issues

So as a result of a small amount of these toxins potentially showing up in the final cheese product (and slight structural changes in the final proteins), the cheese can now serve as an allergen and can cause an allergic reaction, or digestive and respiratory issues.22

  • Stomach upset or discomfort
  • Runny nose, increase in mucus production

Consumers then may think they can’t digest cheese — but hey, maybe it is just the cheese that was made! It may not be the dairy itself, but the microorganism residues that elicit an allergic response, or irritate the gut lining.

I personally do not digest cheese that is made with this FPC (which again can be “vegetable rennet” or “microbial rennet” on labels). I get stomach upset and a disruption of my normal bowel movements. So something isn’t going right there! I can only digest cheese made with animal rennet, so I am very picky with what cheese I consume day to day!

GMO Cheese May Compromise Your Gut Health

One of the biggest issues here is the potential disruption of the gut microbiome.

“Lastly, the case study highlights the issues related to the dissemination of [antimicrobial resistance] genes due to their potential acquisition by the human commensal flora, via direct food consumption and by environmental bacteria through contact with soil and water surfaces or food waste. This is especially the case as a living GMM [genetically modified micro-organism] was found in a FE [enzyme] preparation.”23

In addition, allergic responses from ingesting the biotoxin residues or modified protein structures.

“A known safety risk linked to industrial enzyme use is respiratory allergy and for most proteases there is also some potential for skin and eye irritation … Enzymes present a risk of a respiratory allergy (e.g. Aspergillus-derived enzymes in bakers’ asthma) and it is well described in the scientific literature …”24

“Genetic modification of enzymes may also change their allergenic properties, posing new potential health risks. For instance, type I sensitization was found in a study of 813 exposed industrial workers using genetically modified enzymes.”25

So, it is documented in the literature, I experience it personally, and have heard from multiple other people — some people have digestive issues digesting the microbial and vegetable rennets. But do just fine with cheese made in a traditional manner with animal rennet. There are consequences when we try to outsmart nature!

Our Cheese

So, if you have previously had digestive issues or allergy-like reactions to cheese, the type of rennet may have been the issue, not the dairy itself! KNOW YOUR DAIRY!

Our cheese at Nourish Cooperative is not only made with raw, A2A2 milk, but we ONLY use animal rennet in all of our cheese varieties — leading to easier to digest, NON GENETICALLY MODIFIED, nourishing and delicious cheese. We prefer that cheese is made the traditional way, as nature intended. So if you don’t digest other cheeses well, you can likely digest ours just fine! KNOW YOUR FARMER AND KNOW YOUR CHEESE INGREDIENTS!

We are soon accepting new members to our farm cooperative, where we ship the best cheese (along with meat, dairy and sourdough) to all 50 states. Join the waitlist here: nourishcooperative.com.

Ashley Armstrong, with a Ph.D., MS and BS in mechanical engineering and a certified personal trainer, is the cofounder of Angel Acres Egg Co., which specializes in low-PUFA (polyunsaturated fat) eggs. We discussed the importance of low-PUFA eggs in a recent interview, embedded above for your convenience.

Angel Acres ships their eggs to all 50 states — but there is currently a waiting list as she slowly increases the number of chickens within the network to fulfill the demand. If you want to purchase low-PUFA eggs from Armstrong’s farm, join the waiting list at angel-acresfarm.com/pages/waitlist-for-eggs. More egg boxes opening up this spring!

– Sources and References
Go here to learn of the conflicts of interests in “Independent” organic certification.

______________

**Comment**

You just can’t make this stuff up…..

https://organicconsumers.org/timeline-of-efforts-to-replace-dairy-farms-with-synbio-milk-protiens-goes-back-to-1894/

Got Milk? Nope, It’s Fungus! Archer Daniels Midland & Bayer Want Us to Drink SynBio “Milk” with 92 Compounds Humans Have Never Eaten Before!

February 26, 2024  |  by Alexis Baden-Mayer

TAKE ACTION: Ban New GMO Frankenfoods Made with Synthetic Biology!

National Public Radio calls it a conspiracy theory, but there’s no denying that the World Economic Forum has been promoting eating insects as part of its Great Reset.

Obviously this is real and even government funded, but it’s a distraction from synthetic biology, aka precision fermentation, which is the most profitable monopoly-controlled technology of the Great Reset of food and farming.

As bad as cricket farming is, it’s low-tech and requires human beings to manage. Production could be decentralized and local.

The most powerful World Economic Forum company in food and agriculture is Monsanto (now Bayer). It has long been implementing a controlled demolition of the profession of farming in favor of a single, high-tech system that can be controlled on a global scale.

When Bayer ran Auschwitz “for Hitler” as I.G. Farben’s largest factory, one of its products was “butter” made from coal. This is what U-boat sailors subsisted on.

Currently, their favorite synthetic food production model is the genetic engineering of microbes like yeast, fungi and E. coli to produce small molecules (proteins and nutrients) for highly processed Frankenfoods like “non-animal” whey and egg protein.

The dairy and egg industries are the first two agriculture sectors slated to be wiped out, dairy farmers by crushing debt and “environmental” regulations, and egg farmers by the bird flu.

It is fascinating to me that Metabiota, one of the bioweapons defense contractors involved in the creation of the pandemic virus (the other being EcoHealth Alliance), after being linked to Joe Biden and Ukraine labs through Hunter’s laptop, was absorbed by Ginkgo Bioworks, Bayer’s synbio partner in this plot to replace real food with the synthetic products of genetically engineered microbes. And, that Bayer’s favorite spokesperson for this brave new world is George Church, a scientist funded by Jeffrey Epstein and DARPA, who gave an Edge Masterclass for colleagues including Metabiota’s Nathan Wolf and Google’s Larry Page, at Elon Musk’s Space X.

These guys aren’t going to run the world on crickets. They’re going to run it on an automated and robotic system where artificial intelligence designs genetically engineered microbes as factories for the production of synthetic food, medicine, chemicals and fuel. The U.S. Department of Agriculture that might fund crickets, but it’s the Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) that’s been funding what will ultimately be the Great Reset’s choice Soylent Green: using microbes to turn waste into fuel.

Archer Daniels Midland is the company that gave us textured vegetable proteinhigh-fructose corn syruptrans fats and other unhealthy vegetable oilsall made from Monsanto’s Roundup Ready crops genetically engineered to be soaked in toxic glyphosate-based herbicides.

Now, they’re partnering with Perfect DayNew Culture and Ginkgo Bioworks on synthetic milk proteins that the industry predicts will put dairy farmers out of business.

Just like factory farmed milk, synbio “milk” is made from Monsanto (now Bayer)’s GMOs, but the corn is fed to genetically engineered fungus instead of cows.

I recently had the opportunity to interview our Organic & Natural Health Association partners John Fagan and Alan Lewis about the 92 compounds in synbio “milk” humans have never eaten before.

All of this got me wondering, How long has this plot to replace dairy farming with synbio milk been going on? What will corporations and the government do to get us to go along with it? This timeline has the answers:  (See link for timeline)

_____________

For more:

Deadly Meat Allergy

http://

Deadly Meat Allergy

A man suddenly has a cardiac arrest at home and the cause of his medical emergency is a mystery! Let’s solve the mystery together and learn about shock, septic shock, anaphylactic allergies and more!  Scroll to about the 14 minute mark to finally hear he has Alpha Gal.

This video was adapted from a published medical case report: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti…

For more:

It’s far from straight-forward just like Lyme/MSIDS.  So many unknowns.
 

 

Frightening V-Safe Data Yet CDC Green Lights 9th Dose While Downgrading COVID to the Same Severity As the Flu

https://thehighwire.com/ark-videos/the-clot-thickens/  Video Here

EPISODE 360: THE CLOT THICKENS

The V-safe Free-Text Data is Out and Aaron Siri, esq., Has the Details; Jefferey Jaxen reports on the state of vaccine mandates and informed consent in a post-COVID world, and a new vaccine technology beyond injectables that takes it a step too far; The Clot Thickens As A New Study The Severity of The Blood Clot Problem; Funeral director and embalmer’s firsthand account corroborates Haviland’s survey data.

Guests: Aaron Siri, Esq., Thomas Haviland, Richard Hirschman

AIRDATE: February 22, 2024

https://www.dossier.today/p/dose-number-nine-cdc-panel-green

CDC Panel Green Lights Ninth Dose of COVID-19 mRNA

It’s official: the Pfizer loyalty card has become a reality. Nine shots in three years.

Feb. 29, 2024
By Jordan Schachtel
 

For the Americans out there who remain true to the CDC’s vaccine recommendation schedule, you’ll be heading over to your local clinic in the coming weeks for another dose of Pfizer or Moderna’s mRNA Covid gene serum.

On Wednesday, the CDC recommended that seniors get another “booster” in the Spring, making this the ninth dose for Americans who continue to abide by the Government Health booster guidance schedule.

In just three year’s time, the CDC’s vaccine advisory committee has now authorized nine separate injections of a shot that was once advertised as the cure to the coronavirus. (See link for article)

______________

**UPDATE**

According to this, a strain will be chosen for a fall COVID shot people can get simultaneously with the flu shot. Problem is, both are ineffective, dangerous, deadly, and cause antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) or pathogenic priming. Neither prevents the spread of illness.

SUMMARY:

  • The 9th shot will soon be authorized for all ages
  • It targets the Eris variant (EG.5) which no longer exists
  • Big Pharma has conducted shabby studies to keep the narrative that the new shots offer “protection” from the latest variants despite these variants not being detected when the shots were being formulated,
  • The CDC continues to ignore research showing negative effectiveness and observable adverse events.
  • The CDC is ignoring all studies showing that the boosted are more likely to get COVID than the unvaccinated.  

______________

http://  Approx. 8 Min

Trustworthy Lies Are Good For You!

Once again, JP gives truth comedically.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/03/cdc-downgrades-covid-same-severity-as-flu-says/

CDC Downgrades COVID to Same Severity as the Flu… But Says You Must Keep Having Vaccines

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has downgraded the severity of the Chinese coronavirus to the same status as the flu, calling for a “unified approach” to treating such conditions.

In a press release on Friday, the CDC announced it was simplifying its recommendations for treating COVID because the virus no longer presents a significant threat.

The release stated:

CDC released today updated recommendations for how people can protect themselves and their communities from respiratory viruses, including COVID-19.

The new guidance brings a unified approach to addressing risks from a range of common respiratory viral illnesses, such as COVID-19, flu, and RSV, which can cause significant health impacts and strain on hospitals and health care workers.

CDC is making updates to the recommendations now because the U.S. is seeing far fewer hospitalizations and deaths associated with COVID-19 and because we have more tools than ever to combat flu, COVID, and RSV.

(See link for article)

__________________

SUMMARY:

  • Predictably, the CDC takes credit for lessening the severity of COVID despite banning successful treatments which cost approximately 500,000 lives and pushing the ineffective and unsafe COVID gene therapy shots which cost approximately 17 MILLION lives.
  • Predictably, the CDC recommends ‘vaccination,’ treatment, and staying home, but fails to mention treatments that actually work that they banned.
  • Please remember the old, cheap trick of ignoring cases and deaths in the “vaccinated,” biasing estimates of efficacy for transmission that have been utilized.
  • The agency urges getting ‘vaccinated’ to prevent serious illness, hospitalization, and death despite the shots failing on each of those accounts as well as causing more adverse reactions and death than any other vaccine in the history of VAERS.
  • The agency revised the guidelines on isolation for those who test positive for the illness, but urged people to continue wearing face masks and practice social distancing regardless, despite the danger and fruitlessness of these endeavors.  
Sadly, epidemiologists that have been ruthlessly censored and banned have been sounding the alarm on this since the start of the COVID PsyOp :

Again, the CDC is beyond hope and rehabilitation and should be eliminated.

Senate Panel on ‘Vaccines’- The Red Pill We’ve All Been Waiting for

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/this-senate-panel-on-the-vaccines

This Senate Panel On The Vaccines Is The Red Pill We’ve All Been Waiting For

This excellent presentation meticulously breaks down exactly what went awry throughout COVID-19. What everyone needs to know is summarized below.

Article Excerpt:

A lot of work has gone into producing each of the vaccine panels he’s hosted. On Monday, he hosted “Federal Health Agencies and the COVID Cartel: What Are They Hiding?” When it was all said and done, I believe this panel was the most effective presentation I have seen for explaining what happened throughout COVID-19 and waking people up to how much they have been lied to. Because of this I strongly encourage you to watch or share his presentation with people who you think might be open to understanding exactly what was done to all of us. This article will begin with his entire panel:

Lastly, for those who prefer to read, a transcript of Johnson’s symposium can be found here (See link for article and videos)

_______________

**Comment**

Admittedly, the article is long; however, there’s a lot of history to record.

The author took a lot of time to highlight important parts. Video highlights include:

  • Edward Dowd’s work on excess deaths
  • Kevin McKernan’s discovery of DNA plasmid contamination and its connection with cancer
  • Dr. Harvey Risch’s overview of the bioweapons industry
  • Barbara Loe Fisher’s work with vaccine advocacy
  • Brian Hooker’s 23 years of work (15 peer-reviewed papers) on vaccine injuries
  • Del Bigtree’s decade of vaccine advocacy work
  • Dr. Sabine Hazan’s work on existing therapies to treat COVID
  • Dr. Pierre Kory’s work on repurposed drugs for COVID
  • Dr. Christian Perron’s work showing how HCQ and azithromycin lowered COVID death rate got him fired from his 26 year professorship.
  • Raphael Lataster, a leading researcher exposing fraud within COVID vaccine trials
  • Journalist Lara Logan exposed how journalism has been hijacked by the government
  • Matthias Desmet gave a summary of crowd psychology
  • Brett Weinstein talked about malicious forces taking away truth and justice

And many, many more.

Note: for anyone considering being a whistleblower, Johnson requested for you to contact his office here.

The article above is written by A Midwestern Doctor, an experienced doctor who wishes to remain anonymous for obvious reasons. I highly recommend subscribing to this particular Substack as it is very informative and one of the few places you will hear details mainstream media and ‘science’ omit such as: