Author Archive

Geoengineering Warfare: An Exposé

https://www.saveourskies.org/column-contributor

GEOENGINEERING WARFARE: An Exposé

A WAR CANNOT BE WON

WHEN IT IS NOT EVEN ACKNOWLEDGED THAT IT EXISTS

by Jorge Rebagliati

This exposé will demonstrate to you that Geoengineering Warfare is a past and present fact that is being waged in Sonoma County, in all of California, and elsewhere, threatening the very existence of humanity and the rest of the biosphere.

After reviewing the documentation presented below, it should be obvious to you that there is an ongoing Geoengineering war. The first indispensable local step is to issue a resolution banning all geoengineering operations in Sonoma County, demand that the California legislature and the governor ban geoengineering in California, and investigate and prosecute the planners and perpetrators of geoengineering warfare.

The Sonoma County community, where you live and which you love, is under relentless attack by Geoengineering Warfare. Irreparable damage may have already been done, but your (our) swift action to stop these aggressions and to clean up air, water, and soil, and the impacted life, will have tremendous benefits, SUCH AS MINIMIZING THE INCIDENCE OF “FIRE STORMS.”

No grant or subsidy money offered or given to Sonoma County by federal and state government agencies, corporations, or NGOs to do “the right thing” according to their agendas justifies putting the lives and property of Sonoma County residents at serious risk.

Consider that your inaction on the threat to all of us presented by Geoengineering Warfare can be considered “negligence” in fulfilling your duties of protecting the life and property of Sonomans that you swore to protect as an elected public official.

A very recent article (7/31/24) titled “Certain Dark Chocolates Contain High-Level Heavy Metals, Study Finds” indirectly exposes the contamination of food by the massive spraying of heavy metals (and other substances) by Geoengineering Warfare.

The article suggests that the sources of soil (and water) “contamination” are livestock manure, irrigation with wastewater or polluted water, application of sewage sludge, use of Metallo-pesticides or herbicides, phosphate-based fertilizers, and atmospheric deposition (chemtrails included?).

The case for “atmospheric deposition” likely being the primary source of contamination becomes even stronger when the article reports that for “unknown reasons”, organic cacao products had higher levels of heavy metals.  All the other listed possible sources of soil contamination, except livestock manure, do not apply to organic farming, so atmospheric deposition becomes the primary suspected source of the contamination.

As discussed in the article, lead and cadmium are the primary heavy metals tested in the study. Both are toxic nanomaterials used in Geoengineering, but they are just two of many others, such as aluminum, barium, strontium, vanadium, titanium, manganese, polymers, graphene, sulfuric acid, and surfactants.

And it is not just about chocolate: “Dark chocolate is just one potential source of heavy metal exposure in our diets. According to a 2019 review in Environmental International, a growing body of research has identified concerning levels of heavy metals in various food crops, including:

  • Fruits

  • Leafy vegetables—green cabbage, spinach, cauliflower, lettuce, kale

  • Root vegetables—radish, turnip, carrot

  • Wheat

  • Rice

  • Soybean

  • Corn

  • Garlic

Heavy metals are also potentially problematic in some marine fish, seafood,  herbal medicines, herbal teas, spices, fruit juice, and drinking water, particularly in areas with aging infrastructure or natural geological sources of contamination.”  (See link for highly referenced article and to take action)

_________________

**Comment**

This website has posted prolifically on geoengineering because it affects ALL life-forms on planet earth including the food we eat, which is medicine.

It appears that this geoengineering is also being used to relocate people from one area to another in something called ‘weather wars.’  Global governments admit to ‘cloud seeding,’ but not the fallout it causes.  The fallout is always blamed on ‘climate change,’

In a never-ending quest to destroy humanity, Bill Gates, who doesn’t vaccinate his own children but is hell-bent on vaccinating everyone else’s, also has a mission to ‘dim the sun,’ to supposedly counter the ‘climate emergency.’   Other schemes include stopping cows from farting and burping, limiting cars, and culling the ‘useless eaters.’  A few brave experts are telling the truth:

‘Climate change is a lie and a scam’ and green energy policies have made the climate worse – not to mention our health.

Category:

Activism, Climate, vaccines

Why Smart Meters Benefit Big Energy – Not Consumers

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/smart-meters-benefit-big-energy-not-consumers/?

Why Smart Meters Benefit Big Energy — Not Consumers

Energy companies are getting ever more heavy-handed in their tactics to meet quotas and hit govt net-zero targets. But who’s actually better off when we install a smart meter?

by Alliance for Natural Health International
November 6, 2024This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website.
woman thinking with smart meter and money

Increasingly, heavy-handed and even aggressive tactics are being adopted by energy companies to coerce the public into agreeing to the installation of smart meters.

Last weekend, United Kingdom (U.K.) energy provider, Octopus Energy, hit the headlines because it’s resorted to warning consumers that their existing analog meters have outlived their “best before date,” as if they were a food item.

They double down with fear tactics by implying that consumers are obligated under the law to replace a perfectly good meter. But it just isn’t so. The Alliance for Natural Health International’s executive coordinator, Meleni Aldridge, has been subject to such coercion from Octopus.

Deeply disappointing after years of providing excellent service and renewable energy, but the response was simply, to get a smart meter or find a new provider. So much for rewarding customer loyalty.

Such tactics are clearly being driven by government-imposed targets. As a result, the U.K. energy watchdog, Ofgem, is imposing punishing fines on companies not meeting installation targets.

In 2022 alone, energy companies in the U.K. that didn’t meet their targets agreed to pay Ofgem a total of 10.8 million pounds — of customers’ money!

How smart are smart meters?

According to a 2022 analysis by the U.S. organization, Mission:data Coalition, 97% of smart meters have failed to provide the customer savings originally promised in 2009.

A recent paper published in Cell Reports Physical Science blames the lack of savings on poor quality (= not so smart) data collected by smart meters.

In the U.K., for example, many households are experiencing overcharges and other issues due to smart meter faults, poor supplier management, and connectivity issues.

Technical issues and mismanagement by energy suppliers have led to a significant number of these meters not functioning correctly, leaving consumers unable to track their energy usage effectively and missing out on the potential savings and insights these devices are supposed to provide.

Added to this smart meters allow the energy companies to overcharge annually on top of what’s been used.

High-profile cases, such as artist Grayson Perry’s disputed bill increase from 300 to 39,000 pounds, spotlight the extreme consequences of not-so-smart meters. Consumers facing sudden spikes in their bills due to meter errors have seen little resolution, despite efforts to address these issues with energy suppliers.

The severe overcharging and billing errors raise concerns about whether the investment in smart meters is truly benefiting consumers.

In Canada, despite clever marketing techniques based on savings having persuaded consumers to make the switch to smart meters, “time-of-use” (TOU) tariffs have “backfired” as consumers have refused to change their consumption habits.

People have continued as normal and paid higher rates to use energy when they choose.

TOU tariffs are currently under consideration for introduction in the U.K. If they come in, energy companies will be able to charge different prices depending on the time of usage, the availability of so-called “green energy,” as well as the fluctuating cost of energy.

The big question is whether consumers will adapt and comply, or continue in a manner that befits their needs and lifestyle despite incurring higher costs.

The global smart meter market is currently valued at $24 billion and is projected to grow to a massive $77 billion by 2032.

But the truth is that early adopter countries are now facing significant bills to replace older technology that’s lost compatibility with evolving systems. Bills that are ultimately funded by us, the taxpayers.

In June 2024, 63% of all energy meters in the U.K. were “smart” or advanced meters. Despite the coercion and huge marketing budgets directed at convincing consumers to install the devices,  installation rates dropped by 11% as people became more and more distrusting of the technology.

The U.K. Department of Energy Security and Net Zero admits that 4 million devices aren’t working properly. However, independent research by The Money Saving Expert suggests that the figure could be significantly higher.

Smart and safe?

The safety or otherwise of smart meters still provokes heated debate, yet governments cling to those well-worn claims, “there are no health risks” and “smart meters are safe,” quoting industry-influenced studies along with guidelines from regulatory bodies, such as the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP).

ICNIRP, which had its 2020 guidelines called into question and had to call on the World Health Organization (WHO) to prop up its claims.

However, the situation is far more nuanced than we’re led to believe and many find themselves experiencing a range of, often debilitating, health issues following the installation of a smart meter.

Smart meters work by constantly streaming data back to the relevant energy company. In the U.K., newer devices use the smart metering communications network.

Potentially an individual household could end up with three smart meters — one each for electricity, gas and water if they have all of those services and they’re supplied by separate energy companies.

What we’re not told is that it’s the spikes of pulsed energy and not the average power density, that can cause health effects. Studies claiming there are no health harms only use data based on average power levels over a set period of time.

In a letter sent by scientists and health professionals to the North Carolina Utilities Commission, they explain that smart meters and cell phones occupy similar frequency bands of the electromagnetic spectrum, meaning that cell phone research can apply to smart meter radiofrequency radiation (RFR).

Smart meter RFR consists of frequent, very intense but very brief pulses throughout the day.

Because smart meter exposure over a 24-hour period can be very prolonged (pulses can average 9,600 times a day), and because there is building evidence that the sharp, high-intensity pulses are particularly harmful, the cell phone study findings are applicable when discussing adverse health impacts from smart meters.

A recent study shows that accumulated electromagnetic frequency, or EMF exposures, such as those from Wi-Fi, smart meters, mobile phones, cell towers and other such devices, even at low levels, are causing oxidative stress that affects our organs, and damages our immune system.

Not only do smart meters pose a risk to our health they’re also at risk of cyberattacks.

Big Brother in your home

Contrary to what was initially touted, significant amounts of data are actively collected by smart meters, which can be shared with third parties. All without your knowledge.

Not only that, in the U.K., the government has been considering making changes to the Smart Energy Code to allow energy suppliers to switch off power to high-usage electrical devices such as electric vehicle chargers and heating systems in an emergency situation.

It’s not a very big leap from there to using your energy supply as leverage for more social control. Much along the lines of China’s “social credit system” that rewards actions that “build trust in society” and penalizes the opposite.

And let’s not forget about the connection of more and more “smart” electrical devices to the Internet of Things. Reading and recording your every move in an increasingly surveilled, controlled and authoritarian world.

Smart up or pay up!

The race to convert all analog meters to smart meters globally is well and truly on. Almost a million homes in the U.K. now face having their cheap overnight electricity tariffs switched off unless they install a smart meter.

A 2023 U.K. Parliamentary report warns that around 7 million early smart meters will cease to function as older mobile networks (2G and 3G) are switched off.

In Australia, the Australian Energy Market Commission proposed a draft rule to fast-track smart meter installations.

The vast majority of responses (from individuals) to the ensuing consultation raised objections to the proposal, which was rammed through regardless, yet again, favoring industry and government agendas over people’s wishes.

In Ireland, the push is on to persuade unwary consumers with exhortations of safety and money saving, to agree to the installation of smart meters.

In 2022, French people refusing the installation of a smart meter were threatened with financial penalties.

However, not one European country has yet achieved a 100% installation rate of smart meters. One has to ask why they are such a positive asset.

Industry eyes are now turning to Asia as the next big market to target. It is yet to be seen how compliant these new markets will be.

Originally published by Alliance for Natural Health International.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.

Alliance for Natural Health International

The Alliance for Natural Health International is a non-profit organization with a mission to safeguard and promote natural and sustainable approaches to regenerating and managing human health worldwide.

This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Please consider subscribing to The Defender or donating to Children’s Health Defense.

For more:

Category:

Activism

Medical Journal Censorship is the Proximate Cause of the Covid Vaccine Catastrophe

https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/p/medical-journal-censorship-is-the?

Medical Journal Censorship Is The Proximate Cause of the Covid Vaccine Catastrophe

Here I document the brazen censoring behaviors of numerous major medical journals attempting to prop up the “safe and effective” narrative despite mountains of evidence to the contrary.

Pierre Kory, MD, MPA

Nov 11, 2024

In this post, I want to further the historical record of massive censoring actions by medical journals on the unprecedented adverse vaccine data of the Covid vaccines. A Midwestern Doctor, my colleague and friend, has done a masterful job of detailing that history in regard to small pox, polio, HPV and many other aspects of childhood vaccines. Never forget the Cutter incident, where officials covered up the fact they were distributing contaminated and deadly polio vaccines:

The Cutter incident was one of the worst pharmaceutical disasters in US history, and exposed several thousand children to live polio virus on vaccination.[3] The NIH Laboratory of Biologics Control, which had certified the Cutter polio vaccine, had received advance warnings of problems: in 1954, staff member Bernice Eddy had reported to her superiors that some inoculated monkeys had become paralyzed and provided photographs. William Sebrell, the director of NIH, rejected the report.[4]

The censoring of Eddy’s report led to:

  • 120,000 doses of polio vaccine that contained live polio virus.
  • 40,000 children recipients developed abortive poliomyelitis
  • 56 developed paralytic poliomyelitis—and of these, 5 children died from polio
  • exposures led to an epidemic of polio in the families and communities of the affected children, resulting in a further 113 people paralyzed and 5 deaths.

Thus, censorship of adverse vaccine data is not new but the deadly impacts of the polio vaccines is nowhere near the scope and scale of the current mRNA vaccine catastrophe.

Of those who, like me, started studying the dangers of Covid gene therapy “vaccines”, many then moved on to learn about the rest of the childhood vaccine schedule by reading “Turtles All The Way Down: Vaccine Science and Myth.  (See link for article)

_________________

**Comment**

Again, always look for those silver linings.

This article by Dr. Kory is a prime example.

It took millions of adverse reactions and deaths globally, but finally the tide has turned and many have awoken from their stupor to realize ‘vaccines’ are not ‘safe and effective.’

The article is long but critically highlights the insane censorship going on in the medical world.

I also highly recommend ‘Dissolving Illusions’ by Dr. Suzanne Humphries.  She went to primary sources and proves without a doubt the entire ‘vaccine’ paradigm is built on a house of cards.

Category:

Activism, vaccines

Lyme Disease is Quietly Debilitating Millions of Americans and Future Generations

https://www.newsweek.com/lyme-disease-quietly-debilitating-millions-americans-future-generations-opinion

Lyme Disease Is Quietly Debilitating Millions of Americans and Future Generations | Opinion

By Lindsay Keys

Co-Director of The Quiet Epidemic

It was May 2013 when I was diagnosed with “the summer flu.” I was bedridden with fevers, chills, and body aches. My hands, feet, and face started tingling, and I could no longer turn my head. It was my boss who first suggested I might have Lyme disease. A long-time resident of Martha’s Vineyard, she knew something I didn’t—the Vineyard is infested with ticks. Even still, I struggled to find a doctor who would treat me.

My health was eventually restored with a course of antibiotics. A year later, my hands and arms throbbed, followed by electric pain through my body and brain a year after that. I lost my ability to read, forgot how to get home from work, and every night, I journaled details of my life—desperate to remember who I was. I was in fierce denial that it was Lyme-related. According to mainstream doctors, I had been cured.

I was 26 years old when I had my first appointment with a Lyme specialist. The nurse asked how I was going to get through this, and I saw one way forward: leverage my passion for storytelling to create a documentary about Lyme. I needed a reason to live that was bigger than myself—to help others avoid this experience. The nurse connected me to another filmmaker, also diagnosed with Lyme—Winslow Crane-Murdoch—and we began co-directing The Quiet Epidemic.  (See link for article)

________________

**Comment**

And so it goes……another person infected with a complex illness that is denied by most doctors and the realization that we need a reason to live that is bigger than ourselves.

I can write this story by heart.

Important quote:

Our health agencies have failed to properly respond to this public health crisis for 50 years. We’re witnessing what happens when nothing is done. It’s time to involve our nation’s decision-makers on Capitol Hill.

Unfortunately, I do not believe involving our nation’s decision-makers is going to do squat.  Remember COVID?  Yeah, we are still being told it was a horrible pandemic and that the clot shots are ‘safe and effective.’

Nope.  They are not the answer.

It’s up to us.

For more:

http://  Approx. 5 Min

Willy Burgdorfer Ph.D. 2014

Toward the end of his life, Burgdorfer gave a telling interview.

  1. The Lyme organism can sequester in tissues.
  2. He feels the controversy in Lyme disease research is a shameful affair.
  3. ‘Money goes to the people that have for the past 30 years produced the same thing – nothing.’
  4. ‘Serology or serology-plus has to be started from scratch with people that don’t know beforehand the results of their research.’
  5. He also blames physicians as they are clueless and many won’t even touch a Lyme/MSIDS patient.

Category:

Activism, Lyme

It’s Official: RKI Leak & New Data Shows There Was No Pandemic

PCR inventor, Kari Mullis warned about PCR testing again and again:

The president of Tanzania punked the WHO by sending samples of fruit, coats, sheep, and even motor oil for COVID testing.  Nearly half came back positive.  Both boldly outspoken men died and are ‘conveniently’ no longer here to expose the lies.

Using all-cause mortality which is not susceptible to bias, researcher Denis Rancourt warned us there was no pandemic back in July 2023 and even before that in June, 2020 with his first report: All-Cause Mortality During COVID-19: N Plague & A Likely Signature of Mass Homicide By Government Response.

A 2020 study showed that if a PCR threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used the probability that the person is infected is less than 3%. Testing for COVID was declared an ‘Unmitigated Disaster’ back in Nov. 2021 when Italy reduced its COVID death toll by 97% after lowering the purposely high cycle threshold to an appropriate level.

The government knew.

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/dr-mike-yeadon-its-official-there?  Video Here (Approx. 31 min)

By Dr. Michael Yeadon November 10, 2024

This presentation by Prof Dr Stefan Homburg is devastating.

You may recall his analysis of files deliberately released by Germany’s Robert Koch Institute in summer 2024? These were official & heavily redacted. Still, they revealed extensive political control of what the public (& the courts) were told were independent experts.  [Go here for the story]

Now, there’s been a substantial leak from inside RKI of internal correspondence which tears apart any semblance of reality surrounding the pretend pandemic.

It’s official. There was no pandemic. No public health emergency. The hospitals were emptier than usual.

The entire scandalous episode, lasting years, was manufactured by named politicians.

If you still think there’s been a new, fast spreading disease which shut down the world and necessitated rushed (fake, dangerous) injections, I don’t know what to say to you.

Please – share this widely. Numerous politicians in the German government are named as bad actors in this RKI-Leak and this extended to NATO members.

Our sole defense against tyranny is to shine the disinfectant of sunlight upon it.

https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/rki-leak-file-download-brief-instructions

RKI Leak File Download – brief instructions

Sasha Latypova
Nov 11, 2024

Dear Readers,

This is a very brief post based on my previous article about the RKI Leak.

2000+ pages leaked form German CDC, Robert Koch Institute containing meeting minutes on covid from 2020-2023

Sasha Latypova
Nov 9
2000+ pages leaked form German CDC, Robert Koch Institute containing meeting minutes on covid from 2020-2023

Video on YouTube with links to download the 2000+ pages of the unredacted files from RKI.  Read full story

I received a lot of questions as there is a confusion on how to download the files. Here is step by step:

  1. In your browser, go to the link provided under the YouTube video:https://rki-transparenzbericht.de/
  2. The window will open with a widget showing several tabs. Select the English tab.
  3. Download zip file and unzip on your computer. It should contain 4 pdfs in English. Pdfs are searchable by keyword, or you can load them into something like Notebook LLM.

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/new-data-exposes-the-corruption-behind?

New Data Exposes the Corruption Behind the COVID Response

It’s time for COVID accountability so this can never happen again

A Midwestern Doctor
Nov 12, 2024

COVID-19 was arguably the worst public health disaster in history, and as more and more are now realizing, most of that could have been prevented if the medical industry had been less greedy throughout the pandemic and not put profits before people. Because of this, the unconditional trust the industry made enormous investments to create and has relied upon for decades has been shattered (e.g., a large JAMA study of 443,445 American adults found that in April 2020, 71.5% of them trusted doctors and hospitals while in January 2024, only 40.1% did)

Over the last month, I have received a large number of requests to highlight some of the egregious conduct by our healthcare authorities throughout the pandemic. At the time, it did not feel like the correct time to publish it, but now it does (e.g., something can be done about it).

In this article, I would like to focus on a few critical areas that need to exposed as we begin exploring the topic of COVID accountability—one of the key issues the Trump administration and the courts will have to address in the near future.

For more:

Category:

research, Testing, vaccines, Viruses