Madison Area Lyme Support Group

In a shocking report (Morens et al., 2023), Dr. Anthony Fauci, the former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), has raised dire concerns about the efficacy of mRNA vaccines in combating respiratory viruses. This statement marks a 180-degree turn away from previous statements and public health strategies that have heavily relied on mRNA technology to curb the spread of diseases like COVID-19.

“RETHINKING” After Attempting to Force-Vaccinate the Entire Population of the Planet

In January 2023, Fauci, and two colleagues, outlined concerns rooted in the interplay between respiratory viruses and the human immune system. Unlike systemic infections, they claim, respiratory viruses primarily replicate in the mucosal linings of the airways, posing unique challenges for vaccine-induced immunity. This, of course, is not true; the virus replicates in any cell with an ACE2 receptor, and the highest density of virus detected in the lining of the gut. But we’ll move on from Fauci’s inability to grasp the full scientific literature.

Here are the key arguments underpinning Fauci et al.’s reversed position:

1. Mucosal vs. Systemic Immunity: mRNA vaccines are designed to elicit systemic immune responses, primarily through the generation of neutralizing antibodies. However, respiratory viruses require a robust mucosal immune response for effective neutralization and clearance. Fauci and colleagues argue that mRNA vaccines, in their current form, do not adequately stimulate mucosal immunity, potentially limiting their effectiveness against respiratory pathogens.

2. Durability of Protection: Another concern they point to involves the duration of protection offered by mRNA vaccines. Respiratory viruses, including influenza and coronaviruses, exhibit high mutation rates, leading to the emergence of new variants. The implication is that mRNA vaccines may not provide long-lasting immunity against these ever-evolving threats, requiring frequent updates and booster shots. (*SMH*).

3. Immune Imprinting: The phenomenon of “original antigenic sin” or immune imprinting is also highlighted as a potential issue. This concept suggests that exposure to a specific viral strain via vaccination could bias the immune system’s response to future infections, making it less effective against different strains. While mRNA vaccines can be quickly updated, repeated vaccinations might reinforce this imprinting, potentially complicating responses to new variants.

Pardon me while I duct-tape my head to keep it from exploding.

(See link for article)

_______________

**Comment**

After admitting that the past and the present has yielded unsuccessful attempts to elicit solid protection against respiratory viruses, but conveniently leaving out adverse reactions and death, predictably, Fauci et al. conclude that “vaccine” research & development is the answer.  Translation: continue the narrative at all costs and use millions in tax-payer dollars under the guise of ‘public health’ for flu vaccines despite all evidence that they don’t work and never will.

Rather than espouse to the power of natural immunity and find effective treatments to support it, the authors are ‘excited’ to rethink all past assumptions and approaches and work to find bold new paths. Translation: ‘bold new paths’ myopically focuses on ‘vaccines’ and the continued narrative at all costs and uses millions in tax-payer dollars despite all evidence ‘vaccines’ fail to eradicate disease, and often cause harm and death, but we will slap the word ‘novel’ on it to make it sound scientific.

What are these bold new paths? 

• novel adjuvants
• novel delivery systems
• novel ‘vaccine’ platforms

Simply put: these mad scientists will not be happy until they use up all the taxpayer’s money for novel but ineffective ‘vaccines,’ and we are all 10 feet underground.  

Because humans inhale and ingest enormous quantities of exogenous proteins with every breath and mouthful, the respiratory and gastrointestinal immune compartments have evolved to deal with continual and massive antigenic assaults from the outside world.

Since mucosal and systemic immunity only partially protects against infection with mucosal respiratory viruses, we must take advantage of alternative host immune mechanisms….

Interestingly, the article mentions the 1918 Spanish Flu. What isn’t mentioned is the military experiment that attempted to infect soldiers with this acclaimed deadly virus by infecting their lung tissue from sick or deceased patients, putting infected tissue into their eyes and spraying it in their noses and throats, taking the blood from sick patients and injecting it directly into the healthy, standing over the sick and breathing in deeply as the sick coughed on them. 

Out of 300 subjects, NOBODY got the flu, or even got ill!

Yet, the mantra remains that a person who touches something with the virus on it and then touches his or her mouth, eyes or nose can become infected.

Interestingly at the time, the AMA advised up to 30 grams a day of aspirin causing aspirin poisoning, which causes hyperventilation and buildup of fluid in the lungs, and it’s now believed that many of the October deaths were actually caused or hastened by aspirin poisoning.

And so, history repeats itself.  

Similarly to the Spanish Flu, many claim COVID hasn’t been isolated, directly causes illness, is even a new disease, and that the deployed treatments have caused the very symptoms of the disease itself that have proven to be deadly. 

Coincidence?