Breaking News: Mathematica Policy Research Declares; “The Lie is Too Big to Confess”
Carl Tuttle
Hudson, NH, United States
MAR 3, 2023 —
The facts presented in this letter have always represented a real threat to the CDC’s business model/vaccine agenda so the truth has been suppressed/distorted for decades to promote the false Lyme disease narrative; “Hard to catch and easily treated”
A chronic relapsing seronegative disease does not fit the vaccine model.
Mathematica Policy Research has been contracted by the CDC. (See previous Petition Updates)
Breaking News: Mathematica Policy Research Declares; “The Lie is Too Big to Confess”
Mathematica Policy Research will obey the CDC’s Lyme disease narrative and ignore any evidence of persistent infection following the IDSA’s one-size-fits-all treatment guideline (soon to be mandate) and continue the fixation on the acute stage of infection after early treatment hiding the horribly disabled who missed the narrow window of opportunity (30 days) for successful short-term treatment.Disallowing the following:
Evidence of seronegative Lyme disease (no antibody production to active disease)
ABSOLUTELY no discussion allowed on the failed OspA LYMErix vaccine
About Mathematica Policy Research https://www.appam.org/spotlight-mathematica-policy-research Considered an architect of social policy research, Mathematica Policy Research provides expert design and evaluation to guide decision-making that improves public well-being. For more than four decades, the employee-owned company has been at the forefront of assessing the effectiveness of policies and programs.
______________________________________________
Notice to the reader: Although this article has not been published in any news outlet and is a satirical viewpoint of the CDC/Mathematica relationship it contains factual information and should be taken seriously since a Lyme vaccine is in the pipeline. All of what we have just experienced through Covid looks to repeat itself: false narrative, censorship of the truth, facts and scientific references, physicians being censured and certainly we do not want the public to believe that long-term antibiotic treatment is an alternative to the new “safe and effective” Pfizer Lyme vaccine.
Similarly to the thinking doctors who created The Great Barrington Declaration, The World Council for Health has created a better way forward that respects doctor and patient rights and choice, protects national sovereignty, and decentralizes power that is currently being used against people and which will only worsen if the WHO is given all power. I highly recommend reading the entire article below in the link to learn more.
There is a better way and it isn’t giving ultimate power and authority to unelected globalists with zero oversight or accountability.
Public health authorities clearly appeared to be operating in lockstep, ignoring the evidence, rubbishing safe, integrative treatments for Covid, and pushing for a single solution to the crisis: that of the novel, Covid-19 gene-based injections. A calculated propaganda campaign included censorship of any evidence-based perspective that challenged the agenda, and emotional manipulation that replaced informed consent with coercion.
It has since become starkly clear that the so-called pandemic has been a Trojan Horse for unelected bodies to push their dystopian vision of a centralised, one-world system of government. In terms of health, the WHO’s proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations and Pandemic Treaty/Accord/Instrument threaten to undermine the individual’s inalienable rights and would see member nations handing over health policies to the WHO: an unelected, majority privately funded organisation. (Go to link for article and the WCH’s better way)
_______________
The following article explains the ideas behind The Great Reset and The Pandemic Treaty – both of which are the brainchildren of globalist thinking whose goal is to solidify corporate control over governments of the world. This 30 minute video ties together the ideology, historical facts, and pertinent leaders. Highly recommend.
Whitney Webb explains the WEF’s mission to solidify corporate control over governments of the world.
Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
Investigative journalist Whitney Webb reveals the inner workings of the World Economic Forum (WEF), the driving force behind The Great Reset
Beneath WEF’s benevolent surface, it becomes clear that corporatism and, more aptly, fascism, are its modus operandi
WEF’s Board of Trustees is packed with powerful and prominent representatives from government and multinational corporations like BlackRock, Salesforce and Nestlé
WEF supports the “merging of man and machine,” or transhumanism, and its Fourth Industrial Revolution aims to use wearable and implantable technology to surveil your thoughts and launch a digital dictatorship
Once implemented, a digital dictator ship will be almost impossible to escape from; one way to stop it is to not comply or utilize these technologies
Curious about the inner workings of the World Economic Forum (WEF), the driving force behind The Great Reset? Set aside 30 minutes to watch investigative journalist Whitney Webb speak with MintPress News in the video above.1 Every year in January, WEF holds its annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland.
The 2023 theme was “cooperation in a fragmented world,” with WEF noting, “The world today is at a critical inflection point. The sheer number of ongoing crises calls for bold collective action.”2
Their actions, however, while carefully packaged to appear altruistic — and steeped in warm-and-fuzzy buzzwords like “green” and “sustainable” — will ultimately propel its small circle further into power while all but guaranteeing a downtrodden populace. If you so much as dip your finger beneath WEF’s surface, it becomes clear that corporatism and, more aptly, fascism, are its modus operandi. (See link for article)
**Learn about Klaus Schwab’s ’15-minute cities’ urban plan which limits people’s travel to within 15 minutes of their homes – kind of like the Hunger Games where you stay within your district.**
The WHO laid out its plans for global vaccine passports in a series of proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005) — a legally binding instrument that imposes various conditions on 196 countries when the WHO declares certain types of health emergencies.
As governments around the world wind down their vaccine passport programs, the unelected World Health Organization (WHO) is attempting to make this Covid-era surveillance tech permanent and global.
The movement to amend these International Health Regulations (IHR) began in January last year when the Biden administration quietly pushed for major changes. Since this initial push, other member states have proposed their own amendments and the total number of proposed changes now sits at 307.
These proposed amendments give the WHO new powers to declare “potential” health emergencies and include commitments from member states to recognize the WHO as the “coordinating authority” during certain types of health emergencies.
They also outline how the WHO intends to use its new powers to push global vaccine passports when it declares “potential or actual” health emergencies. (See link for article)
New text has been added forcing member states to require “documents containing information for a lab test in digital or physical format” and “information on vaccination against a disease.” It also appears paper and/or digital record keeping with be used for contacttracing.
Another amendment requires testand recovery certificates.
These digital documents will need to be verified as authentic from an “official” website suggesting QR codes.
At minimum, WHO wants everyone’s name, national identity number, passport number, type of vaccine, vaccine batch number, date of administration, place of administration, and an official stamp.
At maximum WHO wants all of the data from the minimum scenario plus a person’s vaccination history and a QR code that supports the retrieval of vaccination information.
Their next meeting will be held from April 17 till April 20.
The amendments are expected to be finalized by May 2024 and will be adopted under Article 21 of the WHO Constitution which doesn’t state how many votes are needed to amend regulations, but many of the votes will be cast by diplomats who are appointed and not elected.
If finalized member states will be given “due notice” and have a six-month window to reject them before they come into force.
“Pandemic Treaty” will hand WHO keys to global government
Suggested clauses would incentivize reporting “pandemics”, and see nations punished for “non-compliance”
Kit Knightly
4/19/22
Excerpt on mainstream media’s stance:
…the signs are that what scant press coverage there is, mostly across the metaphorical back-pages of the internet, will be focused on making the treaty “strong enough”and ensuring national governments can be “held accountable”.
For this treaty to have teeth, the organisation that governs it needs to have the power – either political or legal – to enforce compliance.
In its current form, the WHO does not possess such powers […]To move on with the treaty, WHO therefore needs to be empowered — financially, and politically.
Two African countries – Burundi and Tanzania – had Presidents who banned the WHO from their borders, and refused to go along with the Pandemic narrative. Both Presidents died unexpectedly within months of that decision, only to be replaced by new Presidents who instantly reversed their predecessor’s covid policies.
Just five months after the death of President John Magufuli, the new government of Tanzania received 600 million dollars from the IMF to “address the covid19 pandemic”.
It’s pretty clear what happened here, isn’t it?
Globalists backed coups and rewarded the perpetrators with “international aid”. The proposals for the Pandemic treaty would simply legitimise this process, moving it from covert back channels to overt official ones. (See link for article)
_______________
**Comment**
Although this article is a year old, it’s a pertinent reminder that COVID has already changed the playing field, giving globalists and unelected groups like the WHO and the WEF far too much power with no oversight or accountability. Now, these groups want yet more power.
This is the very definition of technocratic globalism.
‘Let Everybody Read It’: Senate Votes to Declassify U.S. Intelligence on COVID Origins
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), co-sponsor of a bill that would require the Biden administration to declassify all intelligence and documentation related to the origins of COVID-19, said “it’s past time” to show the American people what the government has.
The U.S. Senate on Wednesday unanimously passed a bill that would require the Biden administration to declassify all intelligence and documentation related to the origins of COVID-19.
The COVID-19 Origin Act of 2023 was introduced by Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Sen. Mike Braun (R-Ind.). It passed via unanimous consent, as proposed by Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio).
Congress uses unanimous consent to quickly decide issues without taking a vote.
The bill will now go to the House of Representatives, where the Republican majority has indicated they will pass the bill.
House Democrats oppose the bill, arguing the executive branch, and not the legislative branch, should make decisions concerning the declassification of intelligence documents.
Declassifying COVID Origin Reports Would Open ‘Pandora’s Box’
Congresswoman Kat Cammack says it best: declassifying this intel would require action on the current administration regarding China, funding sources for NIH, CDC, WHO, FDA, and collusion between the admin and social media companies who censored dissenters and so much more.
_______________
**Comment**
You know it’s bad when Republicans and Democrats vote unanimously to declassify these intelligence reports, but the Biden Administration is still hemming it over.
Leaked UK Government Messages Reveal Plans for Lockdowns
Including Destroying All Pets
British politicians are in damage control after leaked WhatsApp messages from a British politician gives us insight to how the government made lockdown and school closure policies: based on personal sentiment and politics. The damning texts prompted one official to say that they once considered killing all pets but didn’t do that so we can all just calm down about the measures they did put in place.
The messages come from Matt Hancock, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care from 2018 to 2021 who resigned after breaking lockdowns to have an affair with an aide. Just three months later he was given a prestigious UN job advising Africannations on how to bounce back after the pandemic.
Hancock handed his messages over to British political journalist Isabel Oakeshott to help her ghostwrite his book, “Pandemic Diaries,” but in breach of a non-disclosure agreement, Oakeshott leaked all of the WhatsApp messages to The Telegraph.
While some messages are simply derogatory banter, others show Hancock:
sought favorable coverage from past political colleagues who worked in media
gave police officers their “marching orders” to enforce lockdown measures, while claiming in public that the police were operationally independent of the government
Derbyshire Police were admonished for using “sinister” drones to monitor ramblers in the Peak District
then they dyed a blue lagoon black “to make the water look less appealing”
Neil Basu, then the Met Police assistant commissioner, warned in this newspaper “how we police this pandemic will be remembered for many years to come.”
police in England and Wales processed a total of 118,000 fines under Covid rules up to February 2022.
“It has, in fact, taken a team of eight investigative journalists, the best part of two months, to sift through all this stuff.
It seemed to me that there was really no other option but to put it out there.
Can you imagine any journalist worth the name journalist that sat on material like that. “Even though I knew that I risked being sued and that I would, of course, be accused of a breach of trust.” ~ Isabel Oakeshott
Why Matt Hancock’s WhatsApp messages were revealed by The Telegraph | The Lockdown Files
Associate Editor, Camilla Tominey, reveals how The Telegraph came to the decision to publish Matt Hancock’s WhattsApp messages as part of The Lockdown Files.
‘In the interest of openness, transparency and accountability, the public has a right to know what went on behind the scenes‘.
The Telegraph has been handed more than 100,000 messages linked to Mr Hancock’s time as health secretary at the height of the pandemic. Some of texts show Matt Hancock rejecting the Chief Medical Officer’s advice to test for Covid all residents going into English care homes, Prof Sir Chris Whitty told the then health secretary early in April 2020, about a month into the pandemic, that there should be testing for “all going into care homes.” But Mr Hancock did not follow that guidance, telling his advisers that it “muddies the waters.” Instead, he introduced guidance that made testing mandatory for those entering care homes from hospital, but not for those coming from the community. Prior to the guidance, care homes had been told that negative tests were not required even for hospital patients. The guidance stating that those coming in from the community should be tested was eventually introduced on Aug 14.
Between April 17 and August 13, 2020, a total of 17,678 people died of Covid in care homes in England.
The Case Against The FDA For Their Illegal Anti-Ivermectin Actions
The case brought by Drs. Paul Marik, Mary Bowden, and Robert Apter is now at the Court of Appeals. I was interviewed for this awesome Federalist article today where I landed some powerful blows.
I am very happy about the coverage our case received today in the below Federalist article which can also be found here. I say “our” case because not only does it affect everyone, but also because the FLCCC, the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, and America’s Front-Line Doctors all submitted amicus briefs in support of the plaintiffs. The journalist totally understood how dangerous it is to concentrate so much power in a single Federal government agency (as well as the Federal government in general). The article was published under the Medical Ethics section of the paper and like I said, I am pretty proud of the quotes she decided to include. I think I will read it again I enjoyed it so much! Here it is:
Will this wrongful death lawsuit finally come to trial?
March 3, 2023
Investigative reporter Mary Beth Pfeiffer posted the following on her Facebook page on March 3.
On Aug. 5, 2013, Joseph Elone, 17, died of Lyme carditis, soon after spending two weeks at a summer camp in Rhode Island. Lyme tests were negative; no rash was found, and he was not treated with antibiotics that would have saved his life.
Nearly a decade later, a wrongful death lawsuit filed by his family in 2015 may finally go to trial, according to a judge’s firmly worded order on Feb. 23. More than 300 documents have been filed so far. Something is going to come of this lawsuit or it would not have survived this long. I hope so.
Beyond the delays that have plagued the case, another injustice persists. What happened to Joseph could happen again today. Lyme tests still fail often in early disease, and doctors are discouraged from treating without a positive test or visible rash.
I wrote about Joseph for the Poughkeepsie Journal and in my book; his story was also told in the play, “The Little Things.” For his family, I hope closure and change comes.
Madison Area Lyme Support Group 