Man holding head, looking tired from post treatment lyme disease

In a recent editorial, Dr. Allen Steere describes the clinical features and proposed mechanisms triggering what he believes are 4 distinct post-treatment Lyme disease syndromes (PTLDS) in patients who fail antibiotic treatment for Lyme disease. [1]

Individuals who suffer from persistent symptoms may be diagnosed with post-treatment Lyme disease or ‘chronic Lyme disease.’  Studies estimate that between 34% and 62% of patients continue to have ongoing, chronic symptoms even after standard antibiotic therapy. Many remain ill for months to years. In fact, according to one study, 34% of a population-based, retrospective cohort were still ill an average of 6.2 years after antibiotic treatment.

Additionally, four clinical trials, sponsored by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), demonstrated the potential seriousness of Lyme disease. According to the findings, the quality of life for chronically ill patients “was equivalent to that of patients with congestive heart failure; pain levels were similar to those of post-surgical patients and fatigue was on par with that seen in multiple sclerosis.”

In his editorial, “Post-treatment Lyme disease syndromes: distinct pathogenesis caused by maladaptive host responses,” Steere concedes that patients can remain seriously ill. “These patients may have severe pain around joints (tender points), headache, brain fog, sleep disorder, and incapacitating fatigue, which have a major impact on the quality of life.”

“Physicians are often in a quandary regarding whether these patients still have active infection or postinfectious phenomena,” he writes.

Unfortunately, Steere dismisses the hypothesis that a persistent and active infection could be causing ongoing illness in patients with ‘chronic Lyme disease’ or post-treatment Lyme disease syndrome, as he claims, there is a “current lack of evidence of persistent infection or antibiotic efficacy in human patients with PTLDS.” (A statement which I dispute.)

Instead, he has developed and proposes that patients suffer from various post-infectious syndromes, which include:

Post-infectious Lyme arthritis

“Massive inflammatory, synovial proliferation usually affecting a knee, emerging from Lyme arthritis.”

  • Pathogenesis: Excessive pro-inflammatory immune response with high IFN-γ levels persistent in the post-infectious period, blocking appropriate wound repair processes.

Post-treatment Lyme disease syndrome

“Pain, neurocognitive, and fatigue symptoms emerging after any LD [Lyme disease] manifestation.”

Autoimmune joint disease

“Rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, or peripheral spondyloarthropathy emerging after any LD [Lyme disease] manifestation.”

  • Pathogenesis: Adjuvant effect of infection activating latent autoimmune disease.

Autoimmune neurologic disease

“Chronic idiopathic demyelinating polyneuropathy emerging from Lyme radiculoneuropathy.”

  • Pathogenesis: Unknown.

Steere points out, that individuals with systemic autoimmune diseases following Lyme disease may benefit from immunosuppressive or anti-inflammatory therapy.

He concludes, “disabling posttreatment syndromes may still develop, which appear to result primarily from disadvantageous or maladaptive host responses to the infection that persist after spirochetal killing with antibiotics.”

Editor’s note: I do not agree with Dr. Steere’s position. And for transparency purposes, I’m an author of the International Lyme and Associated Diseases Society (ILADS) guidelines, which does not dismiss the persistent infection hypothesis but supports ongoing antimicrobial treatment until Lyme disease symptoms resolve.
  1. Steere AC. Posttreatment Lyme disease syndromes: distinct pathogenesis caused by maladaptive host responses. J Clin Invest. 2020;130(5):2148-2151.



This would almost be humorous if it wasn’t so serious.  

Having just read Polly Murray’s “The Widing Circle,” and revisiting the beginning of it all from the woman who contacted health authorities to report on a mysterious illness afflicting her entire household and a majority of her neighbors, I realize that very little has changed.

40 years ago, Murray was frustrated with Steere’s stubborn refusal to acknowledge the persistent infection that seemed to affect so many patients.

I was also shocked anew at these authorities who often preferred sitting back to observe suffering patientsrather than treat them.  Nearly all responded that were able to receive continuing treatment.  I wrote about our experience here:

I hesitate to think where we would be now without this life-saving treatment that took over 5 years.

For more:  

I highly recommend bypassing mainstream medicine completely and heading directly to a Lyme literate doctor:

The Lyme War continues unabated.

%d bloggers like this: