Archive for November, 2020

What Makes a Doctor Lyme Literate?

https://igenex.com/tick-talk/what-makes-a-doctor-lyme-literate/

What Makes a Doctor Lyme Literate?

One of the most common pieces of advice for Lyme patients is to find a Lyme-literate doctor (LLMD) who can give an accurate Lyme disease diagnosis and provide the appropriate care. But what does that actually mean? What makes a doctor Lyme literate?

A quick Google search makes this question seem harder to answer than it really is. This blog intends to clear up misconceptions about what a Lyme-literate doctor is and isn’t so that you can find the quality care you need.

But first – who needs a Lyme literate doctor?

In an ideal world, a Lyme disease diagnosis would be straightforward for any physician. You would notice symptoms soon after a tick bite and immediately make a doctor’s appointment. Your doctor would note your symptoms and give you a blood test. The test would come up positive, showing the disease in your system. Your doctor would then prescribe antibiotics, and your disease would clear up completely.

Unfortunately, for many people, resolving a case of Lyme disease is not so simple. In fact, just getting the right diagnosis in the first place can be a challenge. Problems with the currently recommended diagnostic testing, plus the challenging nature of identifying Lyme disease symptoms – which are often non-specific or similar to those of other diseases, especially the farther along the infection is – all make getting a Lyme disease diagnosis and treatment difficult for many patients.

Some people seek out Lyme-literate doctors after years of receiving inaccurate or unhelpful diagnoses and treatments that don’t make their symptoms go away. These may be patients with late stage Lyme, chronic Lyme, or even Post-Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome (PTLDS). Others know they are at risk of Lyme disease – for example, if they found a tick on them – and seek out a Lyme-literate doctor who they know will be able to accurately interpret their symptoms and test results.

In other words, patients who aren’t able to get the answers or relief they need from other specialists often seek out the care of a Lyme-literate doctor.

Now, what actually makes a doctor Lyme literate? There are a few skills, qualifications, and characteristics you should look for.

A Lyme literate doctor:

…is familiar with the vast range of signs and symptoms that may indicate Lyme disease at various stages.

Lyme disease is one of the trickiest infectious diseases to diagnose. One reason for this is its non-specific symptoms that mimic those of other diseases, such as:

  • Fever and chills
  • Muscle aches
  • Joint aches
  • Fatigue or shortness of breath (especially in later stages)
  • Heart arrhythmia (especially at later stages)

Misconceptions about what Lyme looks like can complicate the diagnostic process for physicians who don’t have sufficient experience with Lyme. For example, many people believe you can’t have Lyme disease if you don’t have the characteristic bull’s eye rash (erythema migrans). However, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention note that this rash only shows up in 70-80% of patients. Dismissing a patient because they don’t have the rash can lead to missed or misdiagnosis.

LLMDs have become experts in Lyme disease based on years of experience working with Lyme patients. Many are not infectious disease doctors, but come from a range of backgrounds. By working closely with and treating Lyme patients over the years, they learn to recognize the tricky signs and symptoms of the disease. Some even use that expertise to train other LLMDs.

…is familiar with the coinfections that may be present with Lyme.

Lyme disease is only one of many tick-borne diseases active in the U.S. Many of these diseases crop up as coinfections of Lyme, which can interfere with the diagnostic process and treatment if the proper tests aren’t used or interpreted correctly. A Lyme-literate doctor would be prepared for these challenges.

…may be listed on one of the Lyme-literate doctor directories.

There are several resources at your disposal that can connect you with doctors who can recognize and treat Lyme disease. These directories include medical professionals who are members of organizations dedicated to fighting Lyme, including:

Note: Some of these organizations may require you to submit a form or create a login to access their databases.

In addition, you may also want to explore organizations and support groups that can connect you with other patients in the Lyme community, such as:

…has positive reviews or testimonials from other Lyme patients.

It’s important to do plenty of research to make sure you’re finding the right fit before spending precious time and money on diagnostics and treatment. Get as much information as you can about any doctor you’re considering by reading reviews or testimonials from other patients. If possible, get word-of-mouth or doctor referrals.

…is open-minded and willing to listen to your experiences.

There are many reasons a doctor might not be able to give a patient an accurate Lyme disease diagnosis, and they’re not all malicious.

For example, Lyme disease is not well taught in medical school, leaving many physicians in the dark when Lyme patients show up at their offices.  Another barrier to Lyme expertise is the controversial nature of Lyme disease. Many physicians – even ones who want to do right by their patients – are fearful of retribution from IDSA. This, combined with a simple lack of knowledge or experience, can make doctors overly cautious, unable to consider the possibility of Lyme, or even ill-equipped to use or interpret the proper diagnostic tests.

It’s a little like taking your car to the shop: you wouldn’t take your Toyota to a BMW dealer and expect them to be able to fix your engine. For the same reason, if your pediatrician does not have enough experience with Lyme in children, they might not be the best person to deal with your child’s Lyme.

Lyme-literate doctors, on the other hand, are both knowledgeable and open-minded enough to see the meaning in your experiences and symptoms, and thus willing to pursue the most up to date testing and appropriate treatment.

A Lyme-literate doctor is NOT:

…a “quack” or “fake” doctor.

There is a misconception that Lyme-literate doctors aren’t “real” doctors. While bad actors do exist in any field, true Lyme-literate doctors are licensed medical professionals who use their experience with Lyme disease to help patients with Lyme or other tick-borne diseases.

These can be infectious disease specialists, but do not have to be. An LLMD just needs to have extensive experience with Lyme disease, Lyme patients, and common coinfections. One way to vet doctors who may be able to help you is to find out, if possible, the percentage of their patient base that are Lyme patients.

Using the directories listed above, as well as trusted testimonials, can help you find licensed health care providers with the proper credentials. Your primary care doctor may even be able to refer you to a LLMD.

In sum:

A Lyme-literate doctor is simply a professional, licensed physician who has the knowledge, experience, and open mind required to help patients with the symptoms and complications of Lyme disease. It’s more important than ever for more physicians to become Lyme literate and/or for LLMDs to share their expertise by training other doctors. All too many patients must travel long distances, perform extensive research, or incur high costs to find LLMDs who can give them the answers and treatment they need.

To learn more about how to find a Lyme-literate doctor who can help with your illness, read IGeneX’s blog on the subject or post a question on the IGeneX Facebook page. If you’d like to know more about what kinds of tests these doctors may use, you can also check out IGeneX’s tests for Lyme and other tick-borne diseases. Getting the right testing and care from the right physician is key to overcoming your tick-borne disease.

_______________________

**Comment**

Great information.

A few points:

  1. Due to the poor doctor education on Tick-borne illness (TBI) as well as the continued polarization within mainstream medicine (and the media’s regurgitation of propaganda) on this complex illness, I would bypass mainstream medicine (MSM) altogether unless you are lucky enough to see a tick dangling from your arm with a blatant EM rash – which in and of itself is diagnostic for LD – no testing required.  I’ve had patients tell me even when they tested positive 3 times, mainstream doctors told them it was a “false positive” and they weren’t infected!  Mainstream medical doctors would rather diagnose you with ANYTHING other than TBI.
  2. The abuse patients experience from MSM is very real & happens frequently:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/01/11/sick-shaming-of-lymemsids-patients/ 
  3. Those getting the EM rash is far less than what the CDC states:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/02/22/why-mainstream-lyme-msids-research-remains-in-the-dark-ages/  Research shows it to be highly variable (25-80%).  
  4. It isn’t just patients who are abused.  Lyme literate doctors (LLMDs) are also hunted down, persecuted, and vilified:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/06/14/corruption-human-rights-violations-against-lyme-doctors-scientists-and-parents-now-on-united-nations-record/
  5. The PTLDS moniker is damaging patients because the denial of evidence showing persistent Lyme infection and is a critical obstacle to adequate treatment:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/08/13/slyme-an-interview-we-need-to-drop-the-term-ptld-like-a-bad-habit/
  6. Finding a LLMD is a bit of a gauntlet.  Your best resource is your local support group.  These patients have first-hand knowledge of these doctors, their fee structure, their treatment regimen as well as their personality.  Also, it isn’t uncommon to switch doctors – even numerous times or to need more than one.  This complex illness is very challenging to treat and sometimes you just have to seek out more than one doctor.  I do encourage you; however, to stick with a plan/doctor as long as you can before changing as this does take considerable time to treat.  While you may experience improvement, this is relapsing in nature.  You can have periods where you plateau and need to switch meds/approach up and try different things.  I felt like quitting my doctor 1,000 times but I’m glad I didn’t.  This is unlike anything you’ve ever treated before and at times you question your own sanity.  Normal.  Been there, done that.

HANG TOUGH AND NEVER, EVER QUIT!

Genetic Variations Make Lyme Harder To Treat

https://www.lymedisease.org/zelener-comment-tbdwg-nov17/

Genetic variations make Lyme harder to treat

Family’s Reoccurring Strep – & Pet Cat

https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/medical-mysteries/this-familys-repeated-strep-throat-infections-frustrated-their-doctors/2020/05/22/

This family’s repeated strep throat infections frustrated their doctors

By  Sandra G. Boodman

May 23, 2020

When Dan Levitis, his wife, Iris, and their three young children trooped into a Madison, Wis., urgent care clinic around 8 a.m. on New Year’s Day 2018, the staff didn’t seem surprised to see them. The family had sought treatment several times in the previous two months for recurrent strep throat infections.

They had taken multiple rounds of drugs, professionally deep cleaned their home and replaced contaminated toothbrushes, but none of it worked for long. Inevitably, the infection came roaring back.  (See link for article)

______________________

**Comment**

A very intriguing case.  Important excerpts:

Levitis called his mother, a retired pediatrician who had practiced in suburban Maryland, for advice. She told him about a family she had seen who kept getting strep until they got rid of their pet cat.

While a report from the American Veterinary Medical Association states that doctors sometimes blame pets for recurrent strep throat infections, “evidence doesn’t support this.”

To the surprise of the vet school faculty, group A strep was found in the cat’s throat; it appeared to match the strain of strep collected during Levitis’s most recent throat culture.

This case shows that clinical doctors often know things medical associations don’t!

The family went on vacation, (all treated with antibiotics) and their house was professionally cleaned for the second time, while the asymptomatic cat was also given antibiotics and disinfectant spray for his fur, which finally put a stop to the endless strep infections.

Due to the denial of most of the doctors and their corresponding unwillingness to swab the cat’s throat, this case almost went unsolved.  Food for thought, and another reminder to be willing to fight for answers.

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/01/29/woman-links-lyme-disease-diagnosis-to-pet-cat-sleeping-in-bed/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/05/28/woman-wakes-up-with-black-eye-swollen-face-after-cat-scratch-that-left-her-on-iv-drip-for-four-days/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/07/14/woman-killed-from-lethal-bacteria-after-cat-licked-her/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/06/28/cat-scratch-disease-vet-suffers-extreme-fatigue-for-a-decade-after-catching-rare-severe-case-of-bartonella-infection-that-isnt-rare/

These articles are just the tip of the ice-berg.  I hope this makes it crystal clear that Bartonella is NOT RARE!

Media Hypes Unproven COVID Vaccines

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/media-hypes-modernas-covid-vaccine-downplays-risks/  By Children’s Health Defense Team

Excerpts from article:

  • On Monday, Moderna announced that its mRNA-1273 COVID vaccine candidate was 94.5% effective, based on interim Phase 3 trial data.

  • Last week Pfizer announced that analysis of preliminary Phase 3 trial data indicated its BNT162b2 COVID vaccine, developed in partnership with Germany’s BioNTech, was “more than 90% effective.”

Both announcements came in the form of press releases — with neither company providing the actual data behind their claims.

In short, neither company can state if and how long the vaccine will provide protection, yet they are seeking EUA status from the FDA, which BTW will allow them to skip standard safety and compliance standards.  Isn’t that nice?

The press release caused stock to rise yet according to STAT:

“Every Tuesday Moderna’s top doctor gets about $1million richer” by selling his existing stock like clockwork through pre-scheduled trades, “earning him more than $50 million since the dawn of the pandemic.

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla also sold $5.6 million of Pfizer stock on the same day the vaccine maker made its “90% effective” announcement.

The article then points out that a high amount of ADRs are expected, which I posted about here:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/11/14/pfizer-covid-vaccine-frenzy-high-volume-of-adverse-reactions-expected/

The vaccine by Moderna:

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pfizer-vaccine-claim-unsubstantiated-peer-review-journals-who/  By  Rob Verkerk PhD

In this article, the author points out that Pfizer’s claim that its vaccine is 90% effective is unsubstantiated by Peer-reviewed journals and the WHO. Since it is excluded from Operation Warp Speed it didn’t need to share its data to a monitoring committee.

Further, press released statements don’t prove anything.

Evidently, Pfizer’s Phase 3 trial was reported on my an “external, anonymous independent Data Monitoring Committee (DMC)” which according to the Kaiser Family Foundation is anything but independent.  Source: article 

This report on the interim study results simply can not be found.

The author points out that the press release points to unknowns such as the possibility that some of the confirmed cases could be other coronaviruses that have triggered immunogenicity which means results are either false positives OR COVID-19 viral fragments, as well as the fact these dead viral fragments triggering immunogenic reactions could not have caused infection anyway.

Peter Doshi, an associated editor of the BMJ and also associate professor of pharmaceutical health services at the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, “The lack of data is very concerning … All we have right now is a headline by Pfizer.”

And then there’s that needling issue about risk of vaccine harm such as triggering autoimmune conditions which can not be detected in the study’s few months of reporting, as well as the fact the vaccine might fail to be effective just a few months after the second dose.

Verkerk goes onto question governments’ risk-cost-benefit analysis justifying the rollout of these vaccines.  There are effective treatments, and herd immunity is very real and attainable:

For more on this:  

Excerpt:

  1. Firstly, it was wrong to claim that this virus was novel.
  2. Secondly, It was even more wrong to claim that the population would not already have some immunity against this virus.
  3. Thirdly, it was the crowning of stupidity to claim that someone could have Covid-19 without any symptoms at all or even to pass the disease along without showing any symptoms whatsoever.

Canadian TV Series About Lyme Disease – “Bitten”

https://www.ctvnews.ca/mobile/w5/promising-treatment-brings-new-hope-for-patients-with-chronic-lyme-disease-  News videos here

Promising treatment brings new hope for patients with chronic Lyme disease

W5 Producer
Published Friday, November 20, 2020 
W5’s Molly Thomas speaks to a Canadian Lyme disease patient who had to struggle for years just to get a diagnosis.
There are more ticks in Canada than ever before, but is the country’s health care system prepared to deal with more Lyme disease cases?
Nikki Kent had to go through a battery of tests and years of uncertainty before she was finally diagnosed with Lyme disease.
____________________________
**Comment**
Informative Canadian news series on Lyme disease.
The series looks at a number of Canadian Lyme patients that have had trouble obtaining diagnosis and treatment in Canada, necessitating they travel thousands of miles to the United States.
The series points out the:
There is a myth still being perpetrated in the medical community on the effectiveness of 1 or 2 doses of doxycycline:

Daniel J. Cameron, MD MPH, states there has only been one study (Nadelman et al) on the effectiveness of 1 pill of doxycycline and only found a reduction in the number of erythema migraines (EM) rashes compared to the placebo group.  According to him, the IDSA 1 pill of doxy approach started in 2006 despite the fact that three previous prophylactic antibiotic trials for a tick bite had failed.

Only one study in 2001 tested this hypothesis at one hospital in New York.

For the study, the bullseye rash was the diagnostic criteria to determine if doxy prevented LD. The study actually showed that people bitten by nymphs were more likely to develop a bullseye rash and therefore diagnosed with LD in comparison with those bitten by an adult tick. None of those bitten by adult ticks developed a bullseye rash.

The Bullseye is a poor indicator of LD.

Only 50% with LD got any kind of rash and only 9% developed a bullseye.

Two pills used at the time of tick bite by a nymph prevented people from getting the bullseye – so they were not diagnosed as having LDand were excluded from the study.

So, will 2 pills of doxy prevent Lyme?

No.

So much for evidence based medicine.
The article in the top link then goes onto discuss Dr. Tim Cook who has had success using disulfiram/Antabuse.  He quotes:
“OK, now this is exciting,” he said. “Disulfram (DSF) is a breakthrough because it is one of only two or three medications that are known to specifically target the slow-growth phase of Lyme that regular antibiotics do not eradicate.”
“What has surprised me is how patients improve with very little of it. Prior to DSF, the conventional combinations of antibiotics would make most patients feel quite a bit better, but they would often say that their ‘brain fog’ and fatigue never quite went away. These two symptoms are often completely and rapidly resolved with DSF,” Dr. Cook said.