Archive for July, 2019

Recent Discoveries & Advancements in Research on the Lyme Disease Spirochete Borrelia Burgdorferi

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6545822/

Version 1. . 2019; 8: F1000 Faculty Rev-763.
Published online 2019 May 31. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.18379.1
PMCID: PMC6545822
PMID: 31214329

Recent discoveries and advancements in research on the Lyme disease spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi

Christa Winslow, Writing – Original Draft Preparation1 and Jenifer Coburn, Writing – Review & Editinga,1,2

Abstract

This review highlights some of the highest-profile developments and advancements in the research on Borrelia burgdorferi, the Lyme disease spirochete, that have emerged in the last two years. Particular emphasis is placed on the controversy surrounding genus nomenclature, antigenic variation at the vlsE locus, genes involved in infectivity and virulence, membrane characteristics of B. burgdorferi, and developments in experimental approaches.

__________________

**Comment**

Research hailing from Milwaukee, WI.

Oppose Wisconsin Rule Change to Mandate Meningitis Vaccines & Require Documentation of Chicken Pox Infection

image001

OPPOSE Wisconsin Rule Change to Mandate Meningitis Vaccines and Require Documentation Of Chicken Pox Infection

Submit Comments before 5:00 p.m. Friday 7/26/2019

Attend or Call in to Hearing on Friday7/26 from 8:30-9:30 a.m.

Dear Wisconsin NVIC Advocacy Team Members,

This is a critical action alert for Wisconsin families who care about vaccine choice.

The Wisconsin Department of Health Services is seeking to use the rule making process to increase vaccine mandates for students. This is different from a bill that passes through the legislature, though adopted rules have the same force as law.

If these regulations pass, 7th graders will be required to get a meningitis vaccine and parents will no longer be allowed to confirm that their children had chicken pox, requiring medical personnel to verify it.  These rules are another step toward taking away parental choice in medical decisions for their family and YOUR input is necessary to stop additional government overreach.

The most important way to stop these changes is to SUBMIT PUBLIC COMMENTS OPPOSING the proposed rule change by 5:00 pm on Friday, JULY 26.  It is critical that large numbers of opposition comments are received to stop this rule from passing.

ACTION TO TAKE:

  1. Submit public comments before 5:00 p.m. on Friday 7/26! Talking points below.

Use  web-site form: Select DHS 144 from “Rulemaking Projects” box.

OR

Written comments can be mailed (postmarked by 7/26) or e-mailed by 5:00 p.m. on 7/26:

Susan Uttech

Division of Public Health

Department of Health Services

1 W. Wilson St.

Madison, WI 53703

Email: susan.Uttech@dhs.wisconsin.gov

  1. Attend the public hearing in Madison on 7/26 – testify to oppose the changes.

            Friday, July 26th at 8:30 am-9:30 am.

Conference Room 751

1 Wilson Street

Madison WI  53703 Map 

  1. Call into the hearing to give public comment. Call (608) 316-9000 and use Conference ID: 7313694
  2. Send a copy of this email to your friends and encourage or assist them in writing and submitting public comments.
  3. Please send a copy of your comments to your own state legislators in the house and senate asking them to oppose these rules if they make it to the legislature for approval.  Your legislators can be found HERE:  Enter your address in the web-form.
  4. Continue monitoring the NVIC Advocacy Portal NVICAdvocacy.org to track the status of these rules or other legislation. From here, the Rules will later go before both the House & SenateHealth and Human Services Committees for approval or rejection.  Please save copies of your comments submitted to the department so you can send a copy of your comments to these committee members, with a request that they STOP these Rules when/if they are presented if the health department does not withdraw them.  

DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED RULES & REASONS TO OPPOSE THEM

  • Proposed changes to Immunization Requirements: HERE.
  • Analysis of the rule and the additional documents: HERE
  • The most recent version of the proposed rule text: HERE.   DHS 144
  • The fiscal estimate and economic impact analysis: HERE.
  • The public hearing notice can be found HERE.

There are several proposed rule changes.  1, 2, 4 and 5 cause the most concern, with 4 and 5 being the most concerning.

1) The Department proposes to change the “substantial outbreak” classification of chicken pox and meningitis.

2) The Department proposes to change the “substantial outbreak” classification of mumps due to mumps outbreaks in “highly-vaccinated populations.”

4) Meningitis vaccine is mandated for 7th grade students.

5) Parents are no longer able to provide confirmation of their children’s case of chicken pox/varicella, requiring a health care provider to now confirm it.

TALKING POINTS:  These are listed in order of importance.  Please use your own words to state your opposition to the proposed changes and include any personal stories that support your concerns.

OPPOSE Proposed Change 4. Meningitis vaccine requirement for 7th graders.

  • There is no urgent public health crisis to justify the expensive and potentially dangerous meningitis vaccine mandate for all Wisconsin 7th graders.
  • Meningitis is very rare in the United States, with the CDC reporting a total of only 350 cases in 2017.  The 2017 US population of approximately  325.7 million, meant that 1 in 931,000 people got meningitis and 1 in 7.2 million died.  Of the 45 deaths, ONLY 14 cases were in the age group 0-23.  These numbers do NOT indicate a public health crisis.  The mandate is unnecessary.
  • Meningococcal vaccine is currently available to any family who wants it.
  • According to the CDC, Wisconsin recorded only 6 meningococcal cases in 2016 and 4 cases in 2017. The state records are slightly different, yet, in 2015, there were only 3 cases in the 14-23 age group, with one of those being in college or technical school.
  • The vaccine only has an 80-85% efficacy rate. After two years to five years, the vaccine has been found to be, at best, only about 58 percent effective. Due to the  vaccine’s effectiveness waning, the only recommendation is that ADDITIONAL vaccines be given.
  • The package inserts for meningitis vaccines, Menactra and Menveo, indicate that   “serious adverse events” occur in 1 percent of recipients.
  • According to the CDC Pink Book, 0.3 percent of those with “serious adverse events” from meningitis vaccines will die.
  • If approximately 63,000 7th graders are given the Menactra or Menveo meningitis vaccines, Wisconsin can reasonably expect 630 serious adverse events and possibly 2 (1.89) deaths.
  • This is significant since the 2015 Wisconsin data only shows 2 cases of meningitis in high school age students with NO deaths.
  • The federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), which includes only a small fraction of the health problems that occur after vaccination in the U.S., reports 32,453 adverse events as of July 2019.  Of these, 3,955 were considered serious and there were 186 deaths, with 90 of those being in children under 17 years of age. www.medalerts.org
  • The meningitis vaccines contain neurotoxins such as formaldehyde, aluminum hydroxide, polysorbate 80, and thimerosal, a mercury derivative.
  • Meningitis vaccines list documented side effects including death, anaphylaxis/anaphylactic reaction, difficulty breathing, upper airway swelling, Guillain-Barré syndrome, dizziness, convulsion, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, irritability, abnormal crying, fever, drowsiness, fatigue, injection site pain and swelling, sudden loss of consciousness (syncope), diarrhea, headache, joint pain, brain inflammation, and facial palsy.   BexseroMenveo,Menomune, Menactra

OPPOSE Proposed Change 5. Parental reporting of chicken pox will no longer be acceptable.  Instead, a health care provider must confirm infection.

  • It is irresponsible of the Department to insist that a child with a highly contagious, yet often a generally mild disease, visit a medical facility where other children, including those who are medically fragile, will likely be present and thus at higher risk to contract it and become one of the rare adverse outcomes.
  • Not all families have existing relationships with the list of specified medical workers, and this provision could force a family to enter into a new unwanted contractual relationship with unknown medical staff.
  • Most families will also have the financial burden of all charges, or co-pays as well as laboratory fees.
  • This change would create an environment of distrust between the school staff and the parents as the parents’ word is questioned.
  • There is no provision for a titer test to be used as proof.

The Department’s claims of “little to no economic impact” in their justification for the rule change doesn’t reflect the strong negative economic impact on Wisconsin Families

  • Wisconsin families will be required to pay for doctor visits and vaccine costs to receive newly mandated vaccines.
  • The annual cost for approximately 63,000 Wisconsin 7th graders to receive meningitis vaccines will be over $10.7 million as the CDC vaccine price list for Bexsero shows the private sector cost at $170/dose.  Add in office visit expenses and there is little doubt why there is significant support for this vaccine by those who gain financially for its mandated use.
  • Requiring Wisconsin families to pay for doctor visit to have chicken pox verified will be expensive.  For generations, many families have treated chicken pox at home, as it is generally mild.  Arranging an office visit for a case of the chicken pox would add drastically to the economic impact on the families of a sick child.

OPPOSE Proposed Change 2. Change the “substantial outbreak” classification of mumps

  • The mumps component of the MMR used in the US has been the subject of a federal whistleblower fraud suit since 2010.  Two manufacturer (Merck) virologists claimed they were forced to create fraudulent efficacy results by adding rabbit antibodies so that the vaccine could remain on the CDC schedule and Merck could retain its monopoly.
  • The reason for this change is due to mumps outbreaks in “highly-vaccinated populations,” showing the vaccine’s ineffectiveness.  A few years, 1676 Arkansas school age children had mumps and 1536 (92%) had previously received at least two doses of a vaccine containing the mumps virus.  A recent mumps outbreak amongst  100% vaccinated Navy sailors on the USS Ft. McHenry, kept it in quarantine for over 5 months.
  • The Health Department should educate families on the risks of catching mumps and how to treat it due to an ineffective vaccine.

OPPOSE Proposed Change 1. Change the “substantial outbreak” to include meningitis and chicken pox. OPPOSE the inclusion of chicken pox in the “substantial outbreak” classification due to it generally being a mild infection that can be treated at home.

OPPOSE Department’s lack of notifying the public, the MAIN STAKEHOLDER, when publishing these proposed rules changes.

  • The Department claims they contacted all stakeholders which would be impacted by the proposed rule including, “Schools, school-aged children and parents, school boards, and public and private health care providers.”
  • Parents were not included as stakeholders, neither were they adequately informed.  The Department’s effort to inform the primary stakeholder, parents of school age children, was completely inadequate.  If not for the attention by watch dog groups, this rule would be implemented without parents knowing of their ability to participate in the process to oppose it.
  • Using the Rule process to change vaccine mandates removes the process from legislators who are accountable to their voting constituents.

Sincerely,

NVIC Advocacy Team
National Vaccine Information Center
http://NVIC.org and http://NVICAdvocacy.org
https://nvicadvocacy.org/members/Members/ContactUs.aspx

The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) works diligently to prepare and disseminate our legislative advocacy action alerts and supporting materials.  We request that organizations and members of the public forward our alerts in their original form to assure consistent and accurate messaging and effective action. Please acknowledge NVIC as originators of this work when forwarding to members of the public and like-minded organizations. To receive alerts immediately, register  at http://NVICAdvocacy.org, a website dedicated to this sole purpose and provided as a free public service by NVIC. 

Avoiding Direct Detection Methods For the Purpose of Concealing Chronic Lyme Disease Is A Crime

https://www.change.org/p/the-us-senate-calling-for-a-congressional-investigation-of-the-cdc-idsa-and-aldf/u/24842662?

Avoiding direct detection methods for the purpose of concealing chronic Lyme disease is a crime

JUL 19, 2019 — 

The letter below from Dr. Paul Auwaerter (Past president of the IDSA) is third in a series of correspondence over my request for proficiency testing for Nested PCR And DNA Sequencing For The Detection Of Lyme Disease And Related Borreliosis; the direct detection of the spirochete causing Lyme disease. Previous communication can be reviewed in recent Petition Updates.

The real reason the CDC stopped communication with Drs Lee and Shearer is because they published a case of chronic Lyme where a so-called Lyme disease specialist condemned a sixteen year old to a psychiatric ward because his Western blot only had 4 out of the 5 IgG bands required for positive test result. It is no secret that the US Centers for Disease Control is in bed with the IDSA.

Lyme Bumper Stickers (Public Service Announcement)
https://www.ebay.com/itm/123659578861

WAKE UP AMERICA!
Today’s letter to the Tick-borne Disease Working Group……

——— Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: tickbornedisease@hhs.gov, chris.smith@mail.house.gov
Cc:(98 Undisclosed recipients)
Date: July 19, 2019 at 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: Lyme disease often misdiagnosed, resulting in unnecessary antibiotics

To the Tick-Borne Disease Working Group,

Please see the final response from Dr. Paul Auwaerter who is not interested in proficiency testing for direct detection of Lyme disease. My reply to Dr. Auwaerter immediately follows his note below:

Response from Dr. Paul Auwaerter:

——— Original Message ———-
From: Paul Auwaerter <pauwaert@jhmi.edu>
To: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
Cc: psax@bwh.harvard.edu, jli@bwh.harvard.edu, cbusky@idsociety.org, Takaaki Kobayashi <tkobayashi@jhmi.edu>, jmstiglich@healio.com, infectiousdisease@healio.com
Date: July 18, 2019 at 9:23 PM
Subject: RE: Lyme disease often misdiagnosed, resulting in unnecessary antibiotics

Dear Mr. Tuttle,

I’d like to close our correspondence to make clear the Foundation doesn’t have funds currently to entertain your specific area of research.  You may get a sense of the funding priorities of the IDSA Foundation from our website; however, if philanthropic funds are made available with disease-specific areas, the IDSAF would entertain such research funding.

I have read your other concerns with our paper and approach, and I do hear your disagreement.

Sincerely,

Paul Auwaerter MD

Vice-Chair, IDSA Foundation

__________________________________

Carl Tuttle’s reply to Dr. Auwaerter:

———- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: Paul Auwaerter <pauwaert@jhmi.edu>
Cc: psax@bwh.harvard.edu, jli@bwh.harvard.edu, cbusky@idsociety.org, Takaaki Kobayashi <tkobayashi@jhmi.edu>, jmstiglich@healio.com, infectiousdisease@healio.com
Date: July 19, 2019 at 8:58 AM
Subject: RE: Lyme disease often misdiagnosed, resulting in unnecessary antibiotics

Dear Dr. Auwaerter,

In conclusion of our correspondence I would like to offer the following publication:

DNA sequencing diagnosis of off-season spirochetemia with low bacterial density in Borrelia burgdorferi and Borrelia miyamotoi infections.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4139787/

Faulty/misleading antibody tests landed a sixteen year old male in a psychiatric ward when his lab results did not meet the CDC’s strict criteria for positive results. His Western blot had only four of the required five IgG bands. Subsequent DNA sequencing identified a spirochetemia in this patient’s blood so his psychiatric issues were a result of neurologic Lyme disease misdiagnosed by antiquated/misleading serology. This patient was previously treated with antibiotics.

Current antibody tests for Lyme disease cannot be used to gauge treatment failure or success which makes them the ideal tool for concealing persistent infection.

I want to make this perfectly clear Dr. Auwaerter; avoiding direct detection methods for the purpose of concealing chronic Lyme disease is a crime.

Sincerely,

Carl Tuttle

Lyme Endemic Hudson, NH

__________________

**Comment**

This unfortunate story of someone being admitted to the psych ward due to not testing “positive enough” is only one of thousands…

This has been going on for over 40 years all over the world.

I’ve posted this before, but it bears repeating:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/07/09/idsa-founder-used-potent-iv-antibiotics-for-chronic-lyme/

“Setting arbitrary level of antibodies to diagnose a disease that has not been amenable to Koch’s postulates seems open to question.  By the same token, ignoring antibody results unless they meet arbitrary levels seems suspect.  The vast majority of patients in this series showed some WB antibody exposure, but many did not meet the arbitrary limits set….in our present state of knowledge, the diagnosis of chronic Lyme disease is a clinical one.  Many of the patients in this series have suffered serious ‘hurts’ when they have been told that they could not have LD because their WB did not meet arbitrary limits.”  Dr. Waisbren

Horrific antibody testing has been dooming patients for literally 4 decades. Time for change.

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/09/12/lyme-testing-problems-solutions/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/01/16/2-tier-lyme-testing-missed-85-7-of-patients-milford-hospital/

 

Kentucky: More Than Two Dozen Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever Cases Reported in Grayson County

http://outbreaknewstoday.com/kentucky-more-than-two-dozen-rocky-mountain-spotted-fever-cases-reported-in-grayson-county-89113/

Kentucky: More than two dozen Rocky Mountain spotted fever cases reported in Grayson County

July 22, 2019

By NewsDesk  @infectiousdiseasenews

Health officials in Grayson County, Kentucky are reporting a recent increase in cases of the tickborne disease, Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF).

Characteristic spotted rash of Rocky Mountain spotted fever/CDC

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

They report receiving 26 cases of RMSF since July 7, 2019.

Dr. Bryce Meredith made the following statement, “We are seeing an increase in tick-borne illnesses in Grayson and the surrounding counties. Individuals should have heightened awareness regarding ticks in our area. The most common illnesses are Ehrlichiosis and Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever.”

RMSF is a tick borne disease caused by the organism, Rickettsia rickettsii. Typically, the progress of the disease is a sudden onset of high fever, deep muscle pain, severe headache and chills. A rash usually appears on the extremities within 5 days then soon spreads to palms and soles and then rapidly to the trunk.

Fatalities can be seen in greater than 20% of untreated cases. Death is uncommon with prompt recognition and treatment. Still approximately 3-5% of cases seen in the U.S. are fatal. The absence or delayed appearance of the typical rash or the failure to recognize it, especially in dark-skinned people cause a delay in diagnosis and increased fatalities.

Early stages of RMSF can be confused with erlichiosis, meningococcal meningitis and enteroviral infection.

They are asking residents to ensure they are protecting their family, pets, and yourselves properly while outdoors.

If you find a tick, please remove it appropriately. Also, if you feel fatigued (tired) or having a headache that will not go away, consider seeing your family healthcare provider for tick borne illness testing.

Dr Meredith said, “Ticks are commonly in woods, grassy, or bushy areas. If individuals are planning on being in these areas, they should plan accordingly and wear long sleeves, long pants tucked into your socks, and use an EPA approved insect and tick repellent. Once an individual has returned inside, they should check their clothes and body for ticks. Early awareness and early tick removal is particularly important. Typically, if an individual removes a tick within 24-48 hours, this decreases the rate of disease transmission. I encourage individuals to contact their physician if a tick has been attached for an undetermined time or if they develop fever, rash, chills, or vague symptoms such as new onset unexplained dizziness or excessive fatigue.”

RMSF & the importance of timely treatment: Outbreak News Interviews
DO NOT WAIT FOR LABORATORY CONFIRMATION FOR TREATMENT IF RMSF IS SUSPECTED. This is deadly.
Do not hesitate to use doxycycline in children. New research demonstrates it will NOT hurt children’s teeth.

_________________

For more: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/09/14/rocky-mountain-spotted-fever-rmsf/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/10/21/mom-got-rocky-mountain-spotted-fever-while-picking-pumpkins/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2015/08/13/severe-case-of-rmsf-had-to-remove-patients-arms-and-legs/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/08/16/new-tick-causes-epidemic-of-rmsf/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/06/12/georgia-mom-warns-others-after-son-contracts-rocky-mountain-spotted-fever-after-tick-bite/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/08/19/monster-ticks-found-in-germany-threaten-europe-with-deadly-disease-crimean-congo-fever/  Please note the last quote of the story – that they proved a tropical form of tick typhus in one of tropical ticks found in Germany. Typhus, a bacteria, is making a comeback, particularly in the South. Common in the U.S. in the 40’s, and normally attributed to lice, now it’s been proven to be in a tick. In other words, another disease and a tick found where they supposedly shouldn’t be.
Typus is a rickettsial infection with ticks carring numerous species including rickettsia, ehrlichia, and anaplasma. Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever is also considered a tick-borne typhus fever.  

https://www.health.ny.gov/diseases/communicable/rocky_mountain_spotted_fever/fact_sheet.htm Divided into the typhus group and the spotted fever group, disease is transmitted through ectoparasites (fleas, lice, mites, and ticks). Inhalation and inoculating conjunctiva with infectious material can also cause disease. The good news for most is that doxycycline is a front-line drug for it. Broad-spectrum antibiotics aren’t helpful.

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/05/22/cdc-creates-interactive-training-for-diagnosis-management-of-rocky-mountain-spotted-fever/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/10/21/all-his-symptoms-pointed-toward-the-flu-but-the-test-was-negative-rmsf-in-connecticut/

AGAIN, TESTING IS ABYSMAL.  DOCTORS NEED EDUCATION.

If interested:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/02/19/calling-all-doctors-please-become-educated-regarding-tick-borne-illness-heres-how/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/06/06/lyme-education-for-healthcare-professionals/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/03/15/global-lyme-alliance-announces-new-partnership-with-delaware-lyme-board-to-help-educate-physicians-about-lyme-disease/

 

 

 

 

 

 

Report on Cell Tower Radiation

GK-cell-tower-rad-report-DOT-Dec2010  Report Here

Report on Cell Tower Radiation

Prepared by 

Professor Girish Kumar

IIT Bombay, Powai, Mumai, Dec. 2010

Table of Contents:

S. No.        Topic                                                  Page Number
1. Advantages and disadvantages of cell phone technology 3
2. Radiation from the cell tower 3
2.1 Radiated power density from the cell tower 4
2.2 Radiation pattern of the antenna 4
2.3 Case study of Usha Kiran Building, Mumbai 5
3. Radiation norms adopted in different countries 6
4. Theoretical and Measured Radiated power 9
4.1 Conversion from measured power to power density 10
4.2 Measurement at a cancer’s patient residence 11
4.3 Radiation Measurement at various places 11
5. Biological effects due to microwave radiation 13
5.1 Blood Brain Barrier 13
5.2 Risk to Children and Pregnant Women 14
5.3 Irreversible infertility 15
5.4 Calcium ion release from cell membranes 16
5.5 DNA damage 16
5.6 Interference with other gadgets including Pace Makers 17
5.7 Effects on Stress Proteins 17
5.8 Effect on Skin 18
5.9 Tinnitus and Ear Damage 18
5.10 Effect on Eye/ Uveal Melanoma 19
5.11Cell phone emission weaken bones 20
5.12 Salivary gland tumor 20
5.13 Melatonin Reduction 20
5.14 Sleep Disorders 21
5.15 Neurodegenerative Diseases 21
5.16 Increase in Cancer risk 21
5.17 Epidemiological studies in various countries 22
6. Adverse effect on birds, animals and environment 25
6.1 Effect on Honey Bees 25
6.2 Effect on Birds 26
6.3 Effect on mammals and amphibians 27
6.4 Effect on Plants 27
7. Possible Solutions to reduce the ill effects of cell tower radiation 28
8. Conclusions 29
Appendix A – Conversion from power received to electric field & power density 30
Appendix B – Videos on Radiation 31

References