https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/may/9/covid-19-puts-spotlight-science-scientists-often-l

COVID-19 puts spotlight on science — but scientists often lie

White House coronavirus response coordinator Dr. Deborah Birx listens as director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Dr. Anthony Fauci speaks during a meeting between President Donald Trump and Gov. John Bel Edwards, D-La., about the coronavirus response, in the Oval Office of the White House, Wednesday, April 29, 2020, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
White House coronavirus response coordinator Dr. Deborah Birx listens as director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Dr. Anthony Fauci speaks during a meeting between President Donald Trump and Gov. John Bel Edwards, D-La., about the coronavirus … more >

We can beat COVID-19 — just trust the science, we’re told. Trust in the scientists, we’re told. And that’s not a paraphrase.

“From the Editors: We Can Beat COVID-19. Just Trust Science,” Wired wrote.

Well and good. Fine and dandy. But fact is, scientists often lie. Science isn’t always the beacon toward truth. It’s not just frequently flawed; it’s frequently deceptive. And purposely so. (See link for article)

_________________

**Comment**

If ever the public needed this information – it’s now.

Best quote: 

Scientists can be wrong, very wrong. Moreover, scientists can lie. And very often, as history shows, they do.

For more on how science has been hijacked:
I could literally go on and on to infinity with this….

**UPDATE**

I am saddened to report that Tanzania President John Magufuli went missing on February 27. Mainstream media created the narrative that President Magufuli was dying from COVID-19 after labeling him a “COVID denier.” He died mysteriously on March 17.  Go here for a video on this.  This has happened many times before.

For the backstory:  Magufuli was first elected in 2015, promising to end corruption. He won re-election last October with 84% of the vote, and cut his own salary by 75%.  He implemented programs for the poor and invested funds into education and ending poverty.  But as described in this article, he was probably the biggest enemy of the global COVID-19 agenda.

His mysterious death came just five weeks after The Guardian published an opinion piece on February 8 entitled, “It’s time for Africa to rein in Tanzania’s anti-vaxxer president.” It attempts to discredit and belittle the President for speaking against the mainstream COVID-19 and vaccine narratives. The Guardian published another article last October attempting to create a fraud narrative in Tanzania’s last election. “[President Magufuli] needs to be challenged openly and directly,” the Guardian declared on February 8.

Mainstream media focused on Suhulu Hassan being the first female president of Tanzania, but several Twitter users quickly pointed out that she is an associate with the World Economic Forum.  She also conveniently goes along with the COVID and vaccine narrative.

In the following article, Magufuli literally exposed the faulty testing in a superb way – leaving no question that it’s all a ruse.  Demonstrating the joke of PCR testing, the CDC quietly withdraws EUA of the PCR test as it can’t distinguish between COVID and the flu.  But this fact was known over a year ago.  Further, it’s been discovered that graphene oxide is in the swabs, masks, and is a main component in the COVID injections. Ethylene oxide, which is used as a pesticide in agriculture and causes cancer, is also in the swabs.

https://powderedwigsociety.com/magufuli-punks-who/

President of Tanzania punks WHO, sending samples of fruit, goats, sheep, even motor oil for COVID testing. Nearly half come back positive!

BY

MAY 11, 2020

I’m skeptical that a PRC test is ever true. It’s a great scientific research tool. It’s a horrible tool for clinical medicine.30% of your infected cells have been killed before you show symptoms. By the time you show symptoms…the dead cells are generating the symptoms.” Dr. David Rasnick, bio-chemist, protease developer, and former founder of an EM lab called Viral Forensics

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/12/shedding-light-on-the-dishonorable-record-of-dr-fauci-a-real-mengele/

Excerpt:

Robert A Giraldo, MD and Etienne de Harven, MD, (produced the first electron micrograph of a retrovirus) pointed out that both the ELISA and Western Blot, and a genetic test, the PCR or ‘viral load’ test – the two major tests to determine AIDS, are not valid. “None if these tests detect the HIV virus itself, nor do they detect HIV particles.”  They go on to state that over 70 conditions including influenza, leprosy, and even pregnancy, can cause antibody tests to be positive without HIV infection.  The same is true for COVID-19. BTW: the Giraldo & de Harven 2006 article was mysteriously retracted in 2019, right before the Wuhan outbreak.

The charade is nearing its end.

https://danielcameronmd.com/lyme-podcast-a-babesia-infection-3-weeks-after-treatment-for-lyme-disease/

LYME PODCAST: A BABESIA INFECTION 3 WEEKS AFTER TREATMENT FOR LYME DISEASE.

A Babesia infection 3 weeks after treatment for Lyme disease.

I will discuss a 67-year-old woman with a Babesia infection 3 weeks after treatment for Lyme disease. Could this delay explain why some patients remain ill or relapse?

Podcast:

https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5idXp6c3Byb3V0LmNvbS83NzI

Hoversten and her colleague first discussed this case in the British Medical Journal Case Reports  in 2018.

One would expect that tick-borne infections would all occur at the same time.

One would be wrong, as this case illustrates.

A 67-year-old woman from Wisconsin had extensive exposure as an avid gardener and spent a considerable amount of time outdoors.

She did not see a tick. She did see a rash consistent with an erythema migrans rash.

A delay in onset of Babesia may explain why some Lyme disease patients relapse after initially improving with doxycycline or amoxicillin. CLICK TO TWEET

She was prescribed amoxicillin for three-weeks as she was allergic to doxycycline.

Near the end of three-week of amoxicillin, she became ill. Her fever rose to 102.9 F0. She complained of myalgias, dizziness, and fatigue.

Her blood test showed mild anemia, a low platelet count and neutrophil count, and a very high C-reactive protein.

  • neutrophil is a type of white blood cell that helps resolve infections and heal damaged tissues. A low neutrophil count can be seen in tick-borne diseases.
  • A high C-reactive protein is a marker for inflammation but cannot be used to determine what type of inflammation.

She was admitted to the hospital. The doctors thought she might be suffering from sepsis or a tick-borne infection.

  • Sepsis is a life-threatening illness caused by your body’s response to an infection.
  • Her red blood count and platelets continued to drop.
  • She was transferred to a second hospital.
  • There was no evidence of sepsis. The blood cultures were negative after five days.

BABESIA INFECTION

She was diagnosed with the parasite Babesia microti by PCR and by a thin smear of her red blood cells. Typically, Babesia microti is seen on a thick smear of blood. In her case, 0.4% of her red blood cells showed the parasite Babesia microti on a thin smear.

Babesia infections can be severe and, in rare cases, life-threatening. Babesia infections can also be mild or without symptoms. Babesia was more likely to be severe in this woman as she was over 50-years of age and had a history of colon cancer.

She was prescribed a 10-day course of azithromycin and atovaquone. By 5th day of treatment, her fever had resolved, and her platelet count had more than doubled from a low of 17,000 per dl to 42, 000 per dl.

The authors report that the woman remains fatigued after completing treatment.

The authors discussed the nearly three-week gap in time between the woman’s erythema migrans rash and her diagnosis of Babesia. This is not the first case where the onset of Babesia was delayed.

The authors cited two papers describing a 3 to 4-week delay in the onset of Babesia. I described a paper in an earlier podcast where two babies contracted Babesia from their mothers. They did not present with Babesia until after being discharged from the hospital. You can read more about these babies in the article by Saetre and colleagues or listen to my Inside Lyme podcast titled. “Two children who contacted Babesia from their mother.”

This delay may explain why some Lyme disease patients relapse after initially improving with doxycycline or amoxicillin. Treatment for Lyme disease with doxycycline or amoxicillin is not effective for the treatment of Babesia.

What can we learn from this cases?

  1. Babesia infections can occur weeks after the onset of Lyme disease.

What questions does these cases raise?

  1. Should the woman have been evaluated for Babesia infection at the time of the erythema migrans?
  2. Would a Babesia infection have been recognized if the woman had not been diagnosed with Lyme disease?
  3. Should Lyme disease patients be advised to return for follow-up?
  4. Would earlier treatment have avoided the need for hospitalization?
  5. What is the long-term outcome for this woman with a Babesia infection

TREATING TICK-BORNE DISEASE IN MY PRACTICE

In my practice, each individual requires a careful assessment. That is why I order a broad range of blood tests for other illnesses in addition to tick-borne infections. I also arrange consultations with specialists as needed.

Many patients are complex, as highlighted in this Inside Lyme Podcast series.

We need more doctors with skills recognizing Babesia in a patient with Lyme disease. We hope that professionals evaluating individuals with Lyme disease can use this case to remind them to look for Babesia with Lyme disease.

Inside Lyme Podcast Series

This Inside Lyme case series will be discussed on my Facebook and made available on podcast and YouTube.  As always, it is your likes, comments, and shares that help spread the word about this series and our work. If you can, please leave a review on iTunes or wherever else you get your podcasts.

Sign up for our newsletter to keep up with our cases.

_____________________

For more:  

Watch the exclusively translated RAIR Foundation USA video of Vittorio Sgarbi’s speech:  https://rairfoundation.com/italian-leader-slams-false-coronavirus-numbers-25000-did-not-die-its-a-way-to-impose-a-dictatorship-watch/  Video Here

Approx. 5 Min.

Italian Leader Slams ‘False Coronavirus Numbers: 25,000 Did Not Die, It’s a Way To Impose a Dictatorship’

On Friday, April 24, 2020, Vittorio Sgarbi, a member of the Italian Chamber of Deputies, denounced what he claims are false coronavirus death statistics. Sgarbi feels that fake statistics are being propagated by the government and the media to terrorize the citizens of Italy and establish a dictatorship.

The member of the Forza Italia party slammed the closure of 60% of Italian businesses for 25,000 Chinese-Coronavirus deaths from the floor of the legislature.

“It’s not true,” he said. “Don’t use the deaths for rhetoric and terrorism.” According to the National Institute of Health, 96.3% did not die of coronavirus, but of other pathologies stated Sgarbi – which means that only 925 have died from the virus and 24,075 have died of other things claimed Sgarbi, “….the virus was little more than an influenza. Don’t lie! Tell the truth!”

Sgarbi’s controversial speech was delivered during ‘Cura Italia’ decree law discussions. The proposal intends to develop measures to strengthen the national health service based on what he claims is false data. Sgarbi challenged his colleagues to investigate the real numbers themselves and be united in the reporting the truth:

“Let us be united in liberation against hypocrisy and lies, against falsifications, against the false numbers that are given to terrorize Italians. The 25,000 dead, as Professor Bassetti said, died of heart attacks, cancer and other…Let’s not use them to humiliate Italy. Let’s not use them to give citizens false news. Give the numbers, check them out, and I challenge you before a jury of honor, Trizzino, to look at the numbers…”

 

 

 

 

https://www.change.org/p/the-us-senate-calling-for-a-congressional-investigation-of-the-cdc-idsa-and-aldf

VALNEVA AND PFIZER ANNOUNCE COLLABORATION TO CO-DEVELOP AND COMMERCIALIZE LYME DISEASE VACCINE

MAY 11, 2020 — 

As a follow-up to the previous petition update regarding “Direct Detection Tests for Lyme Disease”

Who’s got Lyme and who doesn’t ????

——— Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: tickbornedisease@hhs.gov
Cc: (98 Undisclosed recipients)
Date: May 7, 2020 at 8:27 AM
Subject: VALNEVA AND PFIZER ANNOUNCE COLLABORATION TO CO-DEVELOP AND COMMERCIALIZE LYME DISEASE VACCINE, VLA15

To the Tick-Borne Disease Working Group,

Please see the letter below sent to Valneva and Pfizer with copy to the principal investigator of VLA15.

Carl Tuttle

———- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: communications@valneva.com, Steven.Danehy@pfizer.com
Cc: par.comstedt@valneva.com, urban.lundberg@valneva.com, tickbornedisease@hhs.gov, sasheller@sheller.com
Date: May 7, 2020 at 8:19 AM
Subject: VALNEVA AND PFIZER ANNOUNCE COLLABORATION TO CO-DEVELOP AND COMMERCIALIZE LYME DISEASE VACCINE, VLA15

VALNEVA AND PFIZER ANNOUNCE COLLABORATION TO CO-DEVELOP AND COMMERCIALIZE LYME DISEASE VACCINE, VLA15 

April 30, 2020

Phase 2 vaccine candidate, VLA15, is being evaluated for adult and pediatric indications in North America and Europe. 

https://investors.pfizer.com/investor-news/press-release-details/2020/Valneva-and-Pfizer-Announce-Collaboration-to-Co-Develop-and-Commercialize-Lyme-Disease-Vaccine-VLA15/default.aspx
To: VALNEVA AND PFIZER,

Have your clinical studies identified adverse reactions when VLA15 is administered to an individual with active Lyme disease? All Tuttle family members advanced to late stage Lyme disease before we knew what had gone wrong with our health and none of us met the CDC’s strict criteria for positive test results. The only FDA approved two-tier serology test is useless for 4-6 weeks after a tick bite because it takes that long for humans to develop antibodies against the spirochete responsible for Lyme disease.

So how do you plan to rule out active infection (before injection) if we don’t have an accurate and early direct detection test for Lyme disease? Our family’s experience is not unique as most Lyme patients who have become disabled by the infection went months, years or decades before diagnosis.

Until this scenario is recognized and fully addressed don’t expect overwhelming reception for a vaccine previously withdrawn with a record of a class action settlement for adverse reactions. 

Respectfully Submitted,

Carl Tuttle
Lyme Endemic Hudson, NH

Cc: 
Tick-Borne Disease Working Group
Sheller, P.C law firm Class Actions and Mass Torts

___________________________