March 25, 2026

In the mid-1970s, a cluster of unexplained illnesses appeared in a small town in Connecticut. It would later be called Lyme disease. But how was the investigation handled? What questions were closed? And what records still remain unseen? This 32-minute investigative documentary examines the early history of Lyme disease, the institutional response, and the broader issue of transparency in public health decision-making.

This is not about assigning blame. This is not about promoting a predetermined theory.

It is about one principle: If federal records exist regarding Lyme’s early history, the public deserves to see them. The MAHA movement has emphasized a simple idea: transparency strengthens trust. That applies here. If you believe transparency matters — watch the full investigation, share it, and use #ReleaseTheLymeFiles

Conspiracies don’t begin with imagination. They begin when transparency ends.

CHAPTERS ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

0:00 The weapon that crawled, bit, and disappeared

1:23 Old Lyme, Connecticut — where it started

2:43 One mother’s notes changed everything

4:54 Plum Island — the government lab 8 miles away

7:03 The US military used insects as disease carriers — it’s documented

9:22 The timeline that’s hard to ignore

10:13 Why Borrelia doesn’t behave like a normal infection

13:53 Records sealed, witnesses go silent

17:06 Boxes lost at sea, dead birds, and Lab 257

20:01 What if we’re wrong — challenging the theory

23:29 Patients today — still dismissed, still without answers

25:34 The 2025 federal Lyme roundtable

27:21 Operation Paperclip and Erich Traub

29:07 What we know, what we don’t, and what was never told

For more:

https://www.change.org/p/the-us-senate-calling-for-a-congressional-investigation-of-the-cdc-idsa-and-aldf/u/34624473

NEW LYME VACCINE: How much vaccine BS (safe and effective) can we tolerate??

Carl Tuttle Hudson, NH, United States

May 17, 2026

—– Forwarded Message —–
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: thart15@jh.edu <thart15@jh.edu>
Cc: kremington@ktvn.com <kremington@ktvn.com>; producers@ktvn.com <producers@ktvn.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2026 at 09:16:59 AM EDT
Subject: Health Watch: Lyme disease vaccine

KTVN 2 News Nevada

Kristen Remington Anchor/Reporter

Health Watch: Lyme disease vaccine

Quote:

“There used to be a Lyme disease vaccine called LYMErix in the late 90’s and early 2000’s. This was eventually pulled off the market due to low sales.” -Thomas M. Hart, PhD

Thomas M. Hart, PhD

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

615 N. Wolfe Street, E5638

Baltimore Maryland 21205

Dr. Hart,

“Low sales” of the LYMErix vaccine is not the entire truth and has been regurgitated across mainstream media. 

The vaccine known as LYMErix was supposed to expose the immune system to the outer surface protein A (OspA) of the spirochete responsible for causing Lyme disease but for some patients, it caused the same crippling effects of the disease itself as reported in the class action lawsuit:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/sodqs3pdeeesktf/Sheller%20Lymerix.pdf?dl=0

Excerpt from the lawsuit:

“The people who have contacted us were, prior to vaccination with LYMErix, healthy, active and energetic. Indeed, the very reason they sought the LYMErix vaccine was their desire to preserve their healthy, active lifestyle. However, what they experienced was a dramatic degradation of their health and quality of life. As will be described below, these previously healthy individuals are now afflicted with painful, at times debilitating arthritic symptoms, including joint pain and swelling, as well as extremely severe Lyme-disease-like symptoms which have persisted to this day.”

Below is the link to the Final Judgement and Approval of the class action against SmithKline Beecham as a settlement was awarded to these individuals.

JUDGEMENT, FINAL ORDER AND DECREE GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF THE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/811ar7u22g1x7vrgiwjhx/2003_Vaccine_Judgement_Final_Sttle_Apprvl..pdf?rlkey=ot1sl13exzgm2bv7ldfe7ks53&dl=0

A chronic relapsing seronegative disease does not fit the vaccine model so chronic Lyme which is completely devastating to the patient is not recognized and there is no treatment. The disabled Lyme patient is left to fend for himself because treating this class of patient became too expensive as outlined in the racketeering lawsuit. There is a growing community of horribly disabled patients whose disability has gone unrecognized for three decades.

Here’s yet another victim:

Nicole Malachowski: Unfit for Duty from Debilitating Tick-Borne Disease

http://cdmrp.army.mil/cwg/stories/2018/nicole_malachowski_profile

“Her medical retirement, however, was premature. At only 43 years old, she was deemed unfit for duty due to neurological damage from tick-borne illness.”

The latest vaccine from French drug manufacturer Valneva is another OspA vaccine similar to LYMErix so the possibility exists that the class of patient who experienced the debilitating effects of LYMErix could end up with the same results. There was no attempt to uncover why LYMErix disabled the patient as described in the class action. Until we fully understand how Lyme disease disables its victim aren’t we playing Russian roulette with people’s health?

Respectfully Submitted,

Carl Tuttle

Independent Researcher

Hudson, NH

Suppressing evidence of persistent infection after antibiotic treatment for Lyme disease is not collaboration, it is collusion:

Peer Reviewed Evidence of Persistence of Lyme Disease Spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi and Tick-Borne Diseases (700 references)

https://www.dropbox.com/s/n09sk90eo6xz7ua/700%20articles%20LYME%20EvidenceofPersistence-V2.pdf?dl=0

For more:

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/breaking-federal-court-strikes-down-landmark-fluoride-ruling-on-technicality-not-science/

Breaking: Federal Court Strikes Down Landmark Fluoride Ruling on Technicality — ‘Not the Science’

Citing a procedural question, a federal appeals court has vacated a landmark decision that found fluoridated drinking water poses an “unreasonable risk” to children’s health. The court sent the case back to the district judge and ordered him to ignore any scientific evidence uncovered after 2020. Attorney Michael Connett told The Defender the court instructed the judge “to travel back in time to 2020 and make this ruling based on a stale factual record.”

by Brenda Baletti, Ph.D.

May 22, 2026

gavel and young boy drinking water

A federal appeals court has vacated a landmark decision that found fluoridated drinking water poses an “unreasonable risk” to children’s health under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).

The decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals did not challenge the substance of the lower court’s findings — that fluoride is toxic to children and ought to be regulated. Instead, the court based its decision on procedural issues related to the lower court’s handling of the litigation.

The case will now go back to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, where District Judge Edward Chen will be required to exclude all scientific evidence that became available after 2020.

Michael Connett, attorney for the plaintiffs, told The Defender the court “instructed Judge Chen to travel back in time to 2020 and make this ruling based on a stale factual record.”

Connett said the directive to ignore years’ worth of evidence on fluoride’s dangers runs counter to the intent of the TSCA — which is to protect hundreds of millions of Americans from substances that are harmful to human health.

The federal appeals court ruling, handed down late Thursday, stemmed from a lawsuit against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) brought by consumer advocacy groups including Food & Water Watch, the Fluoride Action Network (FAN), and Moms Against Fluoridation.

The groups sued after the EPA refused to consider their 2016 citizens’ petition asking the agency to regulate fluoride.

After two bench trials, Chen ruled that fluoride at the federally recommended concentration of 0.7 milligrams/liter (mg/L) posed an “unreasonable risk” to children’s health and ordered the EPA to regulate it accordingly.

However, the 9th Circuit panel said the lower court violated the “party presentation principle” — a legal doctrine requiring courts to act as neutral arbiters rather than taking control of a case’s factual development.

The ruling is a procedural victory for the EPA. However, since the trial drew national attention to the extensive evidence of fluoride’s neurotoxic effects, communities and states across the country have stopped adding fluoride to their water.

Even the EPA itself — under a different law — has launched a new investigation into the safety of water fluoridation. (See link for article)

For more:

https://imahealth.substack.com/p/alpha-gal-syndrome-when-a-tick-bite? (Go here for article and video)

Alpha-Gal Syndrome: When a Tick Bite Leads to a Red Meat Allergy

Dr. Ryan Cole joins The National News Desk to explain alpha-gal syndrome, the tick-borne condition that can trigger a sudden allergy to red meat.

Independent Medical Alliance

May 21, 2026

IMA Head of Medical and Scientific Affairs Dr. Ryan Cole joined The National News Desk to break down alpha-gal syndrome, a tick-borne condition that can trigger a sudden allergy to red meat. Dr. Cole explains how the lone star tick transfers a sugar molecule called alpha-1,3-galactose into the bloodstream, which can cause the body to develop an immune reaction to beef, pork, lamb, and other mammalian meats.

The conversation covers why symptoms often appear hours after eating, how repeated tick bites can intensify the reaction, and why the condition is becoming more common as the lone star tick expands its range across the United States. Dr. Cole notes that up to two-thirds of patients see improvement over time, and walks through practical prevention steps for anyone spending time outdoors this season.

Check out these related resources from IMA below, followed by the full segment transcript.

My comment after the article on AGS and the fact the tick is not the sole perp:

Researchers admit they don’t understand the mechanism of action and ticks are not the sole perp, but the perfect scapegoat. A 2009 Australian paper concludes out of 25 patients, only one reported a tick bite 6 months after the onset of meat allergy. One in 5 in the U.S. reported no tick bite at all. In Switzerland, only 1 out of four had a history of tick bite and the authors speculated that there may be other ways of sensitization.

While the Australian researchers inferred that the perp is 1 species of tick, they couldn’t prove it as no lab method exists to check! In the U.S. and Europe, researchers confidently blame different ticks as the sole perps despite meat allergies occurring ‘well outside’ the areas populated by these ticks. Researchers have never been able to confirm that something in tick saliva is responsible for AG antibodies.

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2025/09/03/ags-ticks-a-false-trail/ (Gelatin-containing vaccines and bovine serum albumin (BSA) used in cell cultures that produce vaccines are implicated due to causing hypersensitivity reactions, especially after repeated shots)

Lastly, independent tick research has proven the climate has ZERO to do with tick and disease proliferation:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/11/07/ticks-on-the-move-due-to-migrating-birds-and-photoperiod-not-climate-change/ There’s huge government money for researchers studying ‘climate change.’

It is far more likely that the spread of ticks and their diseases is due to our very own government doing research stuffing them with multiple pathogens and then releasing them into the environment:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2026/03/06/declassified-docs-link-bioweapon-program-to-lyme-disease/

For far too long we’ve been told ticks don’t exist in certain areas, therefore you can’t be infected, so you won’t be treated.  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/05/31/no-lyme-in-the-south-guess-again/

Tell that to the mouse, squirrel, bird, fox, reptile, deer, and virtually every other animal, including humans that they can’t cross state borders!

Parasite, Biowarfare & Cancer

Go here to listen to Dr. Lee Merritt discuss the history of parasites, biowarfare and cancer.

According to Merritt, the story of the CIA covering up the cure for cancer is pure bunk. The CIA didn’t exist when the truth about cancer was covered up. Merritt shows  the proof–what we knew about cancer before 1930, and how Cancer research has been used–not just by us–as a cover for bioweapons research. And she believes it is actively being used as a bioweapon against us today.

The silver lining of COVID tyranny is that it affected nearly everyone in some form or fashion. Suffering has a way of opening eyes to the fact our government is not our friend, does not care about our well-being, and is in bed with Big Pharma – actually peddling their products for financial gain.  Once you know this, things start making a lot more sense.  Further, research institutions are beholden to this very corrupt, conflict riddled government for research grants which means they can’t be trusted either.  The same goes for the academic publishing cartel. And lastly, the media is essentially a prostitute who will do anything for money, including accepting money from drug makers.

So, there you have it.  The current lovely state of things.

With all of this said, it would be prudent to question everything our government, research, and media tells us because if they lie in one area, rest assured – they aren’t above lying in another area.  

Our government health ‘experts’ attack anything that they don’t have their fingers on.  There’s been a long, sordid history of the FDA attacking natural supplements, hormones, and anything Big Pharma considers a threat. Rather than addressing real issues like the excess levels of electromagnetic radiation, or ending the decades long addition of fluoride to water after research proves it lowers intelligence, our tax dollars are at work attacking safe treatments like homeopathy, supplements like NAC, natural thyroid hormones, and ivermectin – a proven, safe drug on the WHO list of essential medicines.

Which brings us to cancer – the massively lucrative elephant in the room.

Recently, a published cancer study linking the COVID shot to cancer simply disappeared.  That’s right.  Poof!  Another cancer journal was hit with cyberattacks after confirming over 300 peer-reviewed COVID shot cancer cases across 27 countries.  The evidence continues to pile up but no admissions are forth-coming, so don’t hold your breath.

But, there is some good news in this muddy pig-pen.  Red-pilled, frustrated doctors are finding many alternative cancer treatments that appear to be working and have a much higher safety profile than current new treatments, which according to a new review only help fewer than 2% of patients.

A few of these successful cancer treatments are anti-parasitic medications.

It’s important to learn about the history and Merritt is highly qualified to give that lesson.  Go to top link to hear it.