Go here to see the eerie and creepy Dawn of Augmented Humanity which exposes Neuralink’s CIA and military roots to it’s developers, whose shocking admissions should cause us all to pause. It all comes back to Harvard scientist, Dr. Lieber’s work, who was found guilty of hiding financial ties to China from federal agencies.  

https://www.pcrm.org/news/news-releases/statement-physicians-committee-neuralinks-purported-patient-implant

Statement from the Physicians Committee on Neuralink’s Purported Patient Implant

surgery simulation
Photo: Getty Images

On January 29, 2024, Elon Musk claimed on his social media platform X that a patient had received an implant from Musk’s brain-computer interface company Neuralink “and is recovering well.” The statement has not been independently verified. It is important to remember that Musk has a long track record of misleading the public about Neuralink’s supposed developments. In addition, Neuralink has a well-documented history of conducting unnecessary, sloppy experiments in monkeys, pigs, sheep, and other animals that raise serious concerns about the safety of its device. Past experiments revealed serious safety concerns stemming from the device’s invasiveness and rushed actions by company employees. In addition, a significant number of medical devices approved for clinical trials fail to ever make it to the market. As such, the public should continue to be skeptical of the safety and functionality of any device produced by Neuralink.

According to a March 2023 news report, which cited Neuralink employees, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) itself “raised safety concerns” related to “device’s lithium battery; the potential for the implant’s tiny wires to migrate to other areas of the brain; and questions over whether and how the device can be removed without damaging brain tissue.”

In addition, Musk’s true intentions for Neuralink are disturbingly clear. He has repeatedly said the goal of the company is “to achieve a symbiosis with artificial intelligence,” which is not necessarily in line with developing treatments for patients.

The Physicians Committee continues to urge Elon Musk and Neuralink to shift to developing a noninvasive brain-computer interface. Researchers elsewhere have already made progress to improve patient health using such noninvasive methods, which do not come with the risk of surgical complications, infections, or additional operations to repair malfunctioning implants. Noninvasive devices are already demonstrating the ability to improve quality of life for older adults and elderly patients, translate brain activity into intelligible speech, and assist paralyzed patients(See link for article)

_____________

**Comment**

The article has a timeline of the controversy surrounding the more than 1,500 monkeys Neuralink had killed in experiments involving the brain-computer interface, and yet in May 2023, the FDA approved Neuralink’s request for permission to pursue human trials!

Buyer Beware!

For more:

http://

Biofilm Busters for Gut Infections

Confluence Nutrition

Biofilm Busters for Gut Infections: DO YOU NEED THEM?

Treatment resistant gut infections are sometimes due to microbial biofilms. In this video, I discuss what is biofilm, what is a biofilm buster, what to use for gut biofilm breakdown, and how to get rid of biofilm. This is valuable for those with SIBO, IBS, any kind of dysbioisis or other gut infection.

For more:

https://www.lymedisease.org/ultraparenting-book/

Mom of 4 kids with Lyme offers encouragement to other parents

By Anna Brennan

I had already given birth four times before I found out that I had chronic Lyme. Looking back, I think my children’s diagnoses were inevitable.

Just like the other children in our neighborhood, my kids sat in piles of leaves in the fall. They played in tall grass in the spring. We lived in a quiet cul-de-sac by the woods and, naively, my husband and I were flattered when rabbits and deer chose our yard to graze in.

At very young ages, my children struggled with a range of symptoms from food allergies to OCD to recurring fevers and more. They also developed behavioral issues that made them extra difficult to parent. Their idiosyncratic symptoms got worse as they grew, which led me to seek the help of a physician who specialized in autism spectrum disorders. Fortunately, he happened to be a Lyme literate doctor, too. “Let’s test for Lyme,” he said. What’s that? I thought to myself as he handed me a pamphlet on ticks.

The daunting, winding road

I soon found out how daunting and winding the road to recovery from tick-borne illnesses can be.

Veteran parents and well-meaning friends told me not to worry about my kids. They said, “They’ll be just fine” if I “let them grow out of it.” The guidance I actually needed didn’t come from them or from traditional parenting books. And I hadn’t yet met other families who had Lyme.

On the contrary, motivational speakers and high achievers I didn’t know personally became my role models. I read their books, listened to their interviews, and incorporated their wisdom in my parenting in order to be in constant contact with hope. Their push to Set big goals! and Never give up! had relevancy in my home.

Using these people’s advice, I was tough on myself. I even assigned myself ratings as I parented. If I was impatient when my toddler had an hour-long meltdown, I would dock my grade. When I handled my five-year-old’s aggressive behavior calmly, I would mentally reward myself with a high mark. Reaching for high personal standards helped me get through the grueling days and nights as I cared for my sick kids.

We’ve all heard of the airplane analogy where passengers are advised to put on their own oxygen mask before helping their child. However, I learned that I had to take care of myself simultaneously as I was helping my kids.

What this looked like for me was ditching junk food that I had been using to dull my emotional stress. I traded soda for water and ate nourishing foods so that I could be alert when I had to wake up during the night.

Having time to exercise was a challenge but I found out the hard way that if I didn’t consider my own health along with my children’s, I would not be able to keep up with their schedule. I would put a set number of rubber bands on my wrist in the morning, each one representing a mobility drill or strength exercise that I had to sneak into my day. By the evening, I intended to have no more reminders left on my arm.

The “invisible attorney”

I reached my goals by thinking creatively. Just as an elite athlete uses analogies to better performance, I did, too, as I parented. I would pretend that an invisible attorney was standing beside my children, ready to catch me on details I did wrong.

One time, for example, when my daughter had a stomachache, she quietly walked upstairs and ripped an entire jumbo package of paper towels off their rolls. When I found her in the white, wispy mess, I wanted to shout at her, “What do you think you’re doing?! Clean it up, now!” However, I imagined the attorney watching me and taking notes. I had to think carefully before addressing her without losing my temper.

One technique I also relied on was when I passed by the bathroom mirror on my way to the hallway, and I would stop for a moment to look at myself. “You can do this,” the reflection would say aloud to me. Or, “You didn’t handle that well. Try to do better.”

Just seeing my face was comforting because I knew the person in the mirror had my best interest in mind. “I see you…It’s OK…You are strong…Keep going,” I would remind myself, often offering a nod and a thumbs-up for added assurance. This tactic, along with many others, helped me treat my children respectfully when they were most difficult to care for.

I viewed myself as a leader in my household. I managed everything related to my kids’ health protocols, from special diets and therapies to homeschool and the general morale of my family. Despite how hard I worked, I still got blamed by other adults when my kids were unwell. In fact, I was bombarded with negativity from those around me who knew nothing about Lyme disease. No one outside of my home and our doctor’s office acknowledged their medical symptoms.

Proving to outsiders shouldn’t be your goal

After years of experience, I now can say that trying to prove to others that I was doing my best is irrelevant. My advice to caregivers who are new to the battles of Lyme would be this: remember that your reputation is not what you’re fighting for. Convincing others takes emotional effort and time that would be better spent on helping your loved ones.

Additionally, I would say that everyone learns on his/her own timeline. We all know some impressive leaders in the Lyme community who were once nonbelievers. You, and everyone else that those people have come across in life, contributed to their transformation.

My children have made significant progress over the years. They aren’t recognizable as the once medically fragile people they used to be. Because of their years of struggling, they don’t take their health for granted.

I believe that I was gifted the children I had. As a family, we discovered through trial and error how to be grateful, educated, and resilient. My role now is to help other families in the Lyme community.

Anna Brennan has written a book to help other parents who have children with health issues. “Ultraparent Thinking” can be found at ultraparentthinking.com.

______________

A true heroine in my book.

For more:

https://drrimatruthreports.substack.com/p/virusno-virus-im-an-md-and-i-dont

“Virus/No Virus” I’m an MD and I Don’t Care. Neither Should You.

Why are we fighting over a theory, instead of the real issue? Our side is ripping each other’s eyes out over properly aligned right think, or lack thereof. Whose battle are we fighting?

Article excerpts, some of which is slightly abridged:

I recognize that biowarfare has been, and is being, conducted on citizens all over the world without the least compunction by the governments empowered to protect them and that informed consent is, as my wonderful late husband, Maj. Gen. Albert N. Stubblebine III (US Army) said not long before he was murdered for his health freedom advocacy, the defining issue of the 21st century.

I recognize that through brilliantly planned and executed, abundantly funded (think Predatory Philanthropy since John D. Rockefeller and friends, Gates, Soros, Koch, etc.), medicine, governance, education, social structures, conflict and war, justice, science, agriculture, economics, journalism, reproduction and just about every other function of humans has been reshaped to ready us for a transition to population destruction and enslavement of the remnant from our DNA outward.

I care about one thing and one thing only, and I submit to you that you should be focused on that thing as your primary focus if you want to have a snowball’s chance of surviving the well-stocked fires of Hell right along with me. And that one thing is simple: Get the country that you live in out of the death machine, the whited sepulcher that is the UN and all its component working parts (and there are a lot of them). Here: https://PreventGenocide2030.org.

  • What difference does it make whether or not viruses are real when your children are being destroyed?
  • What difference does it make whether or not viruses are real when your food is being destroyed?
  • What difference does it make whether or not viruses are real when your right to think, to speak, to ponder, to wonder, to engage in thought and challenge that brings us forward through that process is under global attack, slated for Orwellian annihilation?
  • What difference does it make whether or not viruses are real when your form of governance, as flawed as it was, is about to be eviscerated? (See link for article)
We are not going to give the patient a manicure while he is dying under our hands.

_______________

**Comment**

This is helpful.

The past 4 years have made it incredibly hard to see the forest through the trees and this article helps with perspective.

Does it ultimately matter whether or not viruses exist?  Yes, of course, because truth matters.  But, right now it’s about picking your battles.

Dr. Laibow states:

The Claude Bernard/Béchamp Terrain Theory may, in fact, be a better model than the Pasteur Germ Theory. So, yes, when I have my doctor’s coat on and am thinking about an individual’s health, I will care about all of that.

Now? I do not give the slightest bit of a care.

If they exist and we do not get out of the death machine, it does not make any difference. If they do not exist and we do not get out of the death machine, it does not make any difference.

Food for Thought

A patient sent me similar information related to this about Lyme disease that I’ve sat on for quite a while, but is worth posting now as it relates:  https://drsambailey.com/resources/videos/germ-theory/the-lyme-disease-lie/  Dr. Sam Bailey goes through the scientific papers that it is all built upon.  The video is only 19 minutes but definitely worth your time for consideration. Admittedly, this is difficult viewing as it is something we have all lived or are living through; however, it certainly shows where research needs to be focused: bacterial isolation, transmission, effective testing, and treatments. These issues are not new, but it is alarming that so little has moved forward in 40 years. I will state this: extended and varied antimicrobials and other supportive treatments got both my husband and I well Without them, I don’t even want to ponder where we’d be. How they worked is perhaps just as unimportant as the virus/no virus argument since we are talking about survival and quality of life.  It is pretty tough; however, to fake or imagine severe herxheimer reactions for years at a time that coincides with treatment. 

I highly recommend this article on the whole virus debate.

For more on this topic:

For more on the U.N.:

Please watch this 15 minute video on how the CDC and its subsidiaries, without ANY accurate DATA, fed the public fear porn 24/7 by using exaggerated death rates in unvaxxed populations.  The CDC only counted a person as “vaccinated,” two weeks after their SECOND dose. Everyone outside that narrow window is considered unvaccinated. It also used a computer system that didn’t even have a category for “unvaccinated.”  A doctor had 4 choices to input into the system: fully ‘vaccinated,’ partially ‘vaccinated,’ postponed, or unknown. The status is ‘unknown’ if there is no record of the COVID shot.

The blundering CDC is back to its old tricks of hiding and manipulating data for its own purpose.

When they did a manual query of all 4,114 patients with ‘unknown’ vaccination status, 44% were previously ‘vaccinated.’

The media, public health ‘authorities’ and many others emphatically stated things based on fairy dust.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/evidence-how-cdc-buried-vaccine-death-data-  Video Here  (Approx. 14 Min)

Evidence: How CDC Buried Vaccine Death Data

Frontline Health
Jan-27-2024
Today on Frontline Health we interview John Beaudoin, an electrical engineer and author of “The Real CdC.”
On January 18, 2022, Cassidy, a seven-year-old girl died from COVID-19 complications in Massachusetts. Her story was broadcast on local networks. Beaudoin saw it too, but he had questions.
“I’m thinking, for everything I know about the data, there’s no way a seven-year-old girl died from COVID,” he said.

Beaudoin ran eight public records requests.
“I ran them through other people so that the state wouldn’t deny me,” he said.
That’s how he was able to obtain the entire death certificate database of Massachusetts with no redactions, from the year 2015 through 2022. At the time, he says it was a total of 420,000 records. Cassidy’s cause of death was in there too. Her death certificate vaguely listed “complications of coronavirus-19 viral infection.”
“Okay, well, what kind of complications? Why didn’t they list anything like pneumonia [or] ARDS?” he said.
“Why is there nothing else listed? Did she have a heart attack? How does somebody die from COVID with no other symptoms?”
Beaudoin decided to turn to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). After running a few requests, he came upon one record that could have belonged to Cassidy.
“The report was made on January 15th, that’s a couple days, two or three days before she died.”
This particular VAERS record describes a 7-year-old girl vomiting for 8-10 hours after her first COVID-19 vaccine injection. After her second injection, she had severe abdominal pain, 103 degree fever and no bowel movement for three days.
If this VAERS record actually belongs to Cassidy, then her cause of death should have been listed as a vaccine.
“I want to know, is that the same girl? The state won’t tell me so I’m suing the governor of the state, the public health commissioner, chief medical examiner and four individual medical examiners.”
But Cassidy’s case “was the tip of the iceberg,” says Beaudoin. He has uncovered many more questionable death certificates in the Massachusetts death database that have not attributed “vaccine” as the cause of death when there was evidence of severe vaccine reaction.
“It’s not willful ignorance,” Beaudoin said.
“This is intentional withholding of information from the public that would save the lives of the public.”

_______________

**Comment**

This is not the first time an ordinary citizen figured out “the math doesn’t work,” and did their own investigating.  As they say, “The Truth Will Out!”

For more:

The CDC quietly withholds, deletes, and manipulates data. This organization can not be trusted and needs to be disbanded: