Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

U.S. Military Uses AI to Accelerate Viral Outbreak Modeling & Funds Intranasal Spray Self-Replicating sa-mRNA H5N1 Bird Flu Vax

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/darpa-uses-ai-to-push-viral-pandemic?p

DARPA Uses AI to Push Viral Pandemic Outbreak Modeling From Weeks to Days

Speed is being prioritized over scrutiny, with AI-generated models designed to justify interventions before they can be meaningfully challenged.

Jon Fleetwood
Jan 09, 2026

The U.S. military is funding artificial intelligence (AI) systems designed to drastically accelerate viral outbreak modeling—compressing a process that typically takes weeks into something that can be produced in days, then used to steer real-world interventions.

In other words, the faster the model, the less time there is to question whether the response is justified at all.

This acceleration follows DARPA’s already-documented pre-COVID pandemic infrastructure  designed to turn digital genetic sequences into synthesized viruses and mass-produced mRNA countermeasures on a fixed timeline. (See link for article)

_______________

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/us-military-funds-intranasal-spray?

U.S. Military Funds Intranasal Spray Self-Replicating sa-mRNA H5N1 Bird Flu Vaccine Built From Chimeric Viral Constructs: Journal ‘Nature Communications’

U.S. government is not slowing its push toward intranasal self-replicating RNA vaccine technology.

Jon Fleetwood
Jan 15, 2026

A U.S. military–funded research program has developed an intranasal, self-replicating RNA (sa-mRNA) vaccine targeting H5N1 avian influenza, built using chimeric viral constructs assembled through reverse genetics.

The work was disclosed in a 2026 Nature Communications paper and explicitly funded through a U.S. Army–administered biodefense contracting mechanism.

The vaccine is said to force cells to produce H5N1 bird flu antigen while simultaneously producing viral replication enzymes that copy the self-amplifying RNA inside the cell.

The U.S. government is funding the creation of next-generation bird flu vaccines while funding the creation of purported chimeric “Frankenstein” bird flu viruses.

Congress, the White House, the Department of Energy, the FBI, the CIA, and Germany’s Federal Intelligence Service (BND) have confirmed that the COVID-19 pandemic was likely the result of lab-engineered pathogen manipulation.

Why is the government making the bird flu pandemic problem and solution at the same time, just like it was doing with coronaviruses before the COVID-19 outbreak?  (See link for article)

____________

What could possibly go wrong?

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

The War Over Your Medical Rights: AAP Sues RFK While IMA Seeks to End Medical Mandates

The war is on…..

https://thevaccinereaction.org/2026/01/aap-and-other-medical-groups-sue-secretary-of-health-and-human-services/

AAP and Other Medical Groups Sue Secretary of Health and Human Services

by Carolyn Hendler, JD

Published 

Large medical groups including the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) have sued U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. in response to recent changes to federal vaccine policy, including removal of the COVID shot from the federally recommended childhood vaccine schedule for healthy children  The AAP, American College of Physicians, Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA), American Public Health Association, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Massachusetts Public Health Alliance, and a pregnant woman filed a lawsuit in July 2025 against HHS Secretary Kennedy in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts.1

Plaintiffs alleged that changes to federal vaccine policy were made without scientific review and without following regulatory norms. They argued that the replacement of 17 members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and the cancellation of certain advisory meetings not only violated federal law, but also serves to erode public confidence in the public health infrastructure and the federal government’s mass vaccination program.

Plaintiffs aim to stop the vaccine policy changes implemented by Kennedy and restore the previous vaccine schedule.2 Plaintiffs further allege that the replacement of previous ACIP members created a new panel of biased members in order to support Kennedy’s views on vaccination and the harm associated with mRNA biologics such as the COVID shot.3

Federal Judge Allows Case to Continue

The government moved to have the case dismissed for lack of standing, but on Jan. 6, 2026, a Massachusetts federal judge decided that the lawsuit can continue.

In order to bring a lawsuit, a party needs standing which means they have shown they suffered actual and direct harm from the challenged action.4 Judge Brian Murphy of the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts ruled that the plaintiffs have legal standing to sue the Secretary.

The government argued that the plaintiffs lacked standing to sue because they failed to show that they suffered direct harm from the new vaccine schedule and the changes that took place as a result of ACIP recommendations. However, Judge Murphy concluded that the changes at ACIP violates the requirements of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, which sets forth that membership on government advisory panels be “fairly balanced.”5  (See link for article)

Important quote:

While I am somewhat surprised that the court found that plaintiffs have standing to sue here, [the ruling] reflects misperceptions about vaccines and children’s health generally [and the decision] does not reflect the reality that the American Academy of Pediatrics and other organizations are in many respects trade organizations for their professions — primarily protecting the interests of their members, not children.7 ~ Kim Mack Rosenbert, Attorney for CHD

https://imahealth.substack.com/p/breaking-imas-national-network-of?

Breaking: IMA’s National Network of Independent Doctors Anchors New Coalition to End Medical Mandates in all 50 States

“This is the next step in bringing patient-centered reform to American healthcare. We’re mobilizing thousands of independent doctors to dismantle medical mandates state by state” – Dr. Joseph Varon

 
Independent Medical Alliance
Jan 15, 2026
 
new coalition

“This is the next step in bringing patient-centered reform to American healthcare. We’re mobilizing thousands of independent doctors to dismantle medical mandates state by state, restoring true patient-informed choice and freedom.” – Dr. Joseph Varon

The Independent Medical Alliance (IMA), a powerhouse network of independent physicians, providers, and researchers, today announced its role as a founding member of the Medical Freedom Act Coalition. Launched alongside Stand for Health Freedom (SHF) and Health Freedom Defense Fund (HFDF), this alliance unites over a dozen organizations to prohibit medical mandates in all 50 states and safeguard informed consent, parental rights, and doctor-patient autonomy.

“America’s patchwork of coercive mandates is eroding patient rights,” said IMA President and Chief Medical Officer Dr. Joseph Varon. “We’re mobilizing thousands of independent doctors to dismantle them state by state and restore true freedom of choice in healthcare decisions.”

Building on Idaho’s groundbreaking 2025 Medical Freedom Act, the coalition targets the coercive regulations eroding personal health freedoms. IMA mobilizes its tens of thousands of doctors to drive state-level reforms, ensuring no American faces discrimination over medical decisions.

“No American should fear that their medical choices will impact their right to live a normal life,” said HFDF Founder Leslie Manookian in an announcement news release.

See the full Health Freedom Defense Fund news release here. For more information, contact Lynne@IMAHealth.org.

 

Category:

Activism, vaccines

Welcome to Clown World: Bayer Sues Pfizer & Moderna For Using Monsanto’s Patented GMO Technology to Build COVID Vaccines Which Are Indistinguishable From Bio-Chemical Weapons

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/bayer-lawsuit-claims-pfizer-moderna-used-monsantos-gmo-technology-covid-vaccines/?

Bayer Lawsuit Claims Pfizer, Moderna Used Monsanto’s GMO Technology to Build COVID Vaccines

Bayer on Tuesday filed a federal lawsuit, accusing Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson of unlawfully using mRNA optimization technology — originally developed by Monsanto to genetically engineer crops — as the platform for their COVID-19 vaccines, Reuters reported. Bayer acquired Monsanto in 2018.

by Brenda Baletti, Ph.D.
January 8, 2026This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website.
mrna vaccine and bayer logo

Bayer is suing COVID-19 vaccine makers Pfizer,  Moderna and Johnson & Johnson (J&J) in federal court.

The chemical giant on Tuesday accused the drugmakers of unlawfully using mRNA optimization technology — originally developed by Monsanto — as the platform for their COVID-19 vaccines, Reuters reported.

Bayer acquired Monsanto in 2018 for $63 billion.

The lawsuits claim the three companies used Monsanto’s decades-old patented technology for removing “problem sequences” from genetic code to improve mRNA stability and protein expression — obstacles the vaccine makers had previously identified as key challenges in vaccine development.

Even though J&J used a viral vector, not mRNA technology, for its vaccine, the lawsuit alleges J&J also relied on the same patented genetic engineering techniques to stabilize and amplify protein expression in its vaccines.

“Welcome to clown world,” the McCullough Foundation epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher wrote on Substack, commenting on the lawsuit.

“One of the world’s largest agrochemical companies — responsible for mass harm through its highly toxic herbicide glyphosate — is now in federal court claiming that the deadly COVID-19 ‘vaccine’ platforms were built on stolen GMO [genetically modified organism] technology.”

In the court filings, Bayer said it doesn’t want to interfere with the production of the COVID-19 vaccines, or any other mRNA vaccines. Instead, it seeks a cut of the profits from the most lucrative pharmaceutical products in history. (See link for article)

________________

**Comment**

In the the end, evil always eats its own.

Interestingly, Glyphosate has been found in all five vaccines recently tested, the COVID shots have been shown to induce cancer in 17 distinct ways according to more than 100 studies, and a major cancer journal has confirmed a global turbo cancer safety signal.

Glyphosate, cancer, and COVID shots appear to be synonymous

Please notice Bayer makes sure to posture itself by stating it wouldn’t dream of interfering with the production of the shot shots, it just wants a financial cut.

Well, isn’t that humanitarian of them?

For any still denying it, this drives the nail in the coffin that the clot shots are built with GMO technology, only instead of putting it in your mouth, you roll up your sleeve to get it injected into your muscle, which then spreads systemically and accumulates everywhere.

The shots are proven to be dangerous, unsafe and ineffective, so the experiment failed radically.
Pull them off the market already!

________________

https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/my-testimony-for-the-case-in-the

Covid Shots are Indistinguishable From Bio-Chemical Weapons

My written testimony for the case in the Netherlands against the orchestrators of the global democide falsely presented as the “Covid-19 pandemic response”.

Sasha Latypova
Dec 26, 2025

This post is very long as it contains my full written testimony for the Dutch court. The post is structured into:

  1. Case Background and video links to RechtOprecht YT channel
  2. The news coverage of the case
  3. The smear campaign
  4. Executive Summary of my testimony
  5. Full testimony

1. Case Background:

As an introduction for those who are unaware of this case, this is a short video message from Peter Stassen, the only remaining attorney on the case. His colleague, Arno van Kessel, has been imprisoned on [fabricated] charges of terrorism and disbarred:

http://  Approx. 9 Min

Peter Stassen: The Great Reset on Trial

Dec. 15, 2025

Attorney Peter Stassen has brought a lawsuit against the architects of The Great Reset and has entered testimony from experts Sasha Latypova, Catherine Austin Fitts, Dr. Joeseph Sansone, Dr. Michael Yeadon, and Katherine Watt, into the record, to prove Bill Gates, Mark Rutte, and Albert Bourla have committed crimes against humanity.

2. The News Coverage:

Recent article by The Defender providing an excellent summary of the case and developments to date:

Expert witnesses: COVID shots ‘indistinguishable from bioweapons’

During the press conference, Stassen also noted his efforts to have the Dutch courts accept his expert witnesses’ in-person testimony. He said the witnesses intend to present evidence showing that the COVID-19 shots:

  • Are “indistinguishable from bioweapons.”
  • Offer “no health benefits whatsoever.”
  • Are “neither safe nor effective.”
  • Were released in the U.S. under emergency use authorization, “a legal status that removes the enforcement of the pharmaceutical law and consumer safeguards by the FDA,” or the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
  • Are “by design, intended to cause the damage described in the package insert and reports as ‘side effects’” — including, “sudden death, heart failure, cancer, and the most horrific diseases.”
  • Are a “key component” of the “Great Reset,” “a military project in which NATO plays a significant role.”

This is coverage of this case from a Dutch newspaper (click on the English translation button): “Court rules that the defendants must show up to the hearing in person”

(See link for article & video.  An incredible amount of work went into this by Latypova et. al)

Category:

Activism, vaccines

When the Vaccine Schedule Changes, Vaccinators Panic: Watch Who Screams Loudest

When the Vaccine Schedule Changes, the Vaccinators Panic

By Susan Sweetin

NVIC’s Chief Marketing Officer

This week, officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention quietly did something extraordinary, something the co-founders and followers of NVIC have been championing for over four decades.

They thoughtfully changed the childhood vaccine schedule.

The schedule was changed to align more with streamlined vaccine schedules of other developed nations like Denmark. The changes were fundamental enough to trigger a near-instant legacy media pile-on characterized by political outrage and what can only be described as pharmaceutical industry-driven panic.

Within hours, headlines rolled out notifying the public of the change: 

  • “What to Know About the New Childhood Vaccine Schedule”
  • “Health officials slash the number of vaccines recommended for all kids”
  • “CDC changes childhood immunization schedule, removing universal recommendation for multiple shots”
  • “CDC Slashes Universal Vaccine Recommendations”

And then came the tone shift – from reporting to orchestrated narrative.

It didn’t take long for PR agencies and media outlets representing old guard mandatory vaccinators to go on the attack. Opinion writers scolded the public for doubting the safety and urgent need to give children more than 72 doses of 17 vaccines.  Senators questioned the legitimacy of HHS policymakers reducing the number of recommended vaccine doses by more than 50 percent . Cable news framed the schedule change as dangerously confusing for parents and doctors. 

The message from the vaccinators is clear: nothing needs to change and you don’t need to think, you just need to trust us and do what we tell you to do.  

That reaction tells you everything.

The Science Didn’t Collapse, It Changed Who Decides.

As Barbara Loe Fisher explained in her June 2023 commentary “It Is Time to Declare Our Independence from the Vaccinators,”  (watch it here), from the very first vaccine for smallpox, the mass vaccination system has suffered from a structural conflict of interest through a tangled web of lucrative public-private business partnerships powered by chemical companies and governments. The same individuals who develop, sell, regulate, promote, monitor, administer and mandate vaccines also have dominated the U.S. vaccine advisory committees making national vaccine policy recommendations. 

That model depends on uniform compliance. The moment vaccine recommendations shift away from the “one-size-fits-all” and “no exceptions” approach, the illusion of inevitability cracks with it and there is room for the informed consent principle, not authority and coercion, to prevail.

Universal Vaccine Mandates Are About Control, Not Health

Universal vaccine use recommendations are administratively convenient. They are politically powerful. They are profitable. They are not synonymous with personalized medicine.

When CDC officials adjust the vaccine schedule – even modestly – it implicitly acknowledges what parents have been saying for years: children are not biologically all alike, not interchangeable units, and the risks of vaccines are not evenly distributed.

That acknowledgment inherent in the recent childhood vaccine schedule change is what rattles the system. Because once medical decisions are personalized out of respect for the life of each individual, coercion becomes indefensible and informed consent must be allowed. 

Watch Who Screams the Loudest Right Now

Notice who is most alarmed by the schedule change:

  • media outlets that dismissed parental concerns for decades
  • political figures who default to “trust the experts” rhetoric
  • commentators framing truth and transparency as chaos

And notice what’s missing:

  • calm explanations of why the vaccine schedule change was made
  • acknowledgment that science evolves and nothing stays the same 
  • respect for freedom of thought and conscience as parents navigate medical decisions for their children 

Instead, the public is being warned – not informed.

Independence Was Always the Threat

NVIC has consistently stated that true vaccine policy reform begins with restoring the foundational principle of informed consent to medical risk taking – the ethical standard articulated in the Nuremberg Code that applies to all medical interventions in experimental and clinical settings alike. See NVIC’s Guide to Reforming Vaccine Policy and Law here.

The orchestrated negative reaction to this childhood vaccine schedule change confirms that the real concern of mandatory vaccinators is not measles, pertussis, COVID, or other infectious diseases, it’s public awareness that the final decision about vaccination belongs to the individual, including parents of minor children, and not to a doctor or public health official.

A Final Thought

If vaccine schedules are as scientifically unassailable as we’re told, then transparency should strengthen public trust, not threaten it.

And if the medical and public health institutions respond to every vaccine policy change with outrage, blame, and media hype promoting false narratives, then the problem isn’t public confusion, it’s institutional insecurity.
 

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines

Cancer Journal Cyberattacked After Confirming Global mRNA ‘Vaccine’ Turbo Cancer Crisis

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/breaking-major-cancer-journal-hit?

BREAKING: MAJOR Cancer Journal Hit With CYBERATTACK After Confirming Global mRNA “Vaccine” Turbo Cancer Crisis

“A Major Cancer Journal has just confirmed a global turbo cancer safety signal with the COVID-19 mRNA Injections, and they have faced a cyber attack as a result…”

Lioness of Judah Ministry
Jan 06, 2026

Source: Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Criminal DDoS attacks are blocking publication of the most comprehensive COVID-19 “vaccine” oncologic safety assessment ever conducted.

A Major Cancer Journal (Oncotarget) has just confirmed a global turbo cancer safety signal with the COVID-19 mRNA Injections.

And they have faced a cyber attack as a result, purportedly and possibly, from members associated with Pub Peer or what’s called Pub Smear, the Pub Smear mob, may be involved in illegal and criminal activities.

This has disrupted access to the study.

Due to this, the journal can not put this important paper into the public domain because they are currently under cyber intrusion.

The incident has been reported to the FBI and they are currently in contact with federal investigators to find out who is behind this criminal activity, preventing critical cancer data from being released to the public.  (See link for article)

_______________

Important quote:

For the first time, a major cancer journal has consolidated what many clinicians, pathologists, and researchers have already recognized and placed it permanently into the peer-reviewed scientific record. At this point, continued refusal by federal health agencies to acknowledge these signals represents criminal negligence.

Hence, the paper had to be ‘disappeared,’ a common tactic now.

Those responsible for cybercriminal interference will ultimately be held accountable — and regulators who ignored or suppressed post-vaccination cancer signals cannot escape responsibility for the human consequences. Every preventable post-vaccination cancer now rests squarely with regulatory authorities who ignored, dismissed, or suppressed clear safety warnings.

Source

It’s gettin’ hot in the kitchen!

The attacked paper only shows what experts have been screaming about for YEARS.  The gene therapy shots causing cancer is nothing new.

For more:

For Hope:

Category:

Activism, Cancer, vaccines