Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

HHS ‘Declaration of Emergency’ for Bird Flu Paves Way for PCR Testing and More EUA Vaccines, Critics Say

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/hhs-declaration-of-emergency-bird-flu-pcr-testing-eua-vaccines/

HHS ‘Declaration of Emergency’ for Bird Flu Paves Way for PCR Testing and More EUA Vaccines, Critics Say

Public health authorities have taken a series of actions in recent weeks to facilitate the possible future distribution of bird flu testing and vaccines, even as the CDC maintains the current public health risk from bird flu is low.

by Brenda Baletti, Ph.D.
JULY 29, 2024
chicken and pcr test

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) this month issued a declaration of emergency, announcing that some flu viruses — including H5N1 bird flu — could cause a pandemic and threaten national security.

The announcement by HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra amended a 2013 section of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic (FD&C) Act, which allows the agency to extend the availability of medical countermeasures to pandemic influenza A viruses, including the currently circulating H5N1 strain of bird flu.

Prior to the amendment, the declaration covered only the previous H7N9 strain of bird flu.

The announcement specified that current circumstances justify the emergency use authorization (EUA) of in vitro diagnostics such as RT-PCR tests to detect bird flu and other pandemic influenza A viruses.

“This paves the way for more EUA vaccines, devices and products to possibly be effective against these new and unknown viruses,” attorney Ray Flores told The Defender.

He added:

“Just as EUA PCR tests exaggerated the COVID-19 pandemic, the detection of avian influenza and influenza A viruses with pandemic potential via unlicensed PCR tests is destined to justify lockdowns, masking, invasive nasal swabs, and wide-scale vaccination with experimental mRNA technology.

“The stage is set for RT-PCR tests to take the pivotal role of determining false positives with amped up cycle thresholds designed to declare asymptomatic, otherwise healthy people to be infected — just like last time.”

Under the FD&C Act, HHS can take steps to facilitate countermeasures only after the secretary of either the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of Defense or HHS determines there is an emergency or potential for an emergency involving a chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear agent that may threaten the national or health security of U.S. citizens.

After that determination, the HHS secretary can declare that existing circumstances justify an EUA that would allow the FDA to authorize previously unlicensed drugs or vaccines or previously unapproved uses of licensed drugs.

The amendment covers animal or human flu viruses — circulating in wild birds, humans, or domestic animals — that may infect humans, may have caused pandemics in the past or may mutate to cause a pandemic in humans for which they have no prior immunity.

Becerra said in the amendment that the bird flu viruses may pose a public health threat, despite acknowledging that it “may initially only be occasionally transmitted to or between humans.” However, he added that bird flu viruses may “have the potential to become highly transmissible in humans and can cause significant morbidity and mortality.”

The currently circulating H5N1 virus is one in a series of bird flu viruses that pose such a threat, although the virus is not easily transmissible to humans and none of the human cases reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) involved severe disease, the announcement said.

“We cannot be sure,” Becerra said, that the mild cases associated with dairy cattle represent the full spectrum of the disease, “nor can we be assured that the virus will not mutate to cause more severe disease and/or to become more transmissible.”

The CDC reports the current public health risk is low and that surveillance shows “no indicators of unusual influenza activity in people, including avian influenza A(H5).”

There have been a total of 14 reported human cases since 2022, according to the agency. Four occurred after exposure to dairy cows, 10 after exposure to poultry and none have been serious.

Hand in glove holding vaccine

The Vaccine Safety Project

AMA updates vaccine codes for potential EUA vaccine

The day after Becerra’s announcement, on July 19, the American Medical Association (AMA) announced an update to its Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes to include a new code for bird flu vaccines, should they receive EUA from the FDA.

CPT codes are used by providers to report healthcare procedures and services and to update medical records.

The AMA said it is publishing the code update now “to ensure electronic systems across the U.S. health care system are prepared in advance for the potential FDA authorization.”

The update included new codes for administering the potential bird flu vaccine to both children and adults.

The new code is for a cell-culture-derived vaccine adjuvanted for intramuscular use, which refers to an inactivated flu virus grown in cultured mammalian cells.

Cell-culture vaccines are a newer technology developed to replace the traditional egg-based vaccine production for flu vaccines. It is said to be cleaner, faster and more scalable than its predecessor.

Vaccine producer contracted to produce millions of doses of bird flu vaccines

The creation of the codes also follows an agreement, announced May 30, between the U.S. government and CSL Seqirus — one of the largest vaccine producers in the world — to complete 4.8 million doses of a “pre-pandemic vaccine that is well-matched to the H5 of the currently circulating H5N1 strain,” as part of the U.S. National Pre-Pandemic Influenza Vaccine Stockpile program.

HHS Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response Dawn O’Connell told reporters some of those shots could be available as early as this month, Reuters reported.

This was the fourth contract awarded to CSL Seqirus under a multi-year agreement with the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), which largely pays for the vaccines.

Marc Lacey, CSL Seqirus global executive director for the pandemic, said in the press release that the CDC maintains that bird flu poses a low risk to public health. However, “This agreement, building upon prior agreements with BARDA, will help support the U.S. government’s ability to respond swiftly in the event that the current avian flu situation changes.”

Seqirus manufactures the vaccines in Holly Springs, North Carolina, at a $1 billion facility built in 2009 and opened in 2013 through a partnership between Novartis and BARDA that was in part facilitated by grants and tax incentives from local government.

CSL Seqirus’ parent company acquired Novartis’ facility in 2014.

The facility is the largest producer of cell-based vaccines in the world, with the capacity to deliver up to 150 million flu vaccines within six months of an emergency pandemic declaration. Then it could continue to produce large quantities of vaccines.

Their massive vaccine production capacity, the company said, is dependent on continued research and development along with seasonal vaccine manufacturing, which provides a “warm base” for pandemic production. That means the production of seasonal vaccines makes it possible for the company to maintain the materials and personnel necessary to produce massive vaccine quantities.

CSL Seqirus’ H5N8 avian influenza vaccine received the European Union’s marketing authorization in April. The vaccine requires a two-dose series, with the second dose administered at least three weeks after the first.

The European Commission Health Emergency Preparedness and Response (HERA) program in June announced the purchase of 665,000 doses of CSL Seqirus’ H5N8 avian influenza vaccine, with an option to acquire another 40 million doses over the next four years.

Finland already plans to offer the CSL Seqirus H5N8 bird flu vaccine to approximately 10,000 people deemed at high risk of exposure to the virus.

WHO announces project to fast-track mRNA bird flu vaccines

The World Health Organization (WHO) today announced a new project to speed up the “development and accessibility” of an mRNA bird flu vaccine for manufacturers in low- and middle-income countries as part of the mRNA Technology Transfer Programme.

The same program was used to help develop and transfer the mRNA platform for COVID-19 to the developing world.

Earlier this month, BARDA awarded $176 million to Moderna to develop and test its pre-pandemic mRNA vaccine against H5N1.

Late-stage testing would begin in 2025, pending results from the Phase 1/2 trial of five different mRNA vaccine options testing on about 1,500 people that concluded last week.

The contract includes options to speed up the development timeline if there is an increase in the number of human cases, the severity of the virus or if human-to-human transmission becomes possible, Reuters reported.

The U.S. government is also in talks with Pfizer about possibly supporting its development of an mRNA vaccine targeting the H5 family of bird flu viruses, according to the Financial Times.

‘Mock-up’ vaccines allow industry to roll out experimental shots with little testing

Becerra’s declaration offered a brief overview of previous bird flu viruses that threatened public health, citing the 2009 A/H1N1 influenza pandemic and the H7N9, in 2013-2014.

High mortality rates allegedly associated with these strains were offered as justification for concern that although the current bird flu strain does not easily transmit to humans and is not particularly virulent, it could become so.

Discussing this hypothesis and the possible reasons behind it with Children’s Health Defense (CHD) Chief Scientific Officer Brian Hooker, Ph.D., on a recent episode of his CHD.TV show “Doctors & Scientists,” internist Dr. Meryl Nass said:

“The people who make their money by warning us about pandemics, by selling pandemic products, people who get promotions because they have developed pandemic vaccines or been involved in some way in tests or other, the pandemic industry has been very interested for over 20 years in figuring out ways to give experimental vaccines that they develop very quickly to an entire population without having to test them. Because if you test them, it takes months longer before you can give them out, and your pandemic is likely to be over at that point.

“You need to roll them out fast if you’re going to use them. And if you’re going to cause a nation to spend millions or billions of dollars buying them, you’re going to have to come up with them quickly.”

Nass explained how the industry can quickly create and roll out new pandemic vaccines in the U.S. by creating “mock-up” vaccines that are later used as platforms for new vaccines. Drugmakers use existing vaccines as substrates and can insert new antigens into them when a new virus strain appears in what Nass called a “plug and play” approach to making new vaccines.

Nass reviewed the three currently approved bird flu vaccines, raising serious questions about the small size of the clinical trials and serious adverse events in the trials, including fatalities.

For example, she said, Sanofi Pasteur’s bird flu vaccine was licensed in 2007 for the national stockpile based on a clinical trial of only 103 subjects. One of those subjects died and three others experienced a serious adverse event, including cancer.

In trials for GSK’s vaccine, licensed in 2013, 0.5% of subjects experienced serious adverse events, including thyroid cancer and cerebral vascular events. In the trials for Audenz, CSL Seqirus’ H5N1 vaccine, serious adverse events occurred in all age groups, including deaths in older adults.

These vaccines, she said, are prototypes for vaccines that could be emergency authorized for the current virus.

According to Nass, the media are telling people — referring to a May 2024 article in The Guardian — “the only question is when do we pull the trigger on these vaccines?”Nass added that the U.S. government in May relaxed the rules for handling bird viruses so they could be examined in regular hospital labs rather than high-security labs.

“So the U.S. government is trying to imply that this is a deadly virus, but they’re acknowledging it is basically a nothing burger virus for humans at this time,” she said.

However, she warned, the vaccines themselves could be dangerous.

Brenda Baletti, Ph.D.

Brenda Baletti, Ph.D., is a senior reporter for The Defender. She wrote and taught about capitalism and politics for 10 years in the writing program at Duke University. She holds a Ph.D. in human geography from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and a master’s from the University of Texas at Austin.

For more:

BIRD FLU IS JUST LIKE COVID. THE SAME PEOPLE, TELLING THE SAME LIES, FOR THE SAME REASONS

Category:

Activism, Testing, vaccines, Viruses

What Are The Prospects for the U.S. Since EU Has Banned Dental Mercury Amalgams?

The European Union Council has confirmed the decision of the EU Parliament to ban dental mercury amalgams starting in 2025. 

Mercury is one of the most harmful substances among the seemingly limitless pollutants present in a modern industrial nation. From the early “Mad Hatter” archetypes based on hatters using mercury in their work, to massive mercury pollution in Japan in the 20th Century, this substance has had a devastating impact on human health. Now Europe has stepped up with a ban on mercury-containing amalgam dental fillings.

World-wide momentum for a ban

On May 30th, 2024, we received confirmation that the European Union is banning dental amalgam fillings, which are about half mercury. The use and export of amalgam must end on January 1, 2025, and the manufacture and the import are banned as of July 1, 2026. The EU action applies to all 27 of its member states. The EU’s action comes on the heels of increasing crackdowns on dental amalgam in Europe, with bans by Sweden, Norway, and Denmark in 2009 and, in more recent years, moves by Finland, Ireland, Netherlands, Italy, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Moldova to also ban amalgams. There are ten other countries that are discouraging amalgam use, adding to the world-wide momentum against dental amalgam, a momentum that the US and its closest allies, Canada, the UK and Australia have so far resisted. That leaves the question: what is wrong with the US and its close allies? Can’t they see the same science and the same abundant clinical evidence that amalgam fillings, which are half mercury, are harmful? It is estimated that of all the people who have dental restorations, at least half of them have mercury amalgam fillings.

Alfred Stock’s important research

There has been a pitched battle in the US over the amalgam issue for three or four decades. Looking back even farther, we can also mention the work of Professor Alfred Stock, a prominent German chemist who, in the 1920s, discovered that his forgetfulness and brain fog were being caused by his own dental amalgam fillings. Stock’s health improved after he had his own amalgams removed, and he then diagnosed many friends’ problems and encouraged them to have their amalgams removed. He published more than thirty scientific papers on the subject, until his laboratory and most of his records were destroyed by allied bombing raids in World War II. That unfortunate bombing ended his research, and he died in near obscurity. (1)

Alfred Stock

Dr. Hal Huggins

But the torch never went out

A Brazilian dentist named Pinto incorporated Professor Stock’s science into his own investigations, and he passed on the information to his dentist son, Dr. Olympio Pinto. The latter met up with American dentist Dr. Hal Huggins at a conference in Mexico City in 1973. Pinto revealed that mercury from dental amalgams does leak, and Hal Huggins became a leading investigator of the issue in North America. On into the 1980s and 1990s, Dr. Huggins became a leading critic of amalgams, the head of a busy biological dental clinic in Colorado Springs, CO, and a favorite target of the American Dental Association’s (ADA’s) hostile attacks.

CBS 60 Minutes was a rare truthful media event

In 1990, CBS 60 Minutes did a resounding episode on the dental amalgam issue that was seen on TV by 30 million viewers. The ADA agreed to be interviewed on the show provided that Hal Huggins was not included in the program as one of the amalgam critics. The program catapulted the amalgam issue into public prominence and fueled the growth of holistic dental practices, the growth of scientific investigations, and a surge in consumer activism. DAMS, Dental Amalgam Mercury Solutions was formed in 1990, to educate the public, complementing the work already being done by the professional academies, IAOMT, IABDM and Holistic Dental Association. All of these groups emphasize the importance of having your amalgams removed safely, by a well-trained, well-equipped biological dentist, if they are going to be removed at all. (2)

 Witchhunts of the 1990s

But the 1990s saw major attacks by state dental boards against Hal Huggins in Colorado and against many other dentists in many other states. In 1995, the Colorado Dental Board took away Huggins’ license to practice, and the boards in many other states acted similarly. It was an era of “witchhunts,” with dentists who were removing dental amalgams of their patients being accused of practicing outside of the “standard of care” and of being “unethical.” The local media generally went along with the portrayal of Huggins and his followers as both being driven by greed and going against what the science says – science as described by the ADA.

The Watson-Burton bill

In 2003 a Congressional panel held hearings on the dental amalgam issue and what science actually says. Republican Dan Burton and Democrat Diane Watson jointly became chief authors of a bill to phase out dental amalgam fillings. It was assigned to the House Commerce Committee where it languished and died because it did not get nearly enough co-sponsors to get it a hearing in the committee. Sadly, the media let the issue whither for lack of attention; ever since the CBS 60 Minutes show in 1990, the major media has either ignored the issue or tells the ADA’s biased side of it.

The CATs media multimillion dollar blitz

In April of 2006, some very biased NIH-sponsored studies known as the Children Amalgam Trials (CATS) were completed and published, followed by an immediate media/public relations campaign claiming that, with the two studies, dental amalgams had definitely been shown to be safe for children (the implication being that they must be safe for everyone, so what should adults be worried about?). The DAMS newsletter published a detailed analysis showing that the study’s toxicological questions had not even been completed yet, and the data itself showed signs of mercury retention, particularly in boys. Critics of the studies said that these clinical trials were highly unethical pointing to the experimentation on young children from an orphanage, lured into participation with incentive gifts. But the big media ran with it without mentioning the research defects.

2009 FDA issues an amalgam rule

For decades, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had been dancing around the dental amalgam issue, failing to classify it (i.e., moderate risk, highest risk -requiring a proof of safety?), and finally on July 28, 2009, it did come out with an amalgam “rule.” It offered no protection to the public, and it looked like it had been written by the amalgam industry and the ADA.

The rule said: there was no reason to be careful of amalgam use in children (citing the defective CAT studies); no reason to be cautious about its use in pregnant women; no need for caution for people with neurological disorders (mercury is a notorious neurotoxin) or kidney problems; and no need to inform the patient that amalgam fillings contain mercury.

Dr Margaret Hamburg MD

Obama appointee, Dr Margaret Hamburg, MD, was the FDA commissioner at the time, and she participated in shaping the rule even though she had a glaring conflict of interest: she had served on the board of Henry Schein, Inc, America’s largest amalgam distributor and had received several hundreds of thousands of dollars for serving on its board.

The Global Mercury Ban Treaty

For many years, the countries of the world met annually to hammer out a global ban on mercury. In October 2013, 139 countries gathered in Minimata, Japan, to sign the treaty. While the treaty did help the environment by cracking down on mercury in thermometers, thermostats, and other industrial uses, it was very weak in its mention of dental amalgam. It also totally sidestepped mercury in vaccines, where it is injected directly into the human body as thimerosal, a preservative. So, it was a sweetheart deal for the ADA and for big pharma and its toxic vaccines. As far as protecting the public from its worst exposures to mercury, amalgams and vaccines, the reality was that the treaty missed the mark. But the annual global meetings were productive in giving a chance for the people gathered to share information about the dental amalgam issue and gave many of them the resolve to go back home and work for an amalgam ban in their own countries.

Conclusion 

The dental-medical/political-media establishment in the USA is very wedded to what appears to be a dental amalgam mercury cover-up. The media seems to have a pact to stay on message with the cover-up. Deep motives for this misconduct could possibly include: 1) avoiding the embarrassment and shame of being wrong on a hugely important public health issue and the resulting loss of funding and power, 2) a possible desire to  boost the profits of big pharma (people with illnesses and disorders provide a steady flow of customers for big pharma, and you can note that the biggest contributors to the ADA Health Foundation, in the million dollar category, are Pfizer and GlaxoSmithKline), 3) possible population reduction (mercury is a reproductive toxin, causing birth defects and miscarriages), and 4) possibly mind control (mercury weakens a person’s mental clarity, perhaps making a person more willing to be a cog in a machine, guided by media messages, and by governmental authority figures).

Getting America, Canada, and the UK to ban amalgam mercury fillings looks daunting. Getting the media to cover the important issues of mercury and other major toxins also appears daunting. But many people out there are hungry for truth and for protecting freedom. Perhaps together we can all vow to carry on, so that the torch of truth and freedom never dies.

Authored by Leo Cashman, Executive Director of DAMS, Dental Amalgam Mercury Solutions, and Co-founder of National Health Freedom Coalition and National Health Freedom Action.

(1) It’s All in Your Head, the Link Between Mercury Amalgam and Illness, by Hal A Huggins, DDS 1993-page x and also pages 61-62.

(2) https://iaomt.org/resources/safe-removal-amalgam-fillings/  This web page describes the academy’s latest, most elaborate protocol for safe amalgam removal.

For more:

Category:

Activism, Dentistry, vaccines

The Century of Forgotten Vaccine ‘Hot Lot’ Disasters

The following is important information to know as ‘hot lots’ have occurred with the COVID gene therapy injections.  In fact, 71% of serious adverse events came from 4.2% of doses (high risk batches) and 100% of reported deaths were caused by just 5% of batches.  

On one day alone in New Zealand, 30 people who got the COVID shot at the same site died.

But, did you know there’s been ‘hot lots’ all throughout the history of vaccines?  I didn’t.  Read on….

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-century-of-forgotten-hot-lot?

The Century of Forgotten Vaccine Hot Lot Disasters

How the mantra of “safe and effective” has shielded countless compromised products from scrutiny and led to the same disasters continuously repeating.

A MIDWESTERN DOCTOR
JUL 12, 2024
  • Producing a vaccine has many opportunities for error or contamination. Because of this, disasters continually occur from “hot vaccine lots” being unleashed onto the public. Remarkably, as the years have gone by, there has been less and less accountability for this (e.g., previously public investigations were held and people went to jail whereas now government tends to keep the hot lots on the market and deny there is a problem).
  • In 1967, an eminent bacteriologist wrote a book detailing many forgotten vaccine disasters under the belief (he shared with many of his anonymous colleagues) that unless his profession was honest about the dangers of vaccination, the mistakes which led to those disasters would keep on repeating.
  • Many of the disasters he detailed related to an excessively dangerous vaccine lot being released onto the market. Remarkably, many of the disasters he detailed mirrored what occurred in the decades that followed (e.g., this article discusses the documented DPT and anthrax hot lots which caused a tsunami of injuries in infants and veterans).
  • One of the largest problems with the COVID-19 vaccines were the deadly hot lots that were released onto the market. In this article, I will cover everything we know about those lots and show their remarkable parallels to the century of hot lot disasters which preceded them.

During the COVID-19 rollout, patients gradually began to realize that some of the COVID-19 vaccines were more dangerous than others. Initially this was written off as a conspiracy theory. However, as time moved forward, and more evidence emerged to support the “hot lot” hypothesis there was an increasing acceptance of this theory.

At the time, the most common theory I heard raised to account for this was that a large global experiment was being done to assess the effects of various mRNA doses (e.g., one researcher was able to show that the hot lots of each COVID vaccine brand hit the market at different times in a manner that seemed to be coordinated between the manufacturers and that Pfizer’s lots contained a simple code that correlated to their toxicity).  (See link for history of hot lots)

http://

COVID Shots & Children: Absolutely No Need

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya

July 30, 2024

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya addresses the important trade-offs involved in COVID shot recommendations, particularly their varying impacts on children and older adults. He explains that the benefits for children are minimal due to their low risk of severe illness, while potential side effects pose greater concerns. Dr. Bhattacharya also discusses concerns around childhood vaccines and autism, emphasizing the importance of experimental ethics and design.

What Bhattacharya doesn’t mention is the quickly deployed gene therapy injections never underwent adequate safety and toxicological testing and were never tested for reduction in hospitalization, death, or transmission, rather they were tested for reduction in severe symptoms – which is not the proper endpoint for “vaccine” efficacy. They have been contaminated with all sorts of impurities including numerous metals including graphene, parasites & their eggs, moving, self-aware ‘organisms,’ particulate foreign matter, PEG, nanotech, lipid nanoparticles, black particles and white floating matter, impurities from human fetal cell lines, DNA contamination and SV40 sequences. The shot gets into fetuses at all stages of development, a rat study shows prenatal exposure to COVID mRNA induces autism-like behaviors, a reanalysis of the mRNA trial data shows 1 serious event per 800 shots, a government commissioned report show Pfizer and Moderna shots cause myocarditis, the Thailand study showing 1 in 43 teens got myocarditis after the COVID shot, and a major collaborative study on effectiveness shows 100% of myocarditis in children is caused by the shots with NO BENEFIT in reduction of infection. Another study shows nearly everyone getting the shots is experiencing some amount of heart damage, and yet another study show cumulative cardiotoxicity occurring with each and every shot.

Dr. Bhattacharya doesn’t even poke a stick at these crucial matters.

http://

‘We’ve Been Lied To’: The Reanalysis of COVID Shot Trials

Dr. Aseem Malhotra, July 25, 2024

A 1 in 800 harm rate causing hospitalization and disability is unacceptable.
The Swine Flu vaccine was pulled globally for causing GBS in 1 in 100,000.

________________

**Comment**

Big Pharma euphemistically has termed unwanted biological contaminants in vaccines “adventitious agents.”

Some examples include:

  • mycoplasma
  • prions
  • bacteriophages
  • retroviruses
  • viruses
  • Bacillus cereus

Hot lots have existed for the following ‘vaccines’:

  • diphtheria
  • tetanus
  • polio
  • yellow fever
  • rabies
  • tubercuosis
  • typhoid
  • bubonic plague
  • cholera
  • measles and antiserums
  • mumps
  • hepatitis B
  • HIV

The article also gives a previous article, which provided the century of evidence linking vaccination (particularly DPT vaccination) to sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and the clear mechanisms which had been established to cause that death. The issues with the DPT vaccine have been known for over a century.

The author believes five of the most damaging vaccines released to the American public were the smallpox vaccine, the old DPT vaccine, the HPV vaccine, the COVID-19 vaccines, and the anthrax vaccine, which strong evidence links to Gulf War Syndrome affecting 36% of soldiers.

By studying the history, you will notice an eerie number of parallels and that many of the injuries were very similar, but the government has had a nearly identical insistence on keeping the vaccine on the market and covering up every injury that occurred.

A very thorough article.  A definite ‘must read’.  There’s also an important video with Dr. David Gortler who previously served as a senior advisor at the FDA at a panel Senator Ron Johnson held about the COVID vaccine disaster.  He explains how the contamination and widespread variability seen in the hot lots are being completely ignored as well as how the complete lack of transparency as to what is actually in the vaccines is unprecedented.

“Vaccines” have NEVER been safe or effective.

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

More Leaked RKI Protocols Reveal Germany’s Sanctioned Abuse

If you are unfamiliar with the German RKI Protocols for COVID, read this first:   https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2024/04/05/german-rki-files-more-pandemic-fraud/

https://worldcouncilforhealth.substack.com/p/breaking-leaked-german-rki-protocols?

BREAKING: Leaked German RKI Protocols expose the shocking truth of government-sanctioned abuse

The dam has burst. They took away basic human rights, imposed draconian measures and mandatory novel gene injections on humanity, and claimed it was for our health. They lied.

 
WORLD COUNCIL FOR HEALTH
JUL 28, 2024

In a shocking revelation, the 4,000-page protocols of the German equivalent of the CDC, the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), have been leaked by an anonymous whistleblower of the RKI to the public, exposing the truth behind the government’s handling of the pandemic.

Whilst the first insights into the protocols were paid for via a Freedom of Information Act request by the journal Multipolar in March 2024, most relevant passages had been redacted. These protocols, which cover the period from 2020 to 2023, reveal that political decisions were made without scientific basis, leading to the imposition of draconian measures and the unnecessary injection of the public with untested gene therapy.

Recently, Anthony Fauci, responsible for the Covid measures in the US, had admitted that the social distancing rule was completely fabricated and without scientific back up and in another statement, admitted that masks do not work.

In the UK the “Lockdown files” also revealed the results of “putting medical decisions in the hands of people with no medical decision-making experience or expertise, so long as they were ‘nice chaps’ and went to the right school.”

A recent publication states that the three primary causes of death associated with the excess all-cause mortality in the last years are due to mandated measures such as lockdowns, harmful medical interventions such as the use of ventilators, the denial of use of antibiotics and the use of Covid gene injections. In light of this, the German revelations require strict consequences. The study’s authors calculated that Covid-19 vaccine deaths, up to 30 December 2022, number a staggering 16.9 million people.

Unveiling the lies

Sensationally, even one of the German mainstream media tabloids, Bild, reported that the leaked RKI protocols expose five major untruths that politicians spread during the pandemic. As you read these, keep in mind the measures that the German people were subjected to: besides mask mandates and social distancing rules, a ‘lockdown of the unvaccinated’ banned people from entering shops, restaurants, schools, bars and other public places, including parks and forests. Compulsory vaccination was imposed on military members and all people working in the health sector. Covid injections are still recommended for all children over 6 months. Questioning doctors had their licenses withdrawn, many have been sent to prison. A member of the German army was just imprisoned for failing to obey the order to get injected.

 

Untruth #1: children need to be vaccinated against Covid-19

It turns out the RKI deemed child vaccination unnecessary, (Protocol,19/05/2021) as the virus did not seriously endanger children and was not a driver of infection waves. Note that countries like Sweden, which did not comply with the concept of a one-world (health) medicine introduced by the WHO, left schools open, and did not introduce masks, were able to demonstrate no deaths due to Covid at all, and coincidentally the Swedish population shows the lowest excess mortality rate in Europe.

Untruth #2: the Astra Zeneca ‘vaccine’ is safe

The AstraZeneca (AZ) injection was associated with dangerous side effects, contrary to the claims made by the Federal Ministry of Health. They knew early on that the AZ injection increased the risk of sinus vein thrombosis by 20 times but despite this realization, a few weeks later the then Chancellor Angela Merkel, Vice-Chancellor Olaf Scholz, Federal President Frank-Walter Steinmeier, the then Health Minister Jens Spahn and Karl Lauterbach were apparently publicly injected with AstraZeneca, together with the call to the population to do the same as these politicians.

Untruth #3: the unvaccinated are dangerous

Thirdly, the government’s assertion that the unvaccinated posed a danger to others was unfounded, as the RKI found no evidence of a “pandemic of the unvaccinated.” Even further on 19 March 2021 in the protocols, they emphasise that “Covid-19 should not be compared with influenza, because normal influenza waves kill more people, although Covid-19 is worrying for other reasons.”

Untruth #4: masks stop the spread

Fourthly, the RKI did not recommend the FFP-2 mask requirement and the 3-G and 2-G rules. Considering that natural science has produced over 170 studies demonstrating the ineffectiveness and harm of masks and that Pfizer never demonstrated a reduced infection or reduced transmission in the approval trials, the question remains as to why these recommendations were made and why, in Germany, even today, brave doctors are sentenced to years of imprisonment for issuing mask exemptions.

Untruth #5: restrictions were justified

Another quote in the protocols from 8 January 2021, was whether the time had come to “depart from the narrative of herd immunity via vaccination” now that vaccines were actually available.  A remark on 5 March 2021 showed that restrictions for the unvaccinated and as-yet-uninfected were “not technically justifiable” and contrary to World Health Organization ethical guidelines and an extended discussion on 19 March 2021 was about why no mortality-reducing effects were yet visible after 7 million of the most vulnerable Germans had been jabbed.

Many more facts will surface shortly, but we should be on high alert as unelected organizations such as the WHO plan the next public measures in response to bird flu or Disease X.

Facts exposed so far by the RKI protocol include:

(Note that quotes from the protocols are direct translations)

  1. Covid-19 was no more dangerous than influenza. RKI protocol 19/03/2021, page 2352 reads: “Not yet seen that fewer old people are dying due to the vaccination effect? Is it too early? Are vaccinated people dying? The curves need to be observed closely. It is rather reassuring if the median age of deaths does not shift. The main risk of dying from COVID-19 is age. COVID-19 should not be compared to influenza, more people die in normal influenza epidemics”.

  2. Risk elevation to a ‘pandemic’ was initiated by one single, external actor.

  3. There was no evidence in favor of mandatory masks (not even FFP2). RKI protocol 30/10/2020, page 1716 reads: “FFP2 masks are an occupational health and safety measure. If people are not trained/qualified personnel, FFP2 masks have no added value if they are not fitted and used correctly. The limitations are clearly outlined in the document and there is no evidence to support the use of FFP2 masks outside of occupational health and safety, this could also be made available to the public. Previous studies on the effectiveness of FFP2 masks have failed due to masks not being worn or not being worn correctly, their benefit should remain limited to occupational safety of people working with infectious patients.”

  4. Efficiency of Covid medication was known, yet not recommended. RKI Protocol 24/02/2020, page 214 reads: “New study shows chloroquine efficacy in therapy, reduces disease severity, evidence is hardening, is plausible in terms of content, is also discussed today in STAKOB TK.”

  5. It was known that lockdowns are more dangerous than coronavirus itself.

  6. There was no evidence for protective effect of mRNA gene therapy (vaccination). RKI Protocol 06/01/2021, page 1999 reads: “Evaluation of positive reaction in screening tests of vaccinated people: It has been reported by several organisations that positive results were observed in rapid antigen tests immediately after vaccination.”

  7. Testing of asymptomatic people was misleading.

  8. There was no asymptomatic transmission.

  9. There was no evidence-based downgrading of risk assessment for political reasons.

  10. There was no infection with Ct values of more than 30 in PCR tests.

  11. The cohort study ‘Diamond Princess’ showing that the estimates of deaths from arch-modeller Neil Ferguson were far too high, was known but ignored.

  12. The PCR incidence thresholds of 35 or 50 were arbitrarily set by Jens Spahn (former Minister of Health) and Head of the Chancellery, Braun. RKI protocol 03/02/2020, page 78 reads: “A positive PCR result after recovery does not necessarily mean infectiousness.”

  13. Necessary symptoms (i.e. fever) of infection were dropped to keep case numbers artificially high. RKI protocols 23/11/2020, page 1818 reads: “Surveillance
    Corona-KiTa study (slides here). FluWeb: Frequency of acute respiratory diseases: below seasonal average in all age groups, decreasing trend.”

  14. The low risk for children was known. RKI protocol 26/02/2020, page 232 reads: (Observations / results from China) Age distribution: children 2% of cases in large study, paediatric hospital confirmed all without complications; also not prevalent in transmission chains; schools, daycare centres are not in the foreground, children not important links in transmission chains; excreted in stool for a long time but unclear whether live virus; role of children rather atypically subordinate (unlike influenza), more studies need to be done.”

Politically motivated decisions

Contrary to claims that vital political decisions were based on scientific evidence, the RKI protocols reveal that these decisions were made without scientific backing. The conference of the minister presidents of the 16 federal states, led by Chancellor Angela Merkel, made decisions that ignored the scientific advice provided by the RKI.

Unjustified agitation and blame

The media played a significant role in agitating against the unvaccinated and spreading misinformation. The protocols confirm that children were not significant virus transmitters, contradicting the shaming and blaming they endured.

The harmful consequences

The leaked RKI protocols shed light on the consequences of these decisions, which caused unprecedented economic harm to the middle class and small and medium-sized businesses. Children also suffered unnecessary harm, and three-quarters of the population were subjected to novel, untested gene therapy injections, with currently at least 20 million deaths and untold damage to body systems. These revelations call for legal investigations into the authorities’ actions.

Conclusion

The release of the uncensored RKI protocols has exposed the truth behind the government’s handling of the pandemic in Germany and most likely all over the world. The protocols reveal that political decisions were made without scientific basis, leading to the imposition of draconian measures, total control and the spread of real misinformation. It is crucial that these revelations are thoroughly evaluated and that legal investigations are conducted to ensure accountability.

We must ensure that independent science and a decentralized medical approach that accommodates repurposed drugs, micronutrients, diet, our microbiome, and so on, should be the basis of medical measures in case of real threats. These novel gene therapy injections called covid vaccines may have modified humanity forever. We need to ensure that, as set out in the Nuremberg Code after the Second World War, free will and informed consent form the basis of any treatment, and that unethical medical experimentation and coercion never happens again.

The World Council for Health firmly stands behind a better way.

Sources:

  1. Bild, 2024

  2. Brownstone, 2024

  3. Express, 2023

  4. Fauci, 2023

  5. Fauci, 2024

  6. Mortality watch, 2024

  7. Multipolar, 2024

  8. Nachdenkerseiten, 2024

  9. Pressekonferenz, 2024

  10. Rancourt, 2024

  11. Welt, 2024

  12. Weltwoche, 2024

  13. WHO, 2024

 

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Gardasil Fails to Protect Against Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Over Time

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/gardasil-fails-to-protect-against?

Gardasil Fails to Protect Against Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Over Time

Enthusiasm Over a Vaccine to Prevent Cervical Cancer Fades with Longitudinal Data

JUL 30, 2024

By Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine in 2006 progressing to Gardasil 9, a 9-valent vaccine, for use in children as young as 9 years old in December 2014. The CDC recommends the HPV vaccine as part of the routine vaccination schedule for children ages 11–12, but it can be given as early as age 9. The vaccine is also recommended for adults up to age 26, and in 2018 the FDA expanded the age range to include adults up to age 45.

Adcock R, Kang H, Castle PE, et al. Population-Based Incidence of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Across 14 Years of HPV Vaccination. JAMA Oncol. Published online July 25, 2024. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.2673

Adcock et al obtained data from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2020, from the New Mexico HPV Pap Registry (NMHPVPR), the only comprehensive US statewide monitoring system for cervical cancer prevention. Over fourteen years through which the HPV vaccination should have had a population effect, the results are disappointing for the higher grades of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 and 3, which are findings from a cervical biopsy that indicates abnormal cells on the cervix’s surface. It’s also known as high-grade or moderate dysplasia (CIN-2) and carcinoma in situ (CIN-3). CIN 2/3 is usually caused by infection with certain types of human papillomavirus (HPV).

The vaccine may be failing due to resistant strains, lack of compliance, or other reasons. It is possible that any favorable vaccine trend is overwhelmed by more intensive screening efforts. The main point for parents is not to be falsely reassured—HPV vaccination fails to protect against CIN-2 and CIN-3 on a population basis. So pelvic exams and PAP smears are necessary for sexually active teens and young women.

Adcock R, Kang H, Castle PE, et al. Population-Based Incidence of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Across 14 Years of HPV Vaccination. JAMA Oncol. Published online July 25, 2024. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.2673

Please read up on Gardasil and HPV:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/09/03/editors-of-medical-journals-confirm-hpv-vaccines-cause-more-harm-than-good-science-author-facing-death-threats/

For more:

Category:

Activism, Cancer, vaccines, Viruses