Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

Aluminium in Brain Tissue in Autism

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0946672X18302141?via%3Dihub

Aluminium in brain tissue in autism

Ivan Ivanovski, Ana Ivanovski, Dimitrije Nikolic, Petar Ivanovski

 

1. Introduction

The discovery of aluminum (Al) in quantities unexpectedly high in brain tissue in five patients with autism spectrum disorder [1] has immediately imposed to us the question: from where has this aluminum come? We live in what one leading researcher on the chemistry of aluminum has called “the Aluminum Age” [2] and concerns about the toxicity of ingested Al were expressed over hundred years ago [3] long before it became as widely used as it is today.

Al is the third most abundant element in the earth’s crust and occurs naturally in the environment, foodstuffs, and drinking water [4]. It is also used in: processed foods, materials and articles such as, Al-containing food packaging, Al foils, cooking utensils and baking trays. It has long been assumed that dietary Al is the main risk source of exposure to biologically available Al. Under physiologic conditions intestinal absorption of aluminum is impossible since biometals (Fe, Cu, Zn, Mn, Mo, Cr) and toxic metals (Pb, Hg, Ni, Cd,) are absorbed exclusively in their 2+ state. Aluminum as a trivalent under physiologic conditions cannot be absorbed. Trivalent Al can be absorbed through the intestinal mucosa only in the cases of mucosal damage (infection, inflammation, intoxication as was the case in 1988 in England [5]).

The Camelford water pollution incident [5] involved the accidental contamination of the drinking water supply to the town of Camelford, Cornwall, in July 1988, when twenty tonnes of aluminium sulphate was inadvertently added to the water supply, raising the concentration to 3000 times the admissible level. If present in the intestinal lumen while the mucosa is damaged, or is ingested in toxic quantities, Al3+ is absorbed probably by simple diffusion.

It has been suggested that acid digestion in the stomach would solubilise most of the ingested aluminum compounds. In acidic aqueous solutions with pH < 5 the aluminum ion exists mainly as Al3+, e.g. hydrated Al3+ [Al(H2O)6]3+. By passing from the stomach to the intestines the increase in pH results in the formation of complexes of aluminum with hydroxide and finally the formation of insoluble aluminum hydroxide at neutral pH. Therefore as the pH is neutralized in the duodenum the aluminum ion is gradually converted to aluminum hydroxide and the majority is then expected to precipitate in the intestine with subsequent fecal excretion, leaving only a minor fraction available for potential absorption. In conclusion, independently of the pH value Al in its compounds always retains its trivalent state. Divalent aluminum does exist. It has been detected in the gas phase after explosion of aluminized grenades in the upper atmosphere and in stellar absorption spectra [6]. Usually humans live very far from these events and spaces.

Aluminum can be potentially absorbed through the skin essentially if it is shaved or irritated by application of skin care creams, rejuvenation creams, sprays against unpleasant smells and sweats and after shave lotions that contain aluminum [7]. However, the use of these cosmetic products in newborns, infants, and children is not common. Al can be also absorbed across the lung or olfactory epithelia by persons working in workplaces where Al welding is carried out during electrolysis in Al production or in the processing industries (e.g., foundries, powder production). There are thus clearly different routes of Al exposure and what must be emphasized is that these are not necessarily equivalent with regard to the amount delivered per unit of time and more importantly with regard to the age at which the person is exposed to Al. The younger age carries greater probability for toxic effects.

Although it is commonly assumed that children obtain much more Al from diet than from vaccination [8], this notion contradicts basic toxicological principles. The route of exposure that bypasses the protective barriers of the gastrointestinal tract and/or the skin will likely require a lower dose to produce a toxic outcome [2]. In the case of Al only approximately 0.25% of dietary Al is absorbed into systemic circulation [9]. Much of the Al that enterally enters the human body is typically rapidly removed by the kidneys [10]. In contrast, Al hydroxide (the most common adjuvant form) injected intramuscularly may be absorbed at nearly 100% efficiency over time [11].
More importantly, wherever the anatomical place of vaccine application is, adjuvant Al enters into the circulation where it binds to transferrin. This adjuvant Al bound to transferrin, has a unique capacity to cross the blood-brain and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barriers, access the brain where it is deposited probably for the whole life [12] since adjuvant Al is poorly excreted [13].

Today we live in an era of aluminum. Aluminum is all around us. Therefore, one can rightly ask the question: were Mold et al. [1] aware in their research that there was no contamination with external aluminum during the acquisition of brain tissue and the procedure for determining the amount of aluminum in it? The same question can be posed to all other former researchers and to their research on the basis of which a ″Handbook on the Toxicology of Metals″ has been written [14].

In the paper of Mold et al. [1] the strangest and most intriguing fact is that the highest concentrations of aluminum were measured in the youngest person. The boy was only 15 years old (case A4). Generally accepted claim that dietary aluminum is the main source of exposure to aluminum, inevitably raises the question: how is it possible that in the course of only 15 years of life, this boy “absorbed” such amount of aluminum and deposited it in his brain? On the other hand the boy in that age probably did not use creams containing aluminum, antiperspirant sprays, nor shaved. He also could not have been present in1988 in Camelford, Cornwall (UK). At the age of 15 he could not be a worker in the aluminum industry where he would be exposed to aluminum dust and fumes. Even less it was likely that this boy lived near the place where aluminized grenades exploded! We also do not believe that the boy was a cosmonaut and he travelled in interstellar spaces where divalent aluminum is located. In the work of Mold et al. [1] the year of birth of persons shown in the work is not indicated. We can only assume that the 15-year-old boy was born around the year 2000.

Given all of the above under normal, usual, physiological conditions the most important, the most regular and most predictable even by the law legislated access of aluminum into the human body is through vaccines. According to the vaccination schedule which was established in 2000 in the USA, by the age of 18 months, approximately 4425 μg of aluminum is parenterally delivered into the human body through vaccines [15]. After 2005 with the introducing of new vaccines, the quantity of adjuvant Al has increased up to 4925 μg [15].

Aluminum neurotoxicity has been shown in experiments on mice [16]. Aluminum toxicity has been shown even in one clinical study in which 182 infants were treated with intravenous injections of nutritional formula that contained different quantities of aluminum [17] but received significantly less aluminum than the infants receiving aluminum via vaccines. Recently it was shown that another metal i.e. mercury is also neurotoxic for children even in much less quantities in comparison with aluminum [18]. Toxic effects of Al can be assigned to its physical and chemical properties. Owing to its 3+ charge Al attracts negatively charged ions and electrons but because it cannot transition to other oxidation states besides 3+, Al is not a direct component in any redox reactions but may participate indirectly in Fenton reactions. Moreover, the small ionic radius and the high charge of Al3+ are its important properties by which this metal can exert its toxic activity. The Al ion (0.054 nm) is roughly the same size as the ferric (Fe3+) ion (0.065 nm) and much smaller than magnesium (Mg; 0.072 nm) and calcium (Ca) ions (0.100 nm). Thus, in biological systems, Al can effectively replace these essential biometals in many enzymatic reactions [19,20].

2. Conclusion

Aluminum is undoubtedly neurotoxic. The main the most important “physiological” way to reach the human body is via vaccines in the form of a trivalent adjuvant. But on the other hand, vaccines have saved humanity from many deadly infectious diseases. So-called cost-benefit is in absolute overdose in favor of vaccination. One should never think about abolishing vaccination, but rather to work on finding ways to reduce the toxicity of adjuvant aluminum and if possible to completely eliminate it.

To achieve this goal, we suggest:

1

All aluminum containing vaccines must be postponed until the time when the child’s brain shows sufficient physiological maturation. That would be the day when the child loses its last primitive reflex, corresponding the age of 6–7 months, ideally, after 12 months. By this age most of so-called synaptic pruning is completed and consequently the child’s brain is probably less vulnerable to the deleterious effects of aluminum, in comparison with the brain vulnerability to the toxins given immediately after birth when the newborns on their first day of life are injected with 0.25 mg of Al3+ through the application of hepatitis B vaccine. The younger the time age of exposition to Al, carries the greater harm for Al toxicity and brain damage. This is in accordance with a recent review in which it has been calculated and shown, that the levels of aluminum suggested by the currently used limits place infants at risk of acute, repeated and possibly chronic exposures of toxic levels of aluminum in modern vaccine schedules [21]. Therefore, it has been suggested that vaccination in neonates and low birth-weight infants has to be re-assessed in the sense of aluminum dosage reduction in vaccines, according to the birth-weights. The main obstacle to this proposal is the unknown effect of this proposed reduction on the final antigenicity of the vaccine [21].

2

It is necessary to totally eliminate the metal(s) in all vaccines (especially aluminum and mercury), whether in children or in adults; it very much matters to be clear and totally intransigent, on this point. Complete elimination of vaccine aluminum neurotoxicity could be achieved by its replacement with some other element, or compound. Squalene could also be used to replace Al. In a recent review [22] it was reported that calcium phosphate could be as effective adjuvant as aluminum salts, with the following advantages: Calcium phosphate is present in the general monographic on human vaccines of the European Pharmacopoeia 8.0; calcium phosphate is classified as safe and biocompatible by the US FDA; calcium phosphate is a natural compound of the human body, thus suggesting its good tolerance for individuals; adsorption capability of calcium phosphate is equivalent to aluminum adjuvants depending on preparation mode, considered antigens, and particle size; calcium phosphate booster antigenicity is potentially better than with aluminum adjuvants [22].

Calcium phosphate was used in France until the mid-1980s mainly for the diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus vaccine group without any mention of adverse reactions by physicians. Until the early-1970s it was also successfully used in the pentavalent human vaccination (smallpox, yellow fever, measles, BCG, and tetanus) and also without any reported adverse reaction [23].

With all of this in mind it is very mysterious and curious that in the 1980s, vaccines manufacturers opted for replacing calcium phosphate, which was used as adjuvant for human vaccines with Al as preferred adjuvant. Since then most of the clinical experience has been gathered with the use of Al as vaccines adjuvant while calcium phosphate was only marginally investigated [24]. From the other side we do not insist but to our knowledge, we would like to suggest that zinc could be the element of choice to replace aluminum for the following reasons: 1. Both metals, Zn and Al are amphoteric; 2. Zinc is necessary for normal human life (zinc human body burden is between 200 and 300 mg); and finally; 3. so far, no zinc overload related disease has been described. In animal experiments zinc toxicity has been shown but normally and fortunately, humans do not live in “experimental” conditions, in which experimental animals are exposed to excessive, toxic quantities of various substances, including zinc. There are no literature data so far on the use of zinc as adjuvant. Therefore, vaccinologists and immunologists must start as soon as possible with the experiments with zinc compounds (hydroxide, sulphate or phosphate) as adjuvant. If it turns out after the experiment that zinc compound(s) have successfully replaced Al compounds as adjuvants, the amount of zinc that would be administered by vaccine in children up to 18 months of age would be about 5.000 μg ( = 5 mg), which is absolutely far beyond the domain of experimental Zn toxicity.

Naturally many scientists will not be in agreement with our arguments on the potential role of zinc in future vaccines. The fact is that we presently possess no critical perspective for zinc to be the substitution for Al, as well. Both of these statements should not at all be the arguments against our proposal for the experiments with zinc as adjuvant to find out whether zinc and its compounds could offer advantages over aluminum.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

[1]
M. Mold, D. Umar, A. King, C. ExleyAluminium in brain tissue in autism
J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol., 46 (2018), pp. 76-82
[2]
C. ExleyAluminium and medicine
A.L.R. Merce, J. Felcman, M.A.L. Recio (Eds.), Molecular and Supramolecular Bioinorganic Chemistry: Applications in Medical Science, Nova Biomedical Books., NY, USA (2009), pp. 45-68
[3]
W.J. GiesSome objections to the use of alum baking-powder
JAMA, 57 (1911), pp. 816-821
[4]
EFSA (European Food Safety Authority)Safety of aluminum from dietary intake, scientific opinion of the panel on food additives, flavourings, processing aids and food contact materials
AFC). EFSA J. (2008), pp. 1-34
[5]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camelford_water_pollution_incident; Accessed Feb 5, 2018.
[6]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminium(II)_oxide; Accessed Feb, 5 2018.
[7]
A. Pineau, O. Guillard, F. Favreau, A. Marrauld, B. FauconneauIn vitro study of percutaneous absorption of aluminum from antiperspirants through human skin in the Franz™ diffusion cell
J. Inorg. Biochem., 110 (2012), pp. 21-22
[8]
P.A. Offit, R.K. JewAddressing parents’ concernes: do vaccines contain harmful preservatives, adjuvants, additives, or residuals?
Pediatrics, 112 (6 Pt 1) (2003)
1394-137
[9]
R.A. Yokel, C.L. Hicks, R.L. FlorenceAluminum bioavailability from basic sodium aluminum phosphate, an approved food additive emulsifying agent, incorporated in cheese
Food Chem.Toxicol., 46 (2008), pp. 2261-2266
[10]
L. TomljenovicAluminum and Alzheimerꞌs disease: after a centuryof controversy, is there a plausible link?
J. Alzheimers Dis., 23 (2011), pp. 567-598
[11]
R.A. Yokel, P.J. McNamaraAluminim toxicokinetics: un updated minireview
Pharmacol. Toxicol., 88 (2001), pp. 159-167
[12]
Z. Khan, C. Combadiere, F.J. Authier, et al.Slow CCL2-dependent translocation of biopersistent particles from muscle to brain
BMC Med., 11 (2013), p. 99
[13]
S.L. HemElimination of aluminium adjuvants
Vaccine, 20 (Suppl. 3) (2002), pp. S40-3
[14]
B. Sjögren, A. Iregren, J. Montelius, R.A. YokelAluminium
G.F. Nordberg, B.A. Fowler, M. Nordberg (Eds.), Handbook on the Toxicology of Metals (4th ed), Elsevier/Academic Press (2015)
Chapter 26.
[15]
N.Z. MillerAluminium in childhood vaccines is unsafe
J. Am. Phys. Surg., 21 (2016), pp. 109-117
[16]
G. Crépeaux, H. Eidi, M.-O. David, Y. Baba-Amer, E. Tzavara, B. Giros, F.-J. Authier, C. Exley, C.A. Shaw, J. Cadusseau, R.K. GherardiNon-linear dose-response of aluminium hydroxyde adjuvant particles : selective low dose neurotoxicity
Toxicology, 375 (2017), pp. 48-75
[17]
N.J. Bishop, R. Morley, J.P. Day, A. LucasAluminium neurotoxicity in preterm infants receiving intravenous feeding solutions
N. Engl. J. Med., 336 (1997), pp. 1557-1561
[18]
I. Prpić, A. Milardović, I. Vlašić-Cicvarić, Z. Špiric, J. Radić Nišević, P. Vukelić, J. Snoj Tratnik, D. Mazej, M. HorvatPrenatal exposure to low-level methylmercury alters the child’s fine motor skills at the age of 18 months
Environ. Res., 152 (2017), pp. 369-374
[19]
T.J. Shafer, W.R. MundyEffect of aluminum on neuronal signal transduction: mechanisms underlying disruption of phosphoinositide hydrolysis
Gen. Pharmacol., 26 (1995), pp. 889-895
[20]
W.R. Mundy, P.R. Kodavanti, V.F. Dulchinos, H.A. TilsonAluminum alerts calcium transport in plasma membrane and endoplasmic reticulum from rat brain
J. Biochem. Toxicol., 9 (1994), pp. 17-23
[21]
J. Lyons-Weiler, R. RicketsonReconsideration of the immunotherapeutic pediatric safe dose levels of aluminum
J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol., 48 (2018), pp. 67-73
[22]
J.D. Masson, M. Thibaudon, L. Bélec, G. CrépeauxCalcium phosphate: a substitute for aluminum adjuvants?
Expert Rev. Vaccines, 16 (3) (2017), pp. 289-299
[23]
C. Gateff, E.H. Relyveld, G. Le Gonidec, et al.Study of a new pentavalent vaccine combination
Ann. Microbiol. (Paris), 124 (1973), pp. 387-409
[24]
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getAllAnswers.do?reference=E-2017-001984&language=EN; Accessed Feb 5, 2018.

 

———————————————————————–

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/09/21/aluminum-flawed-assumptions-fueling-autoimmune-disease-and-lyme/

 

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/11/28/biological-mechanisms-of-vaccine-injury/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/08/21/aluminum-in-the-brain-in-multiple-sclerosis-regulatory-and-funding-agencies-silent-complicit/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/10/16/altering-human-genetics-through-vaccination/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/03/30/ty-bollinger-the-truth-about-vaccines-series/  I highlight a 9 part series on vaccines.  

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/09/08/acip-vote-yes-for-new-vaccine-despite-no-safety-studies-on-cumulative-effect-with-other-vaccines/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/08/24/financial-kickbacks-for-vaccinations-abusive-illegal-fraudulent/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/10/05/drug-companies-pay-fda-nih-to-fast-track-market-vaccines/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/04/06/video-how-vaccines-are-made/

Autism and metals:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2016/12/08/mercury-and-autism/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/09/28/toxic-metal-pollution-linked-with-development-of-autism-spectrum-disorder/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/09/19/autism-aluminum-adjuvant-link-corroborated/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/06/15/canadian-data-more-autism-where-vaccine-coverage-is-highest/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/06/01/immunoexcitotoxicity-as-the-central-mechanism-of-etiopathology-treatment-of-autism-spectrum-disorders-a-possible-role-of-fluoride-aluminum/

Vaccine fraud:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/07/20/hhs-vaccine-fraud-proven/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/03/21/congress-receives-vaccine-safety-project-details-since-the-cdc-fda-ignore-their-own-data-and-proclaim-vaccines-do-not-cause-autism/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/10/08/vaccine-safety-efficacy-studies-that-are-the-bases-for-marketing-authorizations-are-a-complete-methodological-mess/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2016/11/29/spider-attacks-cdc/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/09/27/strange-case-of-poul-thorsen-vaccine-data-manipulator-extraordinaire/

Also, https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/03/30/ty-bollinger-the-truth-about-vaccines-series/ , this link shows highlights of a 9 part series by Dr. Gentempo and it’s riddled with vaccine fraud everywhere.  There are links within the article on specific vaccines.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Woman Undergoes Extensive Arm Surgery After Flu Shot

https://www.healthnutnews.com/cbs-woman-undergoes-extensive-arm-surgery-after-flu-shot-after-a-must-read/

CBS: Woman undergoes extensive arm surgery after flu shot (A must read)

UPDATE: We were contacted by Jacalyn and she was very sweet. We also wanted you all to know that she’s a yoga and fitness instructor, so you can imagine what this injury has done to her livelihood as well as her body!)

 

In 2017, Jacalyn Broze got her flu shot just like she always did. However, that year the Twin Cities woman knew something was wrong within 24 hours. And after visiting the doctor she got the diagnosis: SIRVA, or “Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration,” which can happen when a shot is injected too high or too deep into the shoulder.

With extreme pain in her shoulder, she questioned the grocery pharmacy where she got the shot and he told her it could be normal temporary soreness. However, weeks later,

“her chiropractor noticed her right shoulder and arm were sloping.”

She had to see several doctors before an MRI revealed that “…everything had fallen off. A complete tear of the rotator cuff.” 1

Dr. Elliot Francke, a physician specializing in infectious diseases for 40 years, says he has never seen the condition, claiming it is extremely rare (gee, that’s reassuring).

Jacalyn Broze had surgery and is working her way back to health. Considering the shot is barely 10% effective and can cause permanent paralysis (right on the insert), we don’t do it at all. Ever. This story is just another reason why it’s not worth it.

 ____________________

Listen to Dr. Suzanne Humphries on what the Flu Shot Really Does to You:
  • In 4 minutes we learn there are “primary non-responders” to each and every vaccine, making them susceptible to the very diseases they are vaccinating for.  Getting vaccinated gives people a false sense of security.  Even IF they work initially there’s no guarantee it has staying power.
  • 2:00 The more pertussis vaccines a person gets over their lifetime, the shorter duration of time they actually respond to the vaccinations.  An adult’s protection might last 6 months to 2 years, whereas a child who keeps getting vaccinated for it has less protection.
  • 2:30 Regarding the influenza vaccine, effectiveness is ONLY for the year it’s given and even that is quite low.  The following year may present new strains and literature shows that if are vaccinated with the flu vaccine in year one, your risk in year two for contracting the flu is much higher, particularly a pandemic strain, as well as your risk of shedding and spreading influenza the flu is higher.  It changes your immune system so your T-cells can’t use memory response making you more susceptible to the flu than a person who has never been vaccinated.
Need more about information surrounding the Flu vaccine?

 Approx. 7:30 Min

Dr. Mercola clarifies the stats on “flu deaths.”  While authorities tout that 35,000 people DIE of the flu, the actual number is less than 1,000.  Most of the 35,000 do not die from the flu but rather pneumonia.  The flu vaccine does not work against pneumonia at all and hardly works at all for the actual flu.

Toxins in some of the flu shots:  https://www.revolutionhealth.org/all-you-need-to-know-about-the-flu-shot/

  • Thimerosol –  >25mcg of mercury per dose, which is 250 times higher than the safe limit set by the EPA
  • Aluminum – a neurotoxin that has been linked to Alzheimer’s disease
  • Triton X-100 – a detergent
  • Phenol – carbolic acid
  • Ethylene glycol – antifreeze
  • Betapropiolactone – a disinfectant
  • Nonoxynol – used to kill or stop growth of STDs
  • Octoxinol 9 – a vaginal spermicide
  • Sodium phosphate

Screenshot_2018-10-21 flu-shot-effective-package-insert-2011-2012-formula gif (GIF Image, 910 × 453 pixels)

Package insert

It states, right there in the package, that it has NOT been proven to be effective.

“There have been no controlled trials adequately demonstrating a decrease in influenza after vaccination with FLULAVAL.”  “Safety and effectiveness have not been established in pregnant women, nursing mothers, or children.”  “Antibody responses were lower in geriatric subjects than in younger subjects.”  “Immunosuppressed persons may have a reduced immune response to FLULAVAL.”  

Despite the poor results of the vaccine, authorities continue to recommend it for everyone – even infants (6 months).

Sources and References

Erin Elizabeth is a long time activist with a passion for the healing arts, working in that arena for a quarter century. Her site HealthNutNews.com is barely 4 years old, but cracked the top 20 Natural Health sites worldwide. She is an author, public speaker, and has recently done some TV and film programs for some of her original work which have attracted international media coverage. Erin was the recipient for the Doctors Who Rock “Truth in Journalism award for 2017. You can get Erin’s free e-book here and also watch a short documentary on how she overcame vaccine injuries, Lyme disease, significant weight gain, and more. Follow Erin on FacebookTwitter, and Instagram.P.S. You can subscribe to her Youtube Channel for breaking news, television appearances and more.

Rise in Acute Flaccid Myelitis Cases and the Link To Vaccinations

Polio-Like Condition May Be On The Rise In U.S. | NBC Nightly News

NBC News

Published on Oct 8, 2018
Health officials are on alert for cases of Acute Flaccid Myelitis, a rare complication linked to a common virus. Symptoms can include sudden limb weakness, drooping eyelids or face, trouble swallowing, and slurred speech.
Within a week, Quentin Hill went from being an active seven-year-old to a hospital bed. Diagnosed with a rare polio-like illness that at least five other kids in Minnesota now also have.
Doctors are telling you this is something we don’t know much about so there’s no known cure. 
https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2016/11/07/connection-of-acute-flaccid-myelitis-and-vaccinations/  The connection between vaccination and paralysis has been known since the 40’s and 50’s and was written about in The Lancet by Stephen Mawdsley in an article titled, “Polio Provocation: Solving a Mystery With the Help of History.” Mawdsley states:
“The application of epidemiological surveillance and statistical methods enabled researchers to trace the steady rise in polio incidence along with the expansion of immunization programs for diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus. A report that emerged from Guy’s and Evelina Hospitals, London, in 1950, found that 17 cases of polio paralysis developed in the limb injected with pertussis or tetanus inoculations. Results published by Australian doctor Bertram McCloskey also showed a strong association between injections and polio paralysis. Meanwhile, in the USA, public health researchers in New York and Pennsylvania reached similar conclusions.Clinical evidence, derived from across three continents, had established a theory that required attention.”
So what happened to this theory that piercing the skin during injection drives the polio virus into deep tissue where it then enters the central nervous system where it ultimately leads to paralysis and even death?
Good question.
The theory was essentially proven in 1998 in an article titled, “Mechanism of Injury-Provoked Poliomyelitis,” in the Journal of Virology. Researchers state:
“Skeletal muscle injury is known to predispose its sufferers to neurological complications of concurrent poliovirus infections. This phenomenon, labeled ‘provocation poliomyelitis,’ continues to cause numerous cases of childhood paralysis due to the administration of unnecessary injections to children in areas where poliovirus is endemic. Recently, it has been reported that intramuscular injections may also increase the likelihood of vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis in recipients of live attenuated poliovirus vaccines. We have studied this important risk factor for paralytic polio in an animal system for poliomyelitis and have determined the pathogenic mechanism linking intramuscular injections and provocation poliomyelitis.Skeletal muscle injury induces retrograde axonal transport of poliovirus and thereby facilitates viral invasion of the central nervous system and the progression of spinal cord damage. The pathogenic mechanism of provocation poliomyelitis may differ from that of polio acquired in the absence of predisposing factors.”
The virus associated with the recent hospitalizations is Enterovirus D68, which is not polio per se, but is very similar and is in the same family of enteroviruses. Doctor Alan S. Cunningham, MD, a retired pediatrician wrote about his fear of the possibility of provocation of a polio-like virus due to vaccination in The BMJ in 2015:
“Since August 2, 2014, our Centers for Disease Control has received reports of 107 cases of ‘acute flaccid myelitis’ (AFM), a polio-like illness in children in 34 states. During the same interval there have been 1153 cases of respiratory illnesses associated with enterovirus D-68 (CIDRAP News 1/16/15. CDC update 1/15/15. Catherine Saint Louis, NY Times 1/13/15). AFM affects motor neurons in spinal cord gray matter, resulting in asymmetrical limb weakness; 34% of patients have cranial nerve motor dysfunction. Median age of patients is 7.6 years/range: 5 months-20 years (MMWR 63: 1243–January 9, 2015). So far only one child has fully recovered. EV-D68 is a suspected cause but, thus far, no viruses have been found in the spinal fluid of patients, and only a minority have had an antecedent illness associated with EV-D68. Case-control studies are planned to look for clues, but presently AFM is a mystery disease of unknown cause. It is taboo to suggest a role for vaccines, but some old-timers remember “provocation poliomyelitis” or “provocation paralysis.” This is paralytic polio following intramuscular injections, typically with vaccines. PP was most convincingly documented by Austin Bradford Hill and J. Knowelden during the 1949 British polio epidemic when the risk of paralytic polio was increased 20-fold among children who had received the DPT injection (BMJ 2:1–July 1, 1950). Similar observations were made by Greenberg and colleagues in New York City; their literature review cited suspected cases as far back as 1921 (Am J Public Health 42:142–Feb.1952). I first became aware of PP 10 years ago while browsing through “Krugman’s Infectious Disease of Children” (page 128 of the 2004 edition). AFM may result from a direct virus attack on the spinal cord, or by an immune attack triggered by a virus, or by something else.If a polio-like virus is circulating in the U.S., the possibility of its provocation by one or more vaccines has to be considered.”
Polio provocation resurfaced in the 80’s when vaccination programs in developing countries increased in tandem with more children becoming paralyzed.

The US government chose to continue vaccinating and stated,
“any possible doubts, whether or not well founded, about the safety of the vaccine cannot be allowed to exist in view of the need to assure that the vaccine will continue to be used to the maximum extent consistent with the nation’s public health objectives.”
This is important information to consider for MSIDS patients, since our immune systems are compromised and viruses often play a role in our illness, we need to consider the very probable connection with provoked viruses by vaccines along with our other tick borne infections.
For more information on vaccines, please read: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2015/06/19/a-word-on-vaccines/
https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2015/08/12/connecting-dots-mycoplasma/ Written by the Office of Medical and Scientific Justice and substantiating this further: http://www.whale.to/vaccine/cantwell2.html “One factor common to all the troops is that they were given experimental and potentially dangerous drugs and vaccines employed to protect them against Iraqi chemical and biowarfare agents. As early as December 1990, there were warnings about using our servicemen as medical guinea pigs. In an unprecedented legal decision, the FDA allowed the Pentagon to give unapproved drugs and vaccines without requiring consent of the soldiers. Claiming security reasons, the Pentagon also refused to identify the types or the number of drugs and injections they forced the troops to take… Soldiers who rejected the injections were given them forcibly. Physicians who refused to cooperate with the military’s experimental vaccine program were treated harshly.”

FDA Official Uses Revolving Door to Join BioTech Company Developing mRNA Vaccines

**Update, July 2023**

Top FDA officials are in a revolving door and zigzag between the FDA and Big Pharma.  The fact former White House Coronavirus Task Force Advisor Deborah Birx has now become the CEO of Armata Pharmaceuticals is a perfect example.  The California-based pharmaceutical company said it is currently “developing and advancing a broad pipeline of natural and synthetic phage candidates.  But what’s really interesting is that in October 2022, Birx was named a member of the Federal Advisory Board for Palantir – a software company specializing in data analytics and data integration.  TechCrunch previously reported, “As of 2013, Palantir was used by at least 12 groups within the US Government including the CIA, DHS, NSA, FBI, the CDC, the Marine Corps, the Air Force, Special Operations Command, West Point, the Joint IED-defeat organization and Allies, the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board and the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.”

https://thevaccinereaction.org/2018/10/fda-official-uses-revolving-door-to-join-biotech-company-developing-mrna-vaccines/

FDA Official Uses Revolving Door to Join BioTech Company Developing mRNA Vaccines

FDA Official Uses Revolving Door to Join BioTech Company Developing mRNA Vaccines

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) official Wellington Sun, MD has been hired by biotechnology company Moderna Therapeutics, Inc. of Cambridge, MA to head its Vaccine Strategy and Regulatory Affairs division. Dr. Sun was director of the Division of Vaccines and Related Product Applications at the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) where he worked on infectious disease policy, including efforts to respond to the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic and the 2014-2016 Ebola and 2015-2016 Zika virus outbreaks.1 2

“I am excited to work with the team here to identify new development candidates while progressing the portfolio of existing clinical programs,” said Sun.2

Prior to his 10-year career at the FDA in which he facilitated the approvals of 28 new vaccine applications in infectious diseases and over 100 applications for new vaccine indications, Sun worked at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) where he led research on Dengue fever and West Nile virus. Before that, Sun was a clinician and vaccine researcher for 27 years at the U.S. Army Medical Corps.1 2

According to Moderna’s Chief Medical Officer Tal Zaks, MD, to whom Sun will report, Sun is “uniquely qualified to shape” his company’s development strategy.1

Moderna is poised to become a major player on the vaccine development front. Currently focusing on a brand new class of treatments called messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines and therapeutics, the company is working to develop new vaccines against a wide range of diseases including cancer, influenza, Zika and Chikungunya, among others.1 2

The central molecule of all forms of life involved in almost all aspects of cell biology, mRNA has been used as a method to deliver genetic information, particularly with mRNA based cancer immunotherapies.3 Scientists have been developing synthetic mRNA that is engineered to resemble mature and processed mRNA molecules not only to create new cancer immunotherapies but also to create new infectious disease vaccines.4

Vaccines using mRNA technology differ from traditional vaccines because they act as a “set of instructions that direct the body to fight or prevent disease.” Immunotherapeutic medicines and mRNA messenger vaccines are being designed to “direct the body’s cells to produce intracellular or secreted proteins” by scientists who believe the mRNA mechanism of action can be engineered to prevent or treat infectious diseases, cancer, cardiovascular and rare diseases.2

However, no new technology comes without the potential for unknown risks, especially one that involves genetic engineering. As one group of mRNA vaccine developers pointed out,

“Historically, the prospect of developing mRNA vaccines was uncertain due to concerns of mRNA instability and the feasibility of large-scale manufacturing.”5

The production of pharmaceutical products using the new mRNA technology is responsible for the Moderna’s current $7 billion valuation. The company is also in “strategic relationships” with such pharmaceutical giants as Merck, AstraZeneca and Vertex, as well as agencies under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Defense, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Moderna recently opened a major manufacturing plant specifically for its mRNA product development programs.1 2


References:

1 Sagonowsky E. Moderna picks up FDA vaccine official Wellington Sun. FiercePharma Sept. 6, 2018.
2 Press Release. Dr. Wellington Sun Joins Moderna as Head, Vaccine Strategy and Regulatory Affairs. Moderna Therapeutics Sept. 5, 2018.
3 Weissman D. mRNA transcript therapy. Exp Rev Vaccines 2015; 14(2): 265-281.
4 Sahm U, Kanko K, Tureci O. mRNA-based therapeutics – developing a new class of drugs. Nature Review Drug Discovery 2014; 13: 759-780.
5 Brito LA, Kommareddy S et al. Chapter Seven – Self-Amplifying mRNA Vaccines. Advances in Genetics 2015; 89: 179-233.

__________________

**Comment**

Those entrusted with public health should not be allowed to have conflicts of interest.  This revolving door thing as well as financial kickbacks to doctors for pushing vaccines must stop.  These policies are endangering patients & the collusion is very real.

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/10/18/lawfirm-announces-101-million-measles-vaccine-settlement-for-infant-that-suffered-brain-injury/  In this article we learn the U.S. government has a huge conflict of interest, as it profits from the sale of vaccines, and Gardasil in particular.  The U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) is tasked with vaccine safety, and yet it is also the largest purchaser of vaccines, spending over $4 billion annually to purchase vaccines.

Julie Gerberding was in charge of the CDC from 2002 to 2009, which includes the years the FDA approved the Merck Gardasil vaccine.  Soon after she took over the CDC, she reportedly completely overhauled the agency’s organizational structure, and many of the CDC’s senior scientists and leaders either left or announced plans to leave. Some have claimed that almost all of the replacements Julie Gerberding appointed had ties to the vaccine industry.  Gerberding resigned from the CDC on January 20, 2009, and took over as the president of Merck’s Vaccine division, a 5 billion dollar-a-year operation, and the supplier of the largest number of vaccines the CDC recommends.

Gerberding, now the executive vice president of pharmaceutical giant, Merck, sold 38,368 of her shares in Merck stock for $2,340,064.32. She still holds 31,985 shares of the company’s stock, valued at about $2 million.

The National Institute of Health also holds patents on vaccines, such as Gardasil, and earns royalties from the sale of vaccines.  Dr. Eric Suba tried to use the Freedom of Information Act to find out how much money the National Institute of Health (NIH) earned from the sale of Gardasil, but they refused to report the amount of revenue the government earns from this vaccine (although not denying they do earn royalties).

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/08/24/financial-kickbacks-for-vaccinations-abusive-illegal-fraudulent/  Health insurance documents reveal Blue Cross Blue Shield gives kickbacks to pediatricians who push vaccines to the tune of 40-80 thousand dollars a year per doctor.

Secondly, this post explains the danger of altering human genetics through vaccinations:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/10/16/altering-human-genetics-through-vaccination/

Lawfirm Announces $101 Million Measles Vaccine Settlement for Infant that Suffered Brain Injury

Lawfirm Announces $101 Million Measles Vaccine Settlement for Infant that Suffered Brain Injury

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

The lawfirm of Maglio Christopher & Toale, P.A. announced earlier this month (July, 2018) that they had negotiated a $101 million dollar settlement for an infant who suffered a severe reaction to the Measles Mumps Rubella (MMR) vaccine.

O.R. was a one-year-old healthy baby girl who was already walking and climbing. On February 13, 2013, she received vaccinations for Measles Mumps Rubella (MMR), Hepatitis A, Haemophilus Influenzae type B (Hib), Prevnar (pneumonia), and Varicella (chickenpox).

That evening, the mother noticed baby O.R. was irritable and feverish.

After a call to the pediatrician, the doctor advised Mom to give her Tylenol and Benadryl. The fever continued for several days and on the evening before the baby’s scheduled pediatrician visit, O.R. began having severe seizures.

She was rushed to the emergency room. Baby O.R. went into cardiac and respiratory arrest and doctors placed her on a ventilator.

The seizures and cardiac arrest left O.R. with a severe brain injury, encephalopathy, cortical vision impairment, truncal hypotonia (low muscle tone), and kidney failure.

After months of treatment at the hospital, baby O.R. finally went home, but her disabilities require specialized medical care and supervision around the clock for the rest of her life.

The $101 million-dollar settlement will pay for the child’s constant high-level medical care for the rest of her life. The family received a lump sum of $1 million dollars to cover the immediate costs of medical bills and expenses. The rest will be paid out through an annuity over the child’s lifetime.

Source:

$101 Million Dollar Vaccine Injury Award for Encephalopathy from MMR Vaccine

Injuries and Deaths Due to Vaccines Are a Real Risk, but Censored from the Public

cover slide doj vaccine injuries deaths litigated

The U.S. Government and Big Pharma, the main purchaser of advertising space in the corporate-sponsored “mainstream” media, consistently tells the public that vaccines are “safe and effective,” and that anyone who dares to say otherwise, including honest medical doctors, are quacks or uneducated.

However, the fact that vaccines kill and injure people, including young babies and infants, is not a fact that is in dispute. The only question that is in dispute is how many lives are being destroyed by vaccines? No one really knows.

The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) was started as a result of a law passed in 1986 that gave pharmaceutical companies total legal immunity from being sued due to injuries and deaths resulting from vaccines.

There were so many lawsuits filed against Big Pharma for vaccine injuries and deaths, that the pharmaceutical companies basically blackmailed Congress by stating that they would stop manufacturing vaccines unless they had legal protection.

Congress obliged and passed the NVICP bill which then President Ronald Reagan signed into law.

Certain aspects on the Constitutionality of this law have been challenged in court, but so far the law has been upheld, with the Supreme Court ruling that vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe.”

So, even though your doctor may try to assure you that the vaccine they are about to give you or your child is “safe,” be aware that the doctor is either being dishonest to meet a quota of patients that need to be vaccinated for certain financial benefits, or the doctor is woefully ignorant and only knows what was spoon-fed him/her in medical school and sponsored by Big Pharma regarding vaccines.

The truly effective doctors do their own research and seek what is best for their patients. (One doctor in Germany, for example, has investigated measles and claims no measles virus actually exists: German Supreme Court Upholds Biologist’s Claim that Measles Virus Does Not Exist.)

The Deadly Measles Vaccine – More Die from the Vaccine than From Measles

deaths_in_the_us_during_the_past_10_years_due_to_measles

In 2015, the Big Pharma-sponsored “mainstream” media covered a very one-sided story about a measles outbreak at Disneyland in California. The corporate media blamed the outbreak (from which no one died) on unvaccinated children, a claim that was not borne out by the facts (many who contracted measles were fully vaccinated, for example.)

But this event was used as a catalyst to change vaccination laws and policies all across the U.S. in favor of mandatory vaccines. In California, a law was passed to remove the philosophical and religious exemptions to childhood vaccines.

Absent from the corporate media and U.S. Government health officials’ unified message in favor of mandatory vaccines to protect against measles outbreaks were cold, hard facts showing how dangerous the measles vaccine really is.

The measles vaccine is not available as a single vaccine in the U.S. but only as part of the 3-vaccine combo of MMR (mumps, measles, rubella).

I wrote an article back in 2015 to warn the public and expose the facts that were absent from the corporate-sponsored “mainstream” media, clearly showing that the measles vaccine was far more dangerous than measles itself, known historically as a non-fatal common childhood infection.

The article went viral and was read by millions of people, and many in the corporate media tried to vilify Health Impact News. See:

ZERO U.S. Measles Deaths in 10 Years, but Over 100 Measles Vaccine Deaths Reported

MMR Vaccine Manufacturer Merck: Surrounded by Corruption

merck-mesasles-sales

After the 2015 corporate media-manufactured Disneyland measles scare, sales in Merck’s MMR vaccine soared.

CDC-vaccine-Fraud-study-2-1

The corporate-sponsored “mainstream” media completely ignored all the corruption surrounding Merck and the U.S. CDC in regards to the MMR vaccine.

One the biggest stories of the century, which the mainstream media did not cover the year before in 2014, was the story of Dr. William Thompson, a senior epidemiologist at the CDC who co-authored and published research on the MMR vaccine for the CDC back in 2004, and his decision to become a whistleblower and reveal data that was concealed by the CDC linking the MMR vaccine to autism among African American boys.

His telephone conversations with Dr. Brian Hooker were recorded and released to the public:

Merck Vaccine Fraud image concept

In a lawsuit against Merck that was originally filed in 2010, and continues to this day, Stephen Krahling and Joan Wlochowski, former Merck virologists, claim that they

“witnessed firsthand the improper testing and data falsification in which Merck engaged to artificially inflate the (MMR) vaccine’s efficacy findings.”

The former Merck scientists claim that Merck’s faulty MMR vaccine has caused the United States to pay “hundreds of millions of dollars for a vaccine that does not provide adequate immunization.”

“As the largest single purchaser of childhood vaccines (accounting for more than 50 percent of all vaccine purchases), the United States is by far the largest financial victim of Merck’s fraud,” according to the 2010 False Claims Act complaint.

“But the ultimate victims here are the millions of children who every year are being injected with a mumps vaccine that is not providing them with an adequate level of protection.

And while this is a disease that, according to the Centers for Disease Control (‘CDC’), was supposed to be eradicated by now, the failure in Merck’s vaccine has allowed this disease to linger, with significant outbreaks continuing to occur.” (Source.)

Merck has tried, unsuccessfully, to end this case for almost eight years now, in an attempt to hide it from the American public.

In 2012, they tried to get the case dismissed. The story did garner some mainstream news coverage back in 2012. Here is a report Forbes wrote on it back in 2012. Some quotes:

Anyone who falls on either side of the debate about vaccines’ alleged potential to cause harm is sure to have heard the big news this week — the unsealing of a whistleblower suit against Merck, filed back in 2010 by two former employees accusing the drugmaker of overstating the effectiveness of its mumps, measles, and rubella vaccine.

The scientists claim Merck defrauded the U.S. government by causing it to purchase an estimated four million doses of mislabeled and misbranded MMR vaccine per year for at least a decade, and helped ignite two recent mumps outbreaks that the allegedly ineffective vaccine was intended to prevent in the first place.

The Wall Street Journal also covered the story back in 2012, but according to a report by Dr. Mercola, the Wall Street Journal’s “elite” network of CFOs from the world’s top corporations met three days later (including executives from Merck), and the story was removed from their website.

On September 4, 2014, Judge Jones ruled that the case should proceed based on merit. (Source.)

Still trying to keep this case out of the eye of the public, Merck attorneys did not give up in their attempts to keep this out of the courts and the eye of the public. They filed a motion for “Summary Judgment,” but on October 27, 2017, the court granted the whistle-blowers their “Motion to Stay,” so that the case would proceed.

There are, as of the date of publication of this article, 165 entries into the court docket for this case during an eight year period, as the attorneys for Merck do their best to stall and try to end it. (Source.)

The significance of this case, of course, is enormous, beyond measure, as it does NOT primarily deal with the issue of vaccine safety, something the U.S. Government concedes with the federal vaccine court, which has paid out billions of dollars in compensation (see quarterly reports from the DOJ here), but with the efficacy of the MMR vaccine.

If the vaccine does not even work as advertised, then why is part of the CDC-recommended childhood vaccination schedule?

gardasil_collage-3

Merck’s MMR vaccine is not the only vaccine surrounded by controversy and charges of corruption.

Merck also manufactures the HPV vaccine Gardasil, which is facing lawsuits world-wide, outside the U.S., in countries where it is still legal to sue pharmaceutical companies for vaccine injuries and deaths.

Negative press regarding the Gardasil HPV vaccine and Merck’s legal problems can be found in FranceSpainJapanIrelandDenmark, the UKIndia, and many others.

In France, Dr. Dalbergue, a former pharmaceutical industry physician with Gardasil manufacturer, Merck, has stated :

I predict that Gardasil will become the greatest medical scandal of all times because at some point in time, the evidence will add up to prove that this vaccine, technical and scientific feat that it may be, has absolutely no effect on cervical cancer and that all the very many adverse effects which destroy lives and even kill, serve no other purpose than to generate profit for the manufacturers. (Source.)

Julie-Gerberding

When discussing Merck vaccine fraud, it must also be mentioned that the U.S. government has a huge conflict of interest, as it profits from the sale of vaccines, and Gardasil in particular.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) is tasked with vaccine safety, and yet it is also the largest purchaser of vaccines, spending over $4 billion annually to purchase vaccines.

Julie Gerberding was in charge of the CDC from 2002 to 2009, which includes the years the FDA approved the Merck Gardasil vaccine.

Soon after she took over the CDC, she reportedly completely overhauled the agency’s organizational structure, and many of the CDC’s senior scientists and leaders either left or announced plans to leave. Some have claimed that almost all of the replacements Julie Gerberding appointed had ties to the vaccine industry.

Gerberding resigned from the CDC on January 20, 2009, and took over as the president of Merck’s Vaccine division, a 5 billion dollar-a-year operation, and the supplier of the largest number of vaccines the CDC recommends (article here).

It was reported in 2015 that Dr. Gerberding, now the executive vice president of pharmaceutical giant, Merck, sold 38,368 of her shares in Merck stock for $2,340,064.32. She still holds 31,985 shares of the company’s stock, valued at about $2 million.

Besides examples like this, showing a clear conflict of interest between government agencies tasked with overseeing public health and vaccine safety and pharmaceutical companies, the National Institute of Health also holds patents on vaccines, such as Gardasil, and earns royalties from the sale of vaccines.

Dr. Eric Suba tried to use the Freedom of Information Act to find out how much money the National Institute of Health (NIH) earned from the sale of Gardasil, but they refused to report the amount of revenue the government earns from this vaccine (although not denying they do earn royalties).

Conclusion: Don’t Trust Your Doctor or Big Pharma Controlled Media for Vaccine Safety Information

the-vaccine-court

Vaccines are NOT safe, and it is not even certain that they are “effective.” Just how many people are injured and killed by vaccines is not known.

The federal government Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines (ACCV) under the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services meets every quarter, and the Department of Justice (DOJ) supplies a report each quarter on cases settled for vaccine injuries and deaths as mandated by the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP).

As far as I know, Health Impact News is the only news organization publishing these quarterly reports, and you can access them here.

In November of 2014, the Government Accounting Office (GAO) issued the first report on America’s “Vaccine Court,” known as the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP), in almost 15 years.

The November 2014 GAO report criticized the government for not making the public more aware that the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program exists, and that there are funds available for vaccine injuries. Therefore, the settlements represented by vaccine injuries and deaths included in the DOJ report probably represent a small fraction of the actual vaccine injuries and deaths occurring in America today.

The U.S. government keeps a database of reports documenting vaccine injuries and deaths called The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

The problem is that very few medical officials ever report vaccine injuries or deaths, either because they are not trained to recognize them, or due to pressure within their profession to not report them. To admit that vaccines do cause harm is professional suicide for most doctors and medical professionals.

Hence, the quarterly DOJ report on vaccine cases only represents a tiny fraction of the actual cases that exist.

So please, do your own research on vaccine risks and benefits BEFORE you decide to vaccinate, or you too may soon find yourself or your children as numbered among the vaccine-damaged or vaccine-killed population.

________________

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/06/21/u-s-government-continues-to-pay-millions-in-vaccine-injuries-death-settlements/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/10/05/drug-companies-pay-fda-nih-to-fast-track-market-vaccines/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/04/06/cdcs-troubling-lack-of-research-ethics/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2016/11/29/spider-attacks-cdc/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/09/27/strange-case-of-poul-thorsen-vaccine-data-manipulator-extraordinaire/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/08/11/police-raid-scientists-who-discovered-new-vaccine-dangers/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/08/24/financial-kickbacks-for-vaccinations-abusive-illegal-fraudulent/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/03/30/ty-bollinger-the-truth-about-vaccines-series/ (Within this link are 9 links you can click for specific vaccines. I give a short blurb on each but click into the links for more)