Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

White House Keeps Ties to WHO Flu System, CA Joins WHO Global Outbreak Network & Study Shows Most People Have Immune Defenses Against H5N1

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/trump-admin-keeps-ties-to-who-influenza?

Trump Admin Keeps Ties to WHO Influenza System as U.S. Funds Bird Flu Gain-of-Function and Mass Vaccine Programs

Despite claiming to have withdrawn from the international organization.

Despite claiming to have formally withdrawn from the World Health Organization (WHO), the Trump administration has confirmed it is still in active discussions with the agency about participating in next year’s global influenza vaccine strain-selection process—at the same time the U.S. government is funding influenza bird flu gain-of-function research and a $500 million influenza vaccine initiative.

On January 22, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced that the United States had completed its withdrawal from the WHO, apparently ending all funding, recalling U.S. personnel, and terminating participation in WHO committees, governance bodies, and technical working groups.

During the same briefing, administration officials acknowledged that influenza remains an open channel for engagement.

Per CNN’s Thursday report:

“HHS left the door open to some continued collaboration, however. Asked if the US would participate in an upcoming WHO-led meeting to decide the composition of next year’s flu vaccines, the administration said conversations about that are still ongoing.”

The statement was made during a call with reporters following the withdrawal announcement.

This places influenza in a separate policy category—one where U.S. withdrawal exists on paper, but coordination with the same international decision system continues.

It raises questions about who is actually setting U.S. influenza policy, and why the one disease tied to global strain forecasting, pandemic modeling, and mass countermeasure production remains exempt from the break. (See link for article)

Important quote:

….despite the publicized WHO withdrawal, the United States remains functionally embedded in the WHO-centered influenza system—where global strain selection, federally funded virus engineering, and government-backed vaccine platforms converge inside the same international pandemic planning architecture.

And more bad news….

California Becomes First State to Join WHO’s Global Outbreak Response Network After US Exit

Important excerpt:

Newsom, who confirmed in October that he’s considering a 2028 presidential bid, revealed the new collaboration after meeting with WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus at the World Economic Forum in Switzerland.

It will be interesting to learn where California’s money to fund this ‘network,’ comes from since $111 MILLION in U.S. mandatory annual dues and $570 MILLION in “voluntary contributions” has come to an end.

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/most-people-already-have-immune-defenses?

Most People Already Have Immune Defenses Against H5N1 Bird Flu: Journal ‘Immunity’

94% had H5 antibodies, 100% showed neutralization despite no exposure to virus.

A new peer-reviewed study published last week in the journal Immunity reports that the vast majority of people already carry antibodies capable of neutralizing the cattle-linked purported H5N1 bird flu virus, despite having no known exposure to H5N1 and being classified as immunologically naïve.

The findings challenge the widespread assumption that humans are broadly unprotected against H5N1—an assumption that has underpinned recent pandemic warnings tied to the virus’s spread in U.S. dairy cattle.

It also challenges the justification for government-led gain-of-function bird flu experiments and mass vaccine development programs built on the premise that humans have little to no existing immunity, including the Trump administration’s $500 million “next-generation, gold-standard” bird flu vaccine effort.

Study Finds Antibodies in Nearly All Unexposed Individuals

Researchers analyzed blood samples from 66 individuals in Germany with no known exposure to H5N1.

Using multiple laboratory tests, the study found that 94% had detectable IgG antibodies that bind to the H5 hemagglutinin protein, while 100% showed measurable neutralizing activity against the cattle-associated H5N1 strain A/Texas/37/2024 in a sensitive neutralization system.  (See link for article)

______________

Important excerpt:

While the study does not address transmission dynamics, it clearly demonstrates that baseline human immunity to H5N1 already exists—raising questions about whether current levels of alarm, experimentation, and preemptive intervention are scientifically justified.

Our government has been funding, to the tune of $500 million, for a ‘next generation’ pandemic vaccine project (BPL-1357 and BPL-24910), as well as gain-of-function bird flu viruses.

Both jabs claim to protect against bird flu, the very virus the government has been mutating in the lab with Bill Gates. Source

Government MO: create a problem, then provide the answer and solution that they will profit from.

Seems nothing has been learned from COVID; another gain-of-function experiment the government funded with taxpayer dollars that they profited from.

For more:

Gates has his fingers in so many pies it’s hard to keep them all straight:

      • infectious diseases yielding lucrative government contracts
      • vaccines – ignoring vaccine safety, encouraging pregnant women to get the fast-tracked, experimental COVID gene therapy, and promoting censorship on vaccine debate   Source
      • family planning
      • agriculture
      • climate change
      • food ‘security’
      • GMO research including ‘terminator seed’ projects, synthetic meat startups, and releasing GMO insects
      • the media – from BBC, NPR, The NY Times, The Atlantic, The Guardian, and much more to ‘fact’ checkers who silence online dissent.

Simpsonwood: The Day Vaccine Evidence Disappeared

https://kidsfirst4ever.substack.com/p/simpsonwood-the-day-the-evidence?  Go here for video if Youtube censors the one below.

Simpsonwood: The Day the Evidence Disappeared

How a Secret 2000 Meeting Reshaped Vaccine Safety — and Why the Truth Still Matters

http://  Approx. 5 Min

Every parent deserves honesty. Every child deserves protection. Yet, when it comes to vaccine safety, history shows us a pattern of quiet revisions, concealed conversations, and decisions made far from public view. The 2000 Simpsonwood meeting stands as one of the clearest examples of this.

​In this new four-minute documentary by Dr. K. Paul Stoller, we are taken inside a closed-door gathering held on June 7, 2000—a meeting that brought together 52 of the most powerful people in public health: CDC leadership, FDA regulators, WHO officials, and top vaccine industry executives. What they reviewed that day was nothing short of explosive. A CDC epidemiologist, analyzing data from 100,000 children, found dramatically increased risks of autism, speech disorders, ADHD, and tics in children with the highest thimerosal exposure. According to the transcript, the autism risk reached up to 11.35 times higher in the most-exposed group.

This was the “Generation Zero” analysis—stunning, urgent, and deeply inconvenient. What unfolded next, as the transcript reveals, was not a plan to protect children. It was a plan to protect the system.  (Go to link for article and video)

“These are not normal numbers. That’s not an epidemic. That’s a crime.” ~ Dr. Ken Stoller

Since 2000, they’ve never proven thimerosal is safe.  They just made the evidence disappear.

____________

**Comment**

Those in Lymeland will have déjà vu after watching the video.

At about the same time a meeting was held in Dearborn, Michigan where they removed the most specific band for Lyme testing due to not wanting to cause confusion with the vaccine they were creating.  Testing has remained abominable – with the sickest patients never testing positive, yet nary a word is mentioned about this quiet meeting that has ruled Lymeland for decades.

The video on Simpsonwood should nail the coffin shut entirely regarding whether or not you should trust the ‘experts’ on vaccines.  Please see links below for more vaccine shenanigans used to keep the ‘safe and effective’ narrative.

For more:

  • A crowdfunded lawsuit was filed (Thomas v. Monarez) against the CDC for recommending approximately 72 doses of vaccines to children without any studies ever having been done to examine the health effects of its vaccination schedule.  According to attorney Richard Jaffe, who filed the suit against the CDC on behalf of the plaintiffs.  This case puts the CDC’s entire childhood program on trial. For decades, the agency has demanded proof of harm while refusing to do the studies that could provide it, and physicians who attempt to fill that research gap or challenge the schedule or ACIP’s narrow contraindications and precautions framework are ridiculed and delicensed. Meanwhile, American children have become the sickest in the developed world under the most aggressive vaccine schedule on earth.

“They want to claim the program is safe? Fine, prove it.” ~ Richard Jaffe, Attorney

 

Another Baby Dies of ‘SIDS’ One Day After ‘Routine’ Vaccines

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/8-week-old-dies-sids-one-day-after-routine-vaccines-were-shots-blame/

8-Week-Old Dies of SIDS One Day After ‘Routine’ Vaccines — Were the Shots to Blame?

The death of an 8-week-old U.K. boy who was found unresponsive in his crib one day after he received more than one routine vaccine has been attributed to SIDS. The baby’s death certificate and an inquest did not list a cause of death. However, research has linked vaccines to SIDS and infant deaths.

vaccine bottle and letters "SIDS"

The baby’s death certificate and an inquest did not list a cause of death. However, research has linked vaccines to SIDS and infant deaths.

According to The Sun, Reuben Curry was born Dec. 17, 2023. His mother, Scarlet, found him unresponsive during the overnight hours of Feb. 17, 2024. He did not respond to efforts to revive him and was pronounced dead that day.

Scarlet told The Sun, “The day before his passing, I’d taken him for his vaccinations and he didn’t like them very much — but that’s normal for a baby.”

The Sun reported that Reuben experienced “complications” during birth but did not provide details. The report also didn’t state which vaccines Reuben received, where he was vaccinated or the name of the hospital where he was pronounced dead.

SIDS diagnosis is given when an infant under age 1 dies suddenly, typically during sleep, and an investigation into the death fails to yield a cause. Most SIDS deaths (95%) occur in the first six months of life, peaking at ages 2-4 months.

After birth defects and prematurity, SIDS is the third leading cause of death for infants. Yet the medical industry claims to remain puzzled about the cause.

An inquest shed no further light on the cause of Reuben’s death. “I didn’t actually get his death certificate until September last year due to an inquest, where they just couldn’t find anything,” Scarlet said. “There wasn’t a reason or an answer.”

Vaccinations ‘likely played a significant role’ in Reuben’s death

The Sun reported that SIDS claims the lives of around three babies per week in the U.K. In the U.S., more than five infant deaths are recorded per 1,000 live births.

According to The Sun, the exact cause of SIDS “remains unknown,” but risk factors may include “unsafe sleeping, overheating and smoking while pregnant.”

In November 2025, The Sun reported on a surge of a previously “rare” virus known as enterovirus-C105, which has been linked to SIDS cases.

Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher said he believes the vaccinations Reuben received “likely played a significant role in his unfortunate demise.”

According to the U.K.’s National Health Service, routine vaccinations administered at 8 weeks include the meningitis B, rotavirus, and 6-in-1 (diphtheria, hepatitis B, Haemophilus influenzae type b or Hib, polio, tetanus and whooping cough) shots.

Hulscher cited a preprint published last month by Children’s Health Defense (CHD) researchers Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., and Brian Hooker, Ph.D., which found that the 6-in-1 vaccine is “linked to a +153% increased odds of dying.” The preprint was subsequently withdrawn.  (See link for article)

_____________

**Comment**

Here’s the problem:

Medical researcher Neil Z. Miller said prophylactic vaccination was removed from the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) as an official cause of death in 1979. Now, “Medical examiners are compelled to misclassify potential vaccine-related fatalities under alternate cause-of-death classifications, such as SIDS.”

Due to a lack of code for vaccine deaths, coroners, pathologists and doctors can only choose between SIDS, SUDI and suffocation.

78% of all the SIDS deaths occur in the week after infant vaccines

I’m sure that’s just a coincidence. 

According to the corrupt AAP, there is no link between vaccines and SIDS.

For more:

 

U.S. Officially Withdraws From WHO

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/america-officially-withdraws-from

America Officially Withdraws from the World Health Organization

With the Pandemic Treaty in place, the Gates Foundation and GAVI now fill the power vacuum as top funders — putting WHO member states in danger.

by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

On January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump signed an executive order initiating the U.S. withdrawal from the WHO, citing its COVID-19 failures, lack of reforms, and disproportionate U.S. funding.

Today, that one-year notice period has officially expired — and the United States has formally withdrawn from the WHO, leaving the Gates Foundation and GAVI to fill the power vacuum as top funders:

My heart goes out to all remaining WHO member states… now answering directly to the vaccine cartel.

It’s important to remember that in May 2025, the WHO officially approved the WHO Pandemic Agreement — setting the stage for fast-tracked experimental vaccines, top-down emergency mandates, digital vaccine passports, expanded cross-border surveillance, and coordinated censorship of dissenting scientists and physicians under the banner of “misinformation.”

Last month, the WHO exposed just how degraded it has become by releasing an embarrassingly weak autism-vaccine report. The McCullough Foundation — with ~0.007% of the WHO’s budget — produced a far more comprehensive and scientifically grounded analysis.

We can chalk up this official withdrawal as a major win for the public health of America.

For more:

AAP Hit With RICO Lawsuit for Vaccine Safety Fraud

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-american-academy-of-pediatrics?

BREAKING: American Academy of Pediatrics Hit With Federal RICO Lawsuit for Vaccine Safety Fraud

AAP accused of operating a decades-long racketeering scheme that deceived America about vaccine safety for maximum profit.

by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

For decades, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has been treated like an untouchable authority on child health — the gold standard that parents, doctors, schools, and lawmakers were told to trust without question. But today, that image collapses. Children’s Health Defense (CHD) and multiple plaintiffs just filed a federal lawsuit alleging the AAP spent decades running a racketeering operation that sold parents false safety assurances about the childhood vaccine schedule.

This isn’t another “vaccine debate” lawsuit. It’s a RICO fraud case—the same legal weapon used against organized crime and the tobacco industry. The allegation is blunt and devastating: the AAP allegedly manufactured false certainty around vaccine schedule safety, shut down legitimate scientific scrutiny, and promoted sweeping assurances that were never validated through rigorous real-world safety testing—while operating within a system shaped by vaccine-manufacturer funding and financial incentives tied to high pediatric vaccination rates.

One of the most explosive points in the complaint is what it forces into the open. The cumulative childhood schedule has never been safety-tested the way any reasonable parent would assume it has. The lawsuit points to Institute of Medicine findings from 2002 and 2013 calling for more research and acknowledging the lack of proper vaccinated vs. unvaccinated comparisons. Yet the AAP continued portraying the schedule as thoroughly tested and unquestionably safe, shaping pediatric care nationwide through repetition, authority, and pressure—not proof.

The complaint also describes what parents have learned the hard way. This system doesn’t merely recommend vaccines. It demands compliance. Physicians who questioned the schedule or deviated from AAP protocols were professionally targeted, disciplined, and financially crushed. The message was clear: follow the script, or lose your career.

The lawsuit further argues that the AAP’s public reassurances were built on “theoretical” talking points that became institutional doctrine, including the infamous claim that infants could tolerate an extreme number of vaccines at once. According to the plaintiffs, this wasn’t evidence—it was marketing disguised as medical authority, repeated in clinics to silence questions and keep the assembly line moving.

Then there’s the part that makes it all make sense: money. The complaint highlights conflicts of interest and financial entanglements with vaccine manufacturers and aligned institutions. The AAP presents itself as independent and science-first, while operating in a world of corporate sponsorships, incentives, and industry relationships that would be unacceptable in any genuinely transparent public health organization.

This is why the lawsuit matters. It’s not about a single product. It challenges the entire protection racket that has propped up the pediatric vaccine industry for decades. AAP’s model has relied on one rule: the schedule is safe because we say it’s safe—and anyone who demands real proof gets smeared, censored, or destroyed.

The lawsuit seeks financial damages for the families and physicians harmed, demands disclosure of the lack of comprehensive safety testing behind the cumulative schedule, and aims to stop the AAP from making blanket, unqualified claims that the schedule is “safe and effective” as if that question has already been settled.

If this case advances, discovery alone could expose what the public has been denied for decades—and that would be a historic victory for medical transparency, informed consent, and accountability in pediatrics. For years, parents were told to “trust the experts,” while legitimate safety questions were mocked, censored, or punished. Now those questions are headed to the one place the system can’t silence them with talking points: federal court.  (See link for article)

____________

For more: