Archive for the ‘Treatment’ Category

Babesia Treatment: Dr. Cameron’s Clinical Tips

https://danielcameronmd.com/babesiosis-treatment/

Babesiosis Treatment: My Go To Clinical Tips

7/22/25

Babesiosis treatment is often overlooked—especially in patients who also have Lyme disease. Babesiosis is a malaria-like illness caused by microscopic parasites that infect red blood cells. It’s frequently found alongside Lyme, but just as often, it’s missed.

Unlike Lyme, which is caused by the bacterium Borrelia burgdorferi, babesiosis is caused by parasites (Babesia microti or Babesia duncani) and does not respond to doxycycline. Yet I continue to see Lyme patients who are only treated with doxycycline—even when symptoms strongly suggest babesiosis may be present.

So what do I use when babesiosis testing is negative but suspicion is high?

Let’s walk through my approach.


Why Testing for Babesiosis Falls Short

Babesiosis tests often fail—especially in patients with chronic or relapsing symptoms. Here’s why:

    1. Parasites are visible on blood smear only in early infection

    2. PCR (detects DNA) may miss low-level infections

    3. Antibody tests may remain negative for months—or fade over time

In my practice, I increasingly see positive Babesia antibodies after months of symptoms, even when earlier testing was negative. This tells me two things:

    1. Symptoms often precede test positivity.
    2. Waiting for test confirmation may delay needed treatment.

Babesiosis Treatment: Key Symptoms That Warrant Empiric Therapy

When testing fails but the clinical picture fits, I move forward with treatment.

Common babesiosis symptoms in my patients include:

    1. Night sweats (often drenching)

    2. Shortness of breath or “air hunger”

    3. Fatigue that worsens with activity

    4. Lightheadedness, POTS-like symptoms

    5. Temperature dysregulation

    6. Anxiety or depression out of proportion

These symptoms are sometimes dismissed as menopause, anxiety, or long COVID—but in a patient with a history of Lyme disease or tick exposure, they raise concern for babesiosis.


First-Line Babesiosis Treatment

When babesiosis is suspected, the first-line treatment I use is: Atovaquone + Azithromycin

This combination remains the most commonly prescribed regimen, with proven effectiveness.

    1. Atovaquone is an anti-parasitic that targets the Babesia organism in red blood cells.

    2. Azithromycin is an antibiotic that complements atovaquone’s activity.

Practical Note:

Many clinicians prescribe Mepron® (atovaquone 750 mg/5 mL oral suspension), but I’ve had success using Malarone® (atovaquone 250 mg + proguanil 100 mg tablets), which:

    1. Is better tolerated by many patients

    2. Is easier to obtain in outpatient practice

    3. Comes in pediatric-sized tablets (62.5 mg/25 mg) useful for dose titration

This flexibility allows me to individualize babesiosis treatment—especially for sensitive patients who cannot tolerate full adult dosing at first.


Newer Option: Tafenoquine

For resistant or relapsing babesiosis, I’ve also begun using: Tafenoquine (Krintafel®)

    1. Originally approved for malaria

    2. May be effective in difficult Babesia cases

    3. Requires screening for G6PD deficiency before use

    4. Still considered off-label in many outpatient Lyme protocols

Tafenoquine is not a first-line therapy, but it may have a role when patients relapse despite standard babesiosis treatment. I’m following the research closely.


Why I Don’t Use Clindamycin or Quinine

While clindamycin and quinine are sometimes recommended for severe babesiosis (especially hospitalized cases), I have not been using them in outpatient care. In my experience:

    1. Clindamycin + quinine causes significant nausea, tinnitus, and other side effects

    2. Not well tolerated in chronic or relapsing Lyme patients

    3. Alternative regimens (like atovaquone-based therapies) are typically sufficient

If a patient does not respond to first-line babesiosis treatment, I evaluate for possible co-infections (like Bartonella or Ehrlichia), medication tolerance, and drug absorption before moving to more aggressive regimens.


What I Watch for During Treatment

When treating babesiosis, I monitor:

    1. Liver enzymes (especially with Mepron)

    2. Hemoglobin and hematocrit (to assess for hemolysis)

    3. Symptom patterns (including Herxheimer reactions)

    4. Drug tolerance and adherence

Improvement can take time. But when patients begin to regain energy, lose their night sweats, and tolerate light exertion again, it’s a sign that treatment for babesiosis is working.


Final Thoughts on Babesiosis Treatment

Babesiosis doesn’t always show up on a lab test—but it can still cause profound illness, especially in those with Lyme disease or immune dysfunction.

If you’ve been treated for Lyme disease but still suffer from:

    1. Fatigue

    2. Night sweats

    3. Breathlessness

    4. POTS-like symptoms

… don’t assume it’s “just Lyme.” Babesiosis treatment may be the missing piece.

 References

________________

**Comment**

Fantastically practical article.

For more:

I believe Dr. Horowitz states that when you start treatment for Babesia, you need to keep going until it’s gone.  Stopping and starting makes it harder to treat in the long run.

A Masterclass on Tick-Borne Illness: Dr. Burrascano

http://  1 Hour 14 Min

Jul 16, 2025
Bay Area Lyme Foundation
Dr. Joseph J. Burrascano Jr., a pioneer in the field of Lyme, began his practice in East Hampton, NY, in 1981, where he identified and detailed the clinical aspects of Lyme in a high-prevalence area. Renowned for his groundbreaking diagnostic and treatment guidelines since 1984, he has advised the CDC, NIH, and U.S. Senate, authored extensive publications, and is a founding member of ILADS, continuing to educate globally.
For more:

Hospital COVID Protocols: The Grace Schara Case (WI)

https://imahealth.substack.com/p/hospital-covid-protocols-the-grace?

Hospital COVID Protocols: The Grace Schara Case

IMA Co-Founders Dr. Paul Marik and Dr. Joseph Varon are joined by Scott Schara and his attorney Warner Mendenhall to discuss medical advocacy, advance directives, and hospital accountability.

When Grace Schara died in a Wisconsin hospital during the COVID pandemic, her family began asking difficult questions about consent, protocol, and patient rights. This week, IMA Co-Founders Dr. Paul Marik and Dr. Joseph Varon are joined by Grace’s father, Scott Schara, and his attorney, Warner Mendenhall of Freedom Counsel, to revisit the case and discuss the broader implications for medical advocacy, advance directives, and hospital accountability.

We’ll explore the concerns raised around medication protocols, Do Not Intubate orders, and access to records—alongside the lessons learned about legal barriers, family involvement, and the importance of independent medical advocates. The conversation is shaped by IMA’s longstanding commitment to restoring the doctor-patient relationship and building safeguards that empower patients and families.

Whether you’re entering the hospital yourself or bringing a loved one for care, the assumption is that medical staff will do everything possible to help. But the tragic story of 19-year-old Grace reveals just how wrong things can go when trust breaks down, protocols fail, and communication vanishes.

Grace Schara entered St. Elizabeth’s Hospital in Wisconsin with low oxygen saturation during the COVID pandemic in October 2021. Her father, Scott Schara, believed she would simply receive oxygen therapy and come home safely. Instead, Grace passed away just days later under circumstances that sparked outrage and questions nationwide.

In the years following, Scott’s grief turned to advocacy, ultimately leading to Schara v. Ascension Health, the first COVID-era hospital negligence case in America to reach a jury trial. The landmark lawsuit, concluded on June 19, 2025, lasted three weeks and was passionately argued by a dedicated legal team led by Warner Mendenhall and Freedom Counsel.

Despite compelling expert testimony and a deeply sympathetic case, the jury ruled in favor of the hospital. Still, Scott and Warner remain undeterred. Their fight for justice continues—and so does the urgent conversation their case has sparked. In this powerful webinar, they reflect on what went wrong, what patients and families need to know, and how all of us, providers included, can help prevent tragedies like this from happening again.

Misunderstandings: “Do Not Intubate” (DNI) and “Do Not Resuscitate” (DNR)

Regardless of the jury’s verdict, the case has opened the door to vital lessons every patient, family, and provider needs to understand.

IMA co-founders, doctors Joseph Varon and Paul Marik, both experienced critical care physicians at Independent Medical Alliance (IMA), weighed in addressing the shocking failures in Grace’s care. They highlighted systemic misunderstandings around crucial terms like “Do Not Intubate” (DNI) and “Do Not Resuscitate” (DNR).

Dr. Marik explained:

“DNR means when a person is dead… not to resuscitate them. That’s what it means. It doesn’t mean do not treat, do not manage. It’s only when a patient is actually dead, heart has stopped beating and they’re clinically dead, that you do cardiopulmonary resuscitation… the DNI part complicates the issue.”

Dr. Varon emphasized the critical role of open, honest communication:

“I’m sure that if somebody told you ‘do not intubate’ means ‘do not resuscitate,’ you would have said ‘go ahead and intubate right now.’”

Under any circumstances, it’s unreasonable to expect patients and families to decode complex medical terminology in moments of crisis. But COVID has made one thing painfully clear: we must be prepared to ask questions, advocate for ourselves and our loved ones, and demand clarity.  (See link for article and video)

______________

For more:

The hospital COVID scam via The CARES Act:

Hospital protocols killed people:

The concerted strategy to ban effective COVID treatment, allowing the clot shots to be deployed:

CDC monopolizes fraudulent COVID testing:

Covid Shots Induce Cancer in 17 Distinct Ways According to More Than 100 Studies & ‘Vaccine’ Exemptions Online Talk July 22, 2025

https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/modified-mrna-slow-kill-bioweaponvaccines

by Mathilde Debord

Article Excerpts:

Is mass vaccination against COVID causing an explosion in cancer cases, as many scientists claim, some of whom had it prophesied from May 2021 ? A collective of French oncologists published two years ago a platform in which they categorically refute this hypothesis: ” To date, no alert link has been published between an increased incidence or risk of rapid progression of cancer after COVID-19 vaccination or after another vaccination.” Today they claim to be confronted with a tsunami of dazzling cancers, particularly among young people, to which they say they find no rational explanation:

We have a rapid increase in pancreatic cancer without us having the slightest idea of the reason. Something happened? We do not know. The whole world, all of world oncology is asking itself the question. […] The system that allows us to understand cancer is faulty.

Professor Khayat, co-founder of InCA

If Professor Khayat is consistent, he cannot theoretically exclude that vaccination could be at the origin of this explosion of cancer cases since it is (1) extremely recent if we refer to his previous interventions, (2) it affects the entire planet –in particular populations who have been forced to inject to maintain a social life or who have aggressively promoted vaccination (influencers in particular) –, and (3) it seems to respond to an unprecedented logic. As would a substance used for the first time in humans, of which only part of the composition is known and whose impact on cancer has not been assessed before its massive deployment[1].

Epidemiologist Nicolas Huscher listed last March 10 Ways Anti-COVID Messenger RNA Injections Can Cause Cancer. This list, resulting from a study[2] published in December 2023 in the journal Cureus can in our opinion be extended today to 17 items based (non-exhaustive) on more than 100 studies(See link for article)

________________

The 17 Ways are as follows:

  1. Genome instability
  2. Immune evasion
  3. Mechanism of repair of altered DNA
  4. Chronic inflammation
  5. Dysregulation of the immune system
  6. RNA disruption
  7. Activation of oncogenic pathways
  8. Tumor microenvironment
  9. Awakening of dormant cancers
  10. Impaired immune monitoring
  11. Frame offset (frameshift)
  12. Multiple injections
  13. DNA contamination of the Pfizer & Moderna shots
  14. DNA sequences of oncogenic SV40 in Pfizer shot
  15. Deregulation of the renin-angiotensin system
  16. Destruction of the microbiota
  17. Increased resistance to treatments

The articles gives the Joe Tippens Protocol for cancer.

For more:

‘Vaccine’ Exemptions

With Mary Holland

Date: July 22, 2025

Time:  8pm ET

Join us as we discuss vaccine exemptions and what you need to know about your legal rights as you navigate the educational school system, at all levels. For this UpClose, I will be joined by Kim Mack Rosenberg, General Counsel for Children’s Health Defense, and Kevin Barry, Esq., who has been advocating and supporting families as they navigate New York vaccine exemptions, which are among some of the most restrictive in the nation. 

As always, we will leave ample time for our experts to answer your questions. However, this month you will have the opportunity to submit questions prior to the event. A link to submit your questions will be provided after you register, with submissions accepted until Friday, July 18th. We hope this format will allow our experts to address more specific questions and concerns. Please note that not all submitted questions will be answered, and any information shared should not be considered legal advice but general guidance. 

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/support/about-chd-upclose3  Register Here

CHD hosts monthly UpClose virtual events and various UpClose InPerson events throughout the year for supporters who donate $10 or more within one year of the event date, or are current recurring donors.

For more:

Lyme Treatment Explained: Co-infections & Complex Cases

https://imahealth.substack.com/p/lyme-treatment-explained-co-infections

Lyme Treatment Explained: Co-infections and Complex Cases

IMA Senior Fellow Dr. Yusuf (JP) Saleeby hosts Part 3 in a series of Weekly Webinars on diagnosing and treating Lyme Disease.

Speakers: Dr. Yusuf (JP) Saleeby, Dr. Tom Moorcroft, Chris Jackman, FNP

Lyme disease is notoriously difficult to treat, but it’s even more complex than most realize. That’s because Lyme doesn’t always travel alone. Associated tick-borne co-infections like Bartonella and Babesia can mimic or mask Lyme symptoms, requiring different treatments to resolve. This reality turns Lyme treatment into a winding, uncertain road for patients and providers alike.

Luckily, we’ve enlisted some of the world’s top experts in Lyme and chronic disease to help demystify this debilitating condition. Join IMA Senior Fellow Dr. JP Saleeby as he hosts a practical conversation with Lyme specialist Dr. Tom Moorcroft and integrative nurse practitioner Chris Jackman. Together, they’ll break down what makes Lyme so persistent, how co-infections complicate recovery, and what successful treatment protocols can look like in the real world.

This is the third installment in IMA’s Lyme Disease series—an essential session for patients, practitioners, and anyone trying to make sense of this often-misunderstood chronic condition. Catch up with the previous episodes here:  (See link for article and video seminars)

More from IMA on Lyme:

Check out our ever-expanding Lyme Library for more:

_________________

For more:

One things for sure: a multi-drug combination is required for this.  Doctors who still prescribe ONE drug for this are hopelessly in the dark.  I would even add that ONE drug for an acute case isn’t enough and that tinidazole should be pulsed along with daily doxycycyline or minocycline until symptoms are completely gone.  I would also recommend blood ozone – the stronger the betterEBOO preferably.  If other coinfection symptoms arise – then the drugs that are effective for them should be layered in.  This is no joke, and the days of treating this passively are long gone.  Wake up doctors and do the right thing!