Archive for the ‘Testing’ Category

Western Massachusetts Woman Files Lawsuit Over Home Test For Lyme Disease

https://www.masslive.com/springfield/2023/10/western-massachusetts-woman-files-lawsuit-over-home-test-for-lyme-disease.html

Western Massachusetts woman files lawsuit over home test for Lyme disease

SPRINGFIELD — A home test for Lyme disease from LetsGetChecked comes in a box with a message on the inside. “It’s good to know,” it reads.

A recently filed lawsuit has a different phrase for the test: “false advertising with tragic consequences.”

Filed in U.S. District court in Springfield, the class action lawsuit alleges that the LetsGetChecked test is not accurate, deceives customers and violates consumer protection law.

Moira Kerans, who lives in Dalton, and TruthCures, a Kansas-based nonprofit focused on Lyme disease, filed the suit in June against LetsGetChecked. It demands a jury trial and $5 million in damages.

The company ”strongly disputes” the lawsuit’s claims, LetsGetChecked spokesperson Emily Ryan said in an email. “As this matter is subject to legal proceedings, we shall be making no further comments,” Ryan said.  (See link for article)

________________

**Comment**

A few important points:

  • The article makes sure to state that the FDA has NOT approved any home tests for Lyme disease.  What it fails to mention is that the current “cleared” 2-tiered testing is also abysmal, yet because it’s “cleared” by the FDA, it is the only accepted test which has kept patients from proper diagnosis for decades. This testing problem goes back to the Second National Conference on Lyme Disease Testing in Dearborn, Michigan in 1994 and will continue to be a problem because the CDC recommends tests with the FDA stamp on it.  They purposely took out the most specific band for Lyme due to their vested interest in a Lyme vaccine but continue to blather about “reliability” when it’s not reliable at all!   It’s a sad state of affairs.
  • The FDA is guilty of stifling, banning, or censoring anything it considers a threat to its monopoly, including testing.  This out of control agency receives money from the very companies it regulates, and needs to be eliminated.
  • While I agree that this home test should not be a substitute for a doctor’s visit, I would also emphasize that neither should the FDA approved test be a substitute for a doctor’s visit, but herein lies another problem: doctors are hopelessly lost on virtually everything Lyme/MSIDS related.  Medical schools only teach a CDC narrative based on 40 year old science done by a Cabal that has vested interests.
  • LetsGetChecked must file a formal response to the complaint in court later this month, according to the online docket.  As far as I’m concerned the CDC and FDA have had a lot to answer for as well.

Why Lyme Spirochetes Are Like Stealth Bombers

https://www.lymedisease.org/lyme-stealth-bombers/

Why Lyme spirochetes are like stealth bombers

By Lonnie Marcum
12/7/23

Borrelia burgdorferi, the bacteria that causes Lyme disease, can persist in animals and humans because it has evolved complex mechanisms to avoid the immune system.

In a 1996 interview with The Scientist magazine, Stephen Barthold, DVM, PhD, the researcher who developed the first mouse model of Lyme disease, described Borrelia burgdorferi’s ability to avoid immune detection as a form of cloaking. “It’s using some sort of stealth-bomber-type mechanism,” he said.

Since then, Professor Barthold has gone on to partner with many researchers in the pursuit of learning how B. burgdorferi causes chronic infection, including Monica Embers, PhD, from Tulane University.

Nicole Baumgarth, DVM, PhD, now the director of the Johns Hopkins Lyme and Tickborne Diseases Research and Education Institute, has years of experience collaborating with Barthold.

The latest research by Baumgarth, Barthold and others at University of California, Davis offers the science community one more clue as to how Borrelia is able to subvert the immune system leading to persistent infection in mice.

Their paper entitled, “Borrelia burgdorferi Infection–Induced Persistent IgM Secretion Controls Bacteremia, but Not Bacterial Dissemination or Tissue Burden,” has shed new light on how these pathogens persist in tissues, but present in very low numbers in the blood.

As Dr. Baumgarth tells me, “Blood is not the way Borrelia gets around the mice. Rather it migrates through tissues.”

These new findings may offer a possible explanation as to why disseminated Borrelia is both harder to treat, and so difficult to detect in blood samples.

Immune system basics

The immune system is roughly divided into two: the innate immune system and the adaptive immune system.

The innate immune system is our body’s first line of defense against pathogens and harmful substances. When working properly, it reacts immediately, but non-specifically, to all foreign invaders.

In contrast, the adaptive immune system is more targeted. It relies on prior exposure to learn and generate protective antibodies. The adaptive immune system remembers previous encounters and develops specific weapons (B-cells and T-cells) to fight each pathogen.

IgM vs IgG Antibodies

When the immune system detects any foreign substance, it produces antibodies which trigger the innate and later the adaptive immune system. IgM (immunoglobulin M) and IgG (immunoglobulin G) are two types of antibodies produced by the immune system.

IgM, the larger of these two immunoglobulins, is an early type of antibody to emerge in the development of an immune response. It acts as the initial defense against infections and is a strong activator of the complement system immune response that helps to clear pathogens.

The complement system consists of multiple proteins (C1 to C9) that summon phagocytes to the site of infection. Phagocytes (macrophages, neutrophils, lymphocytes) are components of the innate immune system that destroy pathogens. [For a crash course on the complement system watch this video.]

IgM is very effective in the blood stream. However, the size of IgM antibodies impedes their ability to penetrate all the tissues of the body. This limits IgM’s ability to send phagocytes into deeper tissues (eg. joints, heart, brain) where infection may be hiding.

IgG, a smaller, more penetrable antibody, is produced later in the immune response. IgG levels typically increase over a longer period of time, in some cases promoting the immune system to develop long-term immunity to future infection.

Study shows Borrelia impairs immune response

This new study shows how persistent Borrelia burgdorferi triggers a prolonged initial (IgM) immune response, and can impair a secondary (IgG) immune response.

This initial (IgM) response leads to fewer Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb) in the blood stream while the infection continues to spread throughout the body.

In addition, Borrelia’s prolonged IgM response in both humans and animals leads to a reduction in antibody-mediated clearance of the infection from deeper tissues.

The authors state, “Together the data demonstrated that IgG, but not IgM, is critical for the long-term control of B. burgdorferi tissue burden or disease induction. Despite that, Borrelia tissue dissemination in mice appeared very little affected by the rate of bacteremia, suggesting the B. burgdorferi main mode of dissemination in mice occurs by means other than via the blood.”

How IgM causes false-negatives

This research has shown that the standard definition of IgM as an acute response versus IgG as chronic response may be problematic in the classification of Lyme disease.

The Lyme disease Western Blot detects IgM and IgG responses to specific proteins found on Borrelia burgdorferi—for example: OspC (band 23-25), OspA (band 31), OspB (ban 34), BmpA protein (band 39), and flagellin protein (band 63-93).

In people with healthy immune systems, the Lyme disease IgM is normally detectable within a couple of weeks after infection, typically peaking around 4-6 weeks, then slowly declining over the next several months. The IgG begins around 4-6 weeks, peaking around 4-6 months, then slowly declining over the next several years.

Unfortunately, people who are immune-compromised, and/or fighting more than one infection (co-infection), may never develop a robust IgG response. The lack of the IgG response also prevents the immune system from finding and clearing bacteria embedded within deeper tissues, further impairing the healing process.

 In the experimental Bb mouse model, despite extensive antibiotic treatment, IgM production continued for months. This is consistent with human Lyme disease studies demonstrating continued IgM response as long as 10 years, even in patients treated with antibiotics.

As the authors state, this is “a remarkable observation, given the short half-life of IgM, considered to be <24 hours.” Meaning a prolonged IgM is likely coming from the immune system reacting to persistent Borrelia.

The continued production of IgM in the blood stream may explain why Borrelia is so difficult to detect in blood samples.

And because the CDC discredits the presence of IgM after four weeks, the prolonged IgM is likely contributing to the high rate of false-negative standard tests for Lyme disease.

Per the CDC website, “the IgM Western Blot test result is only meaningful during the first four weeks of illness. If you have been infected for longer than 4 to 6 weeks and the IgG Western Blot is still negative, it is highly likely that the IgM result is incorrect (e.g., a false positive). This does not mean that you are not ill, but it does suggest that the cause of illness is something other than the Lyme disease bacterium.”

We now have evidence that this is simply not true in all cases.

Difficult to Detect

In 2019, I attended a vector-borne disease conference at University of California, San Francisco. While there, *Dr. Charles Chiu explained how his powerful direct detection DNA sequencing system—able to detect thousands of pathogens—was just not finding enough Borrelia burgdorferi in the blood stream of humans to work effectively. (See my live tweets of Chiu’s presentation here.)

I was just baffled how such a powerful tool could not consistently detect Lyme disease in humans. Now, knowing that IgM remains in the blood stream longer, keeping the bacteria numbers low, may help us understand this phenomenon.

The fact that the prolonged IgM reduces the presence of Bb in the blood stream helps to explain why next-generation serologic tests using direct detection of DNA or proteins may not be able to detect Bb in patients who are suffering from chronic Lyme disease.

[*Since then Dr. Chiu has gone on partner with Johns Hopkins University where they have developed a next-generation gene sequencing technique, called RNA-seq, to map the immune response to infection. And most recently Chiu has partnered with Columbia University to open the first West Coast Center for the Clinical Trials Network.]

Immune Disruption

Also covered in Baumgarth’s paper is another strategy Bb has developed to evade the immune system. Within 24 hours after the tick bite, Bb quickly invades and is detectible in the lymph nodes nearest the site of infection.

On the surface, this seems counterintuitive, as the lymph nodes contain many life-saving immune cells.

However, once Bb is in the lymph nodes, the spirochetes induce a signal that disrupts the “germinal centers” within the lymph node architecture. Ultimately, this alters the adaptive immune response of the lymphatics and impairs the immune system by limiting memory B and T cell production.

In addition, new research from Johns Hopkins has shown that Bb impairs dendritic cells. Dendritic cells are a type of immune cell spread throughout the body. Once activated, dendritic cells migrate to the lymph nodes, where they activate the adaptive immune response. Bb’s alteration of the dendritic cells also impairs the formation of memory B and T cells.

When the immune system functions properly, IgM is produced and triggers an immune response that is good at controlling bacteremia in the blood stream. From there, an IgG response is required to control dissemination outside the blood stream.

IgM and IgG also help to trigger macrophages, a type of white blood cell that envelops and destroys pathogens. The lack of this secondary IgG response prevents macrophages from getting the message to enter and clear Bb infection from deeper tissues—which contributes to persistent infection outside the bloodstream.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the authors “propose that the continued production of immune IgM is a manifestation of B. burgdorferi mediated B cell response subversion and represents an immune evasion strategy of B. burgdorferi. It may promote B. burgdorferi dissemination out of the blood and into the skin, where it can remain until attachment and bite of a tick will induce it to migrate toward the site of the tick bite.”

I was always told Bb likes to leave the blood stream and hide in zones of the body where it is protected from the immune system. This new study shows how Bb actually uses our own immune system to aide in its ability to hide. This strategy allows Bb to survive and attain its ultimate goal— which is not to kill the host, but to get picked up by another tick and spread to another host.

Over 40 years since the discovery of the spirochete responsible for Lyme disease, we are inching closer to understanding how Borrelia burgdorferi suppresses and evades the immune system.

LymeSci is written by Lonnie Marcum, a physical therapist and mother of a daughter with Lyme. She served two terms on a subcommittee of the federal Tick-Borne Disease Working Group. Follow her on Twitter: @LonnieRhea  Email her at: lmarcum@lymedisease.org.

Reference

Hastey CJ, Olsen KJ, Elsner RA, Mundigl S, Tran GVV, Barthold SW, Baumgarth N. Borrelia burgdorferi Infection-Induced Persistent IgM Secretion Controls Bacteremia, but Not Bacterial Dissemination or Tissue Burden. J Immunol. 2023 Nov 15;211(10):1540-1549. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2300384. PMID: 37782044.

_______________

For more:

Federal Oversight of Lab Tests Part 2

Go here for Part 1.

https://www.change.org/p/the-us-senate-calling-for-a-congressional-investigation-of-the-cdc-idsa-and-aldf/u/

Medscape: New Federal Oversight of Lab Developed Tests (Part 2)

Carl Tuttle

Hudson, NH, United States

DEC 4, 2023 — 

Follow-up letter to Auwaerter’s Commentary on Medscape:

New Federal Oversight of Lab Developed Tests
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/997365

———- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: “pauwaert@jhmi.edu” <pauwaert@jhmi.edu>, “pgauwaerter@gmail.com” <pgauwaerter@gmail.com>
Cc: “aaguilar@webmd.net” <aaguilar@webmd.net>, “DFlapan@Medscape.net” <DFlapan@Medscape.net>, “lkane@medscape.net” <lkane@medscape.net>, “gamiller@medscape.net” <gamiller@medscape.net>, “dolmos@webmd.net” <dolmos@webmd.net>, “sarah.wright@webmd.net” <sarah.wright@webmd.net>, “editor2@webmd.net” <editor2@webmd.net>, “dqhh@westchestergov.com” <dqhh@westchestergov.com>, “jmm2@uab.edu” <jmm2@uab.edu>, “sarah.long@drexelmed.edu” <sarah.long@drexelmed.edu>, “scalderwood@partners.org” <scalderwood@partners.org>, “cbusky@idsociety.org” <cbusky@idsociety.org>, “tjohnson@idsociety.org” <tjohnson@idsociety.org>
Date: 11/01/2023 9:04 AM EDT
Subject: Re: Medscape: New Federal Oversight of Lab Developed Tests

“I often see patients who are concerned they might have Lyme disease, or they’ve been told by other physicians that they have a tickborne or multiple infections. I’ve had patients who claim to have five or six infections: Lyme disease, Babesia, Bartonella, Mycoplasma, or Epstein-Barr virus. -Dr. Paul Auwaerter/Medscape

Dr. Auwaerter,

The following recent study (15 Aug 2023) shows that “multiple tickborne infections” are common as a third of these 140 individuals had more than just Lyme disease. Only 52% of patients recalled having a tick bite, while 46% did not exhibit a bull’s-eye rash.

My inquiry to you that has gone unanswered:

What “FDA approved Tick-Borne Disease Panel” are you recommending so as not to miss any of these infections?

A Longitudinal Study of a Large Clinical Cohort of Patients with Lyme Disease and Tick-Borne Co-Infections Treated with Combination Antibiotics
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/11/9/2152

Summary By Dr. Daniel Cameron:
https://danielcameronmd.com/how-effective-is-combination-antibiotic-treatment-for-tick-borne-infections/

In their article “A Longitudinal Study of a Large Clinical Cohort of Patients with Lyme Disease and Tick-Borne Co-Infections Treated with Combination Antibiotics” Xi and colleagues looked at 140 individuals who tested positive for tick-borne infections (TBI) with 33% of those patients infected with multiple TBIs.¹

The authors found that out of the 140 participants:

-93 (66.43%) had positive antibody responses to one tick-borne infection
-83 (59.29%) were positive for Borrelia
-7 (5.00%) were positive for Rickettsia
-1 (0.71%) each for either Babesia, Bartonella, or Ehrlichia

The remaining 47 (33.57%) patients were infected with multiple tick-borne infections, including Borrelia, Babesia, Bartonella, Ehrlichia and Rickettsia.

The majority of patients were treated with a triple antibiotic combination regimen.

Most of the participants received 500 mg cefuroxime, 300 mg rifampicin, and 300 mg lymecycline. Treatment duration ranged between 12 and 40 weeks.

In the first follow-up visit with 118 patients, 59% reported having pain and 41% had neurological symptoms. Meanwhile, there was continued improvement in patient symptoms at the second follow-up visit. Out of 101 patients, 41% reported having pain and 30% had neurological symptoms.

“There were statistically significant reductions in the incidence of pain and neurological symptoms between follow-ups,” the authors wrote.

“Thus, our study demonstrates that combination antibiotics effectively relieve TBI symptoms with good patient tolerance.”

According to the survey, 52% of patients recalled having a tick bite, while 46% did not exhibit a bull’s-eye rash.

The patients exhibited significant improvements in their health status during the first and second follow-up visits.

“The three most common symptoms reported by the patients were pain, fatigue, and neurological symptoms, such as a tingling sensation in the limbs and memory defects,” the authors wrote.

At the second follow-up visit, “The number of patients suffering from pain, neurological symptoms, and fatigue decreased by 41.43%, 37.50%, and 17.54%, respectively,” according to the authors.

The improvement in pain and neurological symptoms was significant but fatigue continued to be problematic for patients.

Authors Takeaways:

“Our study established that most patients in this cohort were infected with the Borrelia burgdorferi species, and about a third had co-infections with other tick-borne pathogens.”

“Approximately half of the patients recalled receiving a tick bite and developing a bull’s-eye rash.”

“Pain, fatigue, and neurological symptoms were among the most common persistent symptoms.”

Dr. Auwaerter,
 
What FDA approved Tick-Borne Disease Panel are you recommending so as not to miss any of these infections?

On 10/30/2023 10:21 AM EDT CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net> wrote:

Dr. Auwaerter,

Let me remind you that as Vice Chair representing the IDSA Foundation, you are required to respond to inquiries regarding any statements you make in public otherwise your credibility/integrity is in question.

Carl Tuttle

______________

And BOOM! Carl knocks the opponent out of the ring.

Borreliosis Test

The following test is from a specialized, private lab called DEDIMED which is in Berlin, Germany; however, patients who do not live in Berlin receive blood sampling kits for the 18 Parameter Borrelia test. With this blood sampling material, they then go to their doctor and send the tube with the blood and the requirement to DEDIMED. The findings are then discussed with Dr. Waldherr by phone and sent to the patient by mail. A short telephone call with specialist physician Dr. Waldherr is recommended, in order to clarify questions about the diagnosis, illness and treatment and to obtain detailed information.

Dr. Waldherr uses a total of 18 different tests for Borrelia antibodies; Which is significantly more than other labs. The hit rate here is well over 90 percent, whether the patient is serologically positive or negative. Two different measurement techniques are used. The immunofluorescence test with 12 parameters and the immunoblot test with 6 parameters. Within the framework of these measurement techniques, no classical screenings are carried out, but differentiation is made between the different, pathogenic types of borrelia. Thus a very high sensitivity and specificity is achieved.

In addition, Dr. Waldherr offers in his practice a tick test with subsequent diagnostics to investigate whether ticks are colonized with Borrelia or TBE virus.

https://dedimed.com/en/patients/borreliosis/ak-18save/

BORRELIOSIS TEST AK-18SAVE

Safe and reliable diagnose Borreliosis

Chronic infections such as borreliosis increase the stress on the body. This is often manifested by persistent exhaustion, burnout symptoms or even joint pain. With the AK-18Save Borreliosis Test, you can safely diagnose Borreliosis and then choose the right therapy:

  • The most sensitive test combination on the market: with two test methods and 18 tested parameters, we achieve high sensitivity and specificity.
  • Safe result: Our hit rate is comparatively high at 90%, thus reducing false-negative results.
  • Ease of use: Patients outside Berlin can order blood collection kits.

Why is a safe diagnosis of chronic infections important?

An infection is a general stress on the body. A stressor that creates stress for the body. In acute, then healing infections the stress is correspondingly declining rapidly. However, a chronic stress develops during a chronic infection.

A chronic infection such as Lyme borreliosis is an “energy eater” and consumes 1/3 of the biochemical energy that humans produce. This constant “stress” of the body leads to the exhaustion of the neurotransmitters (messengers) and can lead to the development of a burnout. Further consequences are, for example, pain in the area of ​​the joints. Another manifestation is found in the nervous system, the so-called neuroborreliosis.

Unspecific symptoms usually result from a chronic infection. Thes are often not recognized as the result of one or more diseases and is often treated as psychosomatic. Lyme borreliosis is the consequence of ticks.

How do you achieve such a high hit rate?

By analyzing with two measurement techniques, we are able to determine significantly more features of the antigen structure of the Borrelia than is possible with standard tests. With both tests we determine the antibodies. We determine the surface characteristics (IFT) of the antigens and we also separate them according to mass and charge (IB). Thus, we get a very sensitive statement about a borrelia infection of the patient.

Within the framework of these two antibody tests we are testing two Borreliosis antibodies IgG and IgM. These are the body’s own proteins which form a defensive reaction. They are of different sizes and occur at different times:

  • IgM is formed as the first reaction to an infection and disappears after some time. IgM is therefore usually an indication of an acute thrust of a chronic infection.
  • IgG occurs subsequently and remains longer, up to many years, and marks the transition to the healing or to the chronic phase.

Why is chronic borreliosis so difficult to diagnose?

The reliable diagnosis of chronic borreliosis is difficult to determine for various reasons. On the one hand, the symptoms of chronic borreliosis are very different, diverse and unspecific.

After the bite of ticks only every second develops a flush. At the same time, you are often associated with other diseases such as rheumatism or depression (neuroborreliosis). Borrelia also has a camouflage mechanism and can change their surface structure. In addition, they can manifest themselves at the most diverse and different points of the body. Because of the different pathogenic Borrelia species, it is particularly difficult to make a targeted diagnosis.

The standard tests have a much lower hit rate than the AK-18Save Borreliosis Test, are inaccurate and can be negative, even if the patients are infected.

Together with the anamnesis and the symptoms, this results in a clear diagnosis for a subsequent targeted treatment. The Dedimed AK-18Save Borreliosis Test is thus more accurate and reliable than other tests currently available on the market.

What are the disadvantages of standard borreliosis tests?

The standardized tests often lead to “false negative” results, which is absolutely fatal for the person concerned and a wrong diagnosis is made. In the AK-18Save Borreliosis test, we prevent a misdiagnosis with a 90 % certainty and the patient is equally certain there is an infection.

Dedimed is often the eighth or ninth starting point for the person concerned because the previous examinations did not bring any results with different doctors.
Borrelia is very variable in its antigen structure: some features are found in several species of Borrelia, some in only a few. In many standardized screening tests, rare characteristics are not recognized. The result: false-negative finding. With our borreliosis test we detect both the frequent and the rare characteristics.

What role do co-infections play in the diagnosis of borreliosis?

Borreliosis alone can cause mild to severe symptoms. But what many do not know is that ticks can transmit different co-infections together with the Borrelia. These include pathogens such as Bartonella, Babesia, Rickettsia or Chlamydia, which in turn can cause various symptoms. Co-infections are also predominantly diagnosed by our two immunoblot (IB) and immunofluorescence (IFT) test methods.

TIP: Blood Collection Kit Borrelia Test: Patients who do not live in Berlin receive blood collection kits. With this blood sampling material, the patients then go to their (mostly a family doctor) and send the tube with the blood and the request form to our borreliosis practice. The findings are then mostly discussed with our physician Dr. Waldherr by phone and sent to the patient by mail.

What is a Borreliosis Therapy?

A chronic infection, such as chronic borreliosis, but also the associated co-infections, present a great challenge both diagnostically and therapeutically.

Acute and fresh bacterial infections can usually be treated very well by means of a consequent antibiotic therapy for several weeks..

On the other hand, chronic infections with regard to the therapy are more differentiated and represent a much greater challenge. During a chronic active borreliosis, longer-term antibiotics (minimum 3 months) is usually required. This can be done either by oral injection or by infusion.

Another very effective therapy to fight the Borrelia is the extreme whole-body hyperthermia. Borrelia are thermolabile and die at a temperature of 41.6 degrees. Here the patients are brought effectively to temperature. Extreme hyperthermia is only performed under strict medical supervision by monitoring vital signs.

Do you have any questions about our borreliosis test?

A short phone call with our laboratory physician, Dr. med. Anton Waldherr Tel. + 49 (0) 033203 is recommended.

labor@dedimed.com

_______________

For more:

Bartonella Case Reports

https://danielcameronmd.com/bartonella-associated-psychiatric-symptoms/

CASE REPORTS: BARTONELLA ASSOCIATED WITH PSYCHIATRIC SYMPTOMS

bartonella-psychiatric-symptoms

The Bartonella pathogen can be carried and transmitted by various animals and insects including fleas, flea feces, cat licks or scratches, ticks, lice, and biting flies. The infection has been associated with new-onset neurologic and psychiatric symptoms.

In their 2007 article, “Do Bartonella Infections Cause Agitation, Panic Disorder, and Treatment-Resistant Depression?” Schaller and colleagues describe 3 patients with acute psychiatric symptoms associated with Bartonella-like sign and symptoms.¹

Each of the patients was exposed to ticks or fleas and manifest symptoms consistent with Bartonella, i.e., an enlarged lymph node near an Ixodes tick bite and bacillary angiomatosis found only in Bartonella infections, according to the authors.

“… we have presented case studies of patients with new clear psychiatric morbidity, sudden agitation, panic attacks, and treatment-resistant depression, all possibly attributed to Bartonella.”

The patients were treated at an outpatient clinic for acute-onset personality changes including agitation, depression and panic attacks.

Interestingly, treatment with psychotropics was not effective in relieving their symptoms.

However, “After receiving antibiotic treatment for presumed Bartonella, [psychotropic] doses were reduced and all patients improved significantly, returning to their baseline mental health status,” the authors wrote.

In this article, we highlight 2 of those cases.

CASE #1

A 41-year-old man had a complete personality change, according to his family, following a camping trip in North Carolina. The man developed a small, “aching” right-sided axillary lymph node and fever after the trip. He had removed 3 deer ticks from his leg and shoulder.

Five weeks later, he exhibited irritability, severe insomnia, rage and sensitivity to smells and sounds. He also reported having an “enlarged and very annoying” right-sided axillary lymph node which had been present since the trip.

Lyme disease testing was negativeHowever, clinicians suspected Bartonella, given his unilateral lymph node symptom and tick bite.

“A PCR test for 2 Bartonella species was negative, but positive for B henselae when repeated,” the authors wrote.

During the next 2 weeks, the patient developed serious agitation, panic attacks, and major depression.

“He was so agitated that during arguments with his spouse, he threw objects such as kitchen glasses, a baseball, and a chair into his home’s drywall.”

The patient was diagnosed with bipolar disorder, although he had no previous history of depression or mania. However, psychotropic medications did not relieve his symptoms.

“At this point, the patient still had a large tender unilateral lymph node, fatigue, and new papules under his right arm,” the authors wrote. “Various causes of persistent large unilateral lymph nodes with papules were felt to fit a diagnosis of Bartonella.”

An infectious disease clinician prescribed azithromycin and Rifampin for suspected Bartonella infection.

After 8 weeks of treatment, the patient’s lymph node complaints resolved. And, his psychiatric symptoms were reduced substantially.

“His personality is felt to be 90% of baseline, according to his spouse and closest friend.”

“We suggest this man’s psychiatric problems support a Bartonella presentation,” as he had a positive response to antibiotics targeting Bartonella and his psychiatric symptoms resolved almost simultaneously with the resolution of his enlarged lymph node.

CASE #2

A medical student reported having a rash on her thighs consisting of 4 linear lines, which developed after she had adopted 2 young cats from a shelter. She also reported having several flea bites.

“The patient complained of new panic attacks, profound restlessness, and depression that began around the time of her new thigh rashes,” the authors wrote.

Treatment with psychotropic medications was not effective.

The patient’s nurse practitioner suspected Bartonella and prescribed a course of cefuroxime and azithromycin.

During the first week of treatment, the young woman became “increasingly sad, irritable, and hopeless, with increased panic attacks,” the authors wrote. Week 2, the symptoms had subsided slightly. By week 3, the rash had disappeared and by the 8th week, her depression and anxiety had improved substantially.

Six months later, some of the symptoms reappeared with “moderate return of inappropriate anger, excess interpersonal sensitivity, severe premenstrual dysphoric disorder, irritability, and sadness.”

The patient was retreated with rifampicin and cefdinir and improved somewhat.

The author’s point out that all of the patients initially required higher doses of psychotropic medications to function normally. However, following antibiotic treatment, doses were reduced or stopped entirely as Bartonella symptoms appeared to remit.