Archive for the ‘Testing’ Category

WSJ Says Chronic Lyme Was Once Dismissed But Doctors Are Coming Around – I Disagree

FILE_7701.pdf  Article Here

Chronic Lyme Disease Was Once Dismissed. More Doctors Are Coming Around.

Newer trials are starting to track Lyme patients and investigate potential treatments

By Brianna Abbott Jul 20, 2025

(See link above for article)

_____________

Why This Research Won’t Help Patients One Iota

By Alicia Cashman, Madison Lyme Support Group, Wisconsin

7/24/25

Summary of WSJ article:

  • A 63 year old Massachusetts woman was told in 2015 the root of her odd, flulike illness was likely Lyme disease.  (This website has hundreds if not thousands of such stories)
  • For the next decade she cycled through ‘unproven’ treatments and got push-back from doctors. (They must push the ‘not proven’ issue to keep us all from getting extended antibiotics which would make a majority of us better)
  • When MIT starting recruiting ‘people just like her,’ she felt validated.
  • The article then states ‘long COVID,’ is what is bringing chronic Lyme more credibility.
  • True to form and right on cue, long time player – Dr. John Aucott of Johns Hopkins, who has studied chronic Lyme for TWO decades but hasn’t budged the needle an inch, repeats the narrative that ‘long COVID’ has given chronic Lyme more ‘acceptance.’ (You must understand that there’s a lot of grant money for those who ignore the fact the COVID shots are likely behind ‘long COVID. It must also be stated that ‘long COVID’ looks exactly like other post-viral syndromes.) Vaccine injury gets ZERO grant money because our own government and researchers are beholden to Big Pharma. Vaccines are the cash cow of research.
    • The cat is let out of the bag on the final page of the article when it’s stated that the study includes acute Lyme and ‘long COVID’ participants.
      • First, notice that the reason we are hearing the clanging mantra of ‘long COVID’ is because it’s a part of the study. A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.
      • Second, notice that they are ONLY looking at ACUTE Lyme – something that’s been studied ad nauseam.  This research once again omits the sickest patients who never have any research done on them.
    • Thirdly, the cat continues to be let out when it’s stated they are looking for whether a molecule left behind could be driving inflammation.  Right there – they are admitting their bias that this is not a chronic, persistent infection that could be cured or benefitted with anti-microbial treatments.
  • The author is oblivious to the fact that Post-Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome (prolonged symptoms for at least 6 months after treatment) doesn’t include a HUGE subset of patients who were diagnosed and treated late.  This continued regurgitated ignorance is allowing research to be skewed in favor of chronic Lyme only affecting 5-20% of patients – which is a much smaller deal than 40-60%, when those diagnosed and treated late are included.
  • The article repeats a falsehood: that in order to get Lyme one NEEDS to be bitten by a bacteria-carrying tick.  Congenital Lyme has been proven, and there is much to indicate  sexual transmition as well.
  • The reason they ignore anything but ticks is because then they can state their next falsehood, which fits the ‘climate change‘ narrative, which has been proven false by an independent tick researcher.
  • Third falsehood: a 2-4 week course of antibiotics cures the disease.
  • Fourth falsehood: blood tests can help determine if a person has antibodies against the pathogen. Seronegativity has been a big part of the Lyme debate from the beginning.
    • Part of the reason for this is the fact one of the most specific bands for Lyme was taken out of testing at the Dearborn, MI conference because it interfered with vaccine development.
    • Another reason is the fact that arbitrary levels of antibodies have been set, keeping a majority of those infected from ever testing positive.
    • Yet another reason is the fact that there has been a concerted suppression of microscopy  which is considered the gold standard for syphilis diagnostics. Similarly to the attacks on ivermectin and HCQ for COVID, ‘the powers that be’ continue to attack any test other than the CDC 2-tiered test for not being ‘FDA approved,’ even though the CDC test is not ‘approved’ either.
  • Fifth falsehood: there are no treatments that have been proven safe and effective after the initial antibiotics. My husband and I were in intense treatment for over 5 years using multiple antibiotics, among other things, simultaneously. Without this life-saving treatment I wouldn’t be writing this article today.
  • Proving that nobody’s coming around to accept Lyme Disease – read, “Gaslighting and Cults: Our Baffling Relationship With Tick-Borne Diseases,” written this past January, 2025.

This study won’t help chronically infected patients.  Don’t expect anything from this.  It’s the same crap, different day.  

For more:

Until we start OVER, and I mean from square one, research is all tainted and biased.  Don’t believe me?  Listen to Willy himself:

http://

Willy Burgforfer, Ph.D. Lyme Disease ‘Discoverer’

Category:

Activism, Lyme, Testing, Ticks, Transmission, Treatment, Uncategorized

A Masterclass on Tick-Borne Illness: Dr. Burrascano

http://  1 Hour 14 Min

Dr. Joe Burrascano: A Masterclass on Tick-Borne Illness

Jul 16, 2025
Bay Area Lyme Foundation
Dr. Joseph J. Burrascano Jr., a pioneer in the field of Lyme, began his practice in East Hampton, NY, in 1981, where he identified and detailed the clinical aspects of Lyme in a high-prevalence area. Renowned for his groundbreaking diagnostic and treatment guidelines since 1984, he has advised the CDC, NIH, and U.S. Senate, authored extensive publications, and is a founding member of ILADS, continuing to educate globally.
For more:

Category:

Lyme, Testing, Treatment

Expert Briefing on Ticks & Lyme Disease

http://

Expert Briefing on Ticks and Lyme Disease

May 29, 2025

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health experts Nicole Baumgarth and Thomas Hart discuss ticks and the growing threat of Lyme and other tickborne diseases.
Lyme disease is on the rise in the U.S., according to the CDC, mainly in the Northeast, Upper Midwest, and parts of the West. In 2023, state health departments reported more than 89,000 cases of Lyme disease in humans to the CDC, but the actual number of cases is likely much higher due to underreporting and misdiagnosis.
If left untreated, Lyme disease can lead to serious complications affecting the heart, joints, and nervous system. Other tickborne illnesses are also of concern, including Powassan virus and Heartland virus. There is currently no vaccine against tickborne illnesses.
Ticks Pose an Increasing Health Risk https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2025/tic…
Tickborne Diseases Are on the Rise—Here’s What To Know https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2023/lym…
Lyme and Tickborne Diseases Research and Education Institute video    • Lyme and Tickborne Diseases Research and E…  
Ticks Are Dangerous video    • Ticks Are Dangerous  
About Ticks and Tickborne Disease https://www.cdc.gov/ticks/about/index….
Lyme Disease Surveillance and Data https://www.cdc.gov/lyme/data-researc…
Lyme Disease https://www.cdc.gov/lyme/index.html
  • 00:00 Introduction
  • 01:40 What is Lyme disease
  • 04:12 Rates of Lyme disease
  • 9:10 Status of a vaccine
  • 10:30 Tracking infection rates
  • 11:25 Vaccine challenges
  • 13:30 Ubiquity of tick bites
  • 14:45 Diagnosing lesser known tickborne illnesses
  • 16:10 How to improve diagnosis
  • 19:00 Diagnosing illnesses
  • 20:10 This year’s tick season
  • 20:40 Symptoms of Lyme disease
  • 22:10 Other tickborne illnesses
  • 23:20 Dogs and ticks
  • 24:40 Ticks in the environment
  • 25:30 Preventing tick bites

_______________

**COMMENT**

Sadly, researchers continue to slice and dice this complex illness into a singular infection they call ‘Lyme disease,’ when truth be told, patients are often infected with numerous things working synergistically together, making the illness much more complex, harder to identify and treat, and much harder to overcome. So the very name, ‘Lyme disease,’ is inadequate for most patients.

I realize why they do this: due to their very specific work, they must omit variables to conduct research – at least within the current allopathic model of one drug and vaccine, for one disease.  Unfortunately, this is often not what we are dealing with at all in reality.

Category:

Lyme, research, Testing, Ticks, Transmission, vaccines

Mayo Lyme Disease Clap-Trap Part 3

https://www.change.org/p/the-us-senate-calling-for-a-congressional-investigation-of-the-cdc-idsa-and-aldf/u/33714016

Tomorrow’s Cure: New frontiers in Lyme disease detection — just in time for summer (Part 3)

Carl Tuttle
Hudson, NH, United States
Jul 17, 2025

Follow-up email to Dr. Allen Steere, guest speaker from the Mayo Clinic’s “Tomorrow’s Cure” podcast. (Please see part 1 and 2)

Steere’s picture was found here:

https://www.massgeneral.org/doctors/17513/allen-steere

———- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: “asteere@mgh.harvard.edu” <asteere@mgh.harvard.edu>, “cathy@cathywurzer.com” <cathy@cathywurzer.com>, “d.balzer@mayoclinic.org” <d.balzer@mayoclinic.org>
Cc: “newsbureau@mayo.edu” <newsbureau@mayo.edu>, “cwurzer@mpr.org” <cwurzer@mpr.org>, “Pritt.bobbi@mayo.edu” <Pritt.bobbi@mayo.edu>, “tomorrowscure@mayo.edu” <tomorrowscure@mayo.edu>, “mayoclinicnewsnetwork@mayo.edu” <mayoclinicnewsnetwork@mayo.edu>, “genevieve@prx.org” <genevieve@prx.org>, “Secretary@HHS.gov” <Secretary@HHS.gov>, “pam.bondi@usdoj.gov” <pam.bondi@usdoj.gov>
Date: 07/17/2025 7:59 AM EDT
Subject: Re: Tomorrow’s Cure: New frontiers in Lyme disease detection — just in time for summer

Allen Steere, MD, Rheumatologist
Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School
Director of Translational Research in Rheumatology, Massachusetts General Hospital

Dr. Steere,

I would like to call attention to your quote below found on Mayo Clinic’s “Tomorrow’s Cure” podcast page:

“Lyme disease is challenging to detect given its ability to mimic other illnesses or appear asymptomatic altogether. “There may not be specific symptoms when the patient comes in that would tell them this is a vector-borne disease,” said Dr. Steere. “There may be symptoms that we commonly see with infection, or they may also be absent.”  Given this challenge, the development of better diagnostic tools is critical.”

As you know, serology cannot be used to gauge treatment failure or success which makes it the ideal tool for concealing a chronic infection. It sounds to me like serology was the perfect product to support the mantra, “chronic Lyme does not exist.”

It has been 50 years since you discovered Lyme disease in those cluster of children in Lyme, Connecticut and now you are finally admitting we need better tests??

Quote regarding CULTURE for Lyme disease @16:23 into the podcast…

“What we would really like is to have something that is truly associated with the infection itself and of course the best thing is to be able to identify the organism or at least some component of the organism by testing for this particular protein or the organism itself by culturing it which of course is the best way but very difficult to do in Lyme disease once late in the infection.” -Allen Steere

As previously reported, the CDC produced a positive culture in Lyme patient Viki Logan and from the 2018 Middelveen et al study Borrelia burgdorferi were cultured from the blood of seven subjects, from the genital secretions of ten subjects, and from a skin lesion of one subject. The cultures were subjected to corroborative microscopic, histopathological and molecular testing for Borrelia organisms in four independent laboratories in a blinded manner. Cultures from control subjects without Lyme disease were negative for Borrelia using these methods.

These examples are proof of chronic Lyme disease as culture is the gold standard for definitive diagnosis of bacterial and fungal infections worldwide but when it threatens the existing paradigm suddenly it becomes “not particularly useful.”

My Claim: A chronic relapsing seronegative disease does not fit the vaccine model so evidence of persistent infection (following the one-size-fits-all IDSA mandated treatment protocol) must be concealed/ignored at all costs.

Why is this proof of chronic Lyme disease despite extensive antibiotic treatment ignored Dr Steere?  Is the deliberate suppression of this evidence a crime?

A response to this inquiry is requested.

Carl Tuttle
Independent Researcher
Hudson, NH

Cc: Cathy Wurzer, Host

Deb Balzer Mayo Clinic Senior Communications Specialist

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Pam Bondi, US Attorney General

_______________

For more:

Category:

Activism, Lyme, Testing, vaccines

Complaint Against Dr. Paul Gisbert Auwaerter License Number: D0041413

https://www.change.org/p/the-us-senate-calling-for-a-congressional-investigation-of-the-cdc-idsa-and-aldf/u/33656237?

Complaint against Dr. Paul Gisbert Auwaerter License Number: D0041413

Carl Tuttle
Hudson, NH, United States
Jun 27, 2025

Please see the following complaint submitted to the Maryland Board of Physicians along with their response. I followed up in disgust as the disinformation continues year after year decade after decade by the same deceitful individuals who have been propagating the false Lyme disease narrative.

If you agree with my complaint, please voice your concerns by writing to Wes Moore, Governor of Maryland where Dr Paul Auwaerter practices medicine. Reference this Petition Update link and lets flood his inbox with emails! (No matter where you live!!)

governor.mail@maryland.gov

lt.governor@maryland.gov

Picture of Governor Moore found here: https://www.mbp.state.md.us/

———- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: “mdh.mbp_intake@maryland.gov” <mdh.mbp_intake@maryland.gov>
Cc: “oag@oag.state.md.us” <oag@oag.state.md.us>, “cquattrocki@oag.state.md.us” <cquattrocki@oag.state.md.us>, “musa.eubanks@oag.state.md.us” <musa.eubanks@oag.state.md.us>
Date: 06/21/2025 7:56 AM EDT
Subject: Complaint against Dr. Paul Gisbert Auwaerter License Number: D0041413

June 21, 2025

Maryland Board of Physicians
Complaint Intake Unit
4201 Patterson Avenue
Baltimore, MD 21215

Re: Dr. Paul Gisbert Auwaerter, License Number: D0041413

To whom it may concern,

I would like to file a complaint against Dr. Paul Gisbert Auwaerter for propagating false/misleading statements regarding the testing and treatment of tick-borne diseases as there exists a substantial risk of serious harm to public health, safety, and welfare from his misinformation.

Please see the following correspondence with Dr Auwaerter and Medscape’s Editorial Staff regarding the misinformation Auwaerter has been allowed to spread (and viewed by physicians across the country) essentially downplaying the threat of tick-borne disease co-infections while claiming serology for Lyme disease is a “good test.” This deliberate misrepresentation is an ethical concern as Auwaerter, past president of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, is considered an “expert” in the field.

This is not an isolated case. The IDSA has had a history of misinformation; In 2021, the Patient Centered Care Advocacy Group demanded the removal of an inaccurate statement by the IDSA which excluded maternal-fetal transmission of Lyme disease. Congenital transmission was fist described in 1985.

Advocate asks IDSA to remove false statement about Lyme transmission
https://www.lymedisease.org/fries-idsa-remove-false-statements/

Auwaerter was the lead author of the deplorable Lancet Infectious Disease article:

Antiscience and ethical concerns associated with advocacy of Lyme disease
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21867956/

Please consider sending a cease-and-desist letter to Dr. Auwaerter demanding an end to his engaging in this harmful misinformation campaign and require a correction and/or retraction of the statements identified in the correspondence that follows.

A response to this complaint is requested.

Respectfully submitted,

Carl Tuttle
Independent Researcher
Hudson, NH

Cc: Anthony G. Brown, Attorney General
Carolyn A. Quattrocki, Chief Deputy Attorney General
Musa L. Eubanks, Principal Counsel Maryland Department of Health

Correspondence with Dr Auwaerter and Medscape’s Editorial Staff:

———- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: “pauwaert@jhmi.edu” <pauwaert@jhmi.edu>, “pgauwaerter@gmail.com” <pgauwaerter@gmail.com>
Cc: “aaguilar@webmd.net” <aaguilar@webmd.net>, “DFlapan@Medscape.net” <DFlapan@Medscape.net>, “lkane@medscape.net” <lkane@medscape.net>, “gamiller@medscape.net” <gamiller@medscape.net>, “dolmos@webmd.net” <dolmos@webmd.net>, “sarah.wright@webmd.net” <sarah.wright@webmd.net>, “editor2@webmd.net” <editor2@webmd.net>, “mmcnutt@nas.edu” <mmcnutt@nas.edu>, “jliao@nas.edu” <jliao@nas.edu>, “news@medscape.net” <news@medscape.net>
Date: 06/15/2025 12:13 PM EDT
Subject: Medscape: Chronic Lyme Infection-Associated Illness in Urgent Need of Symptom-Targeted Treatments

June 15, 2025

The IDSA Foundation
1300 Wilson Boulevard Suite 300
Arlington, VA 22209
Attn:  Paul Auwaerter, vice chair of the IDSA Foundation

Dr Auwaerter,

I would like to call attention to the following Medscape article referencing the recent National Academies of Sciences review of Lyme disease through a recommendation of the Tick Borne Disease Working Group calling for a review of all the literature.

Medscape Medical News June 10, 2025

Chronic Lyme Infection-Associated Illness in Urgent Need of Symptom-Targeted Treatments
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/chronic-lyme-infection-associated-illness-urgent-need-2025a1000fhv

Regarding laboratory testing…

“The current two-tier serologic testing approach based on the Dearborn criteria has limitations and may not detect all cases of Lyme disease, particularly in patients with early or late disease or those who remain symptomatic after treatment.”

In contrast Dr. Auwaerter you continue to promote serology as a “Good Test” with your recent recorded interview for the so-called “Clinician Toolkit” promoted by the American Medical Association which just so happened to be paid five million dollars to buy into this misinformation through CDC grant#  NU50CK000597

Oct 3, 2024
Improving Care for Patients with Prolonged Symptoms and Concerns about Lyme Disease: A Clinician Toolkit 
https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/public-health/improving-care-patients-prolonged-symptoms-and-concerns-about-lyme

Imbedded recording:

Understanding Lyme Disease with Dr. Paul Auwaerter (@12:30 into the recording)

“If you have symptoms for more than a few weeks it’s a very good test and I think there’s a common misconception it’s not a good test. And what is true is it’s not a good test if you’ve only been infected for a week or two because the body hasn’t mounted enough time to develop antibodies. But if people have had symptoms for three, four weeks or longer, it is a good blood test to help assess these later symptoms that could be neurologic, muscular, skeletal, or occasionally cardiac.” – Paul Auwaerter

Serology is so unreliable that in 2013 Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell signed HB1933 into law requiring healthcare providers to notify those tested that current laboratory testing can produce false negatives.

Governor Chris Sununu’s 2020-2021 commission to study diagnostic testing for Lyme disease concluded that the FDA approved two-tier serologic immunoassay for Lyme was not reliable in all stages of disease; no better than a coin toss.

Peer-reviewed evidence of “Seronegativity in Lyme borreliosis and Other Spirochetal Infections” 16 September 2003
https://www.dropbox.com/s/3d6m45jzlhhwalu/Seronegativity.pdf?dl=0

And yet Dr. Auwaerter you continue to promote serology as a “good test”

Furthermore, you refused to answer my inquiry regarding your Medscape commentary of Oct 2023

Medscape COMMENTARY

New Federal Oversight of Lab Developed Tests
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/997365

Excerpt:

“I often see patients who are concerned they might have Lyme disease, or they’ve been told by other physicians that they have a tickborne or multiple infections. I’ve had patients who claim to have five or six infections: Lyme disease, Babesia, Bartonella, Mycoplasma, or Epstein-Barr virus. They bring LDT results from outside laboratories, which often have a proviso that these tests are only for research or educational purposes. Yet, they purport finding analytes (antibodies or proteins) that suggest the patient has an active infection. These patients may have been treated but are not improving, so they are referred to me.” – Paul Auwaerter

Carl Tuttle’s Inquiry: (which remains unanswered and posted to that commentary)

Dr. Auwaerter… I would like to call attention to the following 2009 tick study conducted here in New Hampshire:
 
Correlation between Tick Density and Pathogen Endemicity, New Hampshire
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2671416/
 
The study found deer ticks were carrying multiple pathogens (co-infections) that could be transmitted in a single bite.
 
What FDA approved Tick-Borne Disease Panel are you recommending so as not to miss any of these infections?
 
A response to this inquiry is requested.
 
Carl Tuttle
Hudson, NH
___________________

Dr. Auwaerter,

Are you aware of the following announcement? IGeneX is finding those “multiple infections” you claim do not exist….

IGeneX Lyme ImmunoBlot test kit receives FDA clearance
https://www.lymedisease.org/lyme-immunoblot-fda-clearance/

GETTING STARTED WITH IGENEX
https://igenex.com/wp-content/uploads/getting-started-with-igenex.pdf

A 2018 study of 10,000+ patient samples from nearly every state:
 
37.3% were positive for Babesia species
32.1% for Lyme Borrelia
27.7% for TBRF Borrelia
19.1% for Bartonella
16.7% for Anaplasma
12.8% for Rickettsia
6.9% for Ehrlichia

Co-infections:

40% tested positive for two pathogens
15% tested positive for three pathogens
4.6% tested positive for four pathogens
0.7% tested positive for five pathogens

What is going on here Dr. Auwaerter? Are you completely uninformed or deliberately promoting misinformation? Will you be correcting/retracting your statements?

A response to this inquiry is requested.

Carl Tuttle
Independent Researcher
Hudson, NH

Cc: MEDSCAPE EDITORIAL STAFF
Marcia McNutt, President of the National Academy of Sciences and Chair of the National Research Council
Send comments and news tips to news@medscape.net

_________________________________________________________________

To the Maryland Board of Physicians:

Additional complaints against Auwaerter:
 
1. The Mayday Project Responds to Dr. Paul Auwaerter’s Defense of IDSA Guidelines for Lyme Disease
https://www.webwire.com/ViewPressRel.asp?aId=192558

2. Hopkins Physician Says Lyme Disease Patients Create Conspiracy Theories About Their Illnesses
https://www.webwire.com/ViewPressRel.asp?aId=197392

3. Mothers Against Lyme Calls for Retraction of False Information on Congenital Lyme in IDSA, AAN, ACR Guidelines
Retraction request cites harm to pregnant women and children
https://www.webwire.com/ViewPressRel.asp?aId=281005

4. Detailed patient experience because of the false information (Please read)
https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=30451510191160844

Excerpt:

“I’ve tried explaining this a few times and I won’t stop until people get it. This isn’t like cancer or any other disease where I can go to a Dr that’s covered by my insurance and receive treatment. What is happening here is criminal and if you don’t believe me, ask ANYONE with Lyme.”

Response from the Maryland State Board of Physicians

———- Original Message ———-
From: MDH mbp_intake -MDH- <mdh.mbp_intake@maryland.gov>
To: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
Date: 06/26/2025 11:09 AM EDT
Subject: Re: Complaint against Dr. Paul Gisbert Auwaerter License Number: D0041413

Good morning, Mr. Tuttle:

Please see the attached.

Thank you,
Intake Unit
Maryland State Board of Physicians

The Board of Physicians is committed to customer service.  Please visit https://www.doit.state.md.us/selectsurvey/TakeSurvey.aspx?agencycode=MBP&SurveyID=86M2956 to take our Customer Satisfaction Survey.

My reply to the Maryland State Board of Physicians:

———- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: MDH mbp_intake -MDH- <mdh.mbp_intake@maryland.gov>, “jennifer.saylor-florio@maryland.gov” <jennifer.saylor-florio@maryland.gov>
Cc: “Harbhajan.Ajrawat@maryland.gov” <Harbhajan.Ajrawat@maryland.gov>, “Christine.Farrelly@maryland.gov” <Christine.Farrelly@maryland.gov>, “hajrawat@gmail.com” <hajrawat@gmail.com>, “oag@oag.state.md.us” <oag@oag.state.md.us>, “cquattrocki@oag.state.md.us” <cquattrocki@oag.state.md.us>, “governor.mail@maryland.gov” <governor.mail@maryland.gov>, “lt.governor@maryland.gov” <lt.governor@maryland.gov>
Date: 06/27/2025 8:31 AM EDT
Subject: Re: Complaint against Dr. Paul Gisbert Auwaerter License Number: D0041413

Intake Unit
Maryland State Board of Physicians,
via   <jennifer.saylor-florio@maryland.gov>

Dr. Saylor-Florio,

I would like to call attention to the following statement found in the attached response to my complaint against Dr Paul Auwaerter:

“The Board of Physicians is responsible for assuring that licensed physicians and allied health practitioners render competent medical care to the citizens of Maryland”

Isn’t that statement a bit hypocritical when you allow a physician to claim serology for Lyme disease is a “good test” when in fact it is no better than a coin toss while using his position of authority as past president of the IDSA to propagate that falsehood?

I question the credibility of this medical board willing to turn a blind eye to Auwaerter’s misleading statements. How could he possibly provide competent medical care believing that serology is a good test while tick-borne co-infections are of little concern? The potential for harm or negative outcomes is substantial and noteworthy.

Carl Tuttle
Independent researcher
Hudson, NH

Cc: Harbhajan Ajrawat, M.D. Chair
Anthony G. Brown, Attorney General
Carolyn A. Quattrocki, Chief Deputy Attorney General
Wes Moore, Governor
Aruna Miller Lt Governor

_______________

**Comment**

I find it quite telling that the Maryland Board of Physicians claims it does not have legal authority to investigate Dr. Auwaerter’s patently false statements about Lyme testing.  State Boards over Physicians had no trouble whatsoever investigating and persecuting any doctor during COVID who advocated for treatments (ivermectin, HCQ, vitamins, etc.) other than what the top-down accepted narrative had to offer (ventilators, remdesivir, the clot shot, etc), or whom questioned the clot shot gene therapy which was touted as ‘safe and effective,” like a mantra.

Do not expect justice from these ‘professional’ medical groups.

They are on the wrong side of the fence.

For More:

Category:

Activism, Lyme, Testing