Archive for the ‘research’ Category

Bartonella Neuroretinitis From a Ferret and Guinea Pig

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33083230/

Not cat-scratch disease: Bartonella henselae neuroretinitis associated with non-feline pet mammals

Affiliations expand

Free PMC article

Abstract

To describe the ocurrence of Bartonella-associated neuroretinitis secondary to non-feline pet exposure, we retrospectively reviewed medical records and imaging from patients with a clinical and serologic diagnosis of Bartonella henselae (BH). Retinal imaging included color fundus photography, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fluorescein angiography (FA). Four eyes of two patients with cat-scratch disease were included in this study, with a mean age of 35 years. The mean follow-up was 13 months, after presentation of infectious neuroretinitis. Both patients suffered from bilateral neuroretinitis after direct contact with family pets (ferret and guinea pig).

All patients were treated with a long-term systemic antimicrobial therapy.

Visual acuity in all improved to 20/30 or better at six months. In conclusion, humans may develop cat-scratch disease when they are exposed to Bartonella henselae (BH) in the saliva of infected cats or BH-containing flea feces reaching the systemic circulation through scratches or mucous membranes. As the cat flea (Ctenocephalides felis) may reside on non-feline mammals, Bartonella-associated neuroretinitis may result from contact with other furred family pets.

___________________

For more on neuroretinitis:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/07/10/bartonella-henselae-neuroretinitis-in-patients-without-cat-scratch/  All the patients denied a history of a cat or any animal contact, or of having CSD findings.

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/07/12/bartonella-neuroretinitis/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/04/08/case-series-bartonella-ocular-manifestations/

For more on Bartonella:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/category/bartonella-treatment/

Excerpt:

Fifteen species of gram-negative aerobic Bartonella are known to infect humans; however Dr. Ricardo Maggi’s statement is quite telling, “This case reinforces the hypothesis that any Bartonella species can cause human infection.”  

Clinical Manifestations Associated with Bartonella Henselae Infection in a Tropical Region

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33021197/

Clinical Manifestations Associated with Bartonella henselae Infection in a Tropical Region

Affiliations expand

Abstract

Bartonella henselae is a zoonotic Gram-negative Bacillus associated with self-limited regional lymphadenopathy. In recent decades, an expanding spectrum of clinical manifestations has been described, in part, due to improved diagnostics. However, updated epidemiological data are sparse. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical features of 31 patients with B. henselae infection older than 15 years from 2005 to 2019, in the tropical Top End of Australia. Our annual disease incidence of 1.3 cases per 100,000 population is lower than that in the national database surveillances in the United States, but the hospitalization incidence of 0.9 per 100,000 population in our region is higher than those reported in the literature, with an average length of stay of 9 days. Patients were more commonly male, aboriginal, and aged less than 14 years (median age: 7 years), living in a rural setting with presentation during our monsoon season.

The disease spectrum included:

  • lymph node disease (74%)
  • organ peliosis
  • endocarditis
  • cutaneous lesions
  • parapharyngeal abscess
  • parotitis
  • neurologic and ocular syndromes

Lymph node disease was far commoner in children than the more serious systemic B. henselae infections associated with adults (P = 0.074).

Although no deaths were reported, significant morbidities were observed. Two endocarditis cases presented with glomerulonephritis, and hematological and neurological features mimicking vasculitis, and consequently received immunosuppressants. One case was only diagnosed after representation with serial embolic strokes.

Given the heterogeneity of disease manifestations with nonspecific symptoms and significant consequences, a timely and accurate diagnosis is needed to avoid unnecessary treatments or interventions.

___________________

**Comment**

Please note the endocarditis, which we are told is “rare” with Lyme disease. Bartonella can also bethe causative agent, which many doctors are also not looking for or educated on.

Bartonella mimicking vasculitis has also been seen:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/07/03/case-of-cerebral-vasculitis-due-to-neurobartonellosis/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/01/05/bartonella-endocarditis-masquerading-as-systemic-vasculitis-with-rapidly-progressive-glomerulonephritis/

The HPV vaccine has also caused vasculitis:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/02/16/gardasil-vasculitis-msids/

Study Shows D, Magnesium, and B12 Reduces Clinical Deterioration in Older COVID-19 Patients

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899900720303002

Cohort study to evaluate effect of vitamin D, magnesium, and vitamin B12 in combination on severe outcome progression in older patients with coronavirus (COVID-19)

 

Highlights

  • Use of a combination of vitamin D, magnesium, and vitamin B12 (DMB) in patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) was studied.
  • Fewer patients ≥50 y of age with COVID-19 on DMB suffered clinical deterioration.
  • Further studies are warranted to ascertain the full benefit of DMB in patients with COVID-19.

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to determine clinical outcomes of older patients with coronavirus (COVID-19) who received a combination of vitamin D, magnesium, and vitamin B12 (DMB) compared with those who did not. We hypothesized that fewer patients administered this combination would require oxygen therapy, intensive care support, or a combination of both than those who did not.

Methods

This was a cohort observational study of all consecutive hospitalized patients ≥50 y of age with COVID-19 in a tertiary academic hospital. Before April 6, 2020, no patients received the (DMB) combination. After this date, patients were administered 1000 IU/d oral vitamin D3, 150 mg/d oral magnesium, and 500 mcg/d oral vitamin B12 upon admission if they did not require oxygen therapy. Primary outcome was deterioration leading to any form of oxygen therapy, intensive care support, or both.

Results

Between January 15 and April 15, 2020, we identified 43 consecutive patients ≥50 y of age with COVID-19. Seventeen patients received DMB before onset of primary outcome and 26 patients did not. Baseline demographic characteristics between the two groups were significantly different by age. In univariate analysis, age and hypertension had a significant influence on outcome. After adjusting for age or hypertension separately in a multivariate analysis, the intervention group retained protective significance. Fewer treated patients than controls required initiation of oxygen therapy during hospitalization (17.6 vs 61.5%, P = 0.006). DMB exposure was associated with odds ratios of 0.13 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03–0.59) and 0.20 (95% CI, 0.04–0.93) for oxygen therapy, intensive care support, or both on univariate and multivariate analyses, respectively.

Conclusions

A vitamin D / magnesium / vitamin B12 combination in older COVID-19 patients was associated with a significant reduction in the proportion of patients with clinical deterioration requiring oxygen support, intensive care support, or both. This study supports further larger randomized controlled trials to ascertain the full benefit of this combination in ameliorating the severity of COVID-19.

__________________

**Comment**

Once again we see there are numerous things that can be used successfully against COVID-19, but don’t expect to hear about this in main stream media.  They are all about pushing products that our public ‘authorities’ have financial interests in.  One is a dangerous, experimental vaccine:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/08/29/every-breath-you-take-every-move-you-make-the-who-is-watching-you-the-media-is-bought-out-by-gates/

We’ve been warned about this vaccine:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/10/20/experts-issue-serious-warnings-about-a-covid-vaccine/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/10/05/covid-19-vaccine-explained/

And another is the expensive anti-viral Remdesivir which has recently been given EUA status despite lack of results:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/10/26/remdesivir-gets-fda-approval-but-who-says-drug-ineffective-for-covid/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/07/02/remdesivir-for-covid-19-not-backed-by-results/

For more successful COVID-19 treatments that doctors have been using successfully:

 

 

Low Zinc Levels Associated with Poor COVID Outcomes

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.10.07.20208645v1

Low zinc levels at clinical admission associates with poor outcomes in COVID-19

Marina Vogel, Marc Tallo-Parra, Victor Herrera-Fernandez, Gemma Perez-Vilaro, Miguel Chillon, Xavier Nogues, Silvia Gomez-Zorrilla, Inmaculada Lopez-Montesinos, Judit Villar, Maria Luisa Sorli-Redo, Juan Pablo Horcajada, Natalia Garcia-Giralt, Julio Pascual, Juana Diez, Ruben Vicente, Robert Guerri-Fernandez
 

Abstract

Background: Biomarkers to predict Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) outcome early at infection are urgently needed to improve prognosis and treatment. Zinc balances immune responses and also has a proven direct antiviral action against some viruses. Importantly, zinc deficiency (ZD) is a common condition in elderly and individuals with chronic diseases, two groups with more severe COVID-19 outcomes. We hypothesize that serum zinc content (SZC) influences COVID-19 disease progression and thus might represent a useful biomarker.

Methods: We run a retrospective observational study with 249 COVID-19 patients admitted in Hospital del Mar. We have studied COVID-19 severity and progression attending to SZC at admission. In parallel we have studied SARS-CoV2 replication in the Vero E6 cell line modifying zinc concentrations.

Findings: Our study demonstrates a correlation between serum zinc levels and COVID-19 outcome. Serum zinc levels lower than 50 mcgg/dl at admission correlated with worse clinical presentation, longer time to reach stability and higher mortality. Our in vitro results indicate that low zinc levels favor viral expansion in SARS-CoV2 infected cells.

Interpretation: SZC is a novel biomarker to predict COVID-19 outcome. We encourage performing randomized clinical trials to study zinc supplementation as potential prophylaxis and treatment with people at risk of zinc deficiency.

_____________________

**Comment**

While this is awaiting peer review, it’s not a novel concept nor is it surprising; however, our public ‘authorities’ would rather rivet on mask wearing (which doesn’t work and gives a false sense of security), their expensive antiviral Remdesivir (which has been shown to be of little to no benefit), and their expensive, experimental vaccine (which has caused all sorts of side-effects already in human volunteers). 

The best and safest approach is always prevention.

Please learn all you can on how to make your body a tough target for disease.  Start by eating a whole-food diet, reducing your stress, getting adequate sleep, and exercising.  Then, work with your medical practitioner to determine your imbalances/weaknesses and appropriately supplement using reputable products.

Caution:  zinc is a fat-soluble vitamin and will build up in the body.  Testing is needed to determine your level and how much to take.  

For a great read on all things vitamin D including how much to take, various important nuances, and necessary testing:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/03/12/the-importance-of-vitamin-d-k-and-magnesium-for-lyme-msids-patients/

For a great presentation:  

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/04/16/viruses-immunity-dr-waters-fix-your-soil-and-the-seeds-cant-grow/

These simple nutritional issues are what our ‘authorities’ should be educating the public on.  The fact that they aren’t doing so reveals their true motive.

A Case of Borrelia Miyamotoi

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMcpc2004996?

Case 32-2020: A 63-Year-Old Man with Confusion, Fatigue, and Garbled Speech

Authors:  Shibani S. Mukerji, M.D., Ph.D., Kevin L. Ard, M.D., Pamela W. Schaefer, M.D., and John A. Branda, M.D.

The following was obtained from the case presented in the link above in the New England Journal of Medicine.A 63-year-old retired government employee who lived with his wife in northern New England had recently traveled to Florida and to rural Canada to hunt was evaluated at the hospital because of:

  • fever
  • confusion
  • headache
  • garbled speech
  • fatigue
  • vision changes & floaters
  • lymphocytic pleocytosis
  • elevated protein level in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)
  • worsening proteinuria and hypertension
  • flash of light accompanied by transient sharp pain in the left retro-orbital area and forehead, with monocular blurry vision
  • garbled and nonsensical speech with impaired comprehension
  • word-finding difficulty
  • photophobia
  • sonophobia
  • staring spells that lasted for 1 minute
  • low-grade fever 
  • somnolence
  • generalized weakness
  • unsteadiness
  • mild neck stiffness
  • unintentional weight loss of 10 kg in the past 6 months
  • nocturia
  • cachectic appearing
  • perseverative thoughts
  • unable to name days of the week backward
  • when asked to remember three words, he could recall only one word after 5 minutes
  • he reported that nine quarters equaled $4.25
  • dilated-eye examination revealed edema in both optic nerves

Interestingly, after IV acyclovir, ceftriaxone, ampicillin, vancomycin, and thiamine, he developed myoclonic jerks with marked lethargy, and the photophobia, and nonsensical speech persisted. He was intermittently impulsive and uncooperative. After 4 days of IV treatment he reported feeling better and having increased strength, allowing him to walk. On the fifth hospital day, he was calm and cooperative; oriented to person, place, and time; and able to follow complex commands.

Administration of broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents resulted in rapid improvement in his clinical condition within days despite increasing neurologic symptoms over the course of several months, findings that suggested meningoencephalitis.  Despite an extensive evaluation for likely causes of meningoencephalitis, a definitive diagnosis was not established. This patient’s presentation and clinical course are emblematic of challenges faced by clinicians, given that the causative agent in meningoencephalitis is identified in only 30 to 60% of cases, despite extensive and invasive testing.1,2

There are three important clinical features of this patient’s presentation:

  • uveitis associated with meningoencephalitis
  • subacute cognitive decline
  • clinical improvement after the administration of antimicrobial therapy

A unique feature of this patient’s presentation is his exposure to rituximab, a humanized chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that causes B-cell depletion. The effects of rituximab should be considered when interpreting the results of IgG and IgM serologic tests. This concern is relevant to testing for West Nile virus infection and eastern equine encephalitis, both of which can cause neuroinvasive viral encephalitis and are endemic in the northeastern United States. The antibody response during these infections can be delayed or absent in patients with B-cell depletion.4,5 Such a response may also occur in Powassan virus infection, an emerging cause of viral meningoencephalitis in the United States that is transmitted by ticks.6

A key question remains: What pathogen can cause uveitis and meningoencephalitis and result in rapid clinical improvement after the administration of vancomycin, ampicillin, ceftriaxone, and acyclovir?

The authors point out that spirochete infections can cause uveitis and meningoencephalitis.

Due to the patient’s history of living in an endemic area for tick-borne diseases, is an avid hunter, whose condition improved dramatically after IV antibiotics, infection with borrelia species seemed a logical diagnosis.

The authors point out the problem with testing:

Testing for Lyme disease occurs as a part of a two-tiered algorithm and measures a person’s antibody response to the spirochete. Whether treatment with rituximab delays formation of antibodies in blood and CSF is unknown, thus complicating the interpretation of this patient’s serologic test results.

They further state that those with neurological Lyme infection often have abnormal imaging findings of the head or spine but that this patient had neither.

Then they state that B. miyamotoi, another borrelia species, causes a symptom complex that is consistent with this patient and that there are two case reports of meningoencephalitis in immunocompromised patients receiving rituximab, where B. miyamotoi was the causative agent.  These patients received rituximab for hematologic cancers, and in both, Wright-Giemsa staining of CSF showed spirochetes, and a definitive diagnosis of B. miyamotoi infection was made based on nucleic acid testing of the blood.

The authors state the patient’s recurrent fever but lack of rash also support a B. miyamotoi infection, but that the opthalmologic findings do not.  They admit; however, that there is limited understanding of B. miyamotoi but since other spirochetes can cause eye issues, B. miyamotoi is likely no different. ( I must add here that I know many Lyme disease patients who get recurrent fevers and have never seen a rash.  This is a perfect example of how researchers and doctors have falsely pigeon-holed Lyme symptoms into a box of their own making).  For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/02/22/why-mainstream-lyme-msids-research-remains-in-the-dark-ages/

Regarding testing, a lumbar puncture targeting the glpQ gene of borrelia that causes relapsing fever, which is absent in Lyme disease, was positive. Serum showed strong reactivity on the ELISA that detects IgG antibodies directed against the GlpQ protein of B. miyamotoi.  Corresponding IgM ELISA was negative, consistent of B. miyamotoi infection of several months duration.

Unfortunately there are no randomized controlled trials and no formal treatment recommendations.  Patients typically receive Lyme disease treatment.  An in vitro study showed B. miyamotoi was susceptible to doxycycline, azithromycin, and ceftriaxone but not amoxicillin. (Again, I must add that current Lyme disease treatment advocated by the CDC/IDSA only works for a small percentage of patients and that studies from the beginning have shown treatment failures using their approach.  For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2016/02/13/lyme-disease-treatment/)

The patient was sent home with 4 weeks of IV ceftriaxone but developed a facial rash and was switched to doxycycline.  After 3 weeks all symptoms had resolved but the blurry vision which improved slowly over 3 months.

This patient should be followed up for years, but won’t be.
And the question begging to be asked is: how many people with B. miyamotoi are falling through the cracks?  It isn’t even reportable to the CDC yet (which notoriously undercounts all things tick-borne-related).

For more:  https://igenex.com/tick-talk/what-you-need-to-know-about-borrelia-miyamotoi/

This article points out the confusion with B. miyamotoi: 

  • many separate it from other tick-borne relapsing fevers
  • while it can cause relapsing fevers, it sometimes doesn’t
  • it appears to be the only TBRF transmitted from a hard bodied tick, unlike TBRF which is mainly transmitted from a soft bodied tick (I remain skeptical of this as ticks have repeatedly been found to transmit things they shouldn’t – just like they are found in places they shouldn’t be.)
  • symptoms often resemble Lyme disease
  • you can be infected with BOTH B. miyamotoi AND Lyme disease (as well as numerous other coinfections) which will complicate symptom presentation
  • testing for B. miyamotoi is just as abysmal as it is for Lyme/MSIDS:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/03/01/study-cdcs-2-tier-lyme-testing-inaccurate-in-more-than-70-of-cases/