Archive for the ‘Heart Issues’ Category

Government Commissioned Report: Pfizer and Moderna mRNA Shots Cause Myocarditis

https://www.dossier.today/p/biden-admin-commissioned-report-concludes?

Biden Admin-commissioned report concludes Pfizer & Moderna mRNA shots cause myocarditis

An exhaustive review of the evidence establishes a causal relationship between mRNA shots and myocarditis.

JORDAN SCHACHTEL
APR 17, 2024

Important article excerpts:

A new report published this week from the National Academies concluded that there is a direct relationship between COVID-19 vaccines and myocarditis, a disease that causes inflammation of the heart muscle.

The report, titled, Evidence Review of the Adverse Effects of COVID-19 Vaccination and Intramuscular Vaccine Administration (2024), marks the first time that a government commissioned report has acknowledged the direct association between Pfizer and Moderna’s mRNA shots and myocarditis.

The 314 page report concluded that there was insufficient evidence to demonstrate a causal relationship (a direct cause and effect) for a variety of potential harms, but did conclude that there is a direct causal link between the mRNA shots and myocarditis.

Now, the report only studies myocarditis resulting from the *first two mRNA Covid shot doses.* This report does not even get into the potential negative implications of the endless booster shot protocol, though it does cite studies that show there is a substantially increased risk of acquiring myocarditis from dose one to dose two.

Nonetheless, in February of this year, the CDC’s vaccine review panel authorized the ninth mRNA dose for loyal Followers of the Science.  (See link for article)

For more:

Category:

Heart Issues, vaccines

VAERS: High Risk of Myocarditis & Pericarditis After Dose 2 & 3 But CDC Kills Alert Warning

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/novel-methodology-for-vaers-analysis?

Novel Robust Methodology for VAERS Analysis Reveals Very High Risk of Myocarditis and Pericarditis Following Dose 2 and Dose 3: #PathogenicPriming

Risk found of people under 30 is especially a concern because it was so rarely seen prior to 2021.

 
JAMES LYONS-WEILER
APR 11, 2024

A new study published in the Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine by Daoyuan Lai and colleagues, a team of researchers from the University of Hong Kong, has made significant strides in understanding the safety of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, particularly in relation to myocarditis risk after vaccination. The study may also represent a watershed moment in the methodology used to assess causality using VAERS data.

The study, which focuses on the rare but concerning risk of myocarditis following the administration of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, introduces a novel approach to analyzing vaccine safety data that could transform how we monitor vaccine adverse events.

The study analyzed data from the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a resource that has been used to monitor post-vaccination adverse events. Recognizing the limitations of data in VAERS, including potential underreporting and the absence of a control group, the team employed a modified version of the Self-Controlled Case Series (SCCS) method. This innovative approach allowed for more accurate detection and quantification of myocarditis risk following the second and third doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

Key Findings:

  • The research identified an increased risk of myocarditis within the 1- to 3-day period following the second and third doses of both the Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) and Moderna (mRNA-1273) vaccines.

  • Following the second dose, the relative incidence of myocarditis was 4.89 for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine and 2.86 for the Moderna vaccine. The risk increased following the third dose, with a relative incidence of 9.04 for Pfizer-BioNTech and 4.71 for Moderna.

  • A similar increased risk of myocarditis was observed among individuals aged below 30.  (See link for article)

______________

https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/cdc-killed-alert-warning-of-connection-between-heart-inflammation-and-mrna-vaccines-facts-matter  Video Here

CDC Killed Alert Warning of Connection Between Heart Inflammation and mRNA Vaccines 

Facts Matter
Jan-18-2024
 
In America is something called the Health Alert Network. It’s a national program run by the CDC in order to provide health alerts to the American public, when necessary.
And so, every once in a while, I’m sure that you’ve seen the headlines warning us about certain drug recalls, salmonella outbreaks, dangerous chemicals being found in consumer products, disease outbreaks in certain areas—all of these alerts from the CDC get disseminated to the broader populace via the Health Alert Network.
Once an alert goes out, over 1 million federal, state, and local politicians, doctors, laboratories, universities, news media—basically everyone in the country gets alerted.
However, even though the Health Alert Network is routinely used to inform the public when adverse reactions to a drug are discovered, during the years of the pandemic, there was something that (notably) never happened.
Even though serious heart inflammation was discovered to be a side-effect of the mRNA-based vaccines — this fact was never relayed through the alert system. And it was always a bit of a mystery as to why.
A mystery that, as of yesterday, has only deepened: because we here at The Epoch Times were able to successfully get our hands on internal CDC documents which showed that all the way back in May of 2021, the CDC had actually drafted a full alert regarding myocarditis, but for some reason, they never sent it out.
Oops.
 
Go here for the timeline: COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ & Myocarditis
  • 9/22/20: CDC identifies myocarditis as an adverse event of special interest.
  • 10/30/20  FDA identifies myocarditis as an adverse event of special interest.
  • 12/20 Case of pericarditis reported to VAERS
  • 2021: Myocarditis cases spike in the military
  • 1/21: 28 cases of myocarditis, pericarditis, or myopericarditis reported to VAERS
  • 1/21 First military member experiences postvax myocarditis according to a published study 
  • 1/21 First cases of postvax myocarditis recorded in Israel
  • 2/21 64 cases of myocarditis, pericarditis, or myopericarditis reported to VAERS, including 2 deaths
  • 2/21 Israeli teen hospitalized with myocarditis after Pfizer shot
  • 2/18+19/21 Safety signal for myocarditis triggered in VAERS using two different methods
  • 2/28/21 Israeli officials privately alert CDC to large number of reports of myocarditis, particularly in young people following the Pfizer shot
  • 2/28/21 Israeli officials privately alert the European Medicines Agency to the post-vax myocarditis cases
  • 2/28/21 57 cases of myocarditis or pericarditis within 7 days 
  • 3/21 54 cases of myocarditis, pericarditis of myopericarditis reported to VAERS

And so on and so forth.  It only gets worse…..but you can see that they knew from the beginning the shots caused heart damage and chose to keep it hidden.

Category:

Heart Issues, vaccines, Viruses

Lyme-Induced Cardiac Problems Persist Despite Antibiotic Treatment

https://danielcameronmd.com/lyme-cardiac-antibiotic-treatment/

LYME-INDUCED CARDIAC PROBLEMS PERSIST DESPITE ANTIBIOTIC TREATMENT

lyme-cardiac

In their article, “An Unusual Presentation of Lyme Carditis and Adenosine-Sensitive Atrioventricular Block,” Alexandre and colleagues present the case of a 20-year-old female with Lyme disease and cardiac manifestations, who continued to experience cardiac problems despite 4 weeks of antibiotic treatment. [1]

By 

The young woman was admitted to the emergency department with acute pleuritic chest pain and shortness of breath. (Pleuritic chest pain is characterized by sudden and intense sharp, stabbing, or burning pain in the chest when inhaling and exhaling.)

The woman exhibited only mild tachycardia (100/min). However, “Considering the suspicion of acute myocarditis, the patient was admitted to an intensive cardiac care unit,” the authors state.

During hospitalization, cardiac monitoring revealed several asymptomatic episodes of paroxysmal AV block, including second-degree Mobitz I AV block, second degree AV block, and high-grade AV block.

Although there was no evidence of tick exposure or skin lesions, clinicians ordered testing for Lyme disease, which was positive by Western blot. “… an IgM Western-Blot test was performed, confirming positivity and recent Borrelia spp. infection.”

The patient was diagnosed with Lyme disease with cardiac manifestations of high-grade AV block. She was treated with a 4-week course of IV ceftriaxone, which led to a complete resolution of chest pain and shortness of breath.

However, the AV conduction disturbance continued after 4 weeks of antibiotic treatment. And subsequently, the woman was given an alternative diagnosis of extrinsic idiopathic paroxysmal AV block (“adenosine-sensitive AV block”).

This could be an extremely rare course of Lyme carditis, or the patient may have had asymptomatic AV conduction problems that surfaced when she developed Lyme disease, according to the authors.

“The patient was started on theophylline 400 mg twice daily, and after one week of treatment, the Holter monitoring demonstrated a significant reduction in AV conduction disturbances,” the authors state.

At her 18-month follow-up appointment, the woman continued to have fewer AV conduction disturbances, no cardiac complaints, and no need for a permanent pacemaker.

Authors conclude:

“This case illustrates a challenging scenario of [Lyme carditis] with high grade AV block, which persisted after appropriate antibiotic treatment and had key features supporting the diagnosis of extrinsic idiopathic paroxysmal AV block (‘adenosine sensitive AV block’).

References:
  1. Alexandre A, Ribeiro D, Sousa MJ, Reis H, Silveira J, Torres S. An Unusual Presentation of Lyme Carditis and Adenosine-Sensitive Atrioventricular Block. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2024 Jan;121(1):e20230228. Portuguese, English. doi: 10.36660/abc.20230228. PMID: 38324857.

For more:

Category:

Heart Issues, Lyme, research, Testing, Treatment, Uncategorized

The Not So Little Paper That Starts the ‘Vaccine’ War Promptly Retracted

http://

Dr. Boz Comes Clean For Recommending COVID Shots

The Biggest Crime in the History of Medicine

Dr. Annette Bozworth, a Florida internal medicine doctor with over a half million subscribers on Youtube, combs through the Mead analysis presented below. She nervously admits being wrong about recommending the gene therapy shots to all her patients and loved ones, which she herself got. Her fans have been writing in for over two years about their injuries and she admits she has been avoiding addressing it, but can no longer, and that they were right all along.

It’s quite obvious she had a difficult time swallowing the red pill & that she is now living with regret.

Hopefully, she will not do an about-face once she learns the highly read and cited peer-reviewed paper calling for a halt in the COVID shots has been retracted which violates COPE Guidelines.

The study authors intend to publish the study in an alternate journal.

Perhaps more doctors who urged their patients to get the clot shots who are now living with regret will be forthcoming.  After all, it is estimated that 17 MILLION globally have died after getting them.

Who will be brave enough to admit ‘The Emperor has no clothes on?’

Make sure and watch this short 11 minute video where Steve Kirsch also got 2 COVID shots for ‘extra’ protection, and ‘sold the whole narrative’ until he too had a red pill moment after he started hearing scores of horror stories of perfectly healthy people dying or having heart attacks shortly after getting the shots. Kirsch dove into VAERS data (which only has a 1% capture rate) proving these shots have caused more adverse reactions and death than any other vaccine in history.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38274635/

COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign

M Nathaniel Mead 1, Stephanie Seneff 2, Russ Wolfinger 3, Jessica Rose 4, Kris Denhaerynck 5, Steve Kirsch 6, Peter A McCullough 7 8 

Free PMC article

Abstract

Our understanding of COVID-19 vaccinations and their impact on health and mortality has evolved substantially since the first vaccine rollouts. Published reports from the original randomized phase 3 trials concluded that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines could greatly reduce COVID-19 symptoms. In the interim, problems with the methods, execution, and reporting of these pivotal trials have emerged. Re-analysis of the Pfizer trial data identified statistically significant increases in serious adverse events (SAEs) in the vaccine group. Numerous SAEs were identified following the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), including death, cancer, cardiac events, and various autoimmune, hematological, reproductive, and neurological disorders. Furthermore, these products never underwent adequate safety and toxicological testing in accordance with previously established scientific standards. Among the other major topics addressed in this narrative review are the published analyses of serious harms to humans, quality control issues and process-related impurities, mechanisms underlying adverse events (AEs), the immunologic basis for vaccine inefficacy, and concerning mortality trends based on the registrational trial data. The risk-benefit imbalance substantiated by the evidence to date contraindicates further booster injections and suggests that, at a minimum, the mRNA injections should be removed from the childhood immunization program until proper safety and toxicological studies are conducted. Federal agency approval of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines on a blanket-coverage population-wide basis had no support from an honest assessment of all relevant registrational data and commensurate consideration of risks versus benefits. Given the extensive, well-documented SAEs and unacceptably high harm-to-reward ratio, we urge governments to endorse a global moratorium on the modified mRNA products until all relevant questions pertaining to causality, residual DNA, and aberrant protein production are answered.

____________

**UPDATE**

I highly recommend watching immunologist Dr. Jessica Rose break down the 1.6 Million and counting adverse event reports in VAERS, showing definitive evidence of causality.  It is the most downloaded paper on Cureus with one of the highest SIQ scores, which is essentially a peer-review process after publishing, yet was promptly retracted even after going through the standard peer-review process and being published.

**Comment**

A doctor recently asked the all important question:  Is Any Vaccine Worth Getting?

The only way a person can truly answer this honestly is if they have the totality of the evidence.  We’ve been told repeatedly that vaccines are “safe and effective” and that we should simply believe despite the following inconvenient facts:

Here is a download of the various vaccines and their toxic ingredients. And here you can read about the nearly 400 adverse reactions listed in the package inserts.

The COVID shots are absent as they are gene therapy products acquired through Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) with package inserts purposely left blank. The government made it illegal to obtain vials; however, some researchers have finally been able to study them and they found major contamination in all of them with toxic substances. Further, researchers have meticulously collected serious adverse events and have called for a global moratorium.

And don’t miss Dr. Trozzi’s1,000 peer-reviewed articleson COVID shot injuries.

For more:

Category:

Activism, Heart Issues, vaccines, Viruses

Study: Non-Live Vaccines Increase Risk of All-Cause Mortality & Autopsy Shows COVID Shot Induced Myocarditis

The following article demonstrates the false premise that is currently pervading our culture.  The premise is that all vaccines are safe and effective.  They often aren’t, and the thousands of vaccine injured can attest to this simple, verifiable fact.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/vaccines-can-impact-long-term-survival-from-other-diseases-study

Vaccines Could Impact Mortality and Risks of Other Diseases: Study

A recent review found non-live vaccines tend to increase a person’s risks of all-cause mortality, as well.
1/8/2024

Apart from potentially preventing a particular disease, vaccines may cause persistent nonspecific effects that can affect a person’s lifetime survival.

In a review published on Dec. 26 in Vaccine, researchers found that non-live vaccines like influenza, COVID-19, hepatitis B, and diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTaP) tend to cause adverse nonspecific effects (NSE), increasing a person’s risks of all-cause mortality and the potential risk of infections from diseases they are meant to protect against.

A live vaccine contains a weakened form of the pathogen, which is less virulent but capable of replicating in the body, thus mimicking the actual disease progression. Non-live vaccines use inactivated viruses, fragments, or genes of the pathogen to trigger an immune response without pathogen replication.

Live vaccines elicit a much stronger immune defense, typically requiring only one shot, while non-live vaccines result in a weaker response, often necessitating multiple shots.

So far, research has identified several non-live vaccines that cause adverse nonspecific effects, namely DTaP and Tdap, influenza H1N1, malaria, hepatitis B, inactivated polio, and COVID mRNA vaccines.

The Vaccine study singled out DTaP, influenza, malaria, hepatitis B, and COVID mRNA vaccines.  (See link for article)

________________

Important points:

  • The innate immune system can be trained as it learns from its previous battles.
  • The article quotes an author of the study (Dr. Christine Stabell Benn) who states that while non-live vaccines cause negative NSEs, administering a live vaccine after a non-live one neutralizes negative NSEs. She uses studies evaluating measles vaccine safety for this rationale and the fact that when the measles vaccine is given after the DTP, there is an overall positive effect, whereas if the order is reversed there is a negative effect.
  • Demonstrating that girls are at a greater risk of adverse nonspecific effects:  Girls who took the DTaP vaccine had a 50 percent higher risk of dying than boys who got it. Compared to girls who were DTaP-unvaccinated, vaccinated girls’ risk of dying was over 2.5 times higher.
  • Benn states substituting live vaccines with non-live vaccines poses a risk to general immunity as it becomes less trained and “lazy.”
  • Benn believes that the “risk of getting the real disease with the live vaccines has been seen as a bigger threat than I think it deserves.”  (I completely disagree with this as well as the continued insistence that everyone should be vaccinated)
  • Benn’s research has been largely unacknowledged by academia.  She feels this is due to the fact that it shows some vaccines may sometimes be harmful.
  • Benn argues further that these live vaccines are no longer patented, making them very cheap to make.
  • Immunologists now largely agree that some vaccines cause nonspecific effects, but how these effects should be quantified remains controversial.  (Tell that to the CDC, FDA, and NIH!)
  • At the end of the article Benn mentions that live vaccines may induce the actual disease they were intended to eradicate.  (Polio and measles come to mind).  Go here to learn important history rarely mentioned today.
  • COVID vaccines are associated with adverse events due to the presence of highly toxic spike proteins, which studies now link to long COVID and vaccine injuries.
In the medical textbook “The Immune Response,” the authors wrote that, in isolated cases, live viral strains administered to individuals can regain virulence, causing disease in recipients. Additionally, there is a risk of contamination with other viral strains during manufacturing.
________________
**Comment**

No matter how you cut it, vaccines can be and are dangerous to many people and there are some people who should NEVER be vaccinated.  For some reason this idea is no longer accepted, when it used to be a simple tenant of medicine that was respected by most doctors and laypeople alike.  The fact it is no longer respected says something about the current state of affairs that once again, ‘the powers that be’ are controlling globally every, single person on planet earth by putting us all in a four-cornered box despite the implications.
The continued denial of vaccine harm is hurting untold numbers of people.  In a perfect example of this, the FDA just violated agency guidelines by promoting the illogic off-label use of COVID shots to treat long COVID when research has shown they can cause it.
_____________
Despite not having randomized trial data, The American College of Cardiology gave an unprecedented position statement on COVID, which is outside their field, published the ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Cardiovascular Sequelae of COVID-19 in Adults that stated
“The ACC has long supported vaccination as a vital protective measure against dangerous illness and for personal and community health. There is no question that the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination generally outweigh the risks.”
They must now eat their own words.

Autopsy findings in cases of fatal COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis

Nicolas Hulscher1*, Roger Hodkinson2, William Makis2,3and Peter A. McCullough2,4,51
ESC Heart Failure (2024)
Published online
Abstract
COVID-19 vaccines have been linked to myocarditis, which, in some circumstances, can be fatal. This systematic review aims to investigate potential causal links between COVID-19 vaccines and death from myocarditis using post-mortem analysis. We per-formed a systematic review of all published autopsy reports involving COVID-19 vaccination-induced myocarditis through 3July 2023. All autopsy studies that include COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis as a possible cause of death were included. Causality in each case was assessed by three independent physicians with cardiac pathology experience and expertise. We initially identified 1691 studies and, after screening for our inclusion criteria, included 14 papers that contained 28 autopsy cases. The cardiovascular system was the only organ system affected in 26 cases. In two cases, myocarditis was characterized as a consequence from multisystem inflammatory syndrome. The mean age of death was 44.4 years old. The mean and median number of days from last COVID-19 vaccination until death were 6.2 and 3 days, respectively. We established that all 28 deaths were most likely causally linked to COVID-19 vaccination by independent review of the clinical information presented in each paper. The temporal relationship, internal and external consistency seen among cases in this review with known COVID-19vaccine-induced myocarditis, its pathobiological mechanisms, and related excess death, complemented with autopsy confirmation, independent adjudication, and application of the Bradford Hill criteria to the overall epidemiology of vaccine myocarditis, suggests that there is a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and death from myocarditis.

**UPDATE**

There is now an obvious concern about receiving a blood transfusion using COVID ‘vaccinated’ blood.  This article based on a Twitter post relays an important patient case of a COVID ‘vaxxed’ blood transfusion causing blood clotting and pericarditis.  Another unfortunate example of this is the death of a baby who died of blood clots after the hospital gave him a blood transfusion using “vaccinated” blood against the parents’ wishes. The hospital somehow managed to “lose” the specially donated unvaccinated blood by a family friend, so have an advocate with you if you are in the hospital.

Similarly to the redacted pages and blind refusal to admit the injections are even causing widespread blood and heart problems, researchers are carefully toeing the narrative by stooping so low as to compare the potential for life-altering health issues to a historical example of denying blood based upon race (the old race card).  There is quite a difference between the two when you consider the potential life-altering damage or even death from COVID ‘vaxxed’ blood. It’s simply easier to call it all ‘misinformation.’

You be the judge.
Go here to learn how to obtain mRNA ‘vaccine’-free blood.
For more:

Category:

Activism, Heart Issues, vaccines, Viruses