Archive for the ‘Activism’ Category

44 Reasons Cell Phones Can Cause Cancer

UPDATE: Oct. 2024

South Korean researchers who analyzed 24 studies and published their report on Oct. 10 in Environmental Health — found significantly higher risks for malignant brain tumors, meningioma and glioma on the side of the head where cellphones were held.

https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/44-reasons-cell-phones-can-cause-cance

44 Reasons Cell Phones Can Cause Cancer

“© Monday, August 26th 2019 
GreenMedInfo LLC. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of GreenMedInfo LLC. Want to learn more from GreenMedInfo? Sign up for the newsletter here //www.greenmedinfo.com/greenmed/newsletter.”

44 Reasons To Believe Cell Phones Can Cause Cancer
Originally Published On ElectricSense.com

Is there a connection between cell phones and cancer? Here are 44 reasons to believe that cell phones can cause cancer

Cell phones emit microwave radio-frequency radiation. Fact.

This radiation has the ability to penetrate our bodies. Fact.

Our governments do virtually nothing to protect us from these dangers. Fact.

And yet there is strong evidence and multiple peer reviewed studies that indicate that cell phones cause cancer and other diseases.

Take a look for yourself at these facts.

But first let’s just consider what cancer is.

Cancer And DNA

The National Cancer Institute says,

Cancer is a term used for diseases in which abnormal cells divide without control and are able to invade other tissues … all cancers begin in cells … cells grow and divide in a controlled way to produce more cells as they are needed to keep the body healthy. When cells become old or damaged, they die and are replaced with new cells. However, sometimes this orderly process goes wrong. The genetic material (DNA) of a cell can become damaged or changed, producing mutations that affect normal cell growth and division. When this happens, cells do not die when they should and new cells form when the body does not need them.”

So cancer typically involves abnormal cell division and DNA damage and in some cases cells may form a mass of tissue called a tumor.

Types Of Brain Tumor

In the studies done to date cell phone radiation exposures are principally linked to two types of brain tumor: gliomas and acoustic neuromas.

Gliomas, a type of tumor that starts in the brain or spine are typically malignant. Gliomas are particularly deadly. Most people survive only 1 to 3 years after diagnosis.

Acoustic neuromas, though non-malignant (low-grade cancer), are in many cases life threatening given that they are an intracranial tumor.

The 44 Reasons

1. Cellular Damage: Telecoms giant T-Mobile in Germany commissioned an independent study to review all relevant research on the health risks from wireless telecommunications. It was concluded that,

On the cellular level, a multitude of studies found the type of damage from high frequency electromagnetic fields which is important for cancer initiation and cancer promotion.”

Brain Tumors And Brain Cancers

2. Significantly Increased Risk of Glioma: Gliomas are becoming increasingly common. The $25 million Interphone Study found that:

… regular use of a cell phone by adults can significantly increase the risk of gliomas by 40% with 1640 hours or more of use (this is about one half hour per day over ten years).”


Source: Table 2 INTERPHONE Study Group. Brain tumour risk in relation to mobile telephone use: results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study. Int J Epidemiol (2010); 39(3):675-694

3. Tumor Risk on Cell Phone Side of Head: Again from the Interphone Study – currently the big daddy of cell phone radiation studies it being the largest and longest study on the link between cell phones and brain tumors – it also found, “tumors were more likely to occur on the side of the head most used for calling.”

4. Harmful Association Between Cell Phone Radiation and Tumors: A review of 23 epidemiological studies by 7 scientists on the link between cell phones and cancer concluded, “harmful association.” One of the reports authors commenting the study results said, “although as a whole the data varied, among the 10 higher quality studies, we found a harmful association between phone use and tumor risk. The lower quality studies, which failed to meet scientific best practices, were primarily industry funded.”

5. Increased Risk For Glioma and Acoustic Neuroma: the studies performed by the Hardell Research Group are widely regarded as being amongst the best. This recent study finds, “A consistent pattern of increased risk for glioma and acoustic neuroma associated with use of wireless phones.” These findings are consistent with their earlier studies.

6. Temporal Lobe & Glioma Risk: A recent French study found evidence of an increased risk of glioma and temporal lobe tumors. The study found that, “risks were higher for gliomas, temporal tumours, occupational and urban mobile phone use.” According to EMF watchdog Powerwatch this is an important paper, “that confirms existing studies and which should help move the IARC RF evaluation strongly towards a Group 2A – ‘probable human carcinogen’.”

7. Increased Risk of Acoustic Neuroma in Long-Term Users of Cell Phones: A recent study on 790,000 middle aged women in the UK found that, “women who used cell phones for ten or more years were two-and- a-half times more likely to develop an acoustic neuroma. Their risk of acoustic neuroma increased with the number of years they used cell phones.”

8. Increased Risk of Acoustic Neuroma: Research conducted by Lonn suggests, “an increased risk of acoustic neuroma associated with mobile phone use of at least 10 years’ duration.”

9. Brain Tumor Risk is Higher on ‘Cell Phone’ Side of Head: A research paper that reviewed 11 studies found, “a link between prolonged cell phone usage and the development of an ipsilateral [same side of head as cell phone] brain tumor.”

10. Meningioma: This Swedish study looked at adult brain tumor cases diagnosed over a two year period. Although the study concluded that, “no conclusive evidence of an association between use of mobile and cordless phones and meningioma was found.” The studies authors did say, “an indication of increased risk was seen in the group with highest cumulative use.”

11. Malignant Brain Tumors: Recent work by Hardell looked at long-term use of mobile and cordless phones. In conclusion it was found that, “this study confirmed previous results of an association between mobile and cordless phone use and malignant brain tumors. These findings provide support for the hypothesis that RF-EMFs play a role both in the initiation and promotion stages of carcinogenesis.”


Image: Hardell Research Group

Other Cancers And Tumors

12. Cancer of the Pituitary Gland: The pituitary gland, considered by many to be the “master gland” of the body, is a pea sized organ located in the middle of the base of the brain that produces hormones that play a major role in regulating vital body functions and general well-being. This study (already referenced above) also found that,

the risk of cancer of the pituitary gland more was more than twice as high among women who used a cell phone for less than five years as compared to never users.”

13. Thyroid Cancer: The thyroid gland is situated in the neck. Using a cell phone against your ear exposes your thyroid to cell phone radiation. A recent Israeli study observing that, “the incidence of thyroid cancer has been on the rise in Israel for more than a decade which matches the rise in the use of cellphones” collected human thyroid cells from healthy patients and subjected them to radiation. The study found, “evidence of changes in thyroid cells in response to electromagnetic radiation.”

14. Melanoma Risk: Melanoma is a cancer that starts in a certain type of skin cell. A Swedish study found “a very clear association between increasing use of mobile phones and increasing rates of head melanoma in Nordic countries.”


Image: Örjan Hallberg

15. Stem Cell Cancer: In a controversial US study on 29 cases of neuroepithelial tumors, cell phone users accounted for 11 of them. These initial results indicated a near tripling in the risk of neuroepithelial tumors through cell phone use. The published results were revised to reflect a doubling of risk and then reported as not “statistically significant.”

16. Oral Cancer: An Israeli study on 460 cases of parotid gland tumors found, “based on the largest number of benign PGT patients reported to date, our results suggest an association between cellular phone use and PGTs [parotid gland tumors].” The parotid is the salivary gland near the cheek where many users hold their cell phone.

17. Parotid Malignant Tumors: Another Israeli study analyzed deaths as recorded on the National Cancer Registry over a 36 year period found, “the total number of parotid gland cancers in Israel increased 4-fold from 1970 to 2006 , whereas other major salivary gland cancers remained stable.”


Image: Environmental Health Trust

18. Leukemia: A comprehensive review of over a dozen studies including studies on exposures from cell tower radiation, TV and Radio broadcast towers concluded, “cancer, especially brain tumor and leukemia, but all other cancers also.”

19. Lymph Node Cancer: In an Australian study one hundred mice were exposed to RF radiation for two 30-minute periods per day for up to 18 months. The authors called the increased incidence of lymphoma “highly significant.” They added that “it is very unlikely that the faster onset of cancer was due to chance.”

20. Multifocal Breast Cancer: American researchers studied four young women with breast cancer. They found that, “all patients regularly carried their smartphones directly against their breasts in their brassieres for up to 10 hours a day, for several years, and developed tumors in areas of their breasts immediately underlying the phones.”

21. Eye Cancer: A German Study has established a link between uveal melanoma and cell phone radiation and similar exposures. The study “found an elevated risk for exposure to radiofrequency-transmitting devices.” Another study found ocular symptoms and sensations in long term users of mobile phones.

22. Diverse Cancerous Tumors: A Brazilian Study established a direct link between various cancer deaths such as tumors in the prostate, breast, lung, kidneys and liver in Brazil’s third largest city, and cell phone tower radiation exposures. The study found that, “more than 81 percent of people who die in Belo Horizonte by specific types of cancer live less than 500 meters away from the 300 identified cell phone antennas in the city”.


Source. This same study also lists more than a dozen other research papers that have found a link between different cancers and cell phone/cell tower radiation exposures.

Cell Phone Subscriptions And Brain Tumors

23. Cell Phone Subscription Link to Brain Tumors: A U.S. study analyzed the number of cell phone subscriptions and brain tumors in nineteen US states, they concluded,

the very linear relationship between cell phone usage and brain tumor incidence is disturbing and certainly needs further epidemiological evaluation.”

24. Brain Cancer Incidence Increases Over Time (U.S): Another U.S. study of brain cancer incidence trends in relation to cell phone use in the United States found, “there was a statistically significant increasing trend between 1992 and 2006 among females but not among males. The recent trend in 20-29-year-old women was driven by a rising incidence of frontal lobe cancers.”

25. Brain Cancer Incidence Increases Over Time (Europe): Studies carried out in Norway, Finland and the U.K. have identified a similar trend of an increase in the incidence of brain cancer over time. In the UK study the incidence of malignant brain tumors close to where you hold your phone was highlighted.


Source: Mobile Phone Use and Cancer Risk – Research on a Group 2B Carcinogen. Joel M. Moskowitz Ph.D.

Other Effects On the Brain

26. Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB) Permeability: The BBB is a membrane which prevents toxic materials from the blood from entering the brain. It was first discovered in 1975 that RF radiation causes the BBB to leak, since then at least a dozen laboratories around the world have corroborated this effect. There’s no consensus on the link between BBB damage and cancer but some studies elude to this.

27. Brain Cell Loss: A Turkish study on adult female rats that were exposed to a 900 MHz electromagnetic field found that, “EMF exposure caused a significant decrease of the … cell number … additionally, cell loss can be seen.” In their conclusions the researchers drew parallels between these exposures and teenagers’ brains that are exposed to cell phone radiation.

28. Brain Activity: Researchers in China exposed 18 participants to RF radiation (LTE) for 30 minutes which was well within international (ICNIRP) cell phone legal limits. They concluded that, “30min LTE RF-EMF exposure modulated the spontaneous low frequency fluctuations in some brain regions.”

29. Brain Blood Flow Affected: This Finnish brain imaging study found that “that the EMF emitted by a commercial mobile phone affects rCBF [regional cerebral blood flow] in humans.” This suggests that cell phone radiation affects neuronal activity.

30. Texting Affects Memory: An Australian study on young adolescents found “students who reported making or receiving more voice or SMS calls per week, and in particular more of both, demonstrated shorter response times on learning tasks, but less accurate working memory.”

DNA Damage

One way cancer and other diseases are believed to develop is when the DNA (genetic information) in a cell becomes damaged. This damage mutates the DNA. There are many studies linking cell phone radiation exposures to different types of DNA damage.

31. Single and Double-Strand DNA Breaks: In pioneering work a University of Washington team found DNA single strand breaks from RF radiation exposures on rats in an initial study. A subsequent study found single and double-strand DNA breaks.

32. Various Genetic Effects: An Austrian study analyzed the results of 101 different published articles on the effects of radio frequency EMFs on DNA. The study concluded that, “there is ample evidence that RF-EMF can alter the genetic material of exposed cells.”

33. Increased Rates of Micronuclei: Micronuclei proliferation indicates a type of DNA damage strongly associated with cancer. A Brazilian study found that, “electromagnetic field irradiation [low level cell phone type exposures] during pregnancy leads to an increase in erythrocytes micronuclei incidence in rat offspring.” Several studies have found increased rates of micronuclei in the body following exposures to RF radiation.

34. Heat Shock Proteins (HSPs) Production Decreased: A U.S. study exposed chick embryo’s to RF radiation. They concluded that, “this EMF-induced decrease in HSP70 levels and resulting decline in cytoprotection suggests a mechanism by which daily exposure (such as might be experienced by mobile phone users) could enhance the probability of cancer and other diseases.”

35. Oxidative DNA Damage: The Guler study in Turkey exposed female and male infant rabbits to 1800 MHz radio frequency radiation and found, “GSM-like RF radiation may induce biochemical changes by increasing free radical attacks to structural biomolecules.” Free radical damage is associated with the development of cancer.

36. DNA Strand Breaks: This Austrian study exposed human and rat cells to mobile phone radiation and found, “DNA single- and double-strand breaks.”

37. Changes in Gene Expression: The Belyaev study found that, exposing the “rat brain to 915 MHz GSM microwaves induces changes in gene expression.” Other studies suggest that, “subtle changes of gene expression associated with [disease].”

38. Genotoxic Effects: The Schwarz study exposed human cells to 1,950 MHz UMTS. It concluded that “UMTS exposure may cause genetic alterations in some but not in all human cells in vitro.”

39. Neurotransmitters Impacted: This Bavarian study followed 60 people over one and a half years following the installation of a new cell phone base station in their village. The study concluded that, “the effects showed a dose-response relationship,” that it had “occurred well below current limits for technical RF radiation exposures” and that these effects have “great relevance for health and [are] well known to damage human health in the long run.” In other words the more people were exposed to cell phone type radiation the bigger the impact on their health.

40. Chromosome Damage: A Belgian study reviewed 16 expert gene monitoring studies from around the world. In 13 of the 16 independent studies performed worldwide it was found that, “RF-exposed individuals have increased frequencies of genetic damage (e.g., chromosomal aberrations).”

41. Central Nervous System: US based researcher Dr. Henry Lai comments that there are several studies which show that repeated RF exposure at relatively low power caused morphological changes in the central nervous system, “changes in morphology, especially cell death, could have an important implication on health. Injury-induced cell proliferation has been hypothesized as a cause of cancer.”

Reading Between The Lines

The studies don’t tell all of the story. Here are some other things you need to know.

42. Latency Period Before Diagnosis: To put this in the words of researcher Dr. Martin Blank “cancers do not form overnight.” In almost all cases, cancerous tumors take many years to form and metastasize.” According to Dr. Blank’s statements, then cancers are overpowered. This would suggest that we might be sitting on a cell phone radiation cancer time bomb.

43. Cell Phone Radiation Cancer Time Bomb: To give a sense to what this latency period could mean in terms of the incidence of brain tumors in the years to come, researcher Lloyd Morgan produced this alarming graphic showing that brain tumor cases could reach epidemic proportions within the next decade:

44. Flawed Research: Not all of the research points to a link between cell phone radiation and cancer. But then that’s hardly surprising given the lengths some researchers go to, to skew the results. This research paper also lays bare the phenomenon of study bias. This can take many different shapes and forms; insufficient latency time, incorrect definition of “regular” cell phone user, cell phones radiating higher power levels in rural areas not investigated, exposure to other transmitting sources not considered, exclusion of brain tumor cases due to death or illness, etc.

The Tip Of The Iceberg

There is lot of interest surrounding the link between cell phone radiation and cancer. But cancer is only the tip of the iceberg.

Microwave radio-frequency radiation exposures of the type emitted by cell phones are also linked to many other diseases and potentially life threatening illnesses, including:

  • sperm damage & male infertility
  • miscarriages
  • vaginal discharge
  • vascular system disease
  • tinnitus
  • childhood cancer
  • sleep problems
  • depression
  • irritability
  • memory loss
  • concentration difficulties
  • headaches
  • dizziness and fatigue
  • suicidal tendencies
  • arrhythmia
  • heart attacks
  • bone marrow interference
  • altered calcium level in cells
  • ADHD
  • reduction in night-time melatonin
  • suppression of the immune system
  • arthritis
  • rheumatism
  • skin symptoms
  • lymphatic diseases
  • autism
  • hearing problems

See more at here. 

Learn the truth about wireless radiation and the global 5G rollout at the 5G Crisis Summit happening now! Get access here! 

Article originally published: 2014-12-13  Article updated: 2019-08-26

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.

School Nurse Documents Nineteen Lyme Disease Case Studies: Misdiagnosis is Rampant!

https://www.change.org/p/the-us-senate-calling-for-a-congressional-investigation-of-the-cdc-idsa-and-aldf/u/25034986?

School nurse documents nineteen case studies; misdiagnosis is rampant!

SEP 5, 2019 — 

My Son Got Lyme Disease. He’s Totally Fine.
Horror stories about lingering Lyme disease proliferate, but the illness is easily treated.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/27/well/live/lyme-disease-children-treatment-diagnosis.html

 

Sept 5, 2019

Yale School of Public Health
60 College St.  Suite 212
New Haven, CT 06510-3201
Attn: Sten H. Vermund, MD, PhD, Dean and Anna M.R. Lauder Professor of Public Health; Professor of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine

Dear Dr. Vermund,

I would like to call attention to the above listed New York Times article where Dr. Eugene Shapiro exploits a case of early Lyme disease that responded to antibiotic treatment giving the reader the impression that Lyme is a simple nuisance disease and patients who are severely disabled are somehow delusional.

Focusing on the acute stage of disease after early treatment has misguided an entire medical community as these results are then assumed to apply to the entire patient population (as depicted in the attached caricature).  https://www.dropbox.com/s/dljlsmjbvk2trur/lyme%20toon.JPG?dl=0

The fact of the matter is Lyme disease can become a life altering infection if not treated immediately.

I am including below nineteen case studies forwarded to me by a school nurse from a Lyme endemic region here in the United States. As you read these accounts it becomes crystal clear that patient experience is nothing like the case Dr. Shapiro presents and it is far more common to be misdiagnosed by a medical community misguided by Dr. Shapiro and his co-defendants named in the Texas lawsuit; Lisa Torrey vs IDSA.

Might I remind you Dr. Vermund that Shapiro represents your institution so how he presents his viewpoint/bias is under your watch. Will you continue to turn a blind eye to this behavior?

Case studies forwarded to me by a school nurse who took the time to document this travesty:

Case #1 Male age 7

Second grader develops a sudden onset of severe ear pain with an audible clicking sound which can be heard by placing your ear up to the child’s ear. Child went on to develop a chronic cough, anxiety and weakness in his legs. After multiple doctor visits, the child was eventually diagnosed with Palatal Myoclonus, Asthma and Anxiety.  His pain in his ears and the clicking in his ears became unbearable, by the time he reached 5th grade he was place on homebound instruction for several years. He went through multiple ear surgeries with no relief.

Supporting evidence

This child tested Positive for Lyme and Babesia  through Igenix.  Looking back in his medical records, child had a tick embedded in his head for approximately two days at the age of five.  He was seen by the pediatrician with no further treatment deemed necessary. He was seen a few weeks later by the same pediatrician for a rash but it was dismissed. He then developed a chronic cough; (Babesia) Mom even suspected Lyme and requested a Lyme test. Mom thought it was ruled out, looking back at his medical records, the physician ordered the Elisa which was negative. This child was robbed of his childhood.

Follow-up

Child is now 14 and pain free after successful treatment for Lyme and Babesia by a LLMD. Mother has since written three books about her son’s journey and how she discovered her entire family is also infected with tick borne infections.  Sadly, this child suffered horribly for most of his childhood before being properly diagnosed and treated. No child should have endured this unnecessary suffering. Book title “Connecting the Dots” by Sherri Jonas shares this child’s tragic journey.

Case #2 Male age 6

First grader, four days after a tick bite in the month of May, complained of leg pain and fatigue. He became emotional and lost interest in playing with his friends. Chose to pass on hockey or soccer which was unlike him. He cried a lot and was clingy. The complaints of muscle pain continued. Then he fell asleep on the bus twice coming home from school. The school nurse called to say he was suddenly distant and withdrawn with low energy and even fell asleep in class.  His spring sports had ended so there was no reason for his sudden onset of fatigue. School nurse called again due to his inability to engage in class and his sudden sullen mood. He began failing unexplainably and had unexplained falls.

Supporting evidence

Tick Bite with symptoms: Clinically symptomatic for Lyme. Mother who is a teacher had recently attended Pat Smith’s Lyme presentation.  She immediately recognized what was happening and made an appt with her pediatrician. Mom provided a list of symptoms since the tick bite and a letter from the school. The pediatrician checked him thoroughly. Parent requested antibiotics based on clinical symptoms. Pediatrician refused and proceeded to order the basic Elisa and other blood work for mono etc. The mother tried to educate the pediatrician on the inaccuracies of testing as well as testing too soon (It had only been a week since the bite). She was ignored. Two days later, the office called to say all tests were negative and offered no follow-up.  Parent contacted a LLMD and was seen the next day. Child was immediately started on a course of antibiotics due to clinical symptoms occurring within days of removing an engorged tick.

Follow-up

Child was successfully treated by a Lyme Literate physician. After 8 weeks of antibiotics, the child’s health returned to baseline.

Case #3 Female age 8

Third grader develops sudden onset of migrating joint pain and bluish discoloration of her hands. School nurse contacts the family and educates on the possibility of Lyme disease. Child was seen by their pediatrician. A note came to school the next day stating the child is not contagious and should not be sent home with her cold, swollen blue hands, only needed to have hands warmed. No blood work was ordered. The school nurse calls the pediatrician expressing concern; pediatrician contacts the family and refers the child to a rheumatologist.  Weeks later, the child sees the Rheumatologist who ordered the Elisa which of course was negative.

Supporting evidence

Clinically symptomatic for Lyme disease/Poor clinical evaluation. Lives in a Lyme endemic area, was seen several times at urgent care and at the pediatricians for ankle pain, leg pain, wrist pain, back pain and headaches over the past year. Palliative care was offered each time.  Low vitamin d levels, past hx of epstein barr. Rheumatologist actually wrote a note for school stating that this child did not have Lyme (based on an Elisa) but has “Raynaud-like  phenomena”. Rheumatologist continued to say, the migrating joint pain was related to the child’s flat feet and ordered Physical Therapy.

Follow-up

This young girl has been set up for possible chronic Lyme disease. Referred for physical therapy for flat feet causing her joint pains.  And the family was told to follow-up in the winter or if develops ulcers on the fingers.

Case #4 Male age 5

Colleague’s five year old son was suffering with chronic knee pain and developed a limp for over a year. He was seen by several physicians and was diagnosed with “growing pains”

Supporting evidence

Seen by a LLMD, tested positive for Lyme and Bartonella                          Lives in a Lyme endemic area, plays soccer, developed chronic knee joint pain with swelling and fatigue.  Walked with a limp at times.

Follow-up

Child was seen and treated successfully by a LLMD and his health returned to baseline.

Case #5 Male age 5

In obtaining a medical history from his mom, I nearly cried as I knew immediately this little guy was a victim. At the age of 2, child developed: a sudden onset of high intermittent fevers, (parents told they were benign fevers) ; racing heart;  severe night sweats; severe cyclic headaches; sensitivity to lights; recurrent vomiting, constipation, feet pain, muscle weakness, sudden loss of speech at age 2,  difficulty concentrating, irritability, aggression, insomnia, allergies, swollen lymph nodes, cries easily.  He had two abnormal Mri of his brain and spine (both showed t2 flairs in the white matter) yet this poor child was diagnosed  with bipolar, OCD and AUTISM!. Tick-borne infections were never even suspected even with given the above symptoms that do not correlate with typical autism.  His treatment consisted of monitoring abnormal lab values and supportive care for autism.

Supporting evidence

Lives in a endemic area, history of spider and tick bites. Seen by a LLMD. Tested positive for Lyme disease, Bartonella Henselae, Bartonella Quintana and Babesia and AUTOIMMUNE ENCEPHALITIS. Mother was clinically symptomatic for Lyme and bartonella throughout pregnancy, recently tested positive for Lyme and bartonella. He has had several abnormal MRI of the brain/spine with evidence of t2 flair in the white matter which can be caused by infection yet it was never considered. His MRI’s are now normal post antibiotic therapy. He had several abnormal blood values including low vitamin d, low thyroid, low iron.

Follow-up

Child was seen by a llmd and began treatment. It was very hard to watch this little guy respond to the antibiotics, immediately herxed, severe fatigue, vomited, multiple bartonella rashes, child was crawling out of his skin. Medications had to be titrated very slowly. Within a month, this nonverbal child said the word “mama”. It’s on video.  After 6 months, the child began communicating using a computerized talker, he told us when he had headaches.  He became potty trained. His fatigue and vomiting resolved. His fevers resolved. His night sweats disappeared. His MRI’s were now normal after antibiotics.  (This is no coincidence). A mainstream Neurologist recognized that this child most likely had post infectious autoimmune encephalitis and she was able to get IVIG covered by Insurance.  At this point the child was making amazing gains, the IVIG literally turned this family’s life around only for Insurance to deny further infusions and cause a setback in his progression.  Was this child ever Autistic or was this medically induced Autism?

Case #6 Female age 6

Child was in first grade, I was the school nurse. She developed sudden severe foot pain, severe stomach aches, severe headaches, eye sensitivity. Sinus congestion, frequent sore throats. Suffered for years. Parents were told, it had to be stress related and questioned the family for possible contributing factors. This was one of the most loving, supportive families I knew. Met with mom 10 years later to find out her baby girl now had insulin dependent diabetes and debilitating headaches.

Supporting evidence

Seen by LLMD. Tested positive for Lyme disease. Lives in a lyme endemic area. Sudden onset of symptoms with no underlying cause. Seen by multiple doctors throughout her childhood and Lyme disease was never suspected.

Follow-up

Successfully treated by a LLMD and is pain-free.  What’s sad is if her infection had been recognized and treated early, she may not have developed Autoimmune Juvenile Diabetes.  Today she is attending college and is on the Cheerleading team.  Remains symptom free.

Case #7 Female age 20

College student with a 4.0 has was taken by ambulance to the ER for sudden onset of panic and cutting in the month of May.  Diagnosed with sudden onset of bipolar disorder!  Later develops racing heart, balance issues, migrating joint pain and incontinence.  She tells doctors “the woods are my beach” yet was never tested for tick borne infections.

Supporting evidence

Multiple Tick bites, lives in an endemic area. Tested positive for Lyme and Bartonella. Past history of asthma like symptoms and migrating joint pain.

Follow-up

Failed by medicine, parents took her to an INFECTIOUS Disease physician who told them “Lyme can not cause her symptoms”. All antibiotics were stopped. She has since been admitted in and out of at least 10 psychiatric hospitals over the last two years loaded up on psychiatric drugs and discharged. Today, she now suffers from seizures!

Case #8 Female age 9

Third grader develops asthma-like symptoms. Later develops a racing heart with heart beats as high as 230 beats per minute. Parent educated on Lyme disease and possible effects on the heart.

Supporting evidence

Lives in a Lyme endemic area, sudden onset.  Pediatrician ignores Lyme testing, removes the child from recess and gym until seen by cardiology. Child was cleared to resume full activity with no cause to her sudden episodes of tachycardia and air hunger.

Follow-up

Another child possibly set up for chronic Lyme. She continues to have episodes of racing heart rate and shortness of breath.

Case #9 Male age 15

Parent reports a tick bite and developed a sandpapery rash a few days later.  Seen by pediatrician and requested a clinical diagnosis of Lyme disease. Pediatrician ignored the history of the reported tick bite and instead stated the rash resemble strep. Parent expressed concern that he never  had strep nor does his throat hurt.  The pediatrician continued to culture for strep and gave prescribed ten days of amoxicillin and advised stopping the antibiotic if the culture is negative.   Child was seen the next day by a llmd and suddenly realized his years of intermittent ankle and knee pain were not growing pains. His years of feeling dizziness upon rising was not benign cardiogenic syncope. His diagnosis of Asthma was air hunger.  Parent listened as her son told the LLMD he suffered from drenching night sweats and so much more. Things teenagers think are normal.

Supporting evidence

Symptoms began after moving to a lyme endemic area on 5.5 acres. History of tick bites. Tested positive for lyme, bartonella and babesia.

Follow-up

Successfully treated with multiple antibiotics and currently in remission and attending Virginia Tech.

Case #10 Female age 20

Several years of chronic pain, insomnia, asthma like symptoms, shooting pains up her arms and chest heaviness. Night sweats, stomach issues and Severe sudden nosebleeds, racing heart rate and difficulty focusing.

Supporting evidence

Lyme endemic area. Tested positive for Lyme and Babesia.

Follow-up

Treated successfully by a LLMD

Case #11 Male age 14

Colleague’s nephew developed a sudden onset of cutting, mood swings, outbursts was diagnosed with Bipolar disorder and admitted to a psych ward for 30 days and place on multiple antipsychotics.

Supporting evidence

Sudden onset, soccer player, lives in an endemic area.  History of tick bites. Tested positive for Lyme and Bartonella.

Follow-up

Treated by LLMD Psychiatrist and LLMD. Patient is back to baseline and off antipsychotics.

Case #12 Male age 8

Third grader diagnosed with Autism has a long history of migrating joint pain, hears voices, night terrors, severe headaches, ringing in the ears and night sweats.

Supporting evidence

Lyme endemic area. Autism is a clinical diagnosis, he was never tested for tick borne infections until recently. He was positive for band 23 IGM.

Follow-up

Seen by a Neurologist who advised the family he was negative for Lyme disease. Again, was this child ever Autistic or is this medically induced Autism?

Case #13 Male age 8

Second grader diagnosed with Autism. Unable to communicate. Suffers from severe stomach pains, constipation. Hx of low vitamin d, inflamed lymph nodes, crying spells.

Supporting evidence

Parent educated on Lyme symptoms, he was positive for IGG band 31, 41 58, and IGM 31 on Igenix.

Follow-up

Seen by Infectious disease and told he did not have Lyme and that Igenix is not a reliable lab. Case closed.  Again, was this child Autistic or was this medically induced Autism?

Case #14 Male age 24

Seen by several physicians for brain fog, severe fatigue, night sweats and severe headaches.

Supporting evidence

Tested Positive for Lyme and Bartonella. Lives in a highly Lyme endemic area. Constantly in the woods, multiple exposure to tick bites.

Follow-up

Began treatment with a LLMD but cannot financially afford. Has since tried an INFECTIOUS disease doctor and was told he was a very difficult case but he guaranteed him he did not have Lyme disease. He was referred to neurology and his health continues to spiral out of control.  Today, he is unable to work and suffers daily.

Case #15 Male age 6

Sudden onset of Grand Mal Seizures. Sixteen within 2 weeks. Seen by a top children’s hospital. Parent inquired about Lyme testing and neurologist told them Lyme does not cause seizures.

Supporting evidence

Lives in a endemic area. PMH of nocturnal seizures at age 3, speech delays, developmental delays. Age 6, c/o painful legs sensations

Follow-up

Child was never tested for Tick Borne infections. On three seizure meds and still having seizures.

Case #16 Male age 5

Sudden onset of migrating joint pain, ankles, hips, knees and fingers. Sudden onset of anxiety, began to pull his hair out. Developed hives and wheezing episodes. Mom reports he had a bite and rash several weeks prior but thought nothing of it. Seen in the ER. Diagnosed with Asthma and virus. Started on steroids :(. Followed up with Pediatrician, parent requested a western blot, the Elisa was ordered and was negative. Child’s symptoms increased, developed knee swelling.

Supporting evidence

Lives in an endemic area. History of a bite. Sudden onset of s/s. Positive Igenex IGM Lyme specific Bands

Follow-up

Child was treated with 21 days of antibiotics. He no longer has wheezing episodes, joint pain has resolved. Hives and anxiety resolved. Hoping this child remains asymptomatic as he had symptoms for over a month and was initially placed on immunosuppressants.

Case #17 Female age 6

Child was Diagnosed as Autistic at age 2. After obtaining her PMH which includes a sudden neurological decline around the age of two.  Child pulls out her hair, has episodes of reflux, she is nonverbal. Can be a danger to herself, very impulsive. Teachers agree, child does not present as typical autism.  Parents educated on Lyme disease.

Supporting evidence

Lives in an endemic area. Was meeting developmental milestones up to age 2 with a sudden decline noted. Child tested CDC positive IGM AND IGG through CDC approved labs. Is this child really Autistic? Should the diagnosis be Infectious Encephalopathy?

Follow-up

Child saw a LLMD and was started on antibiotics. Child became very ill with antibiotic treatment. She became aggressive, ate her own feces, was eating bugs, very irritable. After one month, parents could not handle the neuropsychiatric symptoms, they went for a second opinion to a pediatric INFECTIOUS disease doctor who advised parents to stop the antibiotics and stated 3 weeks of antibiotics was enough to cure Lyme. Child is now left to basically be tortured by her own infectious brain.

Case #18 Male age 20

UPENN student with sudden onset of severe anxiety. Seen by Primary who ordered Zoloft and blamed on college stress. Parent is a nurse, requested a western blot. Physician stated ” I will order the test but highly doubt he has Lyme”.

Supporting evidence

Lives in an endemic area. CDC Positive for Lyme through approved CDC lab and positive for  Bartonella through Galaxy Diagnostics. .  PMH of fatigue, air hunger, mild anxiety, chest pains. Symptoms began in HS, he stated he just thought he was overthinking things.

Follow-up

Improving under treatment with a LLMD

Case #19 Female age 14

Ninth grader with onset of mood swings, Diagnosed bipolar

Supporting evidence

Endemic area with sudden onset. Positive for Lyme and Bartonella

Follow-up

Improving under treatment with a LLMD

__________________________

Respectfully submitted,

Carl Tuttle

Lyme Endemic Hudson, NH

“When “evidence based medicine” has been spun to fit bias agendas and the patient voice has been intentionally ignored who investigates the dishonest science?”

Cc: New York Times Editorial Office

Cynthia L. Sears, MD, FIDSA, President, IDSA

Tick-Borne Disease Working Group

Daniel Dutko, lead attorney Lisa Torrey vs IDSA lawsuit

Court document: 
https://www.dropbox.com/s/18uyrli878ug51m/LymeDisease%20RICO%20Lawsuit.pdf?dl=0

________________

For more on Dr. Shapiro:   https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/06/11/dr-eugene-shapiro-medically-unexplained-symptoms/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/05/20/petition-remove-eugene-shapiro-from-federal-tbd-working-group/Here are a few statements the Shapiro has made on the record:

·       “There is no such thing as chronic Lyme disease.”

·       “90% of Lyme cases are cured with doxycycline for a few weeks.”

·       “Neurologic Lyme in children doesn’t exist.”

·       “This isn’t AIDS that we’re talking about or preventing, folks. It’s not a big deal if you get Lyme disease. It’s easy to treat and cure.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Self-Created Hollow, Straw-men

iu-25

In thinking about many issues, including health in general and Lyme/MSIDS in particular, the following quote by Milton Friedman found in an essay titled “Schools at Chicago,” is timelessly appropriate to our current predicament:

In 1964–to the disgust and dismay of most of my academic friends–I served as an economic adviser to Barry Goldwater during his quest for the Presidency. That year also, I was a Visiting Professor at Columbia University. The two together gave me a rare entree into the New York intellectual community. I talked to and argued with groups from academia, from the media, from the financial community, from the foundation world, from you name it. I was appalled at what I found. There was an unbelievable degree of intellectual homogeneity, of acceptance of a standard set of views complete with cliche answers to every objection, of smug self-satisfaction at belonging to an in-group. The closest similar experience I have ever had was at Cambridge, England, and even that was a distant second.
The homogeneity and provincialism of the New York intellectual community made them pushovers in discussions about Goldwater’s views.They had cliche answers but only to their self-created straw-men. To exaggerate only slightly, they had never talked to anyone who really believed, and had thought deeply about, views drastically different from their own. As a result, when they heard real arguments instead of caricatures, they had no answers, only amazement that such views could be expressed by someone who had the external characteristics of being a member of the intellectual community, and that such views could be defended with apparent cogency. Never have I been more impressed with the advice I once received: “You cannot be sure that you are right unless you understand the arguments against your views better than your opponents do.” – Milton Friedman

Source: https://www.manhattancontrarian.com/about

Thankfully, T.S. Elliot gives us a stern warning about hollow men: https://allpoetry.com/The-Hollow-Men

“This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
Not with a bang but a whimper.”

 

 

Got Ticks? Send & Help IPM

The IPM Institute (Integrated Pest Management) is seeking donations of tick specimens from different regions to examine during the Tick IPM Academy on Nov. 6 & 7, 2019. Please mail in ticks at least a week before. Below is the IPM Institute’s address where specimens you wish to donate may be sent.

This is for examination only – no pathogen reporting will occur.

The IPM Institute of North America, Inc.
ATTN: Maria Weber
211 S. Paterson Street, Suite 380
Madison, Wisconsin 53703

Thank you,

Maria Weber
Team Member, Sustainable Food Group
Office: (608) 232-1410 x 1009

IPM Institute of North America, Inc.<http://ipminstitute.org/>

Details about annual Tick IPM Academy: FINAL Tick IPM Academy Announcement 082719

 

 

Breaking News: Dr. Tim Ball Defeats Michael Mann’s Climate Lawsuit

https://principia-scientific.org/breaking-news-dr-tim-ball-defeats-michael-manns-climate-lawsuit/

Breaking News: Dr Tim Ball Defeats Michael Mann’s Climate Lawsuit!

Written by John O’Sullivan

Supreme Court of British Columbia dismisses Dr Michael Mann’s defamation lawsuit versus Canadian skeptic climatologist, Dr Tim Ball. Full legal costs are awarded to Dr Ball, the defendant in the case.

The Canadian court issued it’s final ruling in favor of the Dismissal motion that was filed in May 2019 by Dr Tim Ball’s libel lawyers.

The plaintiff Mann’s “hockey stick” graph, first published in 1998, was featured prominently in the U.N. 2001 climate report. The graph showed an “unprecedented” spike in global average temperature in the 20th Century after about 500 years of stability.

Skeptics have long claimed Mann’s graph was fraudulent.

On Friday morning (August 23, 2019) Dr Ball sent an email to WUWT revealing:

“Michael Mann’s Case Against Me Was Dismissed This Morning By The BC Supreme Court And They Awarded Me [Court] Costs.”

A more detailed public statement from the world-renowned skeptical climatologist is expected in due course.

Professor Mann is a climate professor at Penn State University. Mann filed his action on March 25, 2011 for Ball’s allegedly libelous statement that Mann “belongs in the state pen, not Penn State.”  The final court ruling, in effect, vindicates Ball’s criticisms.

Previously, on Feb, 03, 2010, a self-serving and superficial academic ‘investigation‘  by Pennsylvania State University had cleared Mann of misconduct. Mann also falsely claimed the NAS found nothing untoward with his work.

But the burden of proof in a court of law is objectively higher.

Not only did the B.C. Supreme Court grant Ball’s application for dismissal of the 8-year, multi-million dollar lawsuit, it also took the additional step of awarding full legal costs to Ball.

This extraordinary outcome will likely trigger severe legal repercussions for Dr Mann in the U.S. and may prove fatal to alarmist climate science claims that modern temperatures are “unprecedented.”

According to the leftist The Guardian newspaper (Feb, 09, 2010), the wider importance of Mann’s graph over the last 20 years is massive:

“Although it was intended as an icon of global warming, the hockey stick has become something else – a symbol of the conflict between mainstream climate scientists and their critics.”

Under court rules, Mann’s legal team have up to 30 days to file an appeal. For readers interested in accessing the court website directly, use this link.

‘Hockey Stick’ Discredited by Statisticians in 2003

In 2003 a Canadian study showed the “hockey stick” curve “is primarily an artefact of poor data handling, obsolete data and incorrect calculation of principal components.” When the data was corrected it showed a warm period in the 15th Century that exceeded the warmth of the 20th Century.

So, the graph was junk science. You could put baseball scores into Mann’s Climate Model and it would create the Hockey Stick.

But the big question then became: did Mann intentionally falsify his graph from motivation to make profit and/or cause harm (i.e. commit the five elements of criminal fraud)?

No one could answer that question unless Mann surrendered his numbers. He was never going to do that voluntarily – or face severe consequences for not doing so – that is, until Dr Ball came into the picture!

Evidence in Legal Discovery and the Truth Defense

Dr Ball’s legal team adroitly pursued the ‘truth defense’ such that the case boiled down to whether Ball’s words (“belongs in the state pen, not Penn State”) after examining the key evidence (Mann’s R2 regression numbers) fairly and accurately portrayed Mann.

The aim was to compel the plaintiff (Dr. Mann) to show his math ‘working out’ to check if he knowingly and criminally misrepresented his claims by resorting to statistical fakery (see: ‘Mike’s trick‘ below).

In the pre-trial Discovery Process the parties are required to surrender the cited key evidence in reasonable fashion, that they believe proves or disproves the Claim.

Despite Ball’s best efforts over 8 years, Mann would not agree to surrender to an open court his math ‘working out’ –  those arcane R2 regression numbers for his graph (see Mann’s latest obfuscating Tweet in the ‘update’ at foot of this article).

But throughout 2017 and 2018 any reasonable observer could see through such endless delays from the plaintiff  – all just attritional tactics.

The Penn State professor had persistently refused to honor the binding “concessions” agreement he made to Ball which ultimately gave his legal team the coup de grace to win the case  for the defendant due to Mann’s ‘Bad Faith’ (see: legal definition here).

Dr. Ball always argued that those numbers, if examined in open court, would have conclusively proved Mann was motivated to commit a criminal fraud. It was at this point legal minds could discern Ball was closing in on victory – a triumph for ‘David over Goliath.’

And Mann certainly is a science ‘Goliath.’ Ever since featuring so famously in the UN IPCC 2001 Third Assessment Report (TAR) Mann’s graph has been an iconic image cited relentlessly by environmentalists clamoring for urgent action on man-made global warming.

For the past two decades the biased mainstream media has acclaimed Mann as “a world-leading climate scientist” and last year he was heralded as their champion to help dethrone “climate denier” President Trump.

Indeed, not just a fawning MSM, but many hundreds of subsequent climate studies have relied on Mann’s findings. Mann’s reputation was such, that most climate researchers merely accepted his graph, a typical example of groupthink.

Dr Ball has long warned that if the world was permitted to see behind the secrecy they would be shocked at just how corrupt and self-serving are those ‘scientists’ at the forefront of man-made global warming propaganda.

As anyone can tell by contrasting and comparing the graphs below (Mann’s version top, Ball’s below) it is obvious there exists a massive discrepancy in the respective findings.

Above: contrast and compare Dr Mann’s dodgy graph with Dr Ball’s more reliable version (based on that of the renowned H. H. Lamb) and see how Mann fraudulently altered the proxy climate date with a ‘hockey stick’ shape to falsely show the dramatic uptick with modern temperatures rising ‘catastrophically’ to fit the fake UN IPCC doomsaying narrative.

Have Skeptics Ever Proven that Mann’s Graph was Deliberately Faked?

Answer: No. This is because Mann has always  refused to release his R2 regression numbers for independent examination.

He claimed his secrecy was justified because he held “proprietary rights” over them (i.e. personally valuable intellectual work product, you see).  So “valuable” to Mann was the secrecy of his metadata that losing a multi-million dollar lawsuit and his reputation was the ultimate price he was prepared to pay.

While steep, I guess, that’s preferable to serving a long federal prison stretch, right?

Before Ball’s glorious court victory, little more could be conclusively proven other than the hockey stick graph uptick stupidly (and unscientifically) relies on the proxy evidence from the tree rings of a single Yamal larch!

Mann could thus sleep safe in the knowledge that as long as statistical experts remain deprived of any conclusive proof of his intent to defraud, they could only find him guilty of incompetence.

Putting Mann’s Fraudulent Graph Under the Microscope

For an easy-viewing summary by Tim Ball please watch the video:

Mann’s goal was to make the Little Ice Age (LIA) disappear, as we explained in our previous article on this issue. The LIA was an especially cold era that ended around 1840 and since then global temperatures have gradually risen. But government ‘experts’ like Mann have sought to use statistical trickery to make such natural variation appear as ‘man-made’ warming.

Apart from playing with statistics Mann made his proxy fit the thermometer data by adding thermometer values to the proxy values known as “Mike’s trick” in the climate gate email scandal.

From the emails released during the Climategate scandal Professor Phil Jones, Britain’s top climate scientist at the University of East Anglia was shown to have written the following to his alarmist colleagues (some analysis here).

The email, sent by Prof Phil Jones of the CRU in 1999, states:

Dear Ray, Mike and Malcolm,
Once Tim’s got a diagram here we’ll send that either later today or
first thing tomorrow.
I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps
to each series for the last 20 years
 (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from
1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline. Mike’s series got the annual
land and marine values while the other two got April-Sept for NH land
N of 20N. The latter two are real for 1999, while the estimate for 1999
for NH combined is +0.44C wrt 61-90. The Global estimate for 1999 with
data through Oct is +0.35C cf. 0.57 for 1998.
Thanks for the comments, Ray.

Cheers
Phil

This has the Hockey Stick Graph showing the same cooling from 1942 to 1975 as the HadCRUT3 data as posted in the IPCC 2001 AR3

In 1942 there was just 4.0Gt of emissions increasing to 17.1Gt by 1975 but since this 425% increase in CO2 emissions didn’t cause any global warming during this 33 year period; the conjecture of CO2 emissions induced (catastrophic) global warming was proven false.

Readers interested in gaining a deeper understanding of what is likely to eventually be exposed as a criminal conspiracy between Mann and other ‘elite’ researchers should see “The Hockey Stick Illusion” by Andrew Montford.

The Guardian newspaper (above) expressing doubts over ‘(Michael) Mann-made’ global warming.

Victory that Comes at Great Personal Cost

Behind the scenes, gathering the resources, mental, scientific and financial, there is an untold burden of defending these cynical SLAPP suits.

Lest readers forget, it is mostly in the service of misguided public policy, with massive funding and connivance from political operators in play, that fake scientists like Michael Mann and Andrew Weaver acquired such esteemed public positions.

They are not only despicable human beings they are a disgrace to all decent scientists.

Readers will be aware that this author has been a staunch friend and ally to Tim throughout the hardships of this protracted 8-year legal battle.

Our reputations were routinely trashed by our enemies, so it is sweet justice that the court has now given legal credence to Tim’s famous words that Michael Mann “belongs in the state pen, not Penn State,” a comical reference to the fraudulent ‘hockey stick’ graph that knowledgeable scientists knew to be fakery.

[Author Note: Being very much a party to these legal proceedings (having provided Dr Ball with the financial security of a legally-binding indemnity in the event Tim lost) it is a monumental vindication of my faith in Tim’s cause. In effect, I ‘bet the farm’ on Tim winning, as graciously reported by Jo Nova (below)]

Knowingly Fraudulent and Corrupt

During 2018, while Tim Ball’s hard work was winning “concessions” from Mann’s legal team in Canada, south of the border, (on April 20) a shameless Mann wrote in Scientific American this utter nonsense:

“Yet, in the 20 years since the original hockey stick publication, independent studies, again and again, have overwhelmingly reaffirmed our findings, including the key conclusion: recent warming is unprecedented over at least the past millennium.”

Gullible and brainwashed greens and the many self-serving politicians swallowed up this garbage.

Dr Ball Expresses Gratitude to Principia Scientific International

Speaking in this 2018 video on the gravity of what some scientists have called “The science trial of the Century,” Dr Ball revealed his gratitude to his colleagues at Principia Scientific:

Dr Tim Ball:

 I know John O’Sullivan who set up the Principia site and I know I wrote a foreword and a chapter in one of the books they produced called Slaying the Sky Dragon.

John O’Sullivan comes from his anti-government [stance], very legitimately and unfortunately, it’s not until you’ve actually directly personally experienced that; challenging the government – that you realize how nasty they can get. So John knows very well how nasty these things can get – that anyone that dares to challenge the authorities.

And so, Principia was set up for that reason, and John was the one that helped me set up the PayPal so people could help me financially so, that’s my disclaimer with that.”

As Jo Nova reported on the joannenova.com.au blog:

“John O’Sullivan is putting in above and beyond what any single skeptical soul ought to.

He’s already been a key figure helping Tim Ball in the legal fight with the UVA establishment, which has spent over a million dollars helping Michael Mann to hide emails. The case was launched by Michael Mann, but could turn out to do a huge favor to skeptics — the discovery process is a powerful tool, and we all know who has been hiding their methods, their data, and their work-related correspondence.

Tim Ball and John O’Sullivan are helping all the free citizens of the West. The burden should not be theirs alone. There are many claims for help at the moment, but that is a sign that the grand scam is coming to a head.  Jo”

Two out of Two Major Court Wins By Ball Versus Junk IPCC Scientists

Dr Ball, now affirmed as a courageous champion of honest science, has assured his place in the annals of real climate science. His gift to the world was sacrificing eight of his senior years, when he could have been enjoying his retirement, to exposing key players in the biggest science fraud of all time.

People too easily forget Dr Ball has defeated in expensive legal battles not just one top UN IPCC climate scientists, but two!

This latest victory is the second this champion of climate skepticism has enjoyed in the last 18 months in this same jurisdiction – both for “defamation,” both multi-million dollar climate science claims.

We reported (February 15, 2018) on Dr Ball’s first crucial courtroom win against Dr Andrew Weaver (photo, above), another elite junk scientist (a UN IPCC Lead Author in climate modeling) and British Columbia Green Party Leader.

Pointedly, at the time, Dr Ball wanted to emphasize an extremely salient fact:

Roger D. McConchie

“While I savor the victory, people need to know that it was the second of three lawsuits all from the same lawyer,Roger McConchie, (photo, left) in Vancouver on behalf of members of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).”

In effect, there is more than mere coincidence that Dr Ball, a world-leading skeptical climatologist, was systematically targeted for legal retribution time and again by political groups such as the unscrupulous Climate Science Legal Defense Fund .

As a retired scientist in his 80’s, Tim was a ‘soft target’ and the stress of these lawsuits put an enormous toll on his health.

Not to be outdone, Tim has used his time wisely to write a damning book of the 30-year back story of the great climate fraud titled ‘The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science’ and I heartily recommend that interested readers buy it.

It is also not often reported that the funding in Canada for these extravagant SLAPP lawsuits is believed to be from the David Suzuki Foundation, a hot house for extreme environmental advocacy and Big Green policy promotion.

Giving Back - Hugh Culver

What is a ‘Strategic lawsuit against public participation’ (SLAPP Suit)?

Wikipedia offers a fair definition:

“A strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP) is a lawsuit that is intended to censor, intimidate, and silence critics by burdening them with the cost of a legal defense until they abandon their criticism or opposition.[1] Such lawsuits have been made illegal in many jurisdictions on the grounds that they impede freedom of speech.

In the typical SLAPP, the plaintiff does not normally expect to win the lawsuit. The plaintiff’s goals are accomplished if the defendant succumbs to fear, intimidation, mounting legal costs, or simple exhaustion and abandons the criticism. In some cases, repeated frivolous litigation against a defendant may raise the cost of directors and officers liability insurance for that party, interfering with an organization’s ability to operate.[2] A SLAPP may also intimidate others from participating in the debate.”

Update (August 24, 2019):

Dr Mann Has Posted On Twitter In Reply To This Article:

Mann’s statement is here: https://twitter.com/MichaelEMann/status/1164910044414189568

In short, Mann’s ugly responsive legal statement is (a) stark admission he lost fair and square, and (b) a disingenuous argument that the Dismissal was granted merely on the basis of Mann’s “delay” in not submitting his R2 numbers in timely fashion.

Well, Mikey, You Are The Plaintiff And Tim Gave You Over 8 YEARS To Get Your Case Together!

On that point, this is where readers may wish to refer to the article ‘Fatal Courtroom Act Ruins Michael ‘Hockey Stick’ Mann‘ (July 4, 2017). In it we offered analysis as to Mann’s fatal legal error. As Dr Ball explained at that time:

“Michael Mann moved for an adjournment of the trial scheduled for February 20, 2017. We had little choice because Canadian courts always grant adjournments before a trial in their belief that an out of court settlement is preferable. We agreed to an adjournment with conditions. The major one was that he [Mann] produce all documents including computer codes by February 20th, 2017. He failed to meet the deadline.”

As I explained in the article, Mann (and his crooked lawyer) had shown bad faith, thereby rendering his case liable for dismissal. I urged Tim to pursue that winning tactic and thankfully he did.


AN APPEAL

Assisting Dr Ball has been a huge honor for me and probably one of the greatest achievements of my life. But Tim only won this famous courtroom battle thanks to massive worldwide grassroots support.

We can only continue to fight these protracted lawsuits with your kind support. Please give generously to ensure we can take on more crucial cases, such as this.

 [WWG1WGA]

PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL, legally registered in the UK as a company incorporated for charitable purposes. Head Office: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. 

Please DONATE TODAY To Help Our Non-Profit Mission To Defend The Scientific Method.

_________________

**Comment**

You may ask why in the world such an article appears on a website for Lyme/MSIDS patients. Please let me answer that by stating that on a near daily basis, research is crossing my desk in which the terms “Climate Change” and ticks or Lyme are in the titles despite research showing ticks are marvelously ecoadaptive and have survived for eons by seeking out leaf litter, snow, or anything that will offer protection.

Recently an independent tick researcher pointed out blatantly faulty research:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/06/17/ontario-public-health-officials-called-out-on-shoddy-biased-research-utilizing-an-erroneous-climate-change-model-to-program-a-futuristic-tick-problem/

Despite the continued verbiage that warmer temperatures are moving ticks northward, it’s been proven that warmer winters are lethal to ticks: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/08/13/study-shows-lyme-not-propelled-by-climate-change/

There are numerous holes in researchers’ theories and Scott points out ticks are in places devoid of the white-footed mouse as well as the fact what researchers predict to happen in the future has already happened in Canada:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/11/07/ticks-on-the-move-due-to-migrating-birds-and-photoperiod-not-climate-change/

Lastly, Dr. Patrick Michaels, director of the Center for the Study of Science at the Cato Institute, who also happens to be a PhD in ecological climatology from the University of Wisconsin at Madison, in this informative interview provides insight into the debate over climate change and the political games played to create policy:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/11/17/uw-madison-phd-in-ecological-climatology-climate-change-computer-models-fudged-except-russian-model/