Archive for the ‘Activism’ Category

Massachusetts Makes AGS a Reportable Illness

https://www.capeandislands.org/local-news/2026-03-23/state-will-start-tracking-cases-of-tick-borne-mammal-product-allergy

State will start tracking cases of tick-borne mammal product allergy

CAI | By Gilda Geist
Published March 23, 2026
Governor Maura Healey (at the podium) announced that alpha-gal syndrome will become a reportable condition in Massachusetts at the Frances A. Crane Wildlife Management Area in North Falmouth. Massachusetts Public Health Commissioner Dr. Robbie Goldstein (leftmost person standing) spoke about the importance of collecting data on the emerging condition.

Gilda Geist / CAI
Governor Maura Healey (at the podium) announced that alpha-gal syndrome will become a reportable condition in Massachusetts at the Frances A. Crane Wildlife Management Area in North Falmouth. Massachusetts Public Health Commissioner Dr. Robbie Goldstein (leftmost person standing) spoke about the importance of collecting data on the emerging condition.

Starting April 1, Massachusetts health care providers and labs will be required to alert the state when they encounter cases of the tick-borne allergy alpha-gal syndrome.

Alpha-gal syndrome is an allergy to mammal products that can be caused by a lone star tick bite. It’s been on the rise on Cape Cod and the Islands, to the point where it’s caught the attention of the governor’s office.

At a press conference in North Falmouth last week, Governor Maura Healey announced that alpha-gal syndrome will be considered a reportable condition for at least the next year. The designation will make it easier for the state to collect data on alpha-gal syndrome, which at this time has no treatment.

“As the global life sciences capital of the world, I hope that somehow our data and our collection can be used with science and research right now in our state to eradicate this once and for all,” Healey said.

Massachusetts Public Health Commissioner Dr. Robbie Goldstein was also at the event. Until recently, he said, there were no lone star ticks in Massachusetts. But climate change has made Massachusetts hospitable to lone star ticks, named for the single white dot on their backs.

“Warmer temperatures, shorter winters [and] shifting ecosystems all have allowed the lone star tick to crawl—literally crawl—northward,” he said. “We’re seeing that expansion now on Cape Cod, on Martha’s Vineyard and on Nantucket. And increasingly, we’re seeing it in the mainland.”

Barnstable County has been working closely with public health partners on the Vineyard, where alpha-gal syndrome has emerged as a significant concern.

“By taking this data-driven, proactive approach, we are doing more than just simply responding to an emerging public health challenge,” Goldstein said. “We are helping people prevent alpha-gal syndrome.”

Alpha-gal is a sugar molecule that is in most mammals, but not humans. It’s also in the saliva of lone star ticks. When someone is bitten by a lone star tick, the alpha-gal in the tick’s saliva can get into the person’s bloodstream. The body’s immune system can see the presence of alpha-gal as a threat, causing an allergic reaction that is triggered when people are exposed to alpha-gal in the future by consuming mammal products. That can include meat and dairy, as well as non-food products, such as some medications that contain mammal additives or stabilizers. (See link for article)

_____________

**Comment**

I will refrain from my regular diatribe, but ticks are impervious to weather:

Researchers and the Media are beholden to Big Pharma and government – pretty much their main funders.  They understand who butters their bread and that they must toe the lie to get those hotly contested research dollars. This requires them to regurgitate the accepted narrative, even though it’s been proven wrong, again and again.

It’s now been exposed that billionaires under the guise of philanthropy have financed research portals to control scientific discourse and that a carefully planned 20 year architecture is behind ‘pandemics’ as a business model.

Big money is behind the faulty climate change narrative and it seems researchers care more about their paychecks than facts.

Just as it’s far more likely that geoengineering is behind deleterious weather conditions, not to mention health issues, it’s also far more likely that the government’s deployment of radioactive lone star ticks in Virginia have more to do with tick dispersement than the weather.

Lone star ticks have been found in Minnesota, Wisconsin and up into Maine.

Then, there’s the very real issue that ticks are not the sole perp in this drama:

More on AGS:

Category:

Activism, Alpha Gal Meat Allergy, Climate, Ticks

Pfizer’s Former Chief Toxicologist: COVID Jab “Should Never Have Been Approved”

This should be spread FAR AND WIDE…..

http://  Approx. 5 Min

Former Pfizer Chief Toxicologist

Dr. Helmut Sterz

3/22/26

Virologist and former Pfizer toxicology chief Dr. Helmut Sterz speaks at German Covid inquiry on the COVID mRNA injections.

Important points:

  • Underreporting puts the death toll from the Comirnaty (Pfizer) COVID shots from between 20,000 to 60,000 Germans.  This number does not include COVID shots produced by other manufacturers.
  • Carcinogenic risk was not studied for ‘time reasons’ and no alternative studies have been conducted.
  • The rat reproduction study was defective so no reliable results of the effect of the shots on pregnancy or subsequent development could be given
    • This recent rat study shows pregnant rats that received the COVID-19 mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine during gestation had offspring with autism-like behaviors, decreased neuronal counts, and impaired motor performance. 
  • Essential toxicology studies were sacrificed to speed without acceptable reasons.
  • Robert Koch Institute (RKI) noted that side effects and adverse effects should be checked only after market launch.
  • Pfizer’s post marketing report gave over 1,200 suspected deaths within only two months after approval.
  • The Paul Elriche institute received so far 2,133 reports of death after Comirnaty.
  • There is a high number of unreported cases due to under reporting so deaths are likely much higher.
  • Pfizer’s documentation does not reveal a positive risk benefit ratio.
  • Mathematician Robert Rockenfeller from the University of Koblenz states that for every severe case of COVID allegedly prevented, there were 25 serious side effects.
  • Mortality increased from 2021 and 2022 compared to 2020.  If the vaccine was effective mortality would have decreased.
  • Vaccine purity was too expensive for mass production so the population received a shot with the help of a bacterium Escherichia coli (E. coli) and the result was significant impurities with bacteria of the DNA and the consequence could be a considerably increased cancer risk.

https://dailytelegraph.co.nz/news/pfizers-former-chief-toxicologist-says-covid-jab-should-never-have-been-approved/

Pfizer’s former chief toxicologist says COVID jab “should never have been approved”

A hearing in the German Bundestag has triggered fresh controversy over the approval and safety of COVID-19 mRNA ‘vaccines’, after a former chief Pfizer toxicologist confirmed that critical safety testing was bypassed during development.

March 24, 2026 Daily Telegraph NZ

Speaking at the Corona Investigation session on March 19, 2026, Dr Helmut Sterz said “essential toxicity studies were sacrificed to speed, without acceptable reasons,” adding that the vaccine’s approval effectively resulted in “prohibited human trials.”

The claims were presented during a session organised by an opposition-led committee, with reports indicating the testimony was limited to a brief five-minute window.  (See link for article)

Category:

Activism, research, vaccines, Viruses

When ‘Avoid Hospitals At All Costs’ Isn’t An Option

The following article is in response to the advice to ‘avoid hospitals at all cost‘ due to the horrifically unscientific and deadly Fauci death protocol seen during COVID tyranny where up to 70% of covid deaths were due to ventilators, with the rest being knocked off by remdesivir, aka ‘run death is near‘.

To my knowledge the PREP Act in place during COVID was NOT removed, which means it’s still being used and will be used on you should you enter hospital corridors.  They are also tricking patients into getting all the jabs post haste as explained in the article below.

https://jennasside.rocks/p/when-avoid-hospitals-at-all-costs

When “Avoid Hospitals at All Costs” Isn’t an Option

Here’s how to protect yourself in a worst-case scenario.
Mar 19, 2026

Article Excerpts:

At some point after Obamacare shoved “free preventive care” into law, hospitals and insurers quietly realized they were in a bit of a pickle: they couldn’t meet their new vaccine-quota incentives if they had to stop and get explicit consent every single time. To streamline operations, hospital networks allegedly began “updating” their intake forms, wrapping the common word vaccine into the regulatory term biologic—a word almost no normal person uses or understands. Why? Because if the form says “I consent to necessary biologics,” and you sign it, hospitals can claim you already said yes to every jab under the sun.

It wasn’t an accident. It wasn’t confusion. It was a deliberate paperwork workaround to speed up compliance and eliminate refusals. Insurance companies wanted higher vaccination numbers. Hospitals wanted better reimbursement rates. Administrators wanted fewer arguments. So they buried the consent under a word no one recognized, and voila—problem solved.

Since the nurse wished to remain anonymous, Laura volunteered to share her I Do Not Consent Form, turning it into a free, customizable, downloadable medical directive designed to protect patients from hospital tomfoolery.

Laura soon launched a website, which she runs with Stanford-trained anesthesiologist Dr. Margaret Aranda. The site includes the form along with precise instructions for filling it out and delivering it (hint: you can’t just casually hand it to an orderly) in order to make sure it becomes a legally binding, permanent part of your medical record.“

In a hospital, if your ‘No’ is not documented in the chart, your ‘No’ isn’t guaranteed,” adds Dr. Aranda. “The I Do Not Consent Form makes your wishes official and enforceable.”

(See link for article, go to the ‘do not consent form’, print off, fill, and notorize – making sure to deliver it exactly as specified.)

 

 

 

Category:

Activism, Treatment, vaccines

’60 Minutes’ RF Investigation & Limits at Least 200 Times Too High to Protect Against Cancer Risks

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/60-minutes-investigation-fuels-debate-rf-radiation-5g

‘60 Minutes’ Investigation Fuels Debate Over RF Radiation and 5G

U.S. agents secretly obtained a portable microwave weapon capable of causing injuries similar to those seen in Havana Syndrome cases, according to a “60 Minutes” investigation. Miriam Eckenfels of Children’s Health Defense said the report highlights striking parallels between Havana Syndrome and symptoms linked to EMR exposure. “We should be paying attention,” she said.

by Jill Erzen
March 16, 2026
man holding head and words "havana syndrome"

U.S. agents secretly purchased a portable microwave weapon capable of causing brain injuries like those reported in Havana Syndrome cases, according to a new investigation by “60 Minutes.”

The device — small enough to carry in a backpack and powerful enough to send a beam through walls and windows — was reportedly obtained from a Russian criminal network in a covert 2024 operation funded by the U.S. Department of Defense.

U.S. officials tested the still-classified weapon for more than a year at a military laboratory. Experiments on rats and sheep produced injuries similar to those reported by American diplomats, intelligence officers and military personnel who say they were “struck by an unseen force.”

Since 2016, hundreds of possible Havana Syndrome incidents have been reported around the world — and even inside the U.S. Some reportedly occurred near the White House and at CIA headquarters in Virginia.

Victims describe sudden attacks that feel like a powerful force striking the head.

One former Air Force officer told “60 Minutes” he was hit five times in five months in 2020, all in his own home in northern Virginia.

“The second attack, I was standing in my kitchen looking out at the back woods, and it felt like an immediate vice on my head. Immediately disoriented, confused and dizzy,” he said.

“The fifth one was by far the worst … I woke up with a full body convulsion. The worst pain I have ever felt. It felt like a vice gripping my brain stem was there,” he said.

Others reported piercing ear pain, vertigo, ringing in the ears, headaches and lasting neurological damage.

‘People all over the country’ are getting sick

Millions of people report headaches, insomnia, heart palpitations and other symptoms when exposed to electromagnetic radiation (EMR).

Scientists often describe clusters of symptoms linked to high exposure to electromagnetic fields as EMR Syndrome, “microwave syndrome” or RF sickness.

According to Miriam Eckenfels, director of the EMR & Wireless Program at Children’s Health Defense, the “60 Minutes” report highlights a key detail: The weapon appears to rely on specific patterns of pulsed radiofrequency (RF) radiation.

“The piece shows that Havana Syndrome is linked to ‘unique’ pulsation and modulation of RF radiation,” Eckenfels said. “That’s important because 5G technology also relies on pulsation and modulation.”

She said the overlap helps explain why people around the country report experiencing symptoms after exposure to wireless infrastructure.

“We’re hearing from people all over the country who say they’re getting sick at an increasingly fast pace when exposed to 5G towers and antennas,” Eckenfels said.

Symptoms of Havana Syndrome mirror EMR sickness 

Scientists have suspected for years that microwave radiation could be responsible for at least some of the Havana Syndrome injuries.

“The most plausible explanation for a subset of these cases was a form of radio frequency or microwave energy,” said Dr. David A. Relman, a physician at Stanford University who led government investigations into the mysterious illness in the early 2020s.

Microwaves, part of the electromagnetic spectrum, power everyday technologies, including radar, Wi-Fi and cellphones. Researchers have studied their biological effects for decades.

Relman said earlier research — much of it conducted in the former Soviet Union — explored how pulsed microwave energy could disrupt the brain and nervous system.

Those experiments showed the radiation could trigger “loss of consciousness to seizures to memory lapses, inability to concentrate, headaches, intense pressure, pain, disorientation, difficulty with balance,” Relman said.

Many of those symptoms closely match what Havana Syndrome victims report.

“When you produce pulses like this, you can actually stimulate electrically active tissue like brain tissue,” Relman said.

Eckenfels said the list of symptoms also mirrors those reported by people suffering from EMR exposure.

“The symptoms we hear from Havana Syndrome victims — tinnitus, cognitive impairment, brain fog, trouble sleeping, hearing loss, headaches and dizziness — are all well-documented symptoms of EMR sickness linked to radiofrequency radiation from cellphones and towers,” she said. “The parallels are striking, and we should be paying attention.”

However, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine reviewed the illnesses reported by U.S. diplomats in Cuba in 2016 and later in China, and stopped short of blaming microwave weapons.

According to its 2020 report, there were “multiple hypotheses” as to what caused the symptoms, “but evidence has been lacking, no hypothesis has been proven and the circumstances remain unclear.”

Pentagon introduced weapon using targeted waves in 2001

According to “60 Minutes,” the weapon obtained by U.S. investigators can operate silently and does not produce the noticeable heat associated with a microwave oven.

The device can be programmed to emit rapidly pulsing electromagnetic waves and can be controlled remotely from hundreds of feet away. Investigators say the beam can penetrate materials such as glass and drywall.  (See link for article and ’60 Minutes’ report)

____________

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/wireless-radiation-limits-at-least-200-times-too-high-to-protect-against-cancer-risks/?

Wireless Radiation Limits at Least 200 Times Too High to Protect Against Cancer Risks

Wireless radiation safety limits are at least 200 times too high to protect people from cancer risks, according to a study published March 14 in Environmental Health. Current limits are also 8 to 24 times too high to protect against male reproductive harm, including decreased sperm count, sperm vitality and testosterone levels, the scientists concluded.

by Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D.
March 17, 2026
wireless radiation symbol and word "cancer"

Safety limits for radiofrequency (RF) radiation emitted by cellphones, Wi-Fi routers, cell towers and other wireless devices are at least 200 times too high to protect people from cancer risk, according to scientists with the International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF).

Current limits are also 8 to 24 times too high to protect against male reproductive harm, including decreased sperm count, sperm vitality and testosterone levels, the scientists concluded.

“Current FCC and ICNIRP public exposure limits need to be reduced by at least 200 times to maintain an acceptable environmental cancer risk of 1 in 100,000,” according to a press release citing the March 14 report in Environmental Health.

The researchers noted that the Federal Communications Commission  (FCC) and the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) set their wireless radiation safety limits based on a handful of studies from the 1980s.

The studies, which had small sample sizes, measured only the short-term impact of RF radiation at levels high enough to heat human tissue.

In the U.S., the FCC sets the wireless radiation limits. Many other countries base their limits on ICNIRP’s recommendations.

ICNIRP is a self-selecting group with “longstanding industry ties that is accountable to no one,” according to the Environmental Health Trust.

Ronald Melnick, Ph.D., a retired toxicologist from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and the study’s lead author, said in the ICBE-EMF press release that governments need to “step up, abandon these obsolete guidelines, and conduct rigorous risk assessments using modern toxicological data.”

Joel Moskowitz, Ph.D., director of the Center for Family and Community Health at the University of California, Berkeley, and one of the study’s authors, said, “We are constantly surrounded by devices emitting wireless radiation; yet government regulations do not account for the chronic, low-level exposures they create.”

For their report, Melnick and Moskowitz applied standard risk-assessment methods developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to research on RF radiation conducted during the last 30 years.

They found that current wireless radiation limits would need to be drastically altered to protect people, assuming people were exposed 8 hours a day to wireless radiation.

“The science is there; now we need the policy to catch up so we can protect public and occupational health,” Melnick said.

Melnick and Moskowitz authored the study on behalf of ICBE-EMF, a “consortium of scientists, doctors and related professionals” who study wireless radiation and recommend wireless radiation exposure guidelines “based on the best peer-reviewed scientific research publications.”

FCC continues to defy 2021 court order that it review its safety limits

The study comes as the FCC continues to defy a 2021 court order to provide a better explanation for how its current limits — which haven’t been updated since 1996 — adequately protect human health.

The court order directed the FCC to review 11,000 pages of evidence  supporting claims that wireless radiation at levels currently allowed by the FCC harms people — especially kids — and the environment.

Meanwhile, the FCC has proposed a rule change that, if adopted, would allow for the uncontrolled proliferation of new cell towers. U.S. lawmakers are advancing a bill that would accomplish the same thing.

“The fact that the FCC has not only failed to comply with the court order, but is accelerating deployment of wireless infrastructure in the meantime, is outrageous,” said  Miriam Eckenfels, director of CHD’s Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) & Wireless Program.  (See link for article)

For more:

Category:

Activism

‘Trump America AI Act’ Repeals Section 230, Expands Liability, & Establishes Centralized Federal Control Over AI Systems

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/trump-america-ai-act-repeals-section?

‘TRUMP AMERICA AI Act’ Repeals Section 230, Expands Liability, and Establishes Centralized Federal Control Over AI Systems

Substack and similar platforms could face legal exposure for user-generated content as Section 230 repeal removes their core liability shield, forcing stricter content control to avoid lawsuits.
Jon Fleetwood
Mar 19, 2026

U.S. President Donald J. Trump (left) and Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-TN; right)

U.S. Senator Marsha Blackburn has released a 291-page legislative framework that would repeal Section 230, expand liability across the artificial intelligence ecosystem, and establish a unified federal rulebook governing how AI systems are built, deployed, and controlled in the United States.

The proposal—titled the TRUMP AMERICA AI Act—is being presented as a pro-innovation, pro-safety measure designed to “protect children, creators, conservatives, and communities” while ensuring U.S. dominance in the global AI race.

But the actual structure of the bill reveals a comprehensive system that centralizes regulatory authority, expands legal exposure for platforms, and creates new mechanisms for controlling AI outputs and digital information flows.

For independent journalists and publishers operating on platforms like Substack, the repeal of Section 230 shifts the risk upstream.

Platforms would no longer be shielded from liability tied to user-generated content, meaning they must evaluate whether hosting certain reporting could expose them to lawsuits.

In practice, that creates pressure to restrict or deprioritize content that could be framed as causing harm—particularly reporting on public health, government programs, or other high-stakes issues—regardless of whether it is sourced or accurate.  (See link for article)

Important excerpts:

The practical effect is that once liability protections are removed, platforms are no longer free to host content neutrally.

They must actively manage and restrict content—or risk being sued……

….the bill shifts risk away from the speaker and onto the infrastructure that distributes their work.

That means companies like Substack are no longer simply hosting content—they are legally exposed to it.

The move follows warnings from a bipartisan coalition of 40 state attorneys general that similar efforts to centralize AI authority at the federal level would strip states of their ability to protect citizens and override hundreds of existing state laws.

The White House document is not vague about the shift.

It directly calls for removing states from core areas of AI governance and placing that authority in Washington.

The language is unusually blunt, laying out—in plain terms—a plan to cut states out of decision-making entirely.

Trump is asking Congress to pass a law that removes states from AI regulation and places that authority in Washington—while at the same time backing massive AI infrastructure consolidation through Stargate and supporting legislation that builds a single federal rulebook for AI and online content.

Together, these moves concentrate control over AI systems, data, and information flows at the federal level, where that authority does not reset with elections—it transfers intact to whoever holds power next.  Source

______________

**Comment**

It’s easy to see the hand writing on the wall with this. 

People aren’t dumb and writing platforms will simply not want to take risks on content that could subject them to legal actions – particularly by a government with endless pockets to pursue them.

Also remember that the COVID response was a federal response and states and hospitals simply cow-towed to its directives.  The same tyranny we saw with COVID, WILL be repeated if this passes.  The same life-saving information that came out during COVID will systematically be stamped out by whoever’s in power at the time.

Category:

Activism