Madison Area Lyme Support Group

Executive Summary

If you have a policy of COVID testing where it is mandatory to test the unvaccinated 2x/week but the vaccinated can totally skip testing, this can massively skew all studies based on that data.

I just found out this was the case in the Czech Republic which is the only country where we have record level data.

That explains a lot, doesn’t it? A testing policy like that can make an ineffective vaccine close to perfect.

Bottom line: the only honest way to see if the vaccine worked is to compare the whole period all-cause mortality between those who got the shots and those who did not. Then you learn the truth.

Guess what? There isn’t a single study that does this.Zero. Zip. Nada.

So I calculated it for the Czech Republic. It shows that the vaccines should be stopped. But you already knew that, didn’t you?

And if you can’t get COVID, you can’t die from COVID!

BAM! The magic trick has been revealed. The next time you want to make a vaccine super effective, there is nothing like deploying a differential testing policy like this.

Therefore, in Czechia, you get a near perfect vaccine and can write papers about it and nobody is the wiser.  (See link for article)

_______________

**Comment**

These tactics need to be continually exposed for what they are: false and misleading – constituting scientific fraud.  Those in public health should be reviewing these things before they roll out a drug or medical product of any kind.

Hirsch then shows a table (to access, click top link) that shows when you actually compare whole period all-cause mortality between the injected and the non-injected you discover the shots are killing people.  But, reality is already showing this for those paying attention.

For more:

• https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2021/09/10/us-covid-vaccines-proven-to-cause-more-harm-than-good-based-on-pivotal-clinical-trial-data-analyzed-using-the-proper-scientific-endpoint-all-cause-severe-morbidity/  We were warned way back in 2021 by Dr. J. Bart Classen that the shots cause more harm than good based on trial data that used the proper endpoint: all cause severe morbidity.  Crickets…..
• https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2021/08/24/first-signs-of-what-scientists-fear-most-about-covid-jabs-german-physicians-examine-covid-vaxxed-blood-its-not-good/  Within this link we learn of another statistical magic trick deployed for the clot shots:  not using absolute risk reduction for efficacy.  Look at the difference between relative and absolute risk:
  • Pfizer/BioNTech — Relative risk reduction: 95%
  • Absolute risk reduction: 0.84%
  • Moderna — Relative risk reduction: 94%
  • Absolute risk reduction: 1.2%
  • Gamaleya (Sputnic V) — Relative risk reduction: 91%
  • Absolute risk reduction: 0.93%
  • Johnson & Johnson — Relative risk reduction: 67%
  • Absolute risk reduction: 1.2%
  • AstraZeneca/Oxford — Relative risk reduction: 67%
  • Absolute risk reduction: 1.3%
• https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2023/03/13/peer-reviewed-paper-the-mrna-vaccines-are-neither-safe-nor-effective-but-outright-dangerous/
  • Here’s the two sentences from the paper that everyone should read:
    

    A worldwide Bayesian causal Impact analysis suggests that COVID-19 gene therapy (mRNA vaccine) causesmore COVID-19 cases per million and more non-Covid deaths per million than are associated with COVID-19 [43].

    An abundance of studies has shown that the mRNA vaccines are neither safe nor effective, but outright dangerous.

• https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2023/01/03/reanalysis-of-mrna-trial-data-1-serious-event-per-800-vaccinees/  An independent reanalysis of trial data: 1 serious event per 800 shots.
• https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2022/07/01/study-shows-pfizer-moderna-shots-more-likely-to-cause-serious-injury-than-reduce-risk-of-covid-related-hospitalization/
• https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2022/06/24/worse-than-the-disease-reviewing-some-possible-unintended-consequences-of-mrna-vaccines-against-covid-19-fda-cdc-lying-about-vax-deaths-injuries/  Please remember that according to a FOIA request, the CDC has admitted it never monitored VAERS for COVID injection safety signals. Director of the CDC, Dr. Rochelle Walensky, also admits health officials relied too heavily on ‘vaccines’ as a cure-all for COVID and then promptly blames ‘vaccine’ makers for not warning the agency that the shots would be less effective against variants.  She also admits that the science is far from being ‘settled’ and is ‘gray instead of black and white’, despite the narrative told to the public for the past two years that the science IS settled and that the COVID jabs are safe and effective.

People have been shouting about these death shots for years.  There’s plenty of published science showing the myriad of problems.

Two White Papers Call For COVID Shot Halt

The IPAK-EDU White Paper 2025-ENDEUA states that when corrected efficacy curves and suppressed risks are taken into account, the mRNA covid shots fail the EUA standard.  The shots were based upon interim data from large-scale Phase III trials. The legal standard under §564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act requires that a product may be authorized for emergency use only if it is “reasonable to believe” that the product “may be effective” against a life-threatening condition, that the known and potential benefits outweigh the known and potential risks, and that no adequate alternatives are available. This report  demonstrates, through a rigorous retrospective analysis, that these criteria were never met.  

Go here to listen to Dr. Jeyanthi Kunadhasan, an Australian anesthesiologist and perioperative physician who was terminated from her hospital position after questioning the risk-benefit profile of COVID-19 vaccines in healthy individuals. Following her dismissal, she joined a group of international medical volunteers tasked with reviewing the 500,000+ pages of internal Pfizer documents released as part of a court-ordered FOIA request. This effort was coordinated by DailyClout and Dr. Naomi Wolf. As a result of that work, Dr. Kunadhasan has become one of the foremost experts on Pfizer’s pivotal mRNA vaccine trial, focusing specifically on discrepancies in reported deaths and adverse events.

What Dr. Kunadhasan uncovers raises grave questions about data integrity, regulatory failure, fraud, and the validity of the FDA’s EUA for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 shot.

And yet another White Paper is calling for an urgent halt on self-amplifying RNA ‘vaccine’ deployment until comprehensive safety studies are done to address contagiousness risks.  The paper discusses the significant theoretical risk including contagiousness through shedding, sexual transmission, and recombination with wild-type viruses.

FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary and head of FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Dr. Vinay Prasad, note that a number of other countries such as Australia and Germany only recommend the clot shots to certain populations while the U.S. has taken a ‘one size fits all’ approach because experts have argued Americans are too stupid to understand age-and risk-based recommendations.

But, even this approach ignores the elephant in the room: there are treatments for COVID which means a ‘vaccine’ isn’t even needed.  Then, there’s the fact they have negative efficacy.

What more is it going to take?

Evidently, a lot more……

The Food and Drug Administration issued an approval for Novavax’s Covid-19 ‘vaccine.’ This is the only non-mRNA vaccine.

The vaccine was approved for adults aged 65 and older and individuals aged 12 to 64 with at least one underlying health condition that increases their risk for severe COVID-19 outcomes. Reading the clinical trials prompts serious questions.

The trials included populations that had a single dose and populations that had two doses. The trials showed a reduction in symptomatic Covid 7 days after the second dose. But the FDA didn’t approve two doses. They only approved one. So is one dose even effective at all at preventing Covid? We don’t know, that wasn’t tested.  (Is this sounding familiar yet?)

There is also a noted risk of myocarditis and heart inflammation. There was also at least one vaccine recipient with “a serious event of Guillain Barré syndrome reported 9 days following the shot.  The FDA notes that Novavax has to follow up on any further cases if they observe it.

The FDA is also supposed to follow up on how the vaccine does when it is shipped to patients. They must submit a study called “Shipping Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 rS (JN.1 Vaccine) Drug Product in Pre-Filled Syringe (PFS) Finished Good Presentation” by July of this year.

They approve vaccines not knowing how they will fare once they are shipped to doctor’s offices. They test it on us.

Don’t forget the low prevalence of Covid.

There is good news: there are at least 16 states with pending bills seeking to ban the clot shot mandates, establish a ‘vaccine’ bill of rights, or prohibit any immunization containing mRNA material.  Some bills would require manufacturers to label foods containing mRNA, according to data compiled by Bloomberg Government.

More than 2,500 ‘vaccine’-related bills have been introduced since 2021.

And top FDA official just disclosed she never got the clot shot due to her concerns about biodistribution.  She was concerned about excretion in breast milk since she was pregnant during the COVID ‘pandemic.’  When asked if information has emerged that validates her choice, said she thinks it does, but wanted to go on record that she was not speaking on behalf of the FDA.  

Researchers reported in a 2022 paper that messenger ribonucleic acid, which is in the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 shots, was detected in human breast milk. Another paper, in 2023, detailed similar findings.

Pfizer and Moderna did not return requests for comment.

And ‘Dilbert’ comic strip creator, Scott Adams, just admitted to having the same aggressive turbo cancer as former President Biden.

“The smartest, happiest people are the ones who didn’t get the vaccination, and they’re still alive.” ~ Scott Adams, Dilbert creator

It’s getting hot in the kitchen, folks.