Madison Area Lyme Support Group

Pregnancy is a time of joy, anticipation, and careful decision-making. As an expecting mother, your primary goal is to ensure the health and safety of your baby. However, amidst the abundance of information and recommendations, it’s important to understand the potential risks associated with vaccines during pregnancy. Despite assurances from health authorities, recent evidence and expert testimonies suggest that vaccines given during pregnancy pose a significant risk to both mother and baby.

Lack of Proper Testing for Pregnant Women

One of the most concerning aspects of vaccine recommendations for pregnant women is the lack of rigorous safety testing. During a 2023 FDA meeting, Dr. Meryl Nass highlighted the troubling fact that many vaccines routinely recommended during pregnancy, including the COVID-19 vaccine, were not adequately tested in pregnant populations. The FDA admitted that its recommendations are based on limited or no data from controlled clinical trials involving pregnant women.

This absence of reliable data leaves many unanswered questions about the long-term effects of vaccines on both the developing fetus and the mother’s immune system. The decision to recommend vaccines without sufficient evidence undermines informed consent and raises serious ethical concerns.

Alarming Reports of Adverse Effects

Adverse events following vaccination during pregnancy are increasingly being reported. These include:

• Miscarriages: Some studies and anecdotal reports have linked vaccines, particularly the COVID-19 vaccine, to an increase in pregnancy losses.
• Preterm Births: Concerns have been raised about a potential connection between maternal vaccination and preterm deliveries.
• Developmental Issues: Emerging evidence suggests the possibility of long-term developmental effects on the baby, though more research is urgently needed to confirm these findings.

Dr. James Thorp, a board-certified OB-GYN, has been vocal about the risks of vaccinating pregnant women, stating that the CDC’s recommendations lack robust scientific backing. Dr. Thorp and other experts argue that the precautionary principle should guide decisions regarding vaccines during pregnancy, especially when there are alternative ways to manage risks.

The Role of Adjuvants and Ingredients

Many vaccines contain adjuvants; these are substances added to enhance immune response. Aluminum-based adjuvants, for example, have raised concerns due to their neurotoxic effects. During pregnancy, the developing fetus is particularly vulnerable to toxins, and the accumulation of such substances may interfere with normal development.

The presence of viral DNA fragments and other contaminants in vaccines has also been flagged as a risk factor. These components are not fully studied in the context of pregnancy, further complicating the risk assessment.  (See link for article)

_______________

**Comment**

Due to conflicts of interest, corrupt ‘public health’ agencies completely ignored natural immunity during the COVID debacle. Further, ‘vaccine’ safety and efficacy studies are a methodological mess, including the fact not a single childhood ‘vaccine’ was licensed based on a long-term placebo-controlled trial, that there is ZERO data on the accumulated effects of ‘vaccines,’ and the FDA relies upon the ‘vaccine’ manufacturer to do post-market surveillance to gather safety data.

There are a plethora of things you can do to make yourself a tough target for bacteria and viruses, and there are effective, safe, cheap treatments should you become ill.  ALL of which work better than ‘vaccines’ which are often ineffective, can give you the very disease they are supposed to prevent, are often contaminated, and are immune suppressing, which for Lyme/MSIDS patient can reactivate latent infections.

‘Vaccinating’ pregnant women should be a crime against humanity.

For more:

• https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2024/05/08/the-power-of-natural-immunity-covid-challenge-trials-struggle-to-infect-participants-even-at-high-doses/  This reminds me of the failed experiment to infect volunteer inmates with the Spanish flu, also known as the Great Swine Flu – to develop a ‘magic bullet’ vaccine which also caused severe adverse reactions.  ZERO people got infected despite being injected with infected lung tissue from sick or deceased patients, having infected tissue dropped in their eyes, and sprayed in the nose and mouth with infectious aerosols. Others would see mucus taken from critically ill patients and put it into the noses and throats of prisoners. In other parts of the trials, experimenters would take the blood of the sick and inject it into the healthy, to see if it was spread through infectious microorganisms in the blood.  Nobody got sick and nobody died.
  

  This should raise some questions.  What exactly were people dying from?

• https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2021/08/27/why-do-public-health-agencies-reject-natural-immunity-when-15-studies-show-its-better-follow-your-nose-to-herd-immunity/
• https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2022/11/08/natural-immunity-again-found-better-virus-hits-71-vaxxed-over-unvaxxed/  You may be asking yourself how the world came to believe that “vaccine” immunity is better than natural immunity.  It’s quite simple: the WHO quietly changed the definition of “herd immunity” to now only be acquired through “vaccines,” literally rewriting hundreds of years of scientific understanding just to push COVID injections.  “Vaccines” are the golden calf of Big Pharma and corrupt public health, which own patents on the very things they are supposed to protect the public from.
• https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2021/06/02/quit-ignoring-natural-covid-immunity/
• https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/07/10/coronavirus-why-everyone-was-wrong/  Excerpt:
  • Firstly, it was wrong to claim that this virus was novel.
  • Secondly, It was even more wrong to claim that the population would not already have some immunity against this virus.
  • Thirdly, it was the crowning of stupidity to claim that someone could have Covid-19 without any symptoms at all or even to pass the disease along without showing any symptoms whatsoever.  – Beda M Stadler
• https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2023/12/06/foia-cdc-had-no-data-prior-to-vaccine-recommendation-for-the-naturally-immune-ag-sues-pfizer/
•  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2021/10/08/natural-vs-vaccine-immunity-does-the-covid-19-vaccine-wipe-out-natural-immunity/