The mainstream media IGNORED this!
Massive covid conference in Stockholm.
UPDATE: A previous version of this article used the word “liquid nanoparticles,” however the correct term is lipid nanoparticles.
If you have only been reading the mainstream media, you would not have heard about what just happened in Stockholm this weekend.
There was a massive conference in Sweden with top doctors from around the world giving lectures on the dangers and failures of the mRNA vaccines.
Doctors including Dr. Aseem Malhotra, Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. Pierre Kory, Dr. Jessica Rose, Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, Dr. Ryan Cole, Dr. Richard Urso and many more held fantastic speeches exposing the truth about the vaccines.
And the conference hall was completely packed with about 1000 people in attendance. It was a massive conference.
Guess what? It went completely ignored by the mainstream media. I know that they know the event was taking place. They deliberately ignored it. Thankfully many alternative media was there. (See link for article)
- Professor Arne Burkhardt showed slides of the spike proteins all over the body including the reproductive organs.
- Slides were shown with the spike protein in the prostate.
- A new study finds that ivermectin is a promising cancer drug – specifically in the prostate.
- The professor went so far as to advise women who want children to find an unvaccinated man.
- Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche stated that the unvaccinated will fare the best and are the best protected against COVID.
- While birthrates have plummeted, excess mortality is sky high.
- Dr. Jessica Rose showed that the lipid nanoparticles (SM-102) used in the Moderna shot is more dangerous to health than gasoline and diesel.
- While journalists from CNN, Reuters, AP and more were recently invited as special guests to the WEF where they mingled and met with political leaders and large corporations like Pfizer, they were conspicuously absent from the Stockholm conference.
- The author of the article got “fact checked” by Reuters on another article he wrote on data from Australia showing the more mRNA doses, the higher the risk of being hospitalized by COVID. The “fact checkers” didn’t even bother doing the math which proves the original article to be 100% correct. He points out the boss at Reuters also sits on the Pfizer board and that Reuters has an exclusive partnership with the WEF, with journalists invited to Davos as special guests. “It’s a big club and you ain’t in it!”
http:// Approx. 10 Min
Inside the Top Secret US Government Meeting to DENY Virus Natural Immunity
Feb. 10, 2023
Dr. Suneel Dhand
Based on this article: https://www.ntd.com/inside-the-secret-government-meeting-on-covid-19-natural-immunity
Secret Government Meeting on COVID-19 Natural Immunity (NTD): Opinions Not Aired Are Opinions Never Considered
What happens when you substitute politics for science, evidence-based medicine, and reality-based public health policy? This.
The panel of experts? According to EPOCH Times, our collective immunological fates and futures were entrusted to Collins, Fauci, Choucair, and Walensky – following input from only four people:
- Dr. Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and an adviser to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration on vaccines
- Dr. Michael Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota and a former member of Biden’s COVID-19 advisory board
- Akiko Iwasaki, professor of immunobiology and molecular, cellular, and developmental biology at Yale University
- Dr. Peter Hotez, co-director of Texas Children’s Hospital Center for Vaccine Development and dean of the Baylor College of Medicine’s School of Tropical Medicine
“No participants represented experts like Bhattacharya* who say that the naturally immune generally don’t need any doses at all.” – NTD
Many others also held that position, but we were censored by Big Tech.
Rational discourse requires hearing all positions on a matter and giving each position its due consideration. Debate, disagreement, and controversy are GOOD things in the search for truth – unless one particular political party decides to substitute politics for Science, evidence-based medicine, and reality-based public health policy.
On a matter such as respiratory viral illness, which we know (and Hotez knew) could involve specifically problems like antibody-dependent enhancement and pathogenic priming (which Hotez called “immune enhancement”), and issues that an immunologist like Iwasaki should have known (immune exhaustion, possibilities such as original antigenic sin and immune tolerance never even made it to the table.
Remember it was the day after Trump’s property was raided that CDC changed their views on natural immunity.
- Offit and one other “expert” stated that those with natural immunity need fewer “vaccine” doses. The other two “experts” argued natural immunity shouldn’t count for anything.
- These experts have received millions in grants from the NIH ~ showing a clear conflicts of interest.
- No experts who believe natural immunity is sufficient on its own were included in the meeting, despite the CDC’s admission that natural immunity was superior to vaccination against the Delta variant, which was displaced in late 2021 by Omicron. The CDC has made misleading representations on the evidence supporting vaccination of the naturally immune, and has not responded to a request for comment.
- Some research has shown that the naturally immune have a higher risk of side effects from the “vaccine” than those who haven’t recovered from infection. Some experts believe the risk is worth the benefit but others do not.
- Nothing was changed in the U.S. “vaccination” policy, which has never acknowledged post-infection protection.
- Fauci et al. continually downplay natural immunity claiming it is inferior to “vaccine” immunity, but most studies indicate the exact opposite.
- Some other countries offered benefits for those with natural immunity.
- Walensky, Murthy, and Collins did not respond to requests for interviews. Fauci, who stepped down from his positions in late 2022, could not be reached.
- The secret meeting, held in October 2021, was briefly discussed before on a podcast. The Epoch Times has independently confirmed the meeting took place, identified all of the participants, and uncovered other key details.
- Professor Dr. Jay Bhattacharya of Stanford states:
“It was a really impactful decision that they made in private with a very small number of people involved. And they reached the wrong decision.” ~ Dr. Bhattacharya