https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/03/who-should-wear-a-face-mask-30-march-who-briefing/

Should you wear a face mask? WHO officials weigh in at today’s COVID-19 briefing

responsive_large_1eZxi0KEzrDSGW8s39xTNZECn1VemR4DBs2RVNEyO_k

  • The World Health Organization held a media briefing to update the public on the COVID-19 outbreak. Streamed live Monday, 30 March.
  • WHO officials do not recommend mask wearing for healthy members of the general population.
  • Masks should be worn by those with the disease or those in close contact with those infected.
  • As lockdowns become more prevalent, family spread will become more common.

______________________

**Comment**

The CDC still states everyone should wear masks:  https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/cloth-face-cover.html, while the WHO says only caregivers and sick people should be wearing them:  https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/331693/WHO-2019-nCov-IPC_Masks-2020.3-  Excerpt:

There is currently no evidence that wearing a mask (whether medical or other types) by healthy persons in the wider community setting, including universal community masking, can prevent them from infection with respiratory viruses, including COVID-19.

President Trump has pulled the U.S. out of the WHO due to the fact it covered up the coronavirus outbreak for weeks:  https://trendingpolitics.com/breaking-trump-pulls-u-s-out-of-who-following-china-covid-19-scandal/

Confused yet?

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/23/masks-are-there-benefits-or-just-a-comfort-prop-let-the-facts-speak/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/27/cloth-masks-useless-against-covid-19/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/19/face-masks-pose-serious-risks-to-the-healthy-dr-blaylock/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/26/top-international-immunologist-trashes-cv-19-lockdown-masks/

 

 

 

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/that-summer-flu-might-be-lyme-disease-not-coronavirus-you-dont-want-that-either-2020-05-28

Opinion: That summer flu might be Lyme disease, not coronavirus — you don’t want that either

Delaying treatment can lead to severe, potentially debilitating symptoms

Are deer becoming even bolder this spring?

Summer is field season for ecologists like me, a time when my colleagues, students and I go out into fields and woods in search of ticks to study the patterns and processes that allow disease-causing microbes — primarily bacteria and viruses — to spread among wildlife and humans.

That field work means we’re also at risk of getting the very diseases we study. I always remind my crew members to pay close attention to their health. If they get a fever or any other signs of sickness, they should seek medical treatment immediately and tell their doctor that they may have been exposed to ticks.

When summer flu-like illnesses develop in anyone who spends time outdoors in areas where ticks are common, tick-transmitted diseases like Lyme disease should be considered a likely culprit.

This summer, however, the global emergence of the novel coronavirus and COVID-19 is presenting a whole new set of challenges for diagnosing Lyme disease and other tick-borne illnesses. (See link for article)

____________________

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2016/02/13/lyme-disease-treatment/

 

 

THE COVID-19 VACCINE:
Point of View from GLA Chairman Robert Kobre
COVID-19: IS A VACCINE THE ANSWER?

The United States is currently in a struggle between “opening up” to alleviate economic hardship and self-isolation to protect against infection from the current coronavirus. The nation can only return to pre-COVID-19 economic and social levels when the fear of death or grave illness is eliminated. As Chairman of the Global Lyme Alliance (GLA) I bring a unique perspective to this issue, as I have been deeply involved in our leading scientific research program for the last 10 years. The immune system is an extremely complex system that protects us from everyday exposure to harmful agents. Although new discoveries are constantly being made, one thing is clear that the public needs to understand, –the human immune system is not fully understood by scientists and doctors, and neither are most infectious agents. This incomplete knowledge of our immune system does not mean there is no hope, – it does mean that the general public must become well informed of this “knowledge gap” so there is no rush to judgment on any proposed solution to the current health crisis.

Thought leaders in industry, the media, and government constantly sing the same COVID-19 recovery song: “when there is a vaccine we can operate normally again.” The stock market is overreacting to morsels of embryonic vaccine research news. Dr. Anthony Fauci, head of infectious disease at NIH, has consistently referred to the development of a SARS-Cov-2 vaccine and its necessity before society can return to a ‘new’ normal. Friends, colleagues, and clients echo this all the time. The problem is that this proposition is short-sighted and focused on the wrong target. While a safe, effective vaccine is an important long-term objective, the primary focus must be effective treatments that can eradicate the virus, prevent it from infecting cells and also turn down the massive inflammatory “cytokine storm” triggered by the infection. Perhaps a genetic component in our immune system also plays a role in determining who cannot fight the disease. All angles should be intensely explored.

We should take comfort that scientific leaders and large pharmaceutical companies understand the need for speed and are focusing heavily on therapeutics while vaccine work continues in parallel. If Americans knew a simple trip to the pharmacy would stop their COVID-19 symptoms, fear would cease and the economy could safely reopen. If this were given prophylactically, it would also reduce the infection rate while a safe vaccine is finally developed. According to ClinicalTrials.govand the World Health Organization, there are at least 1,300 COVID-19 clinical trials underway worldwide, and importantly the number of trials focused on therapeutics (drugs) outnumber those searching for a vaccine by almost 10 to 1. Why, despite the rhetoric, should there be a greater focus on a drug to stop the symptoms of COVID-19 over a vaccine?

Drugs provide great flexibility, their side effects are typically reversible once a patient stops using them, and they are easily acceptable and accessible by the general population. Vaccines are an important arsenal in the fight against disease, yet vaccines carry risks because they tamper with an immune system we don’t fully understand. Further, vaccines are one dose fits all versus a drug whose dose and usage can vary depending upon the patient’s profile like age or their symptom severity. A vaccine’s side effects (other than fever) are typically harder to measure because they occur over long time periods.

Since a vaccine’s serious side effects tend to be autoimmune in nature, they are typically not reversible as opposed to an approved drug where the side effects tend to cease when the drug is stopped (excluding those taken during pregnancy). Lastly, not everyone will be quick to be vaccinated but would be more likely to take a drug for a period of time. The COVID-19 crisis provides an opportunity for the drug approval process to be reinvented in a creative way to expedite the process with reduced costs. Vaccines do not offer that luxury. A vaccine is critical to wiping out the disease, but it must not be rushed.

A case in point occurred in the late 1990s. A new Lyme disease vaccine was introduced which was developed by some of the top researchers in the world. The vaccine was widely distributed and for most people, it worked, but for some, it may have triggered the devastating symptoms of Lyme disease. Measuring the side effects of vaccines once launched is difficult as it requires patients or their doctors to realize that current symptoms are related to a vaccine taken many months before and have enough confidence in that causal effect to report the side effect voluntarily to the federal Vaccine Adverse Effect Reporting System (or “VAERS”). While some specialists today claim the side effects of the Lyme vaccine were overplayed, there was in fact a component of the vaccine that caused an auto-immune reaction consistent with Lyme disease. The vaccine was taken off the market three years after it was introduced.

At GLA, we have Ph.D.s on staff who work closely with top immunologists and microbiologists at the world’s leading research universities. What we know is important for the American public to understand – not only are researchers still learning how the immune system works, but scientists across the globe and GLA are also looking closely at the interplay between the immune system, nervous system, and the brain. Unfortunately, we are only in the 2nd inning of a 9-inning game. As such, the neurological and psychological side effects of any new SARS-Cov-2 vaccine must be included in the suite of side effects measured – in kids, teens, young adults, adults, and the elderly. A new vaccine must be carefully developed, tested, and all side effects measured over an extended period so the public can be fully informed of the risks.

So Lyme disease again provides a lens into which we can view the COVID-19 landscape. We learned that vaccines can have real downside risks if not developed correctly. We learned that in most cases they do not help those already ill. We learned that a safe vaccine is extremely important but in the short term drugs to stop the virus and its symptoms are critical. Let’s hope that the constant discussion in the media tying economic recovery to a vaccine does not lead to rushed vaccines that may unwittingly carry side effects that negatively impact more people than the vaccine saves. Global governmental leaders, media pundits, the financial markets, and captains of industry must get in sync with pharmaceutical firms and academic researchers who understand the quickest way to normalize life again is with effective drugs. We all want a vaccine that eliminates COVID-19 from the globe like was developed for polio and smallpox. In the meantime, as that vaccine is being developed, GLA has confidence that American and global researchers will come up with effective drug treatments as long as they are provided abundant resources, inducements to collaborate and encouragement to think outside the box. GLA has been fighting a rapidly growing, crippling disease for a long time, and our research program has developed more scientific breakthroughs than any other Lyme focused not-for-profit organization. We are uniquely qualified to bring what we have learned in the lab and our experiences to the COVID-19 problem in an effort to educate and bring relief to the nation and the world.

Read on GLA.org


Additional COVID-19 and Lyme Disease Resources
GLA POV: Parallel Pandemics: COVID-19 and Lyme Disease
Blog: Q&A on COVID-19 and Lyme Disease with LLMD
Blog: Personal Patient Experience with COVID-19 and Lyme Disease
Letter: GLA CEO Addresses COVID-19 and GLA Community
Letter: GLA Chairman Learning from Our Response to COVID-19

COVID-19 Treatments:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/06/02/successful-covid-19-critical-care-stonewalled-by-cdc/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/22/new-study-hcq-zinc-greatly-reduces-covid-19-health-risk/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/11/podcast-evidence-supporting-hcq-azithromycin-for-covid-19/

COVID-19 vaccine:  https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/another-gates-vaccine-bites-the-dust-sick-monkeys-everywhere/?

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/06/03/a-coronavirus-vaccine-patient-fainted-and-was-sicker-than-hed-ever-been-after-getting-moderna-injection/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/04/21/inovio-covid-19-vaccine-uses-electricity-to-drive-dna-into-body-cells/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/23/uk-vaccine-unable-to-prevent-monkeys-from-catching-covid-19/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/04/30/sound-choice-pharmaceutical-newsletter-covid-19-safety-concerns/

 

https://danielcameronmd.com/bells-palsy-can-lead-to-nonflaccid-facial-palsy/

BELL’S PALSY CAN LEAD TO NONFLACCID FACIAL PALSY

Bell’s palsy typically presents as flaccid facial palsy, where one or both sides of the face drops. However, Bell’s palsy can also lead to nonflaccid facial palsy. Lyme disease can cause either flaccid or nonflaccid facial palsy (NFFP).

There is a broad range of findings. “Nonflaccid facial paralysis is a spectrum of hypokinetic and hyperkinetic movement,” writes Markey and colleagues in the journal Otolaryngology.¹

Hypokinetic movement involves less movement, while hyperkinetic movement involves more movement.

“Clinically, this manifests as contraction of the orbicularis oris muscle simultaneous with eye closure or blinking and/or contraction of the orbicularis oculi during speaking or chewing,” explains Rubin in the Handbook of Clinical Neurology.² Orbicularis oris muscles are the group of muscles in the lips that encircles the mouth.

“Patients affected by NFFP often have a narrowed palpebral fissure, prominent and misoriented nasolabial fold, neck and face tightness, and mentalis dimpling,” writes Miller and colleagues in the journal Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine.³  “These muscles can make a smile asymmetry.”

Lyme disease can cause either flaccid or nonflaccid facial palsy. CLICK TO TWEET

A narrowed palpebral fissure is a narrowing of the eye opening between the eyelids. Mentalis are the chin muscles.

Bell’s palsy can lead to NFFP in 15–30% of patients, writes Miller. “Other common causes of NFFP include Ramsay Hunt syndrome, acoustic neuroma resection, Lyme disease, trauma, autoimmune disease.”

Patients can suffer from NFFP with significant functional, aesthetic, psychological, and social impairments,” writes Miller.

To view photos of patients with both flaccid and nonflaccid facial palsy, visit “The spectrum of facial palsy: The MEEI facial palsy photo and video standard set.”

Treatment of nonflaccid facial palsy

There is a wide range of treatments for NFFP including:

  • Physical therapy
  • Muscle relaxants
  • Facial massage
  • Acupuncture
  • Myectomy
  • Neurectomy
  • Botox

Editor’s note: I have treated Lyme disease patients in my practice with nonflaccid facial palsy and have seen first hand the “significant functional, aesthetic, psychological, and social impairments” it can cause, as described by Miller.

References:
  1. Markey JD, Loyo M. Latest advances in the management of facial synkinesis. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;25(4):265-272.
  2. Rubin D. Chapter 17 – Normal and abnormal spontaneous activity in the Handbook of Clinical Neurology. edited by Kerry H. Levin, Patrick Chauvel. Vol Volume 160, 2019, Pages 257-279: Science Direct; 2019.
  3. Miller MQ, Hadlock TA. Beyond Botox: Contemporary Management of Nonflaccid Facial Palsy. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2020;22(2):65-70.

_____________________

**Comment**

The most important treatment NOT mentioned is anti-microbial treatment for Lyme disease.

In my experience, symptoms go away or lessen considerably with antimicrobial treatment.  From personal experience I can tell you I would have wasted a lot of money and time had I tried to treat each symptom with adjunctive therapies.  Of course if the symptom is debilitating it would probably be worth it, but many symptoms come and go throughout treatment, but good, effective antimicrobial treatment has always been and will always be where you should spend your money first.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/new-research-study-clarifies-health-outcomes-in-vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated-children/?

New Research Study Clarifies Health Outcomes in Vaccinated versus Unvaccinated Children

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE – May 28, 2020

Contact:

Brian Hooker, Ph.D.
Children’s Health Defense
(509) 366-2269

Unvaccinated children are less likely to be diagnosed with developmental delays, asthma, and ear infections.

Redding CA— A new peer-reviewed study in the journal SAGE Open Medicine details the health outcomes of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children from three pediatric practices in the United States concludes that unvaccinated children have better health outcomes than their vaccinated peers.

Children in the study were followed continuously for a minimum of 3 years from birth.  The study was based on medical records of over 2000 children enrolled in three pediatric practices and born between November 2005 and June 2015.  Vaccination status was determined based on any vaccination received prior to one year of age which yielded 30.9% of the children in the unvaccinated group. Results show that vaccination before one year of age led to significantly increased odds of medical diagnoses of developmental delays, asthma and ear infections in children.

In a separate analysis, based on the number of vaccines received by one year of age, children receiving more vaccines were more likely to be diagnosed with gastrointestinal disorders compared to those who received no vaccines within the same timeframe.  In temporal analyses, children vaccinated prior to six months of age showed significant risks of each of the disorders studied as compared to unvaccinated children in the same timeframe.

The study, coauthored by Dr. Brian Hooker and Mr. Neil Miller, is unique in that all diagnoses were verified using abstracted medical records from each of the participating pediatric practices.  Lead author of the study, Dr. Hooker, stated,

“The results definitely indicate better health outcomes in children who did not receive vaccines within their first year of life.  These findings are consistent with additional research that has identified vaccination as a risk factor for a variety of adverse health outcomes.  Such findings merit additional large-scale study of vaccinated and unvaccinated children in order to provide optimal health as well as protection against infectious diseases.”

Children’s Health Defense (CHD) has assembled nearly 60 studies that find vaccinated cohorts to be far sicker than their unvaccinated peers. CHD is a non-profit organization dedicated to ending the recent epidemic of chronic health conditions affecting 54% of children. The organization recognizes a variety of harmful environmental exposures contributing to an overall decline in children’s health.

View/Download PDF

© [May 28, 2020] Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

______________________

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/05/18/first-peer-reviewed-study-of-vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated-children/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/08/05/fully-vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated-a-summary-of-the-research/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/10/08/vaccine-safety-efficacy-studies-that-are-the-bases-for-marketing-authorizations-are-a-complete-methodological-mess/

https://www.worldhealth.net/news/rfk-jr-wins-case-against-government-vaccine-safety-violations/  RFK Jr. Wins Case Against Government For Vaccine Safety Violations