Fauci States COVID Test Has a Fatal Flaw Back in July, Just Like He Said Face-Masks Were Useless Back in May

November 12, 2020

https://humansarefree.com/2020/11/bombshell-fauci-states-covid-test-has-fatal-flaw

Important excerpts from article below:

Bombshell: Fauci States COVID Test Has Fatal Flaw

By Jon Rappoport, Guest writer 

November 7, 2020

Bombshell Fauci States Covid Test Has Fatal FlawJuly 16, 2020, podcast, “This Week in Virology”

Tony Fauci makes a point of saying the PCR COVID test is useless and misleading when the test is run at “35 cycles or higher.” A positive result, indicating infection, cannot be accepted or believed.

Here, in techno-speak, is an excerpt from Fauci’s key quote (starting at about the 4-minute mark [1]):

“…If you get [perform the test at] a cycle threshold of 35 or more… the chances of it being replication-confident [aka accurate] are miniscule… you almost never can culture virus [detect a true positive result] from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36…”

What Fauci failed to say on the video is: the FDA, which authorizes the test for public use, recommends the test should be run up to 40 cycles. Not 35.

Therefore, all labs in the US that follow the FDA guideline are knowingly or unknowingly participating in fraud. Fraud on a monstrous level, because millions of Americans are being told they are infected with the virus on the basis of a false positive result, and the total number of COVID cases in America — which is based on the test — is a gross falsity. (See link for article)

Go here for video & references:   [1] Fauci on YouTube.com; [2] FDA.gov; [3] NYtimes.com)

______________________

**Comment**

I posted on this back in September:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/09/30/coronavirus-cases-plummet-when-pcr-tests-are-adjusted/

The entire COVID-19 house of cards is built upon this faulty testing which is designed to drastically inflate case numbers.

Rapport’s evidence is found on the FDA website: in a document titled [2]: “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel For Emergency Use Only.” See page 35.

  • FDA: “…a specimen is considered positive for 2019-nCoV [virus] if all 2019-nCoV marker (N1, N2) cycle threshold growth curves cross the threshold line within 40.00 cycles (< 40.00 Ct).”
  • He also lists a New York Times article (August 29/updated September 17) headlined: “Your coronavirus test is positive. Maybe it shouldn’t be.” [3]
  • “Most tests set the limit at 40 [cycles]. A few at 37.”
  • The Times:“This number of amplification cycles needed to find the virus, called the cycle threshold, is never included in the results sent to doctors and coronavirus patients…”
The labs purposely won’t reveal their collusion.

Rapport states this should be taken to court. I agree.

Regarding facemasks, Dr. Fauci stated back in May that masks might make people ‘feel better’ but that they often create unintended consequences. He also states they don’t provide perfect protection.

http://

Of course he reversed this some time later because the fear narrative had to be pushed. The fact the largest study on face masks has been rejected by 3 journals tells you of the major spin doctoring going on:

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/11/06/danish-newspaper-reveals-largest-study-on-masks-has-been-rejected-by-3-medical-journals/

Also see:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/11/03/is-it-time-for-full-time-mask-mandates/  All the research listed here

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/08/13/best-video-on-masks-yet-new-health-problems-emerging-from-continuous-mask-wearing-but-attempted-murder-charges-sought-for-those-who-refuse-them/

But lying is something Dr. Fauci does well, and he’s been getting away with it for decades:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/10/30/anthony-fauci-40-years-of-lies-from-azt-to-remdesivir/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/12/shedding-light-on-the-dishonorable-record-of-dr-fauci-a-real-mengele/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/04/24/the-truth-about-fauci-featuring-dr-judy-mikovits/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/08/31/7-minutes-of-covid-19-truth/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/08/24/the-rush-to-patent-control-profit-from-the-coronavirus-dates-back-to-1999-implicates-the-cdc-dr-fauci/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/09/19/yes-fauci-and-gates-do-have-ties-to-covid-19-vaccine-maker/

Category:

Testing, Viruses

Comments Off on Fauci States COVID Test Has a Fatal Flaw Back in July, Just Like He Said Face-Masks Were Useless Back in May

A Flea’s Knees: A Unique Presentation of Cat Scratch Disease

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33129648/

The flea’s knees: A unique presentation of cat scratch disease

. 2020 Oct 24;S0735-6757(20)30929-3.

doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.10.033. Online ahead of print.

Jacob M Begres 1, Courtney W Mangus 2

Abstract

A 4-year-old girl presented to the emergency department with right leg pain and associated limp for one day. There was no trauma or injury; she had no fever or recent illness. Her exam was notable for tenderness and swelling to the right knee, most prominent in the popliteal region. Initial laboratory testing was unremarkable except for a mildly elevated C-reactive protein. She had normal radiographs of the right lower extremity. A soft tissue ultrasound demonstrated popliteal lymphadenopathy, a rare finding in children. Reassessment of the patient revealed cat flea bites to the leg, which prompted concern for Bartonella henselae infection causing Cat-scratch Disease (CSD). The patient was treated empirically with Azithromycin and her Bartonella titers returned two days later consistent with active infection. This is a rare clinical report describing popliteal lymphadenitis and lower extremity arthropathy caused by Bartonella henselae infection secondary to cat flea bites.

___________________

**Comment**

I can only fathom the thousands of similar cases that have gone undiagnosed.

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2016/01/03/bartonella-treatment/

Category:

Bartonella, research, Treatment

Comments Off on A Flea’s Knees: A Unique Presentation of Cat Scratch Disease

U.S. Right to Know Sues NIH For Documents About Origins of SARS-CoV-2

https://usrtk.org/news-releases/u-s-right-to-know-sues-nih-for-documents-about-origins-of-sars-cov-2/

U.S. Right to Know Sues NIH for Documents about Origins of SARS-CoV-2

Posted on by Gary Ruskin

News Release

For Immediate Release: Thursday, November 5, 2020
For More Information Contact: Gary Ruskin (415) 944-7350 or Sainath Suryanarayanan

U.S. Right to Know, an investigative public health nonprofit group, filed a lawsuit today against the National Institutes of Health (NIH) for violating provisions of the Freedom of Information Act.

The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., seeks correspondence with or about organizations such as the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the Wuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, as well as the EcoHealth Alliance, which partnered with and funded the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Today’s litigation against the NIH is one part of our efforts to try to uncover what is known about the origins of SARS-CoV-2, and the risks of biosafety labs and gain-of-function research, which seeks to augment the infectivity or lethality of potential pandemic pathogens. Since July, we have filed 36 state, federal and international public records requests about these subjects.

“Preventing the next pandemic may depend crucially on understanding the origins of the present one,” said Gary Ruskin, executive director of U.S. Right to Know. “We want to know whether the US or Chinese governments, or scientists affiliated with them, are concealing data about the origins of SARS-CoV-2, or the risks of biosafety labs and gain-of-function research.”

NIH denied our FOIA request and determined to “withhold those records pursuant to Exemption 7(A), 5 U.S.C. § 552, and section 5.31 (g)(l) of the HHS FOIA Regulations, 45 CFR Part 5. Exemption 7(A) permits the withholding of investigatory records compiled for law enforcement purposes when disclosure could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings.”

For more information about our investigation, see our post on “Why we are researching the origins of SARS-CoV-2, biosafety labs and GOF research” and our reading list on “What are the origins of SARS-CoV-2? What are the risks of gain-of-function research?”

U.S. Right to Know is an investigative research group focused on promoting transparency for public health. For more information, see our website at usrtk.org.

___________________

**Comment**

Back in August, Andrew Johnson of the UK requested documents showing SARS-COV2 has been isolated and causes COVID-19. He was told: “Public Health England (PHE) does not hold the information you have specified.”  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/10/09/foi-asking-uk-officials-for-proof-of-isolation-of-sars-cov-2-virus-they-cant-give-it/

Which brings us full circle to the article by David Crowe:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/03/16/does-the-coronavirus-exist/

This house of cards has also been pointed out by Crowe, Torsten, and Engelbrecht decades ago for all the other virus ‘pandemics’ that supposedly occurred: https://www.torstenengelbrecht.com/en/virus-mania/

Conflicts of interest:  

Please contact your representatives.  We needed answers to this months ago, but better late than never because trust me, they won’t stop creating more lucrative ‘pandemics’:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/10/22/contact-your-senators-representatives-to-demand-a-congressional-investigation-on-the-origins-of-covid-19/

And if you haven’t done it already, please consider signing this petition:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/30/say-no-to-forced-covid-19-vaccination-sign-petition/

And add your organization to this list for health freedom:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/09/14/community-and-world-united-we-say-no/

Category:

Activism, Viruses

Comments Off on U.S. Right to Know Sues NIH For Documents About Origins of SARS-CoV-2

Children Not Likely to Facilitate COVID-19 (Only 1% of Asymptomatic Children Test Positive)

November 11, 2020

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2770117

Research Letter
September 14, 2020

Frequency of Children vs Adults Carrying Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Asymptomatically

Gregorio P. Milani, MD; Ilaria Bottino, MD2; Alessia Rocchi, MD1; et alPaola Marchisio, MD3; Silvia Elli, MD2; Carlo Agostoni, MD4; Giorgio Costantino, MD5
Author Affiliations Article Information
JAMA Pediatr. Published online September 14, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.3595
COVID-19 Resource Center
 

Children have been suggested as the facilitators of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission and amplification,1 because many affected children might be asymptomatic.2,3 Accordingly, social and public health policies, such as school closure, have been implemented in many countries. However, the role of children in asymptomatically carrying SARS-CoV-2 needs to be further explored. In this study, we investigated the frequency of individuals carrying SARS-CoV-2 among children admitted for noninfectious conditions and without any SARS-CoV-2–associated symptoms or signs and compare it with the frequency of individuals carrying SARS-CoV-2 among a similar adult population.

Methods

At the Fondazione Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico in Milan, Italy, all patients who require hospitalization after accessing either the pediatric emergency department (for participants younger than 18 years) or the adult emergency department (for individuals 18 years and older) immediately undergo a nasopharyngeal swab for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, regardless of their symptoms. If the first sample has negative results, a second one is administered within 12 to 48 hours. For this study, eligible patients were those admitted for noninfectious conditions to this hospital from March 1 to April 30, 2020. We excluded individuals presenting with any signs or symptoms possibly associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection and those with a history of close and prolonged contact with individuals who had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 or had a history of symptoms or signs consistent with COVID-19 in the previous 21 days. Individuals with only 1 nasopharyngeal swab available were also excluded. The Milano Area 2 ethics committee approved the study, which included a waiver of informed consent because of the retrospective nature of the investigation.

Data on age, sex, the reason for admission, and development of any SARS-CoV-2 signs of infection in the following 48 hours were retrospectively collected. A comparison of proportions between the pediatric and adult cohorts was made with the 2-tailed Fisher test. An odds ratio and its 95% CIs were calculated as a measure of risk of carrying SARS-CoV-2. Significance was assumed when P < .05. Statistical analysis was performed using the open-source statistical language R, version 3.5.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing).

Results

In the study period, 881 children presented to the pediatric emergency department, and 83 children (34 girls and 49 boys; median [interquartile range] age, 5.3 [1.1-11.0] years) fulfilled the eligibility criteria. In the same period, among the 3610 adults presenting to the adult emergency department, 131 (51 women and 80 men; median [interquartile range] age, 77 [57-84] years) were included. The reasons for admission of the included individuals are given in the Table. Children were found to be less frequently positive than adults (1 in 83 children [1.2%] vs 12 in 131 adults [9.2%]; P = .02), with an odds ratio of 0.12 (95% CI, 0.02-0.95) compared with adults. Eleven of 12 adults were positive for SARS-CoV-2 at the first swab. None of the included individuals developed signs or symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the 48 hours after the admission.

Table.  Characteristics of the Included Children and Adults (N = 214)
View LargeDownload
Characteristics of the Included Children and Adults (N = 214)
 
Discussion

In this study conducted among individuals hospitalized in Milan, one of the cities with the highest SARS-CoV-2 burden in the world, about 1% of children and 9% of adults without any symptoms or signs of SARS-CoV-2 infection tested positive for the virus. It has been estimated that approximately 80% of adults with SARS-CoV-2 are asymptomatic.4 The few available reports5on children are from China and suggest that children who are asymptomatic might be 15% of individuals positive for SARS-CoV-2. In this study, children without symptoms and signs of SARS-CoV-2 carried the virus less frequently than adults, suggesting that their role as facilitators of the spreading of SARS-CoV-2 infection could be reconsidered. Along with this potential important implication, some limitations should be acknowledged: first, we retrospectively analyzed only cases requiring hospitalization, and second, we report a single-center experience. However, these preliminary results can help understanding the epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 infections. Particularly, these data do not support the hypothesis that children are at higher risk of carrying SARS-CoV-2 asymptomatically than adults.

Accepted for Publication: May 26, 2020.

Corresponding Author: Carlo Agostoni, MD, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via della Commenda 9, 20122 Milan, Italy (carlo.agostoni@unimi.it).

Published Online: September 14, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.3595

Author Contributions: Drs Agostoni and Costantino had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the analysis.

Concept and design: Milani, Rocchi, Agostoni, Costantino.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.

Drafting of the manuscript: Milani, Costantino.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Bottino, Rocchi, Marchisio, Elli, Agostoni.

Statistical analysis: Milani.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Bottino, Rocchi, Elli.

Supervision: Marchisio, Agostoni, Costantino.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

___________________

**Comment**

Despite this, schools and extra curricular activities have been shut-down for children.  We’ve been told repeatedly children are silent but deadly.

I pray things change soon.  We are raising a generation of germaphobes who have been taught to fear everything, but the truth is we live in a microbiome which includes germs and viruses, many of them beneficial.  The key is to keep things in balance by supporting your immune system and eliminating toxins.  Our public ‘authorities’ have purposely shifted all the attention to a virus rather than educating the public on better health practices and very real issues like the health effects of 5G, GMO food, poisonous pesticides/herbicides, and eliminating other environmental toxins in the environment and health care products.

The power lies in our own hands.  

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/11/06/nine-covid-facts-a-pandemic-of-fearmongering-ignorance/

 

Category:

Activism, research, Viruses

Comments Off on Children Not Likely to Facilitate COVID-19 (Only 1% of Asymptomatic Children Test Positive)

Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases of Colorado, Including New State Records for Areas Radiatus & Ixodes Brunneus

https://academic.oup.com/jme/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jme/tjaa232/5961600?guestAccessKey=0b81625f-4e0a-4a09-aed2-2305b5f035e4

Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases of Colorado, Including New State Records for Argas radiatus (Ixodida: Argasidae) and Ixodes brunneus (Ixodida: Ixodidae)

H Joel Hutcheson,  James W Mertins,  Boris C Kondratieff,  Monica M White Journal of Medical Entomology, tjaa232, https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjaa232Published: 09 November 2020 Article history

Abstract

We report 28 species of ticks (Acari: Ixodida) from Colorado (CO).

We include the soft ticks (Argasidae):

Argas (Argas) cooleyi Kohls and Hoogstraal, Argas (Persicargas) radiatus Railliet, Carios (Alectorobius) concanensis (Cooley and Kohls), Carios (Alectorobius) kelleyi (Cooley and Kohls), Ornithodoros(Pavlovskyella) hermsi Wheeler et al., Ornithodoros (Pavlovskyella) parkeri Cooley, Ornithodoros (Pavlovskyella) turicata (Dugès), Otobius (Otobius) lagophilus Cooley and Kohls, and Otobius (Otobius) megnini (Dugès).

We include the metastriate hard ticks (Ixodidae) Dermacentor (Americentor) albipictus (Packard), Dermacentor (Dermacentor) andersoni Stiles, Dermacentor (Dermacentor) parumapertus Neumann, Dermacentor (Dermacentor) variabilis (Say), Haemaphysalis (Aboimisalis) chordeilis (Packard), Haemaphysalis (Gonixodes) leporispalustris (Packard), and Rhipicephalus (Rhipicephalus) sanguineus Latreille.

Prostriate hard ticks include Ixodes (Ixodiopsis) angustus Neumann, Ixodes (Phoeloioxdes) baergi Cooley and Kohls, Ixodes (Trichotoixodes) brunneus Koch, Ixodes (Scaphixodes) howelli Cooley and Kohls, Ixodes (Phoeloioxdes) kingiBishopp, Ixodes (Phoeloioxdes) marmotae Cooley and Kohls, Ixodes (Ixodiopsis) ochotonae Gregson, Ixodes (Phoeloioxdes) sculptus Neumann, Ixodes (Ixodiopsis) soricis Gregson, Ixodes (Ixodes) spinipalpis Hadwen and Nuttall, Ixodes(Phoeloioxdes) texanus Banks, and Ixodes (Ixodiopsis) woodi Bishopp. Argas radiatus and Ixodes brunneus represent new state records.

Review of collection reports revealed that inclusion of Ixodes (Multidentatus) auritulus (Neumann), Ixodes (Phoeloioxdes) cookei Packard, Ixodes (Phoeloioxdes) marxi Banks, and Ixodes (Ixodes) pacificus Cooley and Kohls is dubious or unconfirmed and, conversely, that C. concanensis and H. chordeilis have distributions that include CO.

We list an additional five species occasionally detected and 13 exotic species intercepted in CO.

Tick-host associations, geographical distributions, and medical/veterinary importance are included.

Category:

research, Ticks

Comments Off on Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases of Colorado, Including New State Records for Areas Radiatus & Ixodes Brunneus