https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/06/09/faucis-emails.aspx?

Fauci in the Hot Seat as Emails Reveal His Lies

Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola Fact Checked

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • Dr. Anthony Fauci — whose expertise has been held as indisputable by mainstream media since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic — is now facing mounting scrutiny and critique as correspondence obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request reveals he’s lied both to the public and the U.S. Senate on a number of issues
  • Emails show Fauci supported the kind of dangerous research that likely created the COVID-19 pandemic, and that he helped cover up the lab origin theory
  • Fauci, until very recently, exclusively promoted the natural origin theory. We now find he assisted in the creation of a paper in Nature Medicine that came to underpin the entire natural origin theory, all while being informed of the fact that there were indications the virus had engineered features
  • The FOIA documents also show Fauci has lied about masks being an effective form of protection
  • Fauci has also failed to acknowledge that natural immunity is acquired when you recover from COVID-19, which makes vaccination completely unnecessary, and has yet to oppose recommendations to vaccinate recovered COVID-19 patients even though they’re immune and appear to be more prone to vaccine damage

Saint Anthony’s halo is tarnishing and hanging more crooked by the day. Dr. Anthony Fauci — whose medical expertise has been held as indisputable by mainstream media since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic — is now facing mounting scrutiny and critique as correspondence obtained through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request by Buzzfeed reveals he’s lied both to the public and the U.S. Senate on a number of issues.

The emails were released to the public in the early-morning hours of June 2, 2021. All 3,234 pages of emails can be found on Document Cloud.1 News media pounced on the release, with each reporter offering their own spin on what the fallout of the emails might be.

https://video.foxnews.com/v/embed.js?id=6257693457001&w=466&h=263<noscript>Watch the latest video at <a href=”https://www.foxnews.com”>foxnews.com</a></noscript>”>http://https://video.foxnews.com/v/embed.js?id=6257693457001&w=466&h=263

Important Video Here (Approx. 10 Min):

“The Next Revolution” by Steve Hilton
In the video above,2 “The Next Revolution” host Steve Hilton details how Fauci and National Institute of Health director Dr. Francis Collins have both repeatedly lied about the origins of SARS-CoV-2.

‘Utter Fraudulence’

In a no-holds-barred monologue Wednesday, June 2, 2021, Fox News host Tucker Carlson (above) called for a criminal investigation of Fauci in the aftermath of the release of thousands of emails, exchanged in the early days of the pandemic between Fauci and numerous individuals, including Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg and billionaire Bill Gates.

Carlson blasted Fauci for what he said was “utter fraudulence” that should put Fauci under criminal investigation. After previously hosting him on many Fox newscasts, including Carlson’s own, the emails show Fauci is “just another sleazy federal bureaucrat — deeply political and often dishonest,” Carlson said.

What’s worse, the emails implicate Fauci “in the very pandemic he’d been charged with fighting.” While Fauci has denied funding gain-of-function research, emails now reveal he did indeed support “the grotesque and dangerous experiments that appeared to have made COVID possible,” Carlson said, adding that the emails are so damning that “in retrospect it looks a lot like perjury.”

Sen. Rand Paul apparently agrees. In a recent Fox News interview (below), Paul said the released emails reveal a “disturbing picture” that “should preclude [Fauci] from the position that he’s in.”

Fauci Lied About Not Funding Gain-of-Function Research

Some of the emails show Fauci, early in 2020, was concerned that Americans might think the virus came from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in China. Why would he be concerned about that? As noted by Carlson, this makes perfect sense if he knew he had funded the very research that now looked like the source of the pandemic.

January 31, 2020, Kristian Andersen, a virologist at the Scripps Research Institute in California, emailed Fauci stating that “The unusual features of the virus make up a really small part of the genome (<0.1%) so one has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features (potentially) look engineered.”

He later wrote that he and his team “all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory.” Interestingly, some six weeks later, Andersen published a paper in which he and his team insisted the virus could not have been created in a lab. I’ll have more to say on this later, as the email cache also reveals Fauci had a hand in the creation of that paper. On a side note, four days after the release of the emails, Andersen deleted his entire Twitter account.3

The next day, Fauci sent an urgent email to Dr. Hugh Auchincloss, the principal deputy director of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), titled “IMPORTANT.” “It is essential that we speak this AM,” Fauci wrote. “Keep your cell phone on … Read this paper as well as the e-mail that I will forward to you now. You will have tasks today that must be done.”

Attached to the email was a file titled “Baric, Shi et al – Nature medicine – SARS Gain of function.pdf.” This paper was written by Ralph Baric, Ph.D., a virologist in the U.S., and Shi Zhengli, a researcher at the WIV who specializes in bat coronaviruses.

May 11, 2021, Fauci testified before the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee.4 During an exchange with Sen. Rand Paul, Fauci insisted that “the NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.” He also insisted that Baric does not engage in gain-of-function research. This is the same Baric whose paper Fauci sent to Auchincloss, clearly marked as “SARS gain-of-function.”

As reviewed in “The Biggest Flip-Flop Ever — Who’s Going to Jail?” the kind of research Fauci funded has long been referred to as gain-of-function, yet now he’s trying to redefine what’s covered by that term.

As noted by Carlson in his June 2, 2021, report, social media platforms aggressively censored and deplatformed people for the “crime” of talking about the possibility of SARS-CoV-2 being a lab creation that got loose, and they did so largely based on the word of Fauci himself. Fauci said it wasn’t so, and that became the gospel repeated by fact checkers everywhere.

Now all of a sudden, there appears to have been a coordinated U-turn. The question is, why did they lie to us for so long? In the video report above, Carlson reveals part of the answer: Scientists were afraid to lose their funding, funding which, by the way, comes from the American taxpayers.

Fauci Lied About the Origin of the Virus

In an April 17, 2020, White House press briefing, Fauci lied again, when he said the science was “totally consistent with a jump from an animal to a human.” Yet “what he asserted as conclusively known could not have been known,” Carlson points out.

Two days after this press briefing, EcoHealth Alliance president Peter Daszak, Ph.D., wrote to Fauci thanking him for his help in deflecting the lab origin theory. The email reads:

“As the PI of the R01 grant publicly targeted by Fox News reporters at the Presidential press briefing last night, I just wanted to say a personal thankyou on behalf of our staff and collaborators, for publicly standing up and stating that the scientific evidence supports a natural origin for COVID-19 from a bat-to-human spillover, not a lab release from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.”

Who is Daszak? He’s none other than the middle-man between Fauci’s NIAID/NIH and the WIV. EcoHealth Alliance received several NIH grants for millions of dollars involving gain-of-function research on coronaviruses, which were then farmed out to Zhengli and others at the WIV. So, Daszak certainly had cause to want to deflect attention from the lab leak theory.

He was also well aware of how risky this research was. In 2015, he spoke at a National Academies of Science seminar on reducing risk from emerging infectious diseases, warning of the danger of experimenting on “humanized mice,”5 meaning lab mice that have been genetically altered to carry human genes, cells or tissues.

That same year, Daszak also published a paper in which he warned a global pandemic might occur from a laboratory incident and that “the risks were greater with the sort of virus manipulation research being carried out in Wuhan.”6

January 2, 2020, he sent out a tweet announcing he’d successfully isolated SARS coronaviruses “that bind to human cells in the lab,” and that the work of other scientists show some of these viruses have pandemic potential as they can infect humanized mice.7

Yet, from the get-go, Daszak did everything he could to dispel discussion about SARS-CoV-2 being anything but all-natural. He went on record dismissing the lab-origin theory as “pure baloney.”8,9

He was also the mastermind behind the publication of a scientific statement published in The Lancet10 condemning such inquiries as “conspiracy theory,”11,12 which was then relied on by the media to “debunk” theories and evidence showing the pandemic virus most likely originated from a laboratory.

To further ensure the lab-leak theory would die out, Daszak was chosen to be on two separate commissions charged with investigating the origin of SARS-CoV-2, one by the World Health Organization13 — which, of course, dismissed the lab theory out of hand — and one by The Lancet.14

‘Hidden Hand’ Behind Natural Origin Theory Revealed

Now, finally, all these efforts to obfuscate the truth are falling apart. Fauci’s role in the obfuscation is also becoming much clearer. In the documentary “Plandemic — Indoctornation,” Dr. Meryl Nass stated there had to have been “a hidden hand behind the Nature Medicine paper”15 that became the basis for the natural, zoonotic origin theory.

This paper is not to be confused with the other Nature Medicine paper cited earlier, published by Baric and Shi. The paper Nass is referring to was created by Scripps researcher Kristian Andersen who, in January 2020, told Fauci that some of the features of the genomic sequence “(potentially) look engineered.”

Andersen’s paper “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2”16 — published March 17, 2020, and co-written by Andrew Rambaut, Ian Lipkin, Edward Holmes and Robert Garry — became the preeminent “proof” that SARS-CoV-2 had a natural origin and couldn’t possibly come from a lab.

“Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus,” the paper states.17 The email cache now identifies who comprised the “hidden hand” behind this paper. They were none other than Fauci himself, NIH director Collins and Jeremy Farrar, head of the Wellcome Trust.

In the email on page 2,401, dated March 6, 2020, Andersen thanks Fauci, Collins and Farrar for their “advice and leadership” on the paper. His four co-authors are cc’d, along with the Salk Institute’s communications director, Chris Emery.

fauci email

Fauci, Collins and Farrar — A Tag-Team of Coverup Artists

This is huge. “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2”18 was the scientific underpinning of the natural origin claim, and now we find out Fauci himself was involved in its creation. Farrar and Collins are also neck-deep in this cover-up.

Farrar cosigned the scientific statement in The Lancet,19 which turned out to have been orchestrated by Daszak, as mentioned earlier. Farrar was also involved in the WHO Solidarity Trial,20 which poisoned patients with toxic doses of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). In this trial, which was clearly designed to prove HCQ was “dangerous,” they used a cumulative dose of 8,800 mg over 10 days.

Meanwhile, doctors across the world who reported success with the drug were using standard doses around 200 mg per day for just a few days. Farrar, having spent 18 years leading a clinical research unit in Vietnam,21 would have (or should have) been aware that such high doses of HCQ — a widely used anti-malaria medication — would be toxic.

As for Collins, he promoted the cover-up by publishing a March 26, 2020, blog post22 in which he said Andersen’s Nature Medicine paper proved a natural origin, and to ignore rumors to the contrary. What’s more, after Fauci unconvincingly tried to claim that the NIAID/NIH has never funded any gain-of-function research, Collins came to his rescue with a public NIH statement23in which he backed Fauci’s claim.

Bombshell Emails on What Fauci Knew

In a June 3, 2021, report, Carlson reviewed Fauci’s “surreal” media appearances following the release of the emails. As just one example, he simply laughed off the question of why so much of a particular email between him and Collins was redacted.

In the unredacted part, Collins warns Fauci that a “conspiracy theory” about the virus’ origin is gaining speed. Why, exactly, was this email redacted? What did the remainder of the email say? Fauci claims ignorance on the matter, and the mainstream media are letting him off the hook.

Now, when a document is redacted, a classification is assigned, explaining why parts must remain secret, and in this case, those classifications are interesting indeed. Redacted emails between Fauci and nongovernment individuals such as Zuckerberg and Daszak bear codes such as:24,25

  • (b)(4), which refers to information that would impair the application of state-of-the-art technology within a U.S. weapon system
  • (b)(6), which refers to information, including foreign government information, that would cause serious harm to relations between the U.S. and a foreign government, or to ongoing diplomatic activities of the U.S.
  • (b)(7), which refers to information that would impair the current ability of U.S. government officials to protect the president, vice president and other protectees for whom protection services, in the interest of national security, are authorized

Fauci Lied About Masks

The email cache also shows Fauci lied about other things, including masks and vaccines. In one email, Fauci explained that surgical masks don’t work against viruses because the viruses slip right through the material, which is the truth. But when it comes to his public statements about masks, Fauci has been a serial liar.

He started off saying Americans shouldn’t wear them because they offer little to no protection — which is true — and the benefits are mostly psychological, as it might make you feel safer. Then he changed his mind, urging everyone to wear a mask all the time. When confronted about this U-turn, he said he lied about masks not being effective because he wanted to make sure there would be enough for frontline workers.

Well, in reality, he lied about lying, because he told the truth that first time. Everything since then, however, has been one fib after another. One mask wasn’t even sufficient. Fauci started recommending two. Then he insisted people had to keep wearing them even after they get vaccinated. There’s no scientific rationale for this at all, and Fauci knows it.

Fauci Still Has Not Told the Truth About Natural Immunity

Fauci has also been dishonest about the need for COVID-19 vaccination. In early March 2020, a former Obama official emailed Fauci asking if people who recover from COVID-19 can expect to be immune thereafter. Fauci replied, “No evidence in this regard, but you would assume that their [sic] would be substantial immunity post infection.”

Here, it’s fairly safe to make assumptions because it’s a well-established medical fact that when you recover from a viral infection, you are immune, and that immunity can be lifelong in many cases. It would be quite unusual if immunity were not incurred after recovering from a viral infection. As noted by Carlson, that robust immunity occurs post-COVID-19 has also been confirmed in studies over the past year.

Now, if you have natural immunity against an illness, you do not need to be vaccinated. Period. Yet to this day, Fauci has never admitted this publicly, and he has not publicly opposed recommendations to vaccinate those who have recovered from COVID-19, even though there’s evidence to suggest such individuals are at higher risk of vaccine injury. Not even those who can prove they have antibodies are excluded from the vaccine push.

Fauci Tried to Derail Florida

Other emails from March 2020, discussed in The Beltway Report,26 show Fauci also promised to put pressure on Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis to close down gyms, bars and beaches.

The recipient of this email exchange was a Florida HIV specialist named Doug Brust, who wrote, “I’m the HIV doc here. I’m it … I am putting my life on the line so folks can go pump iron, drink beer, have a burger, and get a tan.” In response, Fauci wrote, in part:27

“Regarding the bars and beaches, I have been screaming on TV 2 to 5 times per night to tell the younger generation to start taking this seriously … I am very surprised that Gov. DeSantis has not completely closed the bars, even if they serve food. Take out only. I will bring this up at the Task Force meeting tomorrow.”

Fauci’s Book Release Scrubbed Amid Backlash

fauci book

In light of Fauci’s rapidly waning star power, his book, “Expect the Unexpected: Ten Lessons on Truth, Service, and the Way Forward,” slated for release in November 2021, has now been scrubbed from Amazon and Barnes & Noble. We found an archived copy of the original Amazon listing, but even the cached version disappeared within a week. If you search for the book on either of these book vendors now, you won’t find it. As reported by Just the News June 2, 2021:28

“The scrubbing of the book comes after backlash from critics who accused Fauci of profiting off of the deadly pandemic the U.S. response to which he has overseen.

Among those criticizing Fauci is Fox News Channel contributor Joe Concha, who compared him to New York Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo signing a seven-figure book deal about his efforts during the pandemic, which resulted in a high number of death among assisted-living residents.

‘If you look at the numbers again, you had Cuomo profiting off a pandemic, a government official,’ said Concha, also a media reporter for The Hill newspaper. ‘Now we have Fauci doing it as well. I think this is appalling.’

Daily Caller writer Greg Price slammed Fauci for ‘publishing a book and [becoming] the highest paid federal government employee while you lost your business and had your kids out of school for a year.'”

Truth may be slow to surface, but eventually, the truth usually breaks through. And that certainly appears to be the case here. The truth about the lab leak theory — that it’s actually the most plausible and not a wild goose-chase — is now emerging just about everywhere. I’m sure many of you remember we have been exposing this information since early last year.

Even Vanity Fair29 has an in-depth article detailing the drama. The theory that mere weeks ago was derided as debunked hogwash conspiracy theory, if acknowledged at all, is now suddenly getting the level-headed attention it should have, and probably would have, received all along, had it not been for Fauci and his co-conspirators. This case ought to establish one thing, and that is that “conspiracy theories” are not automatically untrue.

_______________________

**UPDATE**

GreatGameIndia just reported that Fauci’s emails reveal he threatened Indian scientists who discovered the COVID jabs are engineered with AIDS like insertions, which Nobel Prize winner Dr. Montagnier also asserts.

There is also evidence from another email showing that Fauci was told last March precisely how the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “was created.” Research partner Adam Gaertner gave Fauci a play-by-play and still Fauci stood before the world and lied about everything for an entire year.

Fauci was also told by leading infectious disease expert Kristian Andersen that the Indian studies exposing the AIDS-like features of the Chinese Flu did, in fact, make a strong case about its bioengineered nature. Fauci proceeded to ignore both of these men while peddling the fake narrative that the virus came from bats at a wet market.

The following YouTube video (Approx 6 min) reveals another horror from Fauci’s emails.

Fauci Tied to Scandal Involving Human-Animal Hybrid Experiments with Aborted Fetal Parts

http://

For more news videos on this go here.

https://danielcameronmd.com/causes-treatment-delays-lyme-disease/

CAUSES OF TREATMENT DELAYS 16 LYME DISEASE PATIENTS

The longer time between onset of symptoms and treatment of Lyme disease has been associated with poor outcomes. [1] Unfortunately, delays in treatment are often reported. So, what are the causes for such delays?

I have identified several factors that might have contributed to treatment delays in 15 Lyme disease patients. All 15 subjects failed their initial antibiotic treatment. In many cases, their illness could have been mitigated had diagnosis and treatment occurred in the early stages of the disease.

These 15 patients were part of a case series which included 100 Lyme disease patients who were treated at a single private medical practice. The study was described in the Journal Evaluation Clinical Practice. [2] All patients in the series met the CDC’s two-tier criteria with at least 5 out of 10 IgG positive Western blot bands.

Treatment delays for Lyme disease

Case 1

35-year-old man presented with an erythema migrans rash. One week later, he had a blood test, which was negative. He was never re-tested. The man was not treated for Lyme disease for 8 years.
Failure to treat an erythema migrans rash despite a negative test

Case 2

16-year-old girl was diagnosed with Epstein Barr and a streptococcal infection. Her tonsils were subsequently removed. She was not treated for Lyme disease for 8 years.
Failure to consider Lyme disease

Case 3

57-year-old woman had a tick bite followed by a swollen right knee. She was diagnosed with a meniscus tear. She was not treated for Lyme disease for 6 years.
Failure to consider Lyme disease

Case 4

16-year-old girl was diagnosed with Bell’s palsy. She subsequently did poorly in school. She was not treated for Lyme disease for 6 years.
Failure to consider Lyme disease; failure to associate Lyme disease as a cause of poor school performance

Case 5

31-year-old man had a 6” x 6” rash. He was not treated for Lyme disease for 4 years.
Failure to recognize an erythema migrans rash

Case 6

35-year-old man with typical symptoms. He was told he did not have Lyme disease by two doctors. He was not treated for Lyme disease for 3 years.
Failure to seek a second opinion from a doctor experienced in treating chronic manifestations of Lyme disease

Case 7

42-year-old woman with Bell’s palsy. She was told she did not have Lyme disease based upon results from a spinal tap. She was not treated for Lyme disease for 3 years.
Relied on negative spinal tap results to dismiss Lyme disease; failure to consider Lyme disease even with Bell’s palsy manifestation

Case 8

22-year-old man with sinusitis followed by two sinus operations. He was not treated for Lyme disease for 17 months.
Failure to consider sinusitis as a symptom of Lyme disease

15 Lyme disease patients experience delays in diagnosis and treatment. Study reviews each case and possible causes behind the delays. CLICK TO TWEETCase 9

75-year-old man with aches and pains and walking difficulties. He was told the symptoms were related to a previous heart attack and stroke. He was not treated for Lyme disease for 15 months.
Failure to consider Lyme disease

Case 10

50-year-old man with a rotator cuff and meniscus tear. He was not treated for Lyme disease for 8 months.
Failure to consider Lyme disease

Case 11

36-year-old woman with an ill-defined rash with a positive Lyme disease test. She was told it was not Lyme disease by her doctor. She was not treated for Lyme disease for 6 months.
Failure to recognize an erythema migrans rash; failure to seek a second opinion from a doctor experienced in treating chronic manifestations of Lyme disease

Case 12

75-year-old man with edema. He was treated initially with diuretics followed by steroids for “water on knee.” He was not treated for Lyme disease for 4 months.
Failure to associate “water on knee” as a symptom of Lyme disease

Case 13

18-year-old woman with a 4” x 4” rash followed by pericarditis. She was treated with steroids instead of antibiotics. She was not treated for Lyme disease for 3 months.
Failure to recognize an erythema migrans rash

Case 14

37-year-old man with disseminated Lyme disease rashes and asthmatic bronchitis. He was treated with steroids instead of antibiotics. He was not treated for Lyme disease for 2 months.
Failure to recognize an erythema migrans rash

Case 15

20-year-old woman was treated three times for cellulitis. She was not treated for Lyme disease for 2 months.
Failure to recognize an erythema migrans rash

Editor’s Note: These 15 patients did well with retreatment or treatment of a co-infection. It would have been easier to treat in a timely manner. Timely treatment would also avoid needless suffering.

There are multiple factors associated with treatment delays. These cases are reflective of only one practice and may not be generalizable to the broader population. Other factors may have contributed to these treatment delays.

Lyme disease patients should not have to suffer for months to years before being treated. More researcher on the causes behind treatment delays is required.

References:
  1. Hirsch AG, Poulsen MN, Nordberg C, et al. Risk Factors and Outcomes of Treatment Delays in Lyme Disease: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020;7:560018. doi:10.3389/fmed.2020.560018
  2. Cameron DJ. Consequences of treatment delay in Lyme disease. J Eval Clin Pract. Jun 2007;13(3):470-2. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00734.x

https://www.change.org/p/the-us-senate-calling-for-a-congressional-investigation-of-the-cdc-idsa-and-aldf/u/29172177?

HHS Request for Information

JUN 7, 2021 — 

Please see below my submission to HHS Request for Information: (Deadline June 11th)

How to submit a comment:  https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/04/27/2021-08167/request-for-information-rfi-developing-the-national-public-health-strategy-for-the-prevention-and

June 6, 2021

Developing the National Public Health Strategy for the Prevention and Control of Vector-Borne Diseases in Humans

It was once believed that rifampin was curative in treating Brucellosis but when symptoms returned doxycycline was added to the mix and when that too failed a third antibiotic, streptomycin was added to the current treatment regimen. [1] [2]

In 1985 the worldwide incidence of leprosy was 6,000,000. In 2018, it was 208,619. The only thing that changed was the addition of rifampin to dapsone in the treatment of the disease. Rifampin was added to dapsone because the M leprae were becoming resistant and it was a new antibiotic at that time.

Treatments for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis have been introduced (bedaquiline and delamanid) with more in the pipeline. [3]

A new treatment for recurrent Clostridium difficile was recently studied (bezlotoxumab) for reducing the risk of a repeat infection. [4]

In contrast, oral amoxicillin or doxycycline remains the treatment of choice for treating Lyme disease for over thirty years regardless if debilitating symptoms return. Since 1977 Dr. Allen Steere knew that these antibiotics were not effective for all patients [5] but there has been no change in treatment or research to find more effective ways to eradicate the infection in all stages of disease.

To my knowledge, a “Federal Working Group” was never established for brucellosis, leprosy, tuberculosis or C. difficile but then again there was no rush to create a vaccine as there was with Lyme disease. It would appear that a chronic relapsing seronegative disease did not fit the vaccine model.

All patients in the 2018 Middelveen et al pilot study were culture positive for infection (genital secretions, skin and blood) even after multiple years on antibiotics so there was no relief from current antimicrobials. Some of these patients had taken as many as eleven different types of antibiotics. [6]

Here’s what researchers at Johns Hopkins and Northeastern are saying: [7]

“Under experimental stress conditions such as starvation or antibiotic exposure, Borrelia burgdorferi can develop round body forms, which are a type of persister bacteria that appear resistant in vitro to customary first-line antibiotics for Lyme disease.”

Dr. Brian Fallon of Columbia University recently published his findings of autopsy specimens from a patient previously treated for Lyme disease. Persistent infection with the Lyme disease spirochete was identified in the brain of the Lyme patient who died with a diagnosis of Lewy body dementia. [8]

Any published evidence identifying persistent infection after extensive antibiotic treatment has been completely ignored. Please see my letter to the editor of the BMJ published June 2020 for examples. [9] The research to find a cure for this antibiotic resistant/tolerant superbug has been denied for decades as the co-chair of the Tick-Borne Disease Working Group, Dr David Walker calls persistent infection after extensive antibiotic treatment a “religious belief” [10] This partnership to deny chronic Lyme disease has left hundreds of thousands if not millions around the globe in a debilitated state.

For three decades now patient testimony all across America (and around the globe) has been describing a disease that is destroying lives, ending careers while leaving its victim in financial ruin.

Priority # 1 for Lyme disease:

Establish a Manhattan Project to Find a Cure for this antibiotic resistant/tolerant superbug and elevate Lyme to Highest Alert at the CDC while recognizing the disabling stage of Lyme disease.

Respectfully submitted,

Carl Tuttle
Hudson, NH

Member of Governor Chris Sununu’s Lyme Disease Study Commission
http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/statstudcomm/details.aspx?id=1515&rbl=1&txtbillnumber=hb490

Cc: All members of the New Hampshire Lyme Disease Study Commission

References: 

[1] Chronic Brucellosis and Persistence of Brucella melitensis DNA
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Chronic+Brucellosis+and+Persistence+of+Brucella+melitensis+DNA

[2] Administration of a triple versus a standard double antimicrobial regimen for human brucellosis more efficiently eliminates bacterial DNA load.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25246401

[3] Global Introduction of New Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis Drugs—Balancing Regulation with Urgent Patient Needs
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/22/3/15-1228_article

[4] New C.diff treatment reduces recurrent infections by 40%
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/01/170126081724.htm

[5] Lyme arthritis: an epidemic of oligoarticular arthritis in children and adults in three connecticut communities. 1977
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/836338/

Excerpt:

“The best treatment for this illness is not clear. Some physicians have reported that penicillin or tetracycline results in disappearance of the skin lesion (41,42), but others find antibiotics ineffective. Four of the patients with expanding skin lesions received penicillin but still developed arthritis.” 

[6] Persistent Borrelia Infection in Patients with Ongoing Symptoms of Lyme Disease
http://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/6/2/33

[7] A Drug Combination Screen Identifies Drugs Active against Amoxicillin-Induced Round Bodies of In Vitro Borrelia burgdorferi Persisters from an FDA Drug Library
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27242757/

[8] Detecting Borrelia Spirochetes: A Case Study With Validation Among Autopsy Specimens
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8141553/

[9] Lyme borreliosis: diagnosis and management
https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1041/rr-1

[10] Public comment: Does that sound like a religious belief, Dr. Walker?
https://www.lymedisease.org/tuttle-comment-tbdwg-nov17/

Request for Information (RFI): Developing the National Public Health Strategy for the Prevention and Control of Vector-Borne Diseases in Humans
The development of a national strategy on vector-borne diseases including tickborne diseases was…

US State Department Covered Up That China Was Responsible For COVID

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tucker-carlson-us-government-officials-helped-china-cover-up-covid-origins  News video  here (6/4/21).  Approx. 11 Min

 _______________________

**Comment**

I recommend watching the entire news segment as there is crucial information on numerous topics but specifically regarding the state of Lyme/MSIDS.

Important quotes:

So why did they lie to us about it for so long? A shocking new piece in, of all places, the celebrity suck-up magazine Vanity Fair, answers that question in great detail. You should read it. In short, many research scientists are addicted to tax dollars. If the public understood just how recklessly they’ve behaved — endangering the entire world with their weird little experiments in poorly relegated labs in China — the money might dry up. As a former NSC official called Jamie Metzl put it, ‘If the pandemic started as part of a lab leak, it had the potential to do to virology what Three Mile Island and Chernobyl did to nuclear science.’

Can’t have that. Got to keep the money flowing. So they lied about it. And then they intimidated anyone who told the truth.  Tucker Carlson

A perfect example of this intimidation is from the previous director of the CDC, Robert Redfield, who received death threats from scientists after he suggested the virus came from a lab.  Redfield states he expected the lashing out from politicians but not scientists.

This year has demonstrated the death-toll of science for anyone paying attention.  It has been replaced with propaganda by self-serving, grant seeking researchers who will do anything for a buck – even lie, cover up, and manipulate data.

Epidemiologist Kurt Wittowski has stated that funding for research has relied more and more on government grants, and less and less upon independent sources.  He states:

“Well, I’m not paid by the government, so I’m entitled to actually do science.”  Source

This is true for every area, but specifically for all issues surrounding Lyme/MSIDS.  The only transparent, forward moving science has been done by independent researchers who don’t have to follow an accepted narrative to receive funding.

As Carlson mentions in the video, our government never admits fault.  

Do we really expect this same government, which is accused of funding and performing research where ticks were tweaked in a lab and then dropped from airplanes, to admit this damning backstory and the years of faulty research done by The Cabal, based on carefully selected parameters to disprove chronic/persistent infection, and then rigging treatment guidelines for their own patent purposes?  And talk about intimidation.  Countless doctors have been wrongly accused, sanctioned, and had their medical licenses suspended or revoked for simply treating Lyme/MSIDS patients.  They are bullied and maligned by their own colleagues and called “quacks.”

To date, the myths and lies about tick-borne illness continue unabated.  
 
  • Fauci speaks favorably of dual use research of concern, or DURC, stating, “the risk-benefit ratio of such research clearly tips towards benefiting society”
  • Due to its controversial nature and potential to fuel bioweapons, several moratoriums have been placed on GOF research, including one in October 2014, after a string of high-profile “incidents” at U.S. biocontainment laboratories
  • NIAID has funded GOF research on bat coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), but Fauci — amid growing calls that COVID-19 was the result of a laboratory accident — has denied that such funding occurred
Currently there are 15 potentially deadly DURC pathogens – Tularemia is one of them (a pathogen also transmitted by ticks).

Because GOF, or DURC, can be used to make pathogens more readily able to infect humans, it poses major biosecurity risks, which makes publication of such data almost as controversial as the research itself.

Two studies on highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza ignited the debate in 2012. One, led by Yoshihiro Kawaoka at the University of Madison‐Wisconsin, identified molecular changes in H5N1 that would allow it to transmit among mammals.7

According to Ronnie Cummins, co-founder of the Organic Consumers Association (OCA) and Alexis Baden-Mayer, OCA’s political director (as mentioned earlier in the Mercola link on GOF experiments), moratoriums were placed on GOF research:

“Exemptions to this ‘pause,’ eventually reviewed by a secret government panel, were nonetheless allowed to go forward. The ban was lifted in 2017. Yet between 2014 and 2016, the NIH and Fauci-led NIAID continued funding gain-of-function research overseas at the Wuhan lab, via [Peter] Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance.

Not surprisingly both Fauci and Daszak have been staunch defenders of the official Chinese government story that the virus that causes COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) ‘naturally’ evolved from bats and/or other host species to infect humans.”

Clear Links Show NIAID Funded GOF Research

In a May 11, 2021, Senate hearing, Sen. Rand Paul questioned Fauci on the NIAID’s funding of GOF research on bat coronaviruses, some of which was conducted at the WIV. Fauci denied the charge, saying, “The NIH has not ever, and does not now, fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute.”18 However, NIH’s funding of such research can be easily double-checked.

In a Truth in Media report,19 investigative journalist Ben Swann reviews documents proving Fauci lied to Congress, including a paper titled “SARS-Like WIV1-CoV Poised for Human Emergence,”20submitted to PNAS in 2015 and subsequently published in 2016. In this paper, the authors state:

“Overall, the results from these studies highlight the utility of a platform that leverages metagenomics findings and reverse genetics to identify prepandemic threats. For SARS-like WIV1-CoV, the data can inform surveillance programs, improve diagnostic reagents, and facilitate effective treatments to mitigate future emergence events.

However, building new and chimeric reagents must be carefully weighed against potential gain-of-function (GoF) concerns.”

At the end of that paper, the authors thank “Dr. Zhengli-Li Shi of the Wuhan Institute of Virology for access to bat CoV sequences and plasmid of WIV1-CoV spike protein.” They also specify that the research was supported by the NIAID under the grant awards U19AI109761 and U19AI107810, which together total $41.7 million.

As noted by Swann, this paper clearly spells out that the NIAID spent $41.7 million on GOF research, with the aim of determining how bat coronaviruses can be made more pathogenic to humans, and that this research continued after the 2014 moratorium on such funding was implemented.  Source

According to Dr. Martin, the actual number is $191 BILLION dollars of audited funds for the bioweaponization of viruses against humanity.

https://jameslyonsweiler.com/2021/05/17/study-finds-patterns-in-vaers-data-that-provide-evidence-of-causality/

STUDY FINDS PATTERNS IN VAERS DATA THAT PROVIDE EVIDENCE OF CAUSALITY

If vaccine adverse events and deaths following COVID19 vaccination were truly not causally related, there would be an equal number of reports in the days following the vaccine administration. That’s a valid null hypothesis.

Do the data support non-causality? No. A new peer-reviewed study has found deaths clustered near the day of vaccine exposure, which is inconsistent with non-causality, and a dramatic increase in the autoimmune reports associated with COVID19 vaccination, consistent with predictions made by earlier studies predicting specific autoimmmune-related reactions based on the SARS-CoV-2 virus proteins.

The study, by Dr. Jessica Rose, is a report on carefully analyzed data from the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, is attached, along with the Editorial introducing it.  Both are also available and shareable from the journal website.

The results are numerous and compelling. Since anaphylaxis is known to be caused by COVID19 vaccines, Dr. Rose used anaphylaxis as a positive control, finding the same pattern of clustering of events in time in deaths and in many serious adverse events.

Dr. Rose also reported an expected increase increase in autoimmune-related reports in VAERS over time, which she attributed to the same mechanism I proposed and predicted in April 2020: Pathogenic Priming.

This study will be hotly debated because it drives to the core presumption that the VAERS data resource cannot be used to assess causality. Temporal association is a critical piece of evidence in causality; the test for clustering of the events so near the vaccination event provides a critical test of the hypothesis of causality.

Study here:  Rose, J. 2021. A Report on the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) of the COVID-19 Messenger Ribonucleic Acid (mRNA) Biologicals. Sci Publ Health Pol & Law 2:59-80. [LINK]  

(See link for graphs and tables)

_________________________

For more:

Vaccine specialist Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche states: 

Virologist, Dr. Montagnier states: 

Montagnier states:

  • SARS-CoV-2 appears to be a benign bat coronavirus modified to integrate spike proteins that allows the virus to enter human cells by attaching to ACE-2 receptors
  • The virus also appears to have been modified to integrate an envelope protein from HIV called GP141, which tends to impair the immune system. A third modification appears to involve nanotechnology, which allows the virus to remain airborne longer