Archive for the ‘Viruses’ Category

Fauci in Hot Seat as Emails Reveal His Lies

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/06/09/faucis-emails.aspx?

Fauci in the Hot Seat as Emails Reveal His Lies

Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola Fact Checked

June 09, 2021

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • Dr. Anthony Fauci — whose expertise has been held as indisputable by mainstream media since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic — is now facing mounting scrutiny and critique as correspondence obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request reveals he’s lied both to the public and the U.S. Senate on a number of issues
  • Emails show Fauci supported the kind of dangerous research that likely created the COVID-19 pandemic, and that he helped cover up the lab origin theory
  • Fauci, until very recently, exclusively promoted the natural origin theory. We now find he assisted in the creation of a paper in Nature Medicine that came to underpin the entire natural origin theory, all while being informed of the fact that there were indications the virus had engineered features
  • The FOIA documents also show Fauci has lied about masks being an effective form of protection
  • Fauci has also failed to acknowledge that natural immunity is acquired when you recover from COVID-19, which makes vaccination completely unnecessary, and has yet to oppose recommendations to vaccinate recovered COVID-19 patients even though they’re immune and appear to be more prone to vaccine damage

Saint Anthony’s halo is tarnishing and hanging more crooked by the day. Dr. Anthony Fauci — whose medical expertise has been held as indisputable by mainstream media since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic — is now facing mounting scrutiny and critique as correspondence obtained through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request by Buzzfeed reveals he’s lied both to the public and the U.S. Senate on a number of issues.

The emails were released to the public in the early-morning hours of June 2, 2021. All 3,234 pages of emails can be found on Document Cloud.1 News media pounced on the release, with each reporter offering their own spin on what the fallout of the emails might be.

https://video.foxnews.com/v/embed.js?id=6257693457001&w=466&h=263<noscript>Watch the latest video at <a href=”https://www.foxnews.com”>foxnews.com</a></noscript>”>http://https://video.foxnews.com/v/embed.js?id=6257693457001&w=466&h=263

Important Video Here (Approx. 10 Min):

“The Next Revolution” by Steve Hilton
In the video above,2 “The Next Revolution” host Steve Hilton details how Fauci and National Institute of Health director Dr. Francis Collins have both repeatedly lied about the origins of SARS-CoV-2.

‘Utter Fraudulence’

In a no-holds-barred monologue Wednesday, June 2, 2021, Fox News host Tucker Carlson (above) called for a criminal investigation of Fauci in the aftermath of the release of thousands of emails, exchanged in the early days of the pandemic between Fauci and numerous individuals, including Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg and billionaire Bill Gates.

Carlson blasted Fauci for what he said was “utter fraudulence” that should put Fauci under criminal investigation. After previously hosting him on many Fox newscasts, including Carlson’s own, the emails show Fauci is “just another sleazy federal bureaucrat — deeply political and often dishonest,” Carlson said.

What’s worse, the emails implicate Fauci “in the very pandemic he’d been charged with fighting.” While Fauci has denied funding gain-of-function research, emails now reveal he did indeed support “the grotesque and dangerous experiments that appeared to have made COVID possible,” Carlson said, adding that the emails are so damning that “in retrospect it looks a lot like perjury.”

Sen. Rand Paul apparently agrees. In a recent Fox News interview (below), Paul said the released emails reveal a “disturbing picture” that “should preclude [Fauci] from the position that he’s in.”

Fauci Lied About Not Funding Gain-of-Function Research

Some of the emails show Fauci, early in 2020, was concerned that Americans might think the virus came from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in China. Why would he be concerned about that? As noted by Carlson, this makes perfect sense if he knew he had funded the very research that now looked like the source of the pandemic.

January 31, 2020, Kristian Andersen, a virologist at the Scripps Research Institute in California, emailed Fauci stating that “The unusual features of the virus make up a really small part of the genome (<0.1%) so one has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features (potentially) look engineered.”

He later wrote that he and his team “all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory.” Interestingly, some six weeks later, Andersen published a paper in which he and his team insisted the virus could not have been created in a lab. I’ll have more to say on this later, as the email cache also reveals Fauci had a hand in the creation of that paper. On a side note, four days after the release of the emails, Andersen deleted his entire Twitter account.3

The next day, Fauci sent an urgent email to Dr. Hugh Auchincloss, the principal deputy director of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), titled “IMPORTANT.” “It is essential that we speak this AM,” Fauci wrote. “Keep your cell phone on … Read this paper as well as the e-mail that I will forward to you now. You will have tasks today that must be done.”

Attached to the email was a file titled “Baric, Shi et al – Nature medicine – SARS Gain of function.pdf.” This paper was written by Ralph Baric, Ph.D., a virologist in the U.S., and Shi Zhengli, a researcher at the WIV who specializes in bat coronaviruses.

May 11, 2021, Fauci testified before the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee.4 During an exchange with Sen. Rand Paul, Fauci insisted that “the NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.” He also insisted that Baric does not engage in gain-of-function research. This is the same Baric whose paper Fauci sent to Auchincloss, clearly marked as “SARS gain-of-function.”

As reviewed in “The Biggest Flip-Flop Ever — Who’s Going to Jail?” the kind of research Fauci funded has long been referred to as gain-of-function, yet now he’s trying to redefine what’s covered by that term.

As noted by Carlson in his June 2, 2021, report, social media platforms aggressively censored and deplatformed people for the “crime” of talking about the possibility of SARS-CoV-2 being a lab creation that got loose, and they did so largely based on the word of Fauci himself. Fauci said it wasn’t so, and that became the gospel repeated by fact checkers everywhere.

Now all of a sudden, there appears to have been a coordinated U-turn. The question is, why did they lie to us for so long? In the video report above, Carlson reveals part of the answer: Scientists were afraid to lose their funding, funding which, by the way, comes from the American taxpayers.

Fauci Lied About the Origin of the Virus

In an April 17, 2020, White House press briefing, Fauci lied again, when he said the science was “totally consistent with a jump from an animal to a human.” Yet “what he asserted as conclusively known could not have been known,” Carlson points out.

Two days after this press briefing, EcoHealth Alliance president Peter Daszak, Ph.D., wrote to Fauci thanking him for his help in deflecting the lab origin theory. The email reads:

“As the PI of the R01 grant publicly targeted by Fox News reporters at the Presidential press briefing last night, I just wanted to say a personal thankyou on behalf of our staff and collaborators, for publicly standing up and stating that the scientific evidence supports a natural origin for COVID-19 from a bat-to-human spillover, not a lab release from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.”

Who is Daszak? He’s none other than the middle-man between Fauci’s NIAID/NIH and the WIV. EcoHealth Alliance received several NIH grants for millions of dollars involving gain-of-function research on coronaviruses, which were then farmed out to Zhengli and others at the WIV. So, Daszak certainly had cause to want to deflect attention from the lab leak theory.

He was also well aware of how risky this research was. In 2015, he spoke at a National Academies of Science seminar on reducing risk from emerging infectious diseases, warning of the danger of experimenting on “humanized mice,”5 meaning lab mice that have been genetically altered to carry human genes, cells or tissues.

That same year, Daszak also published a paper in which he warned a global pandemic might occur from a laboratory incident and that “the risks were greater with the sort of virus manipulation research being carried out in Wuhan.”6

January 2, 2020, he sent out a tweet announcing he’d successfully isolated SARS coronaviruses “that bind to human cells in the lab,” and that the work of other scientists show some of these viruses have pandemic potential as they can infect humanized mice.7

Yet, from the get-go, Daszak did everything he could to dispel discussion about SARS-CoV-2 being anything but all-natural. He went on record dismissing the lab-origin theory as “pure baloney.”8,9

He was also the mastermind behind the publication of a scientific statement published in The Lancet10 condemning such inquiries as “conspiracy theory,”11,12 which was then relied on by the media to “debunk” theories and evidence showing the pandemic virus most likely originated from a laboratory.

To further ensure the lab-leak theory would die out, Daszak was chosen to be on two separate commissions charged with investigating the origin of SARS-CoV-2, one by the World Health Organization13 — which, of course, dismissed the lab theory out of hand — and one by The Lancet.14

‘Hidden Hand’ Behind Natural Origin Theory Revealed

Now, finally, all these efforts to obfuscate the truth are falling apart. Fauci’s role in the obfuscation is also becoming much clearer. In the documentary “Plandemic — Indoctornation,” Dr. Meryl Nass stated there had to have been “a hidden hand behind the Nature Medicine paper”15 that became the basis for the natural, zoonotic origin theory.

This paper is not to be confused with the other Nature Medicine paper cited earlier, published by Baric and Shi. The paper Nass is referring to was created by Scripps researcher Kristian Andersen who, in January 2020, told Fauci that some of the features of the genomic sequence “(potentially) look engineered.”

Andersen’s paper “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2”16 — published March 17, 2020, and co-written by Andrew Rambaut, Ian Lipkin, Edward Holmes and Robert Garry — became the preeminent “proof” that SARS-CoV-2 had a natural origin and couldn’t possibly come from a lab.

“Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus,” the paper states.17 The email cache now identifies who comprised the “hidden hand” behind this paper. They were none other than Fauci himself, NIH director Collins and Jeremy Farrar, head of the Wellcome Trust.

In the email on page 2,401, dated March 6, 2020, Andersen thanks Fauci, Collins and Farrar for their “advice and leadership” on the paper. His four co-authors are cc’d, along with the Salk Institute’s communications director, Chris Emery.

fauci email

Fauci, Collins and Farrar — A Tag-Team of Coverup Artists

This is huge. “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2”18 was the scientific underpinning of the natural origin claim, and now we find out Fauci himself was involved in its creation. Farrar and Collins are also neck-deep in this cover-up.

Farrar cosigned the scientific statement in The Lancet,19 which turned out to have been orchestrated by Daszak, as mentioned earlier. Farrar was also involved in the WHO Solidarity Trial,20 which poisoned patients with toxic doses of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). In this trial, which was clearly designed to prove HCQ was “dangerous,” they used a cumulative dose of 8,800 mg over 10 days.

Meanwhile, doctors across the world who reported success with the drug were using standard doses around 200 mg per day for just a few days. Farrar, having spent 18 years leading a clinical research unit in Vietnam,21 would have (or should have) been aware that such high doses of HCQ — a widely used anti-malaria medication — would be toxic.

As for Collins, he promoted the cover-up by publishing a March 26, 2020, blog post22 in which he said Andersen’s Nature Medicine paper proved a natural origin, and to ignore rumors to the contrary. What’s more, after Fauci unconvincingly tried to claim that the NIAID/NIH has never funded any gain-of-function research, Collins came to his rescue with a public NIH statement23in which he backed Fauci’s claim.

Bombshell Emails on What Fauci Knew

In a June 3, 2021, report, Carlson reviewed Fauci’s “surreal” media appearances following the release of the emails. As just one example, he simply laughed off the question of why so much of a particular email between him and Collins was redacted.

In the unredacted part, Collins warns Fauci that a “conspiracy theory” about the virus’ origin is gaining speed. Why, exactly, was this email redacted? What did the remainder of the email say? Fauci claims ignorance on the matter, and the mainstream media are letting him off the hook.

Now, when a document is redacted, a classification is assigned, explaining why parts must remain secret, and in this case, those classifications are interesting indeed. Redacted emails between Fauci and nongovernment individuals such as Zuckerberg and Daszak bear codes such as:24,25

  • (b)(4), which refers to information that would impair the application of state-of-the-art technology within a U.S. weapon system
  • (b)(6), which refers to information, including foreign government information, that would cause serious harm to relations between the U.S. and a foreign government, or to ongoing diplomatic activities of the U.S.
  • (b)(7), which refers to information that would impair the current ability of U.S. government officials to protect the president, vice president and other protectees for whom protection services, in the interest of national security, are authorized

Fauci Lied About Masks

The email cache also shows Fauci lied about other things, including masks and vaccines. In one email, Fauci explained that surgical masks don’t work against viruses because the viruses slip right through the material, which is the truth. But when it comes to his public statements about masks, Fauci has been a serial liar.

He started off saying Americans shouldn’t wear them because they offer little to no protection — which is true — and the benefits are mostly psychological, as it might make you feel safer. Then he changed his mind, urging everyone to wear a mask all the time. When confronted about this U-turn, he said he lied about masks not being effective because he wanted to make sure there would be enough for frontline workers.

Well, in reality, he lied about lying, because he told the truth that first time. Everything since then, however, has been one fib after another. One mask wasn’t even sufficient. Fauci started recommending two. Then he insisted people had to keep wearing them even after they get vaccinated. There’s no scientific rationale for this at all, and Fauci knows it.

Fauci Still Has Not Told the Truth About Natural Immunity

Fauci has also been dishonest about the need for COVID-19 vaccination. In early March 2020, a former Obama official emailed Fauci asking if people who recover from COVID-19 can expect to be immune thereafter. Fauci replied, “No evidence in this regard, but you would assume that their [sic] would be substantial immunity post infection.”

Here, it’s fairly safe to make assumptions because it’s a well-established medical fact that when you recover from a viral infection, you are immune, and that immunity can be lifelong in many cases. It would be quite unusual if immunity were not incurred after recovering from a viral infection. As noted by Carlson, that robust immunity occurs post-COVID-19 has also been confirmed in studies over the past year.

Now, if you have natural immunity against an illness, you do not need to be vaccinated. Period. Yet to this day, Fauci has never admitted this publicly, and he has not publicly opposed recommendations to vaccinate those who have recovered from COVID-19, even though there’s evidence to suggest such individuals are at higher risk of vaccine injury. Not even those who can prove they have antibodies are excluded from the vaccine push.

Fauci Tried to Derail Florida

Other emails from March 2020, discussed in The Beltway Report,26 show Fauci also promised to put pressure on Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis to close down gyms, bars and beaches.

The recipient of this email exchange was a Florida HIV specialist named Doug Brust, who wrote, “I’m the HIV doc here. I’m it … I am putting my life on the line so folks can go pump iron, drink beer, have a burger, and get a tan.” In response, Fauci wrote, in part:27

“Regarding the bars and beaches, I have been screaming on TV 2 to 5 times per night to tell the younger generation to start taking this seriously … I am very surprised that Gov. DeSantis has not completely closed the bars, even if they serve food. Take out only. I will bring this up at the Task Force meeting tomorrow.”

Fauci’s Book Release Scrubbed Amid Backlash

fauci book

In light of Fauci’s rapidly waning star power, his book, “Expect the Unexpected: Ten Lessons on Truth, Service, and the Way Forward,” slated for release in November 2021, has now been scrubbed from Amazon and Barnes & Noble. We found an archived copy of the original Amazon listing, but even the cached version disappeared within a week. If you search for the book on either of these book vendors now, you won’t find it. As reported by Just the News June 2, 2021:28

“The scrubbing of the book comes after backlash from critics who accused Fauci of profiting off of the deadly pandemic the U.S. response to which he has overseen.

Among those criticizing Fauci is Fox News Channel contributor Joe Concha, who compared him to New York Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo signing a seven-figure book deal about his efforts during the pandemic, which resulted in a high number of death among assisted-living residents.

‘If you look at the numbers again, you had Cuomo profiting off a pandemic, a government official,’ said Concha, also a media reporter for The Hill newspaper. ‘Now we have Fauci doing it as well. I think this is appalling.’

Daily Caller writer Greg Price slammed Fauci for ‘publishing a book and [becoming] the highest paid federal government employee while you lost your business and had your kids out of school for a year.'”

Truth may be slow to surface, but eventually, the truth usually breaks through. And that certainly appears to be the case here. The truth about the lab leak theory — that it’s actually the most plausible and not a wild goose-chase — is now emerging just about everywhere. I’m sure many of you remember we have been exposing this information since early last year.

Even Vanity Fair29 has an in-depth article detailing the drama. The theory that mere weeks ago was derided as debunked hogwash conspiracy theory, if acknowledged at all, is now suddenly getting the level-headed attention it should have, and probably would have, received all along, had it not been for Fauci and his co-conspirators. This case ought to establish one thing, and that is that “conspiracy theories” are not automatically untrue.

_______________________

**UPDATE**

GreatGameIndia just reported that Fauci’s emails reveal he threatened Indian scientists who discovered the COVID jabs are engineered with AIDS like insertions, which Nobel Prize winner Dr. Montagnier also asserts.

There is also evidence from another email showing that Fauci was told last March precisely how the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “was created.” Research partner Adam Gaertner gave Fauci a play-by-play and still Fauci stood before the world and lied about everything for an entire year.

Fauci was also told by leading infectious disease expert Kristian Andersen that the Indian studies exposing the AIDS-like features of the Chinese Flu did, in fact, make a strong case about its bioengineered nature. Fauci proceeded to ignore both of these men while peddling the fake narrative that the virus came from bats at a wet market.

The following YouTube video (Approx 6 min) reveals another horror from Fauci’s emails.

Fauci Tied to Scandal Involving Human-Animal Hybrid Experiments with Aborted Fetal Parts

http://

For more news videos on this go here.

Category:

Activism, Viruses

Dr. Mikovits Warns Spike Protein ‘Vaccine” May Kill 50 Million Americans & “Free & Brave” Q & A

https://www.brighteon.com/4e0bdf1b-c0a8-4bd0-b777-ad610fabcea Video Here (Approx. 40 Min)

Dr. Judy Mikovits warns spike protein “vaccine” injections may kill 50 million Americans

Health Ranger Report
6/4/21
____________________
 
**Comment**
 
There are many reasons to watch this interview, but Lyme/MSIDS patients take note: around 11:00 she discusses vaccines and tick-borne illness.  Summary below:
 
  1. People getting the COVID injections are being injected with the synthetic virus, the most dangerous spike protein consisting of HIV, XMRV, and SARS.
  2. Mainstream media has had to go back and reedit news articles they wrote where they used words like “debunked,” “conspiracy theory,” etc. when writing about the origins of COVID.  
  3. Mikovitz states lab originated viruses go all the way back to the 80’s under Fauci‘s watch.
  4. The COVID injections will kill those with HIV and the 6% of Americans who have XRMV (mouse virus from contaminating vaccines).
  5. She admonishes to NEVER get another shot so these lab contrived ‘pandemics’ end.
  6. She claims the push to get these injections is to coverup vaccine crimes.  She states victims are cremated so you can’t learn that what caused death was the vaccine-strain. She mentions the movies “Dallas Buyer’s Club,” and “The Band Played On.”
  7. In 2009, when Mikovitz’s paper came out in Science magazine, the government realized viruses were coming out of our laboratories so they rewrote history and called it a “biosafety level 2, unintended spread of a Biosafety Safety Level 2 Contaminant.”  She states this statement is fraudulent because contagious cancer is not a Biosafety Safety Level 2.  (Caused and spread by vaccines)
  8. Viruses know your immune system, & take advantage of when you are compromised.
  9. Mikovitz states we’ve been lied to for 40 years and that HIV was spread through a hepatitis B vaccination program with a contaminated vaccine.  
  10. She also states you can’t inject people with aborted fetal tissue and animal tissue and not adopt another human’s and animal’s virome.
  11. At 11:00 she discusses the explosion of “tick-borne illnesses” and states many have become infected through contaminated vaccines. She states animal cell lines have all been infected by ticks. (Mycoplasma, mold, borrelia, etc.)
  12. She states vaccine safety & efficacy studies have never been done and it’s HHS’s responsibility. 
  13. She reminds of the MMR debacle that if black boys get the shot before they are 3 years old they are 2-4 times more likely to develop autism, cancer, or even die.
  14. Mikovitz states there is always hope with natural therapies and that there are solutions right now.
  15. At 17:00 Adams asks Mikovitz for solutions for the spike protein.  She states that anti-retroviral natural products are the answer to stopping the rogue protein gene expression.  She states ozone therapy, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, quercitin are also good for stopping the disease, and the importance of avoiding GMO’s, and other vaccines as they activate the immune system.
  16. She states that peer-review science has been corrupted by Fauci and that since 1984 there hasn’t been any true, independent research (epidemiologist Kurt Wittowski states the same thing).  Scientific journals are now commercials for Big Pharma.
  17. She states that the con marched through Zika, bird flu, ebola, and swine flu, and has taken us to COVID now.
  18. Mikovitz states that there’s no data supporting the claim that her science on XMRX has been debunked.
  19. She states we need to take the system back and that there are criminals at the top of each governmental organization in the CDC, FDA, and EPA.  She states the entire system needs to be shut down by putting accountability back into Big Pharma, stopping university grants, and medical journals. 
  20. At 27:30 Adams asks her how many Americans she estimates will die due to these injections if the con continues and she states at least 50 million Americans over the next few years.  That’s 15% of the population.
  21. These deaths are going to look like heart attacks, strokes, blood clots, and accelerated cancers.
  22. Mikovitz states blood ozone therapy will help the vaccine injured.
  23. At 33:00 she states the spike protein IS the disease agent and that people shouldn’t be injecting this synthetic lipid virus it into their bodies.
  24. Adams states that they need the booster shots so they can continue circulating the spike protein in the population.
  25. Mikovitz states “NO SHOTS!” and that they are deadly.
  26. Mikovitz called for a moratorium on all vaccines.
  27. https://plaguethebook.com
  28. To get Mikovitz’s new book, Ending Plague: A Scholar’s Obligation in an Age of Corruption Health, you have to pre-order on Amazon as it will be widely censored.
********************************************************************************************************
 
https://www.bitchute.com/video/38qaHZC75L1w/  Video Here (Approx. 1 hour, 10 min)
 

Dr. Judy Mikovitz & Dr. David Martin

Q & A  from the “Free & Brave” conference in May.

Dr. Mikovits addresses the first question regarding “Suramin.”

Then Dr. Martin addresses the history of the development of the SARS bioweapon, which was originally funded for AIDS/HIV research in 1999, and he dropped this bombshell on the audience:

Anthony Fauci has spent, listen to this number, 191 BILLION dollars, not 3.7 million, not 30 million, 191 BILLION dollars of audited funds for the bioweaponization of viruses against humanity.

And it is YOUR money that has been spent.

Dr. Martin also explains how the COVID-19 “vaccine” does not meet the legal definition of a “vaccine,” but it meets the legal definition of a “bioweapon.”

A question was asked about who funds Dr. David Martin’s research worth hearing at 27:00.  

____________________

For more on Mikovitz and retroviruses:

Category:

vaccines, Viruses

Fauci Knew in 2020 Research He Backed May Have Led to COVID, FOIA Shows

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/tucker-carlson-fauci-committed-perjury-might-be-under-criminal-investigation-already

Tucker Carlson: Fauci committed perjury, might be under criminal investigation already

The Fox News host cited emails obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request indicating the president’s chief medical adviser knew in early 2020 that research he backed may have led to the creation of COVID-19.
Thu Jun 3, 2021 
Featured Image
By Raymond Wolfe

June 3, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – Tucker Carlson slammed Dr. Anthony Fauci, chief medical adviser to the president, on Wednesday, saying Fauci lied under oath and may be under criminal investigation based on recently released emails. 

Earlier this week, The Washington Post and Buzzfeed News published a trove of emails to and from Dr. Fauci obtained through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The messages show that Fauci knew in early 2020 that COVID-19 may have been engineered and appeared to express fears about research he supported that may have led to the creation of the virus.

“The utter fraudulence of Tony Fauci is obvious now, and it’s widely acknowledged,” Tucker Carlson said. “But it was not always obvious. In March of last year, we interviewed Fauci on this show. We treated him with respect. We took his answers seriously.”

“It soon became clear that Tony Fauci was just another sleazy federal bureaucrat — deeply political and often dishonest,” Carlson continued.

“More shocking, we then learned that Fauci himself was implicated in the very pandemic he’d been charged with fighting,” he said, apparently referring to “gain-of-function” experiments at a laboratory in Wuhan, China funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), which Dr. Fauci has led for decades. The NIAID is a division of the National Institutes of Health.

The new emails “show that from the beginning, Fauci was worried the public might conclude that COVID originated at the Wuhan Institute of Virology,” Carlson said. “Why was Fauci be concerned that Americans would conclude that? Possibly because Tony Fauci knew perfectly well he’d funded gain-of-function experiments at that same laboratory.”

“The emails prove Fauci lied about this under oath,” he concluded, pointing to an email from Kristian Andersen, a professor with the Scripps Research Institute who informed Fauci last January that the virus may well be man-made.  (See link for article)

_________________________

**UPDATE**

This email from Dr. Peter Daszak, researcher and President of the EcoHealth Alliance, a group that has extensive ties to the Wuhan lab gain of function research, thanks Fauci for dismissing the lab-leaked theory, despite many researchers saying it looked engineered.

According to this, a February 2020 email between Dr. Anthony Fauci and former Obama health and human services (HHS) secretary Sylvia Burwell, the nation’s top infectious disease expert said that store-bought face masks weren’t very effective in protecting one against COVID-19.  He turns out to have been correct, as several analyses – including the CDC’s own data – have shown that mask mandates (and double masking) have virtually no effect on virus spread, sentiment echoed by top epidemiologists.  Yet, the entire nation was told to wear masks.

ICAN just posted 3,000 emails sent by Fauci from early Feb. 2020 through May 2020.  These emails contain his comments on masks, therapeutics, vaccines, ventilators and other topics.  ICAN painstakingly sifted through these and give these highlights.

Read Fauci’s emails here and see a news story about it here.
  • February 5-6, 2020 (000239) – Fauci asked to recommend names for WHO group with the broad mission to “look at the origins and evolution of 2019n-CoV.”  Fauci responds by seeking to reframe the mission in a manner that would only look for natural and not lab made origin. 
 
  • February 7, 2020 (000189) – Fauci sent an internal NIAID communication reflecting that it was unlikely that the SARS-CoV-2 virus originated in a wet market. 
 
  • February 16, 2020 (000447) – Fauci tells CBS reporter that if the mortality turns out to be 0.2% to 0.4%, then SARS-CoV-2 should be treated like a severe seasonal flu.  But when the case fatality rate was later revised to between 0.2% and 0.4% by the CDC, Fauci continued to act as if the virus was something far more dangerous.
 
  • February 17, 2020 (000422) – Fauci receives communication from a Chinese citizen that is part of an international student program in the United States stating that, based on his contacts back in Wuhan, including correspondence from a nurse working in a Wuhan hospital, there is far more spread of the virus and far more deaths than China is admitting.
 
  • February 21, 2020 (000300) – Fauci asks a Deputy Director at NIAID to “Please handle” an email received by a group of doctors and scientists, including a virologist, that opined that “we think there is a possibility that the virus was released from a lab in wuhan (sic).”
 
  • February 23, 2020 (000257) – Fauci states “Transmission is definitely by respiratory droplet” and that “Children have very low rate of infection.” 
 
  • February 22, 2020 (000274-277) – Fauci confirms that “The vast majority of people outside of China do not need to wear a mask.  A mask is more appropriate for someone who is infected than for people trying to protect against infection.”
 
  • February 27, 2020 (000649) – Fauci tells Morgan Fairchild to tell her followers to be ready for “social distancing, teleworking, temporary closure of schools, etc.”
 
  • February 28, 2020 (001054) – Fauci, while uncertain what animal may have served as the intermediary jump from bats to humans for SARS-CoV-2, keeps repeating the narrative that it was a jump from bats through some natural non-lab means that was the origin of the virus.
 
  • February 28, 2020 (001059) – Fauci giving personal update to Mark Zuckerberg regarding developing a COVID-19 vaccine including telling Zuckerberg that “We may need help with resources” and that if there is a delay in the development timeline he just told Zuckerberg about, “I will contact you.”
 
  • March 1, 2020 (000922) – CBS’s Chief Medical Correspondent, seeking to please Fauci, emails Fauci a link to his segment which he appears to repeat what Fauci has told him, including that face masks “may give some partial protection by catching droplets containing virus but the virus is so tiny the virus can go right through it or around it” and describing the origin of the virus as “jumping from animals to people.”  Fauci responds with “Outstanding!!” apparently pleased that CBS pushed Fauci’s narrative that the virus was a natural jump from bats to humans.
 
  • March 1, 2020 (000937) – Despite media reports, Fauci makes it crystal clear he was not being muzzled by the White House.
 
  • March 16, 2020 (001554) – Fauci is asked “Given the relative safety of all but the elderly and those whose immune systems are compromised, and that they are far fewer than the rest of the population, why not quarantine only them?” and responds by stating “Stay tuned.”
 
  • March 17, 2020 (001537) – The next day, it does not appear Fauci intends to change his tune of pushing everyone, even healthy people with low risk of the virus, to give up all civil liberties and remain prisoners in their home, as reflecting in an email exchange between Fauci and Mark Zuckerberg, in which they share mobile numbers and plan to coordinate efforts to get people to comply with Fauci’s messaging, including social distancing for everyone, but the details of their plan are not included in the email exchange.
 
  • March 31, 2020 (001816) – Fauci receives a summary from his agency of the studies regarding how effective masks are to preventing the virus and the conclusion is as follows: “Bottom line: generally there were not differences in ILI/URI/or flu rates when masks were used.” 
 
  • April 2, 2020 (001778) – Fauci and Bill Gates have phone call where they agreed to a “collaborative” and “synergistic approach to COVID-19 on the part of NIAID/NIH, BARDS and the BMGF (Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation).”  It is concerning that one private person, Bill Gates, and his organization, BMGF, can exert that much behind-the-scenes influence on decisions that will impact the civil rights of all Americans during the pandemic.
 
  • April 8, 2020 (002351-2352) – Fauci, rejects most requests for calls, but accepts without any questions a request to arrange a call with the CEO of a Lilly, a major pharmaceutical company.
 
  • April 11, 2020 (002263-2264) – While Fauci claimed to have little time for anything else, Fauci confirmed the continued filming of “a film that will celebrate the importance of your [Fauci’s] life, science and public health” including filming during his “drive to NIH … once or twice a week,” “capture your working/appropriate conversations,” and “work on the Task Force.”
 
  • April 12, 2020 (002229) – Fauci writes “Many tests that have been used thus far are not accurate and ARE MISLEADING.”
 
  • April 16, 2020 (002142) – Fauci advises that even in the health care setting the mask policy should remain “voluntary.”
 
  • April 20, 2020 (002548-2549) – A Washington Post reporter contacts Katie Miller at NIAID for copies of article that Fauci stated are proof that the virus originated by natural means rather than being developed in a lab.  Instead of letting Katie Miller or someone on his staff respond, Fauci, who stated he gets 1,000 or 2,000 emails per day and only has time to respond to a tiny number of these emails, personally responds to the Washington Post reporter (who did not even write to Fauci) with the copies of the studies.
 
  • April 22, 2020 (002471-2472) – The National Academy of Science representative confirming to Dr. Francis Collins, head of NIH, that “WHO, Gates Foundation and European Commission have been leading and planning” the “global coordinating effort to accelerate vaccines, diagnostics and therapeutics” and that “there will be an announcement on the global structure with will [sic] involve Gates, WHO etc.” and Fauci explains in an email that “we have Gates reps on our ACTIV (Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines) working groups.”  Why is an unelected individual with his own private interests getting this incredible level of influence over decisions that will affect the freedoms and liberties of everyday Americans?
 
  • April 27, 2020 (002910) – Fauci appears to dismiss potential live saving treatment.  Fauci receives a report from the Chief, Section of Viral Pathogenesis at NIAID, Dr. Paolo Lussa, that “they treated a first group of five patients with potent anti-aggregant therapy (Tirofiban/Aggrastat) and apparently in all of them the p02 started to rise within less than 2 hours, they got off the ventilator and went on to full recovery.”  In response to this incredible news, Fauci merely writes “Thanks, Paolo.”  Apart from pushing Remdesivir, made by Gilead, a company with which Fauci has deep and long-standing connections, Fauci’s response to Dr. Lussa accords with his otherwise singular focus on developing and pushing a vaccine.
 
  • May 1, 2020 (002838) – While pushing one narrative regarding ventilators publicly, Fauci writes in a private email that “You are correct in that there is a more recent tendency to use ventilators only as a very last resort since oxygenation rather than ventilation appears to be key to recovery

For more:

It appears Fauci’s book has been scrubbed from Amazon and Barnes & Noble after the release of his emails.

Category:

Activism, Viruses

COVID “Vaccine” Less Than 1% Effective?

https://thehighwire.com/videos/covid-vaccine-less-than-1-effective/  8 Min. Video Here

POSTED: May 28, 2021

COVID “VACCINE” LESS THAN 1% EFFECTIVE?!

When it comes to Covid vaccines, what does “95% effective” really mean? Dr. Jim Meehan breaks down Relative Risk vs. Absolute Risk, and how Big Pharma manipulates the data on the absolute effectiveness of these failed vaccines, which leads the media and public into a false sense of security.

For more:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2&v=Jkwn5I8tLmE&feature=emb_logo  Video Approx. 32 Min

Dr. Ron Brown, April 2021

ABSOLUTE VERSUS RELATIVE RISK REDUCTION 

CORRECTION: THE FOLLOWING GRAPHIC REPLACES THE GRAPHIC IN THE VIDEO AT 5:44. Image: https://www.mdpi.com/medicina/medicin… Dr. Ron Brown of Waterloo University talks about his Cambridge and Medicina Paper. We discuss relative risk reduction and absolute risk reduction measures in the evaluation of clinical trial data. Dr. Ron Brown discusses the danger of outcome reporting bias and the misleading conclusions and violations of informed consent from outcome reporting bias in COVID-19 mRNA vaccine clinical trials.

Articles Referenced: https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/57/3/199 https://www.cambridge.org/core/servic…

Based on data reported by the manufacturer for Pfzier/BioNTech vaccine BNT162b2:

  • relative risk reduction: 95.1%; 95% CI, 90.0% to 97.6%; p = 0.016;
  • absolute risk reduction: 0.7%; 95% CI, 0.59% to 0.83%; p < 0.000.

For the Moderna vaccine mRNA-1273:

  • relative risk reduction: 94.1%; 95% CI, 89.1% to 96.8%; p = 0.004
  • absolute risk reduction, 1.1%; 95% CI, 0.97% to 1.32%; p < 0.000

Unreported absolute risk reduction measures of 0.7% and 1.1% for the Pfzier/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines, respectively, are very much lower than the reported relative risk reduction measures. Reporting absolute risk reduction measures is essential to prevent outcome reporting bias in evaluation of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy. View Full-Text

Peter Doshi, associate editor of The BMJ, pointed out that while Pfizer claims its vaccine is 95% effective, this is the relative risk reduction.

THE ABSOLUTE RISK REDUCTION — WHICH IS FAR MORE RELEVANT FOR PUBLIC HEALTH MEASURES — IS ACTUALLY LESS THAN 1%!

Remember what our corrupt public health officials told us?

These shots don’t do diddly but have the potential to kill or maim you.

But, the band plays on…..

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

COVID Doctor: Big-Gov/Big-Pharma Suppression of Ivermectin Cost 500,000 Lives

**UPDATE Aug. 21, 2021**

Due to denial, suppression, and censorship of ivermectin by mainstream medicine, our corrupt public health ‘authorities’, and bought-out media, people are now forced to self-treat with ivermectin using animal medicine, causing a surge in poisonings.  (This type of thing happens in Lyme-land as well for the same reasons)

https://thenewamerican.com/covid-doctor-big-gov-big-pharma-suppression-of-ivermectin-cost-500000-lives/?

COVID Doctor: Big-Gov/Big-Pharma Suppression of Ivermectin Cost 500,000 Lives

by Selwyn Duke
COVID Doctor: Big-Gov/Big-Pharma Suppression of Ivermectin Cost 500,000 Lives
Photo: RapidEye/iStock/Getty Images Plus

Last month, renowned physician Dr. Peter McCullough lamented that thousands of lives have been lost because the medical establishment has refused to create an “official treatment protocol” for COVID-19. Now another doctor is expressing similar sentiments, saying the World Health Organization (WHO) has purposely suppressed data on drug ivermectin’s effectiveness at treating the disease because the health authority is in Big Pharma’s pocket.

It’s a trespass that has cost a half million lives, contends critical-care physician Dr. Pierre Kory — and he calls the act “criminal.” As the World Tribune reports:

In a recent Zoom call, Dr. Pierre Kory of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance outlined numerous details showing the World Health Organization (WHO) knowingly suppressed data on the effectiveness of ivermectin against the virus in order to benefit the vaccine interests of Big Pharma.

“It’s criminal,” Kory said. “It’s literally criminal.” The drug “could have saved half a million lives this year if it had been approved.”

The WHO, Kory contends, is simply taking part in the tactics of a time-worn “Disinformation Playbook.” The term was coined by the Union of Concerned Scientists 50 years ago to describe the strategies corporations have developed over decades to “attack science when it goes against their financial interests.”

According to the Tribune, this disinformation strategy has five parts:

1. The Fake – Conduct counterfeit science and try to pass it off as legitimate research.

2. The Blitz – Harass scientists who speak out with results reviews inconvenient for industry.

3. The Diversion – Manufacture uncertainty about science where little or none exists.

4. The Screen – Buy credibility through alliances with academia or professional societies.

5. The Fix – Manipulate government officials or processes to influence policy inappropriately.

“In the full Zoom call, since removed by YouTube but available on Bitchute , Kory describes how the five tactics have been deployed against the scientific findings on ivermectin,” the Tribune continues. “One example is the corruption of leading medical journals, whose editors refuse to allow ivermectin studies to advance to peer review. The most egregious institutional participant, however, is the WHO.”  (See link for article)

_______________________
**Comment**
 
Please read this important article in full.  If you have the time, also watch the videos. The monkeys are rolling out of the barrel one by one and this information must be shared widely because it’s truly a wide-spread problem which doesn’t only concern the issue of COVID.
 
This article also explains why Lyme/MSIDS patients have suffered for over 40 years. The same exact 5 parts deployed in the disinformation playbook have been and are currently being used for tick-borne illness (TBIs).  
Dr. Kory states 500,000 lives could have been saved and Dr. McCullough states 85% of the lives lost could have been saved.
The question begging to be asked is: I wonder how many lives could have been saved of those with tick-borne illness if they were allowed appropriate anti-microbial treatment that treated ALL the pathogens for the duration of time needed?

Interestingly, the article mentions USSR’s Lysenkoism, and that the problem is worsened “when there’s an unhealthy nexus between science and state.”  These same words have been uttered by microbiologist Sin Hang Lee due to the fact the CDC has suppressed  direct testing methods for Lyme disease.  He also filed a “Stay of Action” against the Pfizer COVID “vaccine,” due to the faulty PCR tests used in the trials.

Lee is far from alone.  Lyme advocate Carl Tuttle recently gave ample evidence that the CDC is lying to the public about Lyme disease.

If a silver lining exists to the COVID ‘pandemic’ it’s that blatant corruption is finally being acknowledged and exposed. Perhaps this awareness will help suffering patients understand the need to seek specialists that have separated themselves from this corrupt paradigm and truly desire to help patients.

For a great read from New York Times best-selling author and journalist Michael Capuzzo who detailed the manner in which Ivermectin came to be used to treat COVID-19, and simultaneously subjected to global censorship despite its incredibly high success rate at treating the virus:  https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/The-Drug-that-Cracked-Covid-by-Michael-Capuzzo.pdf

Ivermectin is “what the world desperately needs now,” according to Dr. Pierre Kory, one of the founding members of the FLCCC. But although the desperate need is present, governing health bodies apparently seem intent on ensuring that the drug is not known, Capuzzo reveals. 

For more:  https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/prominent-physicians-scientists-believe-u.s-doctors-group-deserves-nobel-prize-for-finding-most-powerful-covid-19-killer-known-to-science

 

Category:

Activism, Treatment, Viruses