Archive for the ‘Ticks’ Category

Human Bartonellosis: Perspectives of a Veterinary Internist

https://dta0yqvfnusiq.cloudfront.net/galax57722929/2018/03/Human-Bartonellosis-5ab03952a5057.pdf

HUMAN BARTONELLOSIS:  PERSPECTIVES OF A VETERINARY INTERNIST

Edward B. Breitschwerdt, DVM, DACVIM
Chief Scientific Officer, Galaxy Diagnostics, Inc.
Professor, Internal Medicine, NCSU, Raleigh, NC
Adjunct Professor of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center
INTRODUCTION
Bartonella species are fastidious gram-negative bacteria that are highly adapted to a mammalian reservoir host and within which the bacteria usually cause a long-lasting intraerythrocytic bacteremia.  1-3  These facts are of particular importance to veterinarians and physicians, as an increasing number of animal reservoir hosts have been identified for various Bartonella species. Among numerous other examples, Bartonella henselae has co-evolved with cats, Bartonella vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii has co-evolved with dogs and wild canines, and Bartonella bovid has co-evolved with cattle.  1-2  Importantly, the list of reservoir-adapted Bartonella species, including a large number of rodent species that might serve as “pocket pets,” continues to grow exponentially, as new Bartonella spp. are discovered. Prior to 1990, there were only two named Bartonella species, whereas there are now at least 24 named and numerous unnamed or candidatus species, based upon deposited Gen Bank sequences or preliminary reports, respectively, seventeen Bartonella spp. including B.alsatica, B. bacilliformis, B. clarridgeiae, B. doshiae, B. elizabethae, B. grahamii, B. henselae (Houston 1 and San Antonio 2 strains), B. koehlerae, B. melophagi, B. quintana, B. rochalimaea, B. tamiae, B. vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii (Genotypes I, II and III), and B. washoensis have been associated with an expanding spectrum of human diseases.
Epidemiological evidence and experimental flea transmission studies support an important role for fleas in the transmission of B. henselae, B. clarridgeae and most likely B. koehlerae among cats. 1  Three other Bartonella species, B. bovid, B. quintana and B. vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii have been isolated from cat blood, but the modes of transmission and the reservoir potential of these species in felids has not been definitively established. Recently, we isolated Bartonella vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii from a cat with recurrent osteomyelitis spanning an eighteen month time period. 2  Thus, cats can maintain a chronic bacteremia with at least six Bartonella spp., of which five are known zoonotic pathogens.  1-3 In addition to fleas, an increasing number of arthropod vectors, including biting flies, keds, lice, sandflys and ticks have been implicated in the transmission of Bartonella species. Although there is clinical and epidemiological evidence to support tick transmission of B. vinsonii subspecies berkhoffii to dogs and coyotes, the mode of transmission of this Bartonella subsp. to cats and dogs has not been determined. Recent evidence supports tick transmission of B. henselae by Ixodes scapularis and Ixodes ricinus. Considering the diversity of Bartonella species and subspecies, the large number of reservoir hosts and the spectrum of arthropod vectors, the clinical and diagnostic challenges posed by Bartonella transmission in nature may be much more complex than is currently appreciated in human and veterinary medicine.
In the natural reservoir host, such as a cat or rodent, chronic bacteremia with a Bartonella species can frequently be detected by blood cultre or PCR in outwardly healthy individuals.  1-3  In contrast, the diagnostic detection of a Bartonella spp. in a non-reservoir adapted host, such as a dog, horse or human patient, can be extremely difficult. Most, although not all diseases caused by Bartonella spp. occur in accidental hosts and these organisms are being increasingly implicated as a cause of zoonotic infections.  4-8  It is important to recognize that strains of a Bartonella sp. vary in their virulence. Therefore, highly pathogenic strains of B. henselae, for which the cat is the primary reservoir, can induce granulomatous myocarditis in cats, presumably following flea transmission.  Until recently, mechanisms that facilitate persistent Bartonella bacteremia in mammals were not well understood. Recent reports have identified an intra-endothelial, as well as intra-erythrocytic localization for these bacteria, which represents a unique strategy for bacterial persistence. Non-hemolytic intracellular colonization of erythrocytes in conjunction with the ability to invade and replicate within endothelial cells would preserve the organisms for efficient vector transmission, protect Bartonella from the host immune response, and potentially contribute to decreased antimicrobial efficacy. Although the clinical implications are not understood, other in vitro studies indicate that Bartonella spp. can infect dendritic cells, microglial cells, monocytes and CD34+ bone marrow progenitor cells.
CAT SCRATCH DISEASE
For over a century regional lymphadenopathy has been associated with animal contact, particularly cat scratches. Over the years, numerous microorganisms were implicated as the cause of CSD. In 1992, Regnery and colleagues at the Centers for Disease Control, identified seroreactivity to B. henselae antigens in 88% of 41 human patients with suspected CSD compared to 3% of controls.  Subsequently, additional support for B. henselae as the predominant cause of CSD was provided when Bartonella DNA was amplified from lymph node samples of 21 of 25 (84%) patients with suspected
CSD, using a polymerase chain reaction assay. A similar study from Sweden identified B. henselae DNA, but failed to identify A. felis DNA, in a large number of patients with suspected CSD. Prior to the
recognition of B. henselae as the cause of CSD, Afipia felis, named for the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, was considered the sole cause of CSD. Subsequently, we blood cultured B. henselae or B. clarridgeae
from 17 of 19 cats owned by 14 patients with CSD, which indicated that bacteremia is a frequent occurrence in cats that transmit B. henselae
to a human being. 1-2
Historically, atypical manifestations of CSD have included tonsillitis, encephalitis, cerebral arteritis, transverse myelitis, granulomatous hepatitis and/or splenitis, osteolysis, pneumonia, pleural effusion, and thrombocytopenic purpura. With the advent of specific diagnostic techniques, (culture, serology, and PCR), there has been a dramatic increase in reports describing human patients with “atypical” manifestations of CSD. Osteomyelitis, granulomatous hepatitis and granulomatous splenitis have been increasingly recognized in children infected with B. henselae, who frequently lack the classical lymphadenopathy of CSD. Previously, Bartonella infection would not have been considered a likely differential diagnosis by the physician in patients lacking a history of lymphadenopathy or animal contact. As evidenced by reports in the past four years, the spectrum of human disease associated with the genus Bartonella continues to expand, requiring periodic reassessment as new information becomes available. On a comparative medical (“One Health”) basis, our research group has documented many of the same CSD atypical manifestations in cats or dogs, including encephalitis, transverse myelitis, granulomatous hepatitis, osteolysis, pleural effusion, and thrombocytopenic purpura. In this context, a highly prevalent, naturally-occurring human disease (CSD) can be used as a “model” to determine the potential behavior of these bacteria in companion animal patients.
Because cat scratch disease generally denotes a self-limiting illness characterized by fever and lymphadenopathy and because the recognized spectrum of human disease manifestations associated with Bartonella infections (which may not include fever or lymphadenopathy) has expanded considerably in recent years, it is becoming obvious that the designation CSD lacks clinical, microbiologic and zoonotic utility. Although cats are a major reservoir for B. henselae, B. clarridgeiae, and B. koehlerae, some patients deny the possibility of a cat scratch or bite wound, or indicate no contact with cats. Transmission from environmental sources, various arthropod vectors, perinatally or by other animal hosts is probable and the more inclusive term bartonellosis may facilitate enhanced future understanding of diseases caused by members of the genus Bartonella. As physicians have been taught that CSD is self-limiting, there is an ongoing lack of appreciation that B. henselae can cause chronic, asymptomatic or intermittently symptomatic illness, accompanied by persistent bacteremia in people. In this context, the documentation of chronic, relapsing bacteremia in cats, dogs and other animal species provides a “model” for better understanding human bartonellosis.
BARTONELLA ENDOCARDITIS
Endocarditis can be induced by a spectrum of Bartonella species in dogs and human patients and is the best example of documented disease causation for this genus. Historically, Bartonella species have been a cause of culture-negative endocarditis in people and dogs because the diagnostic methods used by microbiology laboratories were not adequate to isolate these bacteria. Now, by using
specialized techniques, a spectrum of Bartonella species have been identified in research and diagnostic laboratories in different parts of the world—in heart valves or in blood cultures from dogs
and people with endocarditis. 3  It is important for physicians and veterinarians to recognize that some of these Bartonella species are found in the blood of cats, dogs, rats, ground squirrels, and rabbits.
ISOLATION AND MOLECULAR DETECTION OF BARTONELLA SPECIES
Because conventional microbiological techniques lack sensitivity, bartonellosis is usually diagnosed by PCR amplification of organism specific DNA sequences and/or through serological testing. Recently, the development of a more sensitive isolation approach, using BAPGM (Bartonella alpha Proteobacteria growth medium) followed by PCR has greatly facilitated the molecular detection or isolation of Bartonella species from the blood of sick or healthy animals, including cats, dogs, horses and human beings. Most importantly, the use of this enrichment growth medium prior to PCR testing has allowed our research group to confirm that immunocompetent human patients, in particular veterinarians and veterinary technicians, can have chronic intravascular infections with Bartonella spp. 4-5 Information relative to this EnrichmentPCRTM testing platform for animal and human patients is available at www.galaxydx.com.
It is increasingly clear that no single diagnostic strategy will confirm infection with a Bartonella sp. in the immunocompetent patient population.  As described in studies from our NCSU laboratory, B. henselae, B. koehlerae and B. vinsonii subsp berkhoffii seroreactivity was found in only 58.6% of the patients in which Bartonella spp. infection was confirmed by EnrichmentPCR TM and sequencing. Therefore, Bartonella serology lacks sensitivity and can only be used to implicate prior exposure to a Bartonella sp. Even when serum from cat scratch disease patients, which is caused by B. henselae, is used in various diagnostic laboratories for IFA testing, test sensitivities have ranged from 14 to 100%.
EVOLVING IMPLICATIONS OF CHRONIC BARTONELLA SPP. BACTEREMIA IN IMMUNOCOMPETENT PEOPLE
Previously, we described B. quintana bacteremia in a woman who was tested following the development of an infected cat bite lesion involving the hand. 6  Two months later, the feral cat that had
induced the bite wound was captured and was also shown to be B. quintana bacteremic. In a cumulative study involving 392 patients with occupational animal contact or extensive arthropod exposure 31.9% were bacteremic with one or more Bartonella spp., when blood, serum and BAPGM enrichment culture PCR results were combined. Although this high prevalence of bacteremia is biased by testing at risk, sick individuals, it clearly demonstrates that intravascular infection with Bartonella sp. is much more common in immunocompetent patients, than was previously suspected. By IFA testing, only 75 out of 128 (58.6%) PCR positive patients were seroreactive to a panel consisting of five Bartonella sp. test antigens.
In a recent study, Bartonella vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii, Bartonella henselae or DNA of both organisms were amplified and sequenced from blood, BAPGM enrichment blood cultures or autopsy tissues from four family members. 7  Historical and microbiological results derived from this family support human perinatal transmission of Bartonella species. To date, there have been a limited number of studies that address the potential impact of intravascular infection with a Bartonella sp. on reproductive performance, however, studies involving experimentally-infected cats, rodents and naturally-infected cows with various Bartonella sp. have identified decreased reproductive performance involving both males and females. The parents of these children had attempted to conceive children for several years prior to resorting to in vitro fertilization.
We have also described a veterinarian, who experienced a needle stick while obtaining a fine needle aspiration sample from a cutaneous histiocytic neoplasm. 8  Subsequently symptoms, including headaches, fatigue and intermittent paresthesias (numbness) developed. This patient seroconverted to B. vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii genotypes I and III and B. vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii genotype I DNA was amplified and sequenced from sequentially obtained blood samples, whereas genotype III DNA was amplified from the cytological specimen. All symptoms resolved following antibiotic treatment.
It is increasingly evident that dogs can serve as a source for human infection with B. vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii. Bartonella vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii genotype II was amplified and sequenced from
a liver biopsy from a patient with epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (soft tissue tumor considered a vascular cancer), after which the organism was isolated by BAPGM blood culture. 9  The unique capability of Bartonella to invade and induce long lasting intraerythrocytic and intraendothelial infections, in conjunction with the ability of at least three Bartonella spp. (Bh, Bq, and B. bacilliformi) to induce VEGF-mediated vasoproliferative disease in immunocompromised or immunocompetent individuals suggests that these novel emerging bacterial pathogens might contribute to the development of vascular tumors.
Bartonella koehlerae bacteremia was documented in eight immunocompetent patients by PCR amplification and DNA sequencing, either prior to or after BAPGM enrichment blood culture.10  Presenting symptoms most often included fatigue, insomnia, joint pain, headache, memory loss, and muscle pain. Four patients were also infected with Bartonella vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii genotype II. Bartonella koehlerae antibodies were not detected (titers<1:16) in 30 healthy human control sera, whereas five of eight patient samples had B. koehlerae antibody titers of 1:64 or greater. Studies are needed to determine if B. koehlerae is a cause or cofactor in the development of arthritis, peripheral neuropathies or tachyarrhythmias in human patients. Co-infection with B. henselae and two hemotropic Mycoplasma variants resembling Mycoplasma obis were also found in the blood of a veterinarian with a historical diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. 11
PUBLIC AND OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CONSIDERATIONS
Due to extensive contact with a spectrum of animal species, veterinary professionals appear to have an occupational risk of infection because of frequent exposure to Bartonella spp., therefore these individuals should exercise increased precautions to avoid arthropod bites, arthropod feces (i.e. fleas and lice), animal bites or scratches and direct contact with bodily fluids from sick animals. As Bartonella spp. have been isolated from cat, dog or human blood, cerebrospinal fluid, joint fluid,aqueous fluid, seroma fluid and from pleural, pericardial and abdominal effusions, a substantial number of diagnostic biological samples collected on a daily basis in veterinary practices could contain viable bacteria.
The increasing number of defined Bartonella spp., in conjunction with the high level of bacteremia found in reservoir adapted hosts, which represent the veterinary patient population, ensures that all veterinary professionals will experience frequent and repeated exposure to animals harboring these bacteria. Therefore, personal protective equipment, frequent hand washing and avoiding cuts and needle sticks have become more important as our knowledge of this genus has improved and various modes of transmission have been defined.
Physicians should be educated as to the large number of Bartonella spp. in nature, the extensive spectrum of animal reservoir hosts, the diversity of confirmed and potential arthropod vectors, current limitations associated with diagnosis and treatment efficacy, and the ecological and evolving medical complexity of these highly evolved intravascular, endotheliotropic bacteria.
REFERENCES
1  Chomel BB, et al. Vet Res 2009;40:29.
2  Breitschwerdt EB, et al. J Vet Emerg Crit Care 2010; 20:8.
3  Chomel BB, et al. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2009;1166:120.
4  Breitschwerdt EB, et al. J Clin Microbiol 2008;46:2856.
5  Breitschwerdt EB, et al. Parasit Vectors 2010;3:29.
6  Breitschwerdt EB, et al. J Clin Microbiol 2007;45:270.
7  Breitschwerdt EB, et al. J Clin Microbiol 2010;48:2289.
8  Oliveira AM et al. J Vet Intern Med 2010;24:1229.
9  Breitschwerdt EB, et al. J Clin Microbio 2009;47:1957.
10 Breitschwerdt EB, et al. Parasit Vectors 2010;3:76.
11 Sykes JE, et al. J Clin Microbiol 2010;48:3782.
____________________

Glandular Tularemia

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMicm1801531

Glandular Tularemia

  • Laura Marks, M.D., Ph.D.,
  • and Andrej Spec, M.D.
nejmicm1801531_f1

A 68-year-old man from Missouri presented to the primary care clinic with a history of 1 week of fever followed by 2 months of progressive, painful swelling on the right side of his neck. Approximately 2 days before the onset of the patient’s symptoms, his outdoor cat died from a subacute illness; a veterinarian had diagnosed feline leukemia without laboratory testing, and the cat had been treated with prednisone, which the patient administered. The patient’s physical examination revealed three erythematous, tender lymph nodes. The remainder of the physical examination was normal. Serologic testing with IgM antibody was positive for Francisella tularensis (titer, 1:1280). A diagnosis of glandular tularemia was made. Glandular tularemia is the second most common manifestation of tularemia after the ulceroglandular form. Because culture requires biosafety level 3 conditions, diagnosis is often confirmed serologically. Domestic cats can become infected through the consumption of infected prey and can transmit the bacteria to humans. The patient was treated with doxycycline for 4 weeks; the lesions improved within 5 days and resolved within 3 weeks.


Laura Marks, M.D., Ph.D.
Barnes–Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO

Andrej Spec, M.D.
Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO

___________________

 

**Comment**

I remember hearing Timothy Lepore, MD, FACS, surgeon at Nantucket Cottage Hospital, at a Lyme conference.  He explained that Tularemia is also a disease of those who work with the land such as landscapers and farmers, as well as those who get bit by a tick. There are cases reported in every state but Hawaii, and many other wild and domestic animals can be infected. The highest rates of infection are in Arkansas.  Please see this link for more details but know that this is a bioweaponized pathogen:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2016/10/25/of-rabbits-and-men/  The WHO estimates that an aerosol dispersal of 50 kg of F. tularensis over an area with 5 million people would result in 25,000 incapacitating casualties including 19,000 deaths.

For hunters:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/08/07/tularemia-hunting-dogs-as-possible-vectors/  “The frequency of about seven percent shows that hunting dogs can also become infected regularly. As vectors of the disease, even without symptoms, the animals must also be considered unexpected carriers,” Posautz adds.

Study Shows Tick Infection & Transmission Potential for Both DTV & WNV

https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/vbz.2017.2224#utm_source=ETOC&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=vbz

Generation of a Lineage II Powassan Virus (Deer Tick Virus) cDNA Clone: Assessment of Flaviviral Genetic Determinants of Tick and Mosquito Vector Competence

Kenney Joan L. , Anishchenko Michael , Hermance Meghan , Romo Hannah , Chen Ching-I , Thangamani Saravanan , and Brault Aaron C.
Published Online:1 Jul 2018https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2017.2224

Abstract

The Flavivirus genus comprises a diverse group of viruses that utilize a wide range of vertebrate hosts and arthropod vectors. The genus includes viruses that are transmitted solely by mosquitoes or vertebrate hosts as well as viruses that alternate transmission between mosquitoes or ticks and vertebrates. Nevertheless, the viral genetic determinants that dictate these unique flaviviral host and vector specificities have been poorly characterized. In this report, a cDNA clone of a flavivirus that is transmitted between ticks and vertebrates (Powassan lineage II, deer tick virus [DTV]) was generated and chimeric viruses between the mosquito/vertebrate flavivirus, West Nile virus (WNV), were constructed. These chimeric viruses expressed the prM and E genes of either WNV or DTV in the heterologous (from one species to another) nonstructural (NS) backbone. Recombinant chimeric viruses rescued from cDNAs were characterized for their capacity to grow in vertebrate and arthropod (mosquito and tick) cells as well as for in vivo vector competence in mosquitoes and ticks.

Results demonstrated that the NS elements were insufficient to impart the complete mosquito or tick growth phenotypes of parental viruses; however, these NS genetic elements did contribute to a 100- and 100,000-fold increase in viral growth in vitro in tick and mosquito cells, respectively. Mosquito competence was observed only with parental WNV, while infection and transmission potential by ticks were observed with both DTV and WNV-prME/DTV chimeric viruses. These data indicate that NS genetic elements play a significant, but not exclusive, role for vector usage of mosquito- and tick-borne flaviviruses.

________________

**Comment**

I’m no microbiologist and without the full article and better understanding of what this NS backbone is, 

The study shows 4 things:

  1.  The NS elements gave a 100 fold “test tube” increase in viral growth in tick cells.  These organisms are extremely fastidious and difficult to study in a lab.  It’s even tougher to figure out how this plays out in the human body.
  2. INFECTION & TRANSMISSION potential by ticks was observed with both DTV and WNV.  Read that sentence again.
  3. Why didn’t this make the news?
  4. Mosquitoes are nasty but ticks are a whole other monster.  Mosquito research gets all the money.  Why?

http://www.dutchessny.gov/CountyGov/Departments/Legislature/2017Auerbach.pdf  This pdf by Lyme Advocate Jill Auerbach shows that while there were only 5,700 cases of WNV in 2012, research dollars were $29 million, whereas, Lyme cases in 2012 were 312,000 but received only $25 million.  While the number of the infected continue to soar the research dollars for Lyme are radically reduced in successive years:

Disease New Cases (annual) NIH Funding
 

Hepatitis C 2012

 

1,300

 

$112 million

West Nile Virus 2012

5,700

$29 million

HIV/AIDS 2012

56,000

$3 billion (11% total NIH budget)

Influenza 2012

73,000

$251 million

Lyme disease 2012

312,000

$25 million

Lyme disease 2013

363,070

$20 million

*Lyme disease 2004             198,040                                  $34.4 million

Disease

      New Cases 2015

CDC funding 2016

Lyme Disease

           380,690  (10 x 38,069)
2016 numbers not yet available

 $10 million

This does NOT include other Tick-borne diseases

Houston, we have a problem.

 

 

 

Talking Tick Prevention: Ask a UW Veterinarian

https://www.vetmed.wisc.edu/ask-a-uw-veterinarian-talking-tick-prevention/

Talking Tick Prevention:  Ask a UW Veterinarian

Talking Tick Prevention

The question below was featured in the Summer 2018 issue of On Call, the magazine for friends of the UW School of Veterinary Medicine. This expert response comes from Juliet Caviness DVM’17, primary care veterinarian at UW Veterinary Care and SVM clinical instructor.

Have a question for our veterinary medical experts?
Please send them to our On Call magazine editor at oncall@vetmed.wisc.edu. We cannot guarantee responses to all submissions. For any urgent pet health issue, please contact your veterinarian directly.
Question: Are the ingestible tick preventatives okay to use on tiny dogs? My dogs are under five pounds.

–Denise, Barrington, Illinois

Answer: Tick prevention is a key component of preventative medicine to keep your pet free of parasites and reduce the risk of parasite-transmitted diseases. Tick-borne disease (like Lyme disease or Anaplasmosis) is a very common problem in Wisconsin, which makes year-round administration of tick preventative even more important.

There are many options on the market these days for tick preventatives, ranging from topical spot-on products to collars, sprays, and oral medications. Newer oral products (including brands like Simparica, NexGard, and Bravecto) have been shown to be very effective and can avoid the mess sometimes involved with liquid spot-on products (such as Frontline and Advantix), which are applied directly to the skin, usually between the shoulder blades.

Oral products are very convenient for those who might hold their pets often, have small children, or have dogs who love to swim or are bathed frequently due to allergies or other skin conditions, as one concern with topical medications is that they must remain in contact with the skin for long enough to be absorbed before the pet can get wet.

On the other hand, an oral medication may not be well-suited to dogs with sensitive digestion, as some dogs may experience vomiting or diarrhea as a side effect. Other limiting factors would include the age and weight of your pet. Some oral products are not labeled for use in very young dogs (Bravecto and Simparica are for puppies six months and older) and some are only labeled for dogs just under five pounds and up, such as NexGard and Bravecto.For the tiniest of adult dogs or older puppies, Simparica is available in 2.8-to 5.5-pound doses.

As always, we recommend that you consult with your veterinarian in choosing the appropriate medication for your pet.

Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever (RMSF)

Since the recent death of a Wisconsin resident due to Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever (RMSF) it’s important we understand this pathogen as it’s in our neck of the woods:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/07/10/first-rmsf-death-in-wisconsin/

The following article by doctors Lapenta (father & son) explains how devastating this particular tick borne illness is and what you need to know about it.

http://dermagicexpress.blogspot.com/2018/05/the-rocky-mountain-spotted-fever-and.html?m=1

THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN SPOTTED FEVER AND THE NEW PLAGUE OF THE 21ST CENTURY, THE TICKS

rocky

ABSTRACT

In this publication we bring you another disease caused by the bite of several TICKS; it is the ROCKY MOUNTAIN SPOTTED FEVER, which is caused by a bacterium called Rickettsia Rickettsii, and also another recently discovered the Rickettsia Parkeri. This disease, described since the 1900s, is disseminated in North America, from Canada to South America. The purpose of this publication is to know the main vectors of the disease, how it is transmitted, its symptoms, treatment and to give warning to the world once again that these parasites, ticks are the new plague of the 21st century.

Key words: Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, spotted fever, Typhus by ticks, Black measles, Dermacentor Andersoni, Dermacentor Variabilis, Rhipicephalus Sanguineus, Rickettsia Rickettsii, Rickettsia Parkeri.

INTRODUCTION

Hello friends of the network, today DERMAGIC EXPRESS brings you another interesting topic about the TICKS and the diseases they transmit, in this case it is the ROCKY MOUNTAIN SPOTTED FEVER (RMSF), which as I said is transmitted by the a tick bite and disseminated not only in the United States, has also been described in the AMERICAS under the name of “Sao Paulo fever” or “Fever maculosa” in BRAZIL; In MEXICO “Spotted fever” and “tick Typhus” or “Tobia Fever” in COLOMBIA. Cases have also been described in Costa Rica and Panama. [1-5]

This disease is produced by the BACTERIA called Rickettsia Rickettsii; gram-negative intracellular cocobabicil considered the most pathogenic strain of the Western Hemisphere and a small part of the Eastern Hemisphere. It belongs to the Rickettsiaceae Family, Order: Rickettsiales, Class: Alphaproteobacteria, Domain: Bacteria, Genus: Rickettsia and species: Rickettsia rickettsii. The disease extends from CANADA to SOUTH AMERICA, and is the most frequent rickettisial disease in the United States. [6-11]

rocky4

The main TICK transmitter of this bacterium are the ticks of the DERMACENTOR genus, Family Ixodidae, known as “HARD TICKS” which, in addition to transmit the Rickettsia rickettsii, are transmitters of other diseases such as: TICK PARALYSIS (neurotoxin); the POWASSAN virus (Powassan encephalitis); THE FEVER Q (Coxiella burnetii); ANAPLASMOSIS in cattle and humans (Anaplasma Marginale and Anaplasma spp.); TULAREMIA (Francisella tularensis) and the BABESIOSIS in  equine (piroplasmosis) and humans  (Babesia Caballi and Babesia spp.). [12-18]

The DERMACENTOR genus of ticks belongs to the Ixodidae Family and has more than 34 described species and the most involved in the ROCKY MOUNTAIN SPOTTED FEVER are DERMACENTOR ANDERSONI (Rocky mountain tick) and DERMACENTOR VARIABILIS (American dog tick), second main vector causing this disease.

rocky1

Of this “hard tick” (DERMACENTOR VARIABILIS) I can say to you that in addition to transmit the ROCKY MOUNTAIN SPOTTED FEVER, it is transmitter of TULAREMIA (Francisella tularensis). They can also be carriers of the Anaplasma phagocytophilum that causes the HUMAN GRANULOCYTIC ANAPLASMOSIS, and Ehrlichia chaffeensis, causal agent of the HUMAN MONOCITIC EHRLICHIOSIS; and in addition they can produce TICK PARALYSIS when introduce a NEUROTOXIN when  are feeding with human blood.

In addition to the DERMACENTOR VARIABILIS and ANDERSONI TICKS as vectors of the ROCKY MOUNTAIN SPOTTED FEVER (RMSF), other species have been described: RHIPICEPHALUS SANGUINEUS (brown tick of the dog), AMBLYOMMA CAJENNENSE (Cayena tick) which is disseminated in South and Central America, AMBLYOMMA AMERICANUM (Lone Star Tick) and AMBLYOMMA MACULATUM (Tick of the Gulf Coast) involved in the transmission of this disease. [1-22]

rocky2

On the other hand, it was discovered in the year 2002 and confirmed in 2013 another species of Rickettsia, the Rickettsia Parkeri in the tick AMBLYOMMA MACULATUM and recently in the tick AMBLYOMMA AMERICANUM capable also of transmit the ROCKY MOUNTAIN SPOTTED FEVER (RMSF).

In addition, it has been demonstrated in the tick DERMACENTOR VARIABILIS AND RETICULATUS antibodies against BORRELIA BURGORFERI which is the causal agent of the already described LYME DISEASE or ERITHEMA MIGRANS, but they are not considered vector of it.

rocky3
HISTORY

The disease ROCKY MOUNTAINS SPOTTED FEVER, is also known under the name “TYPHUS BY TICKS”, and “BLUE DISEASE” and was described in the years 1800 and 1900 in the Valleys of Montana United States, (US), known at that time as “Black measles” for its clinical characteristics. Later it was discovered that the ticks were the vector of the same one and it was in the year 1906, when the scientist Howard T. Ricketts discovered the causal agent, described as an agent “smaller than a bacterium and longer than a virus”; it was called RICKETTSIA RICKETSII in honor of its name. [22-30]

We must remember that Willy Burgdorfer is intimately linked to the ROCKY MOUNTAIN SPOTTED FEVER and study of the Rickettsias; In fact, between 1967 and 1978, he was investigating the Rickettisial Zoonoses in Egypt and then he was sent by the WHO (1976-1986 – World Health Organization) to Montana, United States, and in the course of his investigations he discovered the FEARED ESPIROCHETE BORRELIA, in the year 1981, which carries in its honor the surname BURGODERFERI.

These ticks are the NATURAL HOSTS and they serve as RESERVOIRS AND VECTORS, they transmit the RICKETTSIA through the bite to vertebrates mammals and man, and unlike other diseases they only need to be attached 2 hours to the skin to achieve the transmission of the disease, so that it is a ZOONOSIS, transmitted from animals to man. It can also be transmitted through fluids, tick feces and contaminated tissues of the same.

SYMPTOMS

Symptoms of the disease appear after an incubation period of 1 to 2 weeks, (can affect children and adults) and include threee stages:

1.) INITIAL phase: fever, headache, nausea, vomiting, loss of appetite, mumps,

2.) SECONDARY phase: characterized by maculous and petechial rash, abdominal pain, conjunctivitis and joint pain.

3.)  POSTERIOR or LATE stage: the  Rickettsia may invade the brain, heart, eyes, lungs, kidneys, gastrointestinal tract, and other organs causing definitive sequel such as: deafness, ataxia, blindness, and loss of bladder and bowel control; in extreme cases amputation of limbs by gangrene. Mortality in severe cases: 30-80%

The “CLASSICAL TRIAD” of this disease in terms of symptoms is: 1) FEVER, 2) MACULOUS AND PETECHIAL ERUPTION AND 3) THE PRECEDENT OF TICK BITE; it should be noted that only 35 to 60% of patients manifest the complete TRIAD, and 40% do not present the TYPICAL rash of the disease; it is presented in a centripetal form, from the extremities to the trunk. [1-32]

TREATMENT

The treatment of choice for THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN SPOTTED FEVER (RMSF) is the  DOXYCYCLINE (tetracycline antibiotic), the same used in the LYME disease and EHRLICHIOSIS, which is administered for a period of 10 to 14 days, and in some cases may be more longer. The other antibiotic that shows effectivity against Rickettsia is  the CHLORANPHENICOL, but this should be used with caution as it has many side effects.

With this I want to tell you in a simple way how seven (7) TICKS are capable of transmit nine (9) diseases:

Including the ticks of the Family ixodidae: IXODES SCAPULARIS or the black legged tick.

1) ROCKY MOUNTAIN SPOTTED FEVER (Rickettsia Rickettsii).

2) POWASSAN ENCEPHALITIS (Powassan virus, flavivirus).

3) TICK PARALYSIS (neurotoxin).

4) EHRLICHIOSIS (Ehrlichia chaffeensis, Ehrlichia ewingii).

5) HUMAN GRANULOCYTIC ANAPLASMOSIS (Anaplasma spp)

6) BABESIOSIS IN ANIMALS AND HUMANS (Babesia spp).

7) FEVER Q (Coxiella burnetti).

8) TULAREMIA (Francisella tularensis).

9) LYME DISEASE (Ixodes Scapularis). 1-32]

“… perhaps other diseases …. Today not well documented or simply man has not discovered yet.”

CONCLUSIONS

On the web you can find thousands of articles about the ROCKY MOUNTAIN SPOTTED FEVER, HISTORY AND SYMPTOMS, but for us the main objective of this publication is to make you UNDERSTAND the following:

1) These TIICKS are distributed practically in the entire PLANET.

2) Transmit parasitic diseases with risk of MORTALITY if the diagnosis and treatment is not made in time.

3) Some of the transmitted diseases are RESISTANT to treatment such as LYME disease, leaving permanent sequel in the body, being able to confine the patient to a wheelchair for life.

4) Apart from fighting for the human rights of the unassisted for diseases such as LYME, the final destination is to fight against the TICKS and their HOSTS.

5) THE CODES ICD-11 (International Classification of Diseases, year 2018) for this disease, Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever have been recognized by the World Health Organization (WHO) a long time ago, but  in some cases as the Lyme disease, the scientific society and affected population awaits its inclusion.

6) The new plague of the 21st century is not the mosquitoes (Dengue, Zika and Chikungunya), they are TICKS. [33-38]

“… Humanity is not going to be extinguished by atomic bombs thrown into the air, atomic bombs walk in the earth attached to animals, mice, rats, birds, coyotes, deer, dogs, cats, cattle, goats, camel sheep, rabbits, etc, or the humans, feeding on his blood, contaminating and spreading vertiginously, slowly creating a incapacitated society … “

Greetings to all.

Dr. José Lapenta R Dermatologist
Dr. José M. Lapenta MD.
__________________

For more on RMSF:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/10/21/mom-got-rocky-mountain-spotted-fever-while-picking-pumpkins/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2015/08/13/severe-case-of-rmsf-had-to-remove-patients-arms-and-legs/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/08/16/new-tick-causes-epidemic-of-rmsf/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/06/12/georgia-mom-warns-others-after-son-contracts-rocky-mountain-spotted-fever-after-tick-bite/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/08/19/monster-ticks-found-in-germany-threaten-europe-with-deadly-disease-crimean-congo-fever/  Please note the last quote of the story – that they proved a tropical form of tick typhus in one of tropical ticks found in Germany. Typhus, a bacteria, is making a comeback, particularly in the South. Common in the U.S. in the 40’s, and normally attributed to lice, now it’s been proven to be in a tick. In other words, another disease and a tick found where they supposedly shouldn’t be.
Typus is a rickettsial infection with ticks carring numerous species including rickettsia, ehrlichia, and anaplasma. Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever is also considered a tick-borne typhus fever. https://www.health.ny.gov/diseases/communicable/rocky_mountain_spotted_fever/fact_sheet.htm  Divided into the typhus group and the spotted fever group, disease is transmitted through ectoparasites (fleas, lice, mites, and ticks). Inhalation and inoculating conjunctiva with infectious material can also cause disease. The good news for most is that doxycycline is a front-line drug for it. Broad-spectrum antibiotics aren’t helpful.